There is no ability to factually debate this - IT IS AN OPINION.
Except there is a factual record that proves the assertion to be unmerited and false as I indicated could be found at the linked source:
The hold on the security assistance to Ukraine could have been neither "thoughtful" nor "prudent," as the minority report alleges, because it was devoid of any policy purpose whatsoever. As the witnesses unanimously testified, in announcing the hold, President Trump made no attempt to explain what policy purpose it was intended to serve:
*"The [OMB] official said that the order had come from the President and had been conveyed to OMB by Mr. Mulvaney without further explanation. ... NSC counterparts affirmed that there had been no change in our Ukraine policy, but could not determine the cause of the hold on how to lift it." (Holmes at 21)
*"OMB did not really explain why they were taking the position, other than they had been directed to do so," and "all that representative of *OMB said was the President has instructed, through Mr. Mulvaney, that [ ] the military aid be suspended." (Hale at 82, 105)
*"OMB never [ ] provide[d] a detailed explanation for the reason behind the hold." (Williams at 92)
*"There was great confusion among the rest of us because we didn't understand why that had happened." (Kent at 304)
*"I was adamantly [ ] opposed to any suspension of aid, as Ukrainians needed those funds to fight against Russian aggression. I tried diligently to ask why the aid was suspended, but I never received a clear answer; still haven't to this day." (Sondland public testimony)
*"And I couldn't tell [the Ukrainians why there was a hold]. I didn't know and I didn't tell them, because [ ] there'd been no guidance that I could give them." (Taylor at 138)
*"Nobody ever gave a reason why ... . There should have been [an explanation], but there wasn't." (Volker at 122)
*"Q: Was there any reason provided by the OMB reps on anyone else at the meeting for the hold? A: No." (Morrison at 162)
The agencies involved "were just wanting to find out [why the freeze had occurred]. And they were in touch with OMB, and they weren't getting much information apart from the fact there was a freeze." (Hill at 226)
*"The funds were held without explanation." (Cooper at 45)
*"[B]asically we were trying to get to the bottom of why this hold was in place, why OMB was applying this hold." (Vindman at 181)
*"It wasn't clear where [the decision] was coming from as we pushed this into the PCC process, which is the best way to come to a decision, and if somebody is blocking this, they need to sort of show their hand." (Reeker at 167)
At the time the hold was announced, the only known person to have knowledge as to why the hold was being implement was, once again, President Trump himself. Not a single other government official was able to offer an explanation as to why he had done this.