Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Sunday, September 22, 2019

President Trump suggested Sunday that he mentioned former vice president Joe Biden and his son Hunter in a phone call with the leader of Ukraine.

Advertisement

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

On NBC News's "Meet the Press," Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin repeatedly declined to say whether it was appropriate for the president to ask a foreign leader to investigate a political rival and suggested that Trump did not pressure Zelensky.

"You're speculating that the president pressured. I don't have any reason to believe that the president pressured ... in any way," Mnuchin said. Mnuchin argued that rather than focusing on "confidential discussions" between two world leaders, "I really think that the real issue here is not what the president said but what indeed did Biden's son do."

Mnuchin struggled, however, when asked during a separate interview on CNN's "State of the Union" about his claim that the Biden family's business dealings in Ukraine were "inappropriate."

"I don't understand," host Jake Tapper said. "So it is okay for Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump Jr. to do business all over the world " it's okay for Ivanka Trump to have copyrights approved all over the world while President Trump is president " but while Vice President Joe Biden was vice president, his son shouldn't have been able to do business dealings?"

Mnuchin responded that there was a "significant difference" between the Bidens' dealings and the "potential business dealings that the Trump Organization has had, which predated his presidency."
__________________________________

Trump also on Sunday took aim at Biden for saying that he never spoke with his son about his overseas business dealings, telling reporters, "I mean, give me a break."

"This is a very dishonest thing that Joe Biden did," Trump said, repeating his attacks on the Biden's family business dealings. "And then he said he never spoke to his son. Does anybody believe that one?"

Trump has repeatedly claimed that he did not speak to his son, Donald Trump Jr., in advance about a June 2016 Trump Tower meeting at which Russians had offered to provide dirt on Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

No one needs to add opinion to the above quotations of actual conversations. Their common sense meanings comes through loud and clear.

#1 | Posted by tonyroma at 2019-09-22 05:21 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

With an MSM that does not hesitate at all to make up stuff about Trump, how do you what the truth is, Tony?

#2 | Posted by goatman at 2019-09-22 07:02 PM | Reply

Hundreds of federally elected GOP representatives and ONE profile in courage:


Mitt Romney @MittRomney

If the President asked or pressured Ukraine's president to investigate his political rival, either directly or through his personal attorney, it would be troubling in the extreme. Critical for the facts to come out.

#3 | Posted by tonyroma at 2019-09-22 08:15 PM | Reply

For those with rationally functional intellect, today's documented utterances to the press gaggle will feel like his comments to Lester Holt did.

Trump essentially confessed to asking Ukraine to help him politically:

Trump, while speaking with reporters before departing the White House for events in Texas and Ohio, continued to defend his July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, but said the 2020 Democratic presidential primary candidate was discussed in the exchange.

"We had a great conversation. The conversation I had was largely congratulatory, was largely corruption -- all of the corruption taking place, was largely the fact that we don't want our people like Vice President Biden and his son (adding to the corruption)," Trump told reporters.

www.cnn.com

#4 | Posted by tonyroma at 2019-09-22 09:27 PM | Reply

Did I just hear the first gurgle of a death rattle in Trump's semi-confession?

The transcript hasn't even been released yet and he's already beginning the spin.
Now he can deny the first lie and replace it with a half lie before moving on to some bigger diversion to get the media off his scent. Lord only knows what extreme he'll use this time. They keep getting less and less credible.

One can hardly deny Trump's transparency when his pattern is so obvious.

#5 | Posted by Twinpac at 2019-09-23 06:38 AM | Reply

"The call was all okay and beautiful. Nothing wrong was discussed. No you can't see the transcripts. Why? Because I have nothing to hide."

- Fat Nixon.

#6 | Posted by Nixon at 2019-09-23 07:13 AM | Reply

NIXON

"Nothing wrong was discussed"

Trump is getting more delusional every day.

He appears to be launching his next role as an Imperial President.

#7 | Posted by Twinpac at 2019-09-23 07:29 AM | Reply

As Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) put it yesterday, "The existence of an explicit quid pro quo " aid for interference " isn't really the thing. If he demanded a foreign government do his political bidding, that's when he crossed the critical threshold. No need to overthink this."

It's a compelling point. What we know at this point raises the specter of Trump urging a foreign government to look for " or by some measures, manufacture " damaging information Republicans could use to win an American election.

But what surprised me over the weekend was Trump's willingness to largely admit what he did.

It was hard not to feel a little pity for the White House's allies who spent a few days running around telling anyone who'd listen that nothing happened, only to have Trump chop off the limb his supporters had a climbed out upon.

www.msnbc.com

Just look at all the now contradictory comments made by Trump's sychopantic posters over the weekend claiming that whatever was being reported in the about the whistleblower by unnamed sources had no veracity, and now Trump has admitted the meat - that Trump did speak to their president about Biden's involvement in Ukraine when Joe was VP - of the reason the complaint was allegedly filed in the first place.

Such things happen when you ignore that Trump has been documented lying well over 12,000 times in less than 3 years.

#8 | Posted by tonyroma at 2019-09-23 08:22 AM | Reply

...reported in the media about the whistleblower....

#9 | Posted by tonyroma at 2019-09-23 08:23 AM | Reply

Did I just hear the first gurgle of a death rattle in Trump's semi-confession?

#5 | POSTED BY TWINPAC

Nope. Republicans don't care. As long as he keeps pissing off liberals, they don't care about anything else he does.

Goat is already deflecting by saying the "MSM" lies about Trump, but just about everything in the article and the post he responded to are direct quotes. Goes straight to his good old ad hominem - "Slaughter the Source".

Though, I am still waiting for him to claim that Trump just said this to get attention and that liberals are being his "puppets" by talking about it.

#10 | Posted by gtbritishskull at 2019-09-23 09:18 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Advertisement

Advertisement

"Nope. Republicans don't care. As long as he keeps pissing off liberals, they don't care about anything else he does."

And nominating conservative judges. Doesn't change your overall point though. Newsworthy.

#11 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2019-09-23 09:26 AM | Reply

stuart stevens @stuartpstevens

The next Democratic President apparently has Donald Trump's blessing to encourage foreign countries to investigate His kids. Think Saudis will protect Kushner? China protect Ivanka? Russia protect Jr? Or Scotland protect Eric? Perfectly normal according to Donald Trump.

#12 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2019-09-23 10:03 AM | Reply

Shane Harris @shaneharris

This is perhaps not the best messaging strategy that the administration is rolling out here. Why is it ok for the president's children to have international business dealings but not the vice president's son? The secretary [Mnuchin] won't answer that.

#13 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2019-09-23 10:05 AM | Reply

Just look at all the now contradictory comments made by Trump's sychopantic posters over the weekend claiming that whatever was being reported in the about the whistleblower by unnamed sources had no veracity, and now Trump has admitted the meat - that Trump did speak to their president about Biden's involvement in Ukraine when Joe was VP - of the reason the complaint was allegedly filed in the first place.
Such things happen when you ignore that Trump has been documented lying well over 12,000 times in less than 3 years.

#8 | POSTED BY TONYROMA AT 2019-09-23 08:22 AM | FLAG:

Look how the mouth breathers like you won't even post what the allegations are against Biden. All you can say is "several legal persons have looked at this and have found no wrongdoing." Sure sounds legit, Hunter Biden gets booted from the Navy for being a coke head, he gets a job on a Ukraine energy company board for $50,000 per month with no experience with energy or Ukraine but his father is the VP of the United States. The company has some shady dealings and is being looked at by a Ukraine government prosecuter. Biden has a meeting and tells Ukraine either the prosecuter gets fired or they don't get US aid and then brags about it on national TV. And guess what the left says "nothing to see here, move along, the firing had nothing what so ever with Biden. And I'm sure you will post some links fom MSNBC and CNN with a source "who is knowledgable about the situation." I'm sure people like Roma and Skull would dismiss this the same way if it was Trump's son.

#14 | Posted by fishpaw at 2019-09-23 10:26 AM | Reply

Sure sounds legit, Hunter Biden gets booted from the Navy for being a coke head,

Guy wasn't even active duty. He couldn't stop doing coke for one weekend a month where he would possibly be open for urinalysis. If there were one person in the Biden family who would knowingly or unknowingly be easy to take advantage of via foreign influence, it would be a guy with a drug problem so extreme that it costs him his commission in the military.

#15 | Posted by GOnoles92 at 2019-09-23 10:35 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Look how the mouth breathers like you won't even post what the allegations are against Biden. All you can say is "several legal persons have looked at this and have found no wrongdoing."

Click on my name moron and you'll find this, this this and this along with several others.

I also posted information contained in an article entitled Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize His Father's Campaign?

So don't come here and make idiotic accusations when you haven't even bothered to read that I have already done that which you accuse me of not doing. And then there is THIS story, written on 9/10 from Just Security, before any public knowledge of the whistleblower: Trump and Giuliani's Quest for Fake Ukraine "Dirt" on Biden: An Explainer.

Go suck yourself.

#16 | Posted by tonyroma at 2019-09-23 10:39 AM | Reply

Joe Biden and son Hunter cleared of wrongdoing by Ukraine prosecutor

nypost.com

#17 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2019-09-23 10:40 AM | Reply

Ukraine Prosecutor Made Up Biden Claim, Kiev Lawmaker Says

www.bloomberg.com

#18 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2019-09-23 10:43 AM | Reply

#16 Thanks for being so transparent Tony, I noticed that all of your links discussed Hunter Biden's qualifications for the job and his vast experience in the energy business and Ukraine which would justify his $50k per month salary. NOT. So suck yourself hack.

#19 | Posted by fishpaw at 2019-09-23 10:55 AM | Reply

#16 cont.

Actually I misstated something. The article I quoted above has the sub-heading

Joe Biden's son is under scrutiny for his business dealings and tumultuous personal life.
So how can I be dismissive of facts that I brought to the table myself?

#20 | Posted by tonyroma at 2019-09-23 10:55 AM | Reply

#18 So you include a story that says VP Biden did not recieve money from the Ukraine energy company. That is not the story, it's why his son got the job in the first place.

#21 | Posted by fishpaw at 2019-09-23 11:00 AM | Reply

#16 cont.
Actually I misstated something. The article I quoted above has the sub-heading

Joe Biden's son is under scrutiny for his business dealings and tumultuous personal life.
So how can I be dismissive of facts that I brought to the table myself?
#20 | POSTED BY TONYROMA AT 2019-09-23 10:55 AM | FLAG:

None of your links discuss why Hunter got the job in the first place which is what raises the red flags, or at least with non partisan hacks.

#22 | Posted by fishpaw at 2019-09-23 11:05 AM | Reply

I noticed that all of your links discussed Hunter Biden's qualifications for the job and his vast experience in the energy business...

Then you didn't read the part where Biden was brought in by his association with the company he worked for and did so on the recommendation of his partner who was recruited by the former President of Poland, an anti-corruption reformer.

In early 2014, Zlochevsky sought to assemble a high-profile international board to oversee Burisma, telling prospective members that he wanted the company to adopt Western standards of transparency. Among the board members he recruited was a former President of Poland, Aleksander Kwaniewski, who had a reputation as a dedicated reformer. In early 2014, at Zlochevsky's suggestion, Kwaniewski met with Archer in Warsaw and encouraged him to join Burisma's board, arguing that the company was critical to Ukraine's independence from Russia. Archer agreed.

When Archer told Hunter that the board needed advice on how to improve the company's corporate governance, Hunter recommended the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner, where he was "of counsel." The firm brought in the investigative agency Nardello & Co. to assess Burisma's history of corruption. Hunter joined Archer on the Burisma board in April, 2014. Three months later, in a draft report to Boies Schiller, Nardello said that it was "unable to identify any information to date regarding any current government investigation into Zlochevsky or Burisma," but cited unnamed sources saying that Zlochevsky could be "vulnerable to investigation for financial crimes" and for "perceived abuse of power."

Hunter was brought on by Burisma to wring out corruption, not cover it up. Burisma didn't pay Biden, Biden's company had a %3.4 million contract that Biden's pay came from, so any direct implications of something wrong has no basis in fact. I also posted this quote from the Ukraine prosecutor: "from my point of view, a board member can be paid whatever a company decides ... they didn't violate any Ukrainian laws," so what exactly is scandalous about Biden's compensation?

#23 | Posted by tonyroma at 2019-09-23 11:06 AM | Reply

Joe Biden bragging about getting Ukrainian prosecutor {who was investigating his son} fired: scontent.fhhr1-1.fna.fbcdn.net

Maybe the one who needs to be investigated is joe....

#24 | Posted by MSgt at 2019-09-23 11:07 AM | Reply

" If there were one person in the Biden family who would knowingly or unknowingly be easy to take advantage of via foreign influence, it would be a guy with a drug problem so extreme that it costs him his commission in the military.

#15 | POSTED BY GONOLES92 AT 2019-09-23 10:35 AM | FLAG: "

So says someone who voted for George W. Bush twice. Hilarious!

#25 | Posted by danni at 2019-09-23 11:12 AM | Reply

Trump and Giuliani allege, contrary to evidence, that Biden improperly pressured the Ukrainian government in 2016 to fire then-Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin in the midst of a corruption investigation of one of Ukraine's biggest gas companies, Burisma Group. Biden's youngest son, Hunter, was serving on the company's board at the time.

But the prosecutor, in fact, was the target of pressure by Ukrainian anti-corruption advocates and a host of international supporters of Ukraine, who argued he should be fired for failing to pursue major cases of corruption. And it was the widely known and publicly espoused position of the U.S. government, across a half dozen agencies, that the prosecutor's ouster was among crucial anti-corruption measures that the Ukrainian government needed to take to move forward economically and politically. As President Barack Obama's point man on Ukraine, Biden dutifully relayed those messages at every opportunity.

Yet Trump and Giuliani have turned that real-life scenario on its head, falsely alleging that Biden sought to corruptly influence a Ukrainian prosecutor's decisions in his son's favor. At the very least, because of the complexity of the issue and the again-distant locale, the hammering on the Bidens' roles in Ukraine could at least serve up enough disinformation to confuse American voters about what really is true.

September 10, 2019

#26 | Posted by tonyroma at 2019-09-23 11:12 AM | Reply

Maybe the one who needs to be investigated is joe....

#24 | POSTED BY MSGT

Investigate everyone! Investigate the investigators! Investigate you! Investigate me! Anyone who questions Dear Leader must be investigated! But don't investigate Trumpy! No no! He is above the law. He has magical Prez powers.

For now.

#27 | Posted by donnerboy at 2019-09-23 11:16 AM | Reply

who was investigating his son

The investigations never involved Hunter Biden, the actions investigated predated his acceptance of his board seat in April 2014.

And Hunter joined the board because the owner was trying to make his company more transparent to conform to the better business practices being demanded by the west and the IMF.

#28 | Posted by tonyroma at 2019-09-23 11:17 AM | Reply

If there were one person in the Biden family who would knowingly or unknowingly be easy to take advantage of via foreign influence, it would be a guy with a drug problem so extreme that it costs him his commission in the military.

Trumpers suddenly care about people who are "unknowingly easy to take advantage of via foreign influence."

Ha

Haha

Hahaha

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

#29 | Posted by JOE at 2019-09-23 11:20 AM | Reply | Funny: 3

And Hunter joined the board because the owner was trying to make his company more transparent to conform to the better business practices being demanded by the west and the IMF.

#28 | POSTED BY TONYROMA AT 2019-09-23 11:17 AM | REPLY

LOL, he was so well qualified for this.

#30 | Posted by fishpaw at 2019-09-23 11:47 AM | Reply

Trumpers suddenly care about people who are "unknowingly easy to take advantage of via foreign influence."

So are both Hunter Biden and Trump incorruptible? Lmfao

#31 | Posted by GOnoles92 at 2019-09-23 12:04 PM | Reply

"But don't investigate Trumpy! No no! He is above the law. He has magical Prez powers."

#27 | POSTED BY DONNERBOY AT 2019-09-23 11:16 AM | FLAG: I consider your statement quite a joke as the President has been under one investiigation, or another retty much from the beginning of his presidency. Where have you been that you are not aware of that?

#32 | Posted by MSgt at 2019-09-23 12:18 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

So are both Hunter Biden and Trump incorruptible?

How you'd derive that from my post we'll never know, but I wouldn't expect a Trumper to have reading comprehension or logical ability to draw conclusions.

#33 | Posted by JOE at 2019-09-23 12:22 PM | Reply

How you'd derive that from my post we'll never know -Joe

Deflect away from Hunter Biden's poor character to Trump exhibiting poor character: noted.

Deflection of feigning a lack of self-awareness, likewise noted.

#34 | Posted by GOnoles92 at 2019-09-23 01:32 PM | Reply

Treasonous...
but then again,
the entire GOP is
complicit in the fact...
indeed, it is hard to fathom
that the Leadership got blindsided
by his cheating in the 2016 election
so they have been in on the 'take' from the beginning...

(and somewhere the GOP shrugs)...

Can't have a Democracy at all, if one Party
refuses to play by the laws and rules laid
down by the Founders...

#35 | Posted by earthmuse at 2019-09-23 03:27 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

EARTHMUSE

"Can't have a Democracy at all, if one Party
refuses to play by the laws and rules laid
down by the Founders...

That seems to be Trump's goal. Vladimir Putin wants to see western democracy crushed flatter than a pancake and Trump is doing just what he's paid to do.

As his reward, I believe Trump has visions of his very own Imperial Presidency if he get's re-elected.

#36 | Posted by Twinpac at 2019-09-23 03:45 PM | Reply

That seems to be Trump's goal. Vladimir Putin wants to see western democracy crushed flatter than a pancake and Trump is doing just what he's paid to do.
As his reward, I believe Trump has visions of his very own Imperial Presidency if he get's re-elected.
#36 | POSTED BY TWINPAC AT 2019-09-23 03:45 PM | FLAG:

You really still think that Trump used Putin to get elected. That is amazing that after 3 years of investigations, 1000s of witnesses, over 40 million dollars in legal fees that people still think that. Amazing there can still be such a disconnect with reality.

#37 | Posted by fishpaw at 2019-09-23 04:16 PM | Reply

Trump Suggests he did Mention Biden in call with Ukrainian President

2 days after Trump called the accusation FAKE NEWS.

Just like he said stormy daniels was FAKE NEWS.

Just like he said russiagate was FAKE NEWS.

Get that through your heads trump morons. When trumps says FAKE NEWS that means it's TRUE.

#38 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2019-09-23 07:05 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

You really still think that Trump used Putin to get elected. That is amazing that after 3 years of investigations, 1000s of witnesses, over 40 million dollars in legal fees that people still think that. Amazing there can still be such a disconnect with reality.

#37 | Posted by fishpaw

It's amazing that all you have to do is read the mueller report to see that trump did know about, accept, and hide help from putin, even breaking the law to do so.

#39 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2019-09-23 07:05 PM | Reply

I consider your statement quite a joke as the President has been under one investiigation, or another retty much from the beginning of his presidency. Where have you been that you are not aware of that?

#32 | Posted by MSgt

You say that as if it's unfair. That's his own fault for committing crimes before he even took office.

#40 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2019-09-23 07:07 PM | Reply

Um Speak, he is still in office. These investigations are purely partisan and the outcomes prove it. This latest one is boomeranging like all the others and people like you are made out to be fools again. Maybe you should learn from it for once.

#41 | Posted by fishpaw at 2019-09-23 09:00 PM | Reply

Um Speak, he is still in office. These investigations are purely partisan and the outcomes prove it. This latest one is boomeranging like all the others and people like you are made out to be fools again. Maybe you should learn from it for once.

#41 | Posted by fishpaw

Maybe you should read the mueller report. You look like a moron acting like it exonerated trump. It proved he's a criminal.

#42 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2019-09-23 09:25 PM | Reply

" It proved he's a criminal.

POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY "

And yet your cowardly party won't impeach.

*yawn*

Get back to us when they do the right thing. Y'all's perpetual bitching about Trump's unlawfullness is falling on deaf ears after over two years. ---- or get off the pot.

#43 | Posted by goatman at 2019-09-23 09:47 PM | Reply

Get back to us when they do the right thing. Y'all's perpetual bitching about Trump's unlawfullness is falling on deaf ears after over two years. ---- or get off the pot.

#43 | Posted by goatman

Over half of my party's representatives want to impeach? How many of yours? ZERO.

