Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, December 27, 2022

The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed Title 42 -- a Trump-era immigration policy implemented when the pandemic broke out to quickly expel asylum-seekers at the border ...

END;

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Hold on Republicans...

I thought COVID wasn't a real threat?

And all restrictions should be lifted now?

Amazing!

#1 | Posted by Sycophant at 2022-12-27 11:11 PM | Reply

The reality is America can't absorb all the people who want to migrate here. It's logistically impossible.

Who do I blame?

Politicians who encourage people to pack up and leave their native countries.

Democrats are responsible for giving people the false idea all they had to do is get here and America would be able to care for them.

Again...it's logistically impossible to handle this.

How much more do we have to see before people understand.

Democrats don't seem to have the ability to see the big picture. Just like defund the police.

Really?

Now this.

America is really going to be in a real mess here sooner or later and likely sooner.

#2 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-27 11:56 PM | Reply

Nothing wrong with immigration but this is a chaotic mess.

#3 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-27 11:59 PM | Reply

Democrats are responsible for giving people the false idea all they had to do is get here and America would be able to care for them.

Sure, cuz no republicans hire immigrants.

*rolls eyes*

#4 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2022-12-28 12:07 AM | Reply

Alex,

This goes back decades and decades and decades.

Everyone is to blame is that's your defense.

You now good and well what I meant but can't/won't admit it.

#5 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-28 12:14 AM | Reply

it's not a defense. its true.

our economy depends on immigrants
at this point.

or we can tax rich people appropriately. but not both.

#6 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2022-12-28 12:44 AM | Reply

RE: #1 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON AT 2022-12-27 11:56 PM

"Who do I blame?
Politicians who encourage people to pack up and leave their native countries."

What political party, or better yet, who specifically repeatedly claims the south border is open? Please NAME names.

I'll wait. The question is not rhetorical.

#7 | Posted by TrueBlue at 2022-12-28 01:12 AM | Reply

"our economy depends on immigrants
at this point."

At this point started around 1640 or so.

One of the things you're supposed to be proud of, as an American whose ancestors didn't come here on a slave ship, is your ancestors made the bold decision to cross the ocean to America for a better life.

#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-28 01:32 AM | Reply

im talking about "illegal" immigrants, snoofy.

#9 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2022-12-28 01:57 AM | Reply

Agriculture definitely does depend on illegal immigrants.

But the #1 sector of the economy that depends on illegal immigrants is the Republican Fearmongering department.

#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-28 02:09 AM | Reply

Thank the Lord. There are too many people in the USA now.

#11 | Posted by wolfdog at 2022-12-28 04:35 AM | Reply

Wolf,

"Thank the Lord."

That is an interesting point.

Communist countries build walls to keep people in.

America is building walls to keep people out.

"There are too many people in the USA now."

That or too many people who aren't growing up and becoming useful adults.

Personally, I like the work and family ethic of many people from South America.

Many of them are a far cry better than the spoiled children born here.

#12 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-28 07:06 AM | Reply

Alex,

"our economy depends on immigrants at this point."

Does America have a need for immigrants right now?

There have been periods where large influxs were desired.

Why do we need immigrants right now?

#13 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-28 07:10 AM | Reply

Alex,

For what jobs?

For what industries?

#14 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-28 07:10 AM | Reply

" Who do I blame? Politicians who encourage people to pack up and leave their native countries. Democrats ... "

But not the folks who commit the crimes in the US?!?

You blame the Democrats, but not the Republican owners breaking the law by hiring them, or the Republican Sheriffs looking the other way?!? Missing the salient fact, are you???

Deport an "illegal", and you've just created a job opening. Start frog-marching hirers, going up the ladder each time, and you'l finallyl address the root of the problem.

#15 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-28 09:03 AM | Reply

"Does America have a need for immigrants right now?
There have been periods where large influxs were desired.
Why do we need immigrants right now?"

In my part of the world, they are needed for working on farms, and meat processing plants. They are also needed for driving a truck.

Construction, etc....we have needs everywhere.

#16 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-28 09:07 AM | Reply

" For what jobs? For what industries?"

Agriculture, for one. You know, the famous "jobs Americans won't do?"

Educate yourself on what actually happens:
www.al.com

#17 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-28 09:07 AM | Reply

-Who do I blame?

Everyone is to blame.

Trying to find someone specific to blame is not trying to solve the problem. It's an attempt to perpetuate the problem by being too ignorant to understand it.

#18 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-28 09:09 AM | Reply

#16
In a Midwestern town with a big beef "processing" operation you could track waves of immigration by the ingress/egress of large groups of workers at truly awful (but paying) jobs: Mexicans from the north of that country, Mexicans from the south, Central Americans, Somalis, etc., etc. There is a clear chain of migration, as people move from the worst jobs and exploitation to less horrendous employment. The jobs they take? Very few of the even most rabid MAGAts would turn their noses up at them, instantly,

#19 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2022-12-28 09:31 AM | Reply

Overcrowding is the problem. We have plenty of humans to do work, just the ones here wont do it.

So we get a bunch of people standing around taking up space, clogging up highways and destroying our environment.

Alot of the ills progressives whine about are caused by overcrowding, but they tout the mantra of letting even more poor people in.

Circular argument, insanity is what it's called.

Illegal immigration MUST stop, NOW.

#20 | Posted by boaz at 2022-12-28 09:36 AM | Reply

Boaz,

"We have plenty of humans to do work, just the ones here won't do it."

What to do about that?

#21 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-28 10:07 AM | Reply

2 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON AT 2022-12-27 11:56 PM | FLAG:

You keep spouting this nonsense and it's just not true. Firstly, 47 ------- percent of our land is completely unoccupied, and most of it is on very fertile soil. We could double our population tomorrow and still not get even close to crowded because less than 2 percent of our land is densely populated.

Secondly 10 percent of the population has an absolute stranglehold on 90 percent of the wealth. If we actually taxed their wealth properly, our infrastructure would flourish, our schools would shoot to the top... that large marginal tax rate was the one thing that actually DID make America great... and Republicans have been doing their dead level best to continue preventing that.

We have the land. We have the wealth. We have the jobs. The only thing getting in the way of a nearly utopian society is... well... Republican greed and ignorance.

#22 | Posted by VictorZiblis at 2022-12-28 10:11 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Eb,

The point isn't simply to figure out who to blame.

The point is to figure out how to address it and you have to understand the root cause and what is contributing to a problem to solve it.

The guilty parties just call it taking the blame.

#23 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-28 10:12 AM | Reply

" Trying to find someone specific to blame is not trying to solve the problem."

Not when it's Republican Sheriffs in Republican strongholds looking the other way for the benefit of the local Republican Chamber of Commerce ... the same Republicans who largely fund the Sheriffs' campaign.

For example, you mentioned the meat packing plants which are prevalent in southeast and southwest Kansas. If I remember correctly, those are Republican stron holds, correct? And the local sheriffs are aware of what's going on, right?

People keep blaming the folks looking for jobs, and totally ignore the crooks hiring them. In those areas, it is absolutely Republicans looking the other way to benefit other Republicans.

#24 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-28 10:14 AM | Reply

^strongholds

#25 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-28 10:15 AM | Reply

Vic,

"Secondly 10 percent of the population has an absolute stranglehold on 90 percent of the wealth."

That's a discussion to itself.

Right now the subject is people entering the country without documentation or being approved.

#26 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-28 10:15 AM | Reply

NW flag to soheifox at 22.

#27 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2022-12-28 10:16 AM | Reply

" Right now the subject is people entering the country without documentation or being approved."

And how do those people find and get work?

#28 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-28 10:18 AM | Reply

-For example, you mentioned the meat packing plants which are prevalent in southeast and southwest Kansas. If I remember correctly, those are Republican stron holds, correct? And the local sheriffs are aware of what's going on, right?

What do you want the local republican sheriff to do about illegal immigration?

What do you want the local republican chamber to do about illegal immigration?

#29 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-28 10:40 AM | Reply

" What do you want the local republican sheriff to do about illegal immigration?"

Their part in the in the machine.

Is it illegal to hire and employ illegals in southeast and southwestern Kansas, or not?

Pro tip: it looks really silly to pretend that these Republican sheriffs aren't aware of what these Republican owners are doing.

#30 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-28 10:43 AM | Reply

Dan,

"how do those people find and get work"

As much as that is a legitimate question, it has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

It's another topic regarding America's responsibility to the rest of the world.

Right now America's problem is people illegally entering without proper documentation and not approved.

#31 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-28 10:43 AM | Reply

" What do you want the local republican chamber to do about illegal immigration?"

It's also silly to pretend the offer of jobs isn't an incentive. If the jobs dried up, would be illegal immigration reduce?

FFS, it's the driver of the entire equation.

#32 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-28 10:45 AM | Reply

30

So, you don't know?

It sort of matters if you expect them to do something about it.

What is a local sheriff empowered to do with regards to enforcing illegal immigration?

I'm friends with a sheriff in a nearby county. I can call him and ask. But I suspect his answer is that he isn't expected to do much about it.

He answers to the taxpaying citizens of his county who pay his salary. Not a bunch of anonymous bloggers. Just sayin.....

And......the chamber reference. That cracks me up.

What do you think a chamber of commerce is legally authorized to do about illegal immigration?

Do you even know what a chamber of commerce even is?

#33 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-28 10:48 AM | Reply

"it looks really silly to pretend that these Republican sheriffs aren't aware of what these Republican owners are doing."

So you think local people own packing plants?

if you're trying to not look silly....maybe take this pro tip.....it looks really silly to pretend the chamber of commerce has any authority to do anything about illegal immigration.

#34 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-28 10:51 AM | Reply

" So you think local people own packing plants?"

I think they run them.

And are you telling me the local people aren't the folks who interview and hire?

#35 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-28 10:53 AM | Reply

" it looks really silly to pretend the chamber of commerce has any authority to do anything about illegal immigration."

They are absolutely links in the chain. The business owners, who need the workers, and who also happened to fund the sheriffs' campaigns, are absolutely part of the chain.

#36 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-28 10:55 AM | Reply

-It's also silly to pretend the offer of jobs isn't an incentive

who is pretending the offer of jobs isn't an incentive?

This exchange is just proof of my original point.

Everybody is to blame and anybody who is just looking to point fingers isn't interested in anything except a political victory. This issue serves one purpose....political fodder.

Which is fine except that it doesn't work. There are no political victories to be had with regards to illegal immigration....certainly not on a local level.

The chamber serves the large employers.....not the other way around. The chamber does not enforce rules or laws.

The chamber's only function is to attract employers to their community. Everywhere there is a packing plant, you'll find a chamber of commerce who offered up incentives and worked hard to attract that employer to locate there.

So, if your point is that republicans are fine with the current system.......you're not wrong. But you can elect all the democrats you want to serve as county sheriff or sit on the local chamber board.....they can't do jack ---- about the current system.

#37 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-28 10:56 AM | Reply

"I think they run them.
And are you telling me the local people aren't the folks who interview and hire?"

I am good friends with a retired CEO of a large meat processing business with their offices in Wichita.

I asked him how many illegals he believed he had in his employ......he said "Probably a third". That was Nationwide.

It's not a secret. It's not a local conspiracy.

#38 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-28 10:58 AM | Reply

"They are absolutely links in the chain. The business owners, who need the workers, and who also happened to fund the sheriffs' campaigns, are absolutely part of the chain."

keep pointing.....it's cute.

#39 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-28 10:59 AM | Reply

-They are absolutely links in the chain.

That's just an admission you have no clue what you want them to do.

You just want to point fingers at a problem you don't understand.

#40 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-28 11:00 AM | Reply

"The chamber serves the large employers."

Chamber members ARE the large employers.

#41 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-28 11:00 AM | Reply

" You just want to point fingers at a problem you don't understand."

Republican hirers are breaking the law. Republican sheriffs are breaking the law. Republican chambers of commerce (and by that I mean business owners) are benefiting.

You're just upset because of the unavoidable common denominator.

#42 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-28 11:03 AM | Reply

" you have no clue what you want them to do. "

Well, they certainly won't start adhering to the law without the local sheriffs forcing them.

This problem will never be solved until the root of it is addressed. One way is to actually enforce the law at place of hire.

Another is to be honest, and admit we need these meatpacking workers ... and maybe they should be put on a path of recognition.

Instead, we're all trapped inside the "computer is thinking" spin.

#43 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-28 11:12 AM | Reply

-You're just upset because of the unavoidable common denominator.

I'm not upset about any of it. Nor am in denial of what's going on.

I actually live in this situation. I grew up in it. I am extremely active in my community, including the chamber.

The political side of it is irrelevant to me, despite how gigantic it is to you.

It's that the local govt and local chamber can't do anything about it. It's too massive of an institutional problem.

If you think it's such a solvable problem, then why not expect ICE to show up and round up all these lawbreakers?

Have the Justice department start chasing local sheriffs. oh, and don't forget the law breaking chambers. Get them as well.

and then move onto the employers.

it's not like it's a secret where they work and who gave them jobs.

Have you wondered why this continues and continues and continues?

I could leave my office right now and drive you to THOUSANDS of illegals working right now.

If I know where they are, then Joe Biden knows where they are. Last I checked, ICE reports to him.

But you'd rather cry about the local sheriff and some heating and air contractor with 8 employees who sits on the chamber of commerce.

Right....you're really really really really interested in solving the problem.

LOL

#44 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-28 11:12 AM | Reply

Great! Seeing as the Democrats will find border security for other countries and not our own ... Thank God one branch of the Givernment is willing to do something about it.

#45 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2022-12-28 11:19 AM | Reply

This is just one of those issues where the electorate is just dumb dumb dumb and the powers that be take advantge of it.

We know we need immigrants at the supply we've been getting them. It's been that way for a long long time.

Politicians don't get anywhere being candidly truthful about this issue but they know the reality. We need them. Period. Legal or otherwise.

I've always believed we deliberately make the process difficult to allow for them to be legal because your average -------- voter can't handle the truth.

#46 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-28 11:59 AM | Reply

#46

I totally agree. With all of it.

Well said.

#47 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-28 12:07 PM | Reply

" oh, and don't forget the law breaking chambers."

I never said the chambers themselves broke the law, merely the employers the chambers protected were the largest contributors to the sheriffs election campaign.

Perfectly legal.

#48 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-28 12:10 PM | Reply

" It's that the local govt and local chamber can't do anything about it. It's too massive of an institutional problem."

I agree.

And the computer ball keeps spinning ... .

#49 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-28 12:11 PM | Reply

Great! Seeing as the Democrats will find border security for other countries and not our own ... Thank God one branch of the Givernment is willing to do something about it.

#45 | POSTED BY BLUEWAFFLES

Liar as usual.

#50 | Posted by Sycophant at 2022-12-28 12:36 PM | Reply

Illegal immigration will continue as long as we are a capitalist country. That's just a given Bill Johnson. Deal with it.

#51 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-28 12:38 PM | Reply

Dan,

I understand this is a complex issue.

Companies hiring them is a good starting point

However before doing that can you agree we need to stop the influx of more illegal immigrants?

#52 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-28 12:53 PM | Reply

Dan,

If you can't agree we need to stop the flow of more people, then all this talk of Republicans and employers is just a smoke screen for the fact YOU want it.

#53 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-28 01:06 PM | Reply

Most your stupid xenophobes have never met an immigrant, legal or illegal, ever in your lives.

Go spend the rest of your life in that homogenous bubble you've created for yourself and shut the fkkk up.

#54 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-28 01:11 PM | Reply

Liar as usual.
#50 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT

He's a shut in who desperately trolls for attention.

It's pathetic.

#55 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-28 01:13 PM | Reply

There is a lot to unpack here.

First, Title 42 is related to public health. If the federal (or even state) governments determine that COVID is no longer a thing, as many have done from the start, then how could Title 42 apply?

Second, there is a difference between asylum seekers and immigrants. Immigration is conducted by someone attempting to move from one place to another with the intent of establishing some sort of enduring presence. Asylum is a temporary condition where the individual is expected to return to their country of origin. Title 42 applies to both, of course, but the article seems to conflate refugee status with some sort of residency or citizenship.

Finally, not everyone seeking asylum is fleeing from a dangerous or fatal circumstance, even if they say they are. This year, 27% of asylum seekers in the UK are from Albania. Albania is one of my favorite places on the planet. I've even though about buying some property there. I wouldn't be doing that if it was an inherently dangerous place.

#56 | Posted by madbomber at 2022-12-28 01:43 PM | Reply

The court really shouldn't have a say on this - they over-stepped. Keeping Title 42 in place is good policy but it's not up to the court to make policy. This needes to be addressed by congress.

#57 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-28 01:46 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#57

Courts don't make policy. They just determine if it is legal or not.

#58 | Posted by madbomber at 2022-12-28 01:56 PM | Reply

Um, no. But thanks for playing.

#59 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2022-12-28 01:59 PM | Reply

#59

Care to Elaborate?

#60 | Posted by madbomber at 2022-12-28 02:05 PM | Reply

#58 They did that here, kept a policy in place.

Here is Gorsuch in the dissent (he says it much better than I can):

"The States contend that they face an immigration crisis at the border and policymakers have failed to agree on adequate measures to address it. The only means left to mitigate the crisis, the States suggest, is an order from this Court directing the federal government to continue its COVID-era Title 42 policies as long as possible"at the very least during the pendency of our review. Today, the Court supplies just such an order. For my part, I do not discount the States' concerns. Even the federal government acknowledges "that the end of the Title 42 orders will likely have disruptive consequences." Brief in Opposition for Federal Respondents 6. But the current border crisis is not a COVID crisis. And courts should not be in the business of perpetuating administrative edicts designed for one emergency only because elected officials have failed to address a different emergency. We are a court of law, not policymakers of last resort."

#61 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-28 02:13 PM | Reply

"Companies hiring them is a good starting point
However before doing that can you agree we need to stop the influx of more illegal immigrants?"

The food industry, including large farms, cattle feedyards, poultry, swine, etc all the way to the packing houses.....they all serve an extremely important purpose.

They literally put food on your plate. That process is not to be interrupted any more than absolutely necessary.

If hiring illegals is necessary to keep the process flowing, so be it. It's a trade off everyone with any knowledge of this issue is willing to accept. I don't give a ---- what letter is after their name.

It's a national security issue. This is my point. The average -------- can't handle the truth.

that's the truth......it's a national security issue.

#62 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-28 02:19 PM | Reply

hiring illegals is necessary to keep the process flowing,

We could start paying hundreds more for food at grocery stores.

But. In my opinion.

The only way to fix the problem, and curtail the number of people coming to America for work, is to incentivize Americans to replace illegal immigrants in the field, doing all that manual labor.

We can do so by subsidizing their wages.

Instead of wasting tax dollars on subsidies for the wealthy.

I mean. That won't ever happen.

Let's just keep fighting about it instead.

#63 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-28 02:28 PM | Reply

63

Not sure where to start with that one.

1. paying more? you think enriching Cargill, ADM, Kroger, etc. is a solution?
2. Incentivize Americans to work? So, they ARE lazy? I thought they simply didn't exist. They already have jobs. There are simply no American made workers for this work....we need them imported.
3. subsidize their wages? Who's wages? How much do you want a packing plant worker, who isn't Hispanic, to make? You see the issue there? You want to pay a white worker more than a brown worker. Or at least you're suggesting it's worth more.

#64 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-28 02:35 PM | Reply

"The food industry, including large farms, cattle feedyards, poultry, swine, etc all the way to the packing houses.....they all serve an extremely important purpose.
They literally put food on your plate."

^
That's not their purpose.
That's their function.
Their purpose is to get rich.

Clownshack is right. The business model can't sustain a living wage -- or even the Federal minimum wage!

Whose brilliant business idea was that?
Not the illegal immigrants.

#65 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-28 02:38 PM | Reply

Question for everyone.....I keep seeing the word "criminals" and "crisis" over and over and crimes being committed

What is the big crime of an undocumented worker coming into this country and taking a job? They aren't leeching off anyone. They are working for their wages with limited eligibility of benefits that normally come with those jobs but since they are an illegal...they dare not file for such benefits. just do the work for the money and do whatever they want it it.

We're assuming the conditions and wages are up and up. No taking advantage of the workers and no other crimes are being committed. Sex traffic, drugs, etc...a legitimate job with legitimate wages working alongside legal folks being paid and treated similar.

Who really gives a ----?

Do you all realize that by having them here doing the work they do, we are in many ways averting a crisis?

#66 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-28 02:40 PM | Reply

"You see the issue there? You want to pay a white worker more than a brown worker. Or at least you're suggesting it's worth more."

We see the issue all right. It's just like I said, which is just like you said:

The business model can't pay American wages.

So it doesn't.

Enjoy your turnips.

#67 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-28 02:42 PM | Reply

Eberly,

I'd point you to 2019. Illegal immigration numbers were way down yet the economy was red hot. A couple of decades ago it was mostly working age hispanic men coming in for work. Now it's whole families and a lot of children being exploited and are taking advantage of claiming asylum as a means to stay if they are apprehended by border patrol.

#68 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-28 02:49 PM | Reply

"whole families and a lot of children being exploited and are taking advantage of claiming asylum"

So they're being exploited, while also taking advantage... Look how ------- retarded you are.

Eberly, Republicans aren't capable of having a meaningful discussion on this topic. Their heads are all up Trump's ass.

#69 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-28 02:53 PM | Reply

"Now it's whole families and a lot of children being exploited..."

Are you saying we are exploiting them?

The relatively few that ended up for a long weekend in Marthas Vineyard aside.......

#70 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-28 03:03 PM | Reply

#70 They are being exploited by human and sex traffickers.

#71 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-28 03:32 PM | Reply

#71 Is it our job to protect everyone?

#72 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-28 03:35 PM | Reply

Jeff is a xenophobic intellectually dishonest partisan hack job. Nothing more.

#73 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-28 03:44 PM | Reply

True xenophobes want as much human and sex trafficking as possible. People like Laura Mohr, for example.

#74 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-28 04:04 PM | Reply

True xenophobes want as much human and sex trafficking as possible. People like Laura Mohr, for example.

#74 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Yeah, come back and repeat this when Gaetz is kicked from your party, you lying ------- hack

#75 | Posted by truthhurts at 2022-12-28 04:09 PM | Reply

True xenophobes want as much human and sex trafficking as possible. People like Laura Mohr, for example.

POSTED BY BELLRINGER AT 2022-12-28 04:04 PM | REPLY

Considering this is a capitalist country. We all exploit them when we buy goods and services at the lowest price point. That's what happens in a capitalist country.

#76 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-28 04:15 PM | Reply

Until congress addresses this issue of what qualifies for legal migration, how to deal with the masses at the border, none of this is going away. The migrants are coming because their living standards, their very lives in some cases are dependent on them finding somewhere to go besides where they lived.

I have no issue with migrants finding jobs. Mostly they will work the jobs the public here doesn't want and won't do. At present there is a sort of underground railway of help for those coming in, not official. How does an illegal get a job where it requires the paperwork they don't have? There are counterfeiters, well known among those here legally and illegally that will for a sum prepare those papers. They won't pass an official close inspection but if they are not looked at too closely, they look right. As long as the papers are not run through the system checks, all looks good.

How do those survive much less save money from jobs so low paying we won't do them? The ones coming in are used to worse living conditions in some cases. Someone rents a home, 20 people might live there, each contributing a small amount to the total needed to support the place. You do what you have to do and they are when it comes to making it work. Understand I have respect for the workers. They have a work ethic that much here in the US no longer have. They will often go the extra mile just to see it done right.

With all the above, you'd think I'd really support all these coming from no where and flooding the borders. Since I live down here, close enough to be effected by it, I don't. Let them come through legally, make them a path legally (hello congress, do your job for a change), and provide what is needed to deal with this mass migration, one way or another.

#77 | Posted by BBQ at 2022-12-28 04:46 PM | Reply

make them a path legally

Showing up at the border seeking asylum is doing it legally. Under U.S. and international law.

I asked this contractor who had a Trump bumper sticker and was building a house around the corner why he was using obviously undocumented workers (none spoke English, among other tells). His answer: "my subs (subcontractors) hired them." As if he didn't know. Suuuuuure he didn't. Same story on construction sites across America.

Betcha MAO's rancher daddy has hired his share too ... Ya know?

#78 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2022-12-28 04:55 PM | Reply

"Showing up at the border seeking asylum is doing it legally. Under U.S. and international law."

Through legal points of entry.

#79 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-28 05:02 PM | Reply

"Through legal points of entry."

Like El Paso?

#80 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-28 05:12 PM | Reply

BTW, more people gain entry into the U.S. at airports than the southern border.

Year after year, the majority of the undocumented in the U.S. aren't from south of the border. They're Irish, English, Asian, South Asians, etc who've overstayed their visas.

#81 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2022-12-28 05:59 PM | Reply

"Through legal points of entry."

Like El Paso?

#80 | Posted by Danforth

Yessir.

#82 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2022-12-28 06:00 PM | Reply

Legal check points. As a US citizen of I fly to another country when I come back I still have to go through customs even though I'm a citizen.

#83 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-28 07:50 PM | Reply

paying more? you think enriching Cargill, ADM, Kroger, etc. is a solution?

The subsidies would be going directly to the employees.

Incentivize Americans to work?

No American is going to work these jobs for what illegal immigrants are getting paid. Not because they're lazy or whatever else you were implying. Because no one should be working for that little. (Including illegal immigrant)

subsidize their wages? Whose wages? How much do you want a packing plant worker, who isn't Hispanic, to make? You see the issue there?

I see no problem paying employees living wages for their labor. Regardless of their race.

#84 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 04:06 AM | Reply

BellRinger is a xenophobic mouthpiece for the Trumpublican party.

Showering Trump with praise regardless of how much propaganda or how many lies he has to post.

He's one of the biggest Trump sycophant on the DR.

Meanwhile.

"Comparison of the Obama, Trump, and Biden Administration Immigration Enforcement Priorities"

leitf.org

As with everything else during the Trump administration, it was nothing more than smoke and mirrors.

#85 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 04:22 AM | Reply

Year after year, the majority of the undocumented in the U.S. aren't from south of the border. They're Irish, English, Asian, South Asians, etc who've overstayed their visas.
#81 | POSTED BY AMERICANUNITY

Don't waste your time.

It has been explained to BellRinger several times how the majority of illegal immigrants are people overstaying their visas, not those crossing the border.

Citations have been provided from different sources.

He doesn't care about the facts. Xenophobes rarely do.

#86 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 04:29 AM | Reply

As a US citizen of I fly to another country when I come back I still have to go through customs even though I'm a citizen.
#83 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

And?

You think asylum seekers coming to El Paso are simply waved across the border, unsearched, unexamined, without question?

It's impossible to tell what you imagine, from your couch, in Michigan.

You're ignorant about the subject. Yet you can't seem to shut up about it. The Republicans have really screwed you up.

I doubt you know anyone who isn't white. You definitely haven't ever seen an illegal immigrant in your life.

#87 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 04:38 AM | Reply

True xenophobes want as much human and sex trafficking as possible. People like Laura Mohr, for example.
#74 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

"True xenophobes"? Shut up, stupid.

Xenophobes are people living in Michigan, who are worried about the manufactured "crisis at the southern border."

People who believe illegal immigrants are criminals, rapists, or sex traffickers.

People who cheer on the abuse of asylum seeking immigrants by politicians, sending them to locations unable to care for them.

People who ignore illegal immigrants overstaying their visas and overemphasize people coming from south of the border.

People who want to wall off America.

Like you.

#88 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 04:51 AM | Reply

paying more? you think enriching Cargill, ADM, Kroger, etc. is a solution?

The subsidies would be going directly to the employees.

Eb, error in my response to your #1 question.

Yes. Without cheap labor - illegal immigrant laborers - the cost of of the produce and groceries we buy would go skyrocketing.

And yes. I agree. That isn't a solution.

So what can be done?

Socialism.

Farmers, ranchers, factories still pay their employees the same wages.

Tax dollars provide the rest.

Increasing wages to the point where they attract Americans to fill them.

Pay people.

That's how we end illegal immigration from south of the border. By filling the jobs they're coming for.

By the way. No one in America will do those jobs for the current wages.

Never.

#89 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 05:02 AM | Reply

"Not because they're lazy or whatever else you were implying."

That's pretty much exactly what it is. When you can get an acceptable amount of cash and benefits from the federal government, while retaining 100% of your time for your own use, why not do it?

You're also doing the progressive thing and ignoring economics. When I lived in Louisiana, all of the gardeners hired by the HOA where Hispanic. Why? because they were able to come in and mow lawns at a rate the residents were willing to pay, which was about $60/month.

Had it been $200 a month, I would have just mowed the lawn myself. Or found somewhere else to live, as at $200 a month I would rather keep my money and give up some time.

#90 | Posted by madbomber at 2022-12-29 08:15 AM | Reply

The underlying point as illustrated by Eberly is that migrant labor is necessary. That's as true in the US as it is in any western nation.

Instead of figuring out how to make them into USans, which is an extremely lengthy process, The US should be figuring how to safely and legally get them into a job, if a job is what they want.

#91 | Posted by madbomber at 2022-12-29 08:17 AM | Reply

#89

Dude, for once I agree with you 100%. I've said the same thing on several occasions. Other than the socialism thing. There is no part in here where the workers own or control the means of production. Nor is there any part of your suggestion that's not fully made possible by capitalism. It would have to be done at the state-level though. If the intent is for an individual to acquire a livable income, that number is going to change based on region. Probably by city.

The other thing I would push would be scrapping welfare benefits for most recipients and making the government being an employer of last resort, modeled on the pay scale employed by the US Military.

#92 | Posted by madbomber at 2022-12-29 08:24 AM | Reply

-Increasing wages to the point where they attract Americans to fill them.

You can't achieve that. We stopped living in a world where we can create a job for just an "American" about 50 years ago.

You increase the wages, you also increase the incentive for illegals to come. Illegals who will work their butts off for less money.

There is no getting around it. You're suggesting we increase the incentive for EVERYONE to want that job.

Your suggestion mathematically can't be achieved.

It's the same thing as suggesting that you can just add points to everyone's test score so that nobody performs below average.

And what's the point anyway? The goal is for a white guy to make more money that he's worth for a job that an employer can fill with someone else?

It's not going to happen.

I'll tell you all what's going to happen.....ready??????

This is what's going to happen.......The exact same thing that's been happening. The same employers are going to employ the same people documented or not and your government, Federal, State, and local (and even the local republican sheriff and republican chamber of commerce LOL) will look the other way.

the only thing our govt will do is hopefully do a better job of cracking down on horrendous working conditions in plants who mostly employ people who won't turn them in.

#93 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-29 09:10 AM | Reply

-Increasing wages to the point where they attract Americans to fill them.

Immigration on the border has nothing to do with this.

#94 | Posted by oneironaut at 2022-12-29 09:18 AM | Reply

The most common example I see every day of employers using immigrant labor is the Guest worker program...the H-2A program for ag workers.

Mostly, these workers come from South Africa. They get a US drivers license and have a visa that last about 9 months. The employer has to comply with the Federal regulations and rules that govern the program and I support them with all the insurance they need to comply. They have to pay them a pretty decent wage and provide housing. Housing that's inspected twice a year so it can't just be a complete dump.

When you add up the total cost per hour for these jobs.....these farmers would gladly hire a local person and be in a position to offer them a very good wage. I'm talking $30+ an hour to operate machinery and drive a truck. Feed and tend cattle as well. Not highly skilled, not that dangerous either. And I'm talking rural Kansas. $60K to $70K is not too bad.

And yet they are doing this anyway. Wonder why? Those people don't exist. We need these workers from somewhere else. The supply is simply too low.

#95 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-29 09:18 AM | Reply

One of the problems I see with posters on this board who fall into this trap of arguing about illegal immigration is that they view all immigrant labor as "cheap labor.

I see my clients paying high wages for ANY labor that is quality. There is a marketplace for quality labor. illegal or otherwise. You all accept employers are not being pursued for hiring them and they need the labor so badly, they'll pay.

IOW, there are multiple employers competing for the illegal worker. Not because they are cheap but because they are good. And they aren't good because they are illegal. They are good because they are good. Not all illegals are quality labor. Some are probably just as lazy as what we grow here at home.

#96 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-29 09:24 AM | Reply

Eb,

You sound like you have your finger on the pulse of this issue.

If you were in power and could change 3 things what would they be going forward in priority order.

Forget the past...going forward.

I'd actually like to know.

Just brief answers in summary if you can.

#97 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-29 10:11 AM | Reply

Eb,

You sound as if you comprehend the problem.

I always see lots of problem pointer-outers.

But not much in the way of practical solutions seperate from politics or agendas.

#98 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-29 10:19 AM | Reply

"You can't achieve that. We stopped living in a world where we can create a job for just an "American" about 50 years ago."

You can't create a job, but you can control how much money a worker takes home.

Progressives often take the position that businesses should be obligated to pay a living wage. That ignores what I see as the obvious economic truth, which is that for some people, the value of their labor is less than what would translate into a "living wage." It is therefore not an economic policy, problem, but a social policy problem. If the taxpayers think that everyone should be entitled to $N/X, then it should be the taxpayers who make up the difference between what an individual's labor value can draw from the labor markets, and what society thinks an individual is entitled to take home.

And under this construct, there would be no (or far less) incentive for migrants to turn north because A) they would not be entitled to government work stipends, and B) there would be less work available. Especially if you scrapped welfare benefits for working age adults.

#99 | Posted by madbomber at 2022-12-29 12:45 PM | Reply

"for some people, the value of their labor is less than what would translate into a "living wage."

^
Got any examples?

#100 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-29 12:46 PM | Reply

"If you were in power and could change 3 things what would they be going forward in priority order.
Forget the past...going forward."

1. Acknowledge the facts and reality with regards to how we need these folks especially for the work they perform. Also admit what was pointed out upthread that it's overstayed visas, not illegal crossings, and recognize the facts with regards to criminal behavior, etc.....and reduce people's fears about immigrants. It's mostly all hyped up fear....politics 101.

2. Simplify the process to admit folks at the border. Enable these people to be legal easier and let them get jobs, apply for a drivers license, enroll in employee benefit programs, file a tax return, live out in the open.

3. Laugh at people who continue to freak out over illegal immigration.

#101 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-29 12:49 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"That's how we end illegal immigration from south of the border."

Some of that may be true but without helping to solve the myriad problems south of the border I believe that illegal immigration will never end.

Why is there little to no illegal immigration on our northern borders?

Because up north they are not desperate to escape the cartels and violence and economic misery.

#102 | Posted by donnerboy at 2022-12-29 12:59 PM | Reply

#101

Once again, Eb, I agree with everything you posted. Although be aware: #3 is impossible until #1 and #2 are achieved.

#103 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-29 01:01 PM | Reply

#101 | Posted by eberly

Excellent post.

A segment of American society has always cast aspersions on immigrants. The Italians, Irish, Poles,.... one group after another have been the subject of scorn until they were assimilated within a couple of generations.

The crime rate among illegal immigrants is half that of natural born Americans.

#104 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2022-12-29 01:03 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

There are only two things I can't stand in this world: People who are intolerant of other people's cultures...

...and the Dutch!

#105 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-29 01:07 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

There are only two things I can't stand in this world: People who are intolerant of other people's cultures...

...and the Dutch!

#105 | Posted by Danforth

I heard an English commentator say something close to that before their World Cup match LOL

#106 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2022-12-29 01:27 PM | Reply

^Direct steal from Austin Powers.

#107 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-29 01:29 PM | Reply

Because up north they are not desperate to escape the cartels and violence and economic misery.

#102 | Posted by donnerboy

Many of those seeking entry into the U.S. are subsistence farmers from Central America, where drought followed by torrential rain has devastated crops.

From the World Food Program:

Prolonged dry spells and excessive rains have devastated corn and bean crops in the Dry Corridor of Central America, leaving farmers and their families prone to hunger and malnutrition. Children are especially vulnerable.

www.wfpusa.org

#108 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2022-12-29 01:31 PM | Reply

Direct steal from Austin Powers.

#107 | Posted by Danforth

LOL! My wife's heard me do my Fat Bastard impression more than once when I'm pulling a pizza out of the oven.

"Get in my belly!"

#109 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2022-12-29 01:38 PM | Reply

Eb,

We gonna go through this together.

We stopped living in a world where we can create a job for just an "American" about 50 years ago.
You increase the wages, you also increase the incentive for illegals to come. Illegals who will work their butts off for less money.
There is no getting around it. You're suggesting we increase the incentive for EVERYONE to want that job.

This back and forth is very confusing.

If we pay enough money to incentivize EVERYONE to want the job, Americans won't want the job, and illegal immigrants will continue to take them?

If we pay enough for EVERYONE to want the jobs, why wouldn't Americans want them?

Your suggestion mathematically can't be achieved.

Definitely not while the wealthy, who already benefit from the current situation and who are the recipients of our tax dollars through subsidies, still control the government.

But there is enough money in our federal government to subsidize wages for employees.

It's not impossible as you so casually implied.

And what's the point anyway? The goal is for a white guy to make more money that he's worth for a job that an employer can fill with someone else?

The point is, illegal immigrants are getting underpaid for their labor.

The point is, when you subsidize wages poor Americans would gladly take those jobs. (Poor Americans are Black, Brown and White.)

The point is to curtail illegal immigration.

You know, that thing BellRinger, Gracie and other Trumpers are sure is the biggest threat facing our nation.

Because the Republican Party has told them to be afraid.

I'll tell you all what's going to happen.....ready?
#93 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Scroll up. I already implied the wealthy wouldn't let this happen. (#63)

I completely agree with the last two paragraphs.

Illegal immigration is a part of America. Because wealthy people love their cheap labor and their government subsidies.

#110 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 02:06 PM | Reply

"Got any examples?"

Sure. Lots.

Provide a dollar amount for a living wage. Anyone who is currently making less than that is an example of someone whose labor value is less than a living wage.

#111 | Posted by madbomber at 2022-12-29 02:08 PM | Reply

I always see lots of problem pointer-outers.

They tend to be your republican ilk.

Xenophobes freaking out over something which will never adversely effect them, and from which they depend on for cheap produce and services.

But not much in the way of practical solutions seperate from politics or agendas.
#98 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Oh man, what you consider a "practical solution" I can't fathom.

You were one of the morons who cheered on building a wall and separating families.

Your solutions are impractical and cruel.

#112 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 02:16 PM | Reply

"Your solutions are impractical and cruel."

That's a tenet of his faith.

#113 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2022-12-29 02:23 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

these workers come from South Africa. They get a US drivers license and have a visa that last about 9 months.

So, not illegal immigrants.

these farmers would gladly hire a local person and be in a position to offer them a very good wage. I'm talking $30+ an hour to operate machinery and drive a truck. Feed and tend cattle as well. Not highly skilled, not that dangerous either. And I'm talking rural Kansas. $60K to $70K is not too bad.

Throw in an extra $30 an hour, subsidizes by the government.

You'll get local people applying.

Or pay them $25 less an hour and hire a bus full of illegal immigrants.

#114 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 02:27 PM | Reply

And this is why you never vote for the green party.

#115 | Posted by Tor at 2022-12-29 02:28 PM | Reply

Provide a dollar amount for a living wage. Anyone who is currently making less than that is an example of someone whose labor value is less than a living wage.
#111 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

So who is on the hook to cover the cost of living for thess workers?

It seems like it would not be possible to conduct business without any living employees.

#116 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-29 02:36 PM | Reply

Eb,

So you believe the will of the people if enough people do something should supercede our law makers?

#117 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-29 02:41 PM | Reply

Money talks and BS walks Bill Johnson. Deal with it.

#118 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-29 02:43 PM | Reply

President Hillary Clinton should be in her second term.

#119 | Posted by Tor at 2022-12-29 03:33 PM | Reply

President Hillary Clinton should be in her second term.

POSTED BY TOR AT 2022-12-29 03:33 PM | REPLY

Want some cheese to go with that whine of your's??

#120 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-29 03:44 PM | Reply

Eb,

Your first 2 points were thought out.

If this was for a grade I wouldn't accept your work and make you redo the 3rd one.

#121 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-29 03:48 PM | Reply

You read that Eb?

You've crossed the line with #101 and BillJohnson won't have anything to do with it. Neither will BellRinger.

I'm sure you're crushed to read that.

Our resident homophobe disagrees with you.

#122 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 03:52 PM | Reply

Your first 2 points were thought out.
If this was for a grade I wouldn't accept your work and make you redo the 3rd one.

POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON AT 2022-12-29 03:48 PM | REPLY

You speaketh with forked tongue.

#123 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-29 03:54 PM | Reply

Hillary Clinton should be in her second term.
#119 | POSTED BY TOR

She couldn't even win her first term.

Overconfidence was her downfall.

#124 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 03:59 PM | Reply

She couldn't even win her first term.
Overconfidence was her downfall.

POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK AT 2022-12-29 03:59 PM | REPLY

She was arrogant to a fault. She felt she was entitled to the presidency.

#125 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-29 04:03 PM | Reply

With the key word being her sense of "entitlement". Such a turn off to regular voters.

#126 | Posted by moder8 at 2022-12-29 04:12 PM | Reply

Yeah it turned of a net minus seven million voters compared to Trump.

#127 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-29 04:13 PM | Reply

#120 | Posted by LauraMohr

STFU. Moron opinions like yours gave us Trump.

#128 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2022-12-29 04:14 PM | Reply

ST--. Moron opinions like yours gave us Trump.

POSTED BY AMERICANUNITY AT 2022-12-29 04:14 PM | REPLY

GFY AU. She did herself no favours when she had this entitled arrogance about her. Let us not forget people in the rust belt feeling ignored by the Clintons. That's why they voted for Trump. Yes he was a con artist. They voted for him as a big -- to the establishment. Deal with it AU.

#129 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-29 04:20 PM | Reply

www.theatlantic.com

"The Rustbelt States Hillary Clinton Neglected Led to Her Defeat - The Atlantic" www.theatlantic.com

#130 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-29 04:25 PM | Reply

"Let us not forget people in the rust belt feeling ignored by the Clintons."

Obama was right about them. They cling to their guns and their religion. They are stupid, though the ones who are less stupid understand that about themsevls now, after voting for Trump.

#131 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-29 04:25 PM | Reply

How many morons felt they could surely vote green and nothing bad would happen and if it did well that would show America?

#132 | Posted by Tor at 2022-12-29 04:28 PM | Reply

How many morons felt they could surely vote green and nothing bad would happen and if it did well that would show America?

POSTED BY TOR AT 2022-12-29 04:28 PM | REPLY

Like her or hate her. Jill Stein was the only candidate that supported the people at Standing Rock in their fight against Dakota Access pipeline. Neither Hillary nor Trump did that. That spoke volumes to me.

#133 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-29 04:37 PM | Reply

...in their fight against Dakota Access pipeline.

Effective too... it's moving 750,000 barrels per day now.

#134 | Posted by REDIAL at 2022-12-29 04:48 PM | Reply

How many morons felt they could surely vote green and nothing bad would happen and if it did well that would show America?
#132 | POSTED BY TOR

Most people who voted green had zero effect on the outcome of the election.

It's sad you'd blame people for exercising their right to vote.

Instead of realizing Republicans were better at exploiting Hillary's weaknesses and overconfidence.

#135 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 05:03 PM | Reply

it's moving 750,000 barrels per day now.

And some of it is actually making it to its destination.

#136 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 05:07 PM | Reply

That spoke volumes to me.
#133 | POSTED BY LAURAMOHR

^
Putin funded Jill Stein's campaign.
That should speak bigger volumes.
You didn't know ot at the time, but in hindsight, Putin used Standing Rock to get to your emotions.

#137 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-29 05:10 PM | Reply

When your entitled and privilage ladend votes kill people you deserve to catch crap.

#138 | Posted by Tor at 2022-12-29 05:19 PM | Reply

When your entitled and privilage ladend votes kill people you deserve to catch crap.

POSTED BY TOR AT 2022-12-29 05:19 PM | REPLY

Kiss my hiney.

#139 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-29 05:24 PM | Reply

They voted for him as a big -- to the establishment. Deal with it AU.

#129 | POSTED BY LAURAMOHR

Gee Thanks.

And now we are all still dealing with it. And we will be until he merci--lly goes to magamaroon heaven, apparently.

#140 | Posted by donnerboy at 2022-12-29 05:34 PM | Reply

Putin funded Jill Stein's campaign.
That should speak bigger volumes.
You didn't know ot at the time, but in hindsight, Putin used Standing Rock to get to your emotions.
POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2022-12-29 05:10 PM | REPLY

More sour grapes from the Hillary contingent.

#141 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-29 05:38 PM | Reply

Tell us about how wonderful you feel knowing that the current Supreme Court will lock you in a cage if it gets a chance.

#142 | Posted by Tor at 2022-12-29 06:09 PM | Reply

Tell us about how wonderful you feel knowing that the current Supreme Court will lock you in a cage if it gets a chance.

POSTED BY TOR AT 2022-12-29 06:09 PM | REPLY

Thank God. Then I won't have to read your whiny trope.

#143 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-29 06:11 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Do they even allow you to set foot within 200 ft of a school at this point?

Yes I'm serious I'm surprised if they do that in Kansas.

The Kansas legislature won't hesitate to make things worse for you and the Supreme Court won't stop them.

#144 | Posted by Tor at 2022-12-29 06:17 PM | Reply

Tor,

Shut up.

#145 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 06:23 PM | Reply

Tor is so boring I swear. Instead of understanding why Hillary lost he lashes out.

#146 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-29 06:57 PM | Reply

More sour grapes from the Hillary contingent.
#141 | POSTED BY LAURAMOHR

LOL no.
Why would my grapes be any sourer than yours?

Metaphorically speaking, I mean!

#147 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-29 07:04 PM | Reply

Laura,

Do you think Bernie would have beat Trump?

#148 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-29 07:47 PM | Reply

Laura,
Do you think Bernie would have beat Trump?

#148 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON AT 2022-12-29 07:47 PM | REPLY

I guess I'm not on your do not talk to list. Yes I do Bill Johnson. He spoke for the working class not the corporate class like Hillary.

#149 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-29 08:07 PM | Reply

Do you think Bernie would have beat Trump?
#148 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

I think he would have beaten Trump, but then again I also thought Hillary Clinton would have beaten Trump.
Eight years of a Black President, then a Woman?
Eight years of a Black President, then a Socialist?

Tough call, but I think Republicans hate women more than socialist men. But not necessarily enough of a different that Bernie would have won.

#150 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-29 08:19 PM | Reply

I think Biden would have won in 2016. Probably his best shot at winning.

#151 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-29 08:19 PM | Reply

I think Biden would have won in 2016. Probably his best shot at winning.

POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2022-12-29 08:19 PM | REPLY

This!!!!!! I agree.

#152 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-29 08:22 PM | Reply

Laura,

"I guess I'm not on your do not talk to list."

Just be civil.

#153 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-29 09:02 PM | Reply

Snoofy,

"They cling to their guns and their religion."

I'd be curious what people in the Ukraine think about their guns and religion.

It's a mostly Christian country and frankly the men there are not like the wimps here.

In the event something every did happen in the US similar to the Ukraine, you'd be crying to the men with their guns and their religion to save your sorry butt.

#154 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2022-12-29 09:12 PM | Reply

#154 And you wouldn't? Whats your point?

But I don't think the Bitter Clingers would put up much of a fight without HIMARS etc so your comment is kinda dumb too.

#155 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-29 09:14 PM | Reply

@#154 ... "They cling to their guns and their religion."

I'd be curious what people in the Ukraine think about their guns and religion. ...

And your point is?

Really, what is your point with that comment?

#156 | Posted by LampLighter at 2022-12-29 10:12 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"So who is on the hook to cover the cost of living for thess workers?"

So, the concept of a "living wage" is a little misleading. What it should be called is a standard of living wage.

But in reality, it costs very little to keep oneself alive. In reality, it can cost nothing.

But since the living wage is a social concept, it is society that foots the bill.

#157 | Posted by madbomber at 2022-12-30 04:46 AM | Reply

"Like her or hate her. Jill Stein was the only candidate that supported the people at Standing Rock in their fight against Dakota Access pipeline."

Didn't Putin fund that as well? I seem to recall them being close.

In any case, Standing Rock was nothing but pure, unadulterated theater. If you're an environmentalist, it's the pipeline you want. The oil is going to get from A to B somehow, either through a pipe, or on trains and trucks. Guess which option produces more pollution and requires more fossil fuels?

Maybe the natives really did care. Who knows. I suspect someone was holding out for more money.

#158 | Posted by madbomber at 2022-12-30 04:51 AM | Reply

"Do you think Bernie would have beat Trump?"

10% of Bernie voters eventually broke for Trump.

Bernie would not have won. The chattering left likes to believe, but for billionaires and corporations, society would place the needs and wants of the "working class" above their own.

That concept of a "working class" still appears to be how originally envisioned by Karl Marx. But it's just a concept. It's not a real thing. At least not when it comes to class consciousness.

#159 | Posted by madbomber at 2022-12-30 05:09 AM | Reply

-Once again, Eb, I agree with everything you posted. Although be aware: #3 is impossible until #1 and #2 are achieved.

I really just threw in #3 because Bill asked for 3.

"The point is, illegal immigrants are getting underpaid for their labor.
The point is, when you subsidize wages poor Americans would gladly take those jobs. (Poor Americans are Black, Brown and White.)"

Not sure what you mean. If we make the illegal a legal worker....do you think that increases their wages? Not sure that will happen. Why would it happen? Why would an employer pay more for a legal when there is apparently zero consequence for employing the illegal?

Perhaps the wage the illegal makes is insignificant from their legal co-workers performing the same job.

And again...wages for what job? You want to select a group of people, decide they are entitled to earn more and then subsidize their wage regardless of where they work?

And many poor Americans already work in a job. Now what happens to that job? Maybe you just subsidize the job the poor person currently works at rather than encourage them to move to another job to get a subsidized wage.

Have you remotely thought this through? Even if there was a chance in hell politically of this happening......it simply wouldn't work.

The economics of it wouldn't permit it.

I know you think it's all just rich people who stand in the way of your well thought out utopia......but actual economics matter. Especially in this case.

You're trying to pick winners and losers. Certain specific people and certain specific jobs.....right? What if a job is occupied by a non minority or a non poor person. Are they entitled to a higher wage just like the brown person or the poor person?

Do you think the actual employer might want to weigh on what the job should pay. They are the people who sign the checks and make the decision to hire and fire, set their prices, etc...basically determine the value of a job. Their biggest challenge is finding good people, paying them enough to come to work, and figuring out how to keep them.

You seem to believe that you can throw money at a worthless lazy worker and they'll stop being worthless and lazy.

It

does

not

work

that

way

I

don't

think

you

understand

that

#160 | Posted by eberly at 2022-12-30 12:34 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2023 World Readable

Drudge Retort