Ok, so we can finally put one of the myriad of topics to rest that exists only because of partisan stupidity.
By reading this article and understanding the intent, and by reading liberal reactions, we can now say that boycotting a brand based on ideological beliefs if a very sound and acceptable way to show our support, or our disapproval. Right? We can all agree on that now, correct? The argument is over. Those who boycott are not hateful. They aren't trying to cause problems. They simply want their wallets to speak to their narrative because that's how a Capitalistic society works. End of story.
So, that means all the hate liberals spread about those boycotting Bud Light has to be taken back and liberals have to apologize.
I mean, it's either that or liberals finally just accept their hypocrisy and that they spread, "Everything we think is right but everything anyone else believes is wrong" narrative. Can't have it both ways. It's one or the other.
And before anyone says that Bud Light's boycotts was out of hate for those who do not subscribe to traditional gender roles, one could as easily (with empirical and proof-positive evidence) use context from illegals raping and killing women, and the liberals defending them, as hatred. Sure, that's only if you cherry pick context and get rid of context that doesn't agree with your narrative. But that is EXACTLY what liberals are doing in this case. Which means both liberals and cons are doing the same thing, only the topic is different.
I know this won't change anything. But the bigger fight America needs to have is to fight against that narrative as it has done waaaaaaaaaaaay more damage to this country than illegals, gender opposers, etc. And since it has done more damage, it's a fight more worthy than these stupid partisan fights that both parties come up with that never get fixed so we just pile on more and more hatred.
Hey s*&^bag, next time just slink away. There's no need to prove me right.
Idiot.