Mathematically, that means my party is still infinitely more ethical than yours.

Tell us why it's up to dems to do the right thing. You acknowledge his corruption now so what's stopping you from helping to remove him?

#44 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2019-09-23 09:55 PM | Reply

"Mathematically, that means my party is still infinitely more ethical than yours."

For once you are right. I don't align myself with a political party. So mathematically your party is also infinitely more unethical than mine.

But there is no question your party puts itself over justice, or they would impeach.

#45 | Posted by goatman at 2019-09-23 10:02 PM | Reply

"Tell us why it's up to dems to do the right thing.
#44 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY "

If you have to question why you should do the right thing, you're as ------ up as Trump. That is not a question a righteous person would ever dream of asking.

Your colors are obvious.

#46 | Posted by goatman at 2019-09-23 10:05 PM | Reply

If you have to question why you should do the right thing, you're as ------ up as Trump. That is not a question a righteous person would ever dream of asking.

Your colors are obvious.

#46 | Posted by goatman

So what's keeping you from doing the right thing and opposing trump?

#47 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2019-09-24 11:50 AM | Reply

Your colors are obvious.
#46 | Posted by goatman

Should the House Dems decide to impeach after their "impeachment meeting" today at 4 pm, would you be more supportive of the Dem party?

#48 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2019-09-24 01:17 PM | Reply

Should the House Dems decide to impeach after their "impeachment meeting" today at 4 pm, would you be more supportive of the Dem party?

#48 | Posted by rstybeach11

That's a joke right?

He'll switch right back to defending trump with whatever talking points the con man releases today.

#49 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2019-09-24 01:19 PM | Reply

That's a joke right?
#49 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

Nope.

#50 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2019-09-24 01:20 PM | Reply

"Should the House Dems decide to impeach after their "impeachment meeting" today at 4 pm, would you be more supportive of the Dem party?

#48 | POSTED BY RSTYBEACH11 "

I'm not supportive of political parties, at least the big two. However, as I've stated many times, I'm in support of impeachment if it is warranted.

#51 | Posted by goatman at 2019-09-24 01:53 PM | Reply

I'm not supportive of political parties,
#51 | Posted by goatman

Do you think we're all as dumb as you? You attack dems all day (and I mean ALLLLLL day) EVERY day and never attack republicans. You can hide behind word games to say that doesn't mean you support republicans but it actually does. Repeating republican propaganda= supporting republicans.

IF impeachment is warranted? Does obstruction of justice not warrant impeachment?

#52 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2019-09-24 01:56 PM | Reply

I had a dream about GOAT last night. Really did. He looked smaller than he does on the internet.

#53 | Posted by Zed at 2019-09-24 01:57 PM | Reply

"Do you think we're all as dumb as you?
POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY"

I stopped reading there. I prefer adult conversation

#54 | Posted by goatman at 2019-09-24 01:57 PM | Reply

I'm in support of impeachment if it is warranted.

Cool escape hatch. Is it warranted?

#55 | Posted by JOE at 2019-09-24 02:04 PM | Reply

"Is it warranted?

#55 | POSTED BY JOE AT 2019-09-24 02:04 PM |"

Time will tell. I, like most Americans, do not have all the details.

#56 | Posted by goatman at 2019-09-24 02:09 PM | Reply

Another person who hasn't read the Mueller report. Cool!

#57 | Posted by JOE at 2019-09-24 02:11 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#ReadTheReport!

lol

#58 | Posted by nullifidian at 2019-09-24 02:13 PM | Reply

#ReadTheReport!

lol

#58 | Posted by nullifidian

Nulli LOLs at the thought of being informed.

#59 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2019-09-24 02:49 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I stopped reading there. I prefer adult conversation

#54 | Posted by goatman

Then you wouldnt debate like an 8 year old.

#60 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2019-09-24 02:50 PM | Reply

Adam Schiff @RepAdamSchiff

We have been informed by the whistleblower's counsel that their client would like to speak to our committee and has requested guidance from the Acting DNI as to how to do so.

Were in touch with counsel and look forward to the whistleblower's testimony as soon as this week.

#61 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2019-09-24 02:54 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2019 World Readable

Drudge Retort