If a WHITE fathers whose daughter was killed by some BLACK man in a different state, so he went out and shot up a church of BLACK Americans you'd just call it "blowback".
What you would call it is a motive; not a good one but a motive none the less. A motive isn't a "get out of jail free" card; just an explanation of someone's intentions. The perp would still have to face justice.
Years ago following 9/11, many on the right were calling for Muslims to denounce Muslims for having rammed those planes into the twin towers and all other acts of terrorism that followed. Muslims that did not call out other Muslims for those dastardly deeds were branded and scorned as sympathizers. If what was "good for the goose is good for the gander", why should American Jews that don't call out the atrocities committed by Israeli Jews not be branded and scorned as sympathizers of the Israeli government?
A person's silence should NOT be viewed as an act of tolerance or approval of evil deeds but it is easy to see how it can be; especially when dealing with such emotionally charged issues. That is why injustice must always be loudly and frequently condemned whenever it occurs; irrespective of who is committing it.
It will be interesting to see how this unfolds ...
Yes it will. I'm predicting that Trump will chicken out (TACO?) with the excuse being that the US is embargoing Venezuelan oil; not Russian oil. That, will cost him hardline MAGA support.