SDSU is a party school so this is not a surprise.
#2 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

Used to be. Has done a decent job on shedding that association since I left in 2005.

#3 | Posted by rstybeach11

Which begs the question of whether the school shedding it's party school reputation is causally related to your leaving in 2005. Just sayin...

That increase far outstrips the global average and exceeds the limit policymakers set in Paris in 2015 when they aimed to keep Earth's average temperature rise "well below" 2 degrees Celsius.

You cannot control the earth's temperature. There's not a switch you can turn on and off globally.

America ended when the SC decided it's ok for billionaires to buy Congress. We are an oligarchy now, have been since the Reagan era. It will only get worse with our present SC.

#10,

Arent you white? I wouldnt want to do a ---- measuring contest if I were you. I was in the black folks line when God was handing out penises.

This renews my faith in the Republic.

Note to self: while the DR left is getting aroused by watching the impeachment hearings tomorrow, watch The Big Lebowski again.

Socialists are the most inclusive and kind people, as long you agree with them.

"Hey Doc Hagbard, I have this weird skin growth on my forearm. Take a look. Any idea what it is?"

I wish the questions were that impersonal.

But it's probably a lypoma.

If this were Obama, your head would be exploding.

Not it wouldn't ... prove it ...

#12

Dulli thinks it's funny that his Dear Leader is a white nationalist icon in this country.

You just can't see his smile for the white hood.

- A system of government leaves

Yeah, that was terrible when Denmark did that... considering that their form of democratic socialism is, as Bernie says, much closer to what he advocates than the lies you and Null Set perpetuate about it being, "Stalinism!".

The Phony Red Scare continues.

You two should be ashamed of your blatant lies and hypocrisy.

We learned "hearsay can be much better evidence than direct"

Go with that!

LMAO

Orange is the new white... nationalist.

And in this case, we were all paying for his salary while he promoted them.

Shame on us.

I have a question for all your libbies. In terms of your anger/unhinged rantings, which event is most triggering?

1.) Trump's win in 2016,
2.) The Mueller Report nothingburger,
3.) Kavanaugh getting confirmed,
4.) Trump beating this ridiculous impeachment,
5.) Trump winning re-election in 2020, or
6.) Trump appointing another Supreme Court Justice with RBG finally falls off the court?

Inquiring minds want to know. Have we reached peak insanity for the libs or are we stilling building up to that?

"those too dumb to understand Jordan's attack."

Oh, FFS, I have houseplants smarter than Gym Jordan.

he (Trump) does get a say in HOW it is delivered.

#137 | Posted by bogey1355 at 2019-11-13 05:14

In return for a live announcement that someone is investigating Hillary and Joe?

I hate to say it, but if there was ever a public figure who seems perfectly designed for throwing under the bus, it's our boy Rudy. It's like all his public appearances over the past year were manufactured for that exact purpose. What a clown.

"Taylor said the aide overheard the president ask Sondland about "the investigations." He also said Sondland told the aide that the president "cares more about the investigations of Biden" than U.S. policy toward Ukraine"

"Devin Nunes, the Republican ranking member, decried the proceedings as a "carefully orchestrated media smear campaign.""

When the proceedings so far have only included hearsay, there is absolutely no doubt it is a smear campaign. However, this is just the beginning. I know Americans won't do this but the only way to really make sense of everything is to get the full inquiry and evidence, and then judge it as a whole. That's the common sense and logical way to do it so we know that's not going to happen. But, as it stands in this article, so far it is just a smear campaign and there isn't any other way it can be taken considering this is an official inquiry.

"He made the determination that this show is now over, because Taylor is "boring."
#44 | POSTED BY RSTYBEACH11"

It is about public perception - Dems lost. Maybe Taylor was once a great man - he is a confused old fool now, just like Mueller. Sad for his family. Radcliff just destroyed any doubt for those too dumb to understand Jordan's attack. Nothing close to an impeachable offense. You lose, again...

"Jordan just ended this farce."

Did he come clean about enabling perverts?

US population: The Mueller hearing was the most boring -------- of a bumbling old man I have ever seen.
Ambassador Taylor: Hold my beer.

