Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, July 24, 2021

A suspect linked to the Jan. 6 siege on the U.S. Capitol was caught this week after a match on the dating app Bumble turned him in to the FBI, according to a criminal complaint.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

There's a link to the FBI's criminal complaint in the article.

More from the article...

...Context: An unnamed Bumble user asked Andrew Taake of Houston, Texas, in January whether he was "near all the action," to which he said he had been pepper-sprayed by police after protesting the result of the 2020 presidential election.

  • Screenshots of the pair's chat indicate that Taake said he was "peacefully standing there" at the Capitol.
  • "About 30 minutes after being sprayed," he said of a selfie showing him wearing a gray beanie and a dark gaiter. "Safe to say, I was the very first person to be sprayed that day ... all while just standing there."...
  • After the tip, officials reviewed flight records, security footage and social media posts. A federal agent said images show Taake "using what appears to be a metal whip and pepper spray to attack law enforcement officers."


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2021-07-24 02:52 PM | Reply

@#1 ... A federal agent said images show Taake "using what appears to be a metal whip and pepper spray to attack law enforcement officers." ...

Another tourist doing tourist things...


#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2021-07-24 02:53 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Waaa we no likely facial rec.
~the criminal loving left

#3 | Posted by phesterOBoyle at 2021-07-24 08:10 PM | Reply

Well, when you think about it PhesterOBoyle, if he had been wearing a mask, some slut-pill popping bimbo might not have ID'd him.

#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-24 08:17 PM | Reply

@#3 ... Waaa we no likely facial rec. ...

That is not a correct interpretation of what is being said.

The problem with facial recognition is that it is not accurate.

Oddly, or not, for white people it is somewhat (emphasis on "somewhat") accurate. However, once one moves to other races, facial recognition tends to have serious difficulties. Serious Difficulties.

So your attempted dig at "~the criminal loving left" really just exposes your apparent ignorance of the problems with facial recognition.



#5 | Posted by LampLighter at 2021-07-24 08:24 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Speaking of facial recog... robots...

Robots rocking out...

Animusic 2
www.youtube.com

#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2021-07-24 08:35 PM | Reply

I assumed that this was a lone event.

He's the second insurrectionist who's been dumb enough to brag on Bumble and been turned in?

#7 | Posted by Tor at 2021-07-24 09:07 PM | Reply

@#7 ... He's the second insurrectionist who's been dumb enough to brag on Bumble and been turned in? ...

They seem to be proud of their attempted insurrection attempt, boasting of it to possible future mates.

I am reminded of a thread I posted a day or two ago about why some people can't get dates....


#8 | Posted by LampLighter at 2021-07-24 09:15 PM | Reply

This is what I'm talking about. 1/6 was contemptible. It was a riot. It was NOT an insurrection. We saw 8+ months of worse that was described as "fiery but mostly peaceful".

You lefties are pathetic. You have a truly scary partnership between an Executive branch and Big Tech to engage in a massive censorship campaign and it gets cheered on. Yet half of the threads on this site are about a former president who has been abolished from all social media platforms. That is pure chicken ----.

#9 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-24 09:27 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

@#9 ... It was NOT an insurrection. ...

Why wasn't a riot aimed to overturn the results of an election and aimed to hang the Vice President an insurrection?


... You lefties are pathetic. You have a truly scary partnership between an Executive branch and Big Tech to engage in a massive censorship campaign and it gets cheered on. Yet half of the threads on this site are about a former president who has been abolished from all social media platforms. That is pure chicken ----. ...

Really.

If you want to present a real gainsay, you have to dispense with the hyper-political stuff.

But I gotta ask, do you really think your comment represents any manner of discourse?

I mean, really....

Detached from reality comes to mind.


#10 | Posted by LampLighter at 2021-07-24 10:37 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

So THAT'S why they can't--------.

#11 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2021-07-24 10:48 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

P.S. - ---- you Slammer, you ignorant ----.

#12 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2021-07-24 10:50 PM | Reply

"You have a truly scary partnership between an Executive branch and Big Tech to engage in a massive censorship campaign and it gets cheered on."

Is this a reference to the time Bush banned photos of flag draped coffins?

#13 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-24 10:55 PM | Reply

It's kind of obvious at this point why Trump's remaining fanboys can't--------.

#14 | Posted by Tor at 2021-07-25 01:15 AM | Reply

Getting laid is nice, but it's not everything.

#15 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 01:16 AM | Reply

insurrection

noun
a violent uprising against an authority or government.

1/6 was an insurrection.

#16 | Posted by ScottE at 2021-07-25 10:41 AM | Reply

#16 then so were some of last summer's riots, going by that definition.

#17 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 10:50 AM | Reply

Too bad you didn't think of that until a year later.

#18 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 10:51 AM | Reply

#10 aimed to hang the VP? Do you have any evidence to support that? Lemme guess, you believe officer Sicknick was bludgeoned to death with a fire extinguisher ammirite

#19 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 10:52 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

#19 | POSTED BY SAMS AT 2021-07-25 10:52 AM | REPLY

Why are you still here?

#20 | Posted by Zed at 2021-07-25 10:55 AM | Reply

#10 aimed to hang the VP? Do you have any evidence to support that?

#19 | POSTED BY SAMS AT 2021-07

Videos and audios of the mob chanting "hang Mike Pence"?

#21 | Posted by Zed at 2021-07-25 10:56 AM | Reply

" 10 aimed to hang the VP? Do you have any evidence to support that?"

Well, the crowd chanting "Hang Mike Pence" would be a clue to most.

#22 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-25 10:56 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

The gallows was another clue.

#23 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 11:02 AM | Reply

10 aimed to hang the VP? Do you have any evidence to support that? Lemme guess, you believe officer Sicknick was bludgeoned to death with a fire extinguisher ammirite

#19 | POSTED BY SAMS

Haven't heard the chants of the mindless minions?

You could see them yourselves online but no worries ...

All the videos will be played over and over again for your enjoyment.

The hearings on the Jan 6th insurrection incited by Trumpy and his minions (that qtards don't want and are afraid of) are about to begin.

Stock up on the popcorn bro.

#24 | Posted by donnerboy at 2021-07-25 11:09 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

16 then so were some of last summer's riots, going by that definition.

#17 | POSTED BY SAMS AT 2021-07-25 10:50 AM | REPLY | FLAG:

I agree.

#25 | Posted by ScottE at 2021-07-25 11:12 AM | Reply

" aimed to hang the VP? Do you have any evidence to support that?"

Let's explore this, shall we?

There are only two possibilities: either Sams was not aware the crowd was chanting "hang Mike Pence" until this moment, or he was aware, and he's trying to gaslight folks.

Which is it Sams? Did you just find out, meaning you only watch the outlets that would never show that clip, or were you aware of it, and just trying to gaslight?

Woefully uninformed, or purposefully dishonest? Which one is it?

#26 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-25 11:20 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

#22. Not terribly different to chants of death to all cops followed by setting precinct stations ablaze that progressives cheered just a few months prior to 1/6.

#27 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 11:22 AM | Reply

#22. Not terribly different to chants of death to all cops followed by setting precinct stations ablaze that progressives cheered just a few months prior to 1/6.

#28 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 11:22 AM | Reply

#26. I saw the videos and I immediately condemned the actions and certainly didn't label it "mostly peaceful".

Notice when Ashli Babbitt was shot there was no return fire? Pretty difficult to carry out an insurrection against the most powerful government in the world without any firearms. The guy who shot up a congressional softball game committed a bigger assault on our democracy than those moron rioters on 1/6.

#29 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 11:27 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

" Not terribly different to chants of death to all cops"

Be sure to put those goalposts back where you found them. And don't forget to answer #26.

#30 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-25 11:28 AM | Reply

" I saw the videos and I immediately condemned the actions"

So we're you aware of the "hang Mike Pence" chant before today, or not?

#31 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-25 11:30 AM | Reply

^We're = were

#32 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-25 11:30 AM | Reply

Mike Pence: Hecklers brand ex-VP 'traitor' at conservative conference
www.bbc.com

Treason is punishable by death.

#33 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 11:33 AM | Reply

#9 | POSTED BY SAMS

I for one am genuinely shocked that you'd also be a closet insurrectionist.

Shocked!

#34 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 11:40 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

Why are you still here?

#20 | POSTED BY ZED

Because it's a pathetic loser?

#35 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 11:41 AM | Reply

Not terribly different to chants of death to all cops followed by setting precinct stations ablaze that progressives cheered just a few months prior to 1/6.

#27 | POSTED BY SAMS

It's actually quite different you disingenuous sack of ----.

#36 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 11:43 AM | Reply

"#22. Not terribly different to chants of death to all cops followed by setting precinct stations ablaze that progressives cheered just a few months prior to 1/6."

The importantly terrible difference? The truth.
The police murdered George Floyd, and then tried to cover up the crime.
Whereas the stolen election is an outright fabrication.

#37 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 11:43 AM | Reply

The guy who shot up a congressional softball game committed a bigger assault on our democracy than those moron rioters on 1/6.

#29 | POSTED BY SAMS

There is no requirement for weapons in an insurrection.

so STFU ------.

#38 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 11:43 AM | Reply

"The guy who shot up a congressional softball game committed a bigger assault on our democracy than those moron rioters on 1/6."

No he didn't.

One of them interrupted a softball game.
One of them interrupted the peaceful transition of power by our government.

Softball is not required for democracy to function.
The peaceful transition of power is required for democracy to function.

#39 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 11:46 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

"Pretty difficult to carry out an insurrection against the most powerful government in the world without any firearms."

No really. Trumpy tried to even the odds by throwing a wrench in the machine to creat chaos and by holding back the reinforcements it almost succeeded. They got inside and took over the capital (hasn't been taken since the war of 1812) in order to try and prevent a peaceful transfer of power.

So at that they succeeded (for the first time in history it was NOT a peaceful transfer of power in America) and almost succeeded in stopping and overthrowing our democracy. . Trumpy, being the incompetent fascist pig he is, didn't get enough minions in place in time. In other words he blew it. Because he is a moron thank the Gawds. And now all he does is whine about his loss. And unfortunately for you insurrectionists his former buddy Mike choose to follow the law and the constitution.

And sycophants like you continue carry his dirty water for him. The man is a fool.

And the man should be held accountable for all the damage he has done. He is a billionaire. He can easily pay for it. Right? Or are some men just above the law?

But no worries. The hearings begin this week bro. You I'll get your answers. Except for lies that the minions and theatrics from over on the GOO side.what are the GOP afraid we will find out?

Get your popcorn folks. It's gonna be a long hot summer.

#40 | Posted by donnerboy at 2021-07-25 11:46 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Pretty difficult to carry out an insurrection against the most powerful government in the world without any firearms."

No firearms on 9/11.

#41 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 11:48 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#9 | POSTED BY SAMS

I for one am genuinely shocked that you'd also be a closet insurrectionist.

POSTED BY JPW AT 2021-07-25

How many things is SAMS in the closet for?

#42 | Posted by Zed at 2021-07-25 12:18 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

I answered #26

#43 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 12:30 PM | Reply

#38. You're right, it is. By every metric last summer's tours were far worse.

#44 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 12:31 PM | Reply

#34. I condemned the riot from the moment of happened. You cheered months of riots with $2 billion in property damage, a number of people murdered and dozens injured.

Lemme guess, you took a piss on Dorn's grave.

#45 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 12:33 PM | Reply

#40. You are a drama Queen. You act as if Trump conspired with Russians to try and dig up dirt on Biden and use it as a pretext for the FBI to spy on his campaign and his presidency.

#46 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 12:35 PM | Reply

"I condemned the riot from the moment of happened."

Why? The police were protecting a murderer. You don't think that warrants a riot?

Is a riot never acceptable? Will you be condemning the Boston Tea Party and the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising next?

#47 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 12:36 PM | Reply

#47 you come up with the most bizarre comparisons.

Again, if you think you are being clever, you're not.

#48 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 12:38 PM | Reply

what are the GOP afraid we will find out?

Well, since congressional Republicans loudly and unequivocally condemned the riots I doubt they are afraid of what we will find out.

Which party is keeping all of the video footage from security cameras under lock and key?

#49 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 12:39 PM | Reply

" I answered #26"

You're lying.

I'll ask again, directly: were you aware of the 1/6 "hang Mike Pence". chants before today?

It's an easy yes or no question.

#50 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-25 12:41 PM | Reply

I sat through the fifty-minute video of the insurrection, and now I am watching the fallout happily, in lieu of watching the Olympics (which I will not be watching, anyway).
www.youtube.com

So far, fewer than 1,000 people who were recorded as having been there have been arrested. Gotta get 'em all!

#51 | Posted by john47 at 2021-07-25 12:42 PM | Reply

"congressional Republicans loudly and unequivocally condemned the riots"

Congressional Republicans participated in the riots.
Congressional Republicans provided material support to the rioters in the days leading up to the failed insurrection.

#52 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 12:44 PM | Reply

#50 Answered already. I watched the events unfold as it was happening, so yes, I heard the chants.

#53 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 12:48 PM | Reply

"Congressional Republicans participated in the riots. "

Which ones? BTW - it wasn't riots, it was a riot - singular.

"Congressional Republicans provided material support to the rioters in the days leading up to the failed insurrection."

Such as?

#54 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 12:49 PM | Reply

So far, fewer than 1,000 people who were recorded as having been there have been arrested. Gotta get 'em all!

#51 | POSTED BY JOHN47 AT 2021-07-25 12:42 PM

I've read that the estimated number of people who entered the building is around 800 or so. We could probably get a real accurate headcount if security camera footage were to be released to the public.

"There is no requirement for weapons in an insurrection.

so STFU ------.

#38 | POSTED BY JPW AT 2021-07-25 11:43 AM |"

And just how far are unarmed rioters going to get against Capitol Police who were armed and weren't afraid to discharge their weapons.

#55 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 12:52 PM | Reply

They got inside and took over the capital (hasn't been taken since the war of 1812) in order to try and prevent a peaceful transfer of power.

Sorta like breaking into the Capitol to try and prevent the swearing in of a Supreme Court justice.

Ever notice how nobody has set up a bail fund for the 1/6 rioters and certainly no Republican has promoted such a thing unlike our Veep promoting it for Minneapolis rioters and members of the Biden campaign team contributing to it.

You clowns are so fricking hypocritical when it comes to what happened last summer with what happened on 1/6 that pointing it out is like shooting fish in a barrel.

#56 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 12:55 PM | Reply

And just how far are unarmed rioters going to get against Capitol Police who were armed and weren't afraid to discharge their weapons.

#55 | POSTED BY SAMS

Jesus. You can see how far on video anytime that you like.

Idiot.

#57 | Posted by Zed at 2021-07-25 12:56 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Nothing you're saying matters in defining this as an insurrection.
You stupidly believe you can define the terms favorable to you, and ignore all the other plans, intent, and possibilities to overthrow the election?
Then you call yourself the winner?
The way it could have happened has been laid out repeatedly. This was an attempted insurrection and it failed. The fact that it failed, or was poorly planned in your mind doesn't change what it was.

#58 | Posted by YAV at 2021-07-25 12:56 PM | Reply

This repeated attempted false equivalence to BLM protests is also beyond stupid. I suppose it works for the mindless.
Disappointed that Scotte was that stupid, but oh well.

#59 | Posted by YAV at 2021-07-25 12:58 PM | Reply

get against Capitol Police who were armed and weren't afraid to discharge their weapons.

#55 | POSTED BY SAMS

Ashli Babbitt was a righteous kill. The example of her death in that precise moment probably saved the lives of many innocents and not a few of your friends.

#60 | Posted by Zed at 2021-07-25 12:58 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

I don't give a ---- what you call it.

It was most certainly a riot. People have been rightly arrested and charged.

By all metrics the riots of last summer that you surely cheered were exponentially worse.

#61 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 12:59 PM | Reply

"Ashli Babbitt was a righteous kill."

Was it? How come no crowd control measures were employed? Some tear gas would have cleared the people out of there real quick.

Lemme guess, the Scalise shooting was righteous as well amirite.

#62 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 01:01 PM | Reply

"You clowns are so fricking hypocritical when it comes to what happened last summer with what happened on 1/6 that pointing it out is like shooting fish in a barrel."

Yup.

Breaking into and destroying Federal property is only bad if it's done by right-wing rioters.

All last summer rioters in Portland were setting the city on fire nightly.

Most of our friends here blamed Trump for sending DHS to protect Federal property, stating that he was just inflaming the situation.

Maybe the Capitol Police should have simply escorted the politicians out and given the building to the rioters. You know...so as not to inflame them.

#63 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 01:01 PM | Reply

I'd say Babbitt might have been a righteous kill if the officer issued warnings that he was going to shoot and those warnings were ignored.

Did he?

I don't know. I sure hope he did. I'm guessing security camera footage would probably answer that question.

#64 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 01:03 PM | Reply

"Disappointed that Scotte was that stupid, but oh well."

It's pretty clear which side his bread is buttered on.

#65 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 01:08 PM | Reply

#63 Rioters seized control of several city blocks for over a week, but that apparently was no big deal compared to 1/6.

#66 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 01:09 PM | Reply

It was most certainly a riot. People have been rightly arrested and charged.
By all metrics the riots of last summer that you surely cheered were exponentially worse.

#61 | POSTED BY SAMS

Wrong.

The protests last summer included some criminal activity that should be punished.

What happened on 1/6 was an attempt to overthrow the presidential election-you know, insurrection. You know, like what happened in the winter and spring of 1861 when traitors attempted to overthrow the US government in numerous states.

Apples and Oranges one might say

#67 | Posted by truthhurts at 2021-07-25 01:09 PM | Reply

#63 Rioters seized control of several city blocks for over a week, but that apparently was no big deal compared to 1/6.

#66 | POSTED BY SAMS

If the protestors were successful on 1/6 the results of the presidential election would have been nullified (to educate you they were trying to destroy the ballots that were being counted) and would have killed numerous members of congress and the VP.

So yes, protestors occupying some streets is much much much much less of a deal than what happened on 1/6.

But you know that.

#68 | Posted by truthhurts at 2021-07-25 01:12 PM | Reply

Apples and oranges. Agreed. The summer riots were far, far worse by every metric - looting, arson, murders, assaults, total property damage. And, because Dems in several cities caved and not only joined in the condemnation of police but in some cases severely cut police funding. It's been a strong contributing factor to this huge surge in both crime and violence, including murder.

1/6 was an isolated incident without long term repercussions.

#69 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 01:12 PM | Reply

"Breaking into and destroying Federal property is only bad if it's done by right-wing rioters."

Disrupting the peaceful transition of power was only done by right-wing insurrectionists.

#70 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 01:15 PM | Reply

"All last summer rioters in Portland were setting the city on fire nightly."

LOL. The city got set on fire nightly, huh? And they managed to rebuild the city every day, only to have it set on fire that night?

#71 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 01:16 PM | Reply

This repeated attempted false equivalence to BLM protests is also beyond stupid. I suppose it works for the mindless.
Disappointed that Scotte was that stupid, but oh well.

#59 | POSTED BY YAV AT 2021-07-25 12:58 PM | REPLY

WTF? I never equated them. I agreed that some of the "protests" were indeed insurrections.

#72 | Posted by ScottE at 2021-07-25 01:18 PM | Reply

"And, because Dems in several cities caved and not only joined in the condemnation of police but in some cases severely cut police funding"

You don't condemn the police who aided and abetted a police officer who committed murder?
You support funding the police who aided and abetted a police officer who committed murder?

The only reasonable conclusion here is you support the police officer who committed murder.

#73 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 01:18 PM | Reply

Apples and oranges. Agreed. The summer riots were far, far worse by every metric - looting, arson, murders, assaults, total property damage. And, because Dems in several cities caved and not only joined in the condemnation of police but in some cases severely cut police funding. It's been a strong contributing factor to this huge surge in both crime and violence, including murder.
1/6 was an isolated incident without long term repercussions.

#69 | POSTED BY SAMS

Every metric, but one, the most important one. the intent and goal of the protestors on the one hand and the insurrectionists on the other.

During the summer the intent was police reform.

On 1/6 the intent was to overthrow the presidential election.

Will you admit that according to that metric 1/6 was far far far worse? I will gladly agree that anyone who committed a crime during the summer protests should be held accountable.

As an aside, most of the killings during the summer protests were done by either right wingers or cops, just saying.

www.theguardian.com

#74 | Posted by truthhurts at 2021-07-25 01:21 PM | Reply

1/6 was an isolated incident without long term repercussions.

#69 | POSTED BY SAMS

No it wasn't. You know how I know?

Idiot "patriots" like you are trying to hard to downplay it.

#75 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 01:21 PM | Reply

Why? The police were protecting a murderer. You don't think that warrants a riot?

#47 | POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2021-07-25 12:36 PM | REPLY |

So you're all for vigilante justice?

#76 | Posted by ScottE at 2021-07-25 01:23 PM | Reply

"1/6 was an isolated incident without long term repercussions."

Signed,
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer
www.youtube.com

#77 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 01:25 PM | Reply

One of them interrupted a softball game.
One of them interrupted the peaceful transition of power by our government.
Softball is not required for democracy to function.
The peaceful transition of power is required for democracy to function.

#39 | POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2021-07-25 11:

Both events were terrorism.
Would you agree?

#78 | Posted by ScottE at 2021-07-25 01:26 PM | Reply

"So you're all for vigilante justice?"

I'm for justice.

#79 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 01:30 PM | Reply

1/6 was an isolated incident without long term repercussions.

#69 | POSTED BY SAMS

If ignorance is bliss then you must be a very very happy insurrectionist.

#80 | Posted by donnerboy at 2021-07-25 01:30 PM | Reply

Both events were terrorism.
Would you agree?
#78 | POSTED BY SCOTTE

Sure, why not?

James Hodgkinson was a terrorist who acted alone and was universally condemned by politicians of all stripes.
Ashli Babbitt was a terrorist supported by thousands and her actions are seen as justified by countless Republicans.
Would you agree?

#81 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 01:35 PM | Reply

" Both events were terrorism. Would you agree?"

Rand Paul wouldn't agree ... at least not until that day.

Before that, he was happy to retweet Judge Napolitano:
@Judgenap: Why do we have a Second Amendment? It's not to shoot deer. It's to shoot at the government when it becomes tyrannical!

Rand never imagined he was one of the tyrants.

#82 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-25 01:38 PM | Reply

#75. Downplay it? It's called putting it into perspective. You idiots are the ones trying to make it the biggest assault on Democracy in the history of mankind.

This has become the left's Benghazi

#83 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 01:40 PM | Reply

"I watched the events unfold as it was happening, so yes, I heard the chants."

So when you demanded proof of some rioters going after Pence, you were just gaslighting; you knew the truth all along.

Intellectually dishonest POS.

#84 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-25 01:45 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"You idiots are the ones trying to make it the biggest assault on Democracy in the history of mankind."

What's this? It was an assault on Democracy itself? But apparently not the biggest in world history...
Maybe you could go ahead and stack rank all the assault on American Democracy, and let us know where this one stands.
Thanks in advance!

#85 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 01:46 PM | Reply

"Disrupting the peaceful transition of power was only done by right-wing insurrectionists."

Disrupted?

Did the duly elected president not assume that role on the assigned date?

These people were idiots. Had they done some research, they would have known that, even in the event that there was a question, Nancy Pelosi would have become the acting president until such time that the issue would have been resolved. But there was no constitutional path for DJT to remain president past noon on 20 Jan. Period.

You might be making the argument that people should be punished for their political views, but in that case, wouldn't the rioters in Portland be subject to the same scrutiny? Their views are as vile as those who stormed the Capitol.

#86 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 01:47 PM | Reply

I'm for justice.

#79 | POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2021-07-25 01:30 PM | REPLY

And justice was served as it should have been....not by a mob.

James Hodgkinson was a terrorist who acted alone and was universally condemned by politicians of all stripes.
Ashli Babbitt was a terrorist supported by thousands and her actions are seen as justified by countless Republicans.
Would you agree?

#81 | POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2021-07-25

Absolutely, and I gave my opinion on those who participated in 1/6. You can probably guess what I think about their supporters.

To be clear in most situations I don't believe violence is the answer.

#87 | Posted by ScottE at 2021-07-25 01:48 PM | Reply

The question with Babbit is how was an unarmed woman deemed to be such an imminent physical threat that the use of lethal force was needed.

Progressives were outraged last summer when police used pepper spray on rioters. That was supposedly bad but fatally shooting a different rioter was met with cheers. I don't know how progressives aren't thoroughly embarrassed by espousing such blatant double standards.

#88 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 01:48 PM | Reply

"Disrupted?"

Disrupted.

"Did the duly elected president not assume that role on the assigned date?"

He did, but Congress was only able to appoint him to that role after the disruption ended.

#89 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 01:49 PM | Reply

This has become the left's Benghazi

#83 | POSTED BY SAMS

How long have you had this problem with PE ... Premature -----------.

#90 | Posted by donnerboy at 2021-07-25 01:49 PM | Reply

#84 you are equating a stupid chant with actual action. You are one stupid POS.

#91 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 01:50 PM | Reply

"And justice was served as it should have been....not by a mob."

Not really. Not entirely.
The police who were accessories to murder are still free.
Taking several steps back, the unjust racial animus which pervades policing persists.

#92 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 01:50 PM | Reply

"To be clear in most situations I don't believe violence is the answer."

Do you support the Second Amendment, because it green-lights violence as the answer.
(That's a rhetorical question, intended to provoke personal reflection.)

#93 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 01:52 PM | Reply

" you are equating a stupid chant with actual action"

You're pretending they wouldn't have carried it out, something the Secret Service would disagree with.

But you're just trying to avoid admitting you got caught gaslighting, like the intellectually dishonest POS you are.

#94 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-25 01:52 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I'm guessing we will see some of these idiots convicted for sedition ...

Any takers?

#95 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 01:52 PM | Reply

"Absolutely, and I gave my opinion on those who participated in 1/6. You can probably guess what I think about their supporters."

I can't guess anything about you, certainly not what do you think about their supporters.
Let's start with: Who are their supporters: Is Ted Cruz one? Marjorie Taylor Greene? President Donald J. TRUMP?

#96 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 01:54 PM | Reply

#94. Like I said, if we see some sedition convictions then yeah, I'll see it your way. You see, I live in a factual world where I seek actual evidence as opposed to a lying POS such as yourself.

#97 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 01:54 PM | Reply | Funny: 2

"LOL. The city got set on fire nightly, huh? And they managed to rebuild the city every day, only to have it set on fire that night?"

Nope.

A lot of businesses decided that it wasn't worth it to try and rebuild.

Here is a summary of all the attacks and destruction through 07 Oct 2020.

golocal.solari.com

#98 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 01:55 PM | Reply

"you are equating a stupid chant with actual action"

Death to America!

#99 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 01:55 PM | Reply

"That was supposedly bad but fatally shooting a different rioter was met with cheers. I don't know how progressives aren't thoroughly embarrassed by espousing such blatant double standards."

Met with cheers?

Quite a few people here thought that the Capitol Police didn't shoot enough people.

Maybe the one time they come out in favor of the Police.

#100 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 01:56 PM | Reply

" You're pretending they wouldn't have carried it out, something the Secret Service would disagree with."

Impossible to prove either way. It's speculative.

#101 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 01:56 PM | Reply

"Death to America!"

"We don't want Biden, we want revenge!"

www.bing.com

#102 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 01:58 PM | Reply

"Whaaa! My mask is fogging up my glasses because I am an ignorant moron and can't figure out how to use a mask!"

-mythbimbo.

(No citations required)

#103 | Posted by donnerboy at 2021-07-25 02:01 PM | Reply

" Impossible to prove either way."

Nonsense. The footage of the Secret Service spiriting Pence away proves it.

It takes a real moron to put together "hang Mike Pence", a gallows built, and the Secret Service taking Mike Pence to an undisclosed location ... and come away unsure.

You're either being purposely stupid, or it comes naturally to you.

#104 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-25 02:03 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

"That was supposedly bad but fatally shooting a different rioter was met with cheers. I don't know how progressives aren't thoroughly embarrassed by espousing such blatant double standards."
Met with cheers?
Quite a few people here thought that the Capitol Police didn't shoot enough people.
Maybe the one time they come out in favor of the Police.

#100 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

If killing a few insurrectionists would have prevented ------- from declaring marshal law and remaining a dictator, well I would have been fine with that.

Now when police kneel on a man's neck until he dies, I have a different issue with that action

#105 | Posted by truthhurts at 2021-07-25 02:03 PM | Reply

"A lot of businesses decided that it wasn't worth it to try and rebuild."

From your link: "Law Enforcement Infrastructure and Personnel were the primary targets."
Also from your link: "Portland protests have cost local businesses $23M so far"

From Google: "The police bureau's budget has gone from $214.9 million in 2017, to $231.6 million in 2018 to $241.5 million in 2019." www.oregonlive.com

I have a clever idea how businesses can be made whole.
Want to guess what it is?

#106 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 02:03 PM | Reply

You see, I live in a factual world where I seek actual evidence as opposed to a lying POS such as yourself.

#97 | POSTED BY SAMS

LOL

I don't care who you are.

That's some funny stuff right there.

#107 | Posted by donnerboy at 2021-07-25 02:04 PM | Reply

#106

Brilliant post. Nice research, too.

#108 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-25 02:05 PM | Reply

" You're pretending they wouldn't have carried it out, something the Secret Service would disagree with."
Impossible to prove either way. It's speculative.

#101 | POSTED BY SAMS A

The Secret Service errs on the side of caution when speculating about an attack on a VIP. Want to test that out? Try charging at Kamala Harris and see where that lands you.

#109 | Posted by truthhurts at 2021-07-25 02:06 PM | Reply

Not really. Not entirely.
The police who were accessories to murder are still free.
Taking several steps back, the unjust racial animus which pervades policing persists.

#92 | POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2021-07-25 01:50 PM

They've all been charged which is a whole lot better than the William Jennette killing.
No officer has been charged or reprimanded, and no settlement to the family.

You and I disagree on the racial component of police brutality.

#110 | Posted by ScottE at 2021-07-25 02:06 PM | Reply

You're either being purposely stupid, or it comes naturally to you.

#104 | POSTED BY DANFORTH

Purposely divisive. It's the pooty poot plan. Divide weaken create chaos undermine democracy and conquer from within. And it almost worked too! It still could. We are not out of danger. Keep your powder dry minute men. You know who you are.

#111 | Posted by donnerboy at 2021-07-25 02:10 PM | Reply

You and I disagree on the racial component of police brutality.
#110 | POSTED BY SCOTTE

We do? If you think blacks don't get more police brutality, then we do in fact disagree.

Can I see your numbers? Or is this a gut feeling thing for you?

#112 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 02:14 PM | Reply

Snoofy, you don't remember my previous opinion because you specifically asked me to repeat it in another thread?

I said they were traitors to this country and terrorists....you remember now. Their supporters are un-American at the least.

And yes I support the Second Amendment.

As I said I don't believe violence is the answer in most situations, but when it is the answer it's the only answer.

#113 | Posted by ScottE at 2021-07-25 02:17 PM | Reply

" Like I said, if we see some sedition convictions then yeah, I'll see it your way."

Nonsense. You'll be hiding behind yet another different handle, and still gaslighting, like the intellectual midget you are.

#114 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-25 02:17 PM | Reply

Or is this a gut feeling thing for you?

#112 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

From the rear end of his gut maybe.

In other words ... His lying arse.

Obviously.

#115 | Posted by donnerboy at 2021-07-25 02:18 PM | Reply

I don't think he's lying. I just think he's wrong.

#116 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 02:19 PM | Reply

You act as if Trump conspired with Russians to try and dig up dirt on Biden and use it as a pretext for the FBI to spy on his campaign and his presidency.

#46 | POSTED BY SAMS

Not sure where you think you are going with this crap. It is not an "act".

It actually happened though you have a few facts distorted. Did you not know Trumpy had his personal lawyer in Ukraine doing that very thing? Or are you that ignorant of the facts?

#117 | Posted by donnerboy at 2021-07-25 02:24 PM | Reply

"If killing a few insurrectionists would have prevented ------- from declaring marshal law and remaining a dictator, well I would have been fine with that."

None of that happened.

That being said, I don't disagree with you. Smoking a dude or two sends a message about the severity of what's going on.

Had Portland PD smoked a couple of rioters early on, it's a safe bet they wouldn't have been out setting the city on fire for 120 straight days.

#118 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 02:26 PM | Reply

"I have a clever idea how businesses can be made whole. Want to guess what it is?"

Is it smoke a few Antifa -------?

If they went out knowing that they may die for throwing a molotov cocktail, maybe they would choose not to throw molotov cocktails.

#119 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 02:28 PM | Reply

You and I disagree on the racial component of police brutality.
#110 | POSTED BY SCOTTE
We do? If you think blacks don't get more police brutality, then we do in fact disagree.
Can I see your numbers? Or is this a gut feeling thing for you?

#112 | POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2021-07-25 02:14 PM | REPLY |

We've been over this too many times on too many threads.

There's a lot of folks here that believe whites don't face police brutality despite the ample evidence.
How many times have you heard people say the what happened to George Floyd wouldn't happen to a white person....but it did three weeks before the Floyd killing.

#120 | Posted by ScottE at 2021-07-25 02:30 PM | Reply

"The police who were accessories to murder are still free. Taking several steps back, the unjust racial animus which pervades policing persists."

Are we still talking Portland?

Because in Portland, BLM wants nothing to do with a bunch of prviledged white anti-capitalists.

Sorry Snoof. If you want to riot on behalf of BLM, don't do it in Portland. Your people are PNG as far as that goes.

#121 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 02:31 PM | Reply

See what I mean Snoofy...Donner is one of them.

#122 | Posted by ScottE at 2021-07-25 02:31 PM | Reply

"Had Portland PD smoked a couple of rioters early on, it's a safe bet they wouldn't have been out setting the city on fire for 120 straight days."

So, you want like the police to use deadly force to prevent property damage, or are you just spitballing?

Also: What happened to stop it on Day 121, and why didn't they just do that on Day 1?

#123 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 02:32 PM | Reply

"There's a lot of folks here that believe whites don't face police brutality despite the ample evidence."

No there aren't.

What there is is people like me, who think whites face less.

#124 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 02:33 PM | Reply

I condemned the riot from the moment of happened. You cheered months of riots with $2 billion in property damage, a number of people murdered and dozens injured.

If you have to lie you've already lost.

Idiot.

#125 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 02:34 PM | Reply

#120

Yeah.

GF was a drug addict with a violent criminal history. Yet now he's a martyr. A hero.

If you want to get in to cops killing black people, what about Philando Castille?

Nobody is saying his name.

At least Breonna Taylor made the news. To me, that's the best example of bad LE practices. Almost like something out of "The Wire."

But I doubt that the rioters in Portland knew, or cared, who any of them were.

#126 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 02:35 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"How many times have you heard people say the what happened to George Floyd wouldn't happen to a white person....but it did three weeks before the Floyd killing."

Equating those two does not seem reasonable.
Was there a bystander filming both in public?

#127 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 02:36 PM | Reply

"So, you want like the police to use deadly force to prevent property damage, or are you just spitballing?"

Not really.

That would be your bestie Truthhurts

#105

#128 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 02:37 PM | Reply

See what I mean Snoofy...Donner is one of them.

#122 | POSTED BY SCOTTE

Oh noes!! I am one of Them!!!!

And therein lies the root of the problem.

The Other.

We must be afraid and we must demonize the Other.

Because. They are "different".

THAT is exactly what monkeys do.

Humans should be able to better.

#129 | Posted by donnerboy at 2021-07-25 02:40 PM | Reply

"Also: What happened to stop it on Day 121, and why didn't they just do that on Day 1?"

It didn't stop on day 121.

It's still going on.

It's just not happening every single night, as it was last summer.

#130 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 02:40 PM | Reply

And just how far are unarmed rioters going to get against Capitol Police who were armed and weren't afraid to discharge their weapons.

#55 | POSTED BY SAMS

The insurrection crowd was overwhelmingly larger than the police. If they had started shooting would that have stopped it? Maybe.

Or would they have gotten a few before being mobbed, beaten to death and having the rioters take their weapons?

As it stands they clearly were afraid to discharge their weapons considering only one person was shot after she attempted to force entry into a restricted place that was actively under evacuation.

Try again.

#131 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 02:41 PM | Reply

"Not really."

So then why'd you bring it up? To equate an attack on the government with "property damage" apparently.

#132 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 02:42 PM | Reply

Was it? How come no crowd control measures were employed? Some tear gas would have cleared the people out of there real quick.
Lemme guess, the Scalise shooting was righteous as well amirite.

#62 | POSTED BY SAMS

No wonder you whine so much about being called an idiot or a moron.

It's so obvious even that little brain of yours can recognize it.

#133 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 02:43 PM | Reply

"Two-thirds want BLM riots probed, more than Jan. 6"

Far more voters want the race riots of 2020 investigated than the Jan. 6 Capitol protests, including overwhelming majorities of blacks and Hispanics.

In a new Rasmussen Reports survey that challenges the media's theme about the public's view of both events, majorities of likely voters also back police and reject suggestions of racism by law enforcement.

And in one example of that, 65% disagreed with Black Lives Matter activists who have claimed that Old Glory and the pro-police "Thin Blue Line" flags are symbols of racism, said the survey done with the National Police Association.

Overall, 66% said that they want the Black Lives Matter riots investigated. According to the survey, there were 574 violent clashes and over 2,000 police were injured. Just 49% said they support House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's partisan investigation of the Jan. 6 riots.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

#134 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 02:43 PM | Reply

Maybe the Capitol Police should have simply escorted the politicians out and given the building to the rioters. You know...so as not to inflame them.

#63 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

That's actually pretty much what happened.

#135 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 02:44 PM | Reply

"In a new Rasmussen Reports survey"

LOL

#136 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 02:44 PM | Reply

Every metric, but one, the most important one. the intent and goal of the protestors on the one hand and the insurrectionists on the other.
During the summer the intent was police reform.

This is wrong IMO.

The intent of the BLM protests were police reform.

The intent of the riots of was to loot and destroy, something we see every chance there's a large protest to use as cover.

#137 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 02:46 PM | Reply

"Overall, 66% said that they want the Black Lives Matter riots investigated."

That could mean nearly anything. It could mean investigating the police actions in the riots.

#138 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 02:46 PM | Reply

No wonder you whine so much about being called an idiot or a moron.

Goddam, you are stupid ----. I never whined about being called an idiot or moron. I accurately stated that you are too brain dead to make a valid rebuttal to anything so you resort to calling people names.

Thanks for proving your stupidity and inability to rationally debate once again.

#139 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 02:47 PM | Reply

"said the survey done with the National Police Association."

LOL

#140 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 02:47 PM | Reply

Disrupted?

The quote was disrupting.

Did the duly elected president not assume that role on the assigned date?

Ahhhhh yes, it can't be an insurrection if it failed, right?

Turns out Benedict Arnold has been unjustly maligned all these years!

These people were idiots. Had they done some research, they would have known that, even in the event that there was a question, Nancy Pelosi would have become the acting president until such time that the issue would have been resolved. But there was no constitutional path for DJT to remain president past noon on 20 Jan. Period.

That they were ignorant morons is immaterial to their actions. Why are you so desperate to cover for insurrection?

You might be making the argument that people should be punished for their political views, but in that case, wouldn't the rioters in Portland be subject to the same scrutiny? Their views are as vile as those who stormed the Capitol.

#86 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

Who said anything about punishing for political views? Are you letting your authoritarian streak slip just a little bit?

#141 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 02:50 PM | Reply

"If killing a few insurrectionists would have prevented ------- from declaring marshal law and remaining a dictator, well I would have been fine with that."
None of that happened.
That being said, I don't disagree with you. Smoking a dude or two sends a message about the severity of what's going on.
Had Portland PD smoked a couple of rioters early on, it's a safe bet they wouldn't have been out setting the city on fire for 120 straight days.

#118 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

It didn't happen, because we were lucky.

But there is difference between property damage and and an attempt to overthrow the government, something I would think a veteran would understand but you? Probably not.

#142 | Posted by truthhurts at 2021-07-25 02:51 PM | Reply

#125. Kamala Harris promoted a fund to bail out rioters you ------- idiot. That is more than just cheering, it's providing material support.

#143 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 02:52 PM | Reply

I don't know how progressives aren't thoroughly embarrassed by espousing such blatant double standards.

#88 | POSTED BY SAMS

It's only a double standard to a simpleton looking to create a fake double standard.

Why? Because idiots need things like false equivalencies, straw men and lies to make themselves feel special by "contributing."

#144 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 02:52 PM | Reply

"So, you want like the police to use deadly force to prevent property damage, or are you just spitballing?"
Not really.
That would be your bestie Truthhurts
#105

#128 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

Liar.

Violence to stop a violent overthrow of our government seems reasonable to me and I never took an oath to defend the constitution. How bout you?

#145 | Posted by truthhurts at 2021-07-25 02:53 PM | Reply

You see, I live in a factual world where I seek actual evidence as opposed to a lying POS such as yourself.

#97 | POSTED BY SAMS

LOL well deserved FF!

#146 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 02:54 PM | Reply

#144. Why don't you compare numbers.

Start with the property damage.

#147 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 02:55 PM | Reply

I accurately stated that you are too brain dead to make a valid rebuttal to anything so you resort to calling people names.

Only to people who have been rebutted over and over and over but still present the same rebutted ---- over and over and over.

Much like you, idiot.

#148 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 02:59 PM | Reply

I've already listed a set of reasons why last summer's riots were exponentially worse than 1/6. That is both in severity at the time and the longer term repurcussuons as those riots and how they were treated are a co tributing factor to the huge spike in violent crime.

Your only response is pretend you are smart by issuing insults but without addressing any of the arguments made. You are one immature person.

#149 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 03:00 PM | Reply

#144. Why don't you compare numbers.
Start with the property damage.

#147 | POSTED BY SAMS

Nah, start with overthrowing democracy.

I would argue overthrowing democracy is more important that property damage. You seem to disagree

#150 | Posted by truthhurts at 2021-07-25 03:01 PM | Reply

Start with the property damage.

#147 | POSTED BY SAMS

It's not about property damage you disingenuous pile of dog ----.

I'm fully onboard with catching and charging every single BLM rioter you can.

But I'm not fully onboard with equating property damage to businesses with an ill thought out insurrection to overturn a duly elected POTUS.

Only a severely retarded moron would make that comparison.

#151 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 03:01 PM | Reply

I've already listed a set of reasons why last summer's riots were exponentially worse than 1/6. That is both in severity at the time and the longer term repurcussuons as those riots and how they were treated are a co tributing factor to the huge spike in violent crime.
Your only response is pretend you are smart by issuing insults but without addressing any of the arguments made. You are one immature person.

#149 | POSTED BY SAMS

If you think that overthrowing the presidential election is somehow exponentially better than protests against police brutality, then you are a traitor to this country.

#152 | Posted by truthhurts at 2021-07-25 03:03 PM | Reply

"The intent of the riots of was to loot and destroy, something we see every chance there's a large protest to use as cover."

Yep.

even last summer there were BLM leaders asking Antifa to stay away from their protests due to the bad publicity. In November it became a more official position, after left-wing rioters sacked the DNC headquarters.

Antifa...I hate that term...are trash. Droogs. The best analogy would be ISIS. The claim to stand for something, but really just want to rape and pillage. Bored white kids.

#153 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 03:10 PM | Reply

"Ahhhhh yes, it can't be an insurrection if it failed, right?"

It can't be an insurrection if those involved had no possibility of success to start with.

The rioters in DC were dumb. Like Trump is dumb. They figured that there was a constitutional avenue that would have led to DJT remaining president. There was not. And had they knowingly pursued unconstutional methods, then every elected official and military member would have been required by oath to treat them as enemies. In this case domestic enemies. Generally referred to as DHF. Declared Hostile Forces.

Once that happens you're dead. You may not know it, but you are.

#154 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 03:17 PM | Reply

"That they were ignorant morons is immaterial to their actions. Why are you so desperate to cover for insurrection?"

Why do you think I am?

I think they get everything they deserve.

A better question would be why you're so willing to pretend that what happened in Portland was so much different. So much more forgiveable.

#155 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 03:19 PM | Reply

"Who said anything about punishing for political views? Are you letting your authoritarian streak slip just a little bit?"

If I smash an ATM as a means of lashing out against Capitalism, should it be treated differently than if I smash an ATM because I'm a vandal?

#156 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 03:21 PM | Reply

Protests are constitutionally protected rights, so even if they cause massive loss of life and destruction of property, nothing can or should be done about them. Any regulation is the government coming to take our god given rights.
- 2A lunatics if they weren't hypocrites.

#157 | Posted by bored at 2021-07-25 03:26 PM | Reply

"It can't be an insurrection if those involved had no possibility of success to start with."

But they did succeed, for a few hours.
Nazis succeeded, for a dozen years.
Communists, for even longer.

#158 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 03:28 PM | Reply

If I smash an ATM as a means of lashing out against Capitalism, should it be treated differently than if I smash an ATM because I'm a vandal?
#156 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

You will certainly be treated differently. Motive matters.

#159 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 03:30 PM | Reply

What happened in Portland was on par with the Bundy's standoff, which they got away with (mostly).

#160 | Posted by bored at 2021-07-25 03:32 PM | Reply

"A better question would be why you're so willing to pretend that what happened in Portland was so much different."

They didn't have a major political party and a President behind them.
Their motivations were very different: Their goal was not to disrupt the peaceful transition of power in our country.

#161 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 03:32 PM | Reply

#160 That's a pretty good analogy.

CHAZ in Seattle was another urban version of Malheur Wildlife Refuge takeover.

#162 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 03:34 PM | Reply

But they did succeed, for a few hours.

oooh. So scary. A few hours. No wonder you pants pissing libs are still trembling and racked with fear.

#163 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 03:36 PM | Reply

"They figured that there was a constitutional avenue that would have led to DJT remaining president. There was not."

There was. Kill or otherwise incapacitate #1-4 in the line of succession and Sec. State Pompeo becomes President. Pompeo declares a State of Emergency and invites Trump to retain the office during the transition period thoufh Jan 20 and beyind, and give the Constitutional Ctisis time to play out. Election never gets certified.

#164 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 03:38 PM | Reply

"So scary. A few hours."

So scary. A few fires.

#165 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 03:39 PM | Reply

It can't be an insurrection if those involved had no possibility of success to start with.

Repeating your assertion doesn't make it true or make an argument for it. There is no necessity of success for an insurrection.

And had they knowingly pursued unconstutional methods, then every elected official and military member would have been required by oath to treat them as enemies.

I'm not so convinced as you are that it would have been that simple. I think more members of the military than we'd like to acknowledge would have forgone their oaths to support Trump. Enough to make something happen? Probably not.

But bloodshed and violence, even if unsuccessful, is still a black mark on our nation's soul.

#166 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 03:41 PM | Reply

A better question would be why you're so willing to pretend that what happened in Portland was so much different. So much more forgiveable.

#155 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

They are different.

BLM riots were slashes at extremities of our nation.

The insurrection was an attempt to shove a dagger in its heart.

The last part is your strawman, not mine.

#167 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 03:42 PM | Reply

"What happened in Portland was on par with the Bundy's standoff, which they got away with (mostly)."

Really?

How much property did the Bundy's destroy?

#168 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 03:44 PM | Reply

No wonder you pants pissing libs are still trembling and racked with fear.

#163 | POSTED BY SAMS

This from an idiot who buys into the antifa boogeyman.

#169 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 03:44 PM | Reply

"CHAZ in Seattle was another urban version of Malheur Wildlife Refuge takeover."

Similar...but Malheur was significantly less -----.

#170 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 03:47 PM | Reply

"Their motivations were very different: Their goal was not to disrupt the peaceful transition of power in our country."

We don't want Biden, we want revenge!

www.bing.com

#171 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 03:48 PM | Reply

"BLM riots were slashes at extremities of our nation."

Part and parcel of black people being marginalized in our society. Obvious action and reaction there.

"The insurrection was an attempt to shove a dagger in its heart."

Absolutely. Well said JPW.

Some want the fact that they used a spork instead of a dagger to tone down our alarm at what happened.

It doesn't work that way.

#172 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 03:49 PM | Reply

"We don't want Biden, we want revenge!"

^
That statement demonstrates their goal was not to disrupt the inner workings of our democracy.

#173 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 03:50 PM | Reply

"There was. Kill or otherwise incapacitate #1-4 in the line of succession and Sec. State Pompeo becomes President. Pompeo declares a State of Emergency and invites Trump to retain the office during the transition period thoufh Jan 20 and beyind, and give the Constitutional Ctisis time to play out. Election never gets certified."

Where in the constitution does it say that an acting president can "invite" an unelected individual to be president.

Is that a thing?

Maybe you know more about this than me, but my understanding is that even an elected president can't appoint a replacement. Much less one who came to power via the line of succession.

#174 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-25 03:51 PM | Reply

the plan was to require the states to reissue ballots that were favorable to -------, either through corrupt shenanigans on the state level or alternative ballots, resulting in the election going to the HoR which would have annointed -------.

not saying the 1/6 insurrection was well thought out but insurrection is sure was

#175 | Posted by truthhurts at 2021-07-25 03:55 PM | Reply

not saying the 1/6 insurrection was well thought out but insurrection is sure was

The other mistake is thinking a coup would follow legal channels.

Apparently the top brass was worried about the insurrection act enough to hold meetings about it.

#176 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 04:13 PM | Reply

"Where in the constitution does it say that an acting president can "invite" an unelected individual to be president."

Trump was President on 1/6. So, no invitation needed.

Where does the Constitution say he can't? Our Constitution limits our government. You see that limitation anywhere?

#177 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 04:26 PM | Reply

#151. That's one metric

How about assaults and murders? Or does that not matter either? How about longer term impact? Lemme guess, that's completely unimportant too.

#178 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 04:36 PM | Reply

"not saying the 1/6 insurrection was well thought out but insurrection is sure was"

It reminds me a bit of when after the first Gulf War, Bush I called on Iraqis to overthrow Saddam Hussein, and then the insurgents got hung out to dry.

What an awful, downward trajectory Republicans have spent the past fifty years putting our nation on.

#179 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 04:39 PM | Reply

Bush I called on Iraqis to overthrow Saddam Hussein, and then the insurgents got hung out to dry.

Letting Saddam keep his military helicopters was a serious error.

#180 | Posted by REDIAL at 2021-07-25 04:41 PM | Reply

This from an idiot who buys into the antifa boogeyman.

I've never once mentioned antifa, Jay Pee. Try again with the strawman, -------.

#181 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 04:44 PM | Reply

Finally put a point on the board.

Good on you!

#182 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-25 04:48 PM | Reply

#169 I don't give a rip what you call them. Their actions caused far more mayhem, damage and long term repercussions than those contemptible idiots on 1/6.

#183 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 04:52 PM | Reply

I would argue overthrowing democracy is more important that property damage.
#150 | POSTED BY TRUTHHURTS

Completely agree.

The people supporting the attempted insurrection are only doing so based on the race and political affiliation of those involved.

#184 | Posted by ClownShack at 2021-07-25 04:55 PM | Reply

The long term impact is not yet known.
Anyone who says they know is lying.
Anyone who says they know it's nothing is the political equivalent of a global warming denier.

#185 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 04:58 PM | Reply

#185

During the culmination of the riots and the months that have followed we've seen a huge corresponding spike in crime and violence and it continues to trend upward. Wake me up when 20 Proud Boys try to storm the capitol armed with Red Rider BB guns.

#186 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 05:03 PM | Reply

"During the culmination of the riots and the months that have followed we've seen a huge corresponding spike in crime and violence and it continues to trend upward."

We have?
Does correlation show causation there, or have criminals been saying Antifa and BLM inspired them.

#187 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 05:06 PM | Reply

"Wake me up when 20 Proud Boys try to storm the capitol armed with Red Rider BB guns."

Gov. Widmer on line 2.

#188 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 05:07 PM | Reply

Their actions caused far more mayhem, damage and long term repercussions than those contemptible idiots on 1/6.
#183 | POSTED BY SAMS

You're equating people protesting in the streets for justice.

With rioters showing up at night time after the protests.

With angry losers who were incited by Republican politicians to "stop the steal!"

1) The people protesting didn't cause any property damage and were peaceful and usually subjected to violence by police officers in riot gear.

2) The people burning buildings during the riots were identified as white supremacists. Creating chaos to tarnish the message of the protesters. Obviously it worked. This information will be ignored by partisan posters.

3) Despite losing all their court cases and Republican politicians in PA, GA, and AZ handing Biden the win. Republicans senators spread lies that Democrats stole the election, inciting hundreds of Americans to rush to Washington DC to prevent Biden from becoming President.

Whether these people knew they were being lied to is inconsequential. The fact they failed is irrelevant.

There's no equating any of these three situation.

But. Dishonest, ignorant Republicans think they're all the same.

#189 | Posted by ClownShack at 2021-07-25 05:12 PM | Reply

"Wake me up when 20 Proud Boys try to storm the capitol armed with Red Rider BB guns."

Gov. Widmer on line 2.
#188 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

Republicans, and most Americans, have completely ignored the rioting of the Capitol buildings in Michigan, Tennessee and Kentucky.

#190 | Posted by ClownShack at 2021-07-25 05:16 PM | Reply

" It can't be an insurrection if those involved had no possibility of success to start with."

Moronic.

A similar result for a bank robbery would be attempted bank robbery. But there is no "attempted" when it comes to insurrections: the attempt itself is the insurrection. In this case, a failed insurrection, but an insurrection all the same.

The author of the quote either doesn't know the definition, or knows and thinks you don't.

#191 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-25 05:42 PM | Reply

You're equating people protesting in the streets for justice.

With rioters showing up at night time after the protests"

No, I've done nothing of the sort. Your lost started with a straw man so I skipped over the rest of it.

#192 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 05:48 PM | Reply

#187. It's not about being inspired. It's about being shown what they can get away with and how local officials enable crime and shackle police from trying to prevent it.

#193 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 05:51 PM | Reply

"It can't be an insurrection if those involved had no possibility of success to start with."

^
It can't be trying to have sex with a child if it was police posing as an underage girl.

#194 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 05:53 PM | Reply

" Is it smoke a few Antifa -------? If they went out knowing that they may die for throwing a molotov cocktail, maybe they would choose not to throw molotov cocktails"

I've posted this before.

My city had multiple nights of protests, and a close friend went to each. He said every night someone not in their group would show up, throw something, then run away. He also noticed one common aspect: each was wearing a Hawaiian shirt.

Frankly, anarchists don't care who gets the blame. Boogaloo Bois, however, clearly want the blame on BLM.

#195 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-25 06:07 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Your lost started with a straw man so I skipped over the rest of it.
#192 | POSTED BY SAMS

Goatman? Welcome back.

Anyway.

No one has defended rioting. There's been discussions about who has carried out the most destructive aspects of the rioting - Building burning. Which was shown to be white supremacists.

Not sure what any of this has to do with 1/6 as it wasn't a riot but an attempted insurrection.

#196 | Posted by ClownShack at 2021-07-25 06:09 PM | Reply

#195 anecdotal. Throwing a bottle is not the same as mass violence.

#197 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 06:19 PM | Reply

"Throwing a bottle is not the same as mass violence."

Throwing a bottle is a common reason the police use to deploy force against protesters.

#198 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 09:54 PM | Reply

Ashli Babbitt was a righteous kill. The example of her death in that precise moment probably saved the lives of many innocents and not a few of your friends.
#60 | POSTED BY ZED

"Ashli Babbitt died so others wouldn't have to."

Is probably the most beautiful and poetic thing I've read about this woman's death.

Bravo, Zed.

#199 | Posted by ClownShack at 2021-07-25 10:03 PM | Reply

Righteous!
(guitar riff)

#200 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 10:07 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

" anecdotal. Throwing a bottle is not the same as mass violence."

Observing the same method of bottle throwing night after night ceases to be anecdotal.

And Snoofy's point is well-taken: a thrown bottle is often the spark, and that's the thrower's goal. That, and the generally peaceful crowd to get blamed.

#201 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-25 10:19 PM | Reply

And Snoofy's point is well-taken: a thrown bottle is often the spark, and that's the thrower's goal. That, and the generally peaceful crowd to get blamed.

That undoubtedly does happen.

By the same token those summer riots were real and they were horrific.

#202 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 10:45 PM | Reply

"By the same token those summer riots were real and they were horrific."

And they weren't instigated by BLM protesters.

#203 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 11:01 PM | Reply

And the vast majority of the protests, well over 90%, were all peaceful.
We've had this discussion repeatedly, but you keep trying to obfuscate, equivocate, blur, and misinform.

#204 | Posted by YAV at 2021-07-25 11:02 PM | Reply

Losers like to equivocate when they know they're defending people who have done horrific things.

#205 | Posted by Tor at 2021-07-25 11:09 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#204 I'm not saying otherwise.

Are you suggesting those riots didn't happen?

The arson, looting, assaults and murders didn't take place?

Are you defending that ----?

#206 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 11:31 PM | Reply

If you are not defending those riots then what the ---- is your point?

#207 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 11:32 PM | Reply

...no sammie if you can't defend the actions of the insurrectionists all on their own it's you who are in the wrong.

#208 | Posted by Tor at 2021-07-25 11:46 PM | Reply

I unequivocally denounce the 1/6 rioters and want them to be charged in accordance with the law.

Is that clear enough for you?

#209 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 11:49 PM | Reply

"I unequivocally denounce the 1/6 rioters and want them to be charged in accordance with the law.

Is that clear enough for you?"

With baller moves like that you may still get married and have kids.

And on that note.....

#210 | Posted by Tor at 2021-07-25 11:53 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"I unequivocally denounce the 1/6 rioters and want them to be charged in accordance with the law."

Ashli Babbitt on Line 2 (and post 62 and 29).

#211 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-25 11:55 PM | Reply

#211

I denounce what Ashli Babbitt did. I question whether or not her actions warranted her being fatally shot.

Is that too nuanced for you?

#212 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 11:58 PM | Reply

" And the vast majority of the protests, well over 90%, were all peaceful. We've had this discussion repeatedly"

That's probably one reason why the cowards keep changing handles: they never have to stand behind anything they post, and can start any discussion anew, even after they've been handed their ass on the topic multiple times.

#213 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-25 11:59 PM | Reply

#213

It's not cowardice. Numerous have been permanently banned, myself included. I'm about to bow out again for a really long time. Do you want to have an actual discusssion, albeit brief or do you want to just flame away?

#214 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 12:10 AM | Reply

This is just a cameo for me.

#215 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 12:11 AM | Reply

"Is that too nuanced for you?"

It's too much -------- for me.
Your questions reek of not having enough information.

"I question whether or not her actions warranted her being fatally shot."

Do you likewise question whether her actions justify her being fatally shot, or do you only question if they warrant her being fatally shot?

This is precisely the -------- I'm referring to.

#216 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-26 12:12 AM | Reply

#218

I read that 4 times and couldn't make sense of your question. Please rephrase what' you are asking.

#217 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 12:18 AM | Reply

Do you think the shooter went beyond the bounds of acceptable use of deadly force?

Or are you taking a pass, because you can't decide if the shooter went beyond the bounds of acceptable use of deadly force?

You've sworn the Oath of Office I assume. You may have even been authorized to use deadly force to carry out that oath. Do you think someone who has both sworn the Oath, and is authorized to use deadly force to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies foreign and domestic, can shoot? Or are you going to navel gaze about it some more?

#218 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-26 12:20 AM | Reply

" It's not cowardice. Numerous have been permanently banned, myself included. I'm about to bow out again for a really long time. Do you want to have an actual discusssion, albeit brief or do you want to just flame away?"

If that was actually the truth, you wouldn't mind identifying yourself.

It absolutely IS cowardice: you're afraid to put your own identity to your posts.

#219 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 12:20 AM | Reply

Do you think the Constitution of the United States was under attack, by insurgents seeking to disrupt the Constitutionally mandated transfer of power?

Yes or no.

#220 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-26 12:22 AM | Reply

If that was actually the truth, you wouldn't mind identifying yourself.

It absolutely IS cowardice: you're afraid to put your own identity to your posts.

#219 | POSTED BY DANFORTH

Are you afraid to engage me in debate without knowing my identity?

I am using a sock puppet account. It won't last long.

Your arguments shouldn't be dependent upon knowing who I am.

Either step up or walk away. I am going to bed pretty soon and won't be back.

#221 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 12:26 AM | Reply

Do you think the Constitution of the United States was under attack, by insurgents seeking to disrupt the Constitutionally mandated transfer of power?

Yes or no.

#220 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

Are you still beating your girlfriend?

Yes or no.

Scram, punk

Hopefully Danforth can step up and have an actual conversation before I move away for a long time.

#222 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 12:28 AM | Reply

-------- out is a fitting way for you to leave.

It's how you left the first time too.

Bye, Felicia.

#223 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-26 12:29 AM | Reply

" Are you afraid to engage me in debate without knowing my identity?"

Obviously not, all my posts as proof. But if what you say is true, you can't deny you're a coward.

You're about to leave for a long time ... but you can't be honest enough to identify yourself?!?

That's the textbook definition of a coward: nothing to lose, but still won't step up to the plate.

#224 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 12:34 AM | Reply

" Either step up or walk away."

I was thinking the exact same thing.

Stay a coward, walk away. There'll be another moron to replace you in a day or two, and you'll have become just another fart in the wind.

#225 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 12:36 AM | Reply

" Are you afraid to engage me in debate without knowing my identity?"
---
Obviously not, all my posts as proof.

All you've done is slaughter the source. Seriously. That is all you've done.

I won't give you the pleasure of knowing who I am (and yes, you do know who I am).

Extract my --- from your wife's --- and you can figure out exactly who I am.

#226 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 12:44 AM | Reply

"I won't give you the pleasure of knowing who I am"

Don't flatter yourself; I've known who you are since the start.

That moron's a coward, too.

#227 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 12:47 AM | Reply

" All you've done is slaughter the source."

Don't look now, but your source slaughtered herself. Any time an author removes her byline from a blockbuster scoop, you can (and should) be assured it didn't pass the smell test. Pretending you have proof they didn't is laughable.

Every post of yours simply reminds me a certain number of people will always be among the dumbest 10% in the country. My guess is the only test you've ever aced was the one at Dunning-Kruger.

#228 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 12:52 AM | Reply

Later, all

Enjoy your echo chamber.

I made a cameo to try and offer y'all a bit of a challenge from the usual----------- back slapping. Needless to say, everyone doubled down.

Enjoy your ideological bubble and PLEASE keep advocating for grown men to be able to compete in women's sports like Heather Swanson and be able to flash that thin uncircumcised penis in front of young girls at a spa in a supposed women-only safe space.

While you are at it, continue to advocate for state run media where Dems partner with Tech Giants to control messaging (classic definition of fascism is the merger of state and corporate power) because "misinformation".

And by all means keep poking mama bear with your aggressive attempts to incorporate CRT principles into K-12 so you can try and indoctrinate kids at a young age to hate themselves and others based solely upon the color of their skin.

Best wishes even though some of you likely wish horrible things upon me and those whom I care about.

Signing off...

#229 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 12:58 AM | Reply

" I made a cameo to try and offer y'all a bit of a challenge"

And failed miserably.

Which you'll believe was a win.

#230 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 01:07 AM | Reply

" Signing off..."

No, slinking off, coward.

You didn't "sign" anything.

#231 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 01:09 AM | Reply

Best wishes even though some of you likely wish horrible things upon me and those whom I care about.

You gotta love it when the racist homophobe plays victim.

#232 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2021-07-26 01:54 AM | Reply

"the plan was to require the states to reissue ballots that were favorable to -------, either through corrupt shenanigans on the state level or alternative ballots, resulting in the election going to the HoR which would have annointed -------."

And when it came time to certify the votes yet again Dem members would have protested the results. At the end of the day, there was no constitutional path that allowed Trump to be president. It was always going to be Biden...possibly Pelosi.

But not Trump.

#233 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-26 02:04 AM | Reply

"The other mistake is thinking a coup would follow legal channels. Apparently the top brass was worried about the insurrection act enough to hold meetings about it."

A coup is a very different matter.

Whatever the rioters were doing on 1/6, it wasn't a direct attack on the constitution. A coup is.

Had there been a coup, every service member and federal government official would have been obligated by oath to put it down. Similarly, following any orders issued by an unelected president would be unlawful, and it would have been unlawful to follow them.

#234 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-26 02:09 AM | Reply

Enjoy your echo chamber.

It's called "Reality" Your party has a serious problem with it.

Examples?

Biden won, Trump lost, there was no significant election fraud.
Mail-in ballots are safe.
Vaccines are good.
Reaganomics is crap.
CRT is not taught in K-12.
Abstinence only teaching doesn't work.

#235 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2021-07-26 02:12 AM | Reply

here was no constitutional path that allowed Trump to be president. It was always going to be Biden...possibly Pelosi.
But not Trump.

#233 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER AT 2021-07-26 02:04 AM | REPLY | FLAG

So if I rob your house looking for emeralds and you have none I get a pass?

#236 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2021-07-26 02:13 AM | Reply

"A similar result for a bank robbery would be attempted bank robbery. But there is no "attempted" when it comes to insurrections: the attempt itself is the insurrection. In this case, a failed insurrection, but an insurrection all the same."

So when does an insurrectionist become an insurrectionist?

Is it based on a specific act, or a belief?

And if I engage in a specific act because of a belief, does that somehow make the act more or less onerous?

#237 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-26 02:16 AM | Reply

"So if I rob your house looking for emeralds and you have none I get a pass?"

Is someone getting a pass?

If you engaged in illegal activity, you get charged and punished based on how that crime is dealt with.

Most 1/6ers are being charged with interfering with LE and/or obstructing a congressional hearing. Which seems to be the right charge for the crime.

#238 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-26 02:20 AM | Reply

Insurrection:
a violent uprising against an authority or government.

1/6 Wasn't a peaceful protest or a riot, it was an insurrection.

#239 | Posted by bored at 2021-07-26 02:23 AM | Reply

You gotta love it when the racist homophobe plays victim.

Not as much as you like a big throbbing black ---- up your ass, Alexandria.

#240 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 02:34 AM | Reply

No, slinking off, coward.

You want my ---- that badly, do you Dickforth?

#241 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 02:36 AM | Reply

#241

Did you ever expect actual respect?!? So much for "Best wishes ..." just more bullschitt.

Slink off, coward. Good riddance to bad trash. You'll be forgotten in two hours.

#242 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 02:45 AM | Reply

Don't flatter yourself; I've known who you are since the start.

Then tell me who i zm. Oh, what? You won't, Dickforth?

Coward.

Pleased to meet you
Hope you guess my name
But what's puzzling you
Is the nature of my game

#243 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 02:46 AM | Reply

So much for "Best wishes .

God damn, you are a stupid ----, Dickforth. We already explained this is a community sock puppet. One of us signed off. The rest didn't.

Read that as many times as necessary to get it into your festering ---- filled head.

#244 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 02:48 AM | Reply

"Hope you guess my name"

You've got more tells than you know.

I sure hope you play poker. No doubt with mirrored glasses, to be cool.

#245 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 02:49 AM | Reply

You'll be forgotten in two hours.

No, I'll continue living in your head rent free for a long, long time, Dickforth.

#246 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 02:50 AM | Reply

You've got more tells than you know.

Then who am I, coward?

#247 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 02:51 AM | Reply

" this is a community sock puppet. "

It shows. The IQ pool is stagnant. Now are you the closet gay Sams, the can't tell the truth Sams, or the dumbass who doesn't realize the significance of a reporter refusing a byline Sams?

#248 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 02:54 AM | Reply

That's right, Dickforth. Slink off, coward.

Your buttons are so easy to push. The easiest on this rat infested liberal love fest.

#249 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 02:55 AM | Reply

Who am I, Dickforth?

Coward.

All talk no substance.

Suck my furry balls, --- breath.

#250 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 02:56 AM | Reply

"Then who am I, coward?"

Yes.

Coward.

BTW, one of your tells is in one of your last ten posts.

#251 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 02:57 AM | Reply

BTW, one of your tells is in one of your last ten posts.

Then who am I, coward?

You have no ------- idea, Dickforth.

#252 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 02:58 AM | Reply

" You have no ------- idea,"

Of course I do. Besides your wording tells, you lack of basic logic is a dead giveaway.

Nite, all!

#253 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 03:00 AM | Reply

Of course I do.

Then who am I, coward? You have no ------- idea, Dickforth,

Nite, all!

That's right. Slink away, coward.

I win!

#254 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 03:02 AM | Reply

Who's next in line to get their --- covered teeth kicked in by me? Dickforth was too easy, but I love pulling wings off of flies like her.

#255 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 03:08 AM | Reply

" That's right. Slink away, coward."

And there's another tell: you rebuttal level can only match the original posters words. I called you a coward, and backed my statement with a handful of proofs, and all you can think to do is call me a coward. HUGE tell.

#256 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 03:13 AM | Reply

Dickforth in a nutshell:

Goalposts
Dunning-Kruger.
Riiiiiiiiight
Coward
The stupid, it burns

Take those overused words out her vocabulary and she's as empty as my beer cans.

#257 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 03:14 AM | Reply

^you = your

#258 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 03:14 AM | Reply

HUGE tell.

Tne who am I? You won't say because you don't know, coward.

#259 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 03:15 AM | Reply

" Dickforth"

Another tell.

Wouldn't you be more comfortable blogging from the crapper?

#260 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 03:17 AM | Reply

I should say, "Who are we?"

But that would short circuit your three firing neurons.

#261 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 03:17 AM | Reply

Another tell.

Then who am I, coward? You seem to have no problem cementing your position as a coward here.

BINGO! I am indeed posting from the crapper. Check out the big brain on Dickforth!

#262 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 03:19 AM | Reply

" I should say, "Who are we?""

Well, I know at least one: closeted gay Sams. When will you be describing your latest bowel movement?

#263 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 03:20 AM | Reply

" I am indeed posting from the crapper."

It's where you do your best work. And most substantive.

#264 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 03:21 AM | Reply

Well, I know at least one:

Riiiiiiiight

#265 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 03:22 AM | Reply

It's where you do your best work. And most substantive.

You got that right! You're on a roll, Dickforth!

#266 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 03:23 AM | Reply

When will you be describing your latest bowel movement?

Find a mirror
Gaze into it
You have the perfect description of my latest bowel movement, Dickforth.

#267 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 03:24 AM | Reply

sams is the only one that doesn't know he's gay.

#268 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2021-07-26 03:26 AM | Reply

sams is the only one that doesn't know he's gay.

What the ---- are you talking about Alexandria? I'm queerer than a three dollar bill and have known it for decades.

Try again, dick breath.

#269 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 03:28 AM | Reply

Dickforth and Alexandria sure have this thing for closeted gays. Projection?

#270 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 03:29 AM | Reply

rex
jeff j
goatman

have a good night, lads.

#271 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2021-07-26 03:29 AM | Reply

Yesterday Dickforth the progressive suggested I needed therapy for my queerness. How liberal!

#272 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 03:30 AM | Reply

rex
jeff j
goatman

Alexandria wins the trifecta!

#273 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 03:32 AM | Reply

" ... the perfect description of my latest bowel movement,"

You're better at plop-by-plop descriptions than any other poster in DR history.

#274 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 03:38 AM | Reply

Surprisingly (or maybe not) Alexandria has bigger balls than Dickforth the coward. All Dickforth can say is variations of, "I know who you are" but won't say. That's because he's a closeted gay coward.

#275 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 03:39 AM | Reply

You're better at plop-by-plop descriptions than any other poster in DR history.

Thank you, Dickforth. I try.

#276 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 03:40 AM | Reply

GF was a drug addict with a violent criminal history. Yet now he's a martyr. A hero.

Thank the cop that murdered him in cold blood.

#277 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2021-07-26 03:47 AM | Reply

#277

I suppose.

It explains why many regard Ashli Babbitt as a martyr.

#278 | Posted by madbomber at 2021-07-26 03:50 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

'GF' was already subdued and complying and the cop sat on his neck for 9 minutes.

Ashli was mid crime while she got shot.

Terrible comparison.

#279 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2021-07-26 03:54 AM | Reply

"That's because he's a closeted gay coward."

See? Another tell, and exactly what I was describing earlier: no imagination or intelligence whatsoever.

#280 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 03:58 AM | Reply

Another tell,

Then who am I? You have no ------- idea, you ---- faced coward.

#281 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 04:01 AM | Reply

" You have no ------- idea"

Nonsense. I've known from the start.

You were on the DR, years ago; if you've come back, it's obviously been under a different handle. We used to debate, and you got your ass handed to you so often you stopped engaging me for years before you were banned.

Your posting "style", such as it isn't, hasn't changed a bit: stupid posts followed with gay slurs when you're called out. That was one of the easy tells.

It's not difficult; there are only about ten permabans who'd even be interested in slinking back here. Knock out the folks with decent logic and intellectual honesty, and the choices remaining are pretty obvious.

#282 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 04:15 AM | Reply

I've known from the start.

You are wrong. I you know who I am, you would say. But you can't, so you won't.

---- sucking coward.

#283 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 04:19 AM | Reply

" You are wrong. "

No I'm not. You've checked every single box on that moron's list. Plus, you're such an inveterate liar, we both know you'd lie if I posted it.

Sorry, not going to give you the chance.

Now this is where you show your limited brain power by some lame gay slur in the place of an actual honest response.

#284 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 04:24 AM | Reply

You have no ------- clue who I am, you ---- sucking coward.

#285 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 04:25 AM | Reply

As I said in post 246. You have 20 minutes to forget me, Dickforth.

#286 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 04:27 AM | Reply

Who?

#287 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 04:28 AM | Reply

Exactly!

#288 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 04:32 AM | Reply

You'll never know.

#289 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 04:33 AM | Reply

"Not as much as you like a big throbbing black ---- up your ass, Alexandria."

For some reason this poster reminds me of "Bruce".

#290 | Posted by sentinel at 2021-07-26 05:22 AM | Reply

After the tip, officials reviewed flight records, security footage and social media posts. A federal agent said images show Taake "using what appears to be a metal whip and pepper spray to attack law enforcement officers."

It was a loving event. They were hugging and kissing.

- Fat-------------.

#291 | Posted by Nixon at 2021-07-26 07:37 AM | Reply

You'll never know.

I know I'll never care.

#292 | Posted by YAV at 2021-07-26 07:48 AM | Reply

I know I'll never care.

Sure thing, ---- head. That's why you cut and pasted one of my previous posts on the nooner. What an ignorant and festering pile of ---- you are.

#293 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 08:14 AM | Reply

Notice when Ashli Babbitt was shot there was no return fire? Pretty difficult to carry out an insurrection against the most powerful government in the world without any firearms. The guy who shot up a congressional softball game committed a bigger assault on our democracy than those moron rioters on 1/6.

#29 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-25 11:27 AM | Reply | Flag

How many people died when the guy shot up the congressional baseball practice?

The shooting at the Congressional baseball practice was not intended to stop our democratic process from doing it's job. Nowhere does our democracy depend on baseball. The crowd on 1/6 marched into the building to a) stop the count b) hang Mike Pence and c) catch, "try" and kill Nancy Pelosi. The goal was to attack our democratic process.

Your defense that it was not an insurrection solely because the morons ------- out and did not return fire? So the fact they were cowards absolves them of their crime? So a guy pistol whips a bank security gaurd, passes a note to a teller "Hand over all the money" and when fleeing sees the cops, drops his gun and surrenders means he didn't rob a bank.

Are you part of the Kraken Krewe legal team that is about to lose their law licenses?

#294 | Posted by Nixon at 2021-07-26 08:15 AM | Reply

Sure thing, ---- head. That's why you cut and pasted one of my previous posts on the nooner. What an ignorant and festering pile of ---- you are.

I did that for Boaz, not for you. I appreciated you making it so clear though. That was an unexpected gift and fell perfectly into his defense of his site yesterday. If you read your post there, it was in context with Boaz' statement.

Why the vitriol? Poor poster. This place can't be good for your health.

#295 | Posted by YAV at 2021-07-26 08:34 AM | Reply

And if I engage in a specific act because of a belief, does that somehow make the act more or less onerous?
#237 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

This ---- again?
Laura Bush ran over someone, right?
Do you think it mattered if it was intentional or an accident?

#296 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-26 08:57 AM | Reply

"You'll never know."

Of course I will, my bitch. I knew from the start.

#297 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 09:49 AM | Reply

Where'd you run off to, Mrs. Danforth?

#298 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 11:59 AM | Reply

You are wrong. I you know who I am, you would say. But you can't, so you won't.

---- sucking coward.

#283 | Posted by sams

Cowards are the ones who have to change their usernames to escape their past idiocy.

#299 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2021-07-26 12:30 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"(If) you know who I am, you would say. But you can't, so you won't."

Then I did.

And my bitch ran away.

#300 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 12:42 PM | Reply

Losers like to equivocate when they know they're defending people who have done horrific things.

#205 | POSTED BY TOR

This.

#301 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 03:07 PM | Reply

It's not cowardice. Numerous have been permanently banned, myself included. I'm about to bow out again for a really long time. Do you want to have an actual discusssion, albeit brief or do you want to just flame away?

#214 | POSTED BY SAMS

So why do you keep coming back?

This is just a cameo for me.

#215 | POSTED BY SAMS

It's not a cameo if you're using a fake name and refusing to reveal who you are.

Is this Jeff? RoC?

#302 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 03:11 PM | Reply

#229 | POSTED BY SAMS

Wow. I haven't seen a post drip so much faux victim -------- in forever.

#303 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 03:19 PM | Reply

#302

It was a multiple.

Several folks noticed the shift change, from gay slur bitch to smell-test challenged poster, then back to gay slur bitch.

#304 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 03:21 PM | Reply

I suppose.
It explains why many regard Ashli Babbitt as a martyr.

#278 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

Not remotely close to a valid comparison.

#305 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 03:30 PM | Reply

I suppose.
It explains why many regard Ashli Babbitt as a martyr.

#278 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

Clearly.

The cameo was obvious JeffJ. Although possibly RoC.

The rest of the idiocy is Rex. I can't believe they let that moron onto the other server. He was a creepy ass SOB.

In any case it's pretty pathetic that they keep slinking back.

#306 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 03:33 PM | Reply

I suppose.
It explains why many regard Ashli Babbitt as a martyr.

#278 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

Clearly.

The cameo was obvious JeffJ. Although possibly RoC.

The rest of the idiocy is Rex. I can't believe they let that moron onto the other server. He was a creepy ass SOB.

In any case it's pretty pathetic that they keep slinking back.

#307 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 03:33 PM | Reply

Oops two screw ups.

Bad C&P and double post. This new comp sucks.

#308 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 03:34 PM | Reply

#39 Snoofy-

The softball game shooter killed surprisingly few people given his choice of firearm. I submit the shooter wasn't trying to kill anybody. He just wanted to stir the SXXT-pot a bit!

John47

#309 | Posted by john47 at 2021-07-26 03:39 PM | Reply

John47, I would certainly agree that he was trying to "send a message."

#310 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-26 03:45 PM | Reply

So why do you keep coming back?

Because your buttons are so easy to push, J. Pee. It's fun watching you dance to my tune spunk face.

#311 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 04:36 PM | Reply

It's fun watching you dance to my tune spunk face.

#311 | POSTED BY SAMS

Have you ever considered that you might be mentally ill?

#312 | Posted by Zed at 2021-07-26 04:40 PM | Reply

Have you ever considered that you might be mentally ill?

Of course I have, -------.

#313 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 04:44 PM | Reply

Is this Jeff? RoC

And about a dozen others.

#314 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 04:49 PM | Reply

I'd be embarrassed to share my account with you juvenile --------.

#315 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2021-07-26 04:51 PM | Reply

Of course I have, -------.

#313 | POSTED BY SAMS

Well, and what did you decide?

#316 | Posted by Zed at 2021-07-26 04:52 PM | Reply

And about a dozen others.

#314 | Posted by sams

If you believe in the things you say, why do you have to keep hiding behind different masks?

I've been on this site for over a decade and haven't had to change my name once.

#317 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2021-07-26 05:21 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"If you believe in the things you say, why do you have to keep hiding behind different masks?"

DARTH VADER lies mortally wounded. LUKE SKYWALKER kneels at his side.

DARTH VADER: Luke, help me take this mask off.
LUKE SKYWALKER: But you'll die.
DARTH VADER: I have rights!

#318 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-26 05:31 PM | Reply

I've been on this site for over a decade and haven't had to change my name once.

You would if you wanted to make liberals like you dance and Roger deleted your account, dumb ----.

#319 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 05:40 PM | Reply

You're not exactly the sharpest tack at this lib fest, are you -----------?

#320 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 05:41 PM | Reply

Well, and what did you decide?

I decided that people who believe in and grovel to invisible sky fairies shouldn't be lecturing people about mental illness, craZed.

#321 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 05:45 PM | Reply

You would if you wanted to troll.
#319 | POSTED BY SAMS

FTFY.

You're a victim of your own stupidity and vulgarity.

At least you can go back to the Konservative Kry Klub and sit around complaining about Rogers and the DR.

#322 | Posted by ClownShack at 2021-07-26 05:45 PM | Reply

You would if you wanted to make liberals like you dance and Roger deleted your account, dumb ----.

#319 | Posted by sams

Saying you make liberals dance shows you think trolling is some sort of skill. How bad is your lack of skills that this is one you consider an accomplishment?

How bad does the rest of your life suck that your source of dopamine is saying things on an obscure website in an attempt to upset better people than you? Do you feel like you're getting revenge for your life turning out so much worse than theirs?

Your account wouldnt get deleted if you could engage in honest debate. It's no one's fault but yours that you have to keep creating new usernames.

#323 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2021-07-26 05:46 PM | Reply

Roger deleted your account, dumb ----.
#319 | POSTED BY SAMS

No fault of your own, right?

Always someone else's, right?

You're clearly aware of why you were banned.

But. Sure. Blame Rogers.

#324 | Posted by ClownShack at 2021-07-26 05:49 PM | Reply

No fault of your own, right?

If you count us posting like leftwingers and still getting booted, then yeah, I guess it was our fault.

#325 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 05:54 PM | Reply

#325 | POSTED BY SAMS

How do we know each other?

#327 | Posted by Zed at 2021-07-26 05:55 PM | Reply

Big secret?

#328 | Posted by Zed at 2021-07-26 05:59 PM | Reply

I would love to see a troll-off between Snoofy and craZed.

#329 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 06:02 PM | Reply

If you count us posting like leftwingers and still getting booted, then yeah, I guess it was our fault.
#325 | POSTED BY SAMS AT 2021-07-26 05:54 PM | REPLY

Wah. If this website is so unfair why do you keep coming back?

My guess is mental illness.

#330 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2021-07-26 06:05 PM | Reply

Zed- SAMS is a communal sock puppet account made of ring wingers who got themselves banned.

Think of it as a Voltron, only made up of whiny bitches instead of robot lions.

#331 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2021-07-26 06:07 PM | Reply

Wah. If this website is so unfair why do you keep coming back?

For the tenth time. Pay attention. To ---- with stupid libs like you.

#332 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 06:10 PM | Reply

Grow up.

#333 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2021-07-26 06:12 PM | Reply

Send me some barbeque recipes, jeff.

#335 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2021-07-26 06:19 PM | Reply

If you count us posting like leftwingers and still getting booted, then yeah, I guess it was our fault.

#325 | Posted by sams

Who the hell is "we"? You and the rest of the proud boys losers? Or are all your other usernames referred to in the third person?

If you posted as a leftwinger and got booted, that proves that you weren't banned for partisan reasons you moron.

#336 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2021-07-26 06:28 PM | Reply

I guess it was our fault.
#325 | POSTED BY SAMS

At least you admit it was your fault.

Go suck some ----, Persian Poof.
#326 | POSTED BY SAMS

How original ...

#337 | Posted by ClownShack at 2021-07-26 06:36 PM | Reply

Send me some barbeque recipes, jeff.
#335 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE

I'm surprised Jeff doesn't take the time to make his own username rather than join these trolls.

#338 | Posted by ClownShack at 2021-07-26 06:38 PM | Reply

#338 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK -- Honestly I am not. He was only faking to be moderately on the fence and showed his true colors before he left.

#339 | Posted by justagirl_idaho at 2021-07-26 06:49 PM | Reply

Because your buttons are so easy to push, J. Pee. It's fun watching you dance to my tune spunk face.

#311 | POSTED BY SAMS

Right. Because of everyone here the one who keeps coming back to a place he's not wanted just to bitch about had bad it is while making constant references to dicks and --- is the one who's pushing the buttons.

LOL

#340 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 06:58 PM | Reply

At least you admit it was your fault.

Of course I do. Unlike you ----------- libs, we're honest.

#341 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 06:58 PM | Reply

Can you be as honest, Persian Poof and admit there were different rules here for libs and conservatives?

I'll bet not.

#342 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 07:00 PM | Reply

To ---- with stupid libs like you.

#332 | POSTED BY SAMS

Except all you've done is prove what a bunch of whiny ----- you tools are.

The sausage party must be a happening place for you guys to have to keep coming here.

#343 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 07:02 PM | Reply

Because of everyone here the one who keeps coming back to a place he's not wanted

No, not everyone. But some of us are getting a huge kick pushing buttons. You, Jay Pee and Dickforth are our favorites. More triggering for the buck so to speak

#344 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 07:03 PM | Reply

Unlike you ----------- libs, we're honest.

#341 | POSTED BY SAMS

So honest you keep making sock puppets to come back to a site you oeft after throwing a bitch fit over a faux victim complex?

#345 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 07:03 PM | Reply

Send me some barbeque recipes, jeff.

#335 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE

Whatever you do don't take goatmam's advice on sourdough bread.

It's sucked and everyone I talked to said it was totally wrong.

#346 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 07:05 PM | Reply

So honest you keep making sock puppets to come back to a site you oeft after throwing a bitch fit over a faux victim complex?

Goddam you are a stupid ----. Read previous messages as long as it take for your micro brain figures it out. Or get Zippy the Pinhead to explain.

#347 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 07:05 PM | Reply

#339 JUSTAGIRL

It's a shame.

For the most part, I enjoyed conversation with Jeff.

He came off as a normal person. Much like Eberly does.

I know we disagreed on politics. But, there seemed to be more to him.

Probably just me projecting, seeing what I wanted to see.

#348 | Posted by ClownShack at 2021-07-26 07:06 PM | Reply

No, not everyone. But some of us are getting a huge kick pushing buttons.

I'm sure you are.

I would suggest, though, that the posting history of this account does not represent the party doing the triggering.

#349 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 07:07 PM | Reply

Question for you, faux doc: Do you have any kind of life outside this place? You are here every day of the week hours on end. I don't see how you can even have to go to McDonalds. But there is Door Dash, I guess.

#350 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 07:07 PM | Reply

Can you be as honest, Persian Poof and admit there were different rules here for libs and conservatives?

I'll bet not.

#342 | Posted by sams

YOu just said you got banned even when posing as a liberal. Moron.

#351 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2021-07-26 07:07 PM | Reply

#347

I read the messages.

Discord is falling apart and you're bitterly lashing out at a site you scuttled your relationship with.

Please tell me you --------- are at least drunk while on this tirade.

#352 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 07:08 PM | Reply

More triggering for the buck so to speak

#344 | Posted by sams

I do appreciate the honesty. There's always been that stereotype that trump supporters are just losers and failures who resent all the smarter more hardworking people whose lives turned out better, and trolling the people they're jealous of is the only way they can feel less like a failure, but I've never heard anyone admit it as openly as you do.

#353 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2021-07-26 07:09 PM | Reply

So honest you keep making sock puppets to come back to a site you oeft after throwing a bitch fit over a faux victim complex?

#345 | POSTED BY JPW

So your real name is JPW? I didn't know that "Dr." Honesty.

#354 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 07:13 PM | Reply

Discord is falliing apart

Citation needed, dick breath

#355 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 07:14 PM | Reply

admit there were different rules here for libs and conservatives?

If you consider not accepting links from hardcore, conservative website as "different rules," then sure.

A few weeks ago Boaz posted an article about a transgender person at Wi Spa exposing themself to women and children. The article was removed. I was wondering why. A few days later it was reported the entire story was bogus.

Perhaps if conservatives didn't believe the latest Republican bullshht, fake news, conspiracy theory ... RCade wouldn't need to monitor you all so closely.

#356 | Posted by ClownShack at 2021-07-26 07:14 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Send me some barbeque recipes, jeff.

You wouldn't like them. None have human ----- as an ingredient.

#357 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 07:17 PM | Reply

Whatever you do don't take goatmam's advice on sourdough bread.

It's sucked and everyone I talked to said it was totally wrong.

I would tell him, but he would be so devastated by what the faux doc said, he'd probably commit suicide.

Isn't it about time you and your giant ego give it a rest, ---- face?? Even some lefties here acknowledge the gravitational pull of your ego.

#358 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 07:19 PM | Reply

None have human ----- as an ingredient.
#357 | POSTED BY SAMS

I'm sure his wife would love some homemade Jeff sauce.

For breakfast and dinner.

Tell him not to deny her.

#359 | Posted by ClownShack at 2021-07-26 07:20 PM | Reply

I never saw JEFFJ exhibit mean spirited tendencies. Highly doubtful it's him. I disagreed with his politics, but he never went out of his way to be an ass****, in my experience.

Whoever is posting as "SAMS" is an ass****. Pitifully juvenile motivation in bothering to spend precious hours of life to come here and post juvenile insults. His life must really suck. REX, MAO, Chairborne ... those, IMO, would be more the kind to stoop to these levels of low because they weren't nice people under their recognized handles.

#360 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2021-07-26 07:21 PM | Reply

Tell him not to deny her.

I will. Now get back to your googling of the perfect riesiger schwarzer schwanz , Persian poof

#361 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 07:22 PM | Reply

I will.

I doubt it.

#362 | Posted by ClownShack at 2021-07-26 07:26 PM | Reply

"What does you son do?"

"Oh he's a doctor who's been fighting covid on the frontlines and saving lives. He's highly successful and at the top of his field."

"Wow that's impressive. You must be very proud."

"I am. What about your son?"

"He's also very successful and at the top of his field. He spends all day trying to troll libs and upset people online. He doesn't let anything stand in his way and he has a huge collection of banned usernames to prove his greatness. So pretty much the same as your son."

#363 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2021-07-26 07:36 PM | Reply

Goatmam doesn't have to commit suicide. He's slowly giving himself away piece by piece sooo ... .

#364 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 07:38 PM | Reply

Citation needed, dick breath

#355 | POSTED BY SAMS

Your tantrum here, ---------.

#365 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 07:39 PM | Reply

#366 | Posted by sams

You morons always think you've figured out all sorts of grand conspiracies. Maybe you haven't been banned yet because of jewish space lasers or pedophile pizza parlors.

#367 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2021-07-26 07:47 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Can any of you stupid ----- explain why Roger has not deleted the SAMS account yet?

#366 | POSTED BY SAMS

Some people keep tarantulas as pets.

#368 | Posted by Zed at 2021-07-26 07:49 PM | Reply

I'm starting to think it is rcade finally letting his feelings out about us.

#369 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 07:50 PM | Reply

And that's clearly chairborn. Only guy I know who thinks calling somebody some version of a gay slur is "kicking their teeth in."

#370 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 07:52 PM | Reply

Trumpism can be conceptualized as either an empty box or a box filled with sh--.

We are getting confirmation for latter theory.

#371 | Posted by Zed at 2021-07-26 07:59 PM | Reply

where's the worlds most corpulent oil rig worker?

don't lie and say he's busy.

#372 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2021-07-26 08:03 PM | Reply

where's the worlds most corpulent oil rig worker?

Don't be a coward. Please use a name. We have two oil rig worker, but none are corpulent, sissy boy.

#373 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 08:05 PM | Reply

----, we have you guys triggered. This is great.

Yet not one of you has the balls to answer my question, "Why is Roger letting us post?"

Cluck, cluck cluck, mother cluckers.

#374 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 08:07 PM | Reply

----, we have you guys triggered. This is great.

LOL I see y'all are still as dumb as a box of rocks.

Let me guess, he's shutting this place down?

#375 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 08:09 PM | Reply

And that's clearly chairborn.

Pleased to meet you. Hope you guess our names. (of the 6 or so proffered, only one is correct so far.)

#376 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 08:09 PM | Reply

Idk but I for one hopes he steps in soon cause you are really boring

#377 | Posted by truthhurts at 2021-07-26 08:10 PM | Reply

but none are corpulent, sissy boy.

Lol goat posted pics on multiple occasions. Unless things have changed dramatically he was certainly corpulent.

#378 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 08:11 PM | Reply

you are really boring

Yet you cant look away.

#379 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 08:12 PM | Reply

LOL I see y'all are still as dumb as a box of rocks.

As always. Ad hominem and avoiding the issue. You shouldn't let your ego get in the way of facts and logic.

*yawn* J Pee

#380 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 08:14 PM | Reply

I answered the question, box of rocks.

Twice.

#381 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 08:15 PM | Reply

You morons always think you've figured out all sorts of grand conspiracies. Maybe you haven't been banned yet because of jewish space lasers or pedophile pizza parlors.

#367 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY

You are second only to J Pee in stupidity. But at least you don't have that monstrous ego. So there's that.

#382 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 08:16 PM | Reply

Hey ---------, are you gonna whine some more about as hominem?

#383 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 08:18 PM | Reply

And it's not that big of an ego.

I'm just quite obviously your superior.

#384 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 08:19 PM | Reply

Things always look larger when you're looking up.

#385 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 08:19 PM | Reply

And it's not that big of an ego.

That's hilarious J Pee. Even three of the lefties here that I know of find it monstrous but remain silent for partisan reasons.

Of course you wouldn't notice your monster ego. Monster egos *never* notice that in themselves.

Flail away, little man. Flail away.

#387 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 08:23 PM | Reply

Rest assured, J Pee that we are not that much amused watching you deny your huge ego. That has become quite passe.

However, we are greatly amused knowing that there are a lot of leftwingers secretly applauding us for throwing that fact in your face and watching you deny it. There are some people here who agree with you politically, but are dismayed you are so full of yourself. It sickens them. They fondly wish you wouldn't taint their side with your egomaniacal and mostly ad hominem posts. (don't worry, idiots like speaksoftly still think you are the greatest. The true thinkers? Not so much)

And by the way, J Pee: I asked you a question earlier you avoided: Don't you have a life outside of this place?

#388 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 08:33 PM | Reply

Sams is definitely bringing some of that premoderation fun back with him.

Why hasn't RCade banned you yet? He obviously doesn't give a fffk.

Seems like him ignoring you and not giving you what you want, a ban, is really fffking with your head.

Why don't you cry more about it.

#389 | Posted by ClownShack at 2021-07-26 08:38 PM | Reply

#388 I'm sure they'd say something if they thought it. It's not
Like anybody pulls any punches here.

Apparently more of a life than a bunch of butt hurt losers posting -------- all day claiming they're "pushing buttons" or "triggering" people.

#390 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 08:46 PM | Reply

You are second only to J Pee in stupidity. But at least you don't have that monstrous ego. So there's that.

#382 | Posted by sams

Is that the best you've got? I don't even need to insult you. Knowing that this is how you try to make yourself feel good is enough to satisfy me completely.

Tell us about your life sams. So that we might learn from your obvious mistakes.

#391 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2021-07-26 08:49 PM | Reply

Why hasn't RCade banned you yet?

Olympic football?

#392 | Posted by REDIAL at 2021-07-26 08:55 PM | Reply

" (of the 6 or so proffered, only one is correct so far.)"

You're not counting my bitch, Mrs. Danforth. That's two, at least.

Not that anyone would trust you to tell the truth.

#393 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 09:49 PM | Reply

"admit there were different rules here for libs and conservatives?"

There are different rules here for people who are genuine and people who are not.

That probably breaks nicely along political lines, but it's not a liberal vs conservative thing.

GracieAmazed and Boaz are as conservative as they come. What they aren't is disingenuous about their beliefs. They are true to their ignorant, prejudiced selves, without trying to be what they're not.

They don't get cute.

At least one banned poster called himself independent while only ever criticizing the left. Which not only demonstrates the flaw in your false dichotomy, but also my point about getting banned for being relentlessly, pathologically disingenuous.

But what about when Snoofy says Thanks, Capitalism, when he's really calling out the flaws in Capitalism? I don't beat a a dead horse up and down every thread, that's the difference.

#394 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-26 09:51 PM | Reply

Why hasn't RCade banned you yet?
Olympic football?

World Cup Lite.

And by that, I mean the entire Olympics. Olympic soccer alone is not really a thing. It's sort of like the Pro Bowl is to the Super Bowl.

#395 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-26 09:54 PM | Reply

My ego isn't massive, but I think I deserve credit for asking if there was more than one of you behind Sams. I mentioned Jeff & RoC as possible posters (the saner ones). Also LorD (as one of the foul-mouthed contenders). Is any of them right?

As to why RCade hasn't banned you yet: 1) he isn't around; 2) he made some kind of deal/experiment with all you (to shut you up), which hasn't run its course yet; 3) he doesn't want to manage the board anymore, so he doesn't care what goes down; 4) RCade, being bored silly with the board and lusting after the good ole Cruel days, is one of you!

#396 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-26 10:31 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"more than one of you behind Sams."

They're running a train on Sams.

#397 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-26 10:34 PM | Reply

Could be Rex or Goat. Not 101 though because he had more of a sense of humor than any of you have demonstrated so far. Mackris could be in there, but if so, I think someone is proofreading his posts.

#398 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-26 10:35 PM | Reply

Also who was the guy who lived in Louisiana and posted the interview with his two sons? One of you could be him.

#399 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-26 10:38 PM | Reply

Why don't you cry more about it.

Why kid yourself into thinking we're crying, Persian poof? Are you so ------- stupid you can't see we are having a great time? Apparently you are. Stop thinking about ---- for a minute and understand what is going on here.

#400 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 10:42 PM | Reply

Apparently more of a life than a bunch of butt hurt losers posting -------- all day claiming they're "pushing buttons" or "triggering" people

Wrong again, J Pee. Not a single one of us spends a fraction the time here you do. ---- --- breath, your deflections are lame. Normal people would be so ashamed.

Try again.

#401 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 10:44 PM | Reply

Too bad Nulli isn't here. I imagine he would have enjoyed participating.

#402 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-26 10:44 PM | Reply

Tell us about your life sams

OK, -----------. You mean the parts you don't know about when yoy are are begging for and deep --------- my dick?

None of your ------- business. You can't even suck ---- worth a ----, much less anything else.

#403 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 10:46 PM | Reply

Olympic football?

Great answer, Redial. That's why we actually like you. You seem to stand apart from the idiots here.

#404 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 10:47 PM | Reply

Sorry, Snoofy. You're not worthy of a response. Sorry you spent hald the night on the keyboard with your post.

#405 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 10:49 PM | Reply

We love the guessing games. All of your are correct, but are missing out on a dozen more.

#406 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 10:51 PM | Reply

MO could also be:

Sympathy for the devil

www.youtube.com

#407 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-26 10:52 PM | Reply

Sympathy for the devil

Love ya Gal, but that one was a no brainer.

#408 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 10:54 PM | Reply

I thought of this poem, which I've posted before, the other night and which may not be right and may not make sense to anybody but me:

Waiting for the Barbarians
BY C. P. CAVAFY

www.poetryfoundation.org

From the ending:

Why don't our distinguished orators turn up as usual
to make their speeches, say what they have to say?

Because the barbarians are coming today
and they're bored by rhetoric and public speaking.

Why this sudden bewilderment, this confusion?
(How serious people's faces have become.)
Why are the streets and squares emptying so rapidly,
everyone going home lost in thought?

Because night has fallen and the barbarians haven't come.
And some of our men just in from the border say
there are no barbarians any longer.

Now what's going to happen to us without barbarians?
Those people were a kind of solution.

#409 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-26 11:00 PM | Reply

Can we get this thread over the magical 500 posts? How many years since that has happened? (Thanks, sams, says Roger)

I think we can do it if we get the easiest person to troll, Danforth, to respond to our button pushing. Of course we may need a few of J Pee's mindless "your an idiot" posts to shove us above that limit.

#410 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:00 PM | Reply

Come one, Dickforth. Help a brother out. Take that dick out of your mouth and type! The power of God compels you!

#411 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:01 PM | Reply

"Love ya Gal, but that one was a no brainer."

RCade's MO could be sympathy for the devil is a no brainer? Then how come no one guessed that maybe Rogers is letting you post because, despite all the extra work you gave him, he kind of misses you guys?

Oh, hell, I don't know. That you are enjoying yourselves, I get. It's like a game of hide and seek. Or like a story where all the characters merge into one and become interchangeable.

#412 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-26 11:04 PM | Reply

Of course we may need a few of J Pee's mindless "your an idiot" posts to shove us above that limit.

#410 | POSTED BY SAMS

You're.

Definitely not goatshart.

#413 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 11:06 PM | Reply

Gal, you're very warm.

But we give him no extra work. A couple of keystrokes and a click of the mouse and we are history.

#414 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:06 PM | Reply

Definitely not goatshart.

Definitely J Pee.

#415 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:07 PM | Reply

"Can we get this thread over the magical 500 posts? How many years since that has happened?"

Driving up thread counts with repetitive, trolling, ultimately boring posts was Goatman's specialty. If that's your goal and you ain't Goat, send him in, Coach. He's ready to play the game.

#416 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-26 11:09 PM | Reply

But Goatman makes typos, too. So don't be so cocky, J Pee

#417 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:09 PM | Reply

Driving up thread counts with repetitive, trolling, ultimately boring posts was Goatman's specialty. If that's your goal and you ain't Goat, send him in, Coach. He's ready to play the game.

Let me ring him up. I don't mind tag teaming.

#418 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:10 PM | Reply

J Pee, do you have a life outside of this site?

We all know. Even the libs. Have the balls to admit you do not.

#419 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:13 PM | Reply

If one of you is Kanrei, that would be cool!

#420 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-26 11:14 PM | Reply

Roger watching soccer is an amusing excuse for letting us troll the ---- out of this place, but it is no secret Corky has his phone number and has alerted him to us.

So don't pretend he doesn't know what we are doing.

#421 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:16 PM | Reply

"But we give him no extra work. A couple of keystrokes and a click of the mouse and we are history."

Yeah, but what about all the emails? I was under the impression that all the back and forths and so on and so forths could be time consuming.

#422 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-26 11:17 PM | Reply

If one of you is Kanrei, that would be cool!

You can't discount anything.

You're pretty sharp, Gal. Too smart for an echo chamber like this.

#423 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:17 PM | Reply

Definitely not goatshart.

How long can the bloated ------------ remain outdoors before the stench of his rotting flesh attracts vultures?

#424 | Posted by Reinheitsgebot at 2021-07-26 11:22 PM | Reply

Not recently but in the past, I've been to liberal/progressive echo chambers and this ain't one of them.

#425 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-26 11:23 PM | Reply

How long can the bloated ------------ remain outdoors before the stench of his rotting flesh attracts vultures?

About this long --- breath. We're getting closer to our trolling responses. Thank you, you dimwit. Time for your Captain Crunch with -------------.

#426 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:24 PM | Reply

Too smart for an echo chamber like this.

#423 | POSTED BY SAMS

Smarter than you tools isn't a high bar.

#427 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 11:25 PM | Reply

Smarter than you tools isn't a high bar.

You need to shop at other places than Lame-comebacks-R-Us butt muncher.

#428 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:28 PM | Reply

Not recently but in the past, I've been to liberal/progressive echo chambers and this ain't one of them.

Please.

#429 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:29 PM | Reply

"Smarter than you tools isn't a high bar."

Touche! LOL

"The power of God compels you!"

Speaking of Corky, he isn't around much. If he made that phone call, he must have been clued into divine plan.

#430 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-26 11:30 PM | Reply

Finnochio, are you plowing your blown out o-ring with wisgod's skull?

#431 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2021-07-26 11:32 PM | Reply

Dickforth come out, come out wherever you are.

He's our fave.

#432 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:32 PM | Reply

"Can we get this thread over the magical 500 posts? How many years since that has happened?"

Is that the deal? If you can drive up the thread count to 500, you all get to be Drudge Dreamers and receive amnesty (It's not amnesty! It's a pathway to earned user-ship!).

#433 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-26 11:34 PM | Reply

Finnochio, are you plowing your blown out o-ring with wisgod's skull?

I won't destroy your ------------ fantasy by denying it.

#434 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:34 PM | Reply

...amnesty...

This is way more fun than amnesty.

#435 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:35 PM | Reply

"This is way more fun than amnesty."

For you, but after awhile the routine becomes overly familiar once again.

#436 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-26 11:38 PM | Reply

You need to shop at other places than Lame-comebacks-R-Us butt muncher.

#428 | Posted by sams

Butt muncher? LOL

You haven't lived if you've never eaten a fine ass.

#437 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 11:38 PM | Reply

...amnesty...

Besides, why would any of us want to come back just to be treated like ---- again? This is way more fun and I do give Roger credit for allowing it.

#438 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:39 PM | Reply

This is way more fun than amnesty.

#435 | Posted by sams

You really need to get out more.

#439 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 11:39 PM | Reply

For you, but after awhile the routine becomes overly familiar once again.

We understand. We also know those who don't like us can plonk us.

#440 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:41 PM | Reply

You really need to get out more.

Good advice, J Pee. Follow it.

#441 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:42 PM | Reply

You haven't lived if you've never eaten a fine ass.

I'm not a ---- sucker like you. I don't go past the taint.

But have fun. Just pick the corn out your teeth ---- breath.

#442 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:44 PM | Reply

58 more to go

#443 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:45 PM | Reply

Good advice, J Pee. Follow it.

#441 | Posted by sams

I'm not the one who's so limp dicked I have to do whatever it is you're doing for "fun."

This dumb ass "insult" has run its course. Time to call me a ------ maybe?

#444 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 11:45 PM | Reply

The coward Dickforth is absent, but at least J Pee is taking my troll bait

#445 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:45 PM | Reply

"Besides, why would any of us want to come back just to be treated like ---- again?"

Why would you want to come back, period, since you have such a low opinion of so many here? Hold so many in contempt, in fact?

#446 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-26 11:45 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I'm not the one who's so limp dicked I have to do whatever it is you're doing for "fun."

Are you implying I am limp dicked? Explain to the class how ou know that? No need. I will. It's because you still don't know how to suck a ----, even after years of doing it.

#447 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:47 PM | Reply

But have fun. Just pick the corn out your teeth ---- breath.

#442 | Posted by sams

I said fine ass, not skanky ass.

If you were attractive to more than crack heads and meth whores you'd know what I'm talking about.

#448 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 11:48 PM | Reply

"Besides, why would any of us want to come back?"
~Moron who has come back

... ... ... ... ...

Did everyone else's irony meter explode as well?

FFS, I had to replace the last one when this sock puppet claimed he alone was honest.

#449 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-26 11:48 PM | Reply

Why would you want to come back, period, since you have such a low opinion of so many here?

We've answered that so many times in the last few days.

The trolling of idiots. Please don't ask again. That goes for everyone.

#450 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:49 PM | Reply

I said fine ass, not skanky ass.

OK. So you like to eat fine ----. Bully for you, J Pee.

I hope you brush your teeth before you see the dentist or have a good story, feces mouth.

#451 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:50 PM | Reply

Why would you want to come back, period, since you have such a low opinion of so many here? Hold so many in contempt, in fact?

#446 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday

Because their claims of hating this place are just a facade.

They're bitter as ---- but lack the sack to genuinely asked to be allowed back in.

#452 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 11:50 PM | Reply

It's because you still don't know how to suck a ----

"You're gay"

Good one. Does that mean Rex is back for the night shift?

#453 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 11:52 PM | Reply

If you were attractive to more than crack heads and meth whores you'd know what I'm talking about.

Do you have any idea how pathetically lame your comebacks are? Seriously. I don't think you do.

#454 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:53 PM | Reply

The trolling of idiots. Please don't ask again. That goes for everyone.

#450 | Posted by sams

You clearly don't know what trolling is.

Because what you're doing is not it.

#455 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 11:54 PM | Reply

So much crudeness, so much of the time:

Bleecker Street, Summer
BY DEREK WALCOTT

Summer for prose and lemons, for nakedness and languor,
for the eternal idleness of the imagined return,
for rare flutes and bare feet, and the August bedroom
of tangled sheets and the Sunday salt, ah violin!

