The tenets of Conservatism are most closely aligned with the intent of the Constitution.

#4 | POSTED BY MAO_CONTENT

By golly that's neat. Wish there were some conservatives left in the GOP.

If the sanctions are causing the default,and Russia has the means and desire to pay, the sanctioning government's are responsible for the default.

#6 | POSTED BY EFFETEPOSER A

What genius.

I'm waiting for a Muslim coach to get down and kneel on his pray rug after a game. According to this ruling, he will be protected by the first amendment.

Of course he would. Why wouldn't he?

#77 | POSTED BY MAO_CONTENT

The 1st Amendment won't protect him from death threats in many areas of our mutual home state.

You KNOW that.

It is now more imperative than ever that Ukraine surrender.

The hypocrisy with you brain dead MAGA morons is amazing.

#1 | POSTED BY A_MONSON

It's merely life as they know it, and life the way they would like to make mandatory for everyone.

Snow, snow, snowflake.

At what point does his emotionality make him a ----?

I think the Right-wing position is that it was better you died.

There's a thing called contraception

#31 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

That very well not be with us much longer, legally.

You belong to a weird-ass political cult that feeds on spectacular ignorance, spite, misogyny, and hypocrisy.

But it makes you feel good, so there's that.

Getting pregnant, in most cases, is irresponsible behavior.

#31 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

And, each and every time you did have sex, you expected the girl or woman to take care of birth control.

Men always enjoy an option women don't have when there is an "irresponsible" or accidental pregnancy (you do know the concept of accidents?).

They can walk away. Many do. I'm sure you know men that have. Perhaps you've done.

Getting pregnant, in most cases, is irresponsible behavior.

#31 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

Having sex outside of marriage is irresponsible behavior.

I'm sure you never did that.

Individual gun ownership isn't mentioned in the Constitution, either.

In the fullness of time, some more majority of SC Justices will notice that.

#15 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

The Consitution doesn't talk about most things. I mean, how could it?

Let me repeat: It really doesn't say much about life and living at all.

Whereas the Law has an awful lot to say about precedent in the interpretation of the Constitution.

Fascist Republican judges lied about their commitment to legal precedent.

You are going to pay just like the rest of us.

Junior.

It never ceases to amaze me what humorless clowns these people are on serious matters.

Jesus never existed.

#10 | POSTED BY RJSQUIRREL

I disagree with this but understand that many people don't. That's fine with me.

JUDGE KEG is pushing his religion on Mr. Squirrel while at the same time pushing his version of religion on me.

There's no reason for it to happen, and no reason to put up with it.

BTW, what does the constitution say about abortion?

#8 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

What did those SC fascists say about legal precedent?

NO ONE told her that Republican nominees to the SC lie about ROE?

The Right will have to imprison women to keep them from abortions, as they already really want to do. They will also have to execute them for murder, as they have also said they want to do.

None of it will work. In fact, it is likely that none of this will even make a dent. Abortion is a procedure that precedes civilization and, like alcohol consumption, will not be suppressed.

COVID vaccines prevented fascists from killing an additional twenty million the first year.

Utah men aren't tasked with any ----- regulation whatsoever.

For all those women out there who need abortions, an Underground is forming. In fact, it's been in existence waiting for this day.

The fascist Right will have to track down miscarriages and outright abortions like the Nazis did the Jews. But there will still be abortions like there still are Jews and, having pushed this stuff entirely underground, they will never know if they have actually reduced the number of abortions or not.

Because they'd rather pay for an abortion than maternity leave.

#8 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS A

Maybe, but who cares?

As has been stated, subversion of this suppression of American rights will be creative, well-funded, and permanent. This is the least of it.

THen the voters will fix the issue

#111 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

You do realize that you people make it increasingly hard to vote, generally speaking?

And then there was that recent thing where you people attempting to disenfranchise eighty-million Americans during a coup attempt.

It's all a lot more complicated and frightening than you'd like to make it seem.

If you people would get out of the way, democracy might have a chance.

As it stands, you're not on the side of the voters or the democracy most of them would like to have.

All this ruling did is put this back in the state's hands where it belongs.

#109 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

Where laws that require a healthy woman die to give birth to an unviable ------ rape fetus will be on the books.

If you want to take credit for saving the unborn, take credit for the adults you kill along the way.

#98 | POSTED BY LEGALLYDORKY

Keep it your pants.