Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, May 19, 2023

The FBI has revoked the security clearances of three agents for issues related to the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, according to a letter from the bureau to congressional investigators obtained by ABC News.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

This is big. The FBI has called -------- on Gym Jordan. The "whistleblowers" turned out to be criminals that lost their clearances for anti-American and criminal actions. The summary of the charges is listed below. The full accounting of, explanations of, and result of the investigations are in the document attached to the article. Not a single one of these criminals is even close to being a Whistleblower. This is another example of the GOP picking up a term after going after real whistleblowers and applying it to criminals that they need to bolster a lie.

"The Security Division opened a security investigation regarding Mr. Gloss in August 2021, after receiving a referral from the FBI's Washington Field Office. On March 30, 2022, Mr. Gloss's security clearance was suspended based on security concerns pursuant to three Adjudicative Guidelines: Guideline A " Allegiance to the United States, Guideline E " Personal Conduct, and Guideline J " Criminal Conduct"

"Brett Gloss's TS security clearance was revoked by the FBI on May 3, 2023. A copy of Mr. Gloss's notification letter is enclosed"

"The Security Division opened a security investigation regarding Mr. Allen in October 2021, after receiving a referral from the FBI's Charlotte Field Office. On January 19, 2022, Mr. Allen's security clearance was suspended based on security concerns pursuant to National Security Adjudicative Guideline A " Allegiance to the United States."

"Mr. Allen's Top Secret (TS) security clearance was revoked by the FBI on May 3, 2023. A copy of Mr. Allen's notification letter is enclosed"

"The Security Division opened a security investigation regarding Mr. Friend in September 2022, after receiving a referral from the FBI's Jacksonville Field Office. On September 16, 2022, Mr. Friend's security clearance was suspended based on security concerns pursuant to two Guidelines, Guideline E " Personal Conduct and Guideline K " Handling Protected Information."

"Mr. Friend's Top Secret (TS) security clearance was revoked by the FBI on May 16, 2023. A copy of Mr. Friend's notification letter is enclosed"

#1 | Posted by YAV at 2023-05-18 05:04 PM | Reply

Uh oh.

#2 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2023-05-18 05:19 PM | Reply

He was so loyal to trump he was willing to kill congress.

that's messed up.

I wonder how many other people on trumps behalf tried to get congress killed?

#3 | Posted by Tor at 2023-05-18 05:21 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Turns out these liars were all paid for by Trump.

#4 | Posted by YAV at 2023-05-18 05:46 PM | Reply

This story is blowing up right now.
It is hot!

#5 | Posted by YAV at 2023-05-18 05:46 PM | Reply

"The first three of these witnesses whose testimony Jordan received were not really "whistleblowers," but disaffected former FBI employees receiving financial backing from former President Trump's ally and advisor Kash Patel. None of them have been given whistleblower protection status by the Department of Justice."

#6 | Posted by YAV at 2023-05-18 05:47 PM | Reply

Jordan's also refusing to let the Democrats see any of the "testimony" or "evidence" of and from these "witnesses" in direct violation of the rules.

#7 | Posted by YAV at 2023-05-18 05:49 PM | Reply

Guideline A " Allegiance to the United States

It seems to me this should be the easiest thing to fulfill, being you are a federal agent.

Oh well.

#8 | Posted by truthhurts at 2023-05-18 05:49 PM | Reply

Are these the same FBI agents who failed to investigate the drunken gang rapist on the Supreme Court?

#9 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2023-05-18 08:51 PM | Reply

Of course lefties accept this without even a remote hint of skepticism. That these agents happen to be whistleblowers doesn't even raise an eyebrow.

#10 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-05-18 09:16 PM | Reply

They aren't whistleblowers. They aren't even close to being whistleblowers. Under no sense of law are they whistleblowers.

You are projecting the way you treat every piece of right-wing garbage as gospel on everyone else.

You are a firehose of nonsense and --------.

#11 | Posted by YAV at 2023-05-18 09:33 PM | Reply

#10 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Now do the Durham report. Oh, wait. You already blindly follow Durham's conclusions without skepticism.

Hypocrite.

