"Immigrants have a higher rate of violent criminal activity than Citizens is an ideological purity test for Republicans."
Unfortunately, it's your own myopic, incorrect logic that is making that point. For Republicans, the idea is that if those illegals (remember, Reps are against illegals, not immigrants like you keep trying to incorrectly elude to) weren't here in the first place, the violent crimes wouldn't be committed. So, let's say Americans commit a random number of violent crime, like 10%. Then, you add in just 1% from illegals, that makes it 11%.
So, in a Rep's mind, whether you agree or not, the thinking is that the 1% wouldn't even exist if the illegals weren't here. There is no purity test or random, made-up litmus you try to put into the conversation just because of partisan hate and no real logic or anything. It's the simple fact that if illegal A, who committed rape and then killed a girl, weren't here...that crime never would have happened.
In essence, all liberals are doing is trivializing these violent crimes done by illegals. In fact, liberals fight waaaaaaaay more for the innocent person who may be arrested incorrectly than they do for getting rid of the illegal who committed rape, murder, etc. And this isn't even debatable, it's ALL OVER the media in every outlet, not just partisan outlets.
So, as usual with people who are blinded by partisan hate that they can't understand bad logic, you are making up an argument and then debating it yourself instead of actually listening to the other side, understanding where they are coming from, and then forming logical conclusions. In the 1990s, this was a huge problem with Reps. The pendulum has shifted very far to the left now.
"I'll bet you already say "Gulf of America"."
I think it's a ridiculous waste of time and money. But, yeah, proving my point above, you make up arguments and assumptions just to have something to whine about.
"You gonna volunteer for the invasion of Greenland?"
Calling out things that aren't debatable because of the ample evidence that is out there doesn't, in any way even tangetially, provide any evidence that that statement applies to me. Again, more proof you just make up things to argue instead of answering to reality.
I really would love to say it's not your fault because the Dem party has groomed you so well, but it is. My turn to make an assumption...you are probably someone who has an IQ over 50 and can make reasonable conclusions when partisan narratives aren't involved. You should do that more instead of immediately name calling and demonizing someone who brings up a point that doesn't fit well with yours but has plenty of evidence that proves it is a fair statement. It may not be 100% perfect or apply to every perspective, but it's demonstrably a fair statement.