Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, December 02, 2023

Donald Trump has shared a post on his Truth Social website, calling for Capitol Police officers who "beat the hell out of innocent J6 [January 6] protesters" to face criminal charges.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

That's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see how it plays out.

#1 | Posted by ABH at 2023-12-01 02:26 PM | Reply

The party of law and order, ladies and gentlemen.

#2 | Posted by qcp at 2023-12-01 02:31 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Backin the Blue, there, eh Chitler?

There is no bottom for this yagoff.

#3 | Posted by Wardog at 2023-12-01 02:37 PM | Reply

Where's JeffJ to say how much he hates Trump but he supports this...

#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2023-12-01 02:51 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 2

I watched the video. The guy they were beating kept pushing forward. That's on him, not the police.

Police interaction is a series of escalations. This guy was pushing forward. I'd be willing to be that if we had video leading up to where this was clipped it would show the police initially holding the line with this guy. Then shoving the guy back and THEN escalating to what we see in the video clip.

#5 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-01 02:59 PM | Reply

I'd pay $20 to see the police beat the ---- out of Fat Donnie Loser.

#6 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2023-12-01 10:47 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

What the f*** are you f****** f*** wtf?

The cops could see they were badly outnumbered there wasn't a chance in hell they were going to try to provoke a situation by attacking anyone. Their behavior on January 6th was entirely defensive.

#7 | Posted by Tor at 2023-12-01 10:50 PM | Reply

@#7 ... The cops could see they were badly outnumbered there wasn't a chance in hell they were going to try to provoke a situation by attacking anyone. Their behavior on January 6th was entirely defensive. ...

Exactly.

Once the bicycle rack lines were breached by the insurrectionists, theyinsurrectionists were in the Capitol.

The Capital Police then had to alter tactics.

Those altered tactics are shown in the videos being released of late.

#8 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-12-01 11:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

@#8

I gotta stop multi-tasking here... :)

theyinsurrectionists

- should be -

the insurrectionists

(sometimes, computers demand more attention than children. But that's a whole different topic...)


#9 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-12-01 11:03 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"The guy they were beating kept pushing forward. That's on him, not the police."

Not according to Trumpy. Who could apparently be our President and Commander in Chief ... again.

#10 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-12-02 01:52 PM | Reply

Trump wasn't even there. He's just sending a message of support to his flock ~ at least the ones who are not already in jail for attacking the Capitol Police and are also squealing on Trump like little piglets for a lighter sentence.

The message is not for them. Trump doesn't like people who get caught. Remember?

#11 | Posted by Twinpac at 2023-12-02 02:11 PM | Reply

I wonder how those police departments who supported The criminal insurrectionist in 2016 and 2020 feel about their candidate advocating the incarceration of police who were doing their duty. How many cops will support this criminal in 2024, against their self interest and at the risk of sending their comrades in blue to jail? Asking for a friend who is a police officer ...

#12 | Posted by catdog at 2023-12-02 02:14 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Trumpy is just upset because those cops are suing him and he lost his bid to be immune from being held accountable for his actions and the damages he did to them.

#13 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-12-02 02:31 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

"I wonder how those police departments who supported The criminal insurrectionist in 2016 and 2020 feel"

They just ignore it.

Police from all over the nation were part of that mob.

#14 | Posted by snoofy at 2023-12-02 03:00 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

The party of law and order, ladies and gentlemen

And yet, those deplorables will still vote for that twice impeached, 4 times indicted, lying POS.

#15 | Posted by FedUpWithPols at 2023-12-03 07:49 AM | Reply

The Left looooves when Cops are charged with police brutality, everyone on this site should be cheering.

#16 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2023-12-03 03:13 PM | Reply

---------- loved it when the filth-smearing MAGAts left a trail of dead cops on January 6.

#17 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2023-12-03 03:17 PM | Reply

18 would have been there to rough up some cops and help push the Fake Electors scheme, but had already scheduled his masculinizing surgery.

Think he said it was breast tissue removal this time.

#19 | Posted by Corky at 2023-12-03 03:36 PM | Reply

#18 | POSTED BY HUMANIMAL

#21 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2023-12-03 03:41 PM | Reply

20: The sheer number of lies in this post are astonishing:

1) she was REPEATEDLY warned to stop.

2) she waS NOT unarmed. She was carrying a broken chair leg she had taken from a chair she had broken elsewhere in the capital. It's what she used to smash out a window so she could continue advancing on speaker pelosi and others.

3) she was at the head of an angry mob, outnumbering the police there 100:1. Clearly meeting the definition of the officer fearing for his life and those under his charge. So it was certainly NOT murder, but a as justifiable shooting by an officer carrying out his duty.

You are indescribably stupid.

#23 | Posted by ABH at 2023-12-03 04:27 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"You are indescribably stupid."

You're only encouraging him.

#24 | Posted by snoofy at 2023-12-03 04:28 PM | Reply

He probably will but that as an invitation to try and outdo his own stupidity bar.

#25 | Posted by ABH at 2023-12-03 04:35 PM | Reply

I wonder if humanidiot would feel the same if he was guarding a door with his kids behind him and 100 people were smashing the window and trying to claw through to get at them.

#26 | Posted by ABH at 2023-12-03 04:55 PM | Reply

Trump wants, Trump wants...

Who the hell cares what that crazy @$$ed narsisitic
Chump wants?

Only morons, political sycophants, and cultist followers still do...

#27 | Posted by earthmuse at 2023-12-03 07:54 PM | Reply

@#27 ... Who the hell cares what that crazy @$$ed narsisitic
Chump wants?

Only morons, political sycophants, and cultist followers still do... ...

Sadly, while your comment may have some truth to it, it does not change the question asked, i.e., who cares....

imo, Trump supporters feel targeted by those enemy (and, yes, they seem to think that their fellow Americans are their enemy while hugging Pres Putin) Democrats because, well, why? No specific reasons are given, aside from Democrats opposing fmr Pres Trump. Just that fellow Americans who are Democrats are enemies of the Country because they oppose fmr Pres Trump.

And fmr Pres Trump is standing up against those enemy Democrats. And you have to support fmr Pres Trump because, if he fails in fighting those enemy Democrats, they will come after you next.


#28 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-12-03 08:17 PM | Reply

@#29 ... Just not buying any of it. ...

Why?

#30 | Posted by LampLighter at 2023-12-03 09:14 PM | Reply

so he was forced to shoot her directly in the head

Hit her in the shoulder, actually. Put and end to that little tourist event with one shot.

#31 | Posted by REDIAL at 2023-12-03 09:17 PM | Reply

Just translate the word "Trump" to the words "Putin's tool" and pretty much everything Trump does and says these days makes sense. He cares about the destruction of our democracy much as Putin accomplished in Russia.

#32 | Posted by Hughmass at 2023-12-04 06:27 AM | Reply

but now the same people like you say "there weren't enough cops" (whose fault is that?!) so he was forced to shoot her directly in the head without saying anything and without attempting a less-lethal alternative"

Is this a talking point or are you just incapable of understanding the difference between situations like cops killing unarmed civilians for minor infractions and then lying about it and a cop shooting an insurrectionist leading a violent mob trying to break into the capital?

People on the right don't really understand the sentiments of those on the left. Lefties are against oppression and support the premise of law and order. It is only when those charged with enforcement of law and order abuse that authority is when lefties take issue with enforcers. To characterize it any differently is just a transparent, cynical attempt to hide someone's contempt for the oppressed.

For many (most?) "Defund the Police" is/was a slogan to indicate that police departments should be de-militarized; that funds supporting militarization should be redirected to crime prevention.

#33 | Posted by FedUpWithPols at 2023-12-04 06:28 AM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

#29 people like me? You mean a retired cop that knows infinitely more than you about law enforcement?

#34 | Posted by ABH at 2023-12-04 06:54 AM | Reply

Which Parts aren't you buying?

The part where she was carrying a chair leg that she used to smash the window? It's on tape. It's in the reports. It's part of the eye witness testimony.

The part where he said "stop! Police!" Over a dozen times? Again, on tape, in the report, and post of the eye witness testimony.

The part where deadly force is situation dependent, and the courts in multiple cases have affirmed that overwhelming numbers are a determining factor that police can use to justify their fear for "life or great bodily injury" to themselves or others?

I mean, facts really are inconvenient at times, I get it.

#35 | Posted by ABH at 2023-12-04 07:03 AM | Reply

#33 This is why I gave your post a funny flag:

" Lefties are against oppression and support the premise of law and order."

#36 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-04 11:22 AM | Reply

#36
Like I said, people on the right don't understand the sentiments of those on the left.

#37 | Posted by FedUpWithPols at 2023-12-04 11:44 AM | Reply

I understand them perfectly well because I see what is not only advocated, but what ACTIONS are taken by leftists when they are in power.

It's authoritarianism bordering on totalitarianism.

#38 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-04 12:03 PM | Reply

It's authoritarianism bordering on totalitarianism.

#38 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Needless to say what an idiot you are.

The only question is whether the idiocy is genuine or performative.

#39 | Posted by Zed at 2023-12-04 12:07 PM | Reply

I understand them perfectly well because I see what is not only advocated, but what ACTIONS are taken by leftists when they are in power.
It's authoritarianism bordering on totalitarianism.

#38 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Aren't you the same idiot claiming Trump shouldn't be charged because he was president?

Yeah...shut up.

#40 | Posted by Sycophant at 2023-12-04 12:24 PM | Reply

#40

No. I said if a former president, particularly one who is running for re-election is going to be charged then the case needs to be iron-clad.

You are such an ankle biter. It's ridiculous.

#41 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-04 12:31 PM | Reply

" It's authoritarianism bordering on totalitarianism.

#38 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Needless to say what an idiot you are.

The only question is whether the idiocy is genuine or performative.

#39 | POSTED BY ZED AT 2023-12-04 12:07 PM | FLAG: "

On more than one occasion I witnessed you state that the J6 protesters and rioters should have been mowed down with fully automatic weapons. No crowd control measures like tear gas and rubber bullets. Just massacred.

#42 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-04 12:33 PM | Reply

On more than one occasion I witnessed you state that the J6 protesters and rioters should have been mowed down with fully automatic weapons. No crowd control measures like tear gas and rubber bullets. Just massacred.

#42 | Posted by BellRinger

And if the terrorists were muslim instead of christo fascists your party would say the same thing.

#43 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2023-12-04 12:41 PM | Reply

Non-lethals should always be the first choice in a riot situation. Shooting people is the last resort.

#44 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-04 12:46 PM | Reply

The Left looooves when Cops are charged with police brutality, everyone on this site should be cheering.

#16 | Posted by Bluewaffles

It's not policy brutality to for cops to beat up violent terrorists who are attempting to overthrow democracy.

#45 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2023-12-04 12:53 PM | Reply

Non-lethals should always be the first choice in a riot situation. Shooting people is the last resort.

#44 | Posted by BellRinger

This wasn't a random riot outside soccer championship it was an organized terrorist attack with the goal of toppling american democracy.

#46 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2023-12-04 12:54 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

On more than one occasion I witnessed you state that the J6 protesters and rioters should have been mowed down with fully automatic weapons.

#42 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

The police officers at the Capitol were wiser and more disciplined people than I, and I have no quarrel with them making the decision not to escalate an already violent situation by a general use of firearms. A-15's were available to the traitors that day.

Myself, personally----If I'm out-numbered ten to one by a howling, armed, blood-thirsty mob----Some of them are going to die so I and people I care about don't have to.

#47 | Posted by Zed at 2023-12-04 12:56 PM | Reply

#42 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Your political beliefs make you a poor morality standard-bearer.

Just saying.

#48 | Posted by Zed at 2023-12-04 12:57 PM | Reply

Non-lethals should always be the first choice in a riot situation.

#44 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

January 6th was too organized to qualify as a riot.

Too pre-planned.

The people executing it were, and are, traitors.

Yes, they deserved to be shot that day.

And one of them was, a woman who was among the most deserving.

#49 | Posted by Zed at 2023-12-04 01:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#49 Thank you for proving my point.

#50 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-04 01:08 PM | Reply

Uh: non lethal was the first and only choice for the insurrection.

The lone exception to that is the case of an officer assigned the Capitol Police executive protection unit who was guarding Nancy Pelosi. She was 10 meters behind him in the hallway, when 100 insurrectionist saw her and tried to open the locked door to get down the hallway and commit possible accrues of violence against her.

Despite repeated warnings to not breach the door by the protection officer, one of the insurrectionists, smashed out the window of the door with a club she was carrying and tried to lead the mob through.

She received a lethal, and perfectly legal, dose of lead poisoning for her efforts.

That she was the only one killed is an absolute miracle given the level of violence the police were facing.

#51 | Posted by ABH at 2023-12-04 01:08 PM | Reply

I understand them perfectly well because I see what is not only advocated, but what ACTIONS are taken by leftists when they are in power.
It's authoritarianism bordering on totalitarianism.

#38 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

You are insane. Democrats are nothing like Republicans. Not even close anymore. Biden is nothing like Trumpy and his fondness and desire to be like Pooty Pants, Viktor Orbn, Kim Jong Un or orher authoritarian dictators. Trumpy loves him some strong men dictators and would love to be part of that group.

The Republican Party is now the Trumpy Revenge and Retribution Party.

You have fun with that you hear? But don't expect it to end well.

#52 | Posted by donnerboy at 2023-12-04 01:12 PM | Reply

#51 ABH, in that particular instance I don't fault the officer for using lethal force. What I am talking about is what Zed has been advocating - that Capitol police should have waltzed in with Gatling guns and just mowed them all down without first using non-lethals to try and disperse the crowd.

#53 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-04 01:15 PM | Reply

" Democrats are nothing like Republicans."

Agreed. Democrats are far more authoritarian and fascist. They promoted a leader (Obama) who openly despises the country he was elected to lead and he governed accordingly - with malice intent. Biden is a decomposing leader who is being puppeteered into the same thing.

#54 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-04 01:17 PM | Reply

------------- killed his old man with horse paste.

#55 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2023-12-04 01:21 PM | Reply

You are such a repetitive drone. Get some new material.

#56 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-04 01:22 PM | Reply

What kind of monster would treat long covid with sheep drench?

#57 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2023-12-04 01:24 PM | Reply

#49 Thank you for proving my point.

#50 | Posted by BellRinger

Your "point" was that terrorists during a terror attack should be treated no differently that soccer fans after a championship.

#58 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2023-12-04 01:29 PM | Reply

They promoted a leader (Obama) who openly despises the country he was elected to lead and he governed accordingly - with malice intent.

The fact that you can say this with a straight face after the past 6 years is ludicrous. You have jumped the shark. Seek mental help.

#59 | Posted by JOE at 2023-12-04 01:33 PM | Reply

Trump being a POS doesn't change the fact that Obama absolutely despises this country and governed accordingly.

#60 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-04 01:38 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"Your "point" was that terrorists during a terror attack should be treated no differently that soccer fans after a championship.

#58 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY"

Crowd control is still crowd control. Should the national guard drop Napalm on the annual March for Life because they are protesting abortion?

#61 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-04 01:40 PM | Reply

#57 I give you credit for changing up the verbiage.

#62 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-04 01:41 PM | Reply

America hater ------------- cheered as his fellow MAGAts smeared ---- all over the Capitol while leaving a trail of dead cops in their wake.

#63 | Posted by Reinheitsgebot at 2023-12-04 01:48 PM | Reply

Am beginning to think Bellcow isn't JeffyJ.

Can't see a nice Polish boy becoming SO deluded.

#64 | Posted by Corky at 2023-12-04 01:52 PM | Reply

Obama absolutely despises this country and governed accordingly.

#60 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Needless to say what an idiot you are.

The only question is whether the idiocy is genuine or performative.

#65 | Posted by Zed at 2023-12-04 01:54 PM | Reply

Obama absolutely despises this country and governed accordingly.
#60 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Ten minutes to Wapner.

#66 | Posted by snoofy at 2023-12-04 01:56 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

#40
No. I said if a former president, particularly one who is running for re-election is going to be charged then the case needs to be iron-clad.
You are such an ankle biter. It's ridiculous.

#41 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Thankfully it is ironclad.

But no, you said they were politically motivated cases that shouldn't be brought.

You are such a lie. It's ridiculous.

#67 | Posted by Sycophant at 2023-12-04 02:00 PM | Reply

#56 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Physician, heal thyself.

#68 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2023-12-04 02:00 PM | Reply

Trump being a POS doesn't change the fact that Obama absolutely despises this country and governed accordingly.

#60 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

You have to be a certain level of stupid to reach this type of belief.

Thankfully Jeff is well beyond that level of stupid.

#69 | Posted by Sycophant at 2023-12-04 02:02 PM | Reply

"Thank--lly it is ironclad."

The classified docs case seems so.

The Alvin Bragg case is a joke.

But the point of that one is to be so ridiculous that it makes Trump look like a martyr so Republican voters support him as a -- to obvious lawfare as Trump has the narrowest path to victory among GOP hope--ls.

It's a brilliant short-term political strategy but I fear the longer-term repurcussions of said strategy.

#70 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-04 02:09 PM | Reply

Barack Obama's teen and early adult years were steeped in hatred of America. He bought into all of it and when he was elected he governed just as we'd expect from someone who inherently despises the country he was elected to lead.

#71 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-04 02:12 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"Barack Obama's teen and early adult years were steeped in hatred of America."

Five Minutes To Wapner!

#72 | Posted by snoofy at 2023-12-04 02:17 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Here are the results of a sweeping survey of historians, political scientists and presidential scholars maintained by Siena College Research Institute.

Since 1982, SCRI has ranked presidents across 20 categories, ranging from integrity to executive ability.

www.cbsnews.com

#73 | Posted by Corky at 2023-12-04 02:18 PM | Reply

Barack Obama's teen and early adult years were steeped in hatred of America. He bought into all of it and when he was elected he governed just as we'd expect from someone who inherently despises the country he was elected to lead.

#71 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER AT 2023-12-04 02:12 PM | REPLY

You're such a liar. But that's nothing new coming from You now is it??

#74 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2023-12-04 02:22 PM | Reply

Barack Obama's teen and early adult years were steeped in hatred of America. He bought into all of it and when he was elected he governed just as we'd expect from someone who inherently despises the country he was elected to lead.
#71 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

A whole bunch of rhetoric without any substance or specifics. Wonder why that is.

#75 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2023-12-04 04:45 PM | Reply

I can give all sorts of specifics - just don't want to relive what it was like having a POTUS who despises the country he was elected to lead.

#76 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-04 04:52 PM | Reply

#76 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Woman Yelling at Cat Meme - POTUS discussion

#77 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2023-12-04 04:58 PM | Reply

I can give all sorts of specifics - just don't want to relive what it was like having a POTUS who despises the country he was elected to lead.

POSTED BY BELLRINGER AT 2023-12-04 04:52 PM | REPLY

You're such a phony balony it's not even funny. Typical Jeff though.

#78 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2023-12-04 05:01 PM | Reply

Ballsucker is doing a piss poor job at trolling today. Nothing subtle whatsoever. What a pathetic waste of hydrogen that bag of orangutang piss is.

#79 | Posted by truthhurts at 2023-12-04 05:26 PM | Reply

Trump's followers are the kinds of people who respond to assign telling people offense is electrified and not to touch it by peeing on said fence and then suing the fence's owners.

#80 | Posted by Tor at 2023-12-04 05:36 PM | Reply

Crowd control is still crowd control. Should the national guard drop Napalm on the annual March for Life because they are protesting abortion?

#61 | Posted by BellRinger

Wrong. A celebratory riot and a terrorist attack on democracy are not the same and should not be treated the same.

You're going to be tying yourself into these pretzels for the rest of your life until you finally admit your party attempted a coup and you no longer support them because of it.

#81 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2023-12-04 05:48 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Barack Obama's teen and early adult years were steeped in hatred of America. He bought into all of it and when he was elected he governed just as we'd expect from someone who inherently despises the country he was elected to lead.

#71 | Posted by BellRinger

Wow all that hatred of america and obama never called the white house a dump, never called air force 1 a peice of crap, never said he trusted putin over the us military, and never attempted a coup to end democracy.

Guess who did? YOur party's cult leader. So if hatred of america is bad, why do you support the party that is lead by an america-hater?

#82 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2023-12-04 05:50 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

If the police wanted to brutalize the insurrectionists they would have driven patrol cars into the armed mobs flanks.

#83 | Posted by Tor at 2023-12-04 07:02 PM | Reply

#81 Call it what you want. Doesn't change how crowd control is handled.

#84 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-04 08:52 PM | Reply

#81 Call it what you want. Doesn't change how crowd control is handled.

#84 | Posted by BellRinger

So all crowd control is the same in your world.

Crowd control at a high school pep rally is the same as crowd control at a terrorist attack.

That's your final answer?

#85 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2023-12-04 10:10 PM | Reply

#85. For the purpose of trying to quell a riot protocol remains the same regardless of what set off the crowd. That protocol is to use non-lethal means of dispersing rioters.

#86 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-05 11:16 AM | Reply

" protocol is to use non-lethal means of dispersing rioters."

Seems like the protocol was followed, except in the sole most egregious incident.

Pretty tame, all things considered.

#87 | Posted by Danforth at 2023-12-05 11:25 AM | Reply

#87. Honestly, I wish more had been done to disperse the rioters more quickly. But yes, capitol police didn't bust out machine guns and mow them down en masse as some on this site advocated.

#88 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-05 11:34 AM | Reply

That protocol is to use non-lethal means of dispersing rioters.

#86 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

What's the protocol in dispersing Brown Shirts?

1/06 was not a riot. It was a timed and in large part planed and disciplined attack with a definite objective.

#89 | Posted by Zed at 2023-12-05 11:38 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

But yes, capitol police didn't bust out machine guns and mow them down en masse as some on this site advocated.

#88 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Do you think that that would have made them any more of a martyr that the Right has done?

I am astonished that the police didn't kill more of the "rioters" that day. They were in immediate fear for their lives throughout. Usually the perps get killed in that circumstance.

#90 | Posted by Zed at 2023-12-05 11:41 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"But yes, capitol police didn't bust out machine guns and mow them down en masse as some on this site advocated."

Oh, ffs. We all know YOU would've advocated it had it been BLM.

Capitol Police were amazingly reserved on J6.

#91 | Posted by Danforth at 2023-12-05 11:41 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

am astonished that the police didn't kill more of the "rioters" that day. They were in immediate fear for their lives throughout. Usually the perps get killed in that circumstance.

#90 | POSTED BY ZED AT 2023-

Skin color dependent

#92 | Posted by truthhurts at 2023-12-05 11:43 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Trump could dispersed them with a tweet.

But that wasn't part of the Fake Electors Plan, shutting down the Capitol long enough to get Pence replaced by Grasseley was.

#93 | Posted by Corky at 2023-12-05 11:47 AM | Reply

" Oh, ffs. We all know YOU would've advocated it had it been BLM."

What is your deal today. When have I ever advocated mowing down rioters, BLM or otherwise, with fully automatic weapons?

#94 | Posted by BellRinger at 2023-12-05 11:49 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort