Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, September 21, 2022

The Department of Homeland Security's cybersecurity agency this summer turned down a multimillion-dollar proposal to protect election officials from harassment ahead of the midterm elections ...



Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.


From the cited article...

...The plan's rejection comes as some DHS and cyber officials have expressed concern about their work to stem disinformation being cast as "partisan," ...

Wait, what? No, make that, WTF!!?

One party seems to be threatening election officials and the DHS doesn't want to protect those officials because it is only one party that seems to be threatening the officials, therefore such enforcement of laws would be partisan?

I disagree with that decision.

Someone please tell me where my understanding is wrong, because my current understanding leaves me with an opinion of DHS that I am not at all comfortable with.


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2022-09-21 09:40 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

With the recent reports that DHS officials have aided and abetted the transportation of immigrants from places like Texas to Northern cities, and in fact providing them information that if they attempted to use, would make them subject to immediate deportation, it might be time to 'clean house'.


#2 | Posted by OCUser at 2022-09-22 12:38 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2022 World Readable

Drudge Retort