More: The publication of what appears to be a 22-point manifesto comes at a critical time for Palantir, which faces global criticism for its support of US President Donald Trump's controversial immigration crackdown and its backing of the Israeli military's actions in Gaza and the occupied West Bank.
Many have expressed alarm at the book's emphasis on cultural hierarchies and what it calls "regressive" cultures.
Eliot Higgins, the founder of the online investigations platform Bellingcat, sarcastically pointed out how "completely normal" it was for a tech company to post what he said was a manifesto attacking democratic norms. "It's also worth being clear about who's doing the arguing," Higgins added. "Palantir sells operational software to defence, intelligence, immigration & police agencies. These 22 points aren't philosophy floating in space, they're the public ideology of a company whose revenue depends on the politics it's advocating."
Mark Coeckelbergh, a Belgian philosopher of technology who teaches at the University of Vienna, described Palantir's messaging as an "example of technofascism", while Greek economist and former Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis said Palantir had effectively signalled a willingness "to add to nuclear Armageddon the AI-driven threat to humanity's existence".
Posting on social media, Arnaud Bertrand, the entrepreneur and geopolitical commentator, claimed that Palantir had revealed a dangerous "ideological agenda".
"They're effectively saying our tools aren't meant to serve your foreign policy. They're meant to enforce ours'," he wrote.
I don't support him. I think he's unfit for the office he serves. Having said that, we are stuck with him for 3 more years, so I deal with that reality.