Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Sunday, September 17, 2023

With 24/7 tutors and lots of hand-holding, high-end consultants are taking the admissions race to the next level.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article...

... Sooner or later, every parent asks Christopher Rim the same question: What will it take to get my kid into Harvard or Yale?

His answer: $750,000.

That's Rim's going rate for advice on landing a coveted spot in the Ivy League for students who want to start college prep in the 7th grade. The price is more than twice what it can cost to actually attend one of those eight elite schools.

But, for those who can pay, Rim and his team at New York-based Command Education will serve as a sort of white-glove college concierge service " "mentors" who will groom an overachiever, prod a slacker, finetune a B+ here or an A- there, curate extracurriculars and otherwise buff a high-school CV to a high Princetonian gloss.

Elite universities have long been stocked with children of the rich. But as admissions mania spirals " only about 3% of applicants get into Harvard these days " the ultra-wealthy are taking the win-at-all-costs gamesmanship to five-star heights. Enter a new wave of luxury college consulting services that all but guarantee its clients will get into one of their dream schools. All-inclusive packages " sometimes costing well into the six figures " can start prepping kids before they even enter high school.

"These are very savvy business people and families " money is no object for our clients,'' Rim, 28, said. "Frankly, if they never have a job or go to college, they're going to live better than most people. What we're doing is building motivation for students that have every resource."

It's hardly news that wealthy parents try to buy every edge for their kids. But the new class of high-end consultants " think McKinsey & Co. for 17-year-old clients " is more evidence of the lengths to which people will go to gain access to elite institutions (the Varsity Blues admissions scandal showed how, for some, that can include breaking the law.)
Murky Process

The backdrop for all of this, of course, is the age-old anxiety about getting into an elite school. The college application process has gotten even murkier in recent years, as acceptance rates plummet and parents search for anything that can give their kids an advantage. ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-09-17 12:36 AM | Reply

@#1 ... Sooner or later, every parent asks Christopher Rim the same question: What will it take to get my kid into Harvard or Yale?

His answer: $750,000. ...

So... $750,000 seems to be the current Affirmative Action?

I wonder how SCOTUS might view this?

#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-09-17 12:38 AM | Reply

Makes you wonder how much they spend on tutoring during the time at Harvard.

Or the donations to ensure the "grades" are properly "graded"...

#3 | Posted by jpw at 2023-09-17 01:16 AM | Reply

Funny thing is that the SATs were meant to prevent this sort of thing from happening. An objective measure of an applicant's educational attainment that was less susceptible to societal biases. But the SAT scores didn't produce the desired results, with Asians and other undesirable groups scoring higher.

So colleges got rid of the SATs and are going back to the biased admission process. But now they're going to place their thumb on the scale, with SCOTUS's blessing, to get the result that they want.

But they won't go with an income based admission method that the vast majority of Americans would support and actually result in a more racially and socially equitable society. For reasons ...

#4 | Posted by censored at 2023-09-17 09:22 AM | Reply

"Funny thing is that the SATs were meant to prevent this sort of thing from happening."

At best they provided window dressing that this kind of thing wasn't happening so openly.

"The College Board also states that the SAT, in combination with high school grade point average (GPA), provides a better indicator of success in college than high school grades alone, as measured by college freshman GPA. Various studies conducted over the lifetime of the SAT show a statistically significant increase in correlation of high school grades and college freshman grades when the SAT is factored in."

Which immediately creates a market to teach the test.
Which immediately creates the situation where only those with means can afford to send their kids to an SAT class.
Fun fact: I taught a SAT class for a while. Every kid in the class was already in the 1200-1300 range and hoping to get into the 1400-1500 range.

Anyway, the "standards" in standardized testing reflect the standards of the dominant culture. That notion probably wasn't very well developed in 1926, and I would suggest the push towards Assimilation (i.e., Standardization) was much greater in American culture in 1926, prior to the adoption of Civil Rights. Back when we were an industrial powerhouse of manufacturing reliant on low skilled uneducated workers, compared to now when we are an industrial powerhouse of the high-tech economy which requires highly skilled educated workers.

#5 | Posted by snoofy at 2023-09-17 01:32 PM | Reply

#5.

Fair enough, but the admissions process has to be based on something if we're not going to go with pure lottery.

Short of including an income component, the admissions will always be gamed by those with the most resources. Having income set-asides in admissions, particularly if they match income in society, means that at least we would have some measure of fairness there.

Still not entirely clear why colleges are so opposed. Maybe worried about losing alumni financial support.

#6 | Posted by censored at 2023-09-17 04:19 PM | Reply

-I wonder how SCOTUS might view this?

They should be embarrassed at it considering most of them went to a similar school with similar realities attached to it.

It's a good reason to devalue a degree from Harvard.

#7 | Posted by eberly at 2023-09-17 05:42 PM | Reply

Unkle Thomas would think it's a great idea!

Any kind of graft and privilege is good with him.

#8 | Posted by Corky at 2023-09-17 06:03 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I'm not surprised they rig admissions SAT's and scholarships.

#9 | Posted by Tor at 2023-09-17 10:33 PM | Reply

Harvard only accepts around 6% of the highly qualified people who apply, it is as elitist as it gets.
Education in a meritocracy tells those who are not at the top of the scale that they are not full members of the American family and so don't deserve a good education that can get them a get living.

#10 | Posted by Hughmass at 2023-09-18 06:33 AM | Reply

I wonder how SCOTUS might view this?

#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-09-17 12:38 AM | Reply | Flag:

SCOTUS answer was quite clear..."We now accept Venmo"

#11 | Posted by Nixon at 2023-09-18 07:27 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

GPA is stupid to use as a measurement.

I went to a Oklahoma high school graduation in a small town. 18 Valedictorians in a class of 50. They all gave speeches and most could barely read from the paper in their hands.

#12 | Posted by Sycophant at 2023-09-18 11:20 AM | Reply

All Ivy League schools should be shut down.

They get too many rich lunatics in one place and gives them the semblance of legitimacy.

#13 | Posted by tres_flechas at 2023-09-18 06:27 PM | Reply

Somebody just watched Leeja Miller

#14 | Posted by truthhurts at 2023-09-18 06:28 PM | Reply

Harvard only accepts around 6% of the highly qualified people who apply, it is as elitist as it gets.

#10 | POSTED BY HUGHMASS

3.14 percent at last counting.

#15 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2023-09-19 06:49 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2023 World Readable

Drudge Retort