Advertisement
'I Was Addicted to Social Media -- Now I'm Suing Big Tech'
Hundreds of families are suing some of the world's biggest technology companies - who, they say, knowingly expose children to harmful products.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
LampLighter
Joined 2013/04/13Visited 2023/12/08
Status: user
MORE STORIES
US Risks Being Dragged Into Third War (10 comments) ...
Jailbroken AI Chatbots Can Jailbreak Other Chatbots (8 comments) ...
Turning a Page, Greece and Turkey Agree to Mend Ties (12 comments) ...
Georgia GOP Seems to Defy Judge in Producing New Map (8 comments) ...
How Trump would build his loyalty-first Cabinet (2 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
More from the article...
... Taylor Little's addiction was social media, an addiction that led to suicide attempts and years of depression. Taylor, who's now 21 and uses the pronoun "they", describes the tech companies as "big, bad monsters". The companies, Taylor believes, knowingly put into children's hands highly addictive and damaging products. Which is why Taylor and hundreds of other American families are suing four of the biggest tech companies in the world. Harmful by design The lawsuit against Meta - the owner of Facebook and Instagram - plus TikTok, Google and Snap Inc, the owner of Snapchat, is one of the largest ever mounted in Silicon Valley. The plaintiffs include ordinary families and school districts from across the US. They claim that the platforms are harmful by design. ...
Taylor, who's now 21 and uses the pronoun "they", describes the tech companies as "big, bad monsters".
The companies, Taylor believes, knowingly put into children's hands highly addictive and damaging products.
Which is why Taylor and hundreds of other American families are suing four of the biggest tech companies in the world. Harmful by design
The lawsuit against Meta - the owner of Facebook and Instagram - plus TikTok, Google and Snap Inc, the owner of Snapchat, is one of the largest ever mounted in Silicon Valley.
The plaintiffs include ordinary families and school districts from across the US.
They claim that the platforms are harmful by design. ...
#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-11-20 06:33 PM | Reply
@#1 ... harmful by design ...
imo, absolutely.
The social media sites seem to be designed to get your attention back onto the site.
One thing I've noticed about Meta, when I don't visit for a while, I seem to get a security-oriented password-reset email that would require me to visit the site to resolve.
#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-11-20 06:37 PM | Reply
As someone peripherally familiar with these lawsuits, the biggest problems the plaintiffs are facing is a lack of peer reviewed research into the psychological and medical scientific causes and effects of sites such as Meta, Google, Youtube, Facebook, TikTok, etc. But that will change soon. There is now a 'market' for that type of research among plaintiffs groups.
#3 | Posted by moder8 at 2023-11-21 01:28 PM | Reply
My wife and I vacation where there is no cell or internet. It is amazing how nice it is to be without it for 4 or 5 days. But I will admit the minute we get service we jump on our devises.
#4 | Posted by fishpaw at 2023-11-21 02:06 PM | Reply
... harmful by design ...
False.
There's nothing harmful about social media.
Not anymore than the radio, television or video games.
You know how many studies were published about children spending 8-12 hours a day in front of the television? Ample.
The difference being, when you left your house you couldn't take your television with you.
Personal responsibility is too much for some people.
So they seek to punish everyone for their lack of willpower.
You want to quit social media? Delete your apps and do what's necessary to break your addiction.
#5 | Posted by ClownShack at 2023-11-21 02:17 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
Social Media Addiction
Social media addiction is a behavioral addiction that is defined by being overly concerned about social media, driven by an uncontrollable urge to log on to or use social media, and devoting so much time and effort to social media that it impairs other important life areas.
www.addictioncenter.com
#6 | Posted by ClownShack at 2023-11-21 02:22 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
One thing I've noticed about Meta, when I don't visit for a while, I seem to get a security-oriented password-reset email that would require me to visit the site to resolve. #2 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER
That's in your user setting.
I haven't used Facebook since 2020, still have an active account, have never received a single email from it.
(Very rarely, less than a handful of times per year, I'll look up someone's name on Facebook to see if I know them.)
#7 | Posted by ClownShack at 2023-11-21 02:27 PM | Reply
This is like suing alcohol manufacturers because your son is an alcoholic.
I don't see how it passes.
#8 | Posted by ClownShack at 2023-11-21 02:28 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
@#7 ... That's in your user setting. ...
I see nothing in user settings that instructs Facebook to annoy me if I don't visit for a week.
#9 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-11-21 02:41 PM | Reply
You can't find the "don't annoy me" option?
They get more clever with where they hide it.
It's been a while since I last checked.
But there are options somewhere to disable Facebook from sending you any emails or notifications.
#10 | Posted by ClownShack at 2023-11-21 02:55 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
It'd be more like suing alcohol companies for marketing alcohol to minors and chemically tailoring their product to keep minors abusing it.
Doesn't sound so crazy now, does it?
#11 | Posted by JOE at 2023-11-21 02:55 PM | Reply
I would ask where the parents are and why they allow their kids to drink alcohol.
#12 | Posted by ClownShack at 2023-11-21 02:58 PM | Reply
@#10 ... But there are options somewhere to disable Facebook from sending you any emails or notifications. ...
Oh, I saw those options, and I have turned off all those notifications.
But I have not seen one about disabling this "security" notification.
#13 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-11-21 03:00 PM | Reply
Weird.
Perhaps you're the subject of unwanted attention and the platform is attempting to safeguard your account.
#14 | Posted by ClownShack at 2023-11-21 03:42 PM | Reply
@#14 ... Weird. ...
Yes, it is.
Even more weird, the emails always arrive in even numbers, e.g., 2 or 4 or 6 at a time, never 1 or 3 or 5.
I don't spend a lot of time on FB, maybe 5 or 10 minutes every three or four days. But if I stay away for a week or so, I start getting the password reset emails.
#15 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-11-21 04:14 PM | Reply
It has to be due to your settings.
I don't receive such notifications.
Ever.
#16 | Posted by ClownShack at 2023-11-21 04:20 PM | Reply
Harmful by design
assault internets with 30gig magazines should be outlawed
#17 | Posted by humanimal at 2023-11-21 04:20 PM | Reply
"I start getting the password reset emails."
In 15yrs I have never gotten anything of the sort.
Use has been heavy to sporadic.
#18 | Posted by Angrydad at 2023-11-21 04:34 PM | Reply
You sound like a Republican. If a company created a damaging product like alcohol, marketed it to minors, and scientifically altered the product to be more addictive to minors, they would rightfully be liable for some of the impact regardless of how stupid you think the parents are.
#19 | Posted by JOE at 2023-11-21 04:36 PM | Reply
I managed to get booted off FB for kicking one puppy too many well over a year ago. At first, I really missed keeping up with old college pals and the few acquaintances of mine still with us--not to mention the tempting allure of flaming mouth-breathing Trumpers for sport proved a hard habit to break. The image that demonstrated just how insidious social media has become is a snappie taken in Venice of a gondola full of young tourists, each one with their faces buried in their cellphones, completely oblivious to the centuries of history surrounding them. Come to think of it, it's been so long since I've checked my email, I've quite forgotten my Gmail password. I find I truthfully don't miss any of it.
#20 | Posted by dutch46 at 2023-11-21 04:37 PM | Reply
Posted by ClownShack
Posted by JOE
You both have points.
I'm not quite ready to equate print/video with mind altering drugs, though.
#21 | Posted by Angrydad at 2023-11-21 04:58 PM | Reply
I should become addicted to crack, then sue all large cities, Mexico, China, movie studios...
#22 | Posted by e1g1 at 2023-11-21 06:31 PM | Reply
If a company created a damaging product ... marketed it to minors, and ... altered the product to be more addictive to minors, they would rightfully be liable for some of the impact #19 | POSTED BY JOE
People get paid to market products to an audience. They make commercials and advertisements. If they're too successful at their jobs, they get bonuses and raises. Should there be penalties?
Manufacturing companies like General Mills adds unhealthy amounts of sugar to their breakfast cereals and specifically target kids. Could be blamed for childhood obesity and possibly diabetes. Are they libel for any impact?
Television has changed how society works. People stay in more sitting in front of them all day long. It's spreading propaganda for sources like Fox News. Are they libel?
#23 | Posted by ClownShack at 2023-11-21 06:56 PM | Reply
Clownshack.
FYI - The word is spelled "liable".
#24 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-11-21 07:03 PM | Reply
Anyone who hasn't watched "The Social Dilemma" should.
www.google.com
#25 | Posted by Miranda7 at 2023-11-21 08:26 PM | Reply
I didn't equate them. The principles at work in either scenario are the same, just to a different degree.
Are you even talking about the hypothetical anymore? Because there actually are laws about how you market products and who you can market them to, so your position on this sounds bizarrely libertarian, which suggests to me that you have some personal stake in this that is clouding your judgment.
Could be blamed for childhood obesity and possibly diabetes. Are they libel for any impact?
If they made their cereals intentionally addictive to children for the purpose of keeping kids eating their products, yeah i could see the theory behind someone in a normal country objecting to that. But the US isnt a normal country and you're proving that here.
#26 | Posted by JOE at 2023-11-21 09:59 PM | Reply
Gambling has been known to create addicts since at least the 1940's.
There's no substance involved other than what the brain produces.
#27 | Posted by Tor at 2023-11-21 10:07 PM | Reply
I had no idea what I wrote was so ground shaking.
#28 | Posted by Tor at 2023-11-22 01:21 PM | Reply
Post a commentComments are closed for this entry.Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2023 World Readable
Comments are closed for this entry.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2023 World Readable