I have 30 years experience maintaining accounting information systems and understand checks and balances to insure integrity and accuracy.
I am my own expert as I am regarded as trustworthy and capable by people where I have worked.
In addition to setting up, training and maintaining networked integrated accounting software and ledgers, I also installed all networking going back to Novell up through Windows Servers and all PC repair. My job now is less maintenance and more straight up accounting.
Mail-in ballots as they were done this past election is not adequate for voting systems.
And recounts have minimal value for hap hazard mail-in ballots that are mailed out to anyone and used at will.
It would be like sending cash through the mail to your bank when you have no idea how much you put in the envelope or envelopes to begin with.
After being deposited you want to verify all the money was put in your account.
How would you know?
Lets suppose your cash was kept separate at the bank and able to be recounted.
$1,254 was put into your account and the cash they have of yours is $1,254.
What does that prove? The bank didn't steal any of it but it doesn't prove if all of it got there since you didn't know how much in the first place.
Democrats are saying recounts are proof there were no irregularities. No it's not.
How can you possibly say all of the cash you sent is in your account without something to verify it against.
Absentee ballots where you must request one before it is sent to you creates checks and balances.
Mail-in ballots as they were processed this past election is not adequate for votes which in my opinion is more valuable than money yet they were treated like raffle tickets.
We can't hold more elections like this if we want public trust.
Do Democrats really care about public trust or just implementing a system where they can harvest votes?