Not when the stock is Enron.
#5 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

it says "Stocks", as in a collection, more than one, this is probably why you've done so poorly, just an inability to read and comprehend.

That being said, I have stated this over and over again regarding California. It has the highest income inequality in the US.

Yeah it's almost like when they sign a treaty with the USA, a new president comes in and just rips it up because he's jealous that the treaty signer had a bigger blacker dick than his.
#74 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY

What treaty has the US ever signed with Iran? I looked but couldn't find anything.

Madbomber has lived in a socialist system that has taken care of him his entire life and continues to do so.

Thats not an argument, thats an ad hominem attack on where he chooses to live.

You might as well say all the anti-capitalist should join him? No?

It's splitting hairs over the federal tax obligation of someone making $46K a year.

This is the whole game he's playing, being "literal", knowing all the buzz words, but doesn't understand how they work in real world.

#72 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

His link was pretty clear, he's just using data provided by IRS? Can you not understand IRS data tables? Use ChatGPT, thats what Corky would do.

While it appears the controller gave clearance, and did mess up, it wasn't the primary reason for the accident.

The runway status lights (there are various kinds) were activated and the driver of the emergency vehicle proceeded anyway. In one of the videos, the "company of vehicles" stopped, the lead vehicle did not.

Press Release
Five More Plead Guilty in Feeding Our Future Fraud Scheme
March 20, 2026

Call me crazy but isn't that what this thread is about?

Like I had stated about Gaslighter, and have been proven true again and again, he/she never reads what the alias cuts and pastes.

That's just the past week.
#1 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

You make it sounds like the justice department is doing a great job, why don't you post a thread on it, instead of deflecting?

#2 | POSTED BY CORKY AT 2026-03-23 08:10 PM | FLAG: WhatAboutTrumpIsm

Kurt Vonnegut?
#26 | POSTED BY DOC_SARVIS

Interesting choice, he died of TBI right?

Alexander Fraser Tytler

He identified "Eight Stages of a Democracy", from beginning to end.
1. ------- to spiritual faith.
2. Spiritual faith to great courage.
3. Courage to liberty.
4. Liberty to abundance.
5. Abundance to complacency.
6. Complacency to apathy.
7. Apathy to dependence.
8. Dependence back to -------.

"A democracy can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship".

Guess which stage America is?

You're a Chinese immigrant, don't makes sense you're not aware of American history.

You offer no proof of your assertion.

I offer the perspective of the greatest historian, documentor and philosopher in American history. Do you know who that was?

Example: Argentina got $40 Billion to bail out it's failed economy.
#16 | POSTED BY REDIAL

Of course DialAgain needs to deflect. Because he doesn't understand what he's talking about.

See this is the financial illiteracy of Lumpers.Trump had a $20 billion currency exchange which hasn't lost ANY value ergo its not spent money; The other $20 billion was in private bank loans.

Our country won't be able to survive Republicans

State, Local, Federal government spending just keep eating up more and more of the GDP. Remember GDP has government spending included, ergo the private economy keeps shrinking ...

Blaming one party is how the US got to this party.

More tax cuts for billionaires should fix it.
------- morons.
#6 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY

You're clueless. The US government, regardless of the revenue, will spend beyond revenue.

Taxation isn't the problem. As I have been saying for sometime, spending is the issue.

You don't even know where its going...

Example: Stacey Abrams NGO was created 30 days before it received $2 billion dollars.

Looking a lot like the man who knew too much had to be eliminated.
#4 | POSTED BY CBOB

Mueller took his statements and let him off easy.

Why is anything related to Epstein at the prison or the prison division? This is all so ridiculous at this point.

Someone at work mentioned to me, regardless of party, the name of the bill indicates the exact opposite of what it will deliver.

It cuts both ways.

Why would you not want your leaders sons or daughters to be involved in a war?

A significant concern is that if a leaders child were in combat, it would compromise the leader's ability to focus solely on the country's needs, as they would be preoccupied with their child's safety. The leader would avoid war when it is necessary.

What I find interesting is America is a Democratic/Republic, the President in all cases of sending troops in harms way, should have to at least be clear with the American people about why we are going, present the case. Let the debate happen at least in the public sphere.

All too often it feels like Congress abdicated its authority, then complains about the executive branch acting independently.

Its all a grift.

Pedo really needs to start taking his meds.
#17 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT

Speaking of meds, I notice both TruthNLies and A_MORON are doing better.

Funny thing about "Plonks", seems like Lumpers do the most "plonking".

Why is that?
Do they only like to read their own opinions?
I mean I get it if the person spams, or post annoying images 99% of the time. But really other than that why would you come here, and block people you disagree with?

I notice that DialAgain and Gaslighter could put together 30 posts agreeing with each other and saying sorry to each other "that they weren't in disagreement".
Whats wrong with disagreement?
When they talk about the "progressive bubble" they mean it, its self induced idiocy.

Pissing off MagaTards is my new hobby.
#10 | POSTED BY A_MONSON

You needed a new hobby.

@#9, 10

Add that to the upcoming "No Kings" rallies next Saturday (March 28) ...
#11 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

Oh yeah, you got the job....

That current trolling alias seems to desperately want replies, almost as if it may be paid on a per-reply basis.

Dude you post here 10X more than I do, you even reply to yourself.

Ah, well... one day you'll have to actually demonstrate that, because it's never happened yet.

Why would I care? Seriously why do you imagine I care what you or anyone else thinks about anything?

But because of your protest of me "thinking I am smarter than everyone", tells me I have already demonstrated it

Yeah here we go ...

First Reported by "AV News Crew"

In March 2026, two significant crises converged for the Dolores Huerta Foundation (DHF): a detailed whistleblower and wrongful termination lawsuit filed by former employee Ruth Sanchez, and a historic public allegation of sexual abuse by Dolores Huerta against the late labor icon Csar Chvez.

The Ruth Sanchez Lawsuit

Filed in September 2025 (Sanchez v. Dolores C. Huerta Foundation), the complaint alleges multiple labor violations, including wage theft, retaliation, and disability discrimination, following a dispute over a city grant. The lawsuit involves allegations of mismanagement and nepotism within the organization. A jury trial is scheduled for early 2028.

Timing of Allegations Against Csar Chvez
In March 2026, roughly two weeks after a key hearing in the Sanchez case, Huerta publicly accused Chvez of sexual assault in the 1960s. These claims followed a New York Times report exploring allegations against the labor leader. Critics have suggested the timing of the announcement served to redirect attention away from the ongoing legal challenges facing the DHF.
Ruth Sanchez's Lawsuit Against the Dolores Huerta Foundation & the Odd Timing of Huerta's Allegations Against Csar Chvez

The recent emergence of sexual abuse allegations against Csar Chvez by Dolores Huerta has coincided with an active whistleblower and wrongful termination lawsuit against her own organization, the Dolores Huerta Foundation (DHF).

Ruth Sanchez's Lawsuit Against DHF
Filed on September 29, 2025, the case Sanchez v. Dolores C. Huerta Foundation (25STCV28384) is currently pending in the Los Angeles Superior Court. Ruth Sanchez, a former Community Organizer and Resource Center Manager, alleges 11 causes of action against the foundation, including:

Whistleblower Retaliation: Sanchez claims she was retaliated against after reporting the misuse of a $95,000 grant from the City of Los Angeles and the falsification of canvassing records.

Labor Violations: She alleges she worked 60-hour weeks without meal or rest breaks and was pressured into unpaid labor.

Nepotism: The complaint states that family members of DHF leadership were promoted into roles they were allegedly incompetent to perform, and that Sanchez was required to train them.

Unreimbursed Expenses: Sanchez alleges she spent between $7,000 and $10,000 of her own money on foundation equipment and supplies without reimbursement.

The case is moving toward a jury trial scheduled for January 24, 2028.

The Timing of Huerta's Allegations Against Chvez
On March 18, 2026, Dolores Huerta publicly alleged that Csar Chvez sexually abused her in the 1960s, resulting in two secret pregnancies. This disclosure came shortly after a New York Times investigation detailed broader patterns of sexual misconduct by Chvez.

Observers have noted a specific timeline regarding the litigation:

September 2025: Ruth Sanchez files her lawsuit.
March 4, 2026: The court holds a demurrer hearing for the Sanchez case.

March 18, 2026: Exactly two weeks after the hearing, Huerta breaks her 60-year silence to accuse Chvez.

Critics suggest the timing may serve to shift public attention away from the foundation's internal labor practices, alleged grant misuse, and the looming civil trial. Huerta maintains she spoke out to support other survivors identified in recent reporting.

The Sanctions led to a currency collapse and protests which were mostly peaceful until Israeli plants started murdering police.

Why where there sanctions?