-I'm open minded to the possibility

To what? Read the rest of your post. You are way too angry with the world around you to be open minded about anything.

It's OK. You have company....

I'm not for any overextension of the law where it's not warranted.

I don't understand THC levels or anything related to drugs.

.08% blood alcohol content has been a standard we've used for years determine a line people cross that indicates "impairment"

I don't know if a similar type of impairment can be determined with THC levels in the blood.

-That sure was a quick 180

I know you need the consolation of believing that you speak for other people here but you shouldn't need that.

Funny, we're approaching a time where We're basically going to be legalizing The use of this drug but still intend to regulate it like we do alcohol and they're a bunch of footstomping five-year-olds who act like they didn't see that one coming.

Speak, just so you don't cry for being the most like goat.....snoofy is closer

Speak

I have read those threads. I've also read the threads you've been all over swinging your purse and hitting people.

I can't tell the difference between you and goat

And I fully know you're not the only one who was bitching about him.

And you're bitching and moaning that intelligent conservatives don't come here and spend time talking to you?

Are you fkkkking kidding me?

25

Citation please

-Angry Dad, Monson and Rein are far worse than Goat by any objective measure,

Don't forget Speak snoofy
Which is fine. I can avoid them or kick their ass at will.

Didn't ruin threads for me.

Seriously....speak....at least be honest. What you mean to say is " Goatman ruined threads.......for me"

-There is no bigger troll than goat.

He has close company in this department.

I plonk those jackasses and/or ignore them.

Some here can't plonk him.

They can't resist.....

155

Or you're just being a drama queen.

BTW, the problem is that you can't plonk him.

It's not the threads....it's you. You can't resist.

-Ban all political ads...

the constitution may have something to say about that.

-When, exactly, did it become this huge problem?

About the same time when political parties started making it a national issue.

Jimmy Dore and his entourage is figuring out Jeff Bezos is concerned about Jeff Bezos first before anything else.

Several things had to be present in order for this to happen.

1. the mother had criminal charges against her when she arrived...we have to address that
2. the child is still supposed to go back and the judge was wrong and the adopting family ignored requests

This awful case doesn't mean we are in the business of child trafficking. We don't want this to happen.

Yes, we can blame the heat turned up by Trump on immigration and that's fine...but I have faith in our system to accept this is an outlier event and hopefully doesn't happen very much.

This is not a defense for what has happened here but understand the life of a state court judge....

"The case study presented is indicative of larger loopholes in the immigration system, the AP contends. Because state governments tend to run child-welfare systems, inconsistencies between federal law and its application at the state level are frequent."

and the good news she has been returned to her mother.

I realize the existence of a middle really irritates partisans. So much that they even pretend it barely exists.

On election day...the middle is real and impactful and it's going to carry the election in 6-7 swing states...just like it did last time.

I agree with JPW....we don't have "unfettered capitalism". If you think we do, come see how much time and money my clients spend complying with regulation. At all levels...Federal, State, local.

"Trump activating white nationalists who hadn't previously voted..."

any data on that? I know that's been asserted since his election and I'm sure it's at least partially true but is there anything to back that up?

I watched the video. He's got quite the little entourage

It looks he broadcasts the show from a cocktail lounge on a cruise ship

JPW, I would argue that trump and the GOP hit Hillary in those states with the eventual effects of NAFTA and it worked because voters in those states are sensitive to it.

It's absurd but that's the American voter.

85

If an objective and informed person confirms it saves money.....then fine.

Offering to host it at cost and actually hosting it for cost are not the same thing.

And hosting events like this can improve the value of the property.

IMO, it's over the line.

-I mean, if what you wrote was supposed to be an argument.

It's not an argument. You are one.

21

What's your point? The rebates are fine.....pennies....but fine.

You're.