"You ask an irrelevant question, then complain about my posting relevant responses."

Aren't you the guy who asked for examples of voter suppression, and then ran away when multiple posters gave multiple examples?

" bankrupted her while she was in her prime."

Skipped the math and history classes?

Reagan changed the equation, and between then and ~2010, the SS system brought in more was they paid out. Going underwater with the equation was something we knew in 1986 would happen around 2010-2012, regardless who was President. It's also why the subject NEVER CAME UP during those years.

We've also seen the bubble of the baby boomers' retirement coming at us for a half-century, and we're currently in the 16th year of 19 years of that bubble. It will continue as the youngest age through retirement.

If anyone had a brain they would've used the surpluses from 2001 to shore up known coming shortfalls, as baby boomers were just about to start to retiring at that time.

Instead, Cheney and Dubya reset America's fiscal sights from Surplusville to Debtsylvania. THAT is the moment that'll be seen as "bankrupting" America.

That, and Trump spending like his hair is on fire.

"I've done so on countless occasions"

Well, I guess in a metaphorical way...zero is countess.

"Ever hear of Mark Houck?"

No.

"I've provided all sorts of links in the past "

None with proof. Your "Hunter Biden's Suppressed Laptop" theory can't pass the "How was Fox, Newsmax, the WSJ, and OANN in on the censorship?" hurdle.

Your "Twitter Files" turned out to be Editors doing Editor things.

The only government pushback (CENSORSHIP!!!) was reported by Zuckerberg, who couldn't be bothered to say ABOUT WHAT, meaning it had to be embarrassing to Zuckerberg...like the Tide Pod Challenge. IOW, MAL-information. Meanwhile, you won't even condemn malinformation.

You SCREECHED about Hunter using the Biden name for personal gain, and Gomer Comer couldn't prove a single untoward act; the two most important witnesses Comer brought both testified IN FAVOR of Hunter. Now, of course, you're dead silent while ALL the Trumps grift, out in the open.

And for all your "Lawfare" claims, you've never shown a single example where Trump's behavior could've been done by the average Joe. And now, you've consistently looked the other way as Trump has turned the DOJ into his own personal vendetta machine.

And now you're claiming your proved it ALL? Nonsense. Are you lying, again? Or will you be using the "hyperbole" excuse" again?.

"You love and adore fascism when Democrats are in power."

Hyperbole, or lie? You Make The Call!

"Clear examples of all of those things."

What? You FINALLY have Lawfare? Link away.

You FINALLY found the Biden administration Censoring? Link away.

You FINALLY found Biden grifting??? Link away, by all means!!!

Frankly, you're lying, lying, and lying...in that order. But go ahead: show us where Trump was prosecuted for what you or I could do (Lawfare)... Show us where editors were forced to go AGAINST their Board's choice by the government (Censorship)...And show us where you think Biden was grifting.

Or run away, which is what you usually do at this point...
.

"claims things he didn't hear don't exist."

Which are those, specifically?

And why did you run from the recent thread where you asked for examples of voter suppression, then ran away when several posters offered multiple examples?

" I observe their policies when they are in power."

Then you lie about them.

Remember when you claimed censorship under Biden, or grift, or weaponization, and couldn't find any?

Now they're staring you in the face, and your reaction is "look at what someone ELSE did!"

Thanks for proving, once again, whenever The Party of Responsibility mentions responsibility, they're ALWAYS talking about SOMEONE ELSE's responsibility, and never their own.

"Wanna know why I don't vote Democrat? This is what they want for the US."

IOW, you can't deal with what the Republicans have actually become, so you have to make up a fake version of Democrats to hate.