. . .

There is the Hudson, like the sea aflame.
I would undress you in the summer heat,
and laugh and dry your damp flesh if you came.

www.poetryfoundation.org

#456 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-26 11:54 PM | Reply

Does that mean Rex is back for the night shift?

I dunno. Who is Rex?

#457 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:54 PM | Reply

Do you have any idea how pathetically lame your comebacks are? Seriously. I don't think you do.

#454 | Posted by sams

Well I see that in your time away you didn't gain any sense of self-awareness.

#458 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-26 11:55 PM | Reply

Because what you're doing is not it.

So sayeth the guy who keeps gobbling the troll bait.

#459 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:55 PM | Reply

Well I see that in your time away you didn't gain any sense of self-awareness.

And another zinger from J Pee the faux doctor.

You should have made your dissertation on "Great comebacks on a liberal echo chamber"

#460 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:57 PM | Reply

J Pee: Come at me, bro!

#461 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:57 PM | Reply

"We've answered that so many times in the last few days.
The trolling of idiots. Please don't ask again. That goes for everyone."

And now for your moment of Zen:

If you spend your time trolling idiots, what does that make you?

#462 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-26 11:58 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Don't worry, Dickforth. J Pee is just as good of a battering buddy.

#463 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:58 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

If you spend your time trolling idiots, what does that make you?

A troller of idiots, of course.

#464 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-26 11:59 PM | Reply

So sayeth the guy who keeps gobbling the troll bait.

#459 | Posted by sams

Except you're not trolling.

We're well aware of what you're doing and happily throw our piles of ---- back at you.

#465 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-27 12:00 AM | Reply

36 to go

#466 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:00 AM | Reply

Except you're not trolling.

Except you keep biting, J Pee.

#467 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:01 AM | Reply

(passing the baton. I have to eat)

Go.

#468 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:01 AM | Reply

"The trolling of idiots. Please don't ask again. That goes for everyone."

What a riot.

Every time you answer the same question, you've been trolled. The only reason people are asking you the same question, is to troll you.

Knowing that, why do you bother coming here?

#469 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-27 12:02 AM | Reply

Yea! I take the baton and Dickforth arrives!

How are you this eveing, dickbreath. Was the --- soup dinner good?

#470 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:03 AM | Reply

"A troller of idiots, of course."

Or just an idiot? With the same kind of massive ego you accuse others of being overtaken by?

"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
--Albert Einstein

#471 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-27 12:03 AM | Reply

Knowing that, why do you bother coming here?

For the billionth time, Dickforth, to troll idiots like you.

You a ------- slow learner. --- must clog your brain.

#472 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:04 AM | Reply

Except you keep biting, J Pee.

#467 | Posted by sams

Rubbing your face in your piles isn't "biting."

#473 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-27 12:04 AM | Reply

Or just an idiot?

If you wish. The pejorative is subjective. I don't pretend to know your mind.

#474 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:06 AM | Reply

Rubbing your face in your piles isn't "biting."

Claiming you rubbed my face into anything is a cute self congratulatory effort. Bully for you.

#475 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:07 AM | Reply

Again for the umpteenth time. Do you have a live outside of this place, J Pee?

#476 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:08 AM | Reply

24

#477 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:08 AM | Reply

There is no other poster who spends as much time here as the faux doctor. Do you think no one notices that, J Pee?

#478 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:09 AM | Reply

Claiming you rubbed my face into anything is a cute self congratulatory effort. Bully for you.

#475 | Posted by sams

You mean like self-congratulatory claims of trolling everyone here or others being a good "battering buddy"?

#479 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-27 12:10 AM | Reply

----. I should have metered my bashing of Dickforth. He slinked off.

#480 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:11 AM | Reply

500 is the magic number for what? And how many of your posts get subtracted off the total since you are mainly trolling, by your own admission?

#481 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-27 12:11 AM | Reply

On what basis do you make that statement?

Are you even more pathetic than anyone thought and you lurk, longingly reading threads you can't post on?

*SMH*

#482 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-27 12:12 AM | Reply

You mean like self-congratulatory claims of trolling everyone here or others being a good "battering buddy"?

Again, the shopper of "Lame-comebacks-R-us" blesses us with the stale "you mean...." comeboack.

You really are clueless to what an idiot you are, aren't you, J Pee?

#483 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:13 AM | Reply

500 is the magic number for what?

For Roger. It's been years since he had a thread do that. And he will have his the posters he booted for countering his narrative to thank for it. Quite an irony, huh?

#484 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:15 AM | Reply

16

#485 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:16 AM | Reply

Do something original, J Pee.

Please?

#486 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:17 AM | Reply

Are you so ------- stupid you can't see we are having a great time?
#400 | POSTED BY SAMS

Is that why you keep posting swan songs and crying about your looming ban?

You brain dead re tar d.

Cry some more.

#487 | Posted by ClownShack at 2021-07-27 12:17 AM | Reply

*SMH*

Is that rattling sound annoying, J Pee?

#488 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:18 AM | Reply

Is that why you keep posting swan songs and crying about your looming ban?

Yes. Duh, Persian poof

#489 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:19 AM | Reply

#472
Trolled again!

So why do you come here?

Dance, puppet!

#490 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-27 12:20 AM | Reply

For Roger. It's been years since he had a thread do that. And he will have his the posters he booted for countering his narrative to thank for it. Quite an irony, huh?
#484 | POSTED BY SAMS

That's the quantity, but what's the quality? How many people other than the ones posting in it are actually reading this whole thread? Hell, I'm posting in it, and I haven't read it all. Size matters, but it isn't everything.

#491 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-27 12:21 AM | Reply

So why do you come here?

Another slow learner.

To troll idiots like you.

#492 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:21 AM | Reply

And he will have his the posters he booted for countering his narrative to thank for it. Quite an irony, huh?

#484 | Posted by sams

Yes, I know I would be proud to stand there and let people kick me in the balls over and over.

The discord sausage party must be a sad sad place.

#493 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-27 12:22 AM | Reply

Is the 500th post the one where you turn into Cinderfella and your carriage turns back into a pumpkin? That would be ironic.

#494 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-27 12:23 AM | Reply

Size matters, but it isn't everything.

#491 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday

Do you really think those tools have size or talent?

#495 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-27 12:23 AM | Reply

Dance, puppet!

Who is the long established poster and who is the three day old poster?

Who's trolling whom, idiot. ---- I hate explaining the obvious.

#496 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:23 AM | Reply

4

#497 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:24 AM | Reply

Troll is so stupid he doesn't recognize being trolled.

The comedy just writes itself.

#498 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-27 12:24 AM | Reply

"Who is the long established poster and who is the three day old poster?"

You and not you. Or put another way: you and no one.

#499 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-27 12:27 AM | Reply

Tootles.

#500 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-27 12:27 AM | Reply

... writes itself.

You shop at Lame-comebacks-R-us too, I see, Dickforth.

#501 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:28 AM | Reply

This thread is the equivalent of those videos where the opposing team lets the disabled kid run for a touchdown.

Just like the disabled kid, sams is apparently unaware that the play isn't real.

Enjoy your 500 post participation thread, losers.

#502 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-27 12:28 AM | Reply

You and not you. Or put another way: you and no one.

You're good, Gal. You've earned our respect. No lame comebacks from you unlike the brainless J Pee and Dickforth.

#503 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:29 AM | Reply

Let me prove what a troll fish you are:

Why do you come here?

#504 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-27 12:29 AM | Reply

So how does it feel to have your teeth kicked in by the disabled kid, J Pee? Sure that is what has happened considering you decades old trite and stale comebacks.

You and your monstrous ego amuse us.

#505 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:31 AM | Reply

Why do you come here?

If I explained that again for the hundreth time, you would still ask again --- breath.

Why waste answering a slow learner?

#506 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:33 AM | Reply

So how does it feel to have your teeth kicked in by the disabled kid, J Pee?

LOL

Bless rcade's heart for letting you ------- "score."

#507 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-27 12:33 AM | Reply

" Dickforth"

Lame, especially the fortieth time.

I must've really handed you your ass in your prior life to be so butthurt. You really are my bitch.

#508 | Posted by Danforth at 2021-07-27 12:34 AM | Reply

Let me prove what a troll fish you are:

And yes, I admit for the hundredth time I am a troll. Trolls don't exist in a vacuum. They need idiots like you to survive. You've heard the saying, "Don't feed the troll". I'm glad you do.

#509 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:35 AM | Reply

I must've really handed you your ass in your prior life to be so butthurt.

You sure did, DIckforth.

#510 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:36 AM | Reply

But I admit I am not that good of a troll. I couldn't keep J Pee on the hook. ------ vanished.

Looks like it's you and me again, Dickforth.

#511 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:37 AM | Reply

They're all our bitches.

No other explanation for the pathetic behavior of supposed adults making accounts to "troll" people they don't like on a site they took their ball and ran away from.

Because they're pathetic bitches justifying their lashing out.

#512 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-27 12:37 AM | Reply

YEA! J Pee is back!

#513 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:38 AM | Reply

Because they're pathetic bitches justifying their lashing out.

And yet, this pathetic bitch can keep you coming back!

#514 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:39 AM | Reply

I really do love this game.

#515 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:39 AM | Reply

Dickforth?

#516 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:40 AM | Reply

Why doesn't Roger delete me?

J Pee?
Dickforth?

Any clues?

#517 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:41 AM | Reply

Pity I would imagine.

Don't really care, honestly.

#518 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-27 12:42 AM | Reply

Roger is channeling himself through me. He lets me survive because he knows I am saying the things to his most idiotic posters he doesn't have the balls to say himself.

#519 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:43 AM | Reply

You still can't figure out why Roger allows us to continue, can you you imbecile J Pee?

#521 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:48 AM | Reply

----. I'm losing my game. Somehow J Pee and Dickforth let go of my hook.

#522 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:51 AM | Reply

J Pee?

#523 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:54 AM | Reply

Dickforth?

#524 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:54 AM | Reply

----. I didn't expect to win this easily.

#525 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:55 AM | Reply

I'm still wondering if J Pee has a life outside of this blog.

#526 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 12:56 AM | Reply

#522 You could try following your own advice:

Do something original, J Pee.
Please?
#486 | POSTED BY SAMS

Sorry. Just sayin'.

#527 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-27 12:57 AM | Reply

You still can't figure out why Roger allows us to continue
#521 | POSTED BY SAMS

He allows you to continue, much in the same way you allow a drunk to continue to make a jacka$$ out of themselves. For the entertainment, to point and laugh.

Probably the most fun you have had since he banned you all.

Cry some more.

:( :( :(

#528 | Posted by ClownShack at 2021-07-27 12:58 AM | Reply

I didn't expect to win this easily.
#525 | POSTED BY SAMS

The victory lap announcement.

Priceless.

#529 | Posted by ClownShack at 2021-07-27 12:59 AM | Reply

I really do love this game.
POSTED BY SAMS

Even when you are playing with yourself? Granted your solitary, self-gratification/congratulations doesn't last long before some "idiot" comes along and takes the bait.

It takes two to tango, but in the break between dances, do you chat up the backstage audience and isn't that half the fun? Kind of like Gracie's pleasure in sharing Nooner posts with the other pool ladies.

#530 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-27 01:04 AM | Reply

Priceless

Indeed.

#531 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 01:04 AM | Reply

You lame ---- headed idiots still can't figure it out, can you? I even explained it in detail many posts ago.

Such dullards.

#533 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 01:11 AM | Reply

GAL

I'm surprised that our political warriors on this site are allowing this jerk to hijack entire threads again. I say "again" because it's happened before with the nasty back and forth exchanges of wit (or witless) exchanged with Goatman that went on for days. Making every thread about himself was Goat's stock in trade.

You'd think they'd learn, wouldn't you.

#534 | Posted by Twinpac at 2021-07-27 01:22 AM | Reply

...our political warriors...

for ----- sake.

I'm surprised that our political warriors on this site are allowing this jerk to hijack entire threads again.
...
You'd think they'd learn, wouldn't you.

Yes, you do think they'd learn. But they don't. I'm in control

#535 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 01:25 AM | Reply

Don't you have some misguided ---- you can slap around with your bat-wing ----- flaps, Twinpac? Get the ---- off of my site, --------------.

#536 | Posted by sams at 2021-07-27 01:42 AM | Reply

"Why doesn't Roger delete me?"

I know! I know! I'd like to solve the puzzle, Pat! One of you is RCade's mom!

But seriously, the one fly in the ointment of your explanation:

"Roger is channeling himself through me. He lets me survive because he knows I am saying the things to his most idiotic posters he doesn't have the balls to say himself."

is that RCade has never been shy about expressing himself, so the notion that he doesn't have the balls to do so now doesn't fit for me.

"I'm in control."

Yesterday you were expecting to be banned at any time, but now you are in control? This does not compute.

#537 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-27 02:43 AM | Reply

Stepping back, I noticed the following:

Eberly's last post before today:
POSTED BY EBERLY AT 2021-07-22 10:33 AM | REPLY
First post by SAMS:
POSTED BY SAMS AT 2021-07-22 10:41 PM | REPLY

Last post by SAMS:
POSTED BY SAMS AT 2021-07-27 01:42 AM | REPLY
First post from Eberly today:
POSTED BY EBERLY AT 2021-07-27 09:08 AM | REPLY

#538 | Posted by YAV at 2021-07-27 09:18 AM | Reply

(By the way, I hope your vacation was wonderful, Eberly! Welcome back!)

#540 | Posted by YAV at 2021-07-27 09:39 AM | Reply

I know Eberly - I was having fun with the coincidence. :)

#541 | Posted by YAV at 2021-07-27 09:40 AM | Reply

I imagine it's sobering. I know how some places take on a whole different characteristic after events happen - after history happens. I lived in D.C. for a bit.

So glad you had a good trip, and seriously, welcome back!

#543 | Posted by YAV at 2021-07-27 09:48 AM | Reply

I'm not him, Yav.

#539 | POSTED BY EBERLY >

LOL not gonna like I thought you might have been one of them.

#545 | Posted by jpw at 2021-07-27 10:45 AM | Reply

Eberly, not being a closeted gay, doesn't talk about ----- and --- that much.
(Apologies if I have mischaracterized you, Eberly.)

#546 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-27 10:47 AM | Reply

SAMS

Seniority: 291

Private E-mail

Joined 2021/03/26
Visited 2021/07/27

Status: visitor

#547 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2021-07-27 10:50 AM | Reply

Status: visitor

Mission Accomplished!

#548 | Posted by ClownShack at 2021-07-27 12:57 PM | Reply

Yes, you do think they'd learn. But they don't. I'm in control

#535 | Posted by sams

"I'm in control" the man tells himself, gripping the bathroom countertop. Watching the sweat drip down his brow in the mirror. "I'm in control" he repeats, hitting SEND on another online post filled with hatred, ignorance, and gay sexual innuendo. The nightmares are becoming too much for him to bear. Night after night. The naked torsos of muscular men, pressing him down into the mattress. He hates it, but somehow it feels so right.

"I'm in control" he repeats. Shoving the thoughts away. He doesn't really want to suck a dick, he tells himself, chasing the thoughts out of his mind the way he has so many times before. But he can't make them stay away. Maybe this is why he can't have sex with women. Maybe this is what he's always wanted.

"I'm in control." He lashes out again, posting another rant aimed at liberals, at immigrants, at foreigners, especially at gays, with their freshly fragranced bodies in gym-tastic shape. He grips his head trying to silence the thoughts but they can't be silenced.

So he grabs his keys and heads to the local gun shop.

#549 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2021-07-27 01:48 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Abd we didn't get to 750.
Shame.

#550 | Posted by snoofy at 2021-07-27 03:08 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2021 World Readable

Drudge Retort