1. What do the libs need to compromise on? Be specific.
Gun Control. Immigration.
Gun control is rich. Because it is conservatives taking the extremist view. Most liberals only want to close the loopholes (private party loophole) that allow people to get guns without a background check. And polls show that 60% of Americans believe that we should have stricter gun laws.
And immigration? Obama deported TONS of people. And liberals in Congress were perfectly willing to give more money to Border Patrol to secure the border. We just think a wall is a waste of money (and a terrible symbol). We also don't want to fund ICE because it STOPPED the moderate policy of prioritizing deportations for criminals and instead changed to the EXTREMIST position of deporting EVERYONE (even if they are not causing problems).
As pointed out by another poster, your definition of "compromise" is give me everything I want. Which, while wrong, is also ironic. Since Trump's view of "compromise" or "negotiation" seems to be "give them everything and get nothing in return" (see North Korea).
2. What are libs trying to destroy that you hold dear?
Black American Culture.
The Black American nuclear family
Any faith in religion by Americans
Need some more?
#68 | POSTED BY BOAZ
Lol. You elected Trump. That has done more to destroy what "you hold dear" than anything else. Can't speak much to "Black" points, though I am curious how Trump has helped them. "Christianity" and "Any faith in religion by Americans" have been hurt more by Trump and conservatives than anything else. You think ANY religion supports turning away refugees, or intentionally being cruel to children in order to convince their parents not to bring them here? Support for those things (or the people who do those things) by "religious" people is rightfully seen as hypocritical and ignorant. The only way that liberals are destroying religion is by encouraging people to be educated and to think for themselves, which is apparently anathema to religions and "faith".
Traditional Values? How do you define that? I recall pondering the hypocrisy of it during the 2016 election when Trump's top two surrogates were Giuliani and Gingrich. Between the three of them they had NINE marriages and SIX divorces (now SEVEN since Giuliani got divorced from his most recent fling). And the amount of adulterous relationships they had was innumerable. Is that what you consider "traditional values"? Actually, it is probably a pretty accurate representation of "traditional values", especially be conservatives, but those "values" are disgusting which is why most moral people nowadays want nothing to do with them.
I am not even sure I want to touch "Personal Responsibility". Trump is the epitome of NEVER taking responsibility for ANYTHING. And the Republican base is primarily made up of people like coal miners or factory workers who made poor career choices when they were young, and now want the government to subsidize (or impose tariffs) to protect their jobs. Instead of taking "personal responsibility" for their choices and learning a trade that is actually useful in today's economy.