It's sad that both sides claimed voter fraud last cycle but those filled with hate just want to ignore the fraud that could have occurred on their side. Shame.

And he is correct to a point. Imagine if all the media did was report everything he does that is good. There is plenty of it and if you do even a little research you can see I'm right, but it is overshadowed by the things he does that will generate clicks. This is the truth with all Presidents. I'm actually very shocked there are people who don't know this already. Hell, Obama did a lot of good but if you talk to people who only read right wing news, all you will hear from them is hate. That's because of two things...the media wants clicks and people typically only want to read the media they agree with. So if they hate Trump, they will read media outlets talking about all the things he does bad. The typical Liberal who loved Obama typically only read the good stories about him but ignored all the bad. You can go back very far to see this trend is true and has been going on a long time. Very few people overall are objective enough to get both sides' opinion and ultimately ignore them because politics is only about hate today.

"Is there anyone out there claiming their golf course is a farm?

Todays GOP
Without scruples
With inverted morals

Only a matter of time before the compulsive liars claims OBAMA did it, which in todays conservative ethos means it's a-ok to be a lying ethically challenged bag of dicks"

Yep, that is the Republican failure. As I've been saying, Republicans don't rule by morality. But, they do rule by REALITY. Liberals have a morale high ground but rule by thinking they are in some fantasy world where everyone holds hands and sings kumbaya all day long. At least Republicans are ruling based on the real world, as crappy and mismanaged as it is. Once Liberals come out of their fantasy world and start combining morality with reality, Reps are doomed. But, unfortunately, Liberals have been going in the complete opposite direction since the 90s.

When you research how much doomsday material is being stored in Greenland territory, this purchase makes absolute sense.

"--Does Trump know that Greenland has universal healthcare and one of the largest public sectors (as a % of GDP) in the world?"

Exactly why he's buying it. We can buy one country at a time and fix these stupid Liberal mistakes to make the world a better place.

As the almighty Carlin once said, the only reason Earth allowed us to be made was because it couldn't create plastic on its own. Once Earth gets its fill of plastic, we will all die off. It's the perfect balancing act from nature...create something that nature can't create on its own, but make it so that the ones who can create it will die off from the creation.

Blah blah blah...China wants to be left alone to continue exploiting their own people and to make sure they can still manipulate trade to keep them the lowest cost provider of goods. Until they address that and start making strides towards conforming to the rest of the developed world, there is no reason to listen to them.

"Hillary thought Americans should be struggling together.

Trump thought we should be fighting each other."

Good exaggerated generalizations that are more accurate than almost anything someone filled with partisan hate would ever agree with.

It all comes back to the same problem that snowflakes just can't seem to understand. The reason why someone causes violence towards someone else is not the problem. The problem is the person who causes the violence. Don't agree with me? Then you agree that mentally handicapped people who commit violent crimes should automatically be freed without any hesitation or oversight. The reason they caused the crime is because they are mentally handicapped. So why don't we have half the country fighting against mentally handicapped people and wanting them to be controlled like they want guns controlled? Sorry, you can't be the parent of a mentally handicapped person unless you fill out all the proper forms and wait the 7 day period. Sorry, your mentally handicapped child cannot enter this building, it's against laws. Etc. etc. That's just one example of why fighting the wrong battle is not only absurd, but ridiculously illogical.

Sooooooo...just wondering. How do Liberals feel that their Mecca of all that is holy to them, aka socialized European nations, is busy lumping everyone into one group of people..."European"? I mean, Liberals do everything they can to make sure everyone in America knows that we are all different based on our skin color, nationality, etc....and here we have an ultra-Liberal publication trying to make sure we know that all Europeans are the same and don't deserve to be known by their own nationality?

Since people, deep down, know that being a snowflake is all just for show so Liberals can claim a morale high ground as if they care (just so people think they are good because for some reason Liberals MUST be liked by others or they go insane), it's something they can watch and claim it is offensive in any way they feel, thus making more snowflakes like them as a person, thus giving them the feeling they are good people. For Cons, they don't take everything so literally and offensively so they just laugh because it's fantastic comedy. Pretty easy answer, actually.

"I think our government is vastly over-bloated. However, when it comes to food safety, I'll accept some bloat.

Don't mess around with this..."

Definitely agree. Some bloat is OK. However, I think it's safer to have the company hire the individuals. Who do you think is more likely to care about the quality of the meat...a company owned by rich people who want to get richer or some audit guy who works for the government and doesn't give two cents about the company's financial status?

"Is a lack of awareness a requirement to be a member of the right these days?

Or is it just a coincidence that being a staunch righty leaves one unaware?"

All of the BS that Libs are forcing on America today makes EVERYONE suffer from lack of awareness. All of the BS that Cons are forcing on American today makes EVERYONE stop caring. So, there you go...those who are OK with Lib opinions are suffering from their own fantasy world and those who agree with Cons have a lack of empathy. Maybe this lets you have a revelation today to understand the true problem...instead of being so unaware as you prove by your comment.

Hahahahaha!!! Liberals shout every day how Christianity rules America and how we aren't truly a religion-free controlled...then the government does something about it and Liberals whine and cry. Liberalism's biggest pain point is this problem. You can't satisfy Liberalism because when you make one thing right, they immediately start whining and crying about what it makes wrong. This is why Liberals today have a problem keeping control, they believe they don't need control. They believe every fix works but then come face to face with the negative repercussions of those fixes and then think the next problem is something we have to face. There was a time when Liberals governed by the understanding that every action can cause negative repercussions and there is no way around that. Ever since the 90s, that philosophy changed where they want action and refuse to believe any action they take can possibly have negatives, but anything anyone else does only has negatives. I'd love for them to get a grip again, but all I can do is keep hope alive.

Thank you. This article could not have come at a better time.

Dems, if you have any question as to why Reps are winning seats. If you can't understand why anyone opposes the moral center you try to live by. If you have difficulty accepting someone else as your POTUS. This article is a shining beacon of example and explanation. Not because the author got anything right, it's because the author hits every checkbox on the "Why I can't vote Democrat" list. Smug? Check. Baseless accusations? Check. Thinking everything that is wrong is because of everyone but you? Check. Understanding politics but not leaving your fantasy world? Check. Not researching history that E.A.S.I.L.Y. exposes your smugness? Check.

It just doesn't end. Dems aren't in power BECAUSE articles like this are penned and released beyond any sane reasoning, not because the content of the articles are thought-provoking or accurate. This isn't even an attack. This is a call to action. Read this article. Digest it objectively. This article is a full template of how to get your people back. This article gives you everything you need to regain sanity in this country, if you could just stop being so smug and see things objectively, and understand that you do have faults but that's OK. Leadership is largely understanding your own faults, accepting them, and making the right decisions in spite of them. Leaders who think they do no wrong are not effective leaders...as is evidenced every day by our current POTUS. You know he is wrong. You know he's not effective for governing by your ideologies. So why, then, do you treat your opposition the same way?

It's about damn time they start getting serious about this legislation.

"Pretending it won't affect brown people more than white ones is the work of morons. And pretending those changing the rules aren't aware of who it affects most is the work of turd polishers."

Oh boy, the racism just doesn't stop coming from the Left. Those coming over are mostly non-white. Are you seriously that bad at logic to where you use racism to make your point? That's like saying sending billions in aid to African nations mostly impacts brown people. DUUUUUUUUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH. But, I guess we should stop sending aid to Africa because it mostly affects brown people, right? I mean, we can't be treating them any differently than we treat whites, which is the entire premise of your statement. Or are we allowed to impact mostly brown people only when it agrees with your opinion? Your racism is truly appalling.

""We've made it clear that the committee is holding an investigation ... we are considering what to do about it, including the possible voting of articles of impeachment.""

No, as is clearly evident, you are trying to find ways you can impeach someone without being found guilty of any reasons for impeachment and get away with it. Basically, you are trying to find ways around the law so you can be as corrupt as politicians have always been. Both sides want to try to treat the Federal government like a private company, where they can do whatever they want for any reason. Our laws prevent that to stop any person or group from oppressing Americans but both sides have their heads so far up their own arses that they can't possibly see what the American people truly want, or what is best for America.

Yep, everyone should cater to her. When she passes, should we all get on our knees and bow? Just want to make sure we do everything she wants so we don't get an article written about me not respecting the millionth "unique" thing I have to cater to in my life.

If anyone hasn't watched it, watch the last season of Orange is the New Black. They address this stuff in such a positive and logical way. The 21st century definition of racism has already become dated and irrelevant...it's just a shame it took so long for snowflakes to get over it.

""We don't look to pick a fight every time this administration decides to take an action. But we challenge these actions by this administration because it is necessary.""

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA
AHHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
AHAHAHAH

That's EXACTLY what both sides do. Calling it out and saying you aren't doing it but having actions that directly contradict what you say just proves your guilt.

"Of the nearly 1,200 victims listed, roughly a third of them died between the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, in December 2012 and the massacre in Dayton, Ohio, last Sunday."

So, once one gets passed all the ignorant political hate that does nothing to help find a solution, then logic is all you have left. In this case, if the number has skyrocketed since 2012, then what changed? People still have the same guns they had before 2012. We've gone through 2 Presidents since then. What could have changed around 66-2011 that would pre-empt a large increase in mass shootings? There are a lot of answers but, unfortunately, America is so filled with hate that people have not only divided themselves up into 2 ideologies but they have also lost all willingness to compromise and accept their own faults. The reason this has almost destroyed America's foundation is that it prevents research being done that would help find out where the problem is. For example, one could say that the snowflake mentality is causing the problem. Since we baby our kids, they don't learn to accept hate or failure with dignity. But if you bring that up on the main stage, half the country will demonize you and, instead of doing research, the country will just argue about it and hate each other over it. One could say that the ability to get guns of all kinds has increased dramatically so not only finding one but getting one when you are angry about a situation is too easy. So we would need research. But if you bring that up on the main stage, half the country will demonize you and, instead of doing research, the country will just argue about it and hate each other over it. There are so many good possibilities that will never, ever become serious research because of the hate.

Neither side is willing to accept that maybe their ideology causes a problem so neither side can ever truly be part of the solution.

"Do other countries not have nutzoids? How come american nutzoids are so much more effective and frequent with their mass murders?"

And here's the whole gaffe of the gun argument. If you do the research, you will find that the US, on average, has a rate of 5 gun murders per 100k people. This number is incredibly low compared to many countries and on par with many other countries...even countries where guns are illegal. Unfortunately, Dems are xenophobic and always counter with "But that includes all nations and not developed nations". In other words, people in non-developed nations are not important and their murders are acceptable to Dems. But, for everyone else who isn't xenophobic, America's gun deaths are very low and middle-of-the-pack with the rest of the world. Sure, there are those who are better than us just like there are countries better than everyone else at other things.

So, to answer your question, American nutzoids are no more or less effective than nutzoids in any other country and they are not more frequent, and the facts support that assumption. In fact, the only people who believe your statement are privileged Americans who think our lives are worse than those in every other country in the world, which is ridiculously absurd. Just because you read headlines and don't actually do research is no excuse for trying to spread hate and misinformation.

"The convictions included assault with a dangerous weapon, domestic violence, theft of personal property, and breaking and entering, according to ICE. A POLITICO search of court records showed Aldaoud served 17 months for a home invasion in 2013."

So, using Liberal logic that has become rampant in Trump's term, one can easily and logically (again, only using the logic many Liberals on DR have been using so you can't deny this) infer that Liberals WANT criminals in America. If you can't be far-sighted enough to use real logic and insist on only using the words of someone and not the intent, then you HAVE to agree when others do the same exact thing. Otherwise, you are admitting you are being hypocritical and just want to spread hate.

Stupid headline that is the typical partisan crap. Basically, in America, you cannot attempt to stop frivolous lawsuits because every time ANYONE tries, it becomes a hotbed of discrimination rhetoric. Both sides have very valid arguments but neither side EVER looks at the negatives of their opinion. Trump wants to stop frivolous lawsuits but that can cause true discrimination to occur. Dems want to stop discrimination but that can cause frivolous lawsuits that waste taxpayer money.

If I were a person full of partisan hate on either side, I could infer that Trump wants discrimination and Dems want taxpayer money to go to frivolous lawsuits and not to more important public funds like infrastructure, healthcare, etc.

And the middle ground just continues to go ignored. I mean, who cares about finding a solution that involves the least amount of discrimination and frivolity...let's just hate each other!!! It's the American way!

""His commander in chief is telling people that if they kneel, they should be fired, or if they burn a flag, they should be punished," Jasper said. "He certainly didn't understand it was a crime.""

All arguments are invalid if the true problem isn't addressed. Having ANYONE on the streets who doesn't understand that picking a child up and slamming him on the ground is a crime should be in a ward. And that's not hate, that's concern for the guy who doesn't understand. He is a danger to himself and others.

All other partisan hate rhetoric is just letting the true problem go ignored. Obama said "You didn't build that" and the Dems were light-speed quick to defend his statement and basically said anyone who thinks he was being literal is stupid. Well, welcome to the other side. If you are a person who can't understand Obama's intent or Trump's intent and cause physical harm doing so...the problem isn't the President. Any of you with hearts so full of hate that you blame the President should move out of the country. Seriously, leave. This isn't a "hate my country" thing, this is a "someone has a problem grasping reality and your only solution is to blame someone else" so you are a serious danger to ANY society. Move and be a danger to another country, not ours.

"Be proud right wingers. Your hatred built that. In time, your hatred will destroy everything that was once best about America. (Now come on and give me some 'funny flags' you cowards.)"

Ok, this is inexcusable and truly hurts this country's morality and morale. In the same weekend, an ultra-Liberal Ohio man does a mass shooting. Yet, you refuse to accept that it's a population problem, not a political ideology party. You are doing your part to ruin this country worse than you feel the Reps are, which is the status quo for Liberals these days. Yep, the Reps are bad and causing problems...and Liberals are making them even worse but refuse to be introspective.

For hate-filled Liberals trying to use this as political ammunition...

This is inevitable and anyone using it as any kind of political ammunition has a problem with actually thinking first before talking. Eventually we are either going to have to go with one world currency or every currency is going to end up being used in all transactions because technology makes it so much easier.

"Or, you know, we could just go back to actually taxing billionaires and corporations instead of giving them a free ride. When you eliminate your tax revenue, you have nothing to pay the bills with. It's not that complicated."

They've already proven that taxing even the wealthiest citizens makes a very tiny dent in this country's spending, especially since they are already taxed so much higher than everyone else...any gain you get is only partial. But if you want to keep using Liberal talking points to get out of actually thinking about solutions, I guess that's just the America way these days.