Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, December 29, 2022

While historically, FBI criticism has come from the left, today conservatives who are upset about the FBI questions into Trump, are attacking the bureau. The New York Times writes about decorated FBI agent George Piro who was stunned to find out his former colleagues were taking aim at him.

END;

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

The Jan. 6 special committee has withdrawn its subpoena of former President Donald Trump.

New Congress, moot subpoena. That's the way it works.

#2 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2022-12-29 10:43 AM | Reply

#1

Another aptly named sock-puppet.

#3 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2022-12-29 10:52 AM | Reply

Gotta love how NYT rushes to the defense of the FBI even after what Twitter Files has exposed along with the Horowitz IG report. That rag really has turned into Pravda. It's quite sad.

#4 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-29 10:57 AM | Reply

What's sad is what a pathetic ballwasher you are for a Fat, Disgraced Loser. That's "SAD!"

#5 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2022-12-29 11:11 AM | Reply

" even after what Twitter Files has exposed"

What a nothingburger.

All TTF exposed was a once-bitten, twice shy editorial division struggling with what clearly looked like election disinformation.

It's peak Republican to pretend the Biden Administration demanded censorship ... fully ignoring a) there WAS NO Biden Administration at that point; b) the Biden campaign made no demands, requests only; c) the Trump Administration (which DID exist) was the only government entity capable of government censorship; and d) the request(s) were that Twitter follow its own terms of service.

STOP THE PRESSES!

#6 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-29 11:15 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Gotta love how NYT rushes to the defense of the FBI even after what Twitter Files has exposed along with the Horowitz IG report. That rag really has turned into Pravda. It's quite sad.

#4 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

The Twitter Files have "exposed" nothing. The FBI gave information to Twitter. Twitter decided how to use it. The FBI made suggestions about what to act on and how to act, but Twitter was not required to do so. And Twitter did not take action against every account that the FBI reported.

I know you are in the party of "no", that you snowflakes just whine and complain about things without actually offering solutions (Obamacare?, inflation?) but I will give you the opportunity anyways. You claim that the FBI interactions with Twitter were somehow inappropriate. So, please tell me what interactions WOULD be appropriate. Should the FBI be prohibited from passing ANY information on to Twitter (or ANY private company)? If you had any sort of intellectual consistency I would be able to assume that is what you are advocating for based on your post (though, as a conservative, I know you are probably just whining while simultaneously refusing to take any sort of concrete position). If you are NOT advocating for the FBI to be prohibited from communicating with private sector companies, then please elucidate us as to what constraints you DO think the FBI should operate under and why you think those are appropriate.

#7 | Posted by gtbritishskull at 2022-12-29 11:16 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

#4 - LMAO!
What a maroon!

#8 | Posted by YAV at 2022-12-29 11:16 AM | Reply

#6 Danforth - You clearly haven't even perused the reporting. But you sure as heck watched every last second of the J6 show trials with zero cross examination of any witness. But I digress.

#9 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-29 11:26 AM | Reply

I remember a time when the left was wary of powerful government agencies like the FBI and CIA. Now, the left acts as their mouthpieces.

#10 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-29 11:27 AM | Reply

"#5 | POSTED BY LEGALLYYOURDEAD"

I honestly don't think I've ever seen you post a comment of any value. It's remarkable, when you really think about it. Your contribution to discussion on this site is below zero.

You are a complete loser.

#11 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-29 11:30 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Gotta love how NYT rushes to the defense of the FBI"

Gotta love how you maga maroons believe in such BS and nonsense and then happily regurgitate them as "facts".

Enjoy your "investigations into the investigators" again. How did that work out for you maroons last time?

Oh and don't bother with any of them silly Congressional subpoenas.

Those mean absolutely nothing now. Thanks to Trumpy's republicans.


#12 | Posted by donnerboy at 2022-12-29 11:31 AM | Reply

honestly don't think I've ever seen you post a comment of any value. It's remarkable, when you really think about it. Your contribution to discussion on this site is below zero.
You are a complete loser.

POSTED BY BELLRINGER AT 2022-12-29 11:30 AM | REPLY

Says the guy who said the Durham investigation would finally nail Obama . Puhlease.

#13 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-29 11:36 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

"Oh and don't bother with any of them silly Congressional subpoenas.
Those mean absolutely nothing now. Thanks to Trumpy's republicans.

#12 | POSTED BY DONNERBOY AT 2022-12-29 11:31 AM | REPLY |"

You are probably correct because the Biden DOJ is extremely politicized and would never prosecute a contempt of congress charge on any of it's perceived allies. However, if it's a foe who defies a congressional subpoena, this happens:

"Stephen K. Bannon Sentenced to Four Months in Prison on Two Counts of Contempt of Congress"

www.justice.gov

#14 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-29 11:37 AM | Reply

#13 I never said anything of the sort. I had very low expectations for what Durham would produce.

#15 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-29 11:38 AM | Reply

#13 I never said anything of the sort. I had very low expectations for what Durham would produce.

POSTED BY BELLRINGER AT 2022-12-29 11:38 AM | REPLY

You're a damned liar too Jeff.

#16 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-29 11:44 AM | Reply

"Stephen K. Bannon Sentenced to Four Months in Prison on Two Counts of Contempt of Congress"

Only because he arrogantly and stupidly refused to legally respond.

All you have to do is fight it legally and you will never have to go.

Like all the others that were subpoenaed by Congress and refused to go did. Like Mark Meadows. Notice that none who legally challenged it have been indicted.

#17 | Posted by donnerboy at 2022-12-29 11:46 AM | Reply

It's not my fault that your memory is terrible.

#18 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-29 11:46 AM | Reply

"I had very low expectations for what Durham would produce."

Huh?

Who were you posting as???

#19 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-29 11:47 AM | Reply

The deck was and is stacked against him. As it is, the IG uncovered all sorts of corrupt acts and the media yawned.

It truly is amazing how authoritarian the left has become - the hippies of the day were very anti-establishment. Now that they have most of the power they've become what they used to abhor.

#20 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-29 12:05 PM | Reply

"Stephen K. Bannon Sentenced to Four Months in Prison on Two Counts of Contempt of Congress"

When does that ------ show up for his cavity search, shower shoes, and green eggs and Spam?

#21 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2022-12-29 12:13 PM | Reply

That rag really has turned into Pravda. It's quite sad.

#4 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Lol you cite two of the biggest flops in recent memory to toss around your favorite term.

#22 | Posted by jpw at 2022-12-29 02:07 PM | Reply

The FBI targets criminals and criminal organizations. If the GOP does not want to be targeted by the FBI they should stop harboring criminals and promoting crimes. It is so simple. If the GOP were not doing so much that is patently wrong AND illegal they would not have to worry about the FBI.

#23 | Posted by moder8 at 2022-12-29 02:15 PM | Reply

"#22 | POSTED BY JPW "

You keep saying Twitter Files are a flop.

What are you basing that on? Are they pulling a Dan Rather and using fake documents to back up their reporting?

#24 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-29 02:17 PM | Reply

"uncovered all sorts of corrupt acts"

What a laugh. How many indictments did he bring, and how many convictions did he get?

And remind us...what did any of the charges have to do with the actual oranges of the investigation?

Oh, right...NOTHING.

#25 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-29 02:42 PM | Reply

#25 IG's don't indict.

#26 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-29 02:54 PM | Reply

BellRinger sure loves to defend his hero, Trump.

#27 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 03:05 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

even after what Twitter Files has exposed
#4 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

What has been exposed?

1. ____________________

2. ____________________

3. ____________________

Please post credible links for any of your claims.

#28 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 03:09 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Clownshack sure loves to bootlick the FBI.

#29 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-29 03:10 PM | Reply

Clownshack sure loves to bootlick the FBI.

POSTED BY BELLRINGER AT 2022-12-29 03:10 PM | REPLY

Lame o retort.

#30 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-29 03:11 PM | Reply

Keep feeding from Trump's dunghole and crying about how mean the FBI are.

You delusional moron.

#31 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 03:14 PM | Reply

Lame o retort.
#30 | POSTED BY LAURAMOHR

He's been carrying Trump's water for so long, it's finally crushed him.

Pretty pathetic.

#32 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 03:15 PM | Reply

The only thing Twitter exposed was Elon Musk's stupidity.

He tanked Twitter and Tesla in one swoop.

Bravo!

#33 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 03:18 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

He's been carrying Trump's water for so long, it's finally crushed him.
Pretty pathetic.

POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK AT 2022-12-29 03:15 PM |

Yeppers. It's quite sad to see.

#34 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2022-12-29 03:22 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"IG's don't indict."

LOL. Then feel free to use ALL the fruits of Durham's investigation.

It's such a nothingburger, you can't even admit how much of a nothingburger it was.

#35 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-29 03:22 PM | Reply

#28
Nice template. I'd like to use it for:

a) a list of what Hunter Biden did.
b) a list of the above which wouldn't have been cheered if Ivanka, Jared, and/or Don Jr did them.

So far, all I see is use family connections for personal enrichment and include some for the big guy.

Anyone pretending Jared kept the entire $2 Billion?

#36 | Posted by Danforth at 2022-12-29 03:28 PM | Reply

"a list of what Hunter Biden did."

It's been FOUR YEARS and we STILL don't have any hint of an explanation from Republicans of what Hunter Biden did that is so naughty it would have gotten Trump re-elected, if not for Twitter suppressing it.

The entire premise is laughable. A $44 billion dollar joke.

#37 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-29 03:37 PM | Reply

a list of the above which wouldn't have been cheered if Ivanka, Jared, and/or Don Jr did them.

Like when the Trump klan was caught stealing money from charities for children with cancer.

I remember the deafening silence coming from republicans.

#38 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 03:37 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

It's been FOUR YEARS and we STILL don't have any hint of an explanation from Republicans of what Hunter Biden did

Well, the Chinese billionaire had it in a suitcase and then UPS lost it and then Biden paid off Twitter.

But now it's been found again.

Just you wait! It's gonna be magnificent! Yuge I tell you.

On top of that pile of lies, and even though it's an email, Republicans are stupid enough to believe there's no way to find it on any server, anywhere. Only on the hard drive of that laptop.

How are there no response emails to track down? Do republicans understand the concept of emails?

The median age range for Republicans tends to be 75 year olds and above. I doubt any of them understand how it works.

They seem to be confusing it with ordinary mail.

#39 | Posted by ClownShack at 2022-12-29 03:48 PM | Reply

Trump and the GOP controlled government the first two years he was in office. Not a peep about Hunter Biden until his dad decided to run for the WH.

Giuliani tried to coerce the Ukrainian government into finding something, anything on Trump's behalf. Ukraine had already investigated Burmisma and found no wrongdoing.

Trump was impeached for his attempted extortion of Ukraine, holding hundreds of millions of dollars in security aid hostage unless Ukraine did another investigation, repeating the one they'd already done long before Biden was a WH candidate.

What hasn't been mentioned in the press recently is Trump calling for the disbandment of NATO. Which we know in light of Putin's invasion of Ukraine, would have opened the door to a Russian march into the rest of Europe.

Now do Jared Kushner's $2 billion rescue loan from Bone Saw Crown Prince for his property at 666 Fifth Avenue, Don Jr's coke habit, Trump family ripoff of charities, tax fraud, etc etc etc etc etc.

#40 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2022-12-29 03:52 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

What are you basing that on? Are they pulling a Dan Rather and using fake documents to back up their reporting?
#24 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Because when one reads an actual analysis of the "revelations," they're the best they have from a cherry picked narrative of selected screen shots.

It's all just Musk spinning BS to try and up his profile with the MAGA moron crowd.

#41 | Posted by jpw at 2022-12-29 04:58 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Clownshack sure loves to bootlick the FBI.

#29 | Posted by BellRinger

The party of domestic terrorists sure hates law enforcement ever since their cult leader colluded with hostile enemies to get elected.

#42 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2022-12-29 05:36 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

#41. So they are lying? What's contained in the screenshots is meaningless?

Zweig, Schellenberger, Weiss and Taibbi are all hacks and are helping Musk create a false narrative?

You do realize that in response the FBI admitted that it has regular complication with Twitter and other platforms, right?

#43 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-29 05:46 PM | Reply

complication = communication

#44 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-29 05:53 PM | Reply

So they are lying? What's contained in the screenshots is meaningless?

For someone who constantly drags out the term pravda, you seem blissfully unaware that narratives can easily be crafted with real info that leads to the wrong conclusion.

You do realize that in response the FBI admitted that it has regular complication with Twitter and other platforms, right?

#43 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Communication with platforms isn't a big deal in and of itself. You do know that, right?

#45 | Posted by jpw at 2022-12-29 06:27 PM | Reply

#41. So they are lying? What's contained in the screenshots is meaningless?
#43 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

No, it's real.

We keep asking you what the meaning is.

You can't ever put it in a simple statement of fact without going off into "Imagine if Trump did this" even as Trump was the one in the White House at the time.

Your problem is that you can't say what's wrong, only that you're outraged by whatever it is.

#46 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-29 06:32 PM | Reply

#45. I understand narratives. I also know they are shown to be narratives with counter factual evidence. I am not aware of a single mainstream outlet that has reached out to Musk so they can do their own reporting. Nor am I aware of any outlet reaching out to current or former employees asking about what's been revealed. I wonder why that is.

#47 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-29 07:42 PM | Reply

#14 if you don't know what is wrong then you are beyond help.

#48 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-29 07:44 PM | Reply

That was addressed to 46 Fat fingers.

#49 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-29 07:44 PM | Reply

"I am not aware of a single mainstream outlet that has reached out to Musk so they can do their own reporting. Nor am I aware of any outlet reaching out to current or former employees asking about what's been revealed. I wonder why that is."

Has Musk offered them access to the "Twitter files"? Without that access, I can understand why no outlet is reaching out to current or former employees. I hope none of them has been asked to sign a nondisclosure document.

#50 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2022-12-29 07:54 PM | Reply

@#43 ... You do realize that in response the FBI admitted that it has regular complication with Twitter and other platforms, right? ...

I realize that the FBI has regular communication with social media platforms about threats to the United States.

So, you need to be a whole lot more specific, with links.

thx.

#51 | Posted by LampLighter at 2022-12-29 07:56 PM | Reply

@#47 ... they are shown to be narratives with counter factual evidence. ...

Please provide that evidence.

Got any links?

thx.

#52 | Posted by LampLighter at 2022-12-29 07:58 PM | Reply

@#47 ... I am not aware of a single mainstream outlet that has reached out to Musk ..

So...

Your current alias has somehow declared itself as the arbitrator for all media outlets that try to talk with Mr Musk?

Does Mr Musk know you are doing this apparent service for him?

I mean really, does Mr Musk know you are doing this for him?

#53 | Posted by LampLighter at 2022-12-29 08:02 PM | Reply

@#47 ... I also know they are shown to be narratives with counter factual evidence. ...

Got links?

thx.

#54 | Posted by LampLighter at 2022-12-29 08:03 PM | Reply

Has this changed?:

The selection of Taibbi and Weiss, who both share Musk's criticisms of the mainstream media and what they see as progressive censoriousness, has itself caused controversy. Other news outlets have not been given access to the original documents, which have been presented only in screenshots and excerpts in lengthy tweet threads, often without context.

www.npr.org

#55 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2022-12-29 08:07 PM | Reply


Other news outlets have not been given access to the original documents, which have been presented only in screenshots and excerpts in lengthy tweet threads, often without context.

So no different than any other media outlet? Not sure what the outrage is, this place goes wild with ANON sources when it targets Trump. But now you want the raw information or you don't believe it?

Whats the logic there?

#56 | Posted by oneironaut at 2022-12-29 08:26 PM | Reply

"Other news outlets have not been given access to the original documents"

A circumstance that bears a striking resemblance to Hunter Biden's Laptop...
Surely that's just a coincidence!

#57 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-29 08:33 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

It's not about anonymous sources. It's about documents. If Musk gives them access, I assume some folks in the MSM will take a look at them and report on what they find.

#58 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2022-12-29 08:34 PM | Reply

A circumstance that bears a striking resemblance to Hunter Biden's Laptop...
Surely that's just a coincidence!
#57 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

Yes, and what I, too, was just about to point out.

#59 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2022-12-29 08:35 PM | Reply

Your problem is that you can't say what's wrong, only that you're outraged by whatever it is.
#46 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

#14 if you don't know what is wrong then you are beyond help.
#48 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

^
See, that is exactly what I'm talking about!

#60 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-29 08:36 PM | Reply

@#56 ... his place goes wild with ANON sources when it targets Trump ...

From what I have seen, most of that ANON sources reporting has been shown to be quite correct once the evidence is revealed.

So, what's yer point?

That the BellRinger alias has been shamed, and you've been called in to sweep up after that embarrassment?

Jus' jokin'


:)

btw, fun tune...

Kingdom Come Time Captives
www.youtube.com


#61 | Posted by LampLighter at 2022-12-29 08:44 PM | Reply

Of course they do. The Magats need to keep their Brain Dead followers believing the same old tripe that the government is 'out to get them' and 'biased and unfair and overly liberal and stuff'.

If there is one thing the GOP learned from Fox News and Rupert Murdoch, who in turn took it from Joseph Goebbels and Nazi Germany, is "keep the lie/propaganda simple, repeat it often, and bang the drums of war continuously".

Rupert Murdoch = Emperor Palpatine,
the man is an Australian Nazi thats been
allowed to brainwash an entire swath/generation of
American people, legally (thanks to Reagan
and his revocation of the Fairness Doctrine
in 1987). People like Murdoch should be under
investigation for their ties to dark money and
dark hatred groups...

#62 | Posted by earthmuse at 2022-12-30 08:57 AM | Reply

You do realize that in response the FBI admitted that it has regular complication with Twitter and other platforms, right?

#43 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

I asked in #7 and you never answered. Are you saying that the FBI should not be allowed to have any communication with social media companies? Or not be allowed to have communication with any companies in general?

What are you actually saying was done wrong, and what are you saying should be allowed instead?

If you think the FBI should not be allowed to communicate with any companies, I am open to entertaining why you thi k that is a good idea or necessary. But currently I do not think there is a problem with the FBI communicating with companies (especially about national security threats that are relevant to them) and current law and regulations allow it as well.

#63 | Posted by gtbritishskull at 2022-12-30 09:41 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

"I asked in #7 and you never answered."

I mean, that's basically his brand, right?

#64 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2022-12-30 09:48 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Wait, I thought they had Trump on treason charges when they raided his home.

#65 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2022-12-30 10:22 AM | Reply

Wait, I thought they had Trump on treason charges when they raided his home.

#65 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

Well then, you never understood the "raid".

People searched Mara-Lago for stolen property, which they found in abundance.

Trump may yet be charged under the Espionage Act, as he may yet be tried for sedition.

And yes, he may well end it all himself by finding some peaceful, unmanly way to off himself.

#66 | Posted by Zed at 2022-12-30 10:40 AM | Reply

,"His
Toxically the FBI is from the left."

What a steaming pile of crap !

Ever hear about J Edgar Hoover?
What planet did that writer come from? absolutely ridiculous. Anyone who would write that is an ignorant fool.

#67 | Posted by danni at 2022-12-30 11:07 AM | Reply

I don't think I'll ever stop being baffled by the diametric position swap between conservatives and progressives that has occurred, mostly because of Trump.

30 years ago, it was the left that felt like the FBI and the CIA were targeting progressive organizations, with conservatives holding the position that it was warranted targeting.

Now the opposite appears to be the case, with progressives supporting and defending the 3-letters, while many conservatives, or at least Trumpists, claim it is harrassment and discrimination.

From my vantage point, the 3-Letters were probably right in both cases.

#68 | Posted by madbomber at 2022-12-30 11:16 AM | Reply

Defending Trump? Now that's going to further damage Republican reputation and will lead to more Republican defeats. People are well aware of Trump and the Washington riot, Trump and injecting bleach for Covid-19, Trump and the classified document scandal.

#69 | Posted by wolfdog at 2022-12-30 11:27 AM | Reply

Republican efforts to support Trump inspite of all his political baggage and potential crimes seems to go far beyond political partisanship. Some say that it is cultish behavior. However, I wonder if there are other factors at play i.e. a common benefactor that has issued orders to protect Trump at all cost lest everyone might be exposed for their wrong doings.

#70 | Posted by FedUpWithPols at 2022-12-30 11:29 AM | Reply

with links.
thx.
#51 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

Don't hold your breath.

#71 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2022-12-30 11:32 AM | Reply

" Has Musk offered them access to the "Twitter files"? Without that access, I can understand why no outlet is reaching out to current or former employees. I hope none of them has been asked to sign a nondisclosure document."

He has given 4 journalists access. Given the scope one would assume other outlets would be chomping at the bit to dig in and would be begging for access. Nothing but crickets so far.

#72 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-30 12:37 PM | Reply

"

I asked in #7 and you never answered. Are you saying that the FBI should not be allowed to have any communication with social media companies? Or not be allowed to have communication with any companies in general?"

I'm not going to do your work for you. We now have ten news dumps as to s what has been going on. Twitter Files are open to the public.

#73 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-30 12:40 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Here is a fairly balanced take on this issue

jacobin.com

#74 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-30 12:47 PM | Reply

With the Twitter Files I do understand skepticism given the self promotion by rolling the reporting out on Twitter itself and giving the reporting a flashy name.

#75 | Posted by BellRinger at 2022-12-30 12:52 PM | Reply

Shut up loser, nobody cares what you post.

#76 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2022-12-30 02:08 PM | Reply

Here is a fairly balanced take on this issue

jacobin.com

#74 | Posted by BellRinger

No here's a balanced take:

In 2016 hostile nations used our social media companies to spread lies to influence our election. For the next election, government and social media companies worked together to prevent that from happening again. As they should have.

This is nothing compared to when Nixon actually made CBS cancel the smothers brothers comedy show for mocking him and speaking against his war in vietnam.

#77 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2022-12-30 02:54 PM | Reply

from jacobin.com

"In fact, much of the supposedly suspicious activity had nothing to do with adversarial governments at all. The FBI repeatedly passed on suspicions and forwarded news articles alleging sinister foreign hands behind the George Floyd protests, the existence of pro-Trump African Americans, and various suspect accounts, only to be told they were all of domestic origin. One analyst "found no links to Russia," they wrote, and neither did another worker who carried out a thorough double-check. "I can brainstorm with [redacted] and see if we can dig even deeper and try to find a stronger connection," the analyst helpfully offers."

...

"The bureau likewise pressured Twitter to relax its privacy standards and hand over more user information. It asked executives if they would revise their terms of service to effectively allow intelligence agencies to scoop up open-source data more easily (they said no), and if they'd share information about accounts using VPNs, which are used to mask online activity (also no)."

^
I put the stuff in bold where jacobin doesn't seem to be able to connect the dots.

And there's also this admission right at the end, that we are being spoon-fed a narrative. Nobody has the full story -- except the one man who is not releasing the full story.

"(Taibbi noted in response to a question of mine on Callin that "Palestinian accounts are often the canary in the coal mine for new moderation or censorship techniques," but he added that they weren't featured in the first dataset he pulled. "I'm hoping that once we're able to have a more global look at things that we can start looking at that," he said.)"

#78 | Posted by snoofy at 2022-12-30 03:36 PM | Reply

Watching bellringer getting ------------ is fairly amusing.

#79 | Posted by VictorZiblis at 2022-12-30 06:17 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2023 World Readable

Drudge Retort