Advertisement
Texas House Committee Recommends Impeachment for Paxton
The Republican-controlled Texas House may vote to decide whether the state's attorney general should be impeached and removed from office. A Texas House committee voted unanimously to recommend impeachment for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
johnny_hotsauce
Joined 2006/04/02Visited 2023/05/29
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Texas House Committee Recommends Impeachment for Paxton (17 comments) ...
Disney Cancels $1 Billion Campus in Florida (113 comments) ...
Student Suspended for Recording Teacher saying Racist Slur (177 comments) ...
Responsible Gun Owner Shoots Child Playing Hide & Seek (1 comments) ...
Florida Woman Forced To Birth Baby With No Kidneys (8 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
The recommendation can be found here. capitol.texas.gov Much of this about Paxton was already known before he won re-election last November. One might hope Texas voters might collectively take a look at themselves and ask themselves how they could elect a criminal who is completely unsuited for public service but history tells us they probably won't.
#1 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2023-05-26 12:44 AM | Reply
This took how many years?
#2 | Posted by Sycophant at 2023-05-26 10:42 AM | Reply
This took how many years? #2 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT
RIGHT! He was indicted by the feds in 2015 and still hasn't went to trial.
#3 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2023-05-26 11:49 AM | Reply
Please. Crime just makes the republican party lover a leader more.
#4 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2023-05-26 08:52 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
Crime just makes the republican party lover a leader more.
#4 | Posted by SpeakSoft
Bigotry doesn't like information so let me help you with this....
In an unanimous decision, a Republican-led House investigative committee that spent months quietly looking into Paxton recommended impeaching the state's top lawyer on 20 articles, including bribery, unfitness for office and abuse of public trust.
.................................... let's repeat this part.
In an unanimous decision, a Republican-led House investigative committee .
** I know how you people love to abuse language and will attempt to indict me as a firm supporter of paxton for simply pointing out the fallacy of your biased remark...so go ahead....do your thing....and feel proud to make up all the ---- you want.
#5 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2023-05-27 11:02 AM | Reply
I guess the republican led committee could have paid off 51 agents to lie about the charges.
or perhaps intimidate or pay off corporate media to "lose it" or blame it on russia....
talk about bipartisan...
have a wonderful day.
#6 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2023-05-27 11:32 AM | Reply
One might hope Texas voters might collectively take a look at themselves and ask themselves how they could elect a criminal who is completely unsuited for public service
#1 | POSTED BY JOHNNY_HOTSAUCE
Not just Texas, but the entire MAGA movement.
#7 | Posted by Zed at 2023-05-27 11:44 AM | Reply
calling a republican led committee that called for impeachment of a long time republican MAGA...
is as stupid and illiterate as the despicable and worthless male senator from new york calling a 9-0 supreme
court vote a MAGA verdict.
just like the other terms and ignorant "definitions"...time for leftists to get a new playbook...
I bet you can use the one from 'the view'....
#8 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2023-05-27 12:13 PM | Reply
#8 | POSTED BY SHRIMPTACODAN
You seem to be reacting to the use of the term "MAGA". Like you're ashamed.
That's actually a very good sign.
#9 | Posted by Zed at 2023-05-27 12:25 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
" Bigotry doesn't like information so let me help you with this...."
You left out the part where he was indicted SEVEN YEARS ago.
You know, the salient part. SpeakSoftly's claim is accurate.
#10 | Posted by Danforth at 2023-05-27 01:26 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
#5 | Posted by shrimptacodan at
Get back to us when your party rejects the leader that literally attempted a fascist coup.
#11 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2023-05-27 03:03 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
If there were any chance that paxton would be replaced by an ethical republican or democrat he wouldn't be impeached.
#12 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2023-05-27 03:08 PM | Reply
#5 | POSTED BY SHRIMPTACODAN
It's really incredible how MAGA morons will view the corrupt POSes in their party as purely partisan victims while doing nothing but making up partisan nonsense about Dems.
Lie to smear good people while lying to protect and deflect for bad people. All while being "Chreestian."
#13 | Posted by jpw at 2023-05-27 07:18 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
#13 | Posted by jpw
that's not even close to what I said. I didn't say he was guilty or innocent...so just like so many others, you lie to make some
illiterate point with no basis in fact.. you worthless hack.
which proves that you're what I've known for some time.... a despicable liar.
and the gop majority house voted to impeach paxton which makes you and the other bigots look even dumber.
#14 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2023-05-28 12:09 AM | Reply
and the gop majority house voted to impeach paxton
Now they just need 9 GOP Senators to vote to convict and they have something.
#15 | Posted by REDIAL at 2023-05-28 12:24 AM | Reply
" illiterate point with no basis in fact.. you worthless hack."
Hey dumbfuq, why have you ignored the fact Paxton was indicted SEVEN YEARS AGO?
Are you sure you should be throwing stones from that glass house?
#16 | Posted by Danforth at 2023-05-28 12:59 AM | Reply
How bad do you have to be to be tossed from office in Texas, a state that still honors Cruz and Gohmert.
#17 | Posted by Hughmass at 2023-05-28 06:29 AM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2023 World Readable
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2023 World Readable