Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, January 11, 2022

The Department of Justice is opening a new unit to investigate acts of domestic terrorism, a top national security official said during a Senate committee hearing on Tuesday.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"The testimony of Matthew Olsen, assistant attorney general of the department's National Security Division, before the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday came less than a week after the first anniversary of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, which some lawmakers believe was an act of terrorism and those responsible should be given additional federal terrorism charges.

Olsen said, based on assessments from the intelligence community, that the country faces "an elevated threat from domestic violent extremists " that is, individuals in the United States who seek to commit violent criminal acts in furtherance of domestic social or political goals."

About time....

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2022-01-11 03:03 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

If you ignore all the times right-wing Americans have killed people, it's never happened. Not even once.

#2 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-01-11 04:43 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Of course they don't view all of the 2020 riots as acts of domestic terrorism.

I do remember a day when liberals would view this type of thing as intrusive, kind of like how many liberals reacted to the Patriot Act. Sadly, those liberals don't seem to exist any more.

#3 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-11 04:48 PM | Reply

"Of course they don't view all of the 2020 riots as acts of domestic terrorism."

Maybe because ~93% of the protests were peaceful.
time.com

#4 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-01-11 04:51 PM | Reply

#4 That 7% resulted in over a dozen homicides, hundreds of injured police and $2 Billion in property damage resulting in livelihoods lost for an awful lot of people. If that isn't domestic terrorism I don't know what is.

#5 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-11 04:54 PM | Reply

"That 7% resulted in..."

Over 10,000 protests. THAT's what you've been comparing 1/6 to this whole time. ONE incident to 10,100 protests.

"If that isn't domestic terrorism I don't know what is."

I certainly agree with you there. But I'm interested what percentage of responsibility the Party of Responsibility should take.

#6 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-01-11 04:59 PM | Reply

"I do remember a day when liberals would view this type of thing as intrusive"

Investigating groups with the highest penchant for violence against America and Americans?!? Are you daft?!?

Oh, wait...I get it.

Careful you don't smoke around all that straw.

#7 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-01-11 05:02 PM | Reply

This isn't the government's first time at making protests end up looking different that what was intended.

over 10K protests...all it takes is for a few to get out of hand.

7% is enough.

It's easy to spin that.

#8 | Posted by eberly at 2022-01-11 05:04 PM | Reply

The FBI, the DOJ, the DHS have for years been saying that terrorism in this country is more likely domestic rather than foreign, by far... and is mostly from white nationalists, and rarely from anyone else.

The prevarications we hear from rwingers is just obfuscation for said white nationalists.

#9 | Posted by Corky at 2022-01-11 05:04 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

Good thing we've waited so long. One of them might blow up a building.

#10 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2022-01-11 06:05 PM | Reply

@#3 ... Of course they don't view all of the 2020 riots as acts of domestic terrorism. ...

1) define "domestic terrorism."

2) substantiate why and how "all of the 2020 riots" meet that definition.

#11 | Posted by LampLighter at 2022-01-11 07:05 PM | Reply


@#9 ... The FBI, the DOJ, the DHS have for years been saying that terrorism in this country is more likely domestic rather than foreign, by far... and is mostly from white nationalists, and rarely from anyone else. ...

New Domestic Terrorism Strategy Focuses on Threat Detection, Countering Recruitment (June 2021)
www.hstoday.us

...The White House today revealed a new strategy to confront domestic terrorism that focuses on improving threat information flows, targeting online recruitment materials, "tackling racism" that feeds "the most persistent and lethal" extremist violence, and enacting better pre- and post-hiring screening to spot extremists in sensitive jobs such as federal law enforcement or the military.

"Too often over the past several years, American communities have felt the wrenching pain of domestic terrorism. Black church members slaughtered during their bible study in Charleston. A synagogue in Pittsburgh targeted for supporting immigrants. A gunman spraying bullets at an El Paso Walmart to target Latinos," President Biden says in the document's introduction. "It goes against everything our country strives to stand for in the world, and it poses a direct challenge to America's national security, our democracy, and our national unity."...


#12 | Posted by LampLighter at 2022-01-11 07:10 PM | Reply

#11 They certainly fit the description better than angry parents getting loud at school board meetings, which our AG labels those people as domestic terrorists.

#13 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-11 07:11 PM | Reply

"angry parents getting loud at school board meetings"

They shouldn't come to meetings if they can't control their emotions.
I would be fine with barring all of them from future meetings. You okay with that?

#14 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-01-11 07:22 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

"over 10K protests...all it takes is for a few to get out of hand."

Agreed, but that's not the point. The point is the typical protest was peaceful, and folks comparing 1/6 with the 2020 BLM protests always take an amalgamation of ALL of the results for comparison.

And that's AFTER ignoring the fact one set was based on a brutal truth, and fomented by all types, while the other was based a brutal lie, fomented almost exclusively by right-wingers and their leaders.

#15 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-01-11 07:25 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#13 ... They certainly fit the description ...

What description is that?

1) define "domestic terrorism."

2) substantiate why and how "all of the 2020 riots" meet that definition.

I even gave you a huge hint....

#16 | Posted by LampLighter at 2022-01-11 07:28 PM | Reply

"7% is enough. It's easy to spin that."

Only if you use Republican Math.

Real math shows the protests were, on average, A LOT safer, calmer, saner, and peaceful than 1/6.

For example, how many people would you use for the "average" protest?

#17 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-01-11 07:53 PM | Reply

I do remember a day when...

35% of the electorate wasn't out and out fascist, anti-democratic --------- claiming to be the good guys.

#18 | Posted by jpw at 2022-01-11 09:41 PM | Reply

If that isn't domestic terrorism I don't know what is.

#5 | Posted by BellRinger

Wouldn't be the first think you didn't know.

#19 | Posted by jpw at 2022-01-11 09:51 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

They certainly fit the description better than angry parents getting loud at school board meetings, which our AG labels those people as domestic terrorists.

#13 | Posted by BellRinger

What about the ones threatening violence against school board members? What would you call that?

#20 | Posted by jpw at 2022-01-11 09:59 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

What would you call that?

#20 | POSTED BY JPW AT 2022-01-11 09:59 PM

A local law enforcement issue.

#21 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-11 10:25 PM | Reply

They get Federal money, so it's a Federal issue.

#22 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-01-11 10:28 PM | Reply

#22 That's not how it works.

#23 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-11 10:29 PM | Reply

A local law enforcement issue.

#21 | Posted by BellRinger

But yet the usual scum who use protests as cover to cause trouble aren't...

Right. Gotcha.

#24 | Posted by jpw at 2022-01-11 10:39 PM | Reply

#20 The FBI just called threats of violence, domestic terrorism. I agree.

#25 | Posted by bored at 2022-01-11 11:16 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#23 ... that's not how it works. ...

Then please describe how it does work.

#26 | Posted by LampLighter at 2022-01-11 11:43 PM | Reply

Biden should name the FBI unit Inglorious bastards and put a bat in every interrogation room.

#27 | Posted by bored at 2022-01-12 12:09 AM | Reply

More bad news for the ------------, cop-killing supporters of the demented orange pedo.

#28 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2022-01-12 01:18 AM | Reply

"...angry parents getting loud at school board meetings, which our AG labels those people as domestic terrorists."

False. One step away from pants on fire.
www.politifact.com

#29 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-01-12 02:35 AM | Reply

Leader of Neo-Nazi Group Sentenced

SSentinel is being sentenced? Oh no!

Hopeful Eberly is around to defend him.

#30 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-01-12 02:38 AM | Reply

POSTED BY BELLRINGER

BellRinger is here to defend domestic terrorists and Nazis?

Can't say I'm surprised.

Bet he'll be cheering when Republicans use it to arrest Democratic protesters.

#31 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-01-12 02:41 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

They certainly fit the description better than angry parents getting loud at school board meetings

A. They shouldn't be loud and angry. Children get loud and angry when they don't get their way.

B. They shouldn't follow doctors and board members to their cars while screaming at them "we know where you live" and "we will find you".

c. They shouldn't show up at these peoples homes carrying weapons.

What they are doing is the definition of terrorism.

terrorism
tr'-rz'm
noun

The use of violence or the threat of violence, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political goals.
Resort to terrorizing methods as a means of coercion, or the state of fear and submission produced by the prevalence of such methods.
The act of terrorizing, or state of being terrorized; a mode of government by terror or intimidation.

#32 | Posted by Nixon at 2022-01-12 11:46 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Lots of these 1/6 terrorists crossed state lines to commit their acts of terrorism.

That makes it a federal issue.

#33 | Posted by Nixon at 2022-01-12 11:49 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#33 For the purpose of 1/6, yes.

Parents at school board meetings?

No.

#34 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-12 12:05 PM | Reply

angry parents getting loud at school board meetings, which our AG labels those people as domestic terrorists.
#13 | Posted by BellRinger

No he doesn't you ------- liar.

#35 | Posted by JOE at 2022-01-12 12:15 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

So the Biden administration reaches out and solicits the infamous letter from the NSBA (this is a new story) and then turns around and uses that letter as justification for the AG to recommend the FBI get involved with these "threats of violence" (I have yet to see any specifics given). Then, former FBI #2 guy goes in front of a camera and says we need to focus not just on fringe elements but more mainstream aspects of the right in this country. And we are expected to take it as a matter of faith that this new task force and initiative from Garland is completely on the up-and-up and is in no way to be used as an intimidation tactic or worse, especially given the FBI's atrocious recent track record of unlawfully obtaining FISA warrants from FISC (this practice goes way beyond just Carter Page).

I will say that nothing untoward with this has happened yet (that we know of). And I will acknowledge that I am putting the cart ahead of the horse. Having made those acknowledgements these are people who have no business being given any benefit of doubt.

#36 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-12 01:11 PM | Reply

None of that validates your lie, liar.

#37 | Posted by JOE at 2022-01-12 01:46 PM | Reply

So I take it you are a bootlicker.

#38 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-12 02:23 PM | Reply

You accept the "official" explanation without a hint of skepticism.

#39 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-12 02:25 PM | Reply

We all know you would have been completely insoucuant had the FBI set up a left wing domestic terrorism task force in the wake of the 2020 riots. You know real, pervasive, deadly and devastating acts of violence.

#40 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-12 02:27 PM | Reply

"given the FBI's atrocious recent track record"

Don't like the police? Work to defund them.

#41 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-01-12 02:39 PM | Reply

BellRinger, fighting to defend his domestic terrorist brethren.

#42 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-01-12 02:44 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

And we are expected to take it as a matter of faith that this new task force and initiative from Garland is completely on the up-and-up

So misrepresentations to justify faux victim, conspiracy BS.

Shocking.

#43 | Posted by jpw at 2022-01-12 02:45 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

You accept the "official" explanation without a hint of skepticism.

#39 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

You accept right wing noise machine -------- without a hint of skepticism.

And when it comes to facts or conspiracy -------- narratives...you choose the -------- narrative.

#44 | Posted by jpw at 2022-01-12 02:47 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Yeah, you're right. The FBI has such a stellar legacy. No reason to have even an iota of skepticism toward the things they do. Blind acceptance and subservience is the key.

#45 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-12 02:55 PM | Reply

J Edgar Hoover would have loved you.

#46 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-12 02:58 PM | Reply

You accept the "official" explanation without a hint of skepticism.
#39 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

This isn't about an "explanation." This is about you claiming that Garland "labeled" loud parents as "domestic terrorists." He never did anything like that. You're literally just lying.

#47 | Posted by JOE at 2022-01-12 03:20 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

You're literally just lying.

That's what BellRinger does.

He lies.

Often and repeatedly.

Like his orange idol, Trump.

#48 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-01-12 03:24 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

You do realize he's never going to admit that is what is being done. I have no doubt you'd uncritically accept Bill Barr's explanation if this was his initiative.

Having said all of that, I don't have any proof of wrongdoing as far as potentially targeting parents goes.

#49 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-12 03:28 PM | Reply

I have no doubt you'd uncritically accept Bill Barr's explanation if this was his initiative.

If Bill Barr said "i will work with state and local law enforcement to investigate violations of existing law when it comes to threats of violence against state and local officials," yeah, that would sound fine to me.

I don't have any proof

I know. Youre just lying.

#50 | Posted by JOE at 2022-01-12 03:35 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

If Bill Barr said "i will work with state and local law enforcement to investigate violations of existing law when it comes to threats of violence against state and local officials," yeah, that would sound fine to me

I find that hard to believe. However, it's a hypothetical and I'll take you at your word.

#51 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-12 03:42 PM | Reply

Good. Now let's move away from the land of hypotheticals and get back to your patently false accusation. The only thing Garland ever said was essentially what i described above. Neither his statement nor his actions have even approached designating loud parents as domestic terrorists. So why do you lie about this?

#52 | Posted by JOE at 2022-01-12 03:49 PM | Reply

So, the DOJ takes action on a letter from the NSBA (later disavowed by the NSBA) and we are now learning that it appears as if the Biden administration solicited that letter from the NSBA to use as a predicate to get the FBI involved.

That doesn't raise any questions for you? None whatsoever?

#53 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-12 03:55 PM | Reply

Sounds like an ancillary objection to process and demonization of an organization. You can point to nothing Garland had said or done to support your claims. Nothing. That makes you a liar.

#54 | Posted by JOE at 2022-01-12 04:03 PM | Reply

Organization i dont like: "Help! Public officials are being stalked, harassed and threatened with violence!"

AG: "I will look into that and try to stop the crimes."

Jeff: "This is terrible, loud parents are being designated as domestic terrorists."

Do you have any idea how ridiculous you look here?

#55 | Posted by JOE at 2022-01-12 04:06 PM | Reply

Ancilliary objection to the process?

Do YOU have any idea how ridiculous YOU sound right now?

Unless people are crossing state lines this is a local issue. Further, unlike the 2020 riots (some of which targeted federal buildings) I haven't seen a single report of actual violence. Not one. One father was removed for "disorderly conduct". He got vocal with a woman who accused his daughter who was a victim of sexual assault in a girl's restroom at school as a liar. The school covered it up and lied about the incident and then quietly transferred the boy (who apparently identifies as a girl) to another school where he assaulted another girl.

#56 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-12 04:13 PM | Reply

"Unless people are crossing state lines this is a local issue."

Biden made it a Federal issue. He gets to do that.

Don't like having a Federal government? Work to go back to a Confederacy.

#57 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-01-12 04:15 PM | Reply

"That doesn't raise any questions for you? None whatsoever?"

What questions is it supposed to raise?

#58 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-01-12 04:17 PM | Reply

If the Biden administration solicited the letter....then this is something they wanted but didn't have justification and thus had to manufacture justification vis a vis the NSBA letter.

#59 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-12 04:21 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

So, the DOJ takes action on a letter from the NSBA (later disavowed by the NSBA) and we are now learning that it appears as if the Biden administration solicited that letter from the NSBA to use as a predicate to get the FBI involved.
That doesn't raise any questions for you? None whatsoever?

#53 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Well, since you are a known liar, nothing you post can be taken without a pound of salt. So the exact and specific meaning of each and every word of every post you post has to be researched and vetted.

Of course, it is highly likely that you are generally obfuscating here. That the DoJ is taking appropriate measures to investigate potential threats against school board members. Something that has been an obvious issue for months because of Covid.

But, instead of considering this a simple issue, you have a need, a drive per say, to make this action seem devious and underhanded.

Again, since you are a known liar, the proper action is to just ignore you.

#60 | Posted by truthhurts at 2022-01-12 04:32 PM | Reply

If the Biden administration solicited the letter....then this is something they wanted but didn't have justification and thus had to manufacture justification vis a vis the NSBA letter.

#59 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Why would the DoJ need justification to investigate potential threats against school administrators?

#61 | Posted by truthhurts at 2022-01-12 04:34 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

It's. A. Local. Law. Enforcement. Issue.

The FBI does NOT have jurisdiction over anything and everything it wants. I am not aware of any police departments asking for FBI help with these alleged threats.

#62 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-12 04:55 PM | Reply

It's. A. Local. Law. Enforcement. Issue.
The FBI does NOT have jurisdiction over anything and everything it wants. I am not aware of any police departments asking for FBI help with these alleged threats.

#62 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER A

If a threat was mailed or crosses a state line, i.e. the internet, it is an FBI case.

#63 | Posted by truthhurts at 2022-01-12 04:58 PM | Reply

#63 Just being on the internet doesn't mean it crosses state lines. IP address would have to be tracked. I suppose maybe someone using VPN could have an email route out of state but even in those instances my understanding is protocol is that the locals need to request assistance.

#64 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-12 05:05 PM | Reply

#63 Just being on the internet doesn't mean it crosses state lines. IP address would have to be tracked. I suppose maybe someone using VPN could have an email route out of state but even in those instances my understanding is protocol is that the locals need to request assistance.

#64 | POSTED BY BELLRINGE

IOW, this is as close as you are willing to go to admit you are full of ----.

#65 | Posted by truthhurts at 2022-01-12 05:08 PM | Reply

No. I stand by that it's a local law enforcement issue. Typically email threats aren't treated very seriously, particularly if they are generic. They are not too difficult to run down.

Again, this "help" wasn't requested. The NSBA has backed off and I haven't seen any police department request federal assistance with this. The most charitable explanation is the DOJ/DBI are overstepping their bounds.

#66 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-12 05:19 PM | Reply

The FBI devotes resources to state and local law enforcement all the time. That you've chosen to object to that when teachers' lives are being threatened reveals your true colors (as if we couldn't see them already).

#67 | Posted by JOE at 2022-01-12 05:45 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

You're a ------- idiot.

School board members, hell, anyone gets a credible death threat in the mail, the FBI will be involved. If they get credible death threats in email and the email crossed state lines, the FBI will be involved. End of Story. that is what they do.

but go ahead, spend another 100 posts defending the indefensible, that is your M.0.

What happened was there was a lot of stories over the past year of threats against school board members. there were many school board members receiving death threats. the DoJ, through the FBI does what they are supposed to do, investigate them. The announce publicly that they are on it, cause they are supposed to be on it. Since there were so many stories being published it was a good idea to publicize it, cause it, you know would maybe scare off a few asshats. So, maybe, the WH reached out to the NSBA to get their support, so what?

But, no you can't admit, that the DoJ doing their jobs is a reasonable thing to do. Because you are a piece of ----. And you lie.

Noone around here has any respect for you, you should just go away.

#68 | Posted by truthhurts at 2022-01-12 05:45 PM | Reply

it's a local law enforcement issue

Literally who ------- gives a ----? Crime is crime. Do you like violent threats? Do you want them to stop? If so then you should support every effort directed to that.

If your spouse was threatened and the FBI showed up to help would you turn them away because nobody had proven to you that they had jurisdiction? Just ---- off already dude.

#69 | Posted by JOE at 2022-01-12 05:48 PM | Reply

"you are full of ----.

you should just go away.

You're a ------- idiot.

Just ---- off already dude."

You guys talk prettier than a $20 whore.

#70 | Posted by eberly at 2022-01-12 05:52 PM | Reply

You don't pay a whore for talking.

#71 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-01-12 06:06 PM | Reply

The FBI involvement was not Properly Predicated.
--You Know Who

#72 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-01-12 06:07 PM | Reply

"That damn Bellringer...he makes me so damn mad!!"

-TwoothyJoe

Geez.....relax fellas.

#73 | Posted by eberly at 2022-01-12 06:07 PM | Reply

You guys talk prettier than a $20 whore.
#70 | POSTED BY EBERLY

I'll take your word for it, lonely old man.

I see "foul language" and "you guys are mad" is your chosen red herring of the evening. I hope you find someone willing to pay you attention and go back and forth about it for 200 posts, but it won't be me, loser.

#74 | Posted by JOE at 2022-01-12 06:16 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

If 1/6 had been brown muslims instead of white christians this would have been done on 1/7.

#75 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2022-01-12 06:21 PM | Reply

"That damn Bellringer...he makes me so damn mad!!"
-TwoothyJoe
Geez.....relax fellas.

#73 | POSTED BY EBERLY

You have zero to add and I will not be participating in the "keep beverly entertained marathon", so ub ignored.

#76 | Posted by truthhurts at 2022-01-12 06:21 PM | Reply

If the Biden administration solicited the letter....then this is something they wanted but didn't have justification

#59 | Posted by BellRinger

Google january 6th.

#77 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2022-01-12 06:22 PM | Reply

Geez.....relax fellas.

#73 | Posted by eberly

Post #73.

Your last post that was on the topic of the thread was post #8. The rest of them are just your usual making everything about you and calling names.

#78 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2022-01-12 06:24 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

bad move. this will be populated and taken over by white nationalists.

#79 | Posted by ichiro at 2022-01-12 09:38 PM | Reply

" Justice Department Creates Domestic Terrorism Unit"

Sweet, their own department armed with the Patriot Act. The looney left can now show their authoritarian side with pride.

#80 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2022-01-13 07:53 AM | Reply

#80 I'm sorry that the vast majority of domestic terrorist plots and attacks are committed by people who share your politics, but you're just going to have to get over it.

