Sexual assault happens in high school. It's unfortunate and shouldn't. But it does.

There are procedures in place schools follow in such an event.

The administration removing the student from one school and transferring them to another is the proper procedure until there's an established pattern of assault by the student.

The father's anger at the student for assaulting his daughter is justified.

But gathering a mob and demanding the school board take special measures simply because this one time the assailant isn't CisHet is ridiculous. He needed to be arrested so he could go cool off.

I know BillJohnson/BellRinger will ignore reality to maintain their feigned outrage.

They have nothing but lies anger and Rightwing propaganda.

.

It's gross injustice it went this far in the first place.
#1 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Yea. Too bad the school district didn't allow the father and the mob to beat the shht out of that kid in order to sate their bloodlust.

You're firmly in the category of people who support mob justice.

Probably why you defend the 1/6 insurrection tooth and nail.

are you saying there is no punishment for high school sexual assault?

You're more than welcome to look it up.

I'm assuming you were hoping the kid faced prison time? Perhaps would have liked to see the father beat them to death?

Just move the kid around until he has managed to rape a young girl in every school?

He didn't rape her. You're posting hyperbole. You're a troll and a waste of time.

here in America because the justice system is broken.

You can always move to wherever they're executing high school student for being sexually aggressive.

The next time there's a thread on the Catholic cover up, I recommend you refrain from posting.
#11 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Bill. You support adults raping children?

Or are you saying you feel like children should be tried as adults.

Why didn't the father of this girl seek legal recourse?

Why is this case of sexual assault between teenagers getting more attention than the rest?

Bill.

The assault isn't the story.

Others you'd never have heard of it occurring.

Why didn't the father pursue legal action?

Robson is so worried about women, he votes for politicians who time and again, vote to strip them of their freedoms.

Why should he have to?

Because his daughter was sexually assaulted and that would be his legal option to pursue.

Shouldn't the school pursue legal action for sexual assault?

The school wasn't sexually assaulted. The incident was between two student, not faculty related. The school district followed established protocol.

I asked this of other posters. No one answered. What would you like to see happen to a teenager, in high school, who sexually assaults another student?

Statistics I've seen on Google say 1 in 10 girls and 1 in 25 boys are sexually assaulted in k-12.

I've never seen any other student on student sexual assault case receive this much attention.

It's not the school who gets to decide who stands trial as an adult, that would be a judge's job.
#22 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTURDS

Which is why it's the fathers responsibility to hire a lawyer and take this to court, for a judge to decide.

Not, form a mob and attack the PTA meeting.

The school board covered up the incident

How many of you ignorant morons are going to repeat this?

Do you think being ignorant is an acceptable excuse?

The school followed established procedures. Which was set up by the department of education.

The school doesn't take the kid to court.

That's on the father. The fathers legal recourse is to hire a lawyer and take the kid, kids family, to court.

He may win a fine. Get a restraining order. Possibly get prison time for the assailant.

His illegal recourse is to gather a fkkking mob and become irate at a PTA meeting.

This is what's wrong with MAGAts. They're unable to think and simply get mad and violent.

You're all mentally unstable.

He was wearing a skirt.

Who the fkkk cares.

Get a fkkking life, grandpa.

Probably because of this...

That was rhetorical.

This entire thing is transphobia.

Nothing more.

But. I do appreciate the article. It's spot on about this being nothing more than pandering to transphobes.

Like billjohnson BellRinger lfthndturds Robson ...

That comment was in response to Sycophant flatly stating that this kid isn't transgender.
#40 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Again. It's 2023.

Wearing a dress doesn't have to signify anything other than challenging the norms.

Being an ally.

Being a cross dresser.

Having fun.

Also. It was pointed out up thread they were boyfriend and girlfriend? Is this true?

If so. This is all the more ridiculous.

The pardon of a father who was arrested when trying to hold a school board accountable for their cover up of his daughter being sexually assaulted is transphobia? You are effed in the head with that take.
#47 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Shut up transphobe.

The fathers actions were out of line.

The school district followed protocol.

The only reason this case is getting any attention is because of transphobia.

If it's not, then perhaps you can tell me why no other sexual assaults are being covered? Why other fathers haven't gathered mobs and attacked PTA meetings in the past.

Actions like gathering mobs were more common in the past when it was a Black boy and a White girl.

Go look at yourself in a mirror. You'll see a transphobic person whose ability to reason is being clouded by hate.

I bet.

Easier than admitting this is being blown out of proportion because there's a possibility the assailant is transgender.

It's everyone else who's wrong.

When asked about whether any incidents had been reported the school had an absolute obligation to answer truthfully.

Citation necessary that they were obligated to make any statement at all.

Trans had literally NOTHING to do with it.
#53 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT

Hasn't stopped the GOP from framing it as a trans issue.

They know it's gonna get transphobic voters to support their demagoguery.

His daughter was sexually assaulted by a male in the girls bathroom. Imposing a rule that any male can claim to be trans and have unfettered access to those spaces surely was what was in his mind.

You are a dumb fkkking, transphobic, piece of shht.

His daughter was sexually assaulted by a male in the girls bathroom.

Has nothing to do with whether transgender people should have access the bathroom of their preference.

The rest of your emotional dump belongs in the trash.

what would stop any boy claiming to be trans from entering girls bathrooms?

Being a boy.

Not being into sexual assault.

Being raised correctly.

What's preventing you from breaking into the girl's bathroom?

The law??

Cause, holy shht man.

If that the only reason you're not raping women, you're fkkked!

After the father exposed the school administration for transferring the boy to cover up the attack.

They weren't covering up anything.

Odd how you and BellRinger post the same debunked claims.

Over and over again.

~I>The point for me is this shows the conflict between parental rights and public schools arrogance.
#62 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

The father has all the rights in the world to pursue legal action.

The daughter knows the assailant.

Go hire a lawyer.

Bill. Stop excusing the fathers actions.

The mob is inexcusable.

Despite your best efforts to ignore and excuse it.

Thanks to liberal madness the boy believed himself entitled to enter girls bathrooms.
#64 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

You are re tar did.

What law was broken?
#68 | POSTED BY ONENUT

Assault.

Specifically sexual assault.

It's not illegal for a man to enter a woman's restroom.

It's illegal to assault someone. Regardless of location.

Like Sycophant pointed out. The issue is the assault.

The rest of it, is politics.

Specifically transphobia.

I don't know
#70 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

You should have just stopped there.

Because that's the only correct thing you've posted this entire thread.

bill is a jerkj sockpuppet

There are so many similarities in their posting habits, their debate tactics, their trolling style, their threats and their incessant lying, it seems highly likely.

Let's play a little game of what if ...
#78 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

That's pretty much what all your posts are since you aggressively ignore reality.

No matter what you post it doesn't change the facts.

You know what facts are?

Not based on your posts.

Facts:

One student assaulted another.

The school district followed protocol.

The father hired a mob looking for a fight.

This has been explained to you. Several times. You ignore it and post nothing but emotional nonsense about feelings.

Fkkk your feelings.

The school acted accordingly.

End of story.

What are parental rights?
#81 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

Apparently, it's the right to form a mob and attack the school board.

I thought the police conduct was appropriate.
#82 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

This post brought to you by the same poster who supports cops shooting Black people in the back.

Are you so lacking in empathy that your u cannot acknowledge that weighed on his frame of mind?

WTF does empathy have to do with it?

Oh, I see. The father is White and a Republican.

Let's give him all sorts of considerations for breaking the law we wouldn't afford others.

Thanks for your double standards.

Hypocrite.

His current alias can't imagine being this father in this situation.
#87 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Eberly, being a father, one of only two on the DR apparently, based on that statement.

Would have definitely gathered an irate mob to attack the PTA meeting.

He wouldn't have hired a lawyer to seek legal recourse.

Or gone and talked with school administrators to figure out the full scope of action.

No. He would have gotten really angry at the school board and would have taken a mob of angry people with him to get justice.

What's the justice you'd be seeking by taking such actions?

Beat up the principal?

Find the kid who assaulted your daughter and lynch him?

Tell me Eberly, only father on the DR, what were you seeking when you took a mob of angry people to the PTA meeting with you?

I really have no clue what you are saying.
#96 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Find someone to explain it to you.

WHAT legal recourse does the father have?

You asked this up thread and I answered it.

Let's try again. Dumb dumb.

His daughter was assaulted. Sexually.

What's the legal recourse for assault. Sexual. Look it up genius.

he was expecting the authorities to act.

Not without filing assault charges. With the cops. With a lawyer.

they hid

The school? With camouflage?

The kid? In witness protection??

Wtf are you lying for.

sent the child to another school.

So, they followed protocol.

its about transgender alright.
#99 | POSTED BY ONENUT

Because that's good politics.

Makes idiots, like you, fall in line.

too much anger
#98 | POSTED BY EBERLY

And you've only been back a few days.

It's not the schools responsibility to take legal action for the father.

It the assailant was a teacher, then the school would be culpable.