Go to Google, type in any Rep who ran for POTUS in the last 20 years, and see how often they have told Dems to shut up. And then look at the Dems' reactions.

Then go to Google and type in hypocrisy and read the definition.

It's all bad. Praising your side for doing it and admonishing the other only makes you look dumb.

Um, the author just described every country with a news channel.

"Idiot presidents who mock mask wearing and pretend there isn't a pandemic happening."

No one is pretending a pandemic isn't happening. Most people are trying to pay their bills during the pandemic. Closing the country isn't conducive to that end. Thus, the hard choice has to be made whether to shut things down or continue letting people work by any means. There is no right or wrong answer.

You can still vote for Harris as the lesser of two evils. You can still call out Trump. But what you can't do is say Harris is a good example of Democrat leadership and legislation.

Um, Hamburglar, a straw man argument exists when there is exaggeration. There is no exaggeration here. Harris factually paid a little less than 15% in taxes. Trump factually hasn't paid anything close. But the reality is that Harris still didn't pay anywhere close to what Dems factually have been fighting against for decades. No straw man here. Just hypocrisy. This is an argument that can't be spun. It's all out there now. Accepting it and demonizing Harris is the only acceptable response if Dems want to finally become a party of the people. I'm waiting for it but their hypocrisy is keeping them from achieving dominance. Instead, they continue to fall right into the Rep's trap of the blame game.

And exactly as I said, Harris family paid less than 15% in taxes. 3m compared to 400k paid. This is an amount that Dems have villified from millionaires for years. But now all of a sudden it's fine. I didn't look at Biden's but I assume it probably is about the same in taxes paid.

But of course Dems will ignore the last 20 years of demonizing millionaires for paying this little in taxes because now it fits their narrative. Not ONE Dem can celebrate these tax returns without also being a proof positive example that they don't actually care at all about rich people paying their fair share.

Just don't be surprised when this happens to Biden if he wins.

But the bigger question is, if Biden wins and they release his tax records (maybe he already has, not sure), and it shows he paid the low taxes as a millionaire that Dems have been whining about rich people. Will that make any difference? I know it won't and Libs will embrace Biden but the inherent hypocrisy is so palpable I think I just gagged on it.

If taxes are a problem, and it is human nature to fight against relieving oneself of valuable possessions (e.g. money in this case), then why doesn't either side actually make it a big issue? They SAY it's a big issue but then every election we get millionaires running and both sides do nothing but attack the other instead of attacking the problem. That's where you have been shaped by your party. That's where you actually have to make effort to change instead of just attacking the other side for their part in the wrong and ignoring your side's part in the wrong.

Omg, dong measuring when the end result in so many cases is death. And yet both sides will still point the finger and say the other side is heartless.

Awesome, Dems now have another way to split our population and make sure everyone cancels any area where covid may have been impactful. Hey, if the map gets good enough, you can even support more killing, looting, and rioting in those areas to protest!

I'm sure they are a threat. But I don't seem them killing innocent people during riots and looting. So, while they are a threat, how does this make any other national threat a lesser problem? Why do Dems support the murders, looting, and rioting going on by one group and then admonish another group for being the same kind of threat? I'll give you the answer...stupidity and sheep.

Omg Dems are ridiculously bad at math. 3.5 million black voters is not a conspiracy. That's a VERY acceptable percentage of the group that the Reps knew would have voted for Dems so OF COURSE they are labelled as deterrence. Do you think Dems are trying to help black Reps from voting? Oh, forgot, Libs live in their own reality. 3.5 million is a very low number. Just remember that in 2008 the Dems slashed the tires of a Rep gathering place so they couldn't take the buses to the voting booth. Happens every election. To claim otherwise is to prove your incompetence.

Trump could shoot Putin in the face with a rocket launcher and you guys would still be like, "Trump only did it because he loves him; it was a love rocket." The saddest is part is some of you probably vote. That's the true tragedy.

Fake new, right Dems? Nothing is ever wrong with anything you support. Regardless of any difficulties in mail, you have already endorsed it as a perfect system to allow voting. So you are not allowed to get mad when anything goes wrong.

Also, if anyone likes this article, go read publications from other countries and their economic problems. I know you like to make sure America fails but the reality is that the world is in this thing together. Hence...PANDEMIC. It's very telling that the only people in America who think we have a national emergency with covid are those who are trying to get in power. But don't let reality change your views.

Funny how Dems LOOOOOOOOOOOVE first world countries but seem to completely just ignore third-world countries. If you think third-world countries have a "America is terrible" attitude, you completely ignore all the millions who migrate here annually and live better than where they came from. But, I guess to Dems it's a voting year so they will do whatever they can to ensure America fails.

Oh for the love of turds. Why are Dems making it so easy? It's very easy to save links now. When the Dems have full power, just keep this link in mind because they won't have any problems with it like they haven't had in the past.

And the whole "minority" crap is so played out. Dems act like 90% of America voted for Hillary. It's QUITE clear that America is divided down the middle. If an election comes down to 55-45 or very close to it, there is no minority. There are two sides that are equally represented. I fully understand that when it happens to Dems, Reps will get just as butthurt as Dems are today. But for Dems to try to make it out to be like the country is mostly one side or the other because they didn't win is completely false and just stupid.

Well, Dems believe BLM is a human rights organization and don't care that they commit human rights atrocities like killing...so this article holds very little weight and, unfortunately, will be dismissed as such instead of taken in the context it should be taken.

"The Republic he founded loved slavery."

As did every other country in the world. I guess Dems are just trying to make it a Republican issue throughout all of history since they are the ones who fought to keep slavery. This revisionism is terrible.

It's already know that Lincoln is a huge racist if you use today's definition. It's very easy to research. But he believed that peoples' opinions should not be the sole basis for legislation. That's how we should be. Libs make that impossible because they want to get rid of the First Amendment as it is written today.

Hmm...wonder what happens when you mix black licorice with diet gummy bears. We should tell Trump it will get him re-elected so he does it and we can make it a public experiment...

"President Donald Trump, for his part, is stoking fear among voters by questioning the legitimacy of mail-in ballots"a claim that has been repeatedly proven as false"and refusing to commit to a peaceful transfer of power if he loses to Biden."

Exactly why politics is such a clown show. I've seen multiple issues about mail-in voting from both perspectives, and both sides completely ignore the warnings from the other side. I've been saying this for many years. We could do a lot better as a country if we didn't allow our politicians to determine legislation and standards by what is good but instead by what they intend to do about the bad. There are very legit issues with mail-in voting, and they are issues both sides agree with and disagree with. But neither side will ever agree with the other on bad things because I guess it hurts their ego. But it has been proven true that voter fraud does happen in mail-in voting. Dems have only responded with "It's not as much as Trump is saying". Ok, so then what do you intend to do about the percent that DOES occur? Are you going to ignore that because your platform would be hurt if you do agree that it is a problem and needs to be addressed? What if the percent increases significantly? Do you have a plan for addressing that or are you going to stick to the "Well it didn't hurt us so it's not a problem" rhetoric?

Also, I do love that people vote before debates and both sides have had a chance to provide all of the information they need to provide. Just another example of Americans being part of the problem. Too many people already know their vote because they belong to a party and don't mind being sheep.

The sad part isn't that Fox news is labelled as not news. The sad part is people on the other side think the news outlets they read are actual news. So both sides get stuck in only reading what they agree with and get no additional perspective.

" Yes, but: The Trump administration has repeatedly suggested that reopening America's economy could boost herd immunity.
Public health officials say a vaccine should remain the priority on the path toward normalcy."

These two items do not impact the other so there was no reason to bring this up. Both can be done at the same time. It's either that or we close down America. And if Biden has any chance of winning, it won't be by running a platform that shutting down the economy is a good thing. This is where all the rhetoric leading up to today has bit Libs in the buttocks.

Nothing in that article mentions that Trump won't peacefully leave. Nothing. Not one sentence or word. I'm all for calling out a problem when it is a problem but making up problems to try to get votes is despicable on all sides.

Again, why are Dems so dependent on fear mongering as to bring up completely hypothetical situations? Especially ones where their own party has already said they are not going to be peaceful about it. And it wasn't even common Libs...it was Liberal LEADERS who have said it. So why ignore your own party and just bash the other party? Are you OK with everyone knowing without any doubt whatsoever that you don't care if your own party does anything wrong?