#11 Coriolanus posits, "I would hate to think USAG Merrick Garland didn't release the Epstein files from 21 Jan 2021 to 19 Jan 2025...."
Of course, there was no call from Democrats for any such release.
The "Epstein Files" mania was a MAGA/QANON phenomenon.
Democrats in general, and the Biden administration, in particular, never once campaigned for/against the Epstein files.
Again, that was a MAGA/QANON phenomenon.
Care to list any sustained voices from the left/Democratic Party, calling for the release of the Epstein files from 21 Jan 2021 to 19 Jan 2025?
Why do you insist on playing Cassiodorus, proudly proclaiming that any Democratic Party loss as a clear repudiation of "AIPAC/AIPAC-Democratic official/Israel," while completely ignoring the multitude of inputs to the American political environment, any number of which would cause Democratic party victories and Republican Party losses.
Want to bolster your position? Present evidence that "AIPAC/AIPAC-Democratic official/Israel" was the absolute determining factor in Kamala Harris' loss. Or that it even contributed more than just some votes in some areas of Michigan.
But move the needle in every single swing state in the direction of Trump because of AIPAC/AIPAC-Democratic official/Israel? That's a unicorn.
As for me? I've posted, where the anti-Harris They/Them 2024 ads were clear cause to the defection of very specific voters in the seven (7) swing states,..
And that's what moved the needle in every single swing state in the direction of Trump in 2024.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that Eisenhower Republicans would take umbrage with Barney showering in the girls' locker room because Barney felt like a girl that day...
#79 | Posted by madbomber
Eisenhower Republicahs are educated enough to know that's not an accurate depiction of gender.
It's a shame you're not as educatef as an Eisenhower Republican. Instead you have a Trump Republican's understanding of gender, on par with a grade school child.