-And what's the central denominator?

jobs

slavery was about jobs....LOL

thanks for update Capt. Obvious

That doesn't change the larger picture which you've chosen to ignore.

so my advice to you is to keep ignoring it. keep making it all about politics and whine only about the employer and ignore the larger picture. IOW, go nibble on someone else's ankle. You're no good to me....you simply have nothing to offer.

-People are actually dumb enough to believe that.

that's why it's all politics. no solutions

103

The other half is that the republicans are guilty as hell of enabling this situation. That is...if we are going to call the current situation actually bad.

It's all politics. The number of illegals doesn't bother me nor where they work, nor the social services and government services they consume. they pay taxes and serve a purpose.

-Though, now that I think of it, I'm sure there are a lot of Americans who are illiterate or semi literate who have a valid drivers license.

That shouldn't concern you as much as the fact we have people with 5+ DUIs with drivers licenses.....

102

everyone thinks past immigration was essential but today??? Oh no...we can't have them.

The truth is we've been bickering over this since for 200 years.

Literally the same argument.

-They do? Why?

soft on immigration doesn't help on election day.

only a small faction of liberals like yourself see this through a "xenophobia" lense.

-Substantial majorities of Republicans, Democrats and independents agree

don't misunderstand what you think people are saying.

They think government is corrupt. You are hearing them say "republicans are corrupt"

and why? because they are in charge and this % spiked since Trump was elected again....and you posted this so you think this is good news for democrats.

But that's not what they are saying.

The "majorities of republicans" are NOT switching parties over this "corruption"

-Everything else is just xenophobes using a tragedy to advance hate.

again, a half truth.

That's part of it.....but look at the frothing over employers when it's obvious is a massive team effort to enable this problem.

-I'm all for going after employees who hire them.

I assume you meant employers.....but it's easy to say that when you know nothing will be done to employers.

Nor....

landlords
State, county, and city governments
school districts
churches

93

It's a half-truth.

Here....I'll change it "a man's daughter suffers lifelong bodily damage due to an illegal alien driving a truck and Democrats & Republicans are the parties of illegal immigration because this country would grind to a halt if illegal immigration actually stopped"

-the Democrat party is the party of illegal immigration

The Democrat party has to work to shake that label....nobody wants that stench.

And that's why it's being thrown at them.

The label is total --------......but it works. same with law enforcement and the military.

-Because her car accident can be used to attack immigrants.

Actually, it's more than that......all the right leaning sources all are very quick to blame the State of California and other Blue States for issuing drivers licenses to these folks....as if Red states don't do it as well.

-No job? No migration.

same goes with all the things I listed which you pretend have no relevance.

But to any thinking person....they do.

and where are we establishing that fact? right here on a thread where it doesn't even matter to you if this guy even had an employer. You're making it all about a party.

Everything I'm reading is blaming it all on the State of California for issuing him a CDL.

What I posted in 82 doesn't do that......it's a much more complex problem with regards to that specific issue.

Yes, employers are guilty as hell and complicit in this problem.

We aren't going to get any closer to solving this issue until 1 thing happens........

When both sides stop pointing the finger at the other side when everyone has their fingerprints on this crime scene.

"they wouldn't happen without folks illegally hiring."

I didn't see from this story (for those of you who forgot this is about a little girl who is paralyzed from an auto accident) if this driver was driving his own truck, working for an employer?

But did he have a legal drivers license? We know this was in California.

Are we going to deflect to other places and pretend it happened elsewhere?