#2 You're a TDSer. You tell us.

88

still crying?

you're just sad because your following Jeff and Nulli around sniffing their Schi%t and trying to hit them with your purse....and you've been slapped for it.

So are all you TDSers watching it? Or blogging about other stuff? You've been begging for this for 3 years, and now you're in the lobby on your smartphone rather than watching the movie.

-You make a great goon.

I'm mean, and I attack people? LOL

You make a great crybaby.

-Jeff loves telling me I don't deserve the money that's been taken out of my paycheck every week for the past 24 years of my life.

probably 3 lies in that statement.

1. Jeff hasn't told you
2. Jeff wouldn't love to tell you
3. you haven't been getting paid every week for the past 24 years.

This case has nothing to do with the Second Amendment. It does not attack or address the right of any person to own any firearm in any way.

What this case is about is a gunmaker's potential liability for their knowing and willful marketing of a weapon for military-style assaults to inexperienced civilians.

I'm going to try in vain to preempt all the "hurr durr it's a legal product" comments from our resident gun freaks.

Connecticut has a state law on the books (Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act) which in part, confers a right of action for personal injury damages on anyone who is harmed by marketing which promotes the use of a product for criminal purposes. The Connecticut Supreme Court has already sided with the plaintiffs that Remington "knowingly marketed, advertised, and promoted the XM15-E2S for civilians to use to carry out offensive, military style combat missions against their perceived enemies. Such use of the XM15-E2S, or any weapon for that matter, would be illegal, and Connecticut law does not permit advertisements that promote or encourage violent, criminal behavior."

Federal law contains wide protections of gunmakers against civil suits by those harmed by gun violence, but it has an exception for cases where "a manufacturer or seller of a [firearm] knowingly violated a State...statute applicable to the sale or marketing of the [firearm]." This is precisely that case, and the suit will rightly proceed. Champions of "states rights" should be applauding.

there is absolutely no doubt it is a smear campaign.

#51 | Posted by humtake

Smear campaigns dont have hard evidence and reputable witness confirmation. Sorry.

Your whole cult seems to be just trying to WISH victory into existence. Like if you all clap your hands and say I BELIEVE IN FAIRIES over and over, fairies will be real.

There's not a switch you can turn on and off

#1 | POSTED BY BOAZ

This is "science" according to climate change deniers.

Bwaaahahahahaha AYFknKM?? Trump fell for the old Double 'D' with a side of Fake Time Magazine Cover?

No wonder Trump hired her. She is like one of his family.

Fake resume, Fake Time Cover, Fake educational claims, and quite possibly, Fake Double 'Ds".

Republicans have neither an idea how to govern, nor even a pretense of caring, to govern well. The Righties here prove that everyday with their defense of this kind of governance. They dont even pretend to want to see good governance when Republicans are in charge.

You are wrong Boaz. In any civilized nation on Earth, the right of my children to live completely outweighs your fetishist desire to own a particular type of weapon. And only a moral abomination would say otherwise.

Socialists are the most inclusive and kind people, as long you agree with them.

Today's witnesses weren't firsthand?
Interesting.

#178 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

Depends on how you define "firsthand". Or how far they are willing to move the goalposts back.

This is the ambassador to Ukraine. He has "firsthand" knowledge of Ukraine and how they were reacting to all of Trump's BS. But conservatives only "believe" evidence of someone directly confessing to a crime (all other evidence is hearsay or a "deep state" conspiracy), and the witnesses today did not directly talk to Trump, so of course they have not heard him confess. Hence, they claim nothing they said is "firsthand".

And no one who actually talked to Trump is allowed to testify, so we will NEVER have "firsthand" testimony. Convenient, eh?

And conservatives (like you) don't care. Though you claim to support impeachment, but are always pushing those goalposts back to ensure it is unobtainable. It is all about winning one more victory for your tribe. No matter the damage it does to this country or its institutions.

Ambassador Taylor: Hold my beer.
#9 | POSTED BY IRAGOLDBERG

It's telling that you find a credible figure such as Taylor's corroboration that the President attempted to bribe a foreign country's president, to politically benefit in an upcoming election, as boring or a ---- show.

Incredibly telling.

So why did the Dems vote to have an open investigation as long as they can veto Republican witnesses and questions.

#21 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

Because Republicans would do stupid crap like try to subpoena Hunter Biden, or the whistleblower.

Also, as a conservative you no idea what is in the law or the constitution, but there is no law saying how impeachment inquiries are supposed to run. And the constitution ALSO says almost NOTHING about how they are supposed to be run. It is left up to the discretion of Congress (specifically the House).
But, these are being run very similarly to how CONSERVATIVES ran the Clinton impeachment, as well as the Benghazi hearings. If you think the precedent that conservatives set was improper and should be overturned, then say that. But if you are going to claim that they don't follow the law, or the constitution (or that they are being "unfair"), you need to present SOME SORT of evidence or argument that supports that assertion. Instead of just regurgitating right-wing talking points that you previously guzzled down.

When the Durham report comes out we will see how wrong you are again.

Hahhahahahaha. The supposed "impropriety" that Durham is supposed to be investigating is that the Obama unfairly "targeted" the Trump campaign for investigations. It is a BS "nothingburger" (as you would call it) because the Obama administration followed proper procedure (and it was kept under wraps so it didn't affect the election), but even if something does come of it at least Obama did it with warrants and judges and through the American judicial system. What American judge (however improperly) signed off on the Trump Administration initiating an investigation into Hunter Biden in Ukraine???? That is the way things are supposed to happen. If the US government (executive branch) is going to go after someone, they have to go through the checks of the Judicial system (checks and balances built into the constitution). You think that the Obama administration "lied" to a judge. The Trump administration just circumvented the judge and warrant part entirely.

So, if you think that Durham COULD POSSIBLY find something on Obama, then you have to admit that what Trump did was way out of bounds. Well... you don't "have to" admit it. You would only "have to" if you had any intellectual honesty. But, you are a conservative so that is not expected of you.

There is no minimum wage low enough to stop the onward march of automation. Automation is not replacing just low wage jobs, it is the forefront of technology. Those Stem jobs everyone is preparing for can all be done by a computer. We are in the 6th generation of computers designed by computers. Cloud means instead of building a brick and mortar datacenter and buyin equipment and cooling and power and licensing and support people that can cost millions of dollars per year a company can build a virtual datacenter for 1/10th the cost and let Amazon or Google worry about the physical maintenance.

It's really that I can see and smell the high blood pressure here from some of you (please, don't try to deny it) and it's tempting.
I am fine if they hang Trump.

#190 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Some people are just being confronted with the fact that Republicans will protect Trump regardless of what comes out. They see the testimony, which is clear and should be devastating, from unimpeachable witnesses, yet still the sycophants pile in here and say there was nothing there.

It is clear there is NOTHING that Trump could do that conservatives would impeach him for.

And that is a very hard concept to digest for someone who actually care about this country.

Don't worry... they will get over it eventually. All they have to do is accept that a large portion of their countrymen are unworthy of their respect. Not an easy pill to swallow, but you survive and move on.

Is this too tough of a question for folks to understand?
#183 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Your ignorance of the topic should keep you at bay, yet here you are, trying to hold people to truths you are unaware of.

Enough others have corroborated what the whistleblower alleged.
#159 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

Do BOGEY a favor and explain that to him in Right Wing language he would understand.

Clearly, he and many other Trumpers, simply don't get it.

I hate to say it, but if there was ever a public figure who seems perfectly designed for throwing under the bus, it's our boy Rudy. It's like all his public appearances over the past year were manufactured for that exact purpose. What a clown.

you must believe that Hunter Biden and Joe Biden are totally free from corruption.

#39 | Posted by iragoldberg at

Do you believe that Trump is totally free from corruption?

If you say no in regards to the man who stole money from charities, students, and veterans then you prove yourself the aching bastard we know yu to be.

If you say yes then by your own "logic" impeaching Trump is necessary.

Take it up with the 2nd Amendment.

#9 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

You talking about the one that talks about "A well-regulated militia"?

It was conservative activist judges that decided the second amendment applied to an INDIVIDUAL right to bear arms. The constitution guarantees no such thing.

It is just pushback on conservatives being extremists.

Socialism is seen as the counterbalance to capitalism.

Conservatives want to deregulate everything and redistribute income upwards in the name of "capitalism". People see that this is "bad" for society so they their support swings in the other direction... "Socialism". When most people talk about "socialism" they are using the modern colloquial definition, not the actual definition.

Really, increased support for "socialism" is just an indictment on how crappy conservatives are at implementing capitalism. Capitalism is a very powerful tool that can vastly increase the productivity of a society. But, it also has its negatives (tendency towards monopoly, corruption, using your "capital" to change the rules in your favor). The problem is that conservatives support capitalism with blind faith, very similar to a religion, that EVERYTHING about capitalism is "good". This has resulted in the negatives of capitalism not being properly curtailed by society (government), so people turn against "capitalism" because of how they see it being misused and see it as "bad".

It is very similar to gun control. We could have common sense gun control where we ensure that people who own guns are responsible and accountable and I believe that we would settle in a happy equilibrium with a vast majority of the country happy with where it stands. But, conservatives are extremist and fight any common sense regulation. So, it will probably end up that instead of finding a happy medium the pendulum is being held back so far right now that once it moves it will swing way over to the other side. Very inefficient and ineffective, but that is what you get when your party gets held hostage by extremists.

Not sure about this ...

Not from a firearm perspective.

But a product development perspective.

Can we hold automobile manufacture liable for wrongful death because the vehicle can go over the speed limit?

Can we hold wine makers liable for drinking and driving?

Can we hold game manufactures liable for teens dying at their keyboards?

Meaning people use products in unlawful ways, does that make the product manufacture liable?

"The word "socialism" has left behind its past of breadlines and beatings and has come to mean something like "kindness" for some students at Georgetown University, The Daily Signal found in campus interviews. "

Cuz there have never been breadline nor beatings in non-socialist nations. What a pile of horse manure.

"Admit it: when Democrats get paid, that's proof of corruption, but when Republicans get paid, that's being a good businessman.
#281 | POSTED BY DANFORTH "

No - it is corruption on both accounts. But because our government is incompetent, no one is ever prosecuted for it. I know this and so does everyone else - except you apparently. That is why I want to shrink the size of the government. The only way to limit corruption is to limit government power so they have less to sell via bribes - and yes, speeches for millions of dollars after leaving office is nothing more than a delayed bribe.

"Parks, elementary & secondary education, police & fire, libraries, roads...all sociallistic aspects. This has nothing to do with elections, and all to do with an admission of reality."

Socialistic?

They're all funded through non-government activity. They exist because taxpayers are willing to fund them.

You guys are obviously taking out your intense frustration on Jeff here.
Which is entertaining to be sure.
#240 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Only because he seemed to be sincerely on the fence, indicating he might be convinced. After today, the frustration of failing to convince people with perspectives such as his has begun to boil. My blood pressure is relative to those who seemingly choose ignorance over reality, not relative to how the hearings are playing out. The evidence is on the table; people like JEFF and Graham who refuse to look are God damn frustrating.

It's not surprising you find this entertaining considering you chose not to pay attention today.

the states said Trump won..

Why do I have to keep educating you?

#31 | Posted by boaz

Nope. Actually unelected anonymous ELECTORS did. They are the ones who actually pick the president. They get a RECOMMENDATION from their citizens, and they are actually supposed to ignore that recommendation if the citizens select someone unqualified, like a lifelong con artist and moronic racist. They didnt do their jobs so they dont deserve them. They failed to perform the one reason they exist.

star witnesses aren't even witnesses! they witnessed a witness of a witness of a witness of a witness! hell it looked like the Star witness Taylor was laughing at the Dems

#141 | Posted by Maverick

Maybe you should tell your cult leader to stop blocking the first hand witnesses from testifying. That's what an innocent man would do isnt' it?