Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, May 20, 2020

Former Obama administration national security adviser Susan Rice has called for the Trump administration to release transcripts of phone calls between Michael Flynn, her successor under President Trump, and then-Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"In the interest of transparency, Ambassador Rice again calls upon the Director of National Intelligence to release the unredacted transcripts of all Kislyak-Flynn calls," spokeswoman Erin Pelton said in a statement on behalf of Rice. "The American people deserve the full transcripts so they can judge for themselves Michael Flynn's conduct."
Trump's misuse of the new DNI has been using selective leaks trying to rewrite the history of why Flynn ended up in trouble in the first place. Since the information is still classified, none of the Obama officials are free to discuss the actual content of Flynn's conversations and why they rang alarm bells during the waning days of Obama's tenure as President.

If the appellate judges have access to these phone transcripts I think they will view Flynn's plea and admissions in a completely different light than that of someone claiming to be innocent because the FBI didn't have a material reason to ask him questions about these phone calls.

I think Judge Sullivan received clearance to either listen to the calls or read the transcripts which moved him to say Flynn's behavior amounted almost to treason. This is not going to end well for Trump, Barr, Shea, or Flynn unless the President can shut this down with a pardon before the judges dive into the actual details underlying Flynn's sworn pleas of guilty.

#1 | Posted by tonyroma at 2020-05-19 11:38 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Evan McMullin @EvanMcMullin - 14h

In this now declassified email that Susan Rice sent herself, we see that President Obama refused to request law enforcement investigations of Team Trump's known Russia ties and insisted that any actions be "by the book." Apparently, "Obamagate" means doing the right thing.

Of course today's Republican Party - controlled by Donald Trump's sociopathy - would try to imply that President Obama's express request that something be done "by the book" is itself a scandal on par with Watergate (smh).

#2 | Posted by tonyroma at 2020-05-20 07:41 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I hope Sullivan sends that piece of crap to prison. I know Donald Trump can pardon him but he would still have to live with the stigma of being treasonous and Trump would have to live with the stigma of pardoning such a piece of crap. It sort of makes Trump, himself, look treasonous which is actually what I believe to be true.

#3 | Posted by danni at 2020-05-20 08:25 AM | Reply

Danni,
If Trump pardons Flynn, I believe Flynn would be unable to claim 5th Amendment protection should he be called to testify before Congress.

I believe this would open him up to potential criminal contempt consequences for refusing to testify and potential perjury charges should he testify falsely.

If I am not understanding correctly, and I may be, I'm sure one of our Retort lawyers will correct me.

#4 | Posted by oldwhiskeysour at 2020-05-20 10:27 AM | Reply

If Trump pardons Flynn, I believe Flynn would be unable to claim 5th Amendment protection should he be called to testify before Congress.

Absolutely correct. Since Flynn would already be pardoned, he no longer would have a need for 5th Amendment protections for those offenses. This exception is likely the reason Trump hasn't pardoned Manafort or Stone either. Once pardoned they have to divulge what they know if asked by a recognized legal authority.

#5 | Posted by tonyroma at 2020-05-20 10:38 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

OWS and Tony, thanks for those thoughts, it hadn't occurred to me how a pardon might expose Trump, very interesting. This is almost an HBO series with all the twists and turns.

#6 | Posted by danni at 2020-05-21 08:24 AM | Reply

Why not release the transcripts? If there was no crime, there is nothing to hide. If Flynn is such a great guy, he will be pleased to see his discussions with the Russians brought into full light. On the other hand, if Mikey was practicing foreign policy without license, making promises which undercut the current administration's policies and making plans for future agreements, that might be considered, oh, treason...

#7 | Posted by catdog at 2020-05-21 01:07 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

The fact that these have not somehow leaked out is proof positive that there is no deep state cabal working against Diaper Dumper Donnie.

#8 | Posted by _Gunslinger_ at 2020-05-21 03:03 PM | Reply

No doubt a smoking gun.

#9 | Posted by fresno500 at 2020-05-22 08:12 AM | Reply

Look at the lack of GOP here to call for the Flynn transcripts to be released... they obviously know they support a traitor.

#10 | Posted by 503jc69 at 2020-05-22 09:31 AM | Reply

Won't release Flynn transcripts, won't release Mueller grand jury testimony. Yep, all sure signs of innocence and no collusion.

#11 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2020-05-22 09:46 AM | Reply

I still want to see the transcripts of the so-called Ukrainian "perfect phone call".

I've always wanted to see what a "perfect phone call" was like.

#12 | Posted by donnerboy at 2020-05-22 11:15 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2020 World Readable

Drudge Retort