#1 Just admit you were wrong about it being tossed out twice.

I think I nailed it!
#231 | POSTED BY DONNERBOY

See #228

I don't know about Democrats, but I certainly am. More and more every day.
Trying not to murder is a daily ------ battle.
#221 | POSTED BY HORSTNGRABEN

Americans like Horst are so far up Maslow's hierarchy that they fall off the top.

American citizens are widgets being made in a Corporate Factory to be exploited by the people who have bought and now own their Government.

#17 | POSTED BY CORKY

idk a citizen under 40yo working at a FANNG pulling in $350K-556K a year is hardly a "widget".

The Reagan administration. Mystery solved.

Is that when?

My reference is when they started allowing people to poop on the sidewalks, and the death of Kate Steinle ... After that its just been a ---- show for citizens.

Oh thought this was Tom Styer, the next CA governor.

Snoofy,

Only one yes, the "didn't oppose" is kind of confusing in your tally.

I would say no weapons until 25(hormones) unless ex-military, feel the same way about trans surgery. I believe a mag max is fine, but no laws on the number of mags you can carry.

It's also true that Originalism is only ever invoked by right-wingers, when they know the outcome they want, but they need to invent a legal rationale from whole cloth.

idk but it would seem to me having this as a "standard" is a good thing, even though you can search for your opinion in historical documents, in that it requires the court to go back and make an argument for their "rational" give some pre-post certification evidence as to why the opinion isn't just made out of whole cloth".

Kagan complains they are amateur historians, but really isn't that what a supreme court judge should do? Look up historical; text, opinions, rulings and interpret it to the context; the difference being the top court, there is no "stare decisis" that the lower courts could used to the satisfaction of the SC.

So they must look at history in some way.
The article you linked to clearly doesn't say any judge invents a legal rational from "whole cloth" .. ie a lie, but vary from traditionalist, or originalism, liquidation.

Also are you saying left-wingers are just making legal rational from "whole cloth"?

If not history, what should in your opinion be the "standard" the judges should use for their opinions? Their feelings? Marxism? Nazism? Or ?? what exactly should they base their opinions on?
Its really not a system of government if you base rights on "feelings" without some reference/argument someone in the past has used or made. "Originalism" encompassing "traditionalism", and "liquidation" seems reasonable for a stable society.

You're a MAGA cultist, you worships an adulterous pedophile.
#120 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK

As a Muslim, so do you....

Just more denial from the politically violent Lumpers.

No they aren't.
#74 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

Thats just because you aren't.

Shocked! I tells ya, that some on the Left are for fighting back against Herr Drumpf's Corrupt Fascist Takeover of America!

Is that why assaults against U.S. Jews are at a 46-year high? Because of Trump?

"Leftist judge apologized THREE TIMES."
That never happened.

He did say "I'm sorry", then said "Whatever you've been through, I apologize for the prior week", the concern was that he was being treated like grand ma from Jan6th.

#1 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT

The Biden DOJ initiated the investigation.

Why do they want to be out of Canada?

In a word? Oil, they think they can make more $$ using the resources that are available to them, and quit supporting the East coast socialist.

Questions is why would you want to be in Canada, GDP per Capita it ranks as the 51st State. But if Alberta is released the GDP per Capita could raise its standard of living.

The provinces in the east rank really really low.

Teaching that slavery illegal immigration is evil?
That's a no-no.
According to Lumpers, saying slavery illegal immigration is Evil makes the White Boomers feel Bad for being White.

Its pretty interesting how upset Lumpers get about "slavery", then go an also get overjoyed about a dairy in Idaho using virtually slave labor.

Whether you commit it or support, elevate and worship those committing it, you accept it and approve of it,
#18 | POSTED BY NERFHERDER

This is the sort of response supposed intellectuals claim is "intellectual"

Here is my 2 cents.....I don't give a ---- what they accept. They aren't the ones committing it and it's nothing but an accusation anyway.

Its only a matter of time. The idea that its acceptable by a large percentage then eventually it becomes defendable and actionable, see the 1960's. Even for instance nonviolent campaigns that mobilize at least ~4% of a population have been successful in changing or overthrowing governments. Actual violence? much less.

If the latest attempts on Trump's life don't give you pause, nothing will.

It's always hilarious when the people who for decades commit by far the most Domestic Terrorism in this country, according to the FBI and DHS, Rwing white nationalists... try to blame the violence on Dems.

I didn't read anywhere that democrats are committing more political violence.

Depends upon who makes the graph as to where the cutoff is, and whats included.

For instance
Skin head in prison commits a crime - RightWing violence.
Go back to the 1970's and its 1000s of bombings by left wing activists.

Its toss up, but overall the language of the lefts main characters is "violence", and thus its acceptance. Todays left even accepts/defends illegal immigrant violence against citizens with aplomb.

Also basic definitions would indicate this is true, "progressives" want change (how would that come about?), and "Conservatives" don't, why would they need violence to keep things the same?

Islam don't Play.
It's a Worldview.
It confuses me actually.
~ FootPoser

Islam is just bastardized appropriations from other religions. Its built to justify the sexual degeneracy its "prophet"
Once you understand this, the contradictions make a little more sense.

From what?
#7 | Posted by REDIAL

canadian land acknowledgements?

Another day, another billion dollar grift.
#11 | POSTED BY SNOOFY A

Trump is a piker!
~ Gavin Newsom

Speaking of public schools ....

NYT's @NickKristof "A black kid in Mississippi is 2.5 times as likely to be proficient in math & reading by 4th grade as a black kid in Calif. Do we need to look a little bit less at what the Trump Admin is doing ... & look a little more in the mirror?"

Well it is all owned by Republican Billionaires these days.
And it did totally normalize Trump.
So go figure.
#82 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT

So before the Republican Billionaires owned it the trust was destroyed?
Do you understand what you just said?

Does Talarico's message resonate with you?

Which part? Hate the rich for being rich?

From the decision given:
"And here, the Government does not dispute that, if made to return to Yemen, multiple Plaintiffs will face violence, repression, and retaliation by Houthi-aligned militants."

Why can't they apply for asylum? Its not clear what the point of TPS really is, if asylum isn't part of the possible outcomes (some in the decision were here since 1999). If TPS is "temporary," then why can't everyone from that country come to the US? Is it a asylum lite?

If someone even close to Darwin's intellectual calibre was the one actually using it on the DR I probably would.