All excellent theories.
Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his secure federal cell at MCC on 10 Aug 2019 (during the first Trumpf junta).
Ghislaine Maxwell was sentenced on 28 June 2022 (during the Biden admininistration).
"Useless" Merrick Garland could have released those damnable files from 29 June 2022 to 5 Nov 2024.
Instead, Merrick "the Meek" kept those files from SC Jack Smith (who had no "need-to-know" as he was overseas at the ICC when these two cases broke), as well as the rest of the public (including NYS AG Letitia James and Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg).
SC Jack Smith would have had a field day exploring other avenues of approach to prosecute Dummkopf Trumpf, instead of the two narrow tracks given to him by USAG Garland (1) organizing the Jan 6 insurrection; (2) and hoarding classified materials.
And Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's many victims would have been paraded around, providing lurid testimony about POTUS candidate Doofus Trumpf (R) to Congress and in NYS or Florida courtrooms.
That would have made Trumpf's campaign from 29 June 2022 to 5 Nov 2024 to seize power a bit harder.
My theory is that the AIPAC-laden cabinet of Joe Biden wanted the Epstein files -- a veritable Pandora's Box -- unavailable for public scrutiny in order to shield Israel's powerful tentacles in America through their two sayanims: Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
For example, Israeli ex-PM Ehud Barak inadvertent, yet embarrassing, exposure in the Epstein files occurred circa February to May 2025 during Trumpf's second junta, not during Biden's administration.
"FUNNY 2"
"Republicans have been attacking public education for a terrible ROI"
Republicans are tearing down public education, but not providing anything to replace it.
This is how the anger I'm talking about is made manifest.
By destroying things.
"Republicans have supported school choice and even vouchers so parents have options as to where their children go to school."
School choice, as a practical matter, amounts robbing Peter to pay Paul. It's a zero sum game.
Vouchers, on the other hand, are a direct attack on public schools. I'll believe vouchers are a serious solution when Republicans pass a law saying every school must accept every voucher, just as every public school must accept every student. You know why Republicans won't require that.
Private schools that can and do discriminate who they accept. Public schools cannot do that. Vouchers is a policy designed to leave the "undesired" children behind, in schools with even less funding. It's an attack both on public schools, and on students that private schools choose to discriminate against. And you don't dare respond to any of this. Because you know I'm right.
I'll end with this: It comes as no surprise that you created this thread, ostensibly bemoaning the lack of civics education, so you could propagandize anti-democratic un-civic Vouchers.