Someone upthread said something about a man in the 1950's being able to support a family on one income... Has anyone looked at the size of those houses they lived in?
#96 | Posted by lfthndthrds
Poor people used to deserve homes, but now they don't, is what you are saying here.
That's what the homebuilders and the regulators have decided: No more building homes that poor people can afford.
This is exactly what's described in "The Innovator's Dilemma" by the way. As a business scales, it requires higher margins to sustain growth.
And we are in an era of record corporate profits.
And corporate profits are paid for with wages that don't keep up with production:
"The surge in corporate profits as a share of national income began in late 2020, mostly at the expense of a decline in net interest and miscellaneous payments on assets (interest paid less interest received and royalty payments) and proprietors' income (income earned by unincorporated businesses). In contrast, employee compensation as a share of national income marginally decreased. It averaged 61.8% of national income over the 2010-19 period and was 61.6% in the last quarter of 2024."
www.stlouisfed.org
"Employee compensation as a share of national income is typically referred to as the labor share, which represents the portion of national income allocated to wages and salaries. This share has been declining in many developed countries since the 1980s."
More from the cited article ...
[emphasis mine]