You haven't even made an argument.
You personally don't see anything AOC has done as a worthy accomplishment.
But the majority of the Democrats disagree with you
Cool argument from popularity fallacy.
Doesn't change the fact that her list of accomplishments is small.
It's posted above, curated from Donnorboy's posts so you can't even claim that it's me being biased.
Go take a look.
She's accomplished more in her short time in the House of Representatives than most politicians who go into the House of Representatives.
You've made this assertion multiple times and provided zero evidence to back it.
Meanwhile, in reality, she's only procured $.19 million for her district (according to Donnor's posts) and gotten two amendments passed for about $25 million between two projects.
For fun, I took the first Dem woman rep from the top of the list of Dem reps and looked at her accomplishments. She is Alma Adams from South Carolina and she's been in the HoR for about as long as AOC has, having started in 2014.
Her primary accomplishment is the FUTURE Act, which introduced $255 million in annual funding increases for minority serving educational institutions, $85 million of which was designated for HBCUs.
Her committee assingments:
Committee assignments
Committee on Agriculture (Vice Chair)
Subcommittee on Nutrition, Oversight, and Department Operations
Committee on Education and Labor
Subcommittee on Workforce Protections (Chair)
Committee on Financial Services
Subcommittee on Diversity and Inclusion
Leadership in one committee and one subcommittee.
She was literally the first woman Dem rep in alphabetical order and she's as or more qualified for POTUS than AOC. And that's not even considering her background of muiltiple advanced degrees, time spent as a college level faculty member and state-level politics.
Her message gets attention in the Democratic Party. People resonate with her ideas. She is the future of the party.
Then why has she accomplished so little? If "her message gets the attention of the Democratic Party" she would have a longer list of accomplishments, leadership roles and committee assignments.
She doesn't. Because you're full of s*&^.
You never made anything clear. You literally had zero requirements for people who are presidential candidates in the past.
You keep repeating this falsehood. Because you're apparently intellectually challenged, let me state my position clearly: AOC does not have the accomplishments nor experiences to make her qualified to be POTUS. Is that clear enough?
The second line is just strawman stupidity repeated out of desperation.
You don't even know what you want out of politician. If you're not looking for a progressive Democrat, what are you looking for? Another Biden?
Another repetition of a strawman previously used and addressed. Post 107.
You're unwilling to actually say what accomplishments you seek in a politician because you know you don't have any.
Ahhh yes the personal ad hominem again. Because you still have nothing or you're projecting in your desperate flailing.
Just like you didn't have any for Biden, Harris, or Obama
They weren't grossly unqualified for the office for the office. You know who is/was? Trump. And I said as much.
Why is Rep Comer apparently working so hard to stifle any manner of investigation into the Epstein files, that Democrats have to hold such a ~shadow~ hearing, with n Republicans present?
What might Rep Comer be trying to hide? Who might he be trying so desperately to protect?