Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, October 27, 2020

Justice Brett Kavanaugh conjured up the specter of such a protracted battle as he argued in favor of allowing states to maintain firm deadlines requiring absentee ballots to be received by election officials on Election Day.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

I
Told
You
So

#1 | Posted by truthhurts at 2020-10-27 09:18 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

We really need to pack the Court.

#2 | Posted by Zed at 2020-10-27 09:19 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Not a lawyer here but his opinion seems to be late voting should not be allowed because people will claim something
Regardless of what is claimed isn't the potential for someone to make a claim irrelevant in a legal decision?
I mean people are equally likely to claim illegality in voting if otherwise valid votes are disallowed

This is a preview of ------- v Biden

------- will remain president truth hurts

#3 | Posted by truthhurts at 2020-10-27 09:23 AM | Reply

If Trump and the Republicans actually do try to steal this election we should riot all over the country, it's either that or kiss democracy good bye forever. If the founders could risk their lives for democracy we should be willing to do the same to defend it.

#4 | Posted by danni at 2020-10-27 09:30 AM | Reply

Revolute. What moral authority does America have to preach about democracy and freedom to Anyone?

Venezuela,Iran, they both observe the forms of democratic government as much as we do.

What authority besides force do we have to tell any other nation how to run their own country?

Yet we do.

Constantly,with great sanctimony and arrogance.

What a joke.

#5 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2020-10-27 09:46 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

After these last 60 days of constant focus placed upon how Trump and his minions intentionally dismantled the Postal Service, there is no reason whatsoever that anyone doesn't understand that today is the LAST DAY to place any ballot in the mail anywhere in the US. From tomorrow forward, all ballots should be taken to the nearest drop box available to those voters. Or those voters should make a plan to vote in person between now and next Tuesday one way or another.

From what I've seen all across the nation both in red and blue states, millions upon millions of Americans who originally intended to vote by mail have instead voted in person during what is now election season instead of simply one Election Day.

Kavanaugh's footnote should surprise no one. He articulates exactly what Trump has been saying all year. It's a technical argument based upon Bush v. Gore, where the SCOTUS ruled that only state legislatures have the power to set election laws, not state judiciaries nor the federal bench. So whatever the state legislature has mandated should be the controlling law regardless of pandemic, natural disasters or anything else that calls for modifications of existing electoral rules for ballot acceptance and counting.

The flipside of this is that if state laws have made allowances for late arriving ballots and for counting past Election Day, the SCOTUS is also bound to respect those laws as well. Or at least that's how I'm seeing it so far.

#6 | Posted by tonyroma at 2020-10-27 10:05 AM | Reply

I need a lawyer to help me out, but I seem to recall that one of the provisions of the Bush v Gore decision was that it couldn't be used as a precedent.

#7 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2020-10-27 10:08 AM | Reply

#7 Not entirely true. The precise quote you're referencing says "Our consideration is limited to the present circumstances, for the problem of equal protection in election processes generally presents many complexities."

This caveat is toothless because any elections-related litigation is going to be highly fact-specific. It hasn't stopped district and appellate courts from citing Bush v Gore in a variety of cases.

#8 | Posted by JOE at 2020-10-27 10:27 AM | Reply

Scalia should burn in hell. What a wankus. Barrett is his protege,LOL.

#9 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2020-10-27 10:32 AM | Reply

The conservative and originalist thing to do would be for SCOTUS to admit that Bush v. Gore was nonjusticiable and to refuse to grant cert on any case involving state election laws, which should be decided by state supreme courts. But Republicans and their judges are not conservatives, and they are not originalists either, only using the doctrine as an artifice when it advances their political goals.

#10 | Posted by JOE at 2020-10-27 10:33 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

Not sure how I feel about this.

Something post marked by Nov 3 should be considered valid.

However, if we find a pile laying around 30 days later, should it be counted?

I think the post-mark criteria and being counted within a reasonable time have to go hand-in-hand.

#11 | Posted by brass30 at 2020-10-27 10:39 AM | Reply

Duh? Ya think? That's been obvious for about 20 years. They are not originalist at all,whatever that even means. They are about obfuscation and deceit. They do what they want and find lame excuses,and BS "justifications" to make it look legitimate which it rarely is. Consistency is not their thing,the law is not their thing.

Getting what they want whatever it takes is their thing.

--------.

#12 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2020-10-27 10:40 AM | Reply

we should riot all over the country, it's either that or kiss democracy good bye
#4 | Posted by danni

If it comes to that democracy is already dead in this country.

#13 | Posted by SomebodyElse at 2020-10-27 10:40 AM | Reply

If you don't cheat to win, you're not trying hard enough?

#14 | Posted by hamburglar at 2020-10-27 10:45 AM | Reply

"If it comes to that democracy is already dead in this country."

"Total Collapse of Democracy So Horrifying America Decides it Hasn't Happened Yet"

- The Onion

#15 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2020-10-27 10:47 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

"I think the post-mark criteria and being counted within a reasonable time have to go hand-in-hand."

Which is essentially what Kavanaugh is saying.

So what are States supposed to do with Ballots arriving after election day postmarked too late?

#16 | Posted by eberly at 2020-10-27 11:14 AM | Reply

Imagine if Obama did this whilst wearing a beige suit?

#17 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2020-10-27 11:18 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

"I think the post-mark criteria and being counted within a reasonable time have to go hand-in-hand."
Which is essentially what Kavanaugh is saying.
#16 | POSTED BY EBERLY AT 2020-10-27 11:14 AM | REPLY

No sir. What he's saying is that if a ballot is postmarked before election day but arrives AFTER election day, it shouldn't be counted. Add this to the intentional slowdown of the mail due to Trump appointee decisions, and tons of folks could be disenfranchised through no fault of their own.

I think it's too late to vote by mail to guarantee your vote. Drop that ballot off at a ballot box or go in person ASAP if you don't want to face record crowds next week.

#18 | Posted by bartimus at 2020-10-27 11:29 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

So what are States supposed to do with Ballots arriving after election day postmarked too late?
#16 | POSTED BY EBERLY

That's not what was at issue in the case, but nobody has ever accused you of being on topic.

#19 | Posted by JOE at 2020-10-27 11:35 AM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 3

If it comes to that democracy is already dead in this country.

#13 | POSTED BY SOMEBODYELSE

I live in California.

In our country democracy is not dead.

#20 | Posted by donnerboy at 2020-10-27 11:42 AM | Reply

"What he's saying is that if a ballot is postmarked before election day but arrives AFTER election day, it shouldn't be counted."

really?

"That's not what was at issue in the case"

who cares? why don't you just not answer the question by not answering the question, lil joe?

I wasn't asking you anything

#21 | Posted by eberly at 2020-10-27 11:50 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

who cares?

Good point; nobody should be reading your off-topic gibberish in the first place. That's where i erred - hopefully others will learn from my mistake.

#22 | Posted by JOE at 2020-10-27 12:14 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"However, if we find a pile laying around 30 days later, should it be counted?"

Common sense would dictate that there has to be a cutoff after elections day but it does not need to be ON election day.

But common sense doesn't actually exist here in America anymore.

#23 | Posted by donnerboy at 2020-10-27 12:19 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I wasn't asking you anything

#21 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Unfamiliar with how blogs work?

When you post a comment on a blog like this ANYONE can respond to it.

Amazing huh?

The more you know!!

#24 | Posted by donnerboy at 2020-10-27 12:22 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 2

If only we could just get rid of those pesky ballots.

Everything would be just hunky dory in America.

#25 | Posted by donnerboy at 2020-10-27 12:23 PM | Reply

-Unfamiliar with how blogs work?

Maybe this one, considering that exchange.

Was my question too hard for you as well?

#26 | Posted by eberly at 2020-10-27 12:23 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"Common sense would dictate that there has to be a cutoff after elections day but it does not need to be ON election day."

I agree...otherwise the shennigans can continue and the longer it goes, the public trust in elections will deteriorate.

#27 | Posted by eberly at 2020-10-27 12:25 PM | Reply

When Orange Jesus loses in court he declares victory. He is already running victory ads on Facebook. Forget the polls. Look at Trump's behaviour and demeanor. It is the behavior of a man so far down in the polls and yet he knows he will be President for four more years. The Supreme Court is stacked and ready. Trump cannot afford to lose. His only choice is to win/steal the election.

#28 | Posted by iloveyou at 2020-10-27 12:39 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Last election, I stood in line to vote. When the deadline came for voting, the staffing at the polling place stood at the end of the line waiting.

When the cutoff time hit, they stopped anyone from joining the line. Anyone in front of the marker was in line timely and would vote.

Mail on time.

#29 | Posted by Petrous at 2020-10-27 12:39 PM | Reply

what will haplen now is that Post office workers can hide ballots with impunity. make no mistake, this will happen certainly, because of this opinion.

I predict Trump will be re-elected via 200-esque shenanigans. Kavanaugh has given express permission for this to occur.

#30 | Posted by e1G1 at 2020-10-27 12:57 PM | Reply

2000-esque

#31 | Posted by e1g1 at 2020-10-27 12:58 PM | Reply

Anyone else see the irony of a member of SCOTUS arguing the legislature should have final say over the state's Supreme Court?

#32 | Posted by Danforth at 2020-10-27 01:06 PM | Reply

In NY state ballots must be postmarked by Nov 3th and received by Nov 10th. They don't start counting the absentee ballots until after the polls close on election day. There is no way they will all be received let alone counted on election night.

#33 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2020-10-27 01:07 PM | Reply

Enough with the chicken little crap.

Trump is still losing in a landslide regardless of his cheating.
It doesn't matter what he is going to claim, it will be irrelevant.

Dems need to Pack the SC court and then impeach all of Trumps appointees off the bench, well, because they can!

#34 | Posted by a_monson at 2020-10-27 01:10 PM | Reply

However, if we find a pile laying around 30 days later, should it be counted?
#11 | POSTED BY BRASS30

Again, not at issue in this case, and counting that late would likely be illegal under any state's election laws, but let's pretend for a second that your question is relevant: If every ballot in that pile was lawfully and timely cast, and only the state's own organizational failures led to it being missed, what would you think? What if your ballot was in the pile?

#35 | Posted by JOE at 2020-10-27 01:10 PM | Reply

33

So New York can't announce a winner of their electoral votes for president (or anything else on their ballot) until Nov 10?

#36 | Posted by eberly at 2020-10-27 01:15 PM | Reply

His only choice is to win/steal the election.

#28 | POSTED BY ILOVEYOU

You can't always get what you want.

But. Sometimes you get what you need.

But. Then again.

Sometimes you can't get no satisfaction.

#37 | Posted by donnerboy at 2020-10-27 01:17 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

If someone has a lead bigger than the absentee ballots on hand, a winner can be announced. Otherwise probably not.

#38 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2020-10-27 01:18 PM | Reply

really?
#21 | POSTED BY EBERLY AT 2020-10-27 11:50 AM | FLAG:

This isn't an issue about ballots postmarked after election day. If you try to mail in a ballot after election day, I am fine with throwing those out; they don't follow the generally accepted rules of voting. However, this issue is about allowing states (Wisconsin in this case) to throw out votes cast prior to election day (and we'll know they were cast prior to election day due to their postmark being made on 11/3 or earlier). So basically a voter could vote by mail this week and still be disenfranchised next week if the post office delays their ballot. Because of changes like no more overtime for mail carriers and removal of sorting machines, it's a very real possibility that someone can follow all the mail in voting rules and still be disenfranchised. In a state that Trump won by 23,000 votes, this is a big deal.

Also, the twin reasoning that "Those States want to avoid the chaos and suspicions of impropriety that can ensue if thousands of absentee ballots flow in after election day and potentially flip the results of an election...And those States also want to be able to definitively announce the results of the election on election night, or as soon as possible thereafter." is not a proper reason to disenfranchise potentially hundreds of thousands of people. It's removing a Constitutionally guaranteed right because a) things might look bad and b) to time an announcement? Neither one of these is more important than protecting peoples' Constitutionally guaranteed right to choosing their representation.

#39 | Posted by bartimus at 2020-10-27 01:18 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Man, there are lot of people running their mouths about rules that don't give 2 ----- about rules.

They care about the results. Nothing more.

People crying about decisions like this are really just pretending to care about it only because they're conditioned to believe it's going to impact the results they want.

States need to have rules on mail-in votes, have cut-offs, draw lines, etc. on how and when they should be counted.

And after this election, when Biden wins the swing states by a decent margin (my prediction) then the same rules being cried about now will be just fine.....right after Biden is declared the winner.

#40 | Posted by eberly at 2020-10-27 01:19 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

So New York can't announce a winner of their electoral votes for president (or anything else on their ballot) until Nov 10?

#36 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Why do you ask? Is this a problem for you?

It's not Election Day any more. It's now election month.

I seem to recall one year not too long ago when we didn't know who was going to be President for months.

It also seems to me like democracy actually survived.

Somehow . Someway.

#41 | Posted by donnerboy at 2020-10-27 01:21 PM | Reply

And in my #40....I'm not referring to Bartimus, who makes a good point.

#42 | Posted by eberly at 2020-10-27 01:21 PM | Reply

"People crying about decisions like this are really just pretending to care"

This faux outrage ---- again?

I've been asking you since Trump's inauguration to grow up.

You can't.

It's sad.

You're sad.

#43 | Posted by snoofy at 2020-10-27 01:22 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

In most states there is a legal difference between an unofficial winner and the state certified winner, whio often isn't declared until days/weeks after the election.

#44 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2020-10-27 01:23 PM | Reply

What evidence exists that we'll have that many ballots postmarked Nov 3 (dumb ass rule, BTW...it should be postmarked at least a week earlier to be counted) and will flow in after a few days passed?

#45 | Posted by eberly at 2020-10-27 01:28 PM | Reply

"dumb ass rule, BTW...it should be postmarked at least a week earlier"

Why should votes be treated different than tax returns?

#46 | Posted by Danforth at 2020-10-27 01:29 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

State certification of a winner is what should be held to. Not who appears to be the winner on election night. Kavanaugh's reasoning isn't logically or legally sound. Determining a winner should not be about speed but about accuracy. Obviously there have to be cutoff dates, but that's what state certification deadlines are for.

#47 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2020-10-27 01:30 PM | Reply

"If you try to mail in a ballot after election day, I am fine with throwing those out;"

How far in advance are mail-in ballots available to folks?

#48 | Posted by eberly at 2020-10-27 01:31 PM | Reply

"Common sense would dictate that there has to be a cutoff after elections day but it does not need to be ON election day."
I agree...otherwise the shennigans can continue and the longer it goes, the public trust in elections will deteriorate.
#27 | POSTED BY EBERLY AT 2020-10-27 12:25 PM | REPLY

This is exactly what ------- is counting on. His minions will be doing the shenanigans.

#49 | Posted by truthhurts at 2020-10-27 01:32 PM | Reply

"So New York can't announce a winner of their electoral votes for president (or anything else on their ballot) until Nov 10?"

On the contrary: if their systems show one candidate leading by a half-million votes, and they still have 475,000 to count, they can announce.

#50 | Posted by Danforth at 2020-10-27 01:32 PM | Reply

Enough with the chicken little crap.
Trump is still losing in a landslide regardless of his cheating.
It doesn't matter what he is going to claim, it will be irrelevant.
Dems need to Pack the SC court and then impeach all of Trumps appointees off the bench, well, because they can!

#34 | POSTED BY A_MONSON AT

You are so wrong it is breathtaking, commonplace thought nowadays, but wrong nonetheless

#51 | Posted by truthhurts at 2020-10-27 01:34 PM | Reply

"Why should votes be treated different than tax returns?"

Why should votes be treated different than getting your drivers license renewed? or paying insurance premiums? or any number of requirements where the postmark is irrelevant...and the receipt IS relevant?

Because nobody cares if my tax return comes in a day late, except the IRS.

Because election contests need a clear end date.

#52 | Posted by eberly at 2020-10-27 01:34 PM | Reply

"and they still have 475,000 to count, they can announce."

But how do they know how many more to count?

Just Because someone requested a mail-in ballot doesn't mean that ballot is ever coming back.

#53 | Posted by eberly at 2020-10-27 01:36 PM | Reply

"Total Collapse of Democracy So Horrifying America Decides it Hasn't Happened Yet"
- The Onion

#15 | POSTED BY HAGBARD_CELINE

FYI

The actual onion link.

www.theonion.com

#54 | Posted by donnerboy at 2020-10-27 01:37 PM | Reply

"Just Because someone requested a mail-in ballot doesn't mean that ballot is ever coming back"

True. But if only 475K were requested, that's an easy call.

Except in Chicago, of course...

#55 | Posted by Danforth at 2020-10-27 01:41 PM | Reply

Forest for trees

While people argue this ----, republican legislatures will be deciding who the electors are and will vote for.

This is the POINT of this argument. To drag the vote tallying process out. To give cover to legislatures picking the winner instead of the popular vote.

The longer the vote tallying goes, the easier it will be for them to argue impropriety.

Starting on Nov. 4 you will hear countless stories of voting irregularity, of votes lost and found, of counting corruption. That is a given.

And the longer these disruptions take the better it is for the republicans.

There is a hard date in early December for the electors to be chosen. With vote tallying questioned the legislatures will chose their electors.

That is where the fight will be.

Vote early or on election day. Push the vote counting to be done quickly-storm over all of the republican objectives and declare a winner. Let the republicans whine about it.

UNFORTUNATELY

The Republicans control the counting in too many tight states.

#56 | Posted by truthhurts at 2020-10-27 01:42 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"nobody cares if my tax return comes in a day late, except the IRS."

Again, why should votes be treated differently?

"Because election contests need a clear end date."

Okay: Postmark, plus one week for delays via the USPS. Plenty of time to certify by the Constitutional deadline. Frankly, the idea a vote shouldn't be counted because DeJoy employed delaying tactics is abhorrent.

#57 | Posted by Danforth at 2020-10-27 01:45 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

I thought it was standard procedure but apparently it's not. I thought mail in ballots get counted only when the number of ballots outstanding is enough to cover the difference of the in person vote. Ballots need to be postmarked by Election Day and received no later than let's say 10 business days to qualify.

Seems fair to me.

#58 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2020-10-27 01:49 PM | Reply

So New York can't announce a winner of their electoral votes for president (or anything else on their ballot) until Nov 10?
#36 | POSTED BY EBERLY AT 2020-10-27 01:15 PM

The state board of canvassers isn't meeting to certify the state election results in New York until December 7th. People are used to instant gratification and announcement but there is no legal reason for that to occur.

#59 | Posted by JOE at 2020-10-27 02:12 PM | Reply

"nobody cares if my tax return comes in a day late, except the IRS."

In relation to that comment, if it is postmarked by the date to file you are in the clear. Doesn't matter if the GOP Post Office takes 6 months to deliver it.

#60 | Posted by GalaxiePete at 2020-10-27 02:19 PM | Reply

58

how does that work considering all of the contests on the same ballots?

I'm not up on how this works and it's confusing for me.........but what if a district court judge contest is extremely close and comes down to

#61 | Posted by eberly at 2020-10-27 02:29 PM | Reply

Judge Keg actually put it in writing! I and others have been saying this for the past few years, the GOP cares nothing about democracy, if they did they wouldn't make it so hard to vote. They care strictly about gaining and keeping power at all costs, including our democracy. They now see that their election schemes (voter suppression, intimidation, gerrymandering) are no longer effective, as their racist whites first, pro-Evangenital Xtian, anti-immigration policies are coming home to roost, they are quickly becoming a permanent minority party. So, they focused on the courts, where they can still enforce minority rule long after they are no longer an electoral threat. Judge Keg makes it clear, the GOP doesn't care about democracy, they don't care about elections, or votes from pesky citizens, they would prefer a Reichwing theocracy/oligarchy. They want us to be another one of those famous SHole nations.

#62 | Posted by _Gunslinger_ at 2020-10-27 02:33 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

This election will kill and maim lots of Trumpublicans who waited to vote in-person on election day to own-the-libs. No mask, no distance, COVID-19! Step right up.

#63 | Posted by getoffmedz at 2020-10-27 02:33 PM | Reply

"I'm not up on how this works and it's confusing for me.........but what if a district court judge contest is extremely close and comes down to"

I think counting mail ins would be triggered any time a race on the ballot comes within that threshold. Not 100% on how it's done.

#64 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2020-10-27 02:40 PM | Reply

#37

Donnerboy...it takes a lot of Stones to post a comment like that.

#65 | Posted by Danforth at 2020-10-27 04:59 PM | Reply | Funny: 2

good discussion here folks. Thanks.

#66 | Posted by eberly at 2020-10-27 05:03 PM | Reply

If Trump isn't losing the election on Tuesday night, by a substantial margin. He'll use the senate and Supreme Court to steal the election.

100% guaranteed.

It's why Coney being seated was crucial.

#67 | Posted by ClownShack at 2020-10-27 05:05 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"States need to have rules on mail-in votes, have cut-offs, draw lines, etc. on how and when they should be counted."

Not if I have anything to do with it.
~Judge Keg

#68 | Posted by Danforth at 2020-10-27 05:13 PM | Reply

This election will kill and maim lots of Trumpublicans who waited to vote in-person on election day to own-the-libs. No mask, no distance, COVID-19! Step right up.

#63 | Posted by getoffmedz

I'm counting on it.

#69 | Posted by billy_boy at 2020-10-27 06:09 PM | Reply

In 2000, lawyer Brett Kavanaugh argued in court that Florida should be allowed to count votes until Thanksgiving.

As a result, among other things, votes with no postmark and other anomalies were included in W's FL vote total. If those votes hadn't been counted, Al Gore would have won the presidency.

I'm surprised the GOP don't have a book for sale on Amazon called "How To Do Hypocrisy."

#70 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2020-10-27 08:48 PM | Reply

They're counting on Americans to have the memory of goldfish. They're counting on half the country wanting them to win and half being too dumb to stop them.

It's working.

#71 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2020-10-27 10:23 PM | Reply

Why should votes be treated different than getting your drivers license renewed? or paying insurance premiums? or any number of requirements where the postmark is irrelevant...and the receipt IS relevant?

#52 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Three Reasons:

1. Because the RIGHT to vote decides who makes laws to govern me. It's a bit bigger than a driver's license or insurance premiums.
2. I can pay my insurance premiums online or by phone. I can get my driver's license late if the mail has an issue. But if the mail is an issue and my vote gets there late, it simply doesn't count PERIOD.

3. BECAUSE TRUMP DELIBERATELY BROKE THE ------- POST OFFICE THAT NORMALLY DELIVERED MAIL WITHIN 1-2 DAYS, HE DID IT DURING A PANDEMIC, AND HE DID IT TO STOP MAIL-IN VOTING, YOU STUPID ------- SPOILED CHILD.

#72 | Posted by Sycophant at 2020-10-28 11:16 AM | Reply

nypost.com

#73 | Posted by Maverick at 2020-10-28 11:50 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

#73

Like quoting Tommy Flanagan... except he didn't lie as much.

#74 | Posted by Corky at 2020-10-28 11:58 AM | Reply

"Why should votes be treated different than getting your drivers license renewed?"

Oh great. Eberly is trying to deflect from Trump's malfeasance by narrowing the scope and asking off-topic questions.

Why should the mail itself be treated different in 2020 than in previous election years?

In this final push before the election, Eberly has really stepped up his role as Useful Idiot for the Riiight.

#75 | Posted by snoofy at 2020-10-28 11:58 AM | Reply

Trump Parade in NY

WOW!.... 85 miles worth...both directions. Seaford to Montauck, New York! There were 9,604 cars plus many supporters on side roads and on every overpass all the way out!!!

#76 | Posted by Maverick at 2020-10-28 12:13 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Corky,

he's not lying.. it's all verified via no solicited Text, emails and voice recordings

#77 | Posted by Maverick at 2020-10-28 12:14 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

This is status quo now. Every election is going to go down like this. Both sides encourage it and neither side tries to be the bigger person, so the people are just going to follow along. It's really a very easy concept to understand.

#78 | Posted by humtake at 2020-10-28 12:19 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

#77

Your life in the rwing Echo Chamber has made you deaf.

Not to mention that Hunter Biden isn't running for anything and that Trump is an obvious failure.

#79 | Posted by Corky at 2020-10-28 12:37 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

How far in advance are mail-in ballots available to folks?
#48 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Gosh. Good question. That could be easily answered with a quick google.

Let me ask you then.

How much as the "President" and his cronies slowed down the US Post Office and its processing of official election mail?

#80 | Posted by donnerboy at 2020-10-28 03:24 PM | Reply

Your life in the rwing Echo Chamber has made you deaf.

Poor poor Trumptilians.

Blinded by Science and made deaf and dumb by the Fixed News Echo Chamber.

Biden has got your backs!

He is gonna give you good affordable healthcare in spite of you.

#81 | Posted by donnerboy at 2020-10-28 03:28 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

This is status quo now. Every election is going to go down like this. Both sides encourage it and neither side tries to be the bigger person, so the people are just going to follow along. It's really a very easy concept to understand.

#78 | Posted by humtake

BOTH SIDES my ass. Which side tries to make it harder for the other side to vote?

Your cult leader was saying in 2016 the election was rigged when he thought he was going to lose.

It WAS rigged. It was rigged in his favor. Every election with the electoral college and gerrymandering involved is rigged.

#82 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2020-10-28 08:02 PM | Reply

Tired of the Democrats playing "Mr. Nice Guy"...
They have done it for all my life of 53 years.

Did the GOP play nice w Merrick Garland?
Did they play nice cheating Clinton out of her
victory last election? With Russia's help they
didn't. Does ANYONE think they would play nice
again if they retain the Senate, or if they again
capture the Presidency?

Hell No!

Scorched Earth Baby... I want to see the Democrats
STOP PLAYING TIDDLYWINKS, AND START PLAYING
GAME OF THRONES! The Republicans have been playing
GoT now for at least a decade. Time to show them
that elections have consequences...

#83 | Posted by earthmuse at 2020-10-29 06:25 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2020 World Readable

Drudge Retort