Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, January 11, 2023

The Pentagon formally dropped its COVID-19 vaccination mandate Tuesday ...

END;

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

That's rather dumb to be honest. Of course Gracie would post it.

#1 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2023-01-11 05:33 AM | Reply

Good. Hurry up and die and reduce the surplus population.

#2 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2023-01-11 09:48 AM | Reply

Well, the right's undermining of the military wasn't on my 2023 Bingo card.

Gonna be an interesting year.

#3 | Posted by jpw at 2023-01-11 10:01 AM | Reply

Undermining everything to own the libs is always in play.

#4 | Posted by Nixon at 2023-01-11 11:40 AM | Reply

The mRNA Health Supplement already has more confirmed kills on US Servicemen than any Chinaman could ever hope to have....

Hopefully, the legal minds can find a way to litigate on behalf of everyone who was forced to quit...and financially destroy the pharmaceutical companies that pushed this --------.

#5 | Posted by Mao_Content at 2023-01-11 11:54 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

Well, the right's undermining of the military wasn't on my 2023 Bingo card.

LOL "Undermining"

STFU you mouth-breathing ------.

------- drama queen

#6 | Posted by Mao_Content at 2023-01-11 11:55 AM | Reply

#6 after #5 is hilariously self-blind comedy!

#7 | Posted by YAV at 2023-01-11 11:59 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

"The mRNA Health Supplement already has more confirmed kills on US Servicemen than any Chinaman could ever hope to have...."

The Trump Vaccine is worse than the China Flu, huh?

#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2023-01-11 12:02 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

and financially destroy the pharmaceutical companies that pushed this --------.

#5 | POSTED BY MAO_CONTENT

------- drama queen

#6 | POSTED BY MAO_CONTENT


Takes one to know one, eh Ms Mao?

#9 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-01-11 12:20 PM | Reply

This thread is RIGHT NEXT to the thread about Diamond, the anti-vaxxer, dying of COVID.

#10 | Posted by Sycophant at 2023-01-11 12:22 PM | Reply

---- Diamond.
---- the troops too.
--GOP Vaccine Policy

#11 | Posted by snoofy at 2023-01-11 12:23 PM | Reply

Ms Mao obviously doesn't care if our troops are under prepared for another war.

There is reason they give vaccines to our troops.

Republicans just purposely undermined that.

Here is a carefully worded statement from the pentagon on the subject of vaccines.

"Vaccination enhances operational readiness and protects the Force," according to the memo. "All commanders have the responsibility and authority to preserve the Department's compelling interests in mission accomplishment. This responsibility and authority includes the ability to maintain military readiness, unit cohesion, good order and discipline, and the health and safety of a resilient Joint Force."

#12 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-01-11 12:31 PM | Reply

#6

Such a fragile little vessel, ain't ya?

#13 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2023-01-11 12:40 PM | Reply

Stupid.

1. The mRNA vaccines have already proven to have saved millions of lives.

2. The military already mandates a number of other also effective vaccines.

There is no reason to drop this mandate, other than political pressure. But we now live in a world where politicization is more important than the truth.

#14 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2023-01-11 12:45 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

" There is no reason to drop this mandate, other than political pressure. But we now live in a world where politicization is more important than the truth."

They pushed thousands of servicemen out and recruiting numbers are down. This is about military preparedness.

#15 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-01-11 01:02 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Over 98% of the active duty military is at least partially vaccinated against COVID-19, directly reflected in a sharp drop in active duty deathssince the delta variant surge that began in late fall and lasted into November.

For going on two months, the only deaths have been in the reserve component, where vaccination deadlines stretched to the new year for some of the services, or until the end of June for the Army.

www.militarytimes.com

The chance of dying from the vaccination is so infinitesimally small it is negligible.

#16 | Posted by YAV at 2023-01-11 01:11 PM | Reply

Glad the military culled the ranks from these morons. Better yet they're the ones dying from their freedumb.

#17 | Posted by YAV at 2023-01-11 01:14 PM | Reply

This is about military preparedness.

#15 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Never served a day in your life yet you think you know what's best for our troops?

Folks are pushed out of the military every day for one reason or another.

Should we also allow Nazis in the ranks just to bolster recruiting numbers?

This is about military preparedness but it's also about discipline in the ranks. You will follow orders or you will face the consequences and probably get tossed. All those who could not follow orders did not and do not belong in the military. And they deserve what they got and deserve no compensation for their bad choices.

#18 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-01-11 01:24 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

They pushed thousands of servicemen out and recruiting numbers are down. This is about military preparedness.

#15 | Posted by BellRinger

Yet the average IQ of the military went up a few points...

#19 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2023-01-11 01:25 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

" Should we also allow Nazis in the ranks just to bolster recruiting numbers?"

Did you actually just draw a comparison between Nazi's and soldiers refusing to take a needle?

#20 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-01-11 01:31 PM | Reply

Did you actually just draw a comparison between Nazi's and soldiers refusing to take a needle?

#20 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

No but you just did.

#21 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-01-11 01:35 PM | Reply

They pushed thousands of servicemen out and recruiting numbers are down. This is about military preparedness.

#15 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Nobody was pushed out, you f'n idiot. All they had to do was take the vaccine. Just like ALL the other vaccines they were mandated to take. And if they can't make do with the more than 2 million active and reserve personnel they already have, we have a MUCH bigger problem.

And we DO have a much bigger problem. There's no reason to keep a military that costs us as much as the next 10 largest combined. You want to cut government expense? Start with the armed forces.

#22 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2023-01-11 01:41 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Re 20.

So if that little anecdote bothers you so much what about all those soldiers that failed a drug test for what is now legal in most states? Should we be upset for them disobeying orders and should they now be reinstated and or compensated??

#23 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-01-11 01:50 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Look I am Pro-vaccination and I have had all made available to me for COVID but things are changing. Based on emerging data from the UK, you are actually more likely to get COVID the more vaccinated you are. Now I haven't dove into the why on that but it is interesting.

Also the latest variants ramping up right now are quickly trending even more toward more mild infections with a great many being symptomless infection.

Honestly, I am not going to pretend to know the best way to go forward.

#24 | Posted by GalaxiePete at 2023-01-11 05:56 PM | Reply

LOL "Undermining"
STFU you mouth-breathing ------.
------- drama queen

#6 | POSTED BY MAO_CONTENT

mikejohnson.house.gov

"We get a lot of vaccinations. Anthrax is very, very low out there and we still get an anthrax vaccination. So I think getting vaccinated is part of the readiness issue of the health of the force," Milley said. "We are an institution that has a sole set of requirements in terms of the health of the force, and shots, and etc. There's a policy and our job is to enforce the policy."

Joint Chiefs think it necessary to maintain health and readiness.

There's also the issue of one of the two major political parties taking the position that disobeying orders that are politically expedient for them is OK.

So yeah, undermining.

Stick to ------- cattle, --------.

#25 | Posted by jpw at 2023-01-11 09:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

They pushed thousands of servicemen out and recruiting numbers are down. This is about military preparedness.

#15 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Read the link above.

Brass disagrees with you.

Probably because you're just repeating mindlessly what you've heard but haven't actually bothered to think about.

#26 | Posted by jpw at 2023-01-11 09:03 PM | Reply

Based on emerging data from the UK, you are actually more likely to get COVID the more vaccinated you are. Now I haven't dove into the why on that but it is interesting.

There are so many confounding issues and statistical artifacts possible there that that statement is practically meaningless.

#27 | Posted by jpw at 2023-01-11 09:05 PM | Reply

Anthrax is very, very low out there and we still get an anthrax vaccination

That was a --------, too.

In later court cases, DoD officials denied the vaccine was "investigational" and said the department had long considered it for use against inhalation anthrax, despite a lack of testing or approvals.

The actual threat of weaponized anthrax, and whether the vaccine would protect troops, was questionable.

A 2000 report by the U.S. House Committee on Government Reform noted that using a vaccine as a "mandatory, force-wide countermeasure" to weaponized anthrax was "unrealistic."

