Case in point: There's now cryptocurrency called Snoofcoin.

Crypto is like the reality TV of currencies. You think people will get tired of this crap and it will go away, but unfortunately it never does and it just keeps getting dumber and dumber.

Damn. Just had a flashback to high school, when one of my classmates was killed after being hit in the head by a discus. :-(

"Consider the merits of the knife."

The 9/11 hijackers did.

"In the first place, you have to catch up with someone in order to stab him"

Apparently she's never seen anyone throw a knife, dart or any other sharp object.

Dumber than the one in Buffalo? Can't agree.

"Dumbest motive for a rampage shooting ever?"

Are there motives for rampage shooting less dumb than others? They all seem equally dumb to me.

I would say it's weird that you haven't figured out the tactics you've been using aren't effective at achieving the behavior modification you want, but it's become apparent you're not capable of learning from your mistakes. You can't always get what you want, but if you piss on people who could help you but aren't already on board with every aspect of your goals, you're pushing what you want further out of reach.

"Doesn't really matter now tho. The damage is already done."

So you're saying it couldn't be any worse if Manchin did become a Republican, or steps down and gets replaced by a Republican, giving them a 51-seat majority in the Senate? It couldn't be any worse if Trump gets reelected in 2024? Keep pissing on people who aren't as far left as you, and you might find out.

Good. Keep going and kick them out of all of Ukraine, including Crimea.

"If you look at a map of Ukraine you can see that the russians are busy "denazifying" Ukraine by creating a buffer between Ukraine and the Sea of Azov (or as Effetteposer thinks of it - the Nazi Sea). It's all in Ukraine's self-interest, you see? The Sea of Azov turns people into nazis if they swim in it!
#59 | POSTED BY YAV AT 2022-05-15 02:47 PM

Maybe this is why they're trying to cut them of from the Black Sea, too? To help save them from turning Black, which protects them from American white supremacists.

The first three replies to this thread apparently want McConnell to be majority leader right now.

"Depending upon how it is shown, it may e a racist sign."

Many people here and elsewhere have claimed it's now a racist sign, regardless of how it's shown, because someone on 4chan said so.

"But when I've seen it in a racial context, the fingers are not pointing upwards, they are pointing downwards"

If the fingers are pointing downwards then it's not an okay sign. It could be part of "circle game". Or not.

"Yeah, the OK sign may be used in a racist manner. It was hijacked.
So, what's yer point?"

It was briefly misused by some idiot trolls on the internet. A bunch of other idiots on the idiotnet thought it would be a good idea to give those trolls more credibility than they deserved. This thread appears to be parodying that phenomenon.

"Sounds like he's calling out so-called religious for supporting the "rights" of the unborn."

The part where he called the unborn a group of "people" obviously went over your head. It doesn't look like he was necessarily calling out anyone for supporting the "rights" of the unborn as much as calling out those who don't spend as much energy supporting those other groups of people.

"Of course this is just some stupid right wing beta ---- dumping thread"

The title of this thread is dumb, but no dumber than the claim that the "OK" sign is racist, or the beta cucks who fell (and continue to fall) for that.

"I'm about to do some jumping --------"

Jumping what?

"....with your dignified brains splattered all over some wall that will have to be cleaned, patched and likely repainted."
#19 | POSTED BY NERFHERDER AT 2022-05-13 01:20 PM

Art is subjective.

"Abortions are a choice and the GOP decides those are preventable."
#11 | POSTED BY NIXON AT 2022-05-13 11:48 AM

So you were agreeing with them when you said a woman's choice is sad and preventable?

Are you sure you aren't confusing one of us with someone else? I looked through my history for the past 3 weeks and don't even see any interactions between us.

I do occasionally hit back at individuals who regularly and explicitly attack me first, but not randomly out of the blue.

Maybe it's just the angle, but it doesn't look as wide as Uranus.

"Sentinel - you attack me."

Where? In what context?

"So sad and preventable."

It was her choice.

^ Perfect example of why Trump got elected. You people attack even anti-Trumpers who make a joke at his expense if they're not 100% on board with your agenda or party regardless of what a garbage candidate you nominated. Someone who actively insults and drives away third-party voters rather than courting them has no leg to stand on when talking about Critical Thinking Skills.

"All it took was an average of one vote for the Dem not being cast in every District in WS to give us Trump."

What is WS?

Water Sports?

Option 1: Put forward a bill that already failed because it goes farther than what Roe v Wade established. Result: bill fails again, illustrates that Democrats are divided and Republicans are united, giving the latter a valid talking point that Democrats can't even appeal to moderates who simply want to preserve the status quo by codifying Roe v Wade into federal law.

Option 2: Put forward a bill that codifies Roe v Wade into federal law. Result: even if it doesn't get 60 votes to end a pretend filibuster, it's more likely than Option 1 to peel off some moderates and divide Republicans.

So, even if neither bill would be brought to a vote, it's clear that option 2 is the smarter tactic.

*cue paranoid and delusional ranting from CannibalBoy, et al*

"No. That wasn't clear from your original post."

It was. You're just more interested in projecting views than you are in paying attention to what others are actually saying.

"It's clear you don't believe abortion should be legal"

Case in point.

#50 is choosing to be obtuse. It's clear from what I wrote that certain types of activity involving the death of fetus do deserve to be criminalized, even when there isn't a "flood" of such activity. Including what Scott Petersen did.