Neutral is truthful.

#1 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

No it is certainly not

One side says sky is blue other side say sky is yellow. Neutrality is not truth. One side is truth and one side is lie

Now do that with

2020 election
Reason for Biden impeachment
Stealing classified documents
January 6
Etc

Neutrality often serves the fascists purpose

Neutrality often serves the fascists purpose"
And subjectivity often serves what exactly?

#7 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

Reality is not subjective.

Reporting without pointing out the lie gives validity to the lie-see the past 30 years of reporting.

The sky is not yellow.

The sky is blue.

When one side says the sky is yellow, they are lying.

It is journalism's responsibility to report reality-that the side saying the sky is yellow is lying.

"One side says sky is blue other side say sky is yellow. Neutrality is not truth. One side is truth and one side is lie"
Neutrality would be reporting what both sides were saying. If there were conclusions to be drawn, it would be drawn by the viewers.
You seem to be saying that only one side should be presented by the media. Am I interpreting you correctly?

#6 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

I am saying that presenting lies as anything other than lies is legitimizing the lies.

By legitimizing lies you are actually tilting the field to the liars.

That isn't neutrality.

This is so obvious it makes me wonder why you don't understand it.

Example of how it should be done:

Biden says the sky is blue, ------- (the sexual predator) says the sky is yellow. You can look outside and see the color of the sky. When you were in kindergarten or at latest 1st grade you were taught what is blue and what is yellow. As you can see with your own eyes and we can confirm, the sky is blue. ------- (the sexual predator) is lying to you.

THAT is truthful.

As opposed to:

Biden says Sky is blue

------- (the sexual predator) says the sky is yellow

You decide

The color blind, the regular blind and the magat stupid will believe the sky is or may be yellow.

THAT is NOT truth, but may be considered neutral

This is a dumb thread, as most progressive ones are.
Until I hear a progressive/liberal media outlet report that a man is physically incapable of being a woman (which is fact), they have no credibility with me.

#43 | POSTED BY BOAZ

See boaz, this is a YOU problem and not a we problem.

You see, the experts, you know the one's who study the matter have concluded, based on many studies, lots and lots of data, that gender and sex are different things. I get it, you cannot accept that. Many people can't. But that does not make them not facts. You are not entitled to facts that are not facts. Your opinion is wrong. Period full stop. You do not get to define gender vs sex. Society does. and society has weighed in on the matter and using reason and the scientific method has concluded that gender and sex are different things.

I get it truth hurts.