#81 | Posted by JOE at 2022-01-13 08:08 AM | Reply

"over 10K protests...all it takes is for a few to get out of hand."
So much "out of control" at the BLM protests where things did get a bit out of hand was provoked by the Police. If the Police treated the BLM protesters like the massively overwhelmed Capitol Police treated the Insurrectionists, things would have been different, likewise if the BLM protesters crushed the police, tazed them, beat them with poles and worse, things can you imagine what Fox News would be saying?

Anyone that watched what happened in the BLM protests and the interactions with the police can't possibly be serious in equating the total and complete abuse the Capitol Police suffered at the hands of the insurrectionists. That's just crazy.

angry parents getting loud at school board meetings, which our AG labels those people as domestic terrorists.
Most of the extreme behavior is by people that come from out of state, crossing state lines, people like the Proud Boys, to threaten and intimidate to achieve a political goal. They fall under the rubric of "domestic terrorists" to me.
www.cbs17.com

#82 | Posted by YAV at 2022-01-13 08:28 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

" Justice Department Creates Domestic Terrorism Unit"
Sweet, their own department armed with the Patriot Act. The looney left can now show their authoritarian side with pride.

#80 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS AT 2022-01-13 07:53 AM | FLAG:
(CHOOSE)

You would like to assign me to a side, wouldn't you. You sat on the sidelines while many large cities were terrorized by a leftist group (well two groups) and you got nerve to point at 1/6 as terrorists. Sniveling, insufferable twit. If it weren't for hypocrisy, you wouldn't have a platform to stand on.

#83 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2022-01-13 03:49 PM | Reply

"You would like to assign me to a side, wouldn't you."

No need.

Anyone who uses the term "looney left" has made their side known quite clearly.

"You sat on the sidelines while many large cities were terrorized by a leftist group"

You sat on the sidelines while many large cities were terrorized by right-wing police.

#84 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-01-13 03:53 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

#84

Not all the left is looney. Manchin and Sinema are both level headed people. When I saw "looney" I'm speaking of the fringe - if the shoe fits, wear it.

#85 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2022-01-13 04:02 PM | Reply

I also didn't sit on the sidelines while police abused people. My posting history here over the years proves that. Another lie by a looney.

#86 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2022-01-13 04:03 PM | Reply

Van Hollen and Steny Hoyer are often wrong but aren't unreasonable.

#87 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-01-13 04:04 PM | Reply

"I also didn't sit on the sidelines while police abused people."

Weren't you gone for like three years, presumably incarcerated?

#88 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-01-13 04:06 PM | Reply

Remind me of your hottest takes on Breonna Taylor and Eric Garner and Tamir Rice and Elijah McClain and Sandra Bland and Freddie Gray.

#89 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-01-13 04:11 PM | Reply

Weren't you gone for like three years, presumably incarcerated?

#88 | POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2022-01-13 04:06 PM

No I was gone 18 months.

I think you're thinking of Americanunity

#91 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2022-01-13 06:08 PM | Reply

Don't worry Boris the domestic unit will always be on the lookout for russian turds and chinese knaves.

#92 | Posted by Tor at 2022-01-13 06:15 PM | Reply

many large cities were terrorized by a leftist group

Citation necessary.

More conservative revisionist history.

They gotta make it up as they go along because the truth is too horrific for them to accept.

Only terror came from Reichwing agitators starting fires and blaming it on BLM and the Antifa Boogeyman.

#93 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-01-13 06:19 PM | Reply

I also didn't sit on the sidelines while police abused people.

You didn't?

Tell us of your tales, protesting police brutality.

#94 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-01-13 06:20 PM | Reply

"No I was gone 18 months."

So then you didn't say diddly about racist police in the summer of 2020.
So you can shut up now.

#95 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-01-13 06:47 PM | Reply

What did you do during those 18 months that has you drinking the Trumper Kool-Aid, or is this who you've always been?

#96 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-01-13 06:53 PM | Reply

Hm. Did he run off?

#97 | Posted by YAV at 2022-01-13 08:52 PM | Reply

If he did, don't worry. He'll be back with a new username soon enough!

#98 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-01-13 08:55 PM | Reply

All that new-name --- is just so pathetic.

#99 | Posted by YAV at 2022-01-14 09:17 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2022 World Readable

Drudge Retort