Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Recently Flagged Comments

Recently flagged comments from all news stories on this site. Users must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you want to retrieve a comment of yours that was recently deleted, visit your user page and click the Moderation link.

There is not 'right" temperature as it has been in flux since the atmosphere formed on the planet.
#11 | Posted by MSgt

You are SO INCREDIBLY ARROGANT AND STUPID that you don't even realize you're lying.

"Take a hundred modern humans, give them stone-age tools, and drop them into a random point in Earth's 4.6 billion-year history. The question is not when they would die, it is when they would thrive. The answer turns out to be surprisingly recent. For most of Earth's existence, the atmosphere was either too thin in oxygen, too rich in carbon dioxide, or too unstable to keep a community alive for more than a few weeks. The honest floor is roughly 298 million years ago. Anything earlier, and the air itself would kill them."
cosmosunveiled.com

"What is the earliest, geologically, that humans could have survived on Earth?
Fancy a trip to the Jurassic or Cambrian era? In order to survive the environments of the past people would need a number of things...

"If we used a time machine to travel back to a prehistoric period, the earliest we could survive would be the Cambrian (around 541 million years ago). Any earlier than that and there wouldn't have been enough oxygen in the air to breathe.

"At the beginning of the Cambrian, the air at sea level would have felt like base camp at Mount Everest, but the climate was milder and more uniform than today. A bigger problem would be finding something to eat because there were no land plants or animals. You'd need to find a way of catching trilobites and other strange-looking shellfish, without wood to make a spear or plant fibre to make a fishing net. And you'd have to eat them raw, unless you could find a way to extract oil from these animals, or burn dry seaweed."
www.sciencefocus.com

All excellent theories.

Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his secure federal cell at MCC on 10 Aug 2019 (during the first Trumpf junta).

Ghislaine Maxwell was sentenced on 28 June 2022 (during the Biden admininistration).

"Useless" Merrick Garland could have released those damnable files from 29 June 2022 to 5 Nov 2024.

Instead, Merrick "the Meek" kept those files from SC Jack Smith (who had no "need-to-know" as he was overseas at the ICC when these two cases broke), as well as the rest of the public (including NYS AG Letitia James and Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg).

SC Jack Smith would have had a field day exploring other avenues of approach to prosecute Dummkopf Trumpf, instead of the two narrow tracks given to him by USAG Garland (1) organizing the Jan 6 insurrection; (2) and hoarding classified materials.

And Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's many victims would have been paraded around, providing lurid testimony about POTUS candidate Doofus Trumpf (R) to Congress and in NYS or Florida courtrooms.

That would have made Trumpf's campaign from 29 June 2022 to 5 Nov 2024 to seize power a bit harder.

My theory is that the AIPAC-laden cabinet of Joe Biden wanted the Epstein files -- a veritable Pandora's Box -- unavailable for public scrutiny in order to shield Israel's powerful tentacles in America through their two sayanims: Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

For example, Israeli ex-PM Ehud Barak inadvertent, yet embarrassing, exposure in the Epstein files occurred circa February to May 2025 during Trumpf's second junta, not during Biden's administration.

"FUNNY 2"

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy