The saddest part is that the majority of problems are all because people can't compromise. All people know how to do these days is be hypocrites who blame everyone else for the world's problems but ignore everything their own side does that is bad.

Oooooooooooooooh...not bad!! Not bad at all. It's been quite a while since this argument has been used by either party. The ol' "the party did it to themselves to make a point" shtick hasn't been used effectively since the Smollet situation and liberals defending him like he's a saint. I'm sure it's been used in circles since then but not on a national scale.

Very interesting; however, I'm sure Trump and his goons had this one in their pocket just waiting to throw out when something bunches up their panties. But it's still not nearly as bad as one party supporting and/or encouraging violent riots, violent crimes done by illegals, etc. Well, now that a Rep did it though I guess we can start a betting circle to figure out when a Dem will do it. It's only a matter of time.

A couple of my truly good life long friends use right wing media and they have a lot of right wing friends and are in the social media echo chamber. They spout lies and they don't want to listen until you hit them with a hard fact and that only temporarily puts them off keel. It's brainwashing."

A couple of my truly good friends use left wing media and they have a lot of left wing friends and are in the social media echo chamber. They spout lies and they don't want to listen until you hit them with a hard fact and that only temporarily puts them off keel. It's brainwashing.

See, the same can be done for the other side. The fact liberals refuse to accept any responsibility for anything bad, refuse to accept that not everyone with their ideology is a perfect saint, refuse to accept the reality of situations instead of what their media tells them to think is absolutely destroying this country just as much as Reps are. The fact that it is so easy to see this if you are objective is why the word "idiocracy" is so easy to use against both parties today.

But continue thinking your party and followers are perfect and can do no wrong. It ensures idiots like Trump are electable.

The reality still remains that more people have been murdered, raped, and/or had violent crimes committed against them than ICE has wrongfully treated people. A LOT more. Yet, when illegals commit those crimes, Dems support them. And that's not conjecture or assumption, that is IN WRITING, ON VIDEO, etc. It cannot be argued or denied.

Once libs start caring about Americans as much as they do illegals, a lot of this will go away because they will finally stop using ideology for political points and using their ideology to actually help America. Once libs become the bigger person, cons will have no chance of leading this country. But, as usual, libs instead care more about ideology than they do about what is best for Americans.

It's good she is posing to her people. That is very necessary to ensure they do not think she is falling in lockstep with the US as a new puppet. However, behind the scenes, things are progressing like they should. This is a nonstory and is just a move by her to show power to her people, which is an awesome thing to do in this situation.

He died because he was terminally ill and had all kinds of complications in the months leading up to his death. Partisan people will exaggerate ANYTHING if it helps their narrative. You can still feel emotions for the guy and not exaggerate to make political points. In fact, all that does is make YOU the bad person in this situation.

He's no more eager to escalate than all of the people coming out to "peacefully" protest.

Liberals can't see the forest for the trees. But, all both sides see is their ideology and are incapable of seeing anything else. The truth is this, regardless of how much you want to try to infect the situation with your own ideological bs.

Cons see illegals causing problems. A small portion of them are raping, murdering, abusing their time in the US, etc. Cons do not support this, liberals do. So then cons exaggerate the problem so they can send ICE. So then ICE comes in, makes people mad because they don't agree they should be there, so they start protesting. As is typical with protests, a small portion of protestors become problems and start getting violent or otherwise not peaceful with ICE, causing ICE to have to respond with violence. Liberals do not support this, cons do. This is the stupid cycle we are stuck in. All because a small portion on both sides think their ideology is better than anyone else's and feel they should take action in a way that is NOT becoming of our Constitution or any civilized society.

Just like with the LA riots and liberals claiming there aren't any riots and Trump is exaggerating, the actual problems in MN are nowhere near the levels of exaggeration libs are claiming. In the end, all that is happening is that libs accept the tiny fraction of crimes that illegals do and cons accept the tiny fraction of crimes ICE is doing. So both ideologies are fighting the exact same thing, the only difference is who is carrying out the crimes. Either Americans become victims of illegals or they become victims of ICE.

Again, you can ignore that all you want but that's the reality we are in. Like I've been saying for years, NEITHER side is fighting to fix problems. All they are doing is fighting to ensure their acceptance of the negatives of their ideology can exist without the other side's nonacceptance of the negatives. Both sides just completely ignore the negatives. Where is the lib outrage when an illegal murders, rapes, etc. an American (it IS happening and denying it at this point is just ignoring reality)? And, where is the con outrage when an American authority murders, beats, etc. a person who did nothing to warrant it (it is happening and denying it at this point is just ignoring reality)?

I'm so sick of both sides and their hypocrisy and fabricated, ideological outrage. There is one solution to this problem that fixes both issues, and that is to continue to try to stop illegal immigration as much as possible. If there were no illegals, ICE wouldn't be in MN. If ICE weren't there, protestors wouldn't be getting impacted like this.

The other part of this broken record is how libs absolutely, beyond any evidence thrown at them REFUSE vehemently like their lives depended on it that the protestors are all perfect little angels who do no wrong. And, since libs like history so much about how America is systemically racist, then they also have to accept the reality that shows when people group up in masses to fight against something, "peaceful" is hardly the word that can be used. After 250 years of history, protests en masse are anything but peaceful in America.

It's what liberals do best. They got BLM to destroy businesses, many of them being black-owned businesses. They want to hurt MN's economy simply because they don't agree with what the Federal government is doing, even though a very large portion of the country does agree with them.

This is all they know. They legislate solely on emotions and can't legislate on reality and common sense, so they do things that don't make sense. If they would only swallow their own pills, like in LA when the right-wing media was saying how bad it was but liberals saying that the problem is very small and nowhere near as blown up as the media was making it out to be. Same thing in MN. The impact to actual Americans is so tiny but liberal media blows it up like it's the rapture and we are all going to disappear. Both sides always say this, that the other side is exaggerating. Yet, their side never does. Their side is always right. Their side never does anything wrong. Their side is perfect. Blah blah blah.

Yeah, and Biden promised to get rid of covid in his first year because liberals "can do a better job than Trump". They didn't.

If you aren't old enough yet to realize that campaign promises are superficial designed to keep you in lockstep with the party that has groomed you, then you shouldn't be posting anywhere online.

Liberals lost any clout they had in this fight when their hypocrisy causes them to refuse to support and empathize with those killed by illegals. Once liberals get a heart and stop thinking that pandering along ideological lines for votes, THEN they can enter the conversation. As it stands today, their protests are nothing more than succumbing to a sheep mentality by their party.

You can support illegals without holding illegal protests. You can ALSO support those killed, raped, etc. by illegals without claiming you are against illegals. Come to the table as adults and the country will back you 100%.

"Citing previous President's probably also illegal arresrts of foreign leaders to stop ethnic cleansing and/or mass murders doesn't make Trump's kidnapping of Maduro legal and when we boil it down legality is not the question; motive is. Preventing mass murder or ethnic cleansing are humanitarian moral necessities but invading to grab resources like oil is not just illegal it is also very immoral and cannot be defended except by noting economic benefits to American oil companies. That difference should be obvious except to the stupidest MAGAs who aren't capable of understanding the difference between a moral imperative and an economic opportunity."

This is why liberals are known as the group who can't see more than 2 feet in front of their faces.

What if the oil is being used by a dictator to fund mass murder and ethnic cleansing? Or being used to stay in power even when citizens voted you out so that he can spread more oppression? What about if the money is used to fund just one missile that ends up killing 100 people...is it moral to stop that or are you saying it's OK because it's moral? I guess to liberals the ends justify the means and only the means but we should ignore all of the means except the ones that agree with our opinion.

I'm not defending this situation at all but the short-sighted blinders are ridiculous. Go down the rabbit hole a little bit. Don't just stop at the dirt of the hole and say, "Hole bad!" Look at the dirt a little to see how dirty it really is. Go into the hole to uncover the moralities you so desperately want to base your opinions on. And be objective to them when you see them. I know that's asking a LOOOOOOOT from any partisan person but that doesn't mean it's not necessary.

I do find it very funny (also very sad) that how politicians feel are often so different than what the actual people feel.

But Dems can continue trying to make points based on how politicians feel all they want. That just allows for someone like Trump to get elected. Even in his first term when he was supposed to lose by a landslide...because liberals were too busy thinking that since most politicians felt one way then that means everyday citizens feel that way, too. Which is a very sad ideology because, when you take out any partisan impact at all, almost every single person accepts that governing by how politicians feel is a terrible way to govern.

I know that people on DR and liberals in general want the US to be controlled by China's trade, but these are still considered nonrenewable resources. China's supply isn't going to last forever and as the inventory gets lower, that means China will raise prices. So why do liberals want Americans to pay more for products instead of trying to get rid of dependence on Chinese imports?

And you can't say that you don't want this to happen. That's exactly what all of you have been fighting against during this Trump term. Please, just answer honestly and do not try to contextualize how you aren't fighting for China and not for the US. It's all out there in MANY liberal outlets, on TV interviews with liberal protestors, etc. It IS happening so don't just be more sheep and try to say otherwise. Just put down your honest answer as to why you want China to control all trade regarding raw materials. It's a simple question and I'm not fighting your opinion. I just want to know honestly why that is the liberal agenda. To me, it's just "The other side wants it one way so we have to inherently fight for the other way" that both parties do. But finding someone to actually admit that is impossible because, for some reason, party affiliation is more important than ethics and doing what's right.

I already said it when Obama was POTUS. EVERY President from here on out will be impeached. It's the extreme thing to do and both sides have gone to the extremes every single day.

It's a rural town so it was already forgotten about by the left since they want to eliminate all rural towns. And their gross profit has declined significantly since 2022 so this was already the trend, especially considering the scandals they have been involved in. Trying to blame Trump for the failures of Tyson management, while truly idiotic, is not surprising coming from the left. Trump does so many things wrong that this is EXACTLY why TDS was coined. No POTUS ever needs help illustrating his failures. It is only the people who live with the POTUS in their mind rent-free that have a syndrome where they can't stop being negative all the time and demonizing everyone who thinks differently from them.

In summary, it's better to do absolutely nothing than it is to try to fix a problem. But we didn't need a new article to describe how liberals have operated for a couple decades now. Lewis Black, a liberal so you can't get mad at me for quoting him, said "Republicans have nothing but bad ideas while Democrats have no ideas."

"How you like it now?"

It's not that bad, actually. Thanks for asking. It's pretty much just about the same as Biden's tenure. The only difference you have is completely disregarding any good that could have come from any Rep legislations while praising everything a liberal does as the gold standard for the entire universe.

Ok, so we can finally put one of the myriad of topics to rest that exists only because of partisan stupidity.

By reading this article and understanding the intent, and by reading liberal reactions, we can now say that boycotting a brand based on ideological beliefs if a very sound and acceptable way to show our support, or our disapproval. Right? We can all agree on that now, correct? The argument is over. Those who boycott are not hateful. They aren't trying to cause problems. They simply want their wallets to speak to their narrative because that's how a Capitalistic society works. End of story.

So, that means all the hate liberals spread about those boycotting Bud Light has to be taken back and liberals have to apologize.

I mean, it's either that or liberals finally just accept their hypocrisy and that they spread, "Everything we think is right but everything anyone else believes is wrong" narrative. Can't have it both ways. It's one or the other.

And before anyone says that Bud Light's boycotts was out of hate for those who do not subscribe to traditional gender roles, one could as easily (with empirical and proof-positive evidence) use context from illegals raping and killing women, and the liberals defending them, as hatred. Sure, that's only if you cherry pick context and get rid of context that doesn't agree with your narrative. But that is EXACTLY what liberals are doing in this case. Which means both liberals and cons are doing the same thing, only the topic is different.

I know this won't change anything. But the bigger fight America needs to have is to fight against that narrative as it has done waaaaaaaaaaaay more damage to this country than illegals, gender opposers, etc. And since it has done more damage, it's a fight more worthy than these stupid partisan fights that both parties come up with that never get fixed so we just pile on more and more hatred.

But we can pardon (and support) Hamas for killing 1200 civilians.

If liberals didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any standards. Would really be nice if one of the parties would come even close to practicing what they preach.