29

That's yet another reason why congress won't subject themselves to age limits....they'd royally screw up the seniority thing.

A factor most voters don't understand.

and if age mattered to voters? Then explain how members of the US House of Reps (who only serve 2 year terms) keep getting elected well into their 70s and 80s? Every 2 years a younger option could be available....and they can run on their youth and drive a wedge between the voters and the older opponent.

There is a reason why there are so many old members of the House........because voters, despite what they say, don't really care about age.

Old age is an advantage for members of congress......not the other way around.

We aren't going to set age caps.

Geez....would you all STFU?

None of you are serious.

If you were then this conversation wouldn't be exclusively about Mitch McConnell....but it is.

Here.....consider what you're suggesting with an age cap.......

Name them.

#51 | Posted by Alexandrite a

I wasn't serious. You were putting words in my mouth......so I thought it was fair to hit back.

was that unfair?

I can't hit back here.

I think you're realizing I can hit back. I've let dopes like you spew incoherent whining and bitching all the time here with zero consequences for accuracy or proper context.

So, when I think it's appropriate.....I'm going to put another perspective in play.

Which is what I did in 29

Again, from where do you get the ------- gall to tell me when and how much to get angry?

I'm supposed to get angry? That solves your problems how????

Is this what you tell people who get cancer? "Why aren't you angry??? If you're not angry, then you're just not paying attention!!!"

You realize how ------- stupid you look when you say stupid ---- like that?

What you're really doing is attaching some sort of made up intelligence to your inability to control your anger.

You've decided it's some symbol of your enlightenment.

Which is complete crap. It's nothing more than a symbol of your immaturity and ignorance. You know....the exact opposite of what you were hoping for.

-We're experiencing the worst presidency of our lifetimes

Until JD Vance steps in.

And you'll say exactly that ... ... ... again.

"My life is actually fine. I get free ---- all the time. I'm protected by a society that coddles me from cradle to the grave.

But the president is a corrupt ------- so nothing else matters"

-Alex

-This country was unmatched in the 1950s and 60s.

Yes it was.

Too bad for the blacks and women though.

Thank you though. I believe most here including you aren't monsters personally.

Things are hard.

But they're always hard, IMO.

Or drafted to Vietnam.

That would be so much better than now.

-Your kids are going to grow up in the --------- version of America.

No ----.

I wish I had raised them in the 30s.

Or maybe my son could have been shot in France by a Nazi

Good times!!!

It matters to me how my kids do.

None of them voted for Trump nor my wife and I. That's 4 votes against Trump.

In the meantime, I view the challenges created by Trump and any challenges not created by Trump the same.

Because they are.

Like the weather or traffic or disease or injury.

I deal with it.

"If you're not mad at Trump and his administration, you're either a ------- idiot or you're getting rich off the nonstop fraud and corruption."

Clearly, you're not comfortable with your own emotions

You're seeking validation for your rage

You're free to be angry about whatever you want

But the continued insistence that everyone join you in a----------- of anger is just a cry for validation.

I have so many things to worry about. My kids, my wife, job, etc ... ..I have a ------- on my plate. A ------- of exposure to what's going on.

Honestly I don't think it's possible for you or Alex or corky to possess even a fraction of appreciation of that nor the intelligence or maturity or humility to believe for a second I don't see what's going on. That I'm too blind to see it.

I need to be angry because you say so?

To tell you to ---- off just doesn't give it justice.

Instead, I'm going to rub your diapers in your faces each and every day I frequent this place.

I couldn't possibly be more arrogant and blind as any of you fools.

For fun, list them.

#22 | POSTED BY JPW AT 2026-09-17 07:34 PM | FLAG:

Are you sure?

You're getting outright cucked at the moment. I can't imagine you're interested in making it worse.

-Anyone who isn't angry isn't paying attention.

Who exactly owes you their anger?

Someone old enough to have experienced the Great Depression?

Someone who lived through WW2 or Vietnam?

Someone who experienced high inflation, high interest rates, high gas prices in the late 70s?

High unemployment?

Lost their home in 2008 and/or their retirement savings?

People who were directly impacted by 9-11?

I'll stop there but you get my point.

Where the ---- do you get the gall to insist everyone be so damn angry?

Are you that obliviously ignorant to not have any regard for people who have experienced some serious serious serious ----?

8

You're right.

Let me try again.

This is what Clownshack would say if McConnell were a Democrat.

"Real median household income increased 2.6%"

Does that account for inflation or not?

Voters decide how old.

This is what everyone here would be saying if McConnell were a Democrat.

-What was inflation in that same time frame?

Doesn't "real median ... ." Account for inflation?

I just quoted that from the article. That's not intended to argue against anyone's points.

"And you wonder why I doubt ... ."

The only thing I wonder about you is exactly why you're so unbelievably angry all the time.

I have a few options there, but you're not gonna like any of them ... ..

I obviously cheated you somewhere in your life, but I honestly don't remember how or when.

"Biggest inauguration crowd ever".

I don't think the census bureau reported that.

It's coming from the census bureau and they also disclosed their methodology.

It's in the article........

and this.....

"Real median household income increased 2.6% to $87,460 in 2025, the highest level in a Census series dating back to 1967."

I'm sure there is plenty of bad news......LOL

Paxton will argue the law didn't prevent providers from performing the abortion.

His evidence....the family is also suing the providers who didn't perform the abortion.