Now is the time for Cons to be the bigger person. I'd really love to see them make an effort at unity. Do what the Dems want. Don't bash them. Work with them. If you don't get your way, just note it down. Then, when a Rep is in office, see what happens. Do they treat Reps the same? If so, great! If not, then you have the proof you need of which party is actually trying to practice unity and not just say it.

Obviously it won't happen but that's how we should be working. As it stands today, both parties are full of people who think unity means they get what they want.

More trash. I mean, Biden's speech was awesome and I'd love to see this theme play out. But...

"That line about "lies told for power and for profit" surely was directed not only at Trump, but at the media companies that have enabled Trump during his presidency."

There is no surprise at all that a Liberal outlet would do what Liberals do and make the sentiment that "Anything Liberals or Liberal outlets say = true and relevant; anything that Cons or Con outlets say = false and irrelevant."

And this coming from the party with a VP who wants to create a committee to monitor speech. If you can't see the problem in that, let me give you a short explanation...you are a person who wants a Dictator in office who can limit what people say and do.

Lincoln Project? So are they actually emulating Lincoln by admitting that racist talk is fine as long as your actions are right? Lincoln was a big racist and said many racist things on record. He should be emulated because actions are what matters, words are words and don't hurt anyone unless that person allows the words to hurt them. It wasn't until the 21st century that Liberals started wanting to control speech that diminished Lincoln's legacy. So you either accept that Lincoln's rhetoric is OK because his actions were what mattered or you accept that Dems think Lincoln is a racist POTUS who should be cancelled. You can't have it both ways.

"I've known this for years. Why should Wyoming get the same about of representation in the Senate as CA? Why should a presidential vote in WY be worth five times a presidential vote in CA in our anti-democratic EC? This is absolutely ludicrous. If we can't get rid of the EC, then we need DC and PR statehood and the John Lewis Voting Rights Act NOW!"

Careful now, you are sliding in to majority/minority talk here. One could easily say why should one race get equal representation if they aren't equal in numbers. Dems have slowly been indoctrinating America on how they can make sure one population of people aren't represented as equally as another based on demographics. The fact you can't understand that shows how blind you are to your own PCness, and why PC really means "Whatever Liberals want" and not "What is right for society".

Come on Dems, you won!! You don't have to use anonymous sources to spread your misinformation. I guess old habits are hard to break. It's the Reps' turn to use anonymous sources for spreading misinformation. Try to be better than them, PLEASE! It doesn't take a lot of effort, seriously.

The part I find funny though is the fact that Dems will tout vaccine disbursement as a win. Of course vaccine rollouts are going to increase under Biden...he has 4 years to make it happen. The drug companies are able to create more and more drug companies are coming out who release them. Availability is skyrocketing at a time when demand is high...so it's very natural everything is going to increase until we have it contained. And, concurrently, infections are going to go down. This isn't the act of a POTUS, this is an act of humans working together to address a serious problem. The world has seen it happen many times before and it follows the same pattern. Something sucks, then sucks more, then improvements are made, things start sucking less, humans get over it and it becomes a non-issue. Welcome to reality. The only thing Biden can do about any of this is to make things worse, which I have no belief he will. As long as he doesn't get in the way of this process, it is going to happen whether he is in office or Big Bird is in office.

We all know it really means "America united until a Republican is in office", then it's back to 2016-2020 for them.

"#15 A majority of Republicans think Biden stole the election."

Then a majority of black people rioted, looted, and killed during BLM movements. See how that works? Just like the Muslim terrorists and Dems after 9/11 saying we can't blame the whole for the actions of a few. The fact that Dems let the few dictate their perspective of the whole shows their weakness and hypocrisy.

I guess it's true that Dems are anti-Semitic. Non-Dems have done a lot less and have been called racist. So, enjoy your own dog food.

History will go down as Biden having a terrible audience for his inauguration. Trump did better. Facts about context don't matter, at least they haven't matter for Dems in a long time...so they can't dispute this. The fact is, no matter how you look at it, that Biden had lower numbers. You can fact check it all you want, it won't change. Sure, I have no doubt it would have been a lot higher than Trump but going by how Dems have fact checked many things in the last 4 years, context doesn't matter. He had lower numbers.

Dems, welcome to the hypocrisy you are going to start getting from the Reps. You started the moronic fact checking trend where most of the facts checked are done so without context. Well, now it's your turn. As a human being, I would love Reps to not do it but as an American, we can all deduce by now that isn't possible. The party not in power will do all of the things that the other party did when they were in power, and will most likely lower the bar. It's pretty much a fact unto itself in this day and age.

No she's not. She's poised to be just like every other VP. Liberals get so caught up in PC issues that they completely ignore the reality. It would be great if she pushed the boundaries of the VP office and did things to improve our nation that haven't been done before. But as far as how she is poised right now, she is no different than any other incoming VP. Every gender and race to date has not proven they are any better or worse than any other gender or race. Diversity has proven one thing...people are people. Politicians of any gender or race have proven they are corrupt and partisan. The general population is the same way. Stop making it out like a gender means anything. Gender only has one purpose in this context...to prove that anyone of any gender has the same opportunities as others. Beyond that, both genders have proven they act the same way as everyone else. Some are good, some are bad, etc.

This is the precedent set by Reps. They were the first to really start complaining about Obama's number of executive orders, and Reps whined like babies about them. Then Trump came along and beat him, and Dems whined like babies about them. And now Biden is already starting the race on day 1 to beat out Trump. It's only a matter of time before Reps start whining like babies again.

In the meantime, the actual premise of why executive orders can be bad just gets pushed further and further under the rug.

It's alright. A Dem is in office. All of our problems are over. Articles like this are irrelevant now.

In other words, Dems should hail him as the best activist of our time, the same they did to Snowden.

Haha. Are you all 4 years old? How can anyone possible not see this same exact headline and article every time a new POTUS is put in office? You can literally type in Google is the worst president ever" and get documents going back a long time to see people making the same claim. Obama was the worst. W was the worst. Clinton was the worst. Etc. I guess the only conclusion you can make if you read all of that is that every President that is put in office becomes the worst ever, lowering the bar with every new seat.

And still crickets when it comes to the Dem politicians who supported AND encouraged killings this year. Pick a freaking side. Stop ignoring your own party's faults because it would make them seem less than perfect.

When people complain about the lack of jobs because of economic situations (covid, offshoring, etc.) but then fight to ensure the supply of people available continues to rise, all it takes is a little bit of logical thought, not much, to understand how that is going to work out. Wanting people to be able to live in better situations is great, not having a plan to deal with the negative repercussions of that decision is a failure of our leaders and the people who vote for them, who refuse to believe there are any negatives because it would make their party look bad.

Funny, Trump placed multiple travel bans during his tenure and he was labelled as racist, xenophobic, etc. by Dems. Yet, here the Dems are. I believe this is another example of where I said watch what you wish for, soon it will be Dems who are wanting it. And here we are. It's funny, but at the same time incredibly sad, how predictable both parties are if you just follow the hate.

If provocation is enough for legal implication, the country is in serious trouble. The Dems said things just as bad, and in some cases worse, during the looting, rioting, and killing they did for much of the year. Both parties have done it going back as far as I know. If action is taken against one politician for doing so, the next decade is going to be a landslide of lawsuits every time a politician says anything that could be taken in the same context. Forget your partisan hate for just a minute and realize what you are actually wanting.

Again, Liberals just making up their own nightmares. I don't think anyone would disagree with the fact that America has a lot of deranged people who will do crazy things, it's not just the military. In fact, I would go so far as to say the percentage of military people who would do something like this is incredibly low compared to the rest of the American population. So the only reason this is news is because Liberals scare themselves and then believe their own conspiracies. Very much like the premise of Sound of Silence. You made the monster, don't get mad when that monster becomes a detriment to yourselves.

I'd like to know who allegedly described him as a white supremacist. If it was a Liberal, then it probably means he didn't bow down to everything Liberals want and that doesn't make him a white supremacist. Not to mention, the amount of "anonymous" sources used by Dems during Trump's Presidency would fill a European nation. There are white supremacists out there, no doubt. But the number is incredibly low. Libs have artificially inflated the number during Obama's terms to mean anyone who doesn't agree with everything Liberals say or do.

Are there DRers who live in the Villages? I just can't believe it is posted on here multiple times this year. I know they are a huge retirement community in a state that is historically for retirees but I didn't know it was so big that it garnered this kind of attention.

I'm still kind of mad that the Bucs made me have to root for Brady. I'm still going to wait about 10 years before accepting the Bucs are moving on the playoffs until there are no accusations Brady cheated while he was with the Bucs. At least it removes Beliboy from the mix as we KNOW he cheats every day of the week. But I think his shady ways rubbed off on Brady who started cheating because of it. Just hope that has left Brady now. Only time will tell.

Liberals: Trump took all the jobs!
Also Liberals: Get rid of things that provide jobs!

If the Reps weren't that way, you would have little to complain about. If Dems weren't anti-Constitutional freedom, Reps wouldn't have much to complain about. Both sides would be complaining about little things with no bearing on anything to try to spread their partisan hate. So, at least we have something common both sides.

Well, looks like cities have two choices these days. You either allow Reps and just not get paid or you allow Dems and deal with looting, rioting, and killing within a mile radius of the event. Pick your poison.