Trump is taking a different approach, whether you agree or not.
#56 | Posted by BillJohnson

Do you support that different approach?

See I can be respectful when you make a declarative statement

No, I didn't. I said even after normalizing relations nothing changed in Cuba. You people need to learn how to read.

#41 | Posted by BellRinger

Expecting radical change after 50 years of embargo when the embargo remains, all in 18 months, clearly shows you do not respect that diplomatic effort

I know how to read, you're too stupid and too much of a troll to understand what you post

Will get back later...time for errands.
#49 | Posted by BillJohnson

Fuck u cunt

"You cannot honestly defend your position"
What position?
You just accused me of not declaring my position?
Make up your mind already.

#51 | Posted by BillJohnson

the position underlying your question stupid

You are truly dumb yet you think you are not

Truth,
"Bill is the type of asshole who farts on a crowded elevator as he leaves and the door closes."
That's colorful.
Do you have something to say, or just more insults?

#47 | Posted by BillJohnson a

Read the previous thread you pustule

You are unworthy of honest discussion

Because you cannot be honest

You cannot honestly defend your position

You are clearly a troll you fuck

Truth,
Why don't you "be a man" and offer an idea instead of insults?

#44 | Posted by BillJohnson a

I did you lying piece of shit.

I spend 2 days answering your series of questions, despite the question changing

And here you are again.

You aer a shitty human being.

Truth,
"Be a man and explain your argument. Be a man and make a declarative statement"
I'm the one asking a question.
#42 | Posted by BillJohnson

See, I told you you are a cunt

You asked a question, based on a world view

Defend that world view

Declare your position.

If you were a man you would do that

You won't cause you're a cunt.

Bill is the type of asshole who farts on a crowded elevator as he leaves and door closes.

Again bill be a man and take a stand

If that "problem" is real as you frame it
What do YOU propose as a solution?
You won't answer that cause you're a cunt

#17 | Posted by truthhurts a

Be a man and explain your argument. Be a man and make a declarative statement

Be a man

No one should take bill's question seriously. I did last week and had a discussion with him over 2 days. I honestly took the question seriously. I ripped his question to shreds-he could offer absolutely zero justification or support for his position, could not even explain his position and finally fell back on some religious nonsense. His position and the question changed significantly throughout the debate. FWIW I was respectful for most of the debate as I assumed good faith on his side.

Bill, like jeff is not a good person.

The stupid fuck doesn't realize Iran has MAD WITHOUT a nuke as evident by the destruction they are inflicting how.

He dumbass do you realize that Iran could drop a bomb or 2 into Israel's nuclear plant and cause a nuclear explosion similar to what ever Israel could do? that that nuclear explosion would destroy Israel.

What is the solution to a regime that openly calls for Israel's elimination and chants "Death to America"?

#28 | Posted by BillJohnson

Asked and answered you stupid fucking cunt.

You were schooled and eventually ran from the thread, and as predicted you are here presenting the same lie

You're scum because you lie and support evil.

GFY

Jpw,
"Iran can blab all it wants about death to anyone it wants."
Is "blabbing" all they have done the last 40 years?
Is "blabbing" all they have been doing just the last few years?

#26 | Posted by BillJohnson

is assassinating a country's leader evil?

is attacking a country TWICE in the midst of negotiations without warning or declaration evil?

is overthrowing a country's government evil?

We did all of that

Is Iran eventually having "the bomb" acceptable to you?

#22 | Posted by BillJohnson

Yes you stupid fuck. Israel has a bomb, North Korea has a bomb, Pakistan has a bomb

If you don't see how Israel and America's war of aggression doesn't threaten the use of a nuclear weapon you are an ignorant fool

Since you have repeatedly shown yourself to be an ignorant fool then this belief further confirms that.

The most common answers I read were some variations of Israel and the US should "build trust" with Iran.
But how does that work when the regime continues to call for Israel's elimination and chants "Death to America"?
Is it prudent to trust someone who says that?
Is postponing the conflict a few more years acceptable or adequate?

#19 | Posted by BillJohnson

This is your brain on religion

This is your brain on maga

This is cultist stupidity

This is immoral, unethical, stupid and vile

Starting a war of aggression because people chanted "death to america" is mind bogglingly "evil"

By your stated beliefs bill you are evil. You are a fucking asshole.

In all of your mindless stupid brain farts do you ever consider that Iran can harm us for our crimes?

I truly despise you and your ilk for the harm that you and your ilk are causing to my children's future

I didn't say it was a terrible thing to do. At the time I didn't have a problem with it. 50 years of doing the same thing with the same lousy results. Nothing wrong with trying a different approach.

#31 | Posted by BellRinger a

Yeah you just mocked the concept of normalizing relations.

I always get a kick as to how much lefties love Communism. Y'all remember when Obama normalized relations with Cuba? Nothing changed.

#23 | Posted by BellRinger a

Christ you're a piece of shit

oh fuck off bill you were schooled on this. You're an ignorant dishonest cult member fuck. You are a fucking idiot.

Here is a way to prove it

If that "problem" is real as you frame it

What do YOU propose as a solution?

You won't answer that cause you're a cunt