"We can condemn political violence and Kirk's murder while also condemning Charlie Kirk for the rotten, vile hatred he fomented."

Oh no the hell we can't. Liberals already normalized attacking people with different opinions. Liberals already normalized destroying someone's life because they don't have the same ideologies. Burying your head in the sand when it's your party being violent but then pointing fingers when it's someone else is absolutely why this country won't survive, or at least will become just like religious countries who kill each other over belonging to different sects. And I'm not saying liberals started this, just that liberals aren't innocent in any way and have behaved just like cons...and vice versa.

Reps have condemned for quite some time now all the murders, rapes, etc. that occur because liberals want open borders. That is fomenting rotten, vile hatred. Any objective person can see this and any intelligent person can see how they are the EXACT SAME THING. Dems and Reps have done this for so long now that neither side can even see anything different. That's just how our country is and it won't change. Case in point...

"As usual, the right takes an actual grievance, accelerates it under the guise of "but they ddiiiiiiiid it toooooo" and is far worse than anyone or anything they previously criticized."

What about gerrymandering Dems did in the 90s but now they are whining and crying that Reps are doing it to the significant level they did back then? What about liberals who cry about police and then pay top dollar for security? What about Dems crying about if you don't cater to trans then "the blood is on your hands" but when Reps cry about not catering to illegals who rape, kill, etc. you all of a sudden don't understand English.

Once again, pointing fingers while ignoring all the bad your own party has done is terrible. We NEED to be two separate countries at this point solely because of people like you. You have just as much right to spew your ideologies and opinions that Reps do but people like you can't live with others who don't accept your ideologies and opinions. Which, even a 10-year-old can understand how that just makes things worse.

Your statement is unbelievable when there are so, so, soooooooooooo many examples of Dems doing the same exact thing you are whining about. All of this is part of documented history...much of it recent. You can't argue it without being seen as illiterate. You can't say what you said without being a hypocrite. So, why are you choosing to spread hate and misinformation instead of working to solve the negatives your party does that are just like the other party?

This is absolutely no different than the ideology liberals have that if someone kills a bunch of people, we should let them live in society with no penalties and he/she should be free to kill more. One side wants to kill those people, the other side wants those people to be free to kill others.

Both sides are freaking stupid yet they can't take 5 minutes away from vilifying the other side to see how much their own villainy is hurting people.

Hmmmm...I recall when jobless claims rose under Biden and many DR lib kids giving a million different reasons why that were not Biden's fault. Basically, anything that happened under Biden wasn't his fault. Yet liberals still said he was a good POTUS. How was he any good if nothing that happened under him was his doing?

Also, if you actually read the article, the trend isn't any different than what has already been going on. It's VERY telling the article doesn't mention jobless claim numbers/trends under Biden. But that takes critical thinking, something we already know DR lib kids lack.

Now, if only we could have had warning of 9% inflation when Biden was in office before being surprised by almost every product increasing in cost significantly. Not only that, but having a bill called the Inflation Reduction Act that had nothing to do with reducing inflation didn't help in any way.

Liberals would be great and could get a lot of things done if they would just stop ignoring their own hypocrisy.

It is freaking hilarious that DR decided to use that as the headline here. You ignored the "All hostages must be returned" and everything like that that Palestine is guilty of just to make an ideological point. There are so many points here that expose Palestine's (i.e., Hamas) wrongdoings but liberals don't care about anyone killed, raped, etc. just like they don't care when it happens to Americans who don't agree with their ideology (like women being raped and killed by illegals). No, those people mean nothing to any of you. All that matters is spinning everything just to make ideologic points. Combine that with the celebrations of killing someone who is just speaking their opinion and you can easily see which party is really causing all of the violence right now. Rarely does any violence occur from right-leaning people to make ideological points. Since the DR lib kids on here have no logic skills, of course you are going to say we see it all the time. That's just because you spin everything to be conservative points. Like if a racist guy in Alabama kills a black guy, you automatically and immediately say something like, "Yep, that's political violence" when it isn't related at all. Hate just from one person to another is rarely political and that's been true for thousands of years. But hate specifically because of political ideologies is rampant across both sides, and there is very clear evidence liberals are the cause.

If you don't like that, then do something about it. Ignoring it, spinning it, demonizing me for calling it out, etc. do absolutely nothing to change the fact that violence because of political ideology differences is mostly from liberals these days. Riots, lootings, murders, rapes, etc. are committed and defended by liberals waaaaaaaaaay more than conservatives these days and you can't argue that because the proof is all out there.

This Kirk situation, which Fox is milking for every ounce of partisan bias it can so you have to ignore most of what they report, should still be looked at by liberals as a call to do better. Instead, they celebrate the murder of someone because of a difference of opinion. That's the bottom line and ignoring it only makes things worse.

As usual, DR lib kids completely ignore their own hypocrisy. It's already been proven many times over that Biden and Obama tried to get states to gerrymander multiple times, or at least tried to get legislation passed that would have made it easier for Dems to gerrymander. And, since the significant Dem gerrymandering of the 90s completely skewed districts to the left, what's happening now is just the pendulum swinging back to center.

Wow, the conspiracies are ripe in this channel. Basically, everything is possible except for anything that could be considered left leaning. You guys are in such a rush to find ways to distance yourselves that you can't even have basic empathy (something liberals claim is missing from Reps but this channel is illustrating it's liberals too beyond any doubt) or allow all of the facts to come out before making crazy insane conspiracies.

In fact, if I were shown these comments without any branding, I'd swear they were coming straight from a right leaning forum. Congratulations on being no different from Reps.

Humanity has proven that hate is what rules us. It used to be religion that split us. Then wise people got involved and said, "Let's remove religion from being our governing documents" and everything was great for a little bit. Then religion quickly got replaced with partisanship. America is no better than the ME countries who still hate each other because one is a different religion/sect than the other. Both sides feel their religion is a religion of peace and a good instruction book for life but both are willing to say the other is full of hatred and wrong ideologies. But then both sides vehemently try to stick to a moral high ground when defending themselves saying that the other side really is full of hatred, seriously, you have to believe us, that's reality, blah blah blah.

And, based off of the comments here, you guys are doing a great job of illustrating all of that.

Well damn, liberals have to get behind this. I mean, they cite European countries all the time for being the gold standard of everything, and their citizenship tests are already more demanding than the US. So, since the EU is doing it, that means America should be doing it.

I bet that hurts liberals a lot to have to be supportive of something Trump is doing. Ouch.

There really isn't a right or wrong here. As usual, it comes down to opinion. Reps are fine with a tiny percentage of people being wrongfully targeted because it impacts liberties while Dems are fine with a tiny percentage of people being wrongfully targeted by enemies of the state. Reps feel having some innocent people compromised for the greater good is warranted. Dems feel that innocent people being victimized by murder and other violent crimes is warranted because then liberties are protected.

Again, no right or wrong. Just ideological differences. It's no reason to hate on anyone. Well, except maybe for the families of those who become victims of violent crimes like murder.

This does nothing at all to help anything. You want clean air by green energies...then you have to NIMBY. Those windmill blades don't get manufactured out of thin air, it takes a lot of dirty raw material gathering as well as polluting manufacturing to make them. Then, on top of that, any regulations to curb the pollution from those stages means higher costs on consumers. And liberals claim they are for the working class who have a really hard time absorbing higher costs. I mean, liberals say we can't even absorb tariffs and those are peanuts compared to the increase in costs of making particulates in pollution to come out clean.

But, the conclusion can't be argued, that pollution ends up somewhere. Just because it's not in your back yard doesn't give you some kind of moral high ground justifying your regulations on other people.

Haven't Reps learned by now that context is only allowed when it pertains to Democrats? If you aren't Dem, there is no context...other than the context Dems add. This is the way.

To think, all that needed to happen is Ukraine bombing a Russian circus to kill a thousand or so civilians before the Russian invasion and liberals would be on Russia's side in this war.

It's tough to keep up with the flavor-of-the-day hypocrisy liberals cling to but not impossible.

If the approval ratings in the 21st century have taught us anything, it's that they mean absolutely nothing depending on which party you belong to. Biden's ratings were abysmal, yet liberals did everything they can to protect him. Trump's ratings are so low, yet cons are doing everything they can to protect him. Same happened to Obama and W; it's all relative.

Using this as anything more than just laughable journalism means YOU are the sucker.

Rofl. States rights and national defense are NOT the same thing. Anyone else would know this...a bunch of liberals wouldn't since it doesn't meet their narrative.

This is like saying liberals were once fighters for free speech/expression (ideology level, not First Amendment level) but now want people to be canceled/arested because of things they say. While they can be spun to make a partisan point by relation, it doesn't necessarily mean that's true. This is just more propaganda to try to get people to hate another party instead of actual journalism meant to try to get the party's working together on real problems.

Yes, leave it to liberals to try to inject murdering parents as an orphan into a conversation about highly debatable trade laws that aren't clear and require many courts to be involved in order to translate them.

Hilarious to watch a bunch of liberals who support the Dem party in fighting to stop sugary drinks from being purchased or allowed, straws have to be a certain kind whether or not someone likes them, and many other foods/drink situations all of a sudden think it's a bad thing and against our rights to place restrictions on what people can and can't buy.

There are some very high-ranking Dems who have been campaigning on this topic for quite a while now. But all of a sudden it's bad, right? Now doing it is infringing on our freedoms, right?

I never want to hear anything from liberals again about trying to place restrictions on what food/drinks any American is allowed to buy ever again.

Wow, just wow. It's all an attack on democracy right now...until a Dem gets the POTUS chair and does all their EOs to combat "emergencies". Then all will be fine again. It's not like this is new or anything. This happens EVERY SINGLE NEW POTUS. They ALL use their powers to do what they want in the name of their party's ideology.

One of the worst aspects of partisanship in America that has unfortunately become a huge problem is how many IQ points are taken from peoples' brains when they become partisan.

And the result is liberals cheering even more for companies who offshore. Well, at least for now. Once a Dem POTUS gets in the seat, offshoring will be a big problem again. Unless it's a career politician of 40 years who enabled offshoring from the very start, like Biden. Then it's OK again, of course.

Not really necessary. The Bucs are going to win it all, of course. :-)

Free market Capitalism went away as soon as Obama signed the ACA. Just because the issue is manifesting from a conservative doesn't make it any less true.

"DEAD PEDO
DEAD PUTIN
DEAD BIBI
WORLD CHEERS"

The same sentiment said about a Dem POTUS and liberals go ballistic saying how wrong it is, blah blah blah. That's not even gaslighting. That actually happens in reality. Very often. But let's just ignore all of it that doesn't meet our narrative, amirite?

Really? And what if, in 10 years time, there is zero fallout from this? What if removing the mandates causes no disruption or increases in anything?

I'm not saying they won't. I think it's really freaking stupid to legislate a blanket statement about all vaccines. But the point still stands, what if it doesn't cause problems? It's a lot easier to just keep your mouth closed and let reality prove you right than it is to make partisan statements that do nothing but create more hatred. If it is going to have a big negative impact, the data will speak for itself. We don't need conjecture to spread hate. In fact, we should really strive as Americans to get rid of that from our society.

) - here is the missing end parens....

"Is this like 2007 in the buildup to 2008 crash?"

Not at all...it's like the buildup to the .dom crash (2008 had little to do with cutting edge technologies and everything to do with lobbyers trying to make their benefactors richer by changing regulations/laws. It's the same old theme that goes back a very, VERY long time. New technology allows new innovations. The innovations get saturated with companies. A large percent of those companies fail due to many reasons, one of which is because of saturation. Rinse and repeat.

Luckily with AI, investors have the option to be very specific. In other words, I don't have to invest in AI directly to benefit from investing in AI (sounds funny, I know). I can invest in SoundHound to bet on AI use in conversational AI, or I can invest in a Mag 7 company and benefit from whatever gains they make while inherently hedging against a full bubble burst. The .com bubble was kind of an "all in" type of bubble where oversaturation ultimately led to it popping.

OOHHHHHHH MMMMMMMMMYYYYYYYY GGGGGOOOOOODDDDDDDDDD!!!!!! 2.9%!!!!! The world is ending!!!!

"Biden was up to 9%."

FAKE NEWS!!!! WRONG!!!! PRICES HAVEN'T GONE UP ANYWHERE!!!!!!