At Boeing when one door closes, another one opens.

BTW, Laura,

Are you speaking for women on this topic?

Can you tell me what qualifies you to be able to do that?

#4,

And progressives have replaced women with born men.

Didnt a "woman of the year" have a ---- when "she" accepted the award?

"Israel has called allegations it buried Palestinian bodies "baseless and unfounded." The military told AP that troops exhumed bodies Palestinians had already buried as part of the military's search for hostages, but claimed they returned them to their place."

So bring on the probes. I'm sure Hamas will cooperate, since they would have nothing to hide.

Robson @ #99

OK ~ Who plugged in the troll machine?

It'll prolly have to be at a Courthouse somewhere that Trump is being prosecuted for his many crimes.

Biden's staff should tell him he already debated Trump and he won.

Possible.

He drifts off when he speaks at one of his rallies.

Define drifts off, Biden is quotable. Trumps stories a laborious to listen too, but not sure about the "drifting off".

He talks for 1hr 30min some of its going to be rambling.

It'd be like watching two codgers in the morning room arguing over the last fruit cup.

Equating the two negates your ability to discern the difference between someone with dementia, and someone just getting old.

Trump will just back out of it making some lame excuse like with his taxes.

"I can't debate because I'm under audit!" actually sounds like something Trump would say.

This bill doesn't go far enough and expects too much from teachers.

The only way to keep students safe at schools is to arm the students.

Then, and only then, will they be safe and able to defend themselves.

I'm starting a lobby group, Guns for Toddlers.

Let's keep America safe.

I never said Blacks cant counter white superiority.

So we are making things up now?

Anti-white protest- Block roads, loot stores, assault police and bystanders, burn buildings, etc.
All without serious legal ramification. Liberal politicians and MSM excuse and encourage rioters.

Anti-zionist protest- Mass arrests with brutality features, snipers on rooftops, SAT scores brought back into play. Liberal politicians and MSM condemn actual peaceful protesters, call for increased penalties.

Feminism arose to counter the male superiority and domination complex.

No, it arose because another man is defending the woman's right to protest.

Women cant counter male superiority. They need another man to do that.

Did people actually believe him?

Are there actually people unaware that he's going to turn the US into an oligarchy if he wins again?

They're teachers.

#9 | POSTED BY SITZKRIEG

Yep. Just like they're only students. Just like they are only fifteen.

Their chickens are coming home to roost.

P.S. Bird flu

A Funny Flag will do for #9. He's used to them.

This dork is from the OKC area. The story has gotten a lot of play hereabouts. Our junior US Senator, Plumber Butt Mullin got involved, probably explaining to the T&C government that the perp is an American, so let him go. After another month in the cooler, he will be permitted to leave the country and will return to Okiehomie a hero for having fought the evil foreigners ...

Well then she should shut up, resign from her job, get in the kitchen, cook dinner, wash the dishes, never vote again, accept being slapped around with no recourse, stop reading, throw away all her credit cards and close all bank accounts her father or husband didn't get for her, relinquish all property, and keep all her opinions to herself.

Sort of like a Hamas wife, right? Or a Muslim wife?

Democracy doesn't exist in Ukraine now.

Elections were cancelled. Workers rights gutted.

Zelinsky is a tarnished hero.

It's PollyAnnish to think it makes any difference to democracy who wins in Ukraine.

They aren't one.

Russia has about equal claim to being a free society.

he seems like he keeps up with who's got the meat

That's JPW. You are getting them mixed up.

Now why would any man take that deal

You are right. I'm not going to say why, some here are fragile minded.

Didnt a "woman of the year" have a ---- when "she" accepted the award?

#4 | Posted by boaz

ask snoofy....he seems like he keeps up with who's got the meat...

At least they have their cats right?!? Meanwhile if white guys can't find a sane white woman are marrying Asians and Latina women who don't spew the garbage and actually enjoy the differences of each of the two sexes and appreciate marriage.

Congratulations liberal white women!

Oh I understand Syco, but you and I both know that went horribly for Jack Smith today.

Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose.

#3 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-04-23 06:57 PM | Reply | Flag

Snoofy is using Janice Joplin's name in vain.

If America wins in November, if we fight off the forces of autocratic fascism, the Supreme Court will have to be handled; torn down and remodeled. We can't have it sniping at our democracy hoping to kill it as it now does. We can't have it sanctimoniously handing us legally over into the clutches of a madman. It needs to be packed at minimum.

