I have men's night tonight.

speaks, if you have a man in your life.....ask them what that means....

:-)

the dems want the list released and they're protecting Clinton at the same time?

how does that work?

it's not the opposition party. It's the party I predominantly vote for in general elections.

I know you equate calling someone a republican to calling them a pedo.

right now you can call a bunch of people a pedo. It's fun for you. enjoy it.

-How does the comparison between him and Trump make sense?

just what I typed.

I didn't bring kennedy up...wouldn't have. just having fun with that.

-Perhaps you should adopt an 11 year old boy to help keep you straight.

I know people who have adopted kids...and in some cases older kids. Foster situations that led to the eventual adoption.

My brother adopted a 9 year old. He married his mother after his real father passed away. Seemed like the thing to do.

Very decent people adopt kids and for very very good reasons.

You can have your fun here calling them all pedos...that's fine.

I'll remember that when you're typing "cruelty is the point" when bitching like a little girl about your life.

-Had to look up Ted Kennedy, 1969? 56 years ago?

Oh yeah....we can go back further on him if you'd like

kicked out of Harvard for cheating (and only got in originally because of his daddy)
divorced for infidelity
Chappaquidick

SOB almost made it to the whitehouse despite all that baggage.

This is where I separate myself from most of the left.....what disgusts you about the democratic party.....I actually admire.

There was no place to take this during the campaign....there's barely any place to take it now until some real information is released to leading democrats who are able to reveal it to everyone else.

I applaud the democrats for being above board.

Like I said originally......what concerns me is what the democrats do when they have real meaningful information that's useful

28

did the democrats have that in 2024? they were in a position to use that? assuming it's yes....then how do they use it?

release the details of the wire transfers?

What good is this information right now? What good was it back during the campaign?

"trump marrying one of epstein's whores" - calling Melania a whore was a good idea?

and when were they supposed to insert this stuff? Give up on hammering him about COVID, racism, stolen documents from the WH, etc??

What should they have held back and instead call Melania a whore?

again, what should the adults in the democratic party have done?

"they're still more concerned with protecting clinton than protecting america."

This the comedy in all of this....take note of what speak is doing here...he's admitting he is imagining the list. He imagines he has the list and he knows who is on it.

He believes it's Clinton they are protecting. It doesn't occur to him that's likely only a small small small chance Clinton is the only real democrat on that list...if there is one.

-If you turned out to be a sex trafficking Pedo

you're accusing so many people of being a sex trafficking pedo I can't keep it straight.

In this little skit....Trump is the STP? (sex trafficking pedo)

"They knew trump was a close friend of the world's most notorious pedophile..."

If they "knew" that then they also know of Epstein's other friends.

You can draw any conclusion you want.....nobody cares.

But leading democrats have standards and believe they have to prove what they assert. You can say whatever you want.

You see the difference?

-They should have been yelling about epstein ever since trump had him killed.

I mean the adults in the democratic party. What should they do?

It starts with ...what exactly do they have? photos of a wedding?

I can't account for the criminal behavior of the 500 people who attended my wedding 27 years ago.

-And dems were unable to weaponize this info before the 2024 election because they are useless

what were they supposed to do?

-After my first class as a freshman, the teacher asked me to be the TA.

Because you were a brown noser.......-:)

37

Thank you....yes, it's inflationary.

-It's a first semester Econ 101 question.

and I'm sure you did really well in that class....LOL

The most basic econ class I took was Econ 301 and that wasn't a question in that class.

if you understand your question then you'll understand the "specifics".

Unless you really don't understand your question....but pretending you do.

32

Is that what you mean by "inflationary"?

-Are you also concluding these tariffs will be inflationary?

Are you saying that a pickup made in another country for $30K will now be $34K with a tariff attached to it?

GM has decided that moving forward they can't add the tariff tax and remain competitive.

the alternative is to move the manufacturing to the US (at a marginally higher production cost) but compared to the higher tariff cost....this is the better deal of the 2.

At least that's what I'm concluding from the attached article.

-Johnson is gay?

Oh my...did I accuse someone of something without any evidence?

I'm sorry...I know we're sticklers for that sort of standard being met here.

"Three years later when he married his gay conversion therapist wife, the story became he adopted the boy, unofficially.
Nothing to see here folks."

did you just draw a line connecting Johnson being gay and being a pedo?

Johnson is gay, marries a therapist to help him not be gay....and in the process starts ------- a young boy he "adopts"?

Is that your narrative here?

-True traitorous behavior was effectively opening our borders to millions with minimal to no vetting.

you understand we will return to "opening our borders to millions with minimal to no vetting"........and it will be fine.

-Words have meaning.

Not to Alex.

12

You mean you're not satisfied with the analysis in 9?

-The only Republicans left here worth talking to are Danforth and Et al

Not sure how Danforth feels about that accusation but that's his problem.

But what's funny is that you won't talk to either of those guys.

You can't......

-DID ANYONE READ THIS DEAL?!

Not me because I'm not subscribing to the Financial Times.