"I've been following this virologist's -------- from when Steve Bannon found her and interviewed her months ago."

The article is not about Bannon's or Yan's claims or personal views. Those are just mentioned in passing as a pretext for a broader attack against any consideration of the proposition that it "originated" in a lab (i.e. could have been experimented on in a lab and made more deadly or infectious before it was transmitted (accidentally or otherwise) to humans outside the lab).

"The comment section was filled with cries of "kill me I'm just too stupid to live.""

Kind of like your user page?

I didn't read all the comments, but there are many valid points including that this went beyond skepticism or scientific refutation and crossed the line into being a hit piece.

"Who did that?"

The article posted is pure political propaganda intended to paint such a picture about this topic. Even several of the comments on Newsweek's site skewer it for its unscientific hypocrisy.

"Any year in which words have defined meanings."

*whoosh*

'There's no such thing as a "voter who stayed home."'

What year are you posting from?

'he will say that "It's different."'

He's already saying that. The argument now is that it's because opposing parties controlled the Senate and Presidency last time. Oh, and some other nonsense about how the court needs to be at full capacity this time in case it needs to decide an election issue... as if that wouldn't have been a valid consideration last time.

"Hope those moderates and progressives aren't so foolish as to be dissuaded by more Russian/GOP psyops in the next 50 years."

Who needs Russian/GOP psyops when they've got useless idiots like you pushing away self-proclaimed moderates and progressives? One of the lessons you should have learned from 2016 is that trying to shame voters who stayed home, voted third party, etc. backfired. Certainly those of you who engage(d) in that need to own some responsibility for the consequences of Trump getting into office.

Keep suckin' that straw man. It's funny how idiots politicize this, both by linking anyone who disagrees with their view with alleged support for Trump, and also by shamelessly putting forth a view that's analogous to claiming man-made climate change does not exist.

"How do you rate Trump's performance"

Very poor.

"Define "modified"."

Why are you acting like Snoofy here? You already know there are types of modifications done in labs which are basically controlled and "sped up" versions of evolution that occur in nature.

It was pointed out numerous times that this is a straw man.

No scientist has been able to rule out that the virus was collected in nature and then modified in a lab.

*losses. >:-)

So sorry for your loss.

I didn't post the video, but I will cop to hiring your mom off a street corner to give that seminar.

#35

You are demonstrating exactly who you are with that statement.

Just to be clear, this is the type of thing we're talking about:

^ CRT juice is one hell of a drug.

Thanks for admitting the content in CRT training is dopey, and demonstrating how attempts to justify it are irrational.

"the truth about incarceration rates."

Explain how that has anything to do with the circumstances surrounding the George Floyd or Jacob Blake incidents.

Then explain how that justifies the dopey content found in CRT training.

Because once you're a Belieber...(spreads arms) *every* thing is about race. The non-believers are ------- infidels for not believing every interaction between police (no matter their color) and a colored person of color is about race.

According to you guys, even questioning whether a specific incident was related to or caused by systemic racism implies one is not a Belieber.

Precious... bodily... fluids.

How many copies of White Fragility do you have on your bookshelf, Danforth? Have you flagellated yourself today for you sins?

Anybody who can't distinguish between "the legal system" and specific, quantifiable examples within the legal system is a moron until they graduate from the sophomore level.

To this date, no one has been able explain how what happened to George Floyd (which was terrible) had anything to do with systemic racism...

...much less how it justifies a government web site like the Smithsonian putting up that racist infographic (now taken down) or promoting Robin DiAngelo's racist work (which is probably still up) and other CRT crap being pushed under Orwellian labels like 'anti-racism'.

From the follow up reply from the same author of the embedded tweet:

...the burden of proof on people making the charge of systemic racism. In fact, it is on those who deny it.

#4, I recommend you watch the movie "Dr. Strangelove". It gives a good explanation of how unseen forces (like "white privilege") are all around us, even in our drinking water and the air we breathe, impurifying and sapping our precious bodily fluids.

#3, of course it does. Just look at college admissions, or what happened with the Smithsonian Institute recently. Those are concrete examples of direct systemic racism in the U.S.

#2, go drink your Faygo.