Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, January 19, 2023

An investigation into who leaked a bombshell Supreme Court ruling overturning the federal constitutional right to abortion weeks before it was officially released failed to identify the culprit, the court said Thursday.




Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Was it Alito or the drunken gang rapist?

#1 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2023-01-19 02:35 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

My gut says it was Chief Justice John Roberts in a last ditch effort to change the outcome of Dobbs ruling.

#2 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2023-01-19 02:40 PM | Reply

It was Ginni Thomas, wasn't it?

#3 | Posted by snoofy at 2023-01-19 02:41 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

SCOTUS: You should trust us, and not disparage the Court.

Also SCOTUS: We can't seem to find the leaker yet, so we'll just end the investigation.

#4 | Posted by Danforth at 2023-01-19 02:46 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

They probably figured it was Virginia Thomas or Alito.

#5 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2023-01-19 02:47 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

In other words they know it was a Justice not a clerk and don't want to embarrass the court further.

#6 | Posted by qcp at 2023-01-19 02:54 PM | Reply

We know damn well who leaked it since they "can't" find out who leaked it.

#7 | Posted by Sycophant at 2023-01-19 03:29 PM | Reply

We know damn well who leaked it


Clarence and Ginni.

#8 | Posted by Zed at 2023-01-19 05:44 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Fact is, the list of must probable suspects was always the universe of the Justices.


#9 | Posted by Zed at 2023-01-19 05:46 PM | Reply


Obviously Kavanaugh was running the investigation.

#10 | Posted by Danforth at 2023-01-19 09:16 PM | Reply


"None of them were talked to" ON PURPOSE

They didn't dare! Everybody they interviewed denied they had anything to do with the leak, or knew who did, and had to sign a sworn affidavit that they were telling the truth.

There are six conservative justices who would have to lie under oath. Especially one of them about his nosey, interfering, bat-shjt crazy wife who thinks she's a "shadow" Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court

#11 | Posted by Twinpac at 2023-01-20 01:10 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

This should be an easy task. The Roberts Court has evolved into a shameful institution.

#12 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2023-01-20 01:10 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1


"This should be an easy task."

It WAS an easy task. They just avoided asking the only people who actually knew the answer. The Justices themselves.

Then there was Roberts' candy-ass word-salad about closing the investigation.

How convenient!

#13 | Posted by Twinpac at 2023-01-20 01:23 AM | Reply

Roberts may think he's preserving the integrity of the court but he's doing the exact opposite.

In fact, now he's made himself a co-conspirator.

Nobody is fooled. The U.S. Supreme Court has completely lost the right to use the word "supreme." Now they're just another cult.

#14 | Posted by Twinpac at 2023-01-20 01:39 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

I believe they know exactly who it is, but the close ties to Brandon and the Dems means they will never be revealed.

#15 | Posted by gasman21 at 2023-01-20 06:59 AM | Reply


You have more heads than a hydra.

Hydra: look it up.

#16 | Posted by Zed at 2023-01-20 08:08 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#14-I made the "nothing supreme" claim last summer, and they've only added more and more truth to it since then. They are a disgrace on the level of MTG and Boebert. If Biden wanted to make his document problem fade away, he'd make reforming the court front & center.

#17 | Posted by Yodagirl at 2023-01-20 11:12 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

How does POTUS "reform" the court? The Executive has no power over the judiciary outside of appointing justices for the Senate to approve.

#18 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-01-20 11:16 AM | Reply

"How does POTUS "reform" the court?"

Maybe interview the 10 people most likely to have done it. Maybe interview recently departed clerks. They did neither.

Skipping those two central groups smacks of the Kavanaugh "investigation".

#19 | Posted by Danforth at 2023-01-20 11:24 AM | Reply

#19 You weren't addressing my question, but that's OK, yours was consistent with the thread.

I agree that the investigation to find the leaker was a sham.

#20 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-01-20 11:27 AM | Reply

"I agree that the investigation to find the leaker was a sham."

It may not have been. But the announcement certainly was.

And from the yelps when no one asked, it sure looks like Alito.

#21 | Posted by Danforth at 2023-01-20 11:32 AM | Reply

They didn't interview the Justices or their spouses.

Let me repeat that.


I wonder why they didn't catch the leaker...

#22 | Posted by Sycophant at 2023-01-20 02:44 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Why should we care who leaked this horrible decision that actually revealed the purgery committed by at least five members of the court to help them gain Senate approval. I'd be much more interested in investigating that. They obviously lied,

' under oath, in Senate hearings. "Settled law" ass liars. If a 50 year old decision isn't precedent then nothing is. The Supreme Court has completely lost the respect of the Amerivan people and no amount of whining by either Roberts or Alito will restore it.

#23 | Posted by danni at 2023-01-21 08:38 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

The Supremes continue to embarrass themselves and the "honorable court." Look up the google for "France 1789." I submit the Infamous Six are completely in thrall to the former "President."

#24 | Posted by john47 at 2023-01-21 10:25 AM | Reply

Amazing what happens when you begin an investigation with no intention of finding the leaker. They never intended question the Justices and their spouses, one of whom has always been the primary suspect. It was most likely Alito, done to stop the other Xtian Nationalists from getting squishy when the fascism hit the road.

#25 | Posted by _Gunslinger_ at 2023-01-21 06:43 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2023 World Readable

Drudge Retort