"Riiiiiiiight. Each day more and more people come forward to be sworn, under penalties of perjury or worse, while you pretend they're the liars, and everyone who won't raise their right hand is telling the truth."
Well, I just saw Vindman lie - along with Adam Schiff as pointed out by Jim Jordan. If Vindman does not know the identity, there there is no issue telling the names of the people he spoke with. Same goes for Schiff. The only logical conclusion is that they do indeed know the identity and are currently lying about it - which is why Jordan called Schiff a liar to his face.
As for the rest, as I pointed out when this whole mess started, it comes down to a question of Trump's intent as the actions fit into a gray area. Using the Dems twisted logic, any action by Trump that helps him politically is a quid pro quo even if that action is also in the best interest of the country. By that moronic reasoning, Trump working on the USMCA with foreign leaders would be a quid pro quo with a foreign government as passing the USMCA would be a giant personal, political win for Trump. So, please explain how that is not quid pro quo under your new definition.
"Meanwhile, Nunes can't even refer to a decorated soldier without insulting his earned rank.
#100 | POSTED BY DANFORTH "
Well, I am glad that Nunes could get the Dems to finally respect our military. That lack of respect on the part of the Dems was present for years. Further, on the part of Nunes, it was clearly a brain fart, not an intentional slight. Personally, I find these titles ridiculous and un-American. We are all equal - leave your coplay character title name at home.