#12 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2023-05-18 09:39 PM | Reply

They aren't whistleblowers. They aren't even close to being whistleblowers. Under no sense of law are they whistleblowers.
You are projecting the way you treat every piece of right-wing garbage as gospel on everyone else.
You are a firehose of nonsense and --------.
#11 | POSTED BY YAV

Just to be sure he doesn't choose ignorance...JEFFJ, the above is aimed at you, hypocrite.

Swallow it.

#13 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2023-05-18 09:40 PM | Reply

" Now do the Durham report. Oh, wait. You already blindly follow Durham's conclusions without skepticism. "

I give the Durham report the same credence I give the Mueller report.

#14 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-05-18 09:41 PM | Reply

Jeez, Yav. Calm down. I didn't accuse the FBI of wrongdoing on this. I also don't take their explanation at 100% face value either. Maybe their actions are justified. Maybe not.

#15 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-05-18 09:43 PM | Reply

#15

Stop choosing ignorance and maybe you'd get a clue.

When you finally do...

Swallow it.

#16 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2023-05-18 09:44 PM | Reply

Rstytrombonebeach,

Please remove your brown stained teeth from my ankle.

#17 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-05-18 10:07 PM | Reply

#17

Not until you stop choosing ignorance, hypocrite.

#18 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2023-05-18 10:27 PM | Reply

What have I said that is hypocritical?

#19 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-05-18 10:33 PM | Reply

#19

Learn words and read #12 as many times as you need to swallow crucial context.

You're like a baby being tossed into a pool. LOL

#20 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2023-05-18 10:36 PM | Reply

#20 I responded to it with #14.

#21 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-05-18 10:42 PM | Reply

On topic, these agents are claiming this is retaliation.

#22 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-05-18 10:46 PM | Reply

GOP "FBI Politicization" Hearing Features Witnesses Paid by Trump Adviser.
newrepublic.com

Whoops!

#23 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2023-05-18 10:59 PM | Reply

20 I responded to it with #14.
#21 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Fascinating to see you think you did when clearly you didn't.

Lulz

#24 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2023-05-18 11:02 PM | Reply

Representative Jim Jordan admitted on Thursday that two FBI whistleblowers testifying in front of the House Judiciary Committee were paid by one of Donald Trump's advisors, Kash Patel.

Whoops!!

#25 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2023-05-18 11:03 PM | Reply

You accused me of taking the Durham report without any skepticism as if that made me a hypocrite for entertaining the notion that the FBI's actions here might be retaliation because their actions warrant some skepticism.

As if that was actually some kind of argument. It's weak sauce.

I responded that I hold the Durham report in the same regard I hold the Mueller report, which is quite consistent.

#26 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-05-18 11:05 PM | Reply

I've read transcripts of parts of their testimony. If they are telling the truth it sure does sound like retaliation and persecution. Prior to this incident it sounds like these agents had a clean record. Why would they subject themselves to all of this including the loss of pay and benefits as well as public ostracization by a powerful agency that deals with a compliant press? Their testimony is under oath so they are at risk of perjury as well. So if they are in fact lying it would be nice if someone like Yav could point it out.

#27 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-05-19 10:25 AM | Reply

The Yahoo article is dry one sided in its reporting -the FBI's version of events almost exclusively.

#28 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-05-19 10:38 AM | Reply

One of Friend's biggest concerns was the excessive use of SWAT. I would hope that SWAT would be a choice of last resort and that lefties would be very concerned by any usage of SWAT.

#29 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-05-19 10:39 AM | Reply

Will this committee be investigating Ted Cruz for targeting anheiser Busch and Dylan Mulvaney?

#30 | Posted by truthhurts at 2023-05-19 10:42 AM | Reply

Given the stated aims of the 1/6 insurrectionists was a violent overthrow of the us government I would argue a strong police presence during any and all arrests was appropriate

In fact summary execution seems reasonable to me as well

#31 | Posted by truthhurts at 2023-05-19 10:46 AM | Reply

#31. Surely you realize that hundreds of those people walked through an open door, walked around for a while and then left, right?

BTW it's people like you are why we have a bill of rights and due process in the first place.

#32 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-05-19 10:51 AM | Reply

Those dead can be considered a bloody sacrifice on the tree of liberty

There were no innocents there that day.

A lot of stupid people yes (take that woman who was interviewed during the insurrection whining about being pepper sprayed and giving her name while proudly claiming she was there for a revolution). Stupid but not innocent

The alternative will be ------- (the sexual predator) getting rid of the bill of rights anyway so at least we can go down fighting

#33 | Posted by truthhurts at 2023-05-19 10:56 AM | Reply

" Surely you realize that hundreds of those people walked through an open door"

Before or after breaching the police line?

And did these folks miss the smashed windows, or did they just think it was part of the effects?

#34 | Posted by Danforth at 2023-05-19 11:03 AM | Reply

" Those dead can be considered a bloody sacrifice on the tree of liberty "

We don't mow down protestors. Tear gas, flash grenades, rubber bullets, etc.

#35 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-05-19 11:26 AM | Reply

#34. I'm not saying they are innocent.

#36 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-05-19 11:27 AM | Reply

" We don't mow down protestors."

What about folks at an assassination attempt?

#37 | Posted by Danforth at 2023-05-19 11:29 AM | Reply

#37. Depends. Sometimes the use of lethal force is warranted. Generally speaking for crowd control it's a method of absolute last resort when non lethal means are very effective.

#38 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-05-19 11:49 AM | Reply

On topic, these agents are claiming this is retaliation.

#22 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Of course they are.

They are lucky they aren't under arrest.

They participated in Jan 6th and obstructed the investigation. One agent (Friend) even did an "interview with a Russian news agency without approval from the FBI's office of public affairs".

WTF?

#39 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-05-19 01:19 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"If they are telling the truth it sure does sound like retaliation and persecution."

So they actually have whistleblower protection?

I don't see that anywhere. But I do keep seeing them being called "alleged whistleblowers".

They sound more like disgruntled employees who were fired for cause to me.

#40 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-05-19 01:26 PM | Reply

" Depends. Sometimes the use of lethal force is warranted."

I was specifically talking about multiple assassination attempts.

#41 | Posted by Danforth at 2023-05-19 01:39 PM | Reply

We have the FBI's version of scents and these agents' version of events. Not sure which side to believe.

#42 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-05-19 01:42 PM | Reply

#41. If secret service is protecting an asset and a mob is charging and non lethal may not get the job done than in that hypothetical the use of deadly force is warranted.

#43 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-05-19 01:43 PM | Reply

@#10 ... Of course lefties accept this without even a remote hint of skepticism. ...

Apparently, the Democrats were skeptical and asked Rep Jordan for evidence. Rep Jordan apparently refused their request.


#44 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-05-19 03:41 PM | Reply

FBI Says GOP's Whistleblowers Interfered With, Refused To Participate In Jan. 6 Investigations

www.huffpost.com

... Not long after telling his supervisors he wouldn't help with Capitol riot cases, [Christopher Dunham, FBI assistant director] wrote, [Steve] Friend "entered FBI space and downloaded documents from FBI computer systems to an unauthorized removable flash drive" and also "publicly released sensitive FBI information on his personal social media accounts without authorization." ...

That does not look like a whistleblower's actions to me, it looks more like a criminal's actions to me.

#45 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-05-19 03:47 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

For anyone looking for balanced reporting, this article does a pretty good job:

thehill.com

#46 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-05-19 05:14 PM | Reply

Anyone who bought the big lie from trump should be automatically kicked out of government jobs. It's not partisan. They're just too stupid to be trusted with public service.

In the FBI in particular, these are fools who sided with a russian puppet instead of protecting their country and upholding their oath to defend the constitution.

#47 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2023-05-19 05:27 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

We have the FBI's version of scents and these agents' version of events. Not sure which side to believe.

#42 | Posted by BellRinger

The side not echoed on the TV network who just paid out 800 million for intentionally lying to their viewers.

Duh.

#48 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2023-05-19 05:28 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#46 ... this article does a pretty good job: ...

For starters... it seems to skip the evidence cited in comment #45.


#49 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-05-19 05:58 PM | Reply

"You are not entitled to it": Jordan hearing blows up after he withholds "whistleblower" testimony
www.salon.com

...The "weaponization" subcommittee hearing began with testimony from self-proclaimed "whistleblowers" from the FBI, who claim that the bureau engaged in corrupt, political misconduct.

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., however, called out the credibility of FBI agent Stephen Friend, who had his security clearance revoked by the bureau.

"You... claim that your top secret security clearance was improperly revoked. Yet an independent investigation concluded that you demonstrated a number of security concerns, which included that you refused to execute a court-ordered arrest warrant, and when you downloaded documents from intelligence systems to an unauthorized removable flash drive," Wasserman Schultz said.

"The cherry on top could be your unauthorized recording of executive management, which, as I'm sure you know, violates Florida law, along with your unsanctioned interviews with Sputnik News, established by the Russian government in 2014 and fully owned by the Kremlin and Putin's cronies," she continued.

"I think it's clear who is weaponizing government," she added....

[emphasis mine]



#50 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-05-19 06:34 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

"I think it's clear who is weaponizing government," she added....

One does wonder how long the Republic can withstand the combined Russian and Republicans attempts to overthrow it.

#51 | Posted by snoofy at 2023-05-19 06:39 PM | Reply

Jim Jordan's FBI Whistleblower Hearing Descends Into Chaos
www.newsweek.com

...On Thursday, the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, which Jordan chairs, held a hearing to examine alleged abuses within the FBI. The House panel heard from two suspended FBI agents and one former agent, who claimed that their employer retaliated against them for speaking out about the bureau.

The FBI denied those claims. The bureau told Newsweek that it "has not and will not retaliate against individuals who make protected whistleblower disclosures."

The tumultuous hearing was rocky from the start. Just after the three witnesses made their opening statements before committee members, Ranking Member Stacey Plaskett asked Jordan why the transcripts of the witness testimonies made to Republicans before the hearing were not being shared with the panel's Democratic members.

"We can talk about the testimony but right now you're not getting the testimony," Jordan responded after a back-and-forth. When Representative Plaskett pressed if the testimony would be handed over at a later date, Jordan refused to answer and began the questioning period of the hearing instead....


Wait, what?!?!?

Rep Jordan seems to be refusing to share witness testimony with the committee members who are not Republicans?


More from the article...
... Throughout the hearing, Democratic committee members repeatedly called out Jordan for violating House rules by withholding the evidence gathered with the other side, arguing that the minority is entitled to the same information as the majority. ...

"Why does that not apply?" Goldman asked Jordan, who said the committee had the "prerogative" to decide and that the whistleblower did not want the Democratic members to have the testimony. Goldman told Jordan that, "the whistleblower doesn't make committee rules," before the chairman pushed on with the hearing.

So, this is starting to look like yet another farce committee meeting chaired by Rep Jordan.




#52 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-05-19 06:54 PM | Reply

This could be fairly adhudicated if we had a fair and impartial Supreme Court instead of the GQP insult to Lady Justice. Republicans hate democracy and those who claim otherwise are just obvious liars. I don't have an ounce of respect for anyone who still identifies as a Republican; even the one's I am related to.

#53 | Posted by danni at 2023-05-21 12:13 PM | Reply

I don't have an ounce of respect for anyone who still identifies as a Republican; even the one's I am related to.

#53 | POSTED BY DANNI

It is quite interesting to me how successfully we have been divided as a nation. Even father against son and husband against wife and brother against brother.

The hostile nations that managed this and Trumpers who supported them should be very proud of what they have accomplished. Nothing has ever divided us against each other so well since the civil war. It's a wonder that we are able to accomplish anything at all these days.

"We have met the enemy and it is us."

#54 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-05-21 12:24 PM | Reply

The FBI denied those claims. The bureau told Newsweek that it "has not and will not retaliate against individuals who make protected whistleblower disclosures."

To me that is the question.

Are they actually "protected whistleblowers" or just disgruntled employees fired for cause?

#55 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-05-21 12:27 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2023 World Readable

Drudge Retort