To the contrary, reports indicate that officials on the National Security Council had grown concerned in recent months over the degree to which Trump and Giuliani have come to personally dominate Ukraine policy at the expense of other foreign policy officials.
So Biden and Obama driving it is just fine ...
The bias seeps through like a sieve, you just can't see it.
The unavoidable inference is that the request being made has nothing to do with the national interests such actions are supposed to advance, and everything to do with the president's own interests.
This is what I notice most about the article.... it believes, and iterates Trump is only speaking for himself.
He speaks for me too, I want to know why HunterBiden gets his position (April 2014) right after JoeBiden is in charge of Ukraine. Biden was the point man on Ukraine policy, yet he knew his son, Hunter, had no experience in the natural gas business. And he knew his son suffered from active drug and alcohol addictions that forced him into rehab over and over while sitting on Burisma's board. The younger Biden was discharged from the Naval Reserve for cocaine use only two months before he took this job.
So yeah I want to know WTH was going on..... Was Biden playing both sides? MrAnti-Corruption, while he shoe horned his son in for the TAKE from known corrupt company? Yes I would like to know this, there is more "evidence" that someone broke the law in that, than the Lawfare blog believed the dossier didn't lead to the FISA wiretaps.
If Senators can request write a letter to Ukraine's prosecutor general, Yuriy Lutsenko, expressing concern at the closing of four investigations they said were critical to the Mueller probe. In the letter, they imply that their support for U.S. assistance to Ukraine was at stake. Describing themselves as "strong advocates for a robust and close relationship with Ukraine,".
How is this any different? How about the author of pick apart that letter and a compare and contrast?
Its not hard to see the bias in this piece, by saying its only Trumps concern is an obvious one. The other is interpreting what Zelensky is saying, then quoting Trump, this displays my typical rule about contextomy, the writer has an axe to grind and by god you aren't going to get the facts.