So wait, is it a holy war or all about oil? Sorry, I unsubscribed from the daily "Today's agenda based solely on our emotions when we woke up" memos the Dems send out.

"It's more how, as you say, Rep Talirico sees it; a faith in loving and treating others the way you would want to be treated."

So how can a liberal see it this way when the Dem party is busy hating anyone who doesn't agree with them? If the golden rule is actually a thing, that means Dems want to be assassinated considering that's how they are treating Reps.

And, as usual, the opposing party's response just ensures both sides will continue to treat every incident like this in a silo and pretend they have no responsibility. To liberals, when a Dem politician is attacked, it's due to Rep vitriol. To cons, when a Rep politician is attacked, it's due to Dem vitriol.

And what happens after every attack? The opposing party spouts vitriol. Then, when confronted, they claim it's warranted and can give plenty of ideological reasons why.

The broken record doesn't stop skipping.

"Since you're a gullible dullard, let me explain to you how rational people approach this administration.
Distrust.
Always.
Until proven otherwise, assume the worst and assume it's driven by ulterior motives."

Makes sense. Problem is, since your rhetoric is exposing you as a gullible dullard, you approach any administration that you agree with as not having any faults and everything they do is perfect and for the betterment of society.

Since both sides react like the person you responded to AND like you, based on partisanship...you are just as bad as the person you resorted to name calling. Again, proving your just as much a gullible dullard to your own party.

Rofl...again liberals have a hard time understanding economics.

1. Why is Trump evil for getting rid of a good amount of income tax requirements for middle- and low-income people? He got rid of taxes on tips and some other things that essentially lower income tax burdens. But liberals still demonize him for it.
2. Any tax on the rich is just like a tariff wherein the costs are passed on to the consumer, or worse. And this is the part liberals TRULY need to finally understand so we can actually move forward with real solutions. The wealthy have very little liquid money. Most of their money is tied up in investments of companies. Any big tax on them means they have to sell their investments in those companies. And when a lot of money is divested from a company, they are forced to raise prices, lay off workers, etc.
2b. This is why investments can't be taxed, on top of it being a net loss for people with investments. I'll try to explain it in a way a typical liberal can understand at a 5th grade level. If I make $100k a year but I have $500k in investments and you tax me on my networth, you tax me on $600k. If you charge me 10%, then I'd pay $10k for my $100k. Yet, if you tax me 10% on my networth at $600k...I now have to pay $60k which is 60% of my actual income that year. Then I have to sell my investments. Every year, I'd end up having to sell more of my investments until eventually I have very little. Nobody, not even middle class, can sustainably live off of that kind of system.

I'm not saying we shouldn't tax the wealthy more or make them contribute more. I'm just saying that so far liberals haven't found a way of doing that that doesn't cause layoffs, price increases, etc. In fact, the one solution that would cause everyone to pay more based on their status is a flat tax but liberals for some reason don't like that.

The sarcasm falls very flat but I guess liberals can't get out of the way of their own ineptness. Trump has been calling on EU to help with the Russia situation since the war began. Trump has been calling on the EU to help find identify better drug prices for everyone. Trump has been working with the EU on many things.

But, we all know that liberals have to make a point using sarcasm or parody because they can't make good arguments. What Trump hasn't done is blindly follow along with and/or bow down to the EU for everything. Liberals don't know any other way than to be followers so it isn't really their fault, it's just how their ideologies intersect reality.

Also, why do liberals shut up so quickly when the topic of EU comes up where they are doing things in a conservative way like immigration laws? Many EU countries have a lot of things they do that don't meet the liberal agenda but when that comes up...crickets. The hypocrisy is palpable. As I always say, liberals could run this country if they could just get out of their own way.

"I can't see California doing something this bigoted."

It is very sad that liberals now despise basic laws of communication for a society to function. I don't think there is one ill in our entire reality that liberals will not call bigoted when it suits their purpose.

Wait, you stubbed your toe? That's because America is bigoted. You ate a triple quarter pounder with extra cheese and bacon and you got fat. Oh damn, that's a result of American bigotry. You have a different opinion than me? That means you are bigoted.

Victimhood is all liberals know today. I can't wait until that party is full of adults again so I can root for them, having to support Cons against those children is very draining and really pisses me off the Dem party has come to this.

It was a forgettable show by a forgettable artist that delivered very little of its promises. I was excited that he kept saying this was a unifying event. That he was going to use the forum to show unity and to embrace our differences (his direct words). Instead, he delivered a show that only served to show the history of a land with about 1% of the population of America and to show off his gyrating dancing skills.

Overall, it wasn't any better or worse than any other average show. Problem is, it was all in Spanish which inherently doesn't serve to unify anyone since the large majority of the audience was not able to understand him. His words may have been the most prophetic, most resounding and capable words to unify this country but very few would even know.

When I saw them prepping and saw so many people dressed as plants, I thought it was going to be an amazing visual spectacle. Instead, I barely even noticed anything from that aspect of the show. Being objective, it wasn't a good show and it wasn't a bad show. The only people who thought it was a good show are those with a liberal agenda (who are still trying to justify it was a good show by making things up like "you didn't even have to know Spanish"...yes, yes you did and it's not even arguable) and the only people who thought it was a bad show are those with a conservative agenda (who hates anyone that even uses any hint of non''Murican English and judges without even at least watching first).

If you actually judge by vocal talent, dancing talent, and a unifying message he promised...it fell short. But, even without being able to understand the words, it was still better than some I've seen recently so I wasn't mad at it. I just hate that it wasn't in any way what he promised. Which means it was all for views and marketing. Very much like The Weeknd performance that he tried to lead up to all year by staging costumes and such (which was awesome and I really loved he had it planned for so long) but then fell incredibly flat in the actual performance.