Same rhetoric, different party. Liberals mistook Obama for a Messiah and all we got were articles from Cons talking about how bad that is. Cons revere Trump and of course Liberals give the same treatment.

In reality, each party swears the POTUS is either worthy of adoration because he belongs to their party or is worthy of scorn because he doesn't belong to their party.

"Obama's fault, somehow.

Meanwhile, here in the real world, millions will vote against their self-interest and vote for Der Dotard, because
(A) He says things they think, but don't have the nerve to say when sober
(B) They are NOT going to vote for a woman, anyone connected to Obama, an old coot, or some other dark-skinned guy, not matter what
(C) They think their pay checks got bigger with the tax cut, when all they actually saw was and adjustment in withholdings
(D) America is great again, because Trump said so, and we all know a lie becomes the truth the more its repeated"

Well, let's fact check some:
A...Well, this is an assumption so can't fact check it, even though Liberals don't know the difference between a fact and an assumption.
B...Sure they will, when a woman holds the same values as a Con then they won't have any issues doing so...and factually speaking, there are a ton of women who are Cons and many of them HAVE been voted in to political offices, so your statement is an assumption again, not a fact.
C...Obama did the same thing and Liberals fell for it just like Cons did...no different than today. And my paychecks are bigger and I got more back at the end of the year. So, your statement is false because it DID change peoples' checks and taxes. My assumption here is it didn't change yours so you are being a typical selfish partisan hater and blasting it because it wasn't your party who did it and it didn't help you, and you couldn't care less about other people who it may have helped.
D...If it becomes truth the more it is repeated, then you are admitting America is great again...so that can be considered a fact. Or, just maybe, you are full of hate and use sarcasm as an outlet for that hate...

"Back from a trip to China, Le Maire said Beijing's trade war with the United States could cut half a percentage point from global growth next year. "

So, the guy SPECIFICALLY said "Beijing's trade war", he urges the US and EU to work together to ensure China doesn't profit from it which is proof positive of where the problem lies, and yet you Liberals on this page STILL try to spew your hate. It's a shame what 21st century Liberals have devolved their party down to.

"I becomes clearer by the day, Republicans are traitors to their own country."

Liberals do everything they can to open our borders to foreign influence and bring in people to get their votes and they are happy with that. But when foreign parties do anything that helps the Cons, all of a sudden it's a bad thing. What Russia did is absolutely no different than what Dems are doing by playing border voting games. The fact your hate blinds you to your own flaws doesn't mean those flaws are unnoticed by everyone else. It's sad that even a gay Liberal can come out and say not hate everyone who thinks differently than you and gets blasted for it just shows where the real hate comes from in politics.

"George Bush should be in jail for War Crimes -- and "liberals" and Democrats act like the WMD lies, the Iraq War, and torture, all never happened."

This just adds to the hate that Liberals can't get rid of. There were no lies, there was incorrect information. That is why so many people on both sides backed it. The data wasn't fabricated. Not to mention they DID find a portion of the WMDs that were in question except those WMDs passed their expiration date so the Liberal media quickly kept it low key as if it didn't matter. Btw, torture occurred under Obama too so I guess he should be a war criminal. d

This person wrote an entire article about something that has already been tried in court and lost every single time. Biden is a candidate for an elected position. The term "public" no longer applies to him. This is the law. He is fair game for any dirt anyone wants to bring up regardless of how they got it. The issue is that an elected official tried to use his influence with American funds...THAT is the issue. I mean, it's no surprise that the party not in power will do everything they can to make the party in power look bad but this is just silly and stupid considering the entire premise of the article already has been debunked by many lawsuits.

"Trump has little interest in the details of policy. He makes up his mind about a thing, and those who disagree with him"even those with manifestly more knowledge and experience"are stupid, or slow, or crazy."

Sounds exactly like what every POTUS does to the opposite party when they are in office. If that doesn't cause the same uproar, this faux rage over Trump doing it to someone is just stupid.

"And Donald Trump. In fact, these companies are taking the lead set by the POTUS."

And yet, this same censorship existed in America prior to Trump so you are just showing how biased and hateful you are. Trump didn't start it, he's just a master of it.

This is the world of Liberalism. This same censorship has already started happening here, the only difference is it's not the government involved, it's the Liberal populace. There have been many shows in the last decade that have been censored, taken off air, people fired, etc. because Liberals didn't agree with what they said. Argue it all you want but this is exactly what happens in America and you can't deny it. The only way Liberals will argue it is by starting their sentence with "Yeah, but..." and give some explanation as to how their censorship is different.

OK, but let's all make sure weed stays illegal...

Clinton creates a skeleton crew army that allowed 9/11 to happen and Liberals praise him to this day. Trump just wants to protect himself and Liberals go nuts. No guessing game is needed to know where their priorities lie...

It is somewhat amazing to think people actually fall for these kinds of studies. I would never say the results are not possible. But the problem is there are so many controls that influence the outcome that the research had no possibility of NOT concluding what it did. I would love to see a study that is done without any of the bias or influences like this one did and really see how it works.

The whole Liberal snowflakeism was the genius strategy that got us to this point. Liberals knew the easiest way to get an approved point of oppression is to make it a problem. What they lacked was a problem serious enough to get the support they needed. Decades ago, they were smart and started making sure our kids are not capable of social responsibility. Kids these days don't know what it's like to fail, ensuring that when they do a certain amount of them will handle it so badly that they will kill other people. Add in all the added types of snowflakeism and lack of personal responsibility that Liberals have integrated into society and anyone older than 10 can reasonably associate the snowflake issue we have today with the people who are incapable of responsibly handling their emotional affairs. Liberals wanted to oppress Americans and get rid of our guns to make us less safe and they strategized it flawlessly. I agree there is no way one can argue against tighter gun controls today, the problem is ego and Cons not wanting to admit they got out-smarted at a level they didn't think possible.

In a world where partisan hate is more important than doing the right thing, it would be great if we were investigating rich people doing rich things that further separate them from everyone else. Unfortunately, the only reason this has any attention is because Liberals found out about it and want to make the POTUS look as bad as possible. But when a Dem gets in office, they just turn a blind eye and ignore the whole thing...exactly what Reps are doing today when they did everything they could to expose Obama's corruption that the Liberals ignored but are now ignoring Trump's corruption.

Once we start looking at ALL corruption as a problem and not just the corruption of the individuals we have bias against, this type of article will get a lot more attention.

Uh huh, a Liberal does something wrong and people are "forced" to investigate them. A "Con" does something wrong and it's just common sense to investigate them.

The hypocrisy from the Left still continues to fly to new heights. Because a Con does something wrong, Liberals believe that Liberals can't do anything wrong or shouldn't be investigated.

"More liberal tears over yet another Trump win - which is also another win for America. Liberals love to cheer on China, North Korean, Iran, etc but hate to see the US win. Why is that? Why all the self-hatred? The only people that I have ever seen such a level of self-hatred from are the Swedes."

Not really a Trump win. This is one example of our government doing what it's supposed to do beyond partisan hate. Obama was fighting for this in both of his terms.

"Trump seems determined to put us into a recession and I think he is going to succeed."

Trump tries to get us on even ground with China and Liberals cry like babies. Then he does the same thing with the full backing of the WTO who ruled in favor of the US, and Liberals still cry like babies. Eventually, the people like you on both sides need to be removed from all ability to provide your opinions on anything before we can get this country back in the right direction. Basically what you are saying is it's great for other countries to take financial advantage of another country. I know that one issue with Liberals on this is that the WTO and USA are both in the right against the countries Liberals think are the Mecca of the world and when they are proven wrong, they do what all Liberal snowflakes do these days and find a safe space and cry.

In summary...do exactly what the politicians the decade before did, which they did what the politicians the decade before them did.

There's nothing new here. Liberals did it in the 90s, Cons are doing it now, and they are all following the same playbook as both parties (and a couple other now-defunct parties) did in the 1800s and 1900s.

"I am waiting for the right wing racist pieces of filth here in Florida to try and prevent the thousands of Puerto Ricans who came here after the hurricane wrecked their island from voting. My bet is they will wait til we are closer to the election, get a federal judge to rule that those people are not really citizens of the U.S. and it will be too close to the election to effectively appeal the decision. This is how the right strategizes things, they are cynical but they hire the smartest lawyers who know how to play the system."

It's not against the law, so Cons don't care. You are so hate-filled that you can't see past your own hate to see how stupid that sounds. Cons want people to follow the law in regards to anything immigration related. Liberals want people to break the law in regards to anything immigration related. If you actually spent the same amount of time trying to learn and be intelligent about politics as you do on creating hate-filled rhetoric just because someone has a different opinion than you, this site would be Dannirific. Until then, it's Dannidowner.

"It's been only a few months since the speed increase took effect, not long enough to make meaningful before-and-after comparisons. And there is no available data to compare injury rates at the factories with higher speeds to the industry average because the Trump administration scrapped a requirement for employers to submit their injury logs."

And yet an entire long-winded article was written trying to prove cause and effect. Educated Liberals should completely lambaste this author. This is what makes Cons have ample ammunition to prove how bad the Liberal party has gotten. The logic of this article is incredibly bad and any educated person will see it immediately, so don't let hate stop you from at least doing your best to get rid of the idiots in your party (btw, that goes for both parties Cons...)

Here's where Liberals

"American liberals won the first Civil War. And they'll win any potential second one as well."

Ummmm, anyone here want to tell Nerfherder the truth or just let him live in ignorance until he finds out the truth one day in the real world and embarrasses himself? This is a funny comment though. It's like hate-filled people just want to ignore anything they don't agree with...which matches the Left's call to get rid of history they don't like. In fact, now I'm seeing that the Left is actually trying to get rid of history that is bad so nobody can be reminded of who actually endorsed slavery. They got real tricky with that but now it all makes sense!

Liberals do have a common theme as they did with W. On one hand they banter about how stupid and idiotic the guy is, then on the other hand they talk like he's an evil mastermind who is intelligent enough to run an entire government on his own merit. This article is a perfect example of Liberals making someone powerful solely based on their own hate. If you would just stick to calling him names and disagreeing with him, you would at least show some consistency.

It's about time Liberals actually found a worthy form of investigation to prove corruption. I'm definitely interested to see what they find. Of course, my wish of being impartial and logical won't happen but at least it's progress for the Liberal party. Baby steps!

"Yet I have conservative friends who still argue we should have let it all meltdown."

Ahahahahahahahahahah...no you don't. This is absurd Liberal talk that people filled with hate just can't stop doing. Liberals DESTROYED the bailout talk and said Bush was completely wrong for doing it. The fallout against Bush was just as much as any article you see about Trump today. Bush was crucified for the entire bailout process. Obama made it a huge part of his campaigning to make Bush look bad by using the bailouts as an example of bad government. Not to mention, Liberals try to convince the country every day that Cons love money and own all the banks and do everything they can to keep banks powerful, so why would they want it to fail?

This is the biggest piece of garbage I've ever heard coming from a Liberal, and that's saying a lot. This kind of talk ruins a system that is already in ruins. Most likely what happened is you are new to politics because you are young and you saw a picture of Pelosi and assumed it was Liberal legislation, so you made a comment to bad mouth the side you don't like instead of actually researching and learning the truth about what actually happened. This is pathetic and established Liberals who are adults should condemn this type of rhetoric immediately.

"Trying to defend Trump, GOP leader caught off guard by reality"

It's definitely a wake up call for any GOP leader to have to go through what Liberals go through on a daily basis. Getting hit by reality hurts anyone.

Wow. Pelosi has been hated by her own party. She's on record as making stupid decisions just like Trump. She's a partisan hater who does nothing but what she wants and expects everyone to follow, and if they don't she finds ways to excommunicate them from the party.

And Liberals just don't care at all. The fate of the country doesn't matter to them, all that matters it their party is in power because I guess it makes them all warm and fuzzy knowing someone with similar opinions is in control. Even when those opinions have a history of turning into exactly what Trump is doing, it doesn't matter.

Actually, it wouldn't hurt America much. In fact, this would actually help us because it would cause China to suffer so much that they would have no choice but to succumb to Trump's demands. Hate to say it but war would be incredibly beneficial to America. So much so that now I'm actually scared it's going to happen. All America would have to do is stand back and hope Russia and China don't get involved. Russia probably would but China definitely wouldn't.

"S. A. (i.e. MBS) has miscalculated. They thought that they had Trump in their pocket; and for a limited time they did. But now that Trump is likely to be impeached, they (and other world leaders) have to rethink their position vis-a-vis the U.S. S.A. best move would be to get Trump to do something quickly before the HOR gets any further along into the impeachment process."

Wow...that is a whole new level of assumptive conspiracy thinking in a fantasy world. I'm actually impressed by the level of absurdity and that is quite rare these days considering the doozies Liberals have come up with over the last couple of decades. Kudos to you.