And are you saying the Russians didn't offer dirt to Trump's campaign which he failed to report?
Are you saying the Russians didn't hack the DNC and leak the emails?
Are you saying Russia didn't have trolls farms mainly helping Trump?
No seriously, don't run from this. Tell us what you believe.
#25 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT AT 2019-08-30 01:11 PM | FLAG:
Russians offered dirt, not against the law to take it or is not considered a campaign contribution.
Still not proven it was the Russians that hacked the DNC. No hard evidence and the strongest evidence is it was an inside job, pissed off Bernie supporter. And before you go psycho, why did the DNC refuse to give the fbi their servers to investigate the hack?
Troll farms? BFD, a bunch of crappy Facebook pages, some asking for votes for Hillary.
How about Hillary paying Christopher Steele who has ties to Russia to write the Russian Dossier?
#33 | POSTED BY FISHPAW
1. "Russians offered dirt, not against the law to take it or is not considered a campaign contribution."
Actually it's illegal to take it from a foreign government and yes, its a campaign contribution. How could you not know this? Literally the FEC just said this.
2. "Still not proven it was the Russians that hacked the DNC."
The FBI, CIA, DHS, DOJ, FEC, Pentagon, Mueller, and everyone else disagrees with you. So you know better?
3. "Troll farms?"
It was a million dollar budget at one point. Glad you admit it was illegal though.
4."How about Hillary paying Christopher Steele who has ties to Russia to write the Russian Dossier?"
RNC paid him first actually. And it is completely legal to pay a third party to investigate and gather information on an opposing candidate even if they use contacts in a foreign government to gather information for the report. So...did you have a point?
To be okay with Donald Trump, you have to live in a different universe with different laws and facts.
Thank you, Fish, for proving the point.