Sunday, April 05, 2026

Why Trump might regret his historic visit to SCOTUS

President Donald Trump bulldozed yet another longstanding norm of American government on Wednesday by becoming the first modern president to attend an oral argument of the Supreme Court. It's no real secret what this was about. Presidents have avoided attending oral arguments to negate even the appearance of trying to unduly influence a coequal branch of government.

Comments

More from the article ...

... But Trump is happy to browbeat whomever it takes to get what he wants. And he's reserved some of his most pointed recent criticisms for Supreme Court justices he appointed who have occasionally ruled against him.

So after spending two years floating breaking this norm -- and after suffering his biggest Supreme Court defeat in the chamber's February tariffs decision -- Trump finally did it.

But his decision to go was curious. And it's arguably even more so after the hearing.

Trump seemed to want to send a signal to judges, who have increasingly proven his biggest obstacles in his second term. The fact that he chose to attend even amid the war with Iran -- and hours ahead of a primetime address to the nation on the conflict -- would seem to reinforce that. It's not like he doesn't have other things to do.

But combined with a series of adverse recent court rulings, his presence at the Supreme Court risked reinforcing how little he can control the judicial branch.

The policy at issue on Wednesday was Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship. On the president's first day back in office last year, he sought to effectively overturn the more-than-century-old interpretation that the 14th Amendment grants citizenship to the children born to noncitizens on US soil.

The conventional wisdom has long been that this order stood little chance of surviving the courts -- it's been ruled against at every turn in the lower courts -- and Wednesday's hearing did little to disabuse anyone of that notion.

Solicitor General D. John Sauer faced a barrage of skeptical questions even from the court's conservative and Trump-appointed justices.

In perhaps the most difficult exchange for the administration, Chief Justice John Roberts pressed Sauer on its claims about so-called "birth tourism," or traveling to US soil to deliver a child so they can be a citizen. When Roberts noted that wasn't a problem when the 14th Amendment was ratified after the Civil War, Sauer responded that "we're in a new world now."

To which Roberts shot back: "Well, it's a new world. It's the same Constitution." ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-04-05 04:13 PM

Donald Trump thinks that he can bend events to the power of his nasty, glowering faces.

#2 | Posted by Zed at 2026-04-05 04:43 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Franklin Graham: 'Pope Leo is wrong; God justifies wars' (71 comments)

'Praise be to Allah' (38 comments)

Trump Wants $152 Million to Rebuild and Reopen Alcatraz (19 comments)

25th Amendment: Former Trump Attorney Calls Out Cabinet for Not Invoking (19 comments)

Trump Calls Vance the 'Fraud Czar' -- Targets Blue States (16 comments)

South Florida Gas Stations Are Reporting Shortages (15 comments)

Pentagon Hiding US Military Casualties in Middle East: Intercept (14 comments)

Trump Truth Store Temporarily Closes Due to Low Sales (13 comments)

Trump's 2027 Budget Cuts Non-Defense 10 percent, Boosts Military to $1.5T (13 comments)

AI Models Will Deceive You to Save Their Own Kind (11 comments)