#14
You are a lying POS. I'm not sure how you wake up in the morning and face yourself in the mirror, knowing the only way you can get ahead in life is by fabricating stories about other people. You are a bonafude sociopath and need to seek help.
#15 | POSTED BY MIRANDA7
Miranda, a back-alley abortion is EXACTLY what you are advocating. You are advocating that doctors take on the responsibility for abortions when the medical and legal profession say it is or might be illegal. Therefore, doctors providing abortions are either performing an illegal or potentially illegal activity. They would have to perform the abortion outside of the legal framework. That is the definition of a back-alley abortion.
Again, using the Texas woman's story. With the fetus alive and the woman's life not in any immediate danger an abortion would be illegal. that is not even debatable. So, you advocate for an illegal abortion aka back-alley abortion.
I'm sorry you find the conclusion objectionable but that is what it is. I get it, back-alley abortion has an abominable connotation. Sometimes the issue has to be framed a certain way for it to sink in-iow truth hurts
Now I know you will respond that an abortion prior to the fetus' death would have been legal, but that simply isn't true.
As you pointed out, Texas law: "Medical emergency" means a life-threatening physical condition aggravated by, caused by, or arising from a pregnancy that, as certified by a physician, places the woman in danger of death or a serious risk of substantial impairment of a major bodily function unless an abortion is performed.
the woman's life or impairment of major bodily function was not at risk upon the initial loss of the amniotic fluid. From what I gather from the article there was a very small possibility the fetus could have survived 7 to 8 weeks for it to become viable (with severe health issues). So, again, your argument simply fails.