Replace guns with illegal immigrants and it's the Progressives and Libertarians throwing the party.

Replace guns with pot and most of you would be throwing a party.

But unless it's made in MO wouldn't it run into problems?

#48 | POSTED BY JPW AT 2021-06-16 01:46 PM | FLAG:

Most likely. When you buy out of state, you buy from somebody with an FFL and they ship it via UPS to somebody in your state with an FFL.

I think on the Class 3, for most items you would be okay with the locals but not a Destructive Device, those are still illegal. I would not be willing to put that to the test.

Because they have to go through federally controlled ports to get here?

#42 | POSTED BY JPW AT 2021-06-16 10:38 AM | FLAG:

What do you mean by this one? There are hundreds of domestic manufacturers you can buy from. Many of those make "controlled" items like sound suppressors, short barreled rifles, etc, and they can sell direct to an NFA trust you setup.

As for what it means, no idea. One would hope it's something ideal, like not arresting people for Trump's illegal bump stock ban.

I don't recall

#41 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2021-06-16 10:13 AM | FLAG:

If my immigration views are that much on your mind you should get off the Internet.

Like we taxpayers paid for you to learn?

#24 | POSTED BY AMERICANUNITY AT 2021-06-16 04:34 AM | FLAG:

They're going to have to step up and volunteer to kill people like he did. We The People will compensate you pretty decently for it.

So did you applaud all the Sanctuary cities at the time?

#33 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2021-06-15 10:53 PM | FLAG:

I'm for Sanctuary States on immigration and drugs. It's a waste of any state and their cities time and resources.

It's also why I laughed at Biden appointing a Houston PD chief for immigration. HPD doesn't enforce that, and the illegals are such a tiny amount of crime they don't see police very often.

Good try, but SpaceX is run by a red pilled Covid-denier.

By 78 they mean 74 on the Gulf Coast. It's humid here. Lights are still on.

They would just pivot to Russian, and Putin would embrace them with open arms.

So...do you find the Republicans to be hypocrites? Against Sanctuaries...except when they're for them?

#17 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2021-06-15 03:21 PM | FLAG:

I do. I find it as hypocritical as Democrats that are taking the same position. Still, I can't help but applaud Missouri in this case.

Funny that Republicans would create a Sanctuary State where the locals don't bother enforcing Fed laws. I wonder whom gave them that idea.

Oh cool I can buy a fully automatic SMG without having to buy some stupid Federal license.
#4 | POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2021-06-15 12:18 PM | FLAG:

$200 saved!

A prisoner?!? Hyperbole much?

#6 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2021-06-13 02:52 PM

Maybe a Norwegian prison.

That they're probably too dumb to do that job because they make poor decisions is a separate issue.

The cards lol. Mine has copious information, my wife's has very little, and we got vaxxed at the same site, same time, but by different nurses next to each other. You could just print one and give it to me and as an employer there's no way for me to verify it, and it really feels like waste of my time to do so.

I'm unwilling to fire an employee that can't be vaxxed. If they can do the job without a vaccination, then anybody without it can do that even if it's by a stupid choice.

They're a tiny %? Show your math.

How do you make somebody get vaccinated that cannot be?

Look, I'm not agreeing with revenge porn here I think it is morally reprehensible but Effete is right.

#7 | POSTED BY GALAXIEPETE AT 2021-06-11 08:29 AM | FLAG:

No. Effete is so nuts even I have him plonked. This is not a case where the woman is an accessory to a crime. They are the victim. This is in no way, shape, nor form confusing.

The hardcore socialists were exiled. At one point a Spaniard from the People's Commissariat tried to kill Trotsky with an axe.

In WWII, the Socialists pushed the Nazis all the way back to Berlin, before we could even get to Berlin.

#32 | POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2021-06-10 11:40 PM | FLAG:

Imagine how much faster they'd have done it without Stalinism, Order 227, the great purges, etc. They were already a capitalist entity with performance bonuses for workers draped in a red flag.

So those with medical exemptions are on the same plane as those who simply refuse?

#96 | POSTED BY JPW AT 2021-06-10 09:21 AM | FLAG:

How do you feel about banning them from public facing jobs? Seeing how far people want to go before we start putting the yellow stars on them.

I wish I understood what exactly Trump thought he was accomplishing by banning TikTok in the first place.

#3 | POSTED BY MODER8 AT 2021-06-09 02:48 PM | FLAG:

ByteDance owns TikTok. ByteDance is a Chinese company which supplies the regime with user data on demand.

Trump was "stickin' it to China".

How was tiktok banned?
You could still download and use the app.

#5 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK AT 2021-06-09 02:58 PM | FLAG:

The directive from the Commerce Department to Google and Apple had them remove it from their app stores. It did not effect 100,000,000 existing installs.

I mean I have no idea what kind of ecological damage would be done changing the seasons like that or tidal shift unless we matched the moon to the exact new orbit or weather paterns as the velocity of the planet changed and just who knows how many other issues I'm not even thinking about.

#11 | POSTED BY TAOWARRIOR AT 2021-06-09 06:26 PM | FLAG:

Ghomert is asking rhetorical questions because he knows they can't. It's a clumsy repackaging of the "it's the sun, stupid" argument.

It's an ironically valid question because homeostasis has become the goal (Lovelock much?) to battle climate change, which would require global ecological engineering to deal with the solar output variable.