46. I have far more experience and expertise than you. But that's fine.

43 thank you for proving my point. She was arrested not for the bad checks ... she was in the city illegally. She thinks her marriage should protect her from deportation. That's true..,

If you apply for it. Why didn't she apply the second she got married and gain legal status? Why is she only indignant steer the fact, when forethought works have prevented this from becoming a problem. She can plead her case to an immigration judge. She has enough mitigating factors that he might well decide in her favor.

But that doesn't mean she shouldn't have fine the paperwork eight years ago.

What's the phrase? "A lack of planning on your part doesn't constitute an emergency on anyone else's part."

41. Jesus. I never said SHOULD have been killed. I said he was legally justified in doing so. It's willfully ignorant to conflate the two.

The right thing to do and the legally acceptable thing to do are UNRELATED. They often go hand in hand, but not always.

I understand use of force, case law in deadly force, and policy and procedure better than 99.9% of the population.

We arent doing that. We are detaining them for the violation of being in the country illegally, and putting them in front of an immigration judge. They could have requested asylum within a year after crossing the border illegally ... . But if they didn't, can you give me a reason why they Shouldn't see an immigration judge?

That's the funny part. I'm not. I never voted for him. Never will.

But I don't have to view this through political eyes like you.

You do realize some humans have the capacity to judge effects on their merits, not based on what political party they prefer.

The amount of "I hate Trump and he loves ice so I have to hate ice" is hilarious.

28. True. Half a day after the mayor, the police chief, and the governor were calling him a murderer.

If they had just said they were "troubled by the days events, add we look forward to a thorough investigation into the matter" like they should have, the administration may have not countered with their narrative.

I wouldn't trust any investigation chaired by investigators in Minnesota. Not a chance. Bring in some impartial investigators from a disinterested state to run a concurrent investigation would be a much smarter idea.

Or ... the request to investigate wasn't made in good faith.

The governor, the mayor, and the chief of police in Minneapolis made egregiously biased and inflammatory statements within a blink of an eye after the shooting.

I wouldn't trust them to be impartial for ANY reason.

What I would like is an independent concurrent investigation, from an impartial state like Arizona or Colorado for example.

Minnesota clearly can't be trusted.

105: what makes them Nazi thugs? Is it because they are enforcing immigration law ensureingbthosebherebillegallybsee an immigration judge so they can gain legal status? Is it that part?

Or is it because they enforce actual due process and send in their way people that have been ordered removed by TWO judges? Is it that part?

If you don't want due process and every illegal alien to just be able to stay, we can just disband immigration courts and rubber stamp every application. That seems like a swell idea!

The system is such that if people sneak across the border and don't apply for asylum, they are detained and put before an immigration judge. It's really not that big of a deal.

I know I know. You hate Trump and he loves ice ergo you have to hate ice, but try to be a little rational.