Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Recently Flagged Comments

Recently flagged comments from all news stories on this site. Users must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you want to retrieve a comment of yours that was recently deleted, visit your user page and click the Moderation link.

Americans Unable to Pay Car Loans Surpasses 2008 Levels

www.newsweek.com

The disgusting------------ is worse than dumya. How pathetic.

@#8 ... Trump still thinks his name has a high dollar value. ...

Like this?

Judge Sides With Residents Who Want Trump's Name Off Their NYC Building (2018)
www.npr.org

... A judge in New York has ruled that residents of Trump Place, a condominium building on Manhattan's West Side, have the right to remove President Trump's name from the building if enough of them approve of it.

The ruling by New York Supreme Court Judge Eileen Bransten marks a defeat for the Trump Organization, which had argued that removing the name would violate the building's licensing agreement.

The company has had to contend with a growing number of commercial and residential buildings, including several outside the country, that want to remove Trump's name.

In New York, several other apartment buildings along the Hudson River have taken the same step. The Trump Soho, a condo hotel opened with great fanfare a decade ago, has been rechristened the Dominick. ...


@#154

OK, grateful to my TiVo, on which I recorded the show, starting at 11:35PM on Feb 16 and 17. After I watched the shows, I deleted them, but TiVo keeps a ~trash can~ of all the shows I've recorded, watched and deleted going back over the past month or so ...

OK, I just "undeleted" the 2/16 and the 2/17 shows.

I offer the following unofficial transcript of what I hear in the Feb 16 show ...

... But we were told in no uncertain terms by our network's lawyers, who called us directly, that we could not have him on the broadcast. The, then I was told in some uncertain terms that not only could I have not him on, but I could not mention me not having him on. And, because, my network clearly does not want us to talk about this, let's talk about this ...

I offer the following unofficial transcript of what I hear in the Feb 17 show ...

... Carr issued a letter saying he was thinking of getting rid of that talk-show exception [from the equal-time rule]. He had not gotten rid of it yet.

But, CBS generously did it for him. And told me, unilaterally that I had to abide by the equal time rules.

Something that I have never been asked to do in the interviews for the 21 years of this job

Now, that decision, I want to be clear, is their right.

Just like I have to talk about their decision on air.

...

Anyway, I said my peace last night, I said my peace, I mmade some jokes, that's what they pay me for. I was ready to let the whole thing go.

Until a few hours ago, when my group chat blew up ...

Without ever talking to me, the corporation put out this press release [shown on the air]

Now, this is a surprisingly small piece of paper considering how many butts it is trying to cover ...


Bannon also talked to Epstein about taking down the Pope:

there's already a thread up about that:

drudge.com

SO but, wait... who WAS Epstein that he was powerful enough to talk to about taking down Presidents and Popes?

Trump's Russian Handler? Trump's Israeli Handler? Both?

Related ...

Americans believe Epstein files show the powerful get a pass, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
www.reuters.com

... Americans believe that wealthy and powerful people are rarely held accountable, a new Reuters/Ipsos poll found after the release of millions of records on the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's connections in elite U.S. business and political circles.

Some 69% of respondents in the four-day poll, which concluded on Monday, said their views were captured "very well" or "extremely well" by a statement that the Epstein files "show that powerful people in the U.S. are rarely held accountable for their actions."

Another 17% said the statement described their views "somewhat well," while 11% said it didn't reflect their thinking.

Among both Republicans and Democrats, more than 80% said the statement described their thinking at least somewhat well. ...


Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy