So we are completely forgetting about Obama now, got it.

The reality is that the events of 60 years ago have become a rarity. It has been replaced with a Dem party who wants inequality and only equity. A Dem party who wants race to stay at the forefront of politics to ensure race issues always exist so they get votes. There are many real-world examples of politicians who run something fighting to ensure that something stays relevant, and this is just the next version of it.

"And, Mississippi has changed from then... how?"

It's incredibly easy to tell how it has changed but since you can't bother to look at the situation objectively, you continue to spread propaganda to ensure race stays an issue. First off, a news story like that would probably not have even made the news back then. If it did, it wouldn't have been to spread news, it would have been to spread hate. Additionally, those events were much more common but not reported, which was proven by a professor in the 90s which I can't remember his name now but I remember his research. Secondly, how any black people have killed white people? That number has increased significantly since 60 years ago. And, there is evidence in many cases they targeted the white person because they looked like an average white person who has money.

The fact you even try to insinuate that little has changed since 60 years ago is the entire problem. Today, we have a race of people who are struggling to do for themselves. Back then, we had a race of people who had no option to do for themselves. It's a completely different battle, one that still includes a little racism but has more to do with geographical culture and access to resources they need. But Dems are too busy fighting the battles of 60 years ago and not modernizing and fighting the modern battles we face today. Which is very sad for a group of people who call themselves progressive.

The only reason Dems are happy is because she is a black woman and young. They aren't sailing on her accomplishments, she has very little. They aren't sailing on how she handles herself in pressers, she hasn't had any. They aren't sailing on her priorities, many are not happy and have been vocal they aren't happy about them.

Dems like shiny new toys. I get it. People like Trump are old and haggard. It's human nature. Unfortunately for Dems, the shine of a new toy is all they care about, leaving whatever is beneath skin surface to fate.

Awesome! So now Reps get a chance to ignore the situation, say Trump is more fit than an ox in heat, and completely lie to the American people about his abilities and mental aptitude.

I mean, if Dems can do it, Reps can definitely do it.

""Anybody who's about beating down other people is a coward.""

Wow. Every day we get new trash talk against Reps. Every day we get more liberals, even prominent Dem leaders, saying how bad everyone is who thinks differently from them. We even have liberals putting down women who aren't liberal. But, anyone who does that is a coward. Once again, liberals prove hypocrisy is their platform. Like when Ellen sat next to W and liberals went nuts and demonized her for saying we should all be friends.

These aren't made up incidents. These happen regularly. Sure, both sides do it. But for a party to brazenly expose their hypocrisy like this only shows they are using hypocrisy as a weapon, not to make any valid points.

To liberals, the only correct response to being attack is to roll over and cry, and then run to a safe space and let the attackers do and have everything they want. They've made that point crystal clear so there is no reason to debate it. But damn, not having any empathy during the exchange makes his statement depressing.

" For now, mainstream/centralized candidates
rule the Left, and right wing Nut jobs rule the Right."

Good cookie-cutter response! I know it's borrowed from Reps saying there is no extreme Right and it's just a bunch of extreme Leftists and center Right, but that's hypocritical politics and is done all the time by both sides (arguable, with a ton of evidence, more by the Left in the last decade but Reps had their times). But I do think it's terribly sad that, given all the evidence, you make a statement that the Left is centralized. There are so many quotes from the Left that could break the DR site if I tried to post them here that proves the contrary. Ignoring them doesn't make your point valid, it makes your point absurd and ridiculous...and an obvious lie like Dems have increasingly been doing. No hard feelings though, Trump made lying fun, I get it.

It's not BS in any way given all of the facts that have been released. Just because you don't like there is a negative doesn't make it bs...which is typical of liberal fact-checkers.

The best we can describe it is semantics. I do think he has used the exaggeration for gain but not maliciously. It's not like he's saying he did the best job ever in the position or made huge accomplishments. But, by the written rules, his title was not formal. He knows it and so does almost every other person in the military. They don't have ambiguity in their formal government documents, it's plainly written what he had to do to achieve that rank and he didn't do it. Case closed. But Reps don't need to be using it like it's some sort of justified attack against him. Semantics are the last thing that should be used for demonizing someone.

"Pres Putin calls a possible Ukraine incursion into Russia a major provocation???

So, what then does Pres Putin call his unprovoked invasion of a sovereign Ukraine?"

Exactly what I thought while reading. In war, being surprised by "major provocations" means you are a terrible commander. That's what war is about. But, this may give us a glimpse into the situation though. Maybe Putin is so dumb he didn't even know what war was until this. It's got to be the only answer. So now he is surprised because he didn't know what war meant and is now realizing his mistake...

And that's a FANTASTIC situation and I'm so glad to hear a politician doing that. Just like Lincoln, who has multiple quotes on record saying he can never accept a black person as his equal and other things like that. But, regardless of how he felt, he did what was right for the country and its people. It's great to see Trump emulating that type of governance and is the type we need holistically. The fact that liberals mock it speaks volumes...but also shows why Dems fought for slavery, I guess.

Well, hopefully he (and Dems) learned from his EV mandates to actually build the infrastructure first to support the alternative instead of just blindly making mandates. You won't win if you mandate people do something different but don't have the support structure in place to actually use them to near-effective levels as what you got rid of. I know to most people this is common sense, but in the political world common sense rarely translates.

Let me give the cookie-cutter partisan responses now so people can discuss more important parts of this report.

Libs: That's because liberal media is the best thing ever and everything they say and do is 100% true and perfect and nothing could ever be better!
Cons: Obviously this is fake news because liberal media does nothing but lie and support Democrat corruption at all levels!

Ok, now people can reply with informative and thought-provoking comments since we got the partisan stupidity out of the way. Feel free to copy/paste about every other news outlet, just change the Libs and Cons based on the leaning of the outlet.

Btw, that's one reason I don't like Trump. He set the bar so low for any leadership that Reps are treating his antics as commonplace. Dems are now just trying to one-up him and make their own party run by inexperienced, not fit for the job politicians.

I mean, other than the predictable liberal slant using extreme words to describe something that will vanish in a week's time, the point is valid. The question she asked Trump was an attack and it came off as an attack, but the question is one in which Trump should already have a cookie-cutter answer for if nothing else. He failed miserably at a topic he should have an automatic answer for.

"Trump will none-the-less flip out when on the stand vs. an experienced prosecutor like Kamala Harris and when bumping up against the sane, intelligent, but folksy humor of former Command Master Sergeant Tim Walz. What will the GOP and its gazillionaire donors do when their candidate for the next Reich falls to pieces under the pressure?"

So, so, so, so pathetic when people herald someone just because they don't like someone else. Harris is an experienced prosecutor? Wtf is that garbage? Just because you don't like Trump doesn't mean anyone who doesn't like him is all of a sudden the second coming of Jesus. She is very inexperienced and not fit for the job by any means. To a Dem, they automatically think "Trump sucks!!!!!!!!!" just because he is on the other side. No, they immediately try to make the people on their side look like the best politicians ever in the history of ever.

It's OK, you can use reality to form your opinions. If someone isn't a good fit, it doesn't matter what the other side has available. Work on getting people who ARE fit for the job, don't just let the lowest common denominator pass muster just because you don't like who they are running against.

Well, when Dems have normalized attacking people based on their demographic, it's obviously going to become mainstream and garner less attention. This is straight up common sense and how almost every topic in the world is treated. Dems are on record many, MANY times talking about Trump voters and how they are bad people, need their heads examined, etc. but it's OK for them apparently. But then they get their toddler pullups all in a bunch when a Rep does it. In fact, there are FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR more egregious attacks against Jews that have come from US liberals in the last year that actually seeing a liberal article like this is pathetic. It's even more pathetic that this can't be denied, it's all out there for the entire world to see, just a few keystrokes away.

So sad to see how hypocritical Dems have become. They scream how much they want the attacks to stop but then go right on and continue the attacks. And the part that is even more sad is liberal voters don't seem to care. They let the behavior continue solely because their Dem leaders have groomed them so well and they are afraid to say anything bad about their party. And you can't fix anything until you actually admit there is a problem. But Dems don't do that, they admit to all of the problems everyone else has but as soon as their flaws are exposed, they go into safe space mode.

"If Trump wins, Vance will be a heartbeat away from the presidency " and that should give everyone palpitations of their own."

Once again, like every single election cycle, people say the same thing over and over. If Vance gives you palpitations but Harris doesn't, you have major issues.

Jesus, I had to stop half-way through to put my tinfoil hat on. Anyone who uses any of this garbage to form your opinions needs to do everything they can to not vote. Considering this same article can be written about some of the rich people controlling the Dem party just with different names, not seeing this as a systemic issue and thinking it's a partisan issue means you are wholly incapable of making good decisions when voting.

Broken record. To liberals, every allegation against a Rep is true and is the worst thing ever. But, when allegations are brought against Dems...crickets.

Quite sad how partisan politics just enables our politicians to continue being corrupt.

It's a shame liberals have no objectivity in their heads whatsoever so when they see someone make a point, they immediately accept it or hate it depending on if it meets their narrative. Here, I'll take a stab at some of the statements this guy tried to use as ammunition:

"Only one candidate has suggested the execution of a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff."
And multiple liberals have, in a matter of a few years, eluded to Trump should be dead..and I'm talking well-known liberals, not just some guy off the street. And to make the point even better, you can search on DR for all the times DR lib kids have made statements about wishing Trump were dead and things like that. So, if death threats are something you don't like, stop allowing your own party to do it and get away with it.

"Only one candidate has called our war dead " specifically, the Marines who fell at Belleau Wood in France during World War I " "suckers" and "losers.""
Biden himself said the military is full of stupid bastards. I'm sure liberals will say "yeah, but you are missing context, he meant it as a joke". Which would be fine, if liberals actually cared about any context from the other side. Liberals have already proven multiple times this year that many things they do need context but when attacking the other party, they refuse to accept any context. Go ahead, try to argue that. You won't win.

Oh wow, so an ex-POTUS who has good relations with foreign leaders. One who didn't have wars in his term. One who actually signed peace deals in places that haven't seen anything like it in modern history. Sorry DR lib kids, but you are actually making your case less strong in the eyes of independent thinkers who maintain some level of objectivity.

"I'd like to ask Trump how many maternity hospitals does Putin have to destroy before he condemns him as a war criminal and mass murderer?"

Why do you completely ignore Trump's rhetoric the last two years about ending the Ukraine war. And the last couple month's of rhetoric making it a top priority? Yet, Kamala completely flips on SEVERAL key topics and liberals follow behind her like her farts smell like bread baking?

In other words, it wouldn't matter if Trump came out and condemned all of it directly and said it is the worst thing since viruses. Liberals would ignore it just because Trump has good relations with world leaders. As usual, it just sticks to the "say anything to get votes" platform Dems have been using.

Out of all things politically motivated, this is the hardest one for me to understand because I just cannot fathom how people would willfully ignore their own hypocrisy.

We get articles all the time of people of all races, ages, etc. getting death threats, even for the most trivial things like chