Well, while it tracks with Rep logic, it also gets rid of the gerrymandering Dems have done ever since the Act was passed by ensuring they can redraw lines that gets them more votes. All Reps are doing is trying to get rid of lines that would get them more votes. Both parties are doing the exact same thing, only Dems try to put a moral high ground in the situation by wanting to force discrimination but as a safety net. Neither side is right or wrong, they just want votes. To try to demonize it as if Reps are doing anything different than Dems is laughable. Everything is on paper for any of you to research. Dems gerrymandered so hard in the 90s that Reps are still trying to catch up today, and the facts prove it beyond any argument. Yes, Reps are fighting back by being stupid mainly because they don't have any other idea of how to counter the Dem's strategy but that still doesn't make Dems right for doing it in the first place.

In fact, the 90s gerrymandering Dems did was right before I left the Dem party and I still consider it the last great strategy Dems ever had. I personally think they outsmarted Reps so bad that Reps had no choice but to actually get less dumb or face extinction, given that Clinton was so effective as a leader. So Reps did that and Dems haven't been able to keep up, instead they have resorted to using woke politics and hypocrisy as their platform.

This is how all religion has been since the beginning of religion. Hell, the Dark Ages was nothing but religious people doing whatever they wanted.

That being said, I remember after 9/11 the people with left ideologies were absolutely gung-ho about "Don't judge an entire demographic based on what a small minority of extremists from that demographic do". And that is still good advice today, even though liberals don't subscribe to their own ideologies when their poligion gets in the way.

I mean, I know liberals today own hypocrisy like it's their skin but now you are going a step farther and bringing in hypocrisy from 20 years ago.

And, of course, the inevitable reply from you DR lib kids is "but it's most Christians." Well, as of 2023 according to a quick Google search, over 200m Americans identify as Christian. And, if over 200m Christians were guilty of what you are claiming, this country would look a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOT different right now, so that is not a valid statement.

"Those miners can thank Der Dotard for putting them out of work..."

And they can blame liberals for dying of black lung disease. Instead of shifting some money to create cleaner coal, they completely ignore coal worker work environments and spend all that money on other sources of energy. Reps can't shift money towards cleaner coal because liberals are too busy using that money elsewhere. Which is really sad, especially considering your only solution is to take their jobs away from them. Well, I guess that is actually one way to stop coal miners from getting BLD...just take their jobs. Great solution, libs!!!

Also, black lung disease hasn't seen higher upticks at all yet, and it's been a known risk for decades. But after decades of problems, this one minute of a few coal miners complaining that enough isn't being done is all of a sudden a national emergency caused by Reps.

Can't make this amount of absurdity up even if you tried.

He's not wrong. Crypto was a fantastic idea when it started. It was all about decentralization and deregulation, and it worked for a time. But, as usual, the wealthy took control of it and now it's no different than any stock or ETF. 10/10 proved this beyond any doubt now. There was no reason for BTC to dip. In fact, its entire existence is due to the want of creating a currency that operated outside of markets and economies. But, sure enough, enough wealth got their hands involved and tied the asset to their companies, making their stocks react proportionally to the economy. People like Saylor and others destroyed any hope for crypt being the answer to fiat.

I love how Biden's weaponizing of government departments was OK but when Reps do it all of a sudden it's a bad thing.

Partisanship has truly created Idiocracy in America.

That's nothing. Dems refuse to spend money helping the homeless because they want to spend money on illegal immigrants. They want homeless people to stay homeless while they divert that money to facilities and workers to manage the open borders they so desperately want.

Sucks when politicians do this. It sucks even more when a party does it but then whines and cries like babies when the other party does it, too.

Here are some numbers someone just posted elsewhere. I'm not validating them but, from what I know regarding county lines, this is at least 80ish% accurate if not 100%. Please don't argue over the facts and resort to name calling or demonizing just because you don't like the facts. Argue over how we can make it right for the country and not do just what is best for the party. Both sides need to make changes but that won't happen if both sides are also doing everything they can to ignore why the changes are needed.

California:
Democrat votes: 60% 42 seats 83%
Republican votes: 40% 9 seats 17%

Texas
Republican votes: 58% 25 seats 65%
Democrat votes: 40% 13 seats 35%

For Texas to reach California's already gerrymandered level of proportional seats to votes,

Texas would have to have:
Republican Seats: 32
Democrat Seats: 6

Is this a surprise? This is what Dems do and have been doing for a very long time. They gerrymandered like crazy in the 90s. Reps are still fighting to get things balanced again. So then Dems gerrymander even harder acting like it's a national emergency.

Again, this is just typical Dem behavior. Ego and emotions rule liberal minds. And while that provides many positives for the party, it also causes many damaging trends. And this is one of them. Try reading other outlets that don't stroke your ego and ideologies, try other outlets so that you hear balanced news.

And, as usual, both sides point the fingers at the other saying it is their fault.

Groundhog Day and a broken record got married, American politics is their baby.

"Most corrupt nation on the planet."

Until you realize how corrupt universal healthcare systems are, then you finally become an adult and realize every system is abused by those in power. It's sad how many people think socialism is any better than capitalism when we have plenty of real-world evidence that proves otherwise. The problem isn't the systems; the problem is people like you who ignore all of the negatives because they don't jive with your ideology. And I'm not being biased, the people on the opposite side of you also choose to ignore the negatives. That's just how grooming and indoctrination by your poligious leaders have made you.

PEs are the worst thing to ever happen to business. But, make no mistake, PEs are the same thing as government in socialist countries. All that changes is in capitalism the PEs are private leaders but in socialism they are public leaders.

Once you DR lib kids grow up and actually know how the world works instead of just knowing, "America bad, everyone else good", you are going to be so much more prepared to make good decisions.

It's as stupid to be against this photo being removed at a park as it is for liberals to be against allowing any progress America has made in civil rights from being discussed/illustrated. Liberals HAAAAAAAAAAAATE when America looks good by growing from our mistakes and actually go out of their way to try to get people to believe that black people are no any better today than they were in 1850, or 1960s.

So, spare us your faux outrage. The only reason you have any opinion on this is because your political religion blinds you just like every other type of religion in the world does to their respective followers.

"For today, I want to focus on the ways MAGA " including the late Charlie Kirk " have been exploiting men's problems for political gain. While these problems are real, MAGA's explanations are fake. And because MAGA's explanations are fake, it can offer no real solutions. It only offers an ever-escalating story of victimization and outrage."

Rofl. The author just described liberals 100% when it comes to illegal immigration, trans laws, etc. Dems use every ideological pain point in our country for political gain and offer no real solutions, just victimizing and outrage.

Now, whether or not you agree with that (because you are a con) or disagree (because you are a lib) doesn't matter. What you should really be gaining from this is that both sides have ideologies/opinions the others don't but both sides are valid in their concerns. The ONLY thing causing any problems is that both sides are so indoctrinated by their political religion that they can't see any other possibilities.

Censoring speech is the LAST thing ANY Dem/liberals is allowed to right against. You crusaded as hard as you possibly could for the last 10ish years to censor many people just because they don't agree with your ideology/opinion. This isn't even debatable; there are a huge number of documented cases even in liberal media outlets like CNN that can be cited to prove it.

That being said, if you think it's a bad thing, then get your party to start acting right before pointing fingers. Jesus, censoring is by far...BY FAR...the biggest valid complaint anyone can have against liberals in the last 10 years and you want to show off how awesome your hypocrisy skills are by trying to vilify others for it now?

When nobody is legislating the legislators, this is what happens. Who is going to make the laws to stop them? It won't be them, that's for sure.

A guy kills a rich person because of liberal ideology...not terrorism.

Some drunk protestors take things too far and enter a government building and mock the office...KILL THEM ALL FOR BEING INSURRECTIONISTS!!!!!!!

Double standards are a liberal's best friend. Where we should all be championing the utmost penalties for both situations, people hate each other so much now over their political religion that we can't even do that.

"Here comes another round of red states sticking their hands out and Cankles telling them fug off."

Here comes another round of liberals claiming how a, so far, hurricane season has been incredibly mild but one tropical storm means global warming is killing us all right now!!!! RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!!!!

Forgot to finish that post with a quote I've been saying for years here and anyone who has been here long enough has seen it...

"What one party does, so will the other...it's only a matter of time."

This has been true ever since I was old enough to understand politics. Those 4 decades have proven me right over and over again.

"Our country is ------.
---- all magat scum

The ONLY reason, and it's not debatable or unclear, that this even became a thing was because of cancel culture. If you don't like people being canceled because of what they say, liberals shouldn't have been fighting so hard to do it. Out of all the liberal hypocrisy that is ruling your party today, THIS is by far the most egregious. To ignore the last 10+ years of liberals canceling every single person they could find that said things that didn't agree with liberal ideology is just absolutely absurd. Someone like Trump gets elected almost solely because of liberal actions.

"You MAGAt scum have nobody else to blame but your cult leader Trump for her death."

And you DR lib kids have only yourselves to blame for the MULTIPLE people who have died because of illegal immigrants. And there are way more of them than people who died because of Trump being elected. ----, even a Rep is dead because of Trump being elected (according to liberal ideology).

So the real question is, what gives you the right to give high value to one person but not to another? I mean, I assume that's your intent by ignoring all the deaths caused by liberal ideology.

Wow that is some spin.

1) ""There was no indication from when I met with him that he was a violent man or that he was interested in hurting anybody.""

Yeah, most people with DUIs aren't violent either, so I guess we should just ignore all the deaths caused by DUIs..including the family member I have who died from one and a close friend whose life was completely changed after getting hit by one while riding his bike, any people you may have had close to you who have been impacted by a reckless driver. What a freaking stupid quote about people who have a history of bad driving (and not even protecting their kids).

2) If you are going to spin the news about someone causing violence against an authority to be the authority's fault, then you HAVE to also blame liberals and their open borders ideology for allowing people like this into the country allowing them to be put into these situations.

Come on DR lib kids. This is one of the worst spin jobs to post on any outlet. Anything like this from either side should be immediately demonized by everyone for being partisan hate fodder just to spread hate.

"Right wing violence" is just a liberal's way of saying any violence done that can be attributed to right leaning ideologies, like racism. It's no different than "left wing violence" is attributed by Reps to be any violence that can be attributed to left leaning ideologies, like illegal immigration.

When it comes down to it, 90% of right or left wing violence is not political at all, it's stupid people doing stupid things that neither side approves of. Problem is, people so groomed by their party are not capable of accepting what stupid people do and must somehow equate it to something the other side did. I'm not sure why but it's pretty much defined American politics now. I think it's because of ego and, now that we are divided by violence, each side wants to blame the other side for the problem. And all that does is devolve America more and more.

So, I just hope all of you are happy you are helping America fail. Seems kind of stupid to do in a land that provides so much opportunity to the masses but whatever.

And prominent Dems are on record saying Trump should be killed, Israel should be destroyed, Jews should be erased (yet Reps are the Nazis...riiiiiight), Biden threatened to run over a journalist, and on and on and on and on and on.

Anything liberals say that is 100% hypocrisy is doing two things...1) ensuring they lose future elections they don't want to lose and 2) ensuring less people actually listen to what they have to say. Case in point, Trump was able to be elected in a pretty convincing manner.

No matter how you spin whatever topic you are trying to gain political points on, when the spin contradicts reality and logic then you have to ignore it. First off, in the UK, knife violence is a significant problem. It doesn't matter that they have no access to guns, they still violently hurt people.

Second and most importantly, this has nothing to do with gun violence. This has to do with someone making the conscience decision to kill someone else. The tool they use means VERY little when there are a LOT of ways to kill someone if someone so chooses. Making this about gun rights only serves to blame the victim and not the criminal. Liberals go nuts when someone says, "She was asking for it" when it comes to rape. Because blaming the victim and not the criminal is very wrong. By saying that a shooting is because, "The person had the right to carry a gun" is no different. The criminal is the one who made the decision to do something bad. You DR lib kids are defending the criminal because you don't like what tool they used to commit the crime. That statement alone means your rhetoric is no better than Kirk. One could logically and rightfully say you support anarchy and all of the violence and death that comes with supporting criminals. Thus, the whole "Kirk supported tyranny and violence" is also what you are doing.

It all boils down to the fact that both sides can blame the other for supporting violence and/or destruction if you spin the information. WHICH IS WHY VIOLENCE AGAINST SOMEONE ELSE WITH A DIFFERENT IDEOLOGY THAN YOU IS WRONG 100%. Very, VERY few politicians in America actually support violence against anyone; they support causes they believe in for the betterment of living in a society. Just because you don't agree doesn't make that person tyrannical, inciting violence, etc. And it definitely doesn't give EITHER side the right to support assassination. But both sides go to the extreme to try to get political points and it's disgusting. A Rep saying they don't want laws that cater to a specific demographic like trans people is FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR different than someone saying they want violence against trans people.

A Dem saying they support immigration so people can get away from oppression is FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR different than someone saying they are happy immigrants are killing, raping, etc. American citizens. And these are just two example of the extremes both sides go to to try to justify when violence occurs that meets their ideology. And, whether you choose to ignore this or not because I've cited it multiple times, but multiple prominent Dems are on record supporting and encouraging the BLM riots that caused destruction of local businesses and even harmed many people, including several deaths. So, based on how many liberals have responded to Kirk's death, Dems MUST agree that it is OK to kill those Dems because they supported violence and destruction.

The extremists on both sides feel violence is necessary when someone has a different ideology than you. Which is why we are now no better than ME countries ruled by religion who continue to kill each other because "My religion is right and yours is wrong", but in America it's, "My party is right and yours is wrong."

So freaking pathetic. And what's more pathetic are the people in those parties who don't bring down the strongest penalties for acting that way when they do. Instead, they try to justify it to avoid their party looking bad.

"We can condemn political violence and Kirk's murder while also condemning Charlie Kirk for the rotten, vile hatred he fomented."

Oh no the hell we can't. Liberals already normalized attacking people with different opinions. Liberals already normalized destroying someone's life because they don't have the same ideologies. Burying your head in the sand when it's your party being violent but then pointing fingers when it's someone else is absolutely why this country won't survive, or at least will become just like religious countries who kill each other over belonging to different sects. And I'm not saying liberals started this, just that liberals aren't innocent in any way and have behaved just like cons...and vice versa.

Reps have condemned for quite some time now all the murders, rapes, etc. that occur because liberals want open borders. That is fomenting rotten, vile hatred. Any objective person can see this and any intelligent person can see how they are the EXACT SAME THING. Dems and Reps have done this for so long now that neither side can even see anything different. That's just how our country is and it won't change. Case in point...

"As usual, the right takes an actual grievance, accelerates it under the guise of "but they ddiiiiiiiid it toooooo" and is far worse than anyone or anything they previously criticized."

What about gerrymandering Dems did in the 90s but now they are whining and crying that Reps are doing it to the significant level they did back then? What about liberals who cry about police and then pay top dollar for security? What about Dems crying about if you don't cater to trans then "the blood is on your hands" but when Reps cry about not catering to illegals who rape, kill, etc. you all of a sudden don't understand English.

Once again, pointing fingers while ignoring all the bad your own party has done is terrible. We NEED to be two separate countries at this point solely because of people like you. You have just as much right to spew your ideologies and opinions that Reps do but people like you can't live with others who don't accept your ideologies and opinions. Which, even a 10-year-old can understand how that just makes things worse.

Your statement is unbelievable when there are so, so, soooooooooooo many examples of Dems doing the same exact thing you are whining about. All of this is part of documented history...much of it recent. You can't argue it without being seen as illiterate. You can't say what you said without being a hypocrite. So, why are you choosing to spread hate and misinformation instead of working to solve the negatives your party does that are just like the other party?

This is absolutely no different than the ideology liberals have that if someone kills a bunch of people, we should let them live in society with no penalties and he/she should be free to kill more. One side wants to kill those people, the other side wants those people to be free to kill others.

Both sides are freaking stupid yet they can't take 5 minutes away from vilifying the other side to see how much their own villainy is hurting people.