Investigate Special Treatment of Supreme Court Justices

Friday, January 27, 2023

Congress is being urged to scrutinize the manner in which the Supreme Court probed the leak of its own draft opinion overturning abortion rights, including whether the nine justices received "special treatment" from investigators.

Posted by qcp at 12:31 PM | 7 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry |

END;

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Justices were not formally interviewed nor did they sign sworn statements/affidavits unlike all other staff.

So I think we know now who leaked the document.

#1 | Posted by Sycophant at 2023-01-27 01:26 PM | Reply

It was...Colonel Alito in the break room with a fax machine. Almost every one of the justices had motivation to leak the document. According to a certain Dotard, one of these robed folk is going to jail...

#2 | Posted by catdog at 2023-01-27 01:59 PM | Reply

IMPEACH THE TRAITORS!

#3 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2023-01-27 02:55 PM | Reply

CATDOG

I don't think a Supreme Court Justice can be criminally charged but they can certainly be impeached by Congress.

It's a shame Roberts took the low road in their internal investigation. It was so obvious, even to us laypeople, that his report was a cover up ~ and an unbelievable one at that. It was a really stupid thing to do on his part. Frankly, I thought a Supreme Court Justice would be smarter than to do something that dumb. Apparently not.

Now I think every conservative Justice on that court is complicit.

#4 | Posted by Twinpac at 2023-01-27 08:21 PM | Reply

Exclusive: Supreme Court did not disclose financial relationship with expert brought in to review leak probe

The Supreme Court did not disclose its longstanding financial ties with former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff even as it touted him as an expert who independently validated its investigation into who leaked the draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade.

www.cnn.com

#5 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2023-01-27 08:28 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Thanks for that link, GAL.

The cover up gets weaker by the day.

#6 | Posted by Twinpac at 2023-01-27 09:06 PM | Reply

YW, Twin. I did post it in response to your observation:

It's a shame Roberts took the low road in their internal investigation. It was so obvious, even to us laypeople, that his report was a cover up ~ and an unbelievable one at that.

#7 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2023-01-27 09:10 PM | Reply