Just prior to that report, and against the larger controversy surrounding the vaccine program, then-Capt. Thomas Rempfer and Maj. Russ Dingle were tasked by their Connecticut Air National Guard commander to research the anthrax program and provide him a report as to its safety and efficacy.

"We weren't looking to refuse this vaccine," Rempfer, now a retired lieutenant colonel, told Military Times. "We weren't looking to get involved in this issue."

But once they'd completed their research into the vaccine's troubled history, the report they delivered called for a halt to shots and a serious reconsideration of the whole program.

Bad example, Pussoir...stick to beaker cleanliness

www.armytimes.com

#28 | Posted by Mao_Content at 2023-01-11 09:11 PM | Reply

#28 | Posted by Mao_Content

Which is more common: Covid19 or anthrax? THink hard now.

#29 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2023-01-11 09:13 PM | Reply

Republicans: "We can't have our soldiers in foxholes with women or gay people! It threatens our security!"

Also republicans: "There's nothing wrong with covid 19 ravaging through combat units in foxholes! Military readiness is overrated!"

#30 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2023-01-11 09:15 PM | Reply

I don't blame you entirely, Pussoir.

You're a product of your generation: A sniveling little compliant ruminant brought up on a steady diet of electronic media and targeted product/political placement.

You're not a "scientist", because you're incapable of thinking like a scientist.

It never crosses your mind that you're being misled (or outright lied to) by interests whose sole motivation is the acquisition of money and/or power.

At this point, you're simply a fan cheering for a football team---with all the rationality and accountability that comes with being a "fan" of a football team.

#31 | Posted by Mao_Content at 2023-01-11 09:20 PM | Reply

Which is more common: Covid19 or anthrax?

What would have been a more likely occurrence on the battlefield at the time the Anthrax vaccine was forced down people's throats: COVID19 or Anthrax?

#32 | Posted by Mao_Content at 2023-01-11 09:22 PM | Reply

Bad example, Pussoir...stick to beaker cleanliness

It wasn't my example.

#33 | Posted by jpw at 2023-01-11 09:28 PM | Reply

A sniveling little compliant ruminant

Gotta love daddy's boy thinking running his fake Daddy Ranch makes him whatever he thinks he is.

The world sees pampered little bitch who earned nothing.

Mao sees God's gift to humanity.

You're not a "scientist", because you're incapable of thinking like a scientist.

Says the guy who probably barely passed high school science and couldn't pass it now.

For ----- and giggles, fill me in on what you think a scientist should be and how you think you're in a position to be it.

It never crosses your mind that you're being misled (or outright lied to) by interests whose sole motivation is the acquisition of money and/or power.

It's never crossed your mind that you're a buffoon who isn't equipped to assess scientific information.

As evidence by the pathetic pat on the back for the shallow, lazy ass thinking that is the above.

#34 | Posted by jpw at 2023-01-11 09:33 PM | Reply

What would have been a more likely occurrence on the battlefield at the time the Anthrax vaccine was forced down people's throats: COVID19 or Anthrax?
#32 | POSTED BY MAO_CONTENT

What's a more irrelevant question-the above or "has Mao's wife ever been brought to ------?"

#35 | Posted by jpw at 2023-01-11 09:33 PM | Reply

You're a product of your generation: A sniveling little compliant ruminant brought up on a steady diet of electronic media and targeted product/political placement.

You're not a "scientist", because you're incapable of thinking like a scientist.

It never crosses your mind that you're being misled (or outright lied to) by interests whose sole motivation is the acquisition of money and/or power.

At this point, you're simply a fan cheering for a football team---with all the rationality and accountability that comes with being a "fan" of a football team.

#31 | Posted by Mao_Content

Nothing like the generation who's brains were so rotted by fox news that they turned into the cult of a fascist con man trying to call any other generation stupid or brainwashed.

Every single thing you just posted was a completely accurate description of your own party.

#36 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2023-01-11 09:41 PM | Reply

Mao sees God's gift to humanity.

I am God's Gift to humanity...but that's another story.

shallow, lazy ass thinking

And you just unintentionally projected your problem. Congratulations.

You lack the ability to think critically, because you're a fan, not a scientist.

You're incapable of digesting the fact that public policy, be it a decision to go to war....or mandate a health supplement...or ban a specific product...etc....isn't necessarily in the public interest.

Pharmaceutical companies, who lobby the ---- out of the US Government, made a ------- of money colluding with each other pretending that the use of their product was an existential imperative to the continuation of humanity itself.

And it was (and continues to be) complete --------.

That's why I get such a kick out of you beating your chest like a little Bantam rooster pretending like you possess any kind of specialized knowledge on the subject matter.

You're a ------- cheering for a football team---nothing more.

#37 | Posted by Mao_Content at 2023-01-11 09:53 PM | Reply

You lack the ability to think critically, because you're a fan, not a scientist.

Or...I actually know what I'm talking about instead of regurgitating nonsense I read but don't understand.

And it was (and continues to be) complete --------.

You haven't shown that you're remotely informed enough to make that assessment.

If anything, you've shown you're way to ignorant to make that assessment.

That's why I get such a kick out of you beating your chest like a little Bantam rooster pretending like you possess any kind of specialized knowledge on the subject matter.

I do, actually.

But don't let that stop your Dunning-Kruger ass from asserting made up -------- based on unfalsifiable crap as some sort of insight.

You're a ------- cheering for a football team---nothing more.
#37 | POSTED BY MAO_CONTENT

The extent of your understand and knowledge is that of a sports fan.

Which is why you're using the analogy and insisting everyone else is on that level.

Sorry, but you really are just that mundane and average. Time to deal with it.

#38 | Posted by jpw at 2023-01-11 10:08 PM | Reply

"Joint Chiefs think it necessary to maintain health and readiness."

So if Biden and the joint chiefs support the mandate then why would the pentagon drop it?

who is undermining who?

#39 | Posted by eberly at 2023-01-11 10:19 PM | Reply

Or...I actually know what I'm talking about

I don't see any evidence of that.

You're indistinguishable from any ------ column-writer for Salon simply regurgitating information he's been spoon-fed by someone else---sans the disciplined writing.

unfalsifiable crap

Like COVID vaccine efficacy?

Sorry, but you really are just that mundane and average.

Projection is cringe, Joseph Whittaker Pussoir.

LOL...

You really are a beaker washer, aren't you?

#40 | Posted by Mao_Content at 2023-01-11 10:26 PM | Reply

"Like COVID vaccine efficacy? "

Like most of the dead were either unvaxxed, or under-vaxxed.
www.medicaleconomics.com

#41 | Posted by Danforth at 2023-01-11 10:33 PM | Reply

Like most of the dead were either unvaxxed, or under-vaxxed.

Not anymore...

#42 | Posted by Mao_Content at 2023-01-11 10:35 PM | Reply

Your question is literally answered in the second paragraph of the article.

#43 | Posted by jpw at 2023-01-11 10:39 PM | Reply

I don't see any evidence of that.
You're indistinguishable from any ------ column-writer for Salon simply regurgitating information he's been spoon-fed by someone else---sans the disciplined writing.

LOL like you're informed enough to see it.

You probably had never heard of a coronavirus before 2020 but yet you can assess accuracy of information about the entire pandemic.

STFU idiot.

Like COVID vaccine efficacy?

Which you've repeatedly misstated. Because you read some ---- somewhere written by people grifting off of being contrarian.

Projection is cringe,

Says the guy who splashes his inadequacies across this board every time he posts.

#44 | Posted by jpw at 2023-01-11 10:42 PM | Reply

Not anymore...

#42 | POSTED BY MAO_CONTENT

Tends to happen as that group gets ever and ever smaller.

#45 | Posted by jpw at 2023-01-11 10:42 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Your question is literally answered in the second paragraph of the article.

#43 | POSTED BY JPW

You are assuming that he read and understood and really wants to discuss the article.

Magamoroons are not here for that.

#46 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-01-11 10:44 PM | Reply

"Not anymore..."

On the contrary. You're pretending there are two groups. There are six.

Here's the true barometer: How many five-timers are dying now, compared to one-timers, compared to unvaxxed?

#47 | Posted by Danforth at 2023-01-11 10:52 PM | Reply

Tends to happen as that group gets ever and ever smaller.

Just like initial "efficacy" is "evident" when the group is far bigger.

This is a ------- charade, Pussoir.

A non-falsifiable hypothesis.

And the shareholders and their politico enablers are laughing all the way to the bank.

#48 | Posted by Mao_Content at 2023-01-11 10:55 PM | Reply

A non-falsifiable hypothesis.

If it's non-falsifiable, then how are you claiming they don't work?

BTW there's plenty of studies looking at efficacy. Including the original clinical trials and additional analyses conducted afterwards.

#49 | Posted by jpw at 2023-01-11 10:58 PM | Reply

Here's the true barometer: How many five-timers are dying now, compared to one-timers, compared to unvaxxed?

A barometer is a simple instrument that measures atmospheric pressure using very simple metrics.

Attempting to extrapolate mortality data between "Five-Timers vs One-Timers vs Zero Timers" of an experimental mRNA Health Supplement vs a highly survivable respiratory illness is absurd.

#50 | Posted by Mao_Content at 2023-01-11 11:01 PM | Reply

of an experimental mRNA Health Supplement vs a highly survivable respiratory illness is absurd

Cutesy word salad aside, no it's not absurd.

Did they not teach stats at Texas Tech?

#51 | Posted by jpw at 2023-01-11 11:03 PM | Reply

If it's non-falsifiable, then how are you claiming they don't work?

I'm not claiming they don't work.

You're claiming that they do.

First, to prevent infection. Which was --------.

Second to prevent transmission, which was also --------.

Now the prevailing line is that you still probably get it, but you won't get it as bad---which continues to be --------.

It's human medicine.

Every body responds differently to COVID based on any number of factors---and there's no evidence that this stupid ------- product, in and of itself, has any impact whatsoever on the severity of illness in an individual.

#52 | Posted by Mao_Content at 2023-01-11 11:09 PM | Reply

I think the real question is how many lives has the vaccines saved?

The answer?

Two Years of U.S. COVID-19 Vaccines Have Prevented Millions of Hospitalizations and Deaths

"It has been two years since the first COVID-19 vaccine was given to a patient in the United States. Since then, the U.S. has administered more than 655 million doses " 80 percent of the population has received at least one dose " with the cumulative effect of preventing more than 18 million additional hospitalizations and more than 3 million additional deaths. The swift development of the vaccine, emergency authorization to distribute widely, and rapid rollout have been instrumental in curbing hospitalization and death, while mitigating socioeconomic repercussions of the pandemic."

www.commonwealthfund.org

#53 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-01-11 11:10 PM | Reply

Did they not teach stats at Texas Tech?

They do.

Which is exactly why it's so obvious this such a narrative-based ------- clown show.

#54 | Posted by Mao_Content at 2023-01-11 11:13 PM | Reply

I think the real question is how many lives has the vaccines saved?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Case in point.

#55 | Posted by Mao_Content at 2023-01-11 11:14 PM | Reply

Case in point.

#55 | POSTED BY MAO_CONTENT

Case in point?

It proves yiu don't have a clue what you are blabbering about.

Go ahead and prove it didn't save lives. But show your sources because you are but a source of reliable information. Obviously.

My link disproves your theory that vaccines don't work to prevent deaths and hospitalization. Let's see yours.

Or is my source just "fake news" because it doesn't match your delusions?

#56 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-01-11 11:20 PM | Reply

^___

"because you are NOT a source of reliable information. Obviously"

#57 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-01-11 11:21 PM | Reply

So the Pentagon is still taking orders from Trump? :-)

Of course this isn't some evidence these folks don't believe in vaccines.

They just decided to eliminate (with exceptions) the mandate.

Did the Pentagon decide the mandate wasn't worth losing more troops?

#58 | Posted by eberly at 2023-01-11 11:22 PM | Reply

Did the Pentagon decide the mandate wasn't worth losing more troops?

#58 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Did you actually read the article? No you obviously didn't because the answer to your question is right there in it.

#59 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-01-11 11:26 PM | Reply

It was a trick question to reveal that you didn't read the article, Clipboy

#60 | Posted by eberly at 2023-01-11 11:30 PM | Reply

First, to prevent infection. Which was --------.
Second to prevent transmission, which was also --------.
Now the prevailing line is that you still probably get it, but you won't get it as bad---which continues to be --------.

No, actually none of that is --------. First two were true for the strain the vaxx was designed against. Predictably, that changed as variants arose.

This is basic virology/immunology.

The last one remains true and has been so throughout the use of the vaxx.

and there's no evidence that this stupid ------- product, in and of itself, has any impact whatsoever on the severity of illness in an individual.
#52 | POSTED BY MAO_CONTENT

Right. Because epidemiologists don't have study methods and stats to use to analyze this stuff. It's just made up and they've been found out by a fake rancher from Texas. Suuuuuurre.

#61 | Posted by jpw at 2023-01-11 11:31 PM | Reply

Case in point?

Yes. Case in point.

...with the cumulative effect of preventing more than 18 million additional hospitalizations and more than 3 million additional deaths...

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

That's unqualified ---------.

If you took the 3500 level statistics at Texas Tech, you'd understand.

Semper Fi

Mouflon -----

#62 | Posted by Mao_Content at 2023-01-11 11:32 PM | Reply

Which is exactly why it's so obvious this such a narrative-based ------- clown show.

#54 | POSTED BY MAO_CONTENT

So what's wrong with the studies that have been published showing vaxx efficacy?

Specifics, now. Not bald assertions.

#63 | Posted by jpw at 2023-01-11 11:32 PM | Reply

"That's unqualified ---------."

Prove it.

Show us your sources.

Saying you took a class in Texas proves absolutely nothing because everyone here knows YOU are NOT a reliable source.

#64 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-01-11 11:42 PM | Reply

So what's wrong with the studies that have been published showing vaxx efficacy?

A study is a study.

The controls and limitations in such studies involving emergency, experimental "vaccines" with a major political imperative behind their approval and a massive profit incentive for their manufacturers are potentially problematic.

#65 | Posted by Mao_Content at 2023-01-11 11:45 PM | Reply

So you have nothing but assertions. Got it.

#66 | Posted by jpw at 2023-01-11 11:48 PM | Reply

So you have nothing but assertions. Got it.

#66 | POSTED BY JPW

He's got nothing but the usual magamaroon BS.

"If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with BS."

#67 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-01-11 11:52 PM | Reply

The article, that Clipboy read, says that the Pentagon still strongly supports vaccines and is allowing leaders to still require vaccines for specific deployments.

But they are dropping the mandate.......

#68 | Posted by eberly at 2023-01-11 11:54 PM | Reply

So you have nothing but assertions. Got it.

Neither do you, to be quite frank.

He's got nothing but the usual magamaroon BS.

STFU, Captain Prevagen.

Gunsmoke is on.....go watch it and get sleepy like your kids tell you to do.

You don't need to be up this late.

Semper Fi

Mouflon -----

#69 | Posted by Mao_Content at 2023-01-12 12:04 AM | Reply

Neither do you, to be quite frank.

I guess the published literature is nothing.

But what do scientists and doctors know when there's fake ranchers on the case?

#70 | Posted by jpw at 2023-01-12 12:07 AM | Reply

Oh whaaa!

Ms Mao has got nothing but the usual Magamaroon BS with nothing to support his wild maga assertions so now all he has left is his kindergarten insults.

Isn't that "special"?

#71 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-01-12 12:11 AM | Reply

Semper Fi

Mouflon -----
#69 | POSTED BY MAO_CONTENT

WTF does that even mean magamoroon?

You are always faithful to a sheeps -----?

What freakin weirdo.

#72 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-01-12 12:15 AM | Reply

@#65 ... A study is a study. ...

Yeah. But what's yer point?

... The controls and limitations in such studies involving emergency, experimental "vaccines" with a major political imperative behind their approval and a massive profit incentive for their manufacturers are potentially problematic....

Possibly.

So, what evidence have ya got?

#73 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-01-12 12:36 AM | Reply

WTF does that even mean

"Molon Labe" is (rough) Latin for "Come and Take Them"

I prefer the "Mouflon -----" corruption.

It's kinda of an insider MAGAt, Insurrectionist term we use amongst ourselves.

We would have long ago overthrown the government in a Fascist Coup(TM) were it not for hard-core Boomer Marines like you standing athwart our efforts.....ready to dump you machine-gun clips into us Insurrectionists...

Stand down and Stand By, Devil Dawg...

Yer doing the Lord's werk...

Semper Fi

Mouflon -----

#74 | Posted by Mao_Content at 2023-01-12 12:56 AM | Reply

So, what evidence have ya got?

#73 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

No evidence.

Just that he attended a 3500 level statistics class at Texas Tech. (Who cares?)

And he's always faithful to some sheep's ----- apparently. (And that's just freakin weird)

#75 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-01-12 12:58 AM | Reply

Got a problem with it? Take it up with Joe. He's in charge of the Pentagon.

#76 | Posted by visitor_ at 2023-01-12 02:23 AM | Reply

@#76 ... Got a problem with it? ...

With what?

... Take it up with Joe. ...

Take what up with Pres Biden?

In other words, WTF is your comment talking about?

Jus' askin' 'caus it is difficult to give a rational reply to an irrational comment.


#77 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-01-12 03:01 AM | Reply

He's in charge of the Pentagon.

#76 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

Yes Joe is the CIC. But he doesn't make the laws or appropriate the funding.

Congress legislated that the pentagon drop the Covid vaccine mandate as part of the appropriations bill. And only the Covid vaccine mandate. Not any other vaccine mandates.

Biden has nothing to do with it. The pentagon will decide if it affects troop readiness. Not President Biden.

If you had half a clue as to how our government works you would know that.

#78 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-01-12 03:57 AM | Reply

Biden signed off on it. It was not a deal breaker for Dems. Time to move on.

#79 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2023-01-12 07:09 AM | Reply

#77 "Pentagon Drops Covid Vaccine Mandate for Troops"

Got a problem with context? Take it up with the owner of the site. Threaded blogs would make that possible.

#80 | Posted by visitor_ at 2023-01-12 10:52 AM | Reply

"Pentagon Drops Covid Vaccine Mandate for Troops"

G-d Loves Dead Soldiers.
--Westboro Baptist Church

#81 | Posted by snoofy at 2023-01-12 12:42 PM | Reply

You lack the ability to think critically, because you're a fan, not a scientist.
#37 | Posted by Mao_Content

This coming from the QTard party...

#82 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2023-01-12 01:19 PM | Reply

"They pushed thousands of servicemen out and recruiting numbers are down. This is about military preparedness.

#15 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER "
Having served in a combat unit I would have to admit I would be completely happy if those guys that I served with refused to take a vax and were tossed out as I would not trust them any longer. I know some young soldiers that feel the same way I do. We all took numerous shots when we went into the military and there was no big fuss except sore arms. I received the Swine flu shot in 1980 and it put me into the hospital as it did many at Fort Gordon, GA and they immediately stopped giving it to the military folks and did not give it to the civilians as they figured if it made a bunch of young strong healthy people sick it would kill the young and old. Why on earth would the US military wish to hurt their troopers these days with the COVID vax? Does not make any logical sense.

#83 | Posted by Wildman62 at 2023-01-12 06:42 PM | Reply

Does not make any logical sense.

#83 | POSTED BY WILDMAN62

Being a magamoroon means you don't have to make any logical sense about anything anymore!

Freedumb!!

#84 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-01-12 08:46 PM | Reply

"Biden signed off on it. "

It was buried in the appropriation bill.

But you are right it's not a deal breaker and you know why?

The pentagon made clear in its carefully worded statement that they will still mandate it for soldiers anyway if they deem it necessary for troop readiness.

#85 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-01-12 08:49 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2023 World Readable

Drudge Retort