Woooooooooooooooooooooooow...

So this is what liberals consider to be monumental. So easy to please, I guess that explains a lot. Something as simple as a POTUS's VP running for office in the next election is somehow a miracle of modern ingenuity by Dems. You still have to explain why many of those who made this seamless were also saying Biden was perfectly capable of running, even when the masses knew it wasn't true.

But, I guess I can see why liberals accept such weak and unskilled leaders, considering something as simple as a POTUS not running again and his VP running next is somehow a unique, explosive strategy.

Now, if one puts this under the perspective of Dems strategizing to get someone named the nominee but bypassing any votes by the people, THEN this becomes a very strategic move that requires a lot of foresight. But, Dems have so far said that is not the case so we just have to trust them.

But dang. I seriously feel bad for liberals and the country as a whole if a major political party celebrates something that has happened many times in our history like it's a feat of amazement.

Wow liberals get desperate when their hypocrisy and lies are exposed. It doesn't matter what Biden officially called it, he DID and ON RECORD say she is responsible for the border problem. How her responsibilities aligned with that mandate is irrelevant. They quote:

""One of the ways we learned is that if you deal with the problems in country, it benefits everyone. It benefits us, it benefits the people, and it grows the economies there," Biden said then."

and

"Biden tasked Harris with addressing the root causes influencing people's decisions to migrate to the United States."

and

""I've asked her ... to lead our efforts with Mexico and the Northern Triangle and the countries that help " are going to need help in stemming the movement of so many folks, stemming the migration to our southern border," Biden said in March 2021."

But very little of that actually happened, so Reps are 100% right in this situation. Harris failed the entire scope of border problems, so regardless of what Biden tasked her with, nothing within the realm of root causes of border security was realized. So she failed. Plain and simple.

What has she done in other countries to benefit everyone? Very, very little. You can research it. In other words, no matter how she went about fixing the border problem, she failed miserably and that can't be denied. Trying to say otherwise is only liberals being no better than Trump.

So, instead of being little sheep and concentrating on semantics and how to make the party not look bad, try using a little critical thinking and objectivity. It's not the end of the world. In fact, had Harris come out and said she wasn't able to get to the root causes but feels that becoming POTUS will give her the clout and resources needed to devote a stronger approach, her stock would have risen considerably in this regard.

While not all felons, this list shows a LOT of Dems also being convicted of crimes and Dems fully support them (and some still support them after the convictions).

"While American youth are becoming more progressive and inclusive,..."

But they aren't. They are becoming more inclusive of Dem talking points. But as soon as anyone says anything different, they are becoming more violent and extreme than ever. Liberals today have taken the mantle from Cons in terms of intolerance and inclusiveness. Reps want everyone to be treated the same, Dems want everyone to be treated differently based on their age, sex, ideologies, race, etc. And that isn't even debatable anymore if you do any kind of research in the media over the last 5 years.

So spare us your partisan blinder routine. Join reality and take your party back to the days when they actually cared about tolerance and not only about what gets them the most votes.

And that's why the country continues to decline. Too many people vote on demographics than who actually is a better fit for a job. DEI has already shown weaknesses but liberals continue to ignore them because, as usual, they are too focused on the strengths of DEI to ever accept that maybe there are some flaws since that would make the party look bad. Apropos, Dems continue to do what is best for the party and not what is best for the country.

How stupid of Kamala, at least her logic. Trump never agreed to ANYTHING with Harris so for her to be spreading misinformation like this just goes to show liberals aren't any better than Trump. Trump had all of his rhetoric directed at Biden. And considering Trump didn't back out of anything yet and said let's wait until everything is settled, that's smart leadership. I guess Dems have gone so long without having good leadership in their party they forgot what it's like to actually wait to know all of the details of something before making decisions, which is how any person in charge of any decision should be.

Not surprised one bit. His family didn't do anything. But the one person in the family who donated to a progressive cause decided to break the law and shoot a candidate.

Not surprised one bit.

An entire article devoted to the self-exaggeration of liberal ideologies. Liberals actually think that America's ultimate destruction will be that we don't embrace pronouns. Forget our enemies, forget our economy, forget everything...to a liberal, all that matters is wokeness.

The lack of wokeness won't destroy anything. It won't cause the planets to move out of their rotation. It won't cause Russia to invade us because we aren't woke. It won't cause our debt to skyrocket anymore if we aren't woke (in reality, it worsens our debt).

Woke topics have their place and are something a country should do, AFTER it takes care of all of its existential and intrinsic priorities that sustain the country. It's a privilege that a country can fight for when everything else is taken care of. But, today, it isn't. It's not even close. Not one country throughout all of history failed because of lack of calling people what they want. Sorry, it's just not that important at a high level.

Third example of a debilitating IT issue this year and they won't do anything about it. The root cause is because companies grow so big and service so many customers that when it fails, it causes half the country to be out of order. Change Healthcare, the automotive breach, and now this. Yet companies still won't segment properly when they reach a specific number of clients on one system because it's cheaper that way.

We won't see any action to the root cause. All we will hear is how they are making steps to, in this case, better their change control and put in more checks and balances before making a change. But, since nothing is perfect, it will happen again in the future and they will still ignore the actual problem.

"The young people of today are going to live in a heat stroke of a world, thanks to the greed of the fossil fuel capitalists greed and their ability to buy off American politicians.

People in the 1800s could say the same exact thing even without fossil fuels being a catalyst. While I'm not disagreeing with climate change, the fact that it happens naturally is part of the conversation. And the planet has been heating up for millennia. While climate change may make it faster, your statement is inevitable whether or not fossil fuels ever existed.

Wow, it's lovely to finally hear Dems championing spending military resources on protecting other nations (even though they don't seem to realize they are doing it). All it took was rephrasing the issue in a way that conflicts with their narrative and all of a sudden the tune changes.

"Without evidence, Trump repeated accusations that Taiwan had taken "almost 100%" of the US's semiconductor industry.

Taiwan produces more than 90% of the world's most advanced chips, mostly through the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd (TSMC),"

I'd love to see more context here. So, they try to ding Trump by saying no evidence and then in the very next line they say Taiwan has more than 90% of the production. If any country has 90% production, it's pretty safe to say every other countries production has been impacted by close to 100%. I don't see any exaggeration there. Unless by "advanced chips", they only mean one kind of semiconductor. But then that context is missing from Trump's statement too, so it doesn't apply. Once again, political bias being put into a liberal article just to spread disinformation.

"Second, there is indeed a celebration of violence and a whiff of fascism emanating from Trump and the MAGA crowd that surrounds him. After all, it is Trump himself"and figures close to him"who for years now have been stoking the flames of discord in fascist-lite mode."

This is why so many op-eds are so laughable. To me, Trump's rhetoric hasn't been anything close to stoking flames of discord...at least no more than any other time in memorable history. Dems are on record all the time stoking the flames and denying that means you have no merit to talk in this conversation. And all the above quote really says is that because you don't agree with Trump, then you are scared to be around those who do. Just like that article about the person who walked into a restaurant and everyone was standing while they had American flags and the National Anthem (I think) playing, and the person described it as the scariest time in her life. There is nothing scary about it unless YOU can't see beyond your own myopic ideologies and accept others for who they are and what they believe. You don't have to agree or like it but writing an op-ed all about an "aura" that comes from your own opinions is pure partisan fear-mongering and nothing else. There is no argument that can be made otherwise.

"If it was a democrat and trump was killed we'd have a civil war."

Again with the "if"s. Liberals demonize Reps for playing "if" arguments all the time yet, of course and right on queue, liberals then use "if"s in their arguments. It's one of the easiest examples of hypocrisy to see if you would just take off the partisan blinders your Dem sheepherders have put on you and see things objectively.

Well, ever since liberals changed the laws in many places so that if a woman cheats on her spouse, she still is entitled to 50% and more in assets if he tries to divorce her...welcome to the world of stupidity. Glad you finally made it. Many of us have been waiting.

Now that you understand legislative stupidity, why not try to stop Dems from continuing to do it?

I'll bet money with anyone that, even though this guy is a Dem and got found guilty, within at least 6 months there will be liberals trying to say Reps are the criminals and causing all the problems. Every time a Dem gets found guilty, liberals all of a sudden forget about it very quickly and then hypocritically demonize a Rep who gets found guilty of something, saying it's indicative of Republicans.

And the broken record just continues on and on and on and on...

"Meanwhile, the Dems don't constantly use violence as a concept or in their rhetoric and yet they are to blame for violence when it occurs."

Ok...apparently you don't know who votes Dem. Because Dems spend a lot of time and resources on getting votes from certain demographics that use violence every day and have a VERY large proportion of gun deaths. And support and encourage violent looting and rioting where people die.

Just because you choose to ignore the violence done on the Dem side doesn't mean it just isn't happening. That's the problem with liberals, you choose to ignore reality and substitute your own. And, once again I have to remind everyone, that is EXACTLY why someone like Trump is even remotely electable in our country.

"He has repeatedly preached an apocalyptic sermon casting his political rivals as bent on annihilating the United States. He has depicted Biden and his allies as an existential threat to America."

Dems are on record saying Trump should be shot. Dems are on record, as recently as the debate, as saying Trump is destroying the country. Dems are on record saying Trump wants to get rid of Democracy. Dems are on record supporting and encouraging violent riots and looting where some people were killed. And, it was a liberal who shot Trump.

The hypocrisy is astounding. Just like liberals want Trump to take the blame for 1/6 regardless of any context, it is predictable that Reps are going to want Biden to take the blame for this shooting without any context. If you don't like it, stop being hypocrites. Start being the bigger people. Stop calling for violent looting and rioting when you don't get your way. When your hypoocrisy can't be thrown back in your face, THEN pull out the soap boxes and high horses. Until then, just recognize you are no better than Reps. It's true and you can't fight reality and actual evidence.

Blah blah blah. They have legitimate complaints about why US shouldn't be sending aid. But, instead of diving in to those complaints and figuring out how we can keep America strengthened but still help others when we can, this article is so full of partisan bias that only serves to demonize people they don't agree with. But, Dems being the hypocrites they are, they can't even see it. I've been saying for a long time, both parties NEVER look at the flaws in their ideologies, only the positives. So, let's give all of our resources to Ukraine and not worry about how America stays safe and solvent...right? Instead, let's just continue bickering like children and ensuring America never progresses.

It's hilarious that the primary measures of quality have to do with liberal buzz words and not actual quality of life. And yet liberals will use this as some sort of professional evidence of quality. The study should have been titled "The best states that meet liberal ideologies". And there is nothing wrong with this kind of research, it's only wrong when you make it political and ONLY focus on those political points that meet your narrative.

Just more money added on to the price of a car so they become even harder for low-income people to get. This is liberal ideology and, while it's not a bad idea, the lack of ANY acceptance of negative impacts to the people are never discussed with liberals. Just like America, where the party that wants everything to be highly regulated for safety or environment concerns also is the party who says they are for the working people...yet the working people can't afford the regulations that liberals want.

Awwwwww...liberals get so mad when our justice system actually enforces laws on the books. Liberals have been so busy trying to ignore laws they don't like they can't even see when real laws are broken and why the judicial system has to govern by what's on the books. This is literal evidence that liberals don't care about laws, they want to govern on their emotions and feelings and demonize everyone who doesn't agree.

Just remember you are using "if"s now. Isn't so easy to avoid them, is it? Wait until the next time the other party uses "if"s and maybe be a little more open minded.

Well, so now we have two candidates who are unfit for office. So why support either one? For anyone who actually cares about someone being fit for office, they will have to vote for a 3rd party or not vote at all if they are true to their word.

"At least until MAGA manages to turn us into a theocratic oligarchy."

Or until Bideniles turn is into a socialist communist country. Either way, America suffers.

"Yes, but two supposedly trained professionals in that role should be able to shoot straight. One of them scored one non-lethal hit out of four shots and the other one didn't hit anything.

Not exactly SCOTUS protection level performance, in my opinion."

Movies have really ruined the reality of guns, and it's not surprising the people with the least amount of gun experience fall for it. Shooting a gun in intense circumstances can be difficult and hitting a live motioning target isn't easy even for professionals. You would know that if you would actually own a gun and go to a range and practice. It's not like the movies where the good guys who are professionals hit everything they are aiming at. But, liberals are too busy trying to outlaw something they know nothing about.