Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, October 24, 2020

Senators Susan Collins (R., Maine.) and Lisa Murkowski (R., Alaska) voted on Friday against moving the Senate into an executive session to allow McConnell to expedite the final confirmation vote that is expected to seat Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court.



Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

We only need 2 more Patriots to stop this travesty from going down. Rand,Chuck,Ted,Mario, somebody please show some backbone and ethics here.

That woman is a nutter,totally unqualified for even the circuit court. SCOTUS, no way!!

#1 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2020-10-24 07:46 PM | Reply

Nope. Murkowski is voting yes. Another sellout who always says she'll stand up to trump, then never does. Lets see if her state has the brains to vote her our.

#2 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2020-10-24 08:27 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Alaska, I work all summer and collect unemployment all winter but i'm a self sufficient republican and did it all on my own.

#3 | Posted by bruceaz at 2020-10-24 09:03 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

These two weasels know their votes won't stop her confirmation. They're just trying to save their own butts.

#4 | Posted by Angrydad at 2020-10-24 10:58 PM | Reply

Why do people still pretend that she is not going to be confirmed? There is nothing to stop it.

#5 | Posted by REDIAL at 2020-10-24 11:04 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

Noooooooo,please,Gooooodd, Nooooooooooo!!

#6 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2020-10-24 11:54 PM | Reply

What are the qualifications necessary in the Constitution? Living and breathing?

You know there have been times when I had to be somewhere fast and I have thought pick up that panhandler at the freeway entrance so I can take the HOV lane , he qualifies.

#7 | Posted by bruceaz at 2020-10-25 12:08 AM | Reply

Aaaand here come the packed court.

15 won't be enough, I'm thinking upwards of 29, maybe 35.

I mean why the fnkc not?!

#8 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2020-10-25 12:38 AM | Reply

Your point? Mitch said no. He said no when lower courts were open

Didn't you watch the f^^^in debate? Trump, we filled hundreds of judgeships and Obama couldn't do it.

Because Mitch said no.

"Functioning Democracy" come up with a better description.

#9 | Posted by bruceaz at 2020-10-25 12:52 AM | Reply

Pack the courts Joe.
The supreme court is broken.

#10 | Posted by Docman at 2020-10-25 08:26 AM | Reply

Perhaps Roberts will have a little chat with her about how he won't allow HIS Supreme Court to be "politized."

In the meantime, Trump, having already lost two election fraud cases in a lower courts for lack of evidence, Trump is busy "manufacturing" phony intel from witnesses who are threatened with being fired, to prove his case in the Supreme Court and overturn the election.

#11 | Posted by Twinpac at 2020-10-25 09:30 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2020 World Readable

Drudge Retort