"Cruelty was the point for Obama"

Sure comrade.

It was in Indonesia. He remembered that he was fed dog meat as a kid by his stepfather. Probably from one of those roadside grills.

There was no "cruelty" on his part. He was also fed snake meat and grasshoppers. Was that him also just being "cruel" to snakes and grasshoppers?

WTF is wrong with you?

I disagree whole heartedly "we" have not been suffering under an illusion, just pompous fools who have refused to recognize the blatant disregard by the majority of the need for the court to appesr fair and impartial. These corrupt openly, with grins on their faces, accept free trips and gifts which are obviously bribes to everyone except the most extreme psrtisan right wing hacks. The "liberal establishment" is so unwilling to call out the obvious bias of Justices that I wonder if they have been sleeping while hearing cases. What will it take to get these Justices for sale to notice that the American people do not think the present Supreme Court values justice when they are deciding about the lawlessness of Trump. I'm thinking pitchforks in front of the Supreme Court held by huge mobs of normal Americans angry about the court's apparent unwillingness to take the 14th amendment seriously. That amendment isn't vague and we watched as Trump encouraged his crazed MAGA upporters to g which turned out to be a lieo to the Capital and orevent the certification of the election he had clearly lost, even promising he would be thee too which turned out to be a lie but it was clear that he wanted them to prevent Congress from doing their Constitutional duty. The GQP keeps threatening Civil War and the Supreme Court is telling us they won't fairly hear cases about an insurrection we all watched on live national TV so the GQP may get their wish but if that happens the members of the Supreme Court will be responsible because they are making legal remedies useless and allowing insurrectionists to prevent legal elections to have more importance than liars who value their Party over democracy.

As it is always the case with the right, accusations are admissions.

There's a reason Trump isn't running a typical campaign by any sense of the word. They're planning on stealing or litigating for it.

Despite all of this. Ted Cruz has been supporting Trump ever since.

Republican politicians have no integrity

Zero hurt feelings for Ted Cruz, he made his own bed.

Also, he's got an ugly wife. Trump said so.

She looks like a partially melted barbie.

You broke the internet with that headline.

#4 | POSTED BY SENTINEL

Lazy bothsiderism.

This court has systematically subverted precedence to entrench their extremist "originalism" philosophy.

Whereas before it was just opposing views of how to analyze case law, they're now wiping slates of case law clean by inserting their philosophy in law. For examples, overturning Roe and the recent gun control case both push "historical" requirements that give preference to what laws existed when the constitution was ratified or in common law that the FFs used when drafting the constitution while selectively ignoring historical case law in favor of their own opinions when it suits them.

This scotus is literally subverting the electorate and are remaking the country in the eyes of their billionaire overseers.

News flash: Biden wins 2024 election, thanks to (1) voters in the country, or (2) VP Harris nullifying the electoral votes presented to her in January, 2025. What's anyone going to do about #2, since presiding over the electoral college votes is an official act of the VP?

anything that Trump gets immunity for will be a green light for Biden to do the same to stay in power.

#4 | POSTED BY SENTINEL

It will be a green light for Biden to to the same to stay alive.

If Trump has this sort of immunity it becomes entirely rational for his enemies to kill him. They would be flatly stupid should they not.

The justice was especially concerned with the idea that former presidents would be targeted for political prosecution by their rivals. When the government's lawyer, Michael Dreeben, argued that prosecutors don't always get grand juries to agree to indictments, Alito responded, "Every once in a while there's an eclipse too."

The risk of such prosecutions poses the biggest threat, Alito suggested: "If an incumbent who loses a very close, hotly contested election knows that a real possibility after leaving office is not that the president is going to be able to go off into a peaceful retirement, but that the president may be criminally prosecuted by a bitter political opponent, will that not lead us into a cycle that destabilizes the functioning of our country as a democracy?"

As Dreeben correctly responded, that is the literal inversion of the Jan. 6 case, which involves a defeated former president who, after pursuing several legal avenues to challenge the outcome and losing all of them, chose very clearly not to "go off into a peaceful retirement," but rather tried to overturn the election by illegal and unconstitutional means that resulted in a violent attack on Congress.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor was also perplexed by Alito's upside-down hypothetical, which actively avoided the facts of the case before the court. "A stable democratic society needs the good faith of its public officials, correct?" she asked, adding that the crimes Trump is charged with committing "are the antithesis of democracy" and that his immunity argument cast doubt on the principle "that no man is above the law, either in his official or private acts."

The question the SCOTUS was engaged to answer today was whether a President has "absolute immunity" for any and all acts undertaken while in office. Now that has morphed into the non-asked argument as to whether criminal laws need to specifically include the President as prosecutable if charged with violations of them.

It is clear as day that the right wing is actively delegitimizing historical constitutional checks and balances, heretofore thought to apply to every single American equally without fault or favor in support of the most corrupt, anti-liberal (small L), criminal President to ever sully the White House and Oval Office. Trump is everything our Founders tried to anticipate and created various means to thwart and remove from public service, understanding centuries ago that a popular demagogic leader could emerge and attempt to consolidate authoritarian power not unlike the King they fought a war of independence to escape from.

"Now do pictures of women on the Left."

The lesson being that Donald Trump is an even worse human being than is Ted Cruz.

Which is saying a lot.

Only slightly illegal

Adam Serwer nails it:

That dog trusted Noem.

Yeah, she's scum.

This is what IAMRUNT supports.

BTW, just as an aside, since this "article" presents no facts or links to documents one can assume that this is an opinion piece of pure fiction. The only links are to advocates for sexual predators, so umm yeah, trash thread from trash poster

She's bragging about being too cruel and stupid to train a 14-month-old birddog, thinking this ineptitude will endear her to the MAGA crowd.

Seems like a mistake to me. Performative cruelty thrills Trump supporters when it is done to women and hungry schoolchildren, not puppy dogs.

How come I knew this was a lying pos thread

No surprise Trump protected rapists, he's a convicted rapist himself

You sure champion some strange ----

People are way over-reacting.

No, people are not overreacting. The Roberts Court was tasked to answer a simple question based on a known set of conditions that are real and not hypothetical. The question at issue was does Donald Trump possess ANY form of Presidential immunity for the specific acts he's being charged with regarding January 6th(?) The Roberts Court has told this nation repeatedly that's it's not their job to legislate or rewrite laws from their bench unless there is a constitutional issue at stake which they deem either Congress or the Executive have misinterpreted.

That is not the case with Trump v. U.S.. The ONLY issue before the Court was whether or not Donald Trump has inherent constitutionally-based immunity from prosecution for the criminal acts he's charged with committing on and around January 6th and his conspiracy to illegally remain in office against the expressed will of voters and the constitutional process of presidential succession.

Worrying about what presidential actions are "core" or "not core" is not germane to answering the precise question put before the SCOTUS. And the most insidious aspect of Alito's meandering rant is that he completely ignores that no former President EVER has been charged with a crime expressly by his successor - including Trump. So what basis of fact is his hypothetical point based on? N-O-N-E!

President Biden has nothing to do with the DOJ investigating and charging Donald Trump, but if one listens to Alito, that is the direct allusion his questioning promotes. No one is asking today's SCOTUS to set parameters for presidential conduct but for the SCOTUS itself. Instead of sticking to what has already occurred under an actual President, hours were wasted on hypotheticals which don't address the ripe issue they injected themselves into.

Presidents place their hand on a bible and swear to faithfully execute our laws under the Constitution. Unlike most every other President not named Nixon, Trump not only broke his oath by conspiring against the Constitution, he's now trying to undermine that Constitution in alliance with corrupted judges placing the protection of fantasy before the prosecution of criminality, turning the Constitution on its head.

The supreme conservative six should just rule Trump is immune from the law.

That's pretty much what this is all about.

Allowing Trump to get away with what no one else would be able to.

How it's selling:

Ron Filipkowski
@RonFilipkowski

I can just tell you that Kristi Noem is getting destroyed by MAGA online. This is very bipartisan. Not really sure how she thought writing that in her book was anything other than career suicide. Then again, she hooked up with Corey Lewandowski, so judgment is lacking. Allegedly

Rick Wilson
@TheRickWilson

Kristi Noem is trash.

Decades with hunting- and bird-dogs, and the number I've killed because they were chicken-sharp or had too much prey drive is ZERO. Puppies need slow exposure to birds, and bird-scent.

She killed a puppy because she was lazy at training bird dogs, not because it was a bad dog.

Not every dog is for the field, but 99.9% of them are trainable or re-homeable. We have one now who was never going in the field, but I didn't kill her. She's sleeping on the couch.

You down old dogs, hurt dogs, and sick dogs humanely, not by shooting them and tossing them in a gravel pit.

Unsporting and deliberately cruel...but she wrote this to prove the cruelty is the point.