Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, April 07, 2021

They responded to the side of a small elderly Asian woman being assaulted by closing and locking the doors of the building they worked in.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"They responded to the side of a small elderly Asian woman being assaulted by closing and locking the doors of the building they worked in."

They are typical New Yorkers.

I remember being taught about this case back in high school:

en.wikipedia.org

38 witnesses and none of them did anything.

#1 | Posted by Family_values at 2021-04-06 09:46 PM | Reply

"You remember" - did you bother to read your own source?

Reporters at a competing news organization discovered in 1964 that the article was inconsistent with the facts, but they were unwilling at the time to challenge New York Times editor Abe Rosenthal. In 2007, an article in the American Psychologist found "no evidence for the presence of 38 witnesses, or that witnesses observed the murder, or that witnesses remained inactive".[7] In 2016, The New York Times called its own reporting "flawed", stating that the original story "grossly exaggerated the number of witnesses and what they had perceived".[8]

#2 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2021-04-07 01:14 PM | Reply

I see a lot of internet tough guys claiming they would intervene if they saw something like this happening. In real life, most of them would probably freeze if they saw another person being attacked by a large animal.

#3 | Posted by sentinel at 2021-04-07 04:32 PM | Reply

Not really, Sentinel. Just wrap a garment around your right hand and arm and grab a conveniently sharp or blunt object and start stabbing or beating them across the back of their heads. The throat is a particularly vulnerable spot.
So are the underarms, the kidneys, the brachial arteries and veins on the sides of their neck, and of course the crotch. If you can fight them head on, smash their nose with all your might. I causes a prodigious amount of blood and disorientation. Clap their ears and they won't be able to hear for several minutes. And don't be afraid to poke their eyes out. I'm talking street fighting. Usually, the assailant is after money or rape. Having another jump in to defend disrupts their animal mind and becomes a major disruption to their plans they hadn't thought of.

Or, if you're in Texas, simply whip out one of your concealed carry pistols and blow their head clean off.

Easy-peasey Glock'n easy.

#4 | Posted by madscientist at 2021-04-07 05:00 PM | Reply

The doorman weren't in a State of Shock they locked the doors.

#5 | Posted by Tor at 2021-04-07 07:34 PM | Reply

"#4 | POSTED BY MADSCIENTIST"

Why use a gun when a car antenna is infinitely more lethal?

#6 | Posted by Family_values at 2021-04-07 07:51 PM | Reply

Why use a gun when a car antenna is infinitely more lethal?
#6 | POSTED BY FAMILY_VALUES

Gotta be a sock puppet. Nobody opening an account in March of 2021 would know that reference.

#7 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2021-04-07 08:14 PM | Reply

"Gotta be a sock puppet."

Nah...just a chicken/troll too embarrassed to use their original handle.

#8 | Posted by Angrydad at 2021-04-07 08:23 PM | Reply

"Why use a gun when a car antenna is infinitely more lethal?"

Holy crap was that something goat man used to say?

#9 | Posted by Tor at 2021-04-07 08:48 PM | Reply

"Holy crap was that something goat man used to say?
#9 | POSTED BY TOR"

No - it was another poster but I cannot remember which one, Boyd maybe or something with zero in it?

#10 | Posted by Family_values at 2021-04-07 09:42 PM | Reply

Smokestacks on the moon.

#11 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-04-07 09:52 PM | Reply

"Smokestacks on the moon.
#11 | POSTED BY SNOOFY"

Yes - he was the slightly more sane version of you.

#12 | Posted by Family_values at 2021-04-07 09:55 PM | Reply

I thought it was Buffalo Bob.

#13 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2021-04-07 10:00 PM | Reply

Only slightly? Poor guy.

Let me guess -- BuffaloBob is on Boaz's server too!

#14 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-04-07 10:01 PM | Reply

It was Buffalo Bob. Jeez you guys are amateurs.

#15 | Posted by dylanfan at 2021-04-07 10:02 PM | Reply

Buffalo Bob sounds right.

#16 | Posted by Tor at 2021-04-07 10:46 PM | Reply

Almost all the asian violence in recent incidents has been black on Asian. The doormen were black.

Liberals only bring up race when it suits them.

#17 | Posted by boaz at 2021-04-08 09:06 AM | Reply

#17 | POSTED BY BOAZ

You're the only one bringing up two races. The rest of us are concerned for the Asian community regardless of who they're attacked by.

#18 | Posted by Derek_Wildstar at 2021-04-08 01:10 PM | Reply

You liberals like to over analyze everything, why are only blacks attacking asians? That isnt worth looking into?

#19 | Posted by boaz at 2021-04-08 06:42 PM | Reply

That isnt worth looking into?
#19 | POSTED BY BOAZ

You seem to have all the answers regarding why individuals in the black community behave the way that they do.

So how about you tell us.

#20 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2021-04-08 06:45 PM | Reply

Why make it about me? I just made an observation, which liberals like you wont be honest with yourself to make. If white men were doing this, it would be all over the news how racist, white men were killing asians. But since it's blacks doing the killing, they cant make a big deal out of this.

Hypocrisy and dishonesty at it's highest. How you people trust the liberal media is beyond me.

#21 | Posted by boaz at 2021-04-08 07:02 PM | Reply

Why make it about me?
#21 | POSTED BY BOAZ

Your posting history. Duh.qa

#22 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2021-04-08 07:10 PM | Reply

And I ain't no stinkin' lib, you smear monger.

#23 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2021-04-08 07:12 PM | Reply

And what in the HELL do you mean "You people"?!

#24 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2021-04-08 07:12 PM | Reply

How you people trust the liberal media is beyond me.
#21 | POSTED BY BOAZ

Everyone's point of view is valid, even if you disagree with it.
#20 | POSTED BY BOAZ
drudge.com

Hmmm...

#25 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-04-08 07:15 PM | Reply

How you people trust the liberal media is beyond me.

#21 | POSTED BY BOAZ

Because they're 'journalists' who report facts than right wing fringe idiots spouting nonsense

#26 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2021-04-08 07:21 PM | Reply

Because they're 'journalists' who report facts rather than right wing fringe idiots spouting nonsense

#27 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2021-04-08 07:21 PM | Reply

Because they're 'journalists'. This means that they report facts rather than right wing fringe idiots spouting nonsense!

#28 | Posted by Tor at 2021-04-08 07:27 PM | Reply

"The doorman weren't in a State of Shock they locked the doors."

Maybe not, but they were likely concerned for their own safety. The way some of these articles are framing it insinuates they may be just as guilty of a hate crime as the ------- who attacked her.

#29 | Posted by sentinel at 2021-04-08 08:29 PM | Reply

#29 | Posted by sentinel

I'm curious which articles you are reading. Pretty clearly they were concerned about safety - safety of who is somewhat up for debate. I would like to think I would have reacted by helping the woman in question.

#30 | Posted by GalaxiePete at 2021-04-09 03:15 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2021 World Readable

Drudge Retort