I always thought this was also a good tell.

Students are definitely using it to compose.
#2 | Posted by sitzkrieg

To wit:

You're just so committed to racism that blaming immigrants is more important to you than telling the truth.

You have no idea what your talking about, and if it is your field of study, I suspect you are avoided for such expressing such unproven statements.

Nobody has to prove their vaccination status when entering the country since the COVID pandemic ended, and then, it was only COVID.

If you came in illegally you didn't have to prove it, what kind of stupid statement is this.

Measles in 2026 isn't because of people who entered the country illegally in 2021-2025.

Well this still doesn't mean its not an illegal/legal immigrant. Given that there is no "slow burn" its introduction across the country, in to the US is NEW, thus immigrant related. The only way a slow burn happens is with reintroduction from NEW people that are contagious into the vaccinated population.

Anti-vaccination proponents will undoubtedly love the reemergence of old school pathogens like small pox and polio. JFC...we're a really stupid species.

LA county has a 66% vaccination rate.

You antivax morons are a danger to the immigrants.

The measles vaccine isn't the covid vaccine. There is no colonization with the measles vaccine.

97% of those that have contracted measles in LA didn't take the vaccine, and also the measles vaccine has a 3% failure to take rate.

Even with a 97% vaccination rate among kindergartners in LA, yet there are kindergartners being infected.

When your goal is to bring the situation back to where it was before you launched the war, you lost, badly.
- TruthNLies

Good thing that's not what's happening

"The US has never done that before. We have never helped another country enrich on their own soil," she said, adding that this was because "if you can produce your own nuclear fuel, you become a much bigger risk" for building nuclear weapons."

This is just more white supremacy talking ...

I attempt to verify even what I claim as a fact before I claim it.

The lies are just flowing out of our resident Bot this morning.

This is hilarious as DonorBot accepts Anon sources as facts.

Not with Boeing, Lockheed, Raytheon, General Dynamix, etc etc.
#21 | POSTED BY REDIAL

idk about the others but you have no idea what Raytheon is doing.

Hey Fishpaw, why did trump hire russian asset paul manafort to be his campaign manager, out of everyone in the world he could have picked?

idk so I asked AI ...

I don't see the issue with why Fishpaw would disappear over this question ... AI delivers a reasonable distillation of the two links below ...

Donald Trump hired Paul Manafort in March 2016 primarily to secure delegates and navigate the complex, potentially contested Republican National Convention. Manafort was brought in to professionalize the campaign, appeal to the party establishment, and work for free, which quickly led to his promotion as campaign chairman.

The hiring was driven by specific strategic needs:
Contested Convention Expertise: Trump needed a seasoned political operative with deep knowledge of convention rules and delegate wrangling to prevent party insiders from hijacking the nomination.
Washington Insider Status: Manafort was a veteran Republican lobbyist with decades of experience, which Trump lacked. The campaign hoped Manafort's establishment ties would ease concerns among GOP leaders.
Working Pro Bono: Manafort approached Trump through a mutual friend, offering to work without a salary, making the hire highly appealing.

Professionalizing Operations: As the campaign transitioned from the primaries to the general election, Trump wanted someone capable of expanding the team and building a traditional political infrastructure.

For more context on how Manafort's lobbying background influenced his role, read the BBC News Profile on Manafort or the TIME Magazine historical timeline.

If the criteria is such that 41 of 50 states currently fail, the actual purpose and effect of the legislation will be to reduce even the proper and justified SNAP payments.

The criteria isn't that difficult. The fraud is actually the reduction, not the cutting back by the legislation.

buckets of cash, for the illiterates.

For instance, this is related.

I am all for helping the homeless... but this is where the money is going, and this is just one such case.

Telling a PAC what to do is called Coordination. That's illegal.

#11 | Posted by Sycophant

Why does the Democrat Super Pac need to be told? My god you people are just excuse makers.

LFT rides a Pedo Protector Purity Pony... or maybe it rides him, you know, down in Tijuana.
#16 | POSTED BY CORKY

I knew Lfty supported Walz! I knew it.

Yeah, there's that.

The super pac could just return the money, as I had stated before. This isn't rocket science as Cooky would leave you to believe, because clearly you don't think for yourself..

Pres Trump proves once again that he does not care about the Americans who have cope with his economic disasters as they try to put food on the table for their children.

I believe the people who allow and are committing the fraud are the ones who don't care about the Americans.

Its noble to want to give to people to put food on the table, BUT that's not where the money is going.

Why do you Lumpers avoid that fact completely.

Can't we agree fraud is bad?
Can't we agree lots of fraud is worse?
How do you propose to stop it without incentives?

I expect crickets from the so-called posters that want to actually discuss issues.

Loser ---- Turds salivating about poor white women with children losing food money to pay for tax cuts for billionaires.

Is a fascinating statement of ignorance; it completely ignores the fraud rates and assumes that the "poor" people are receiving benefits.

I see no reason American taxpayers should pay for high rates of fraud. I recall when I arrived here, politicians held the taxpayer in high regard.

Today, not so much; it just seems it's just someone to mooch off of. The more the government can take and give to fraudulent people, the better.

What I find incredible is that if fraud were diminished us Liberals could get what we want. America is, by socialist definitions, a socialist state; 61% of federal tax dollars are allocated for BOOMERS to receive. Yet people here would have you believe the US is a capitalist hell hole.

idk seems like socialists are getting what they want, but they also want to kill the golden goose as well.

#82 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

The rest of the story ....

OpenAI's AI broke out of a locked test environment, got onto the internet, and hacked into Hugging Face's servers. It did this entirely on its own. No human told it to.
Here's what happened in plain English.

OpenAI was testing how good its newest AI models are at hacking. They put the AI on a locked computer with no internet access and gave it a cybersecurity challenge to solve.
The AI couldn't solve it the normal way. So it started looking for a way out.
It found a software bug that nobody knew about. It used that bug to escape the locked computer and get onto the internet.
Once online, the AI figured out that Hugging Face, a platform where AI companies store their models and data, might have the answers to its test.
It found stolen login details and discovered another unknown bug in Hugging Face's software. It combined both to break into their servers and grab the test answers.
It did all of this to cheat on a test.
Hugging Face's security team caught it and shut it down. Both companies are now working together on the investigation.
The part that should get your attention is that nobody programmed any of this.
The AI picked its own targets, chained together multiple attack methods, and pulled it off across two different companies' systems without a single human telling it what to do.

what happens with the "human surplus"?
#80 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Why do you speak about humans like they have no agency?

The transition from horse to automobile caused disruption, people lost jobs, during the transition new opportunities opened up and needed people to fill them. Eventually employing more people and cleaned up the streets of horse ----.

Sure there's maybe a short term disruption. But do you have one example where a technology has limited jobs overall in the economy, in the long run?

I haven't found one.

Or are all your arguments fear based?

#151

Always the victim.

Yet no one here decried "gay people scary" when turkey or egypt when they denied an LGBT+ cruise ship access to their ports.

I would suspect it conspiratorial.
#96 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

The reason for this is the technology didn't exist.

#95 | POSTED BY EBERLY

it is wild how he just relents after all this.

Pretty soon now, R2D2 should be along to claim Eberly and OneNut shouldn't post on this site, because we were so owned.

I read an article about how HIV was created in a lab in New York City.

Link? I have never heard of this theory, and even if I read about it, I would suspect it conspiratorial.

There are unresolved questions about HIV origins and emergence.

This will always be true because it didn't start in a LAB, we can understand the pattern of evolution of the disease, as we can still find it in nature in some form.