"Clearly, this order is not fully informed by current biological science," said Dr. Richard Bribiescas,

Seriously, ---- off. You're just helping Trump with nonsense like this.

Yawn, another day, another petty distraction. Of course, these days one only has to right click on a web page and choose an option from the drop down menu to translate it into their native language.

Suppose Trump unilaterally deems all undocumented immigrants to be an "occupying force" and denies citizenship to their offspring based on that. Crazy? Yes, but those who wanted to be liberal with applying the insurrection clause to deny citizens from running for office were playing with the same fire.

"Dual citizenship would require you to go through the process of becoming a naturalized citizen."

Nope. You can get automatic citizenship by both birthplace and descent in many countries.

A dual citizen is subject to the jurisdiction of both countries they hold citizenship in, meaning they are legally obligated to obey the laws of each country, even if they are residing in one of them; essentially, they are under the jurisdiction of both nations simultaneously.

I don't see anything in the text of "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" that implies it has to be sole jurisdiction.

"Someone on stage at a Pres Trump's Inauguration event is not a 4chan troll. It is a person sanctioned by Pres Trump."

Those things are not mutually exclusive. I've often called Trump "President 4chan".

[insert "you wouldn't get it" Joker meme here]

I told you guys in 2016 that you were dealing with a bunch of 4chan trolls and their king. Unfortunately, you cried wolf over the "okay" symbol and the circle game, so no one really cares anymore.

"The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" would imply that the child was not subject to ANY other jurisdiction. Well it would appear that the child is under India's jurisdiction due to the laws "Indian Citizenship"."

That's nonsense. The U.S. doesn't have jurisdiction over foreign or dual citizens when they're on U.S. soil? Of course they do, unless they're official diplomats. I really doubt the Supreme Court is going to grant diplomatic immunity to illegal immigrants.

Trump knows this too. This is all just distraction from the confirmation hearings and probably several other things as well.

#10, the same argument applies to those who complain about those employ/exploit undocumented migrants. But go on, keep making tone-deaf statements like Kelly Osborne's "if you kick out the Latinos, who will clean your toilets?" comment.

"Dude, this EO is so ridiculous it will be shot down 9-0 if it reaches SCOTUS."

You would think so, but I really wouldn't be surprised at all if one or two dissent.

"Now it will goto SC and affirm it."

It was a given that it would go to the SC, in fact that was probably the intention, but I'm doubtful that they'll affirm it.

"A representative government should represent a country's demographics."

I get what you're saying, but if you took that to its logical conclusion, then we'd also have teenagers, young children and even fetuses making decisions in government positions.

"One of the many problems with that idea is that male sexual development doesn't begin until about a month and half into pregnancy."

He's equating the legal definition of sex with biological/chromosomal sex. You can take issue with that if you want, but he's not wrong that the latter is determined at conception.

not *all female at conception.

This article and thread are the epitome of "when they go dumb, we go dumber".

No, "fetuses" are not female at conception. You can argue about whether legal sex should necessarily align with biological/chromosomal sex in all cases, which I think is one dumb extreme, but scientifically one's biological sex is determined at conception.

Please ---- off with this nonsense suggesting otherwise.

"One thing the Reich is not taking into account.
'Americans leaving America'."

The US claims jurisdiction over and taxes US citizens worldwide. They already charge a huge fee to give up citizenship, and that will likely go much higher.

Anyway, I said at the time the Hunter laptop thing smelled like a disinformation operation, with a mixture of both truth and dubious information that was completely unverifiable. It wasn't necessarily a Russian operation, but it definitely reflected their style.

Donnerboy owes me 20K.

Hmm. It's curious why a bleat about Bolton's secret service detail was embedded when the thread was promoted to the front page.

#6 - considering how abortion rates break down by ethnicity/race, banning abortion would have the opposite effect on the percentages.

"I would be shocked if anyone let alone a ridiculous percentage of DEI workers voted R."

Honestly, I wouldn't. While there are people who sincerely believe in it, I've also seen a lot of DEI advocates and facilitators who are just cynical or opportunistic grifters. I'm sure a lot of them are happy to get extra paid leave and probably aren't too worried about having to reinvent or rebrand themselves as a lot of their competition falls away.

"Biden did the right thing."

Did he? I think you could argue that it was understandable and pragmatically wise under the circumstances, but I'm not sure if you could make the case that it was "right".

Sorry to complain about the headline, but why is the author of the article "Sorry"?

(Yeah, I know it's probably because some algorithm decided including that would get more clicks for some reason, but it's still annoying AF, just like using hyperbole like "destroyed" and "trolled", or adding a first-person comment to the headline, and I can't decide if this is a Millennial or Gen-Z thing... shoot, I just did it, no wait, don't shoot!)

Ah, the horse pills.