30,000 Lbs Of Raw Beef Recalled

I knew LegallyHesDead was a big ----- ... but not 30,000lbs big

BuT FlOcK Is BaD!

I told you in the Flock thread your phone is a bigger issue.

Was it a bacon catering cart ...

These little reprobates who are afraid to shave because they are scared their facial hair may not return ...
~ R2D2

They're only 21, and this photo might be from the previous arrest..

He has faced charges previously?
~ Gaslighter

First time reading the news in America?

Did you know there are killers running around free in America with 33 prior arrests.... but we can't talk about that because its racist.

about 1 for every two citizens, which is more than cameras than the rest of the world combined.

This is just a whataboutism from the queen of whataboutisms.

American doorbell cameras have worse privacy than Flock, and there are WAY more doorbell cameras.

Flock cameras: 120,000
Doorbell cameras: 60,000,000

Incredible videos coming out on the difference between the construction of buildings in Columbia and Venezuela.

I love Lenin, I love Fidel Castro and I love Che Guevara. They are genuinely ------- heroes.

Here's another PRO flock article.

Impoverish the white middle class!

I don't want to live in a surveillance state at all," said member Jordana Bloom.

Why? Its scary statement ... "surveillance state" ... oooooh scary like communists!

But you allow your phone to track your every move..... we do so willingly for better ads.

Wouldn't stopping crime, lowering crime, be a better reason to track your every move?

Flock, Mass Surveillance, and the Collapse of Crime

Joshua Reed Eakle says that "in America we believe that liberty is more important than security." Do we? This isn't a statement I find meaningful. We clearly don't maximize liberty in every possible situation, but rather usually consider tradeoffs. Most of us would be happy for the police to detain us for a few minutes in order not to be hacked to death. And nobody says get rid of jails because, even if we are sure most people there are guilty, some innocent person is surely being locked up somewhere, and we must always choose liberty over safety. What is relevant is what kind and how much liberty and security we're talking about.

That is to say that there's no way to avoid cost-benefit analysis in situations like this. They pretend this is about larger principles, but it seems that anti-Flock advocates are going based on their own mood affiliation, which has a bias toward the status quo and against new forms of technology. We barely register large, multiyear drops in the murder rate, even though they cumulatively represent thousands of lives saved. At the same time, a couple dozen stalking cases facilitated by Flock will become national news, and while regular victims of crime are collapsed into unanimated numbers, those victimized in a novel way get the complexities of their inner emotional lives put on full display. When we're dealing with status quo problems, we express harms in terms of statistics, while moral panics are written about in the language of poetry.

It's a flex to show Greenlanders and the world that they have no true Sovereignity or ability to Resist.

Can you get any more dramatic.. .FFS LMAO

#4 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

They know, we know ... everyone but TwoKilometers knows.

indigenous people resist naked aggression!

Were the Jewish people in Israel region before the Muslims?

According the CornHolios logic Isreal should destroy the TempleMount.

stating that no military pull-out will happen until Hamas is "genuinely" disarmed.

Seems reasonable and rational.

Spending money, as Mackenzie did on homelessness and food programs doesn't escalate any conflicts, it allows us to fulfill Liberal ideals.

Why do people bring up Jesus if, as you say its "fighting fire with fire", if you don't believe in what he preaches?

"Fighting fire with fire" is widely considered an ineffective strategy because it generally escalates conflicts, erodes moral authority, and perpetuates the very toxic behaviors it seeks to stop.'

The alternative is to destroy what you have.

AI; at least smarter than Green Card Chinese.

If you think destroying America is smarter ... then by all means continue down your current path.

Imagine all the effort these people and A_Moron have put into this.

Do you really "hate" Trump? Or is he the reason you get up in the morning? Perhaps you should thank Trump for the reason you get up every morning.

This is really fascinating.

Countries Lumpers lets crime get out of hand for the purpose of installing surveillance.

But they don't install it where it will help crime, no no they put it in suburbia. Why not put these where the crime is?

Officer allegedly used Flock license plate cameras to track boyfriend's ex-wife: Police chief

There is a neighborhood in a very wealthy area in Los Altos that installed their own "system" and the police need to request access to the cameras recordings.

They're now selling swarms of drones to go with the cameras.

I have seen the drones in action instead of a police car or helicopter chase, this is a good use IMO.
I doubt they are using drones to just watch people without some cause, it would cost too much money.

#5 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

Your link isn't a swarm of drones. So NOPE.

Probably it's because they're disrupting the fabric of society for profit, most of which goes to the billionaire class, and fuels fascism.

For the better?

Mackenzie Scott,of Bezos fame put 10s of Billions of profit in "fixing the fabric of society" ...

It's almost like the love of money is the root of all evil...

#7 | POSTED BY CORKY

idk...

I saw this and it really is out there in terms of money and evil question, but its phrased so coarsely.

Chamath Palihapitiya recently returned to Stanford to aggressively remind students that capital is the ultimate amplifier of human intent.

We live in a world where pure intellectual merit is no longer enough to force actual structural change.

If you fundamentally want to disrupt broken systems you must first accumulate enough capital to become an undeniable threat.
Critics who complain about this intense focus on money completely misunderstand the basic physics of global power.
Sitting on the sidelines with superior morals accomplishes absolutely nothing while well-funded competitors actively shape the future.
As Chamath Palihapitiya explicitly stated in his original 2017 talk, "You have a moral imperative to get it and then use it to make a difference."
Capital is not inherently evil but rather a neutral weapon that simply scales the underlying worldview of its owner.

Stop apologizing for wanting to build massive wealth and start viewing it as the necessary ammunition for your vision.

So no one can use that term but Black people? But what are "black" people exactly?
I thought it was just white people that couldn't use it.
I was under the impression brown people could call other brown people that word.

But I guess it only matters where your ancestors came from on its usage being proper?
What if she has an ancestor from 1000s of year ago, that is from Africa, does the one drop rule apply for N-word usage?

I once heard a black man call a white man the n-word. Is this proper usage?
If once a person is called the N-word then is he able to use the word without incident?
Why is it such a common phrase in rap music? How do people that aren't of the proper lineage able to sing the songs?

These are complicated rules, perhaps people can write it down for us new immigrants, like the lady from NorthCarolina, perhaps she wasn't attune to the finer nuances of its usage.

#7 | POSTED BY REDIAL

Nice deflection, hattip because thats about all I have seen you offer to discussions these days.

So keep up the good work on the cutting and the pasting. elmers?

Q: "How many individuals take advantage of birth tourism?"

My guess is they don't know.

I think progressives (and the true "conservatives") of America owe Muslims a debt of gratitude for helping out and/or expose the secret Nazis and fascists in our midsts.

NAZI's and Muslims were on the same side educated guy.