I did ask... and I never said, "fully functional":

"AI Overview

Being born with both male and female genitalia is a variation of sex characteristics known as intersex, affecting about 1.7% of people.

It is not a disease, but rather a natural variation where anatomy, chromosomes, or hormones do not fit typical binary definitions. While individuals may have ambiguous genitalia, it is rare to have fully developed, functioning reproductive systems of both sexes."

- shadowbox

Is that what you are doing... jajajaja!

- I don't claim to know.

Ah, so when you ridicule people who disagree with you, that's you shadowboxing... good to know.

It's always hilarious when the people who for decades commit by far the most Domestic Terrorism in this country, according to the FBI and DHS, Rwing white nationalists... try to blame the violence on Dems.

Funny and stupid.

And there's this bit of history:

"Expert Brief
How the NRA Rewrote the Second Amendment

"A fraud on the American public." That's how former Chief Justice Warren Burger described the idea that the Second Amendment gives an unfettered individual right to a gun.

When he spoke these words to PBS in 1990, the rock-ribbed conservative appointed by Richard Nixon was expressing the longtime consensus of historians and judges across the political spectrum."

"But that's not necessarily the case, according to Janet Carter, a Second Amendment litigator with Everytown Law.

"The Second Amendment is not a blank check for gun rights advocates," Carter said. "It has always allowed for the regulation of particularly dangerous weapons and for weapons that are not in common use for self-defense.

That's why efforts to challenge these laws have failed all across the country.

Courts applying the new history and tradition test that was established in the Supreme Court's 2022 Bruen decision have overwhelmingly agreed that banning assault weapons is constitutional."

from the article

So what?

1Nut is a direct descendent of Tank Man:

What will you call your next child when they are born with both a penis and a vagina?

Something just under 2 percent of people are... what will you do with them?

(which is symbolic language, as much of the bible is, for the nurturing nature of God)

She loves you, Clowny!

One of God's names is, El Shaddai, The Many-Breasted One.

- Clearly, must be God then...

Could be, we don't know... oh, excuse me... we don't know, but you obviously do know.

#150

More descriptive claims, no arguments.

I'm sorry, terribly sorry, that you take everything so personally.... really, you aren't all that important in the scheme of things.

You do get to have your own opinions, everyone does, but you don't get your own facts.

Fact is that Brian Cox is right, and you are wrong, inmnsho.

"Physicist Brian Cox takes a scientific, agnostic stance, stating he does not have personal faith but rejects "atheist" labels as divisive.

He believes science does not rule out a creator but finds no evidence for one, arguing that the universe's origin is still unknown and "guessing" is pointless."

"He believes science does not rule out a creator", you opine that it does.

Here take a couple mins, and he'll explain where you are wrong:

#148

I'm actually even cuter than that!

"We don't know why anything exists at all. Nine things we still can't explain about the Universe" (2/26)

- you are an intelligent design proponent. Got it.

Glad you found a box to put me in... we wouldn't want you going around all confused.

- God of the Gaps.

God of the Gaps! God of the Gaps! God of the Gaps!

Ya gotta lotta lotta gaps... more and more each year it seems.

Theories of the Universe, matter, time are losing credibility:

"Time might not exist " and we're starting to understand why"

- why did they design it?

I can give you short version of the Designer theory back story; all matter is created by a non-material mind, apparently because he likes gardens and music.

And the human form was created so he could enjoy walks and listening.

Now, in the longer version, there were other non-material minds who thought this was not a good idea (which, given the current state of things, they may have a point!) and they decided to throw a monkey wrench (sic) into the whole thing to test this theory.

I assume it was made by the God Saturn!

Actually, I've learned not to assume too much about the Universe, per my points the state of astrophysics.

The point, I think, is that it's Information that seems to suggest mind rather than nature... and DNA is formed by HIGHLY sophisticated information, what Gates called 'software', and Dawkins called, "machine code".

#131

Labeling is SO juvenile.

Let me ask you, when you see a new model car on the street, what is your assumption?

Do you assume that it was the result of hundred of billions of years of molecular shenanigans in a mindless process, or do you assume there was a car designer and builder?

Snoofers is right about the Universe, btw. We really haven't a clue... current debates in astrophysics include does matter really exist, does dark matter exist?

What about gravity, how does that really work?

And science has a really low bar, btw... if we find phenomena that we can attribute to an even semi-plausible source, then that assumed source... some effect that we see... it becomes a working theory.

in example:

Matter is an Illusion: Modern physics is forcing us to rethink existence | Michelle Thaller: Full Interview

from Big Think

- the billions of years is there.

Young earth creationists are a vast minority of believers today... and Joni knew exactly what she was saying when she wrote one of my fav songs.

NT Wright the other day said that there might have been an Adam Hominid and an Eve Hominid for all we know (and I say God could have used cellular soup for biology if he wanted), but that's all secondary stuff to people who look at Life, the Universe, and Everything, and see mind over matter.

- Brian Cox

"Physicist Brian Cox takes a scientific, agnostic stance, stating he does not have personal faith but rejects "atheist" labels as divisive.

He believes science does not rule out a creator but finds no evidence for one, arguing that the universe's origin is still unknown and "guessing" is pointless."

"The arrogance of modernity is the belief that contemporary, science-driven, Western, or rationalized perspectives are superior to all historical or alternative ways of life.

It represents a "triumphalism" that assumes progress has rendered past generations, traditions, and beliefs obsolete and inferior."

- the scientific method

Ibn al-Haytham (11th century) introduced systematic experimentation. Francis Bacon (16th-17th century) is widely credited with formalizing the modern empirical method, with crucial refinements from Galileo Galilei and Isaac Newton.

All "Godders". Newton wrote volumes more about the Bible than he did science, and they all did what they did to understand, "God's Creation".

She's also in the News for this story... Maxwell's coming Pardon.

- Intelligent Design nonsense.

Like I said, all you really have is ad hominem.

You nor I have any way of knowing how abiogenesis really werks, but you are invested in proofing how intelligent and important your opinions are, to the point of ridiculing all who disagree.

There are much better expert opinions than either of ours, with scientists on all sides of the issue.

There are theist Nobel Prize winners in Physics, just as there are agnostics and atheists.

But hey, none of them are as wise as you.

"Numerous Nobel Prize winners have identified as theists, with studies suggesting that between 1901 and 2000, over 65% of laureates identified as Christian, and over 20% were of the Jewish faith.

While many top scientists in history held religious beliefs, many Nobel winners in the sciences (physics, chemistry, medicine) also maintained personal faith alongside their research."

He wrote professional opinions on abiogenesis, one of science's biggest questions in his field... how some interest group used it is beside the point.

The point being that you nor I nor anyone else knows exactly how it werks, but you are comfortable ridiculing anyone who happens not to agree with Your Magnificence.

"The roughly 30-minute briefings have included a PowerPoint presentation about how congressional oversight works and best practices for handling it ...

Staff from the counsel's office have encouraged political appointees to be careful about what they put in writing and provided guidance for how to respond to congressional inquiries in a timely manner."

Said one White House official: "It's obvious to everyone that it's very likely. It was a sober-eyed conversation."

;;

"... be careful about what they put in writing"

This is always a good idea in any criminal enterprise.