Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

Menu

Subscriptions

Drudge Retort RSS feed RSS Feed

Links

Recent Comments

Recent comments from all news stories on this site. Users must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you want to retrieve a comment of yours that was recently deleted, visit your user page and click the Moderation link.

ATLANTA (AP) After losing the White House and both houses of Congress, Democrats are grappling with how to handle transgender politics and policy following a campaign that featured withering and often misleading GOP attacks on the issue.

There is plenty of second-guessing after President-elect Donald Trump anchored his victory over Vice President Kamala Harris with sweeping promises on the economy and immigration. But Democrats also will not soon forget the punchline in anti-transgender Trump ads that became ubiquitous by Election Day:

"Kamala is for they/them; President Trump is for you."

Again ...

"AIPAC" is nowhere to be found, Coriolanus.

Sweeping trans-people under the rug seems to be your take. Their concerns are clearly not your concerns.

Interesting.

Jefferson was concerned about an uneducated democracy... so, he basically predicted 1Nut.

"Thomas Jefferson believed democracy was a fragile, worthy experiment requiring an educated citizenry to function. He advocated for a republic supported by local self-government, fearing that a centralized, uneducated democracy would fail. He considered informed public opinion essential to governance and feared the tyranny of both minority wealth (aristocracy) and majority rule.

www.google.com

"The system of banking we have both equally and ever reprobated. I contemplate it as a blot left in all our constitutions, which, if not covered, will end in their destruction, which is already hit by the gamblers in corruption, and is sweeping away in its progress the fortunes and morals of our citizens.

Funding I consider as limited, rightfully, to a redemption of the debt within the lives of a majority of the generation contracting it; every generation coming equally, by the laws of the Creator of the world, to the free possession of the earth he made for their subsistence, unincumbered by their predecessors, who, like them, were but tenants for life ...

And I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."

Thomas Jefferson

Trump hammered Democrats on transgender issues. Now the party is at odds on a response
Nothing in there about your clear hatred of Jews, Caius Marcius Coriolanus.

Not even a mention of "AIPAC".

Nothing whatsoever.

#4 Oops:

Trump hammered Democrats on transgender issues. Now the party is at odds on a response
Again, nothing in there about your clear hatred of Jews, Caius Marcius Coriolanus.

Nothing whatsoever.

#4 Oops:

Five Reasons Harris Lost

Why Kamala Harris lost: A flawed candidate or doomed campaign?

Wrong voters, wrong message: progressives' autopsy lays bare Kamala Harris failures

Why Kamala Harris lost the election

Brookings: Why Donald Trump won and Kamala Harris lost: An early analysis of the results

There is no one reason Harris lost

Politicians and activists are trying to sell disingenuous and nonfactual explanations of why Harris lost to push their ideology. Don't fall for it.
Democrats were united and turned out. Harris lost anyway.
Voters issued a broad repudiation of not only Harris' campaign but the Democratic Party's vision for the country.
A Former Republican Strategist on Why Harris Lost
Inflation, moderation, and candidate effects
What Was the Biggest Factor in Kamala Harris's Defeat?
Nothing in there about your clear hatred of Jews, Caius Marcius Coriolanus.

Nothing whatsoever.

#4 Oops:

Throughout the month of October, 2024, the Trump campaign (and associated entities) spent $300,000,000.00 on ads in all 7 swing states during televised NFL and NCAA football games. The topic of all of those ads? Then-CA Attorney General Kamala Harris' 2019 response to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming (read: trans) care for federal inmates


click graphic above for actual She's for They/Them ad

And the amount of money the Harris campaign spent countering those She's for They/Them ads in the swing states during NFL and NCAA football games? You know, to point out the truth that she was simply responding to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming for federal inmates? To counter the deceptive, the lying-by-omission ads run by Trump & company?

Zero dollars

The efficacy of this strategy was born out election night, 2024, when Steve Kornacki was calling individual counties (starting with Pennsylvania) and highlighting that the Harris/Walz ticket was falling short of votes as opposed to the votes in the 2020 election for the Biden/Harris ticket. His reporting was, in effect, a death by 1,000 cuts for Harris/Walz.

Trump & company knew that all it would take would be the suppression of Biden votes in 2024 by just a point or two for Trump to carry those counties, all 7 swing states and, ultimately, the election. They judged, correctly, that men - men of color and white - would be turned off enough by the "pro-trans" Harris that they voted for Trump, or didn't vote at all.

Either way, mission accomplished.

"Adding two exclamation points, Ingraham quoted from the article in her caption to write,

"Mr. Trump and Xi Jinping are reportedly considering a deal to allow China to invest $1 trillion in the U.S. largely to build factories on American soil.' Trump on verge of making massive error " against aides' advice: report."

The linked article by Raw Story's Tom Boggioni reported that Trump was "giving serious consideration to allowing China to make a massive investment in the U.S. " against the advice of some of his closest advisors," heavily drawing from a column that conservative economist Oren Cass had written for The New York Times.

That deal would be "an unforced error of world-historic proportions," wrote Cass, and Boggioni added a comment that such a deal would be "undermin[ing] the very trade agenda [Trump] championed."

;;

"Trump was operating with a "fundamental misunderstanding of the relationship" between the U.S. and China, wrote Boggioni, because of how the Chinese Communist Party " can offer virtually unlimited financial support and access to a virtually unlimited labor pool."

Boggioni cited Cass's calculations that a "trillion-dollar infusion of Chinese capital would exceed the total direct investment in the United States made by any other country since the Declaration of Independence," and "even a fraction of that amount would devastate what remains of American economic defenses, weakening national security and supply-chain resilience while handing the Chinese Communist Party a powerful tool to subvert U.S. markets."

;;

Donnie must of really liked all that Chinese junk he bought from them to scam his Cult with.

#5 The actual title of Scott Anderson's piece is...

Operation Epic Fury, Meet Operation Colossal Blunder
Nothing to do with AIPAC.

Nothing whatsoever.

Does your obvious hatred of Jews make you believe anyone would believe your obvious lie, Caius Marcius Coriolanus?

Seriously?

m.youtube.com

The second clip he goes over in this video demonstrates this perfectly. Instant retraction. Instant conforming. She didn't even blink.

LOL love the replies from all the dorks on here who don't know shit about women.

www.pewresearch.org

Married women lean republican 50% to 45%

Meanwhile, never married women lean dem 72% to 24%. It's right there in the data.

The plot thickens ...

** BREAKING: SCOTUS lets abortion pill mail delivery continue **

May 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday allowed the abortion pill to be prescribed through telemedicine and dispensed by mail, restoring for now a 2023 federal rule challenged by Republican-governed Louisiana that had made access to the medication easier.

The justices granted requests by two manufacturers of the abortion pill, called mifepristone, to lift a lower court's block on the rule that was issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration during Democratic former President Joe Biden's administration, while the legal challenge plays out.

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy