-They soon will when the Trump Gestapo hits their city.

but not until then.

It's not that relevant that nearly half simply disapprove.

Is it important to them? My guess is no....not many people outside of California care very much about this.

16

I would have assumed it's happened more than that. Further, I expected there to have been more instances of governors and presidents not being on the same page with the governor telling the president to back off and let the state handle it.

Trump is doing this because it's a blue state and he wants to rub ---- in their face.

"Trump is president."

a 2nd term president.....he was dangerous enough in his first term.

-If they don't REALLY want to stop illegal immigration, what is the point of all the rhetoric?

You answered your question just fine. It's about votes. It's about paranoia.

Nobody really wants to stop immigration, including a certain amount of illegal immigration. We have some very crucial industries that rely heavily on it and nobody has a better solution and it's been this way for 50 years.

But what we can't seem to run out of is steady supply of voters who are clueless on how the world really works.

"Even with all that, however, Shamp said her legislation was necessary to close any loopholes in existing federal restrictions."

Yeah, they should be able to demonstrate what this bill does in addition to what current federal mechanisms are in place already to prohibit sale of property to China. If it doesn't really do anything, then it's unnecessary.

This is where I don't think there is much of an ideological difference of opinion. It's just local politics. A legislature of one party trying to hit a governor of another party for not signing something making her out to be a commie.

People should know there is already a system in place to address this issue.

-The deficit only matters to Republicans when they're not in office.

when does it really matter to anybody?

for my entire life I've been listening to doomsday predictions about the consequences of the federal government engaging in massive deficit spending.

What's the doomsday scenario? calling in the loan? not being able to pay the interest?

we keep kicking this can down the road while our economy continues to move forward. And the government keeps doing what it does.

and we point fingers at each other for being part of the problem and acting like each one of them is facing a consequence for this.

what consequence?

Posted by Angrydad

has a sexual fetish for pigs....

-You were the one we were warning.

there is no "we". You have never and will never be part of any kind of "we", And no, nobody was warning me of anything. You/they were just talking to yourselves.

This is the slippery slope everyone was warned about. Regardless of your personal position on abortion, enforcing these laws is insane. Look at the road it takes you down....

This will turn into a war on ALPR but it's really about the absurdity of these abortion restrictions.

-I'm pretty sure if we reverse CU, then McCain-Feingold becomes law again.

Congress would work on new legislation if there was any chance of that happening.

-The obvious way to overturn Citizens United is putting Democrats on the Supreme Court.

Actually that's a step in a multi multi step process. Getting to that point is a process, reversing CU, and then what to replace it with.

I know......your peabrain can only see one thing at a time.

Let the adults manage things, little fella.

Most discussions here are so far beyond you......it's why nobody on your side talks to you....ever.

-Just stop with your virtue signaling.

when all you have is knife...you bring that to a gunfight, I guess.

-Which party do you believe will bring forth such legislation?

legislation to accomplish what, exactly?

and what's stopping anybody from doing it right now?

It's a much more complex issue than to boil it down to that.

I get it's a huge problem....and solving it? well, honestly I don't know how. But I'm not going to criticize anybody for trying.

"When a shows gets sold to a network, the salaries for all employees are included in the contract. When the contract is written, the salary for each person of a certain position is presented at maximum compensation."

I'm learning something here. I know nothing about the entertainment industry.

A "show" isn't just the product...the show...but it's actually an organization? That makes sense but I never saw it that way.

And in the context of this discussion, I can see why you question keeping compensation secret and the consequences.

-But mostly, the reason to keep it hidden is to not negatively impact morale at the company, when Joe finds out Mary is making $25K more despite being a newer hire.

that's right. To keep morale from the toilet.

Unless you're going to argue that Joe is getting screwed solely because Mary is awesome at her job.

-And what I'm saying is, that's up to you, not your employer, if you want to share those details.

okay. I think employers should STFU on how employees talk to each other.

-Employers who treat their employees fairly shouldn't be worried about employees discussing how much they get paid since they would be getting paid fairly.

It's not that my employer forbids me to walk down the hall and tell someone what I make. I don't care if employees talk with each other about it.

It's that I don't think the employer should be compelled to share my compensation to the world.

what part of my compensation is your business?

salary
company car
phone, expense account
commission structure
bonus structure
profit sharing
benefits
deferred compensation agreement

what part of any of that is your business?

-But... why shouldn't salaries be public information?

well, to put it bluntly...the public is too stupid to understand compensation structures.

I'm guessing by these questions, it's obvious where your compensation falls on the spectrum in your organization.

I didn't say anything about firing someone for repeating their wage.

I'm just saying it's appropriate for your employer to keep private information private.

your driving record
your wife's prozac prescription
your compensation plan including a bonus schedule that's specific for your job.

What business is it of any fellow employee to know that about you?

In fairness, your fellow employee's information isn't your business either.

7

nope

"Average workers are too busy surviving to read long pages about economics but if they could look at a chart that shows basic information about compensation of employees from top to bottom listed simply, I think they would be interested enough to examine their own compensation and compare it with other jobs."

Even employers who treat their workers very fair would want to continue to maintain some confidentiality of compensation.

And there are wage surveys everywhere, and the opportunity to seek employment elsewhere is always present.

IOW, there is a fair amount of transparency out there already.

"And not a good troll at that.
Yeah, a really bad troll."

Is it possible to achieve the status of being an actual good troll?

what do you call the back and forth between JPW and Lft?

trolling? flame war?

Easy Laura, the bossman will change it....but the article is interesting.

"Current law requires the White House to "sequester" certain mandatory spending programs. Reductions in Medicare spending would be limited to 4 percent annually " or an estimated $45 billion for fiscal 2026.

The cuts would total roughly $490 billion over the 2027-2034 period."

at least that's a little more specific.

Thanks, Snoofy.