The only thing you're even close to being right about is that Trump is a POS.

That's it. Everything else you got wrong.

You don't understand the commandments and what it means to follow them.

You're just focused on Trump.

Fair enough.

Ghettos are a big reason why we have suburbs.

And why people live in the country

144

No, it means I'm not arguing.

Meaning I agree.

Wow ... .you're unbelievably dumb. Or just exactly that desperate for my attention

141

Oh, so you're not actually familiar with the commandments

Nevermind.

Joe Biden honors the Sabbath? Never committed adultery, never lied, stole, coveted his neighbors wife or goods, never dishonored his parents?

That's 7 right there.

And you're positive Joe isn't guilty of breaking any of those?

Maybe you should read up on those better.

-I'd say using the Ten Commandments as a barometer is fair.

I'd disagree considering you can't possibly know how many commandments anybody has broken.

Trump clearly breaks many of them out in the open for us to see.

At least half of them are impossible to know.

If this is just about ragging on Trump, then carry on. I won't argue his morality or lack thereof.

-If you can't, and you still vote for Trump...aren't you making a mockery of Scripture?

I don't know but I also don't know precisely how pure any career politician is.

Not comparing Trump's transgressions to anyone else but many career politicians I've voted for have lied, cheated on spouses, bear false witness, coveted neighbors wife, probably didn't honor ------------ at times, maybe stole, worked on the sabbath, etc...

you see?

Not sure you want to subject everyone you've voted for to a religious purity test.......

disability kept a family member of mine out of my house. He was able to live by himself because he received SSD.

Yeah...lazy alcoholic but thank god I didn't have him under my roof.

He eventually drank himself to death.

39

I don't disagree but it's fun to bag on someone.

Christians
Jews
Blacks
gays
nazis
addicts

LOL.....it's all on the menu here......

-A society that takes better care of its working class would have far less addicts than ours does.

Yeah, I've seen ghettos.

33

That's not why myself and Whatsleft have the opinion of people who we don't consider to really be disabled collecting disability.

It may be a bias and maybe even wrong....but it's not because the media convinced us of anything.

It's because I think a lazy alcoholic should get off his ass and stop leeching off the rest of us.

Whatsleft even says they are all republicans.....did he get that from the billionaire owned media?

no way

31

I'm just saying that's why a lot of folks think SSD is so full of fraud and abuse.

29

I do consider myself lucky.

simple doesn't mean fair

and the lawyers and accountants who influence our government aren't in favor of simplifying anything.

Neither are the politicians. There is almost no support for it.

"you'd been drinking?"

Again, this is your argument.......proving you have nothing.

I know you obviously threw in the towel on being taken seriously years ago but you don't have to cry about it.

take your L and live with it. It's not my fault you're not taken seriously here.

"More money in the Treasury means more ability to fund health care and other public benefits."

really? I'm all for fiscal sanity and responsible growth.

But let's examine that theory...

let's analyze the growth of Tax receipts over the past 15-20 years.

in 2009 the receipts to the US treasury was $2.1 trillion
in 2022 the receipts to the US treasury was $4.9 trillion

over 14 years that's 6.2% annual growth.

pretty damn robust growth in tax receipts.

57

yet another lie. You're not expecting me to do that. You damn well know I don't do that and never have.

just keep lying......it's not like the truth is helping you.

-Why is the result of an AI query thread worthy?

It gave me an opportunity to have fun with Corky....so it's hard for me to criticize it.

19

Exactly....we see this through our own lense of anecdotal experience.

"SSA's payment accuracy rate was over 99%"

what does payment accuracy mean, exactly?

It doesn't necessarily mean that the system isn't paying benefits to someone who really shouldn't qualify.

Because it absolutely does.....but that's through my lense of who I think should qualify for disability and who shouldn't.

I know several people who qualified for disability who were nothing but lazy alcoholics/addicts.

They didn't have some illness or injury that kept them from working unless you want to count the alcoholism as an illness that keeps you from working.

I think that's why there is so belief the system is defrauded so much. It's not that it's defrauded or scammed.....it's that SSA's definition of disability is questioned by many.

-And you not grokking how a more level economic playing field would be helpful to a lot of people... is why you are are a Republican to begin with.

this is the equivalent of calling me a pedo....because I've kicked your sorry ass around this thread and you've got literally nothing to argue.

You proved that you don't understand how any changes would help anybody. Oh, they certainly could.....but you were unable to communicate any of them. You proved you don't understand this issue enough to comment on it. You just post your cute little chatgpt article and shout "yeah!!!" hoping that's as far into the deep end you'd have to go.

Then I asked you to swim in deeper waters and you jumped out of the pool and cried like a -----.

And you already know why I'm a republican and how it's got nothing to do with taking a position on this issue.

Which, BTW, I don't disagree with you on. You're hoping nobody noticed that I agree with you. I just asked for some clarification on your part and you flat out couldn't ------ do it.

You might be the dumbest liberal on this site.

The dumbest liberal on this site. worth repeating.....

-Why WON'T trump release the Epstein files?

are you remotely interested in considering a viewpoint on this other than your own?

You've already decided what's in the files and why they aren't released.

You are not interested in another viewpoint on those facts (they are facts to you)

So why are you continuing to ask?

BTW, let's assume you're correct about what's in the files.

And those facts lead to the eventual resignation and prosecution of Donald Trump.

Happy? Because the happiness will be very short-lived......you understand that, right?

You'll get about 15 minutes of joy, then Vance takes the oath of office and you're back to being just as miserable as you were before those files were released.

You might actually admit to yourself privately that you wished those files had never been released.

-So why do it?

Do what, exactly?

propose changes or actually implement them?

You're making a good argument to not implement those changes.

But proposing them? Well, that's the fun part for Trump. I'm not saying he doesn't want to implement these changes...but we aren't there yet.

-Non-responsive surrender post...

That describes everything you posted on this entire thread.

especially the last few.

You completely surrendered and everyone saw you do it.

And you're lying. You don't feel great. It's obvious.

LOL

Poor thing.

-We learned that Eb didn't read and or comprehend the article.

a 12 year old could understand the article. In fact, it was written for someone at that level.....no wonder why you loved it so much, why it spoke to you.

I guess you must struggle to find articles that you can comprehend....and you found one.

Good for you.

but you couldn't answer a simple question the reason is obvious. You really have no clue how the world works.

Chatgpt isn't going to save you from being an imbecile. In fact, it only draws more attention to it.

"If rich people paid more in taxes, let's say on wealth earned, that money could be invested in national healthcare and education (things conservatives hate). It would increase and prolong social security. Be invested in rebuilding aging infrastructure and modernize the nation.
Hospitals and schools can be properly funded and equipped."

See, these are the words corky couldn't find. Clown makes an attempt to draw a line from additional tax revenue to where it might benefit Joe 6 pack.

Corky is either too lazy or dumb to at least try and muster up a response to my question.

Those are pretty big longshots to happen no matter how much tax revenue we collect from the wealthiest.

Social security will be saved within itself. IOW, the beneficiaries of SS will be footing the bill to make it stronger. Education funding at the federal level is way too taboo. If States want to fund it, then they can pass taxes on their wealthiest and get to it. or even the county level. Good luck.

Those things are all worthy of being done and being funded by our wealthiest......obviously there are political obstacles.

but my only real reason to piss off corky with my responses was this statement he made....." but the climb for the rest of us wouldn't feel quite so impossible."

It was a "feeling" statement that I wanted him to explain better.

But he couldn't. I knew he wouldn't do it. He's just so used to spewing platitudes with no real thought being put into it. That's why he can't actually discuss it. Rather, he just tries to insult and attack his way around discussing it.

-That you are blind to equal justice

I'm literally the only one with their eyes open.

This is fun.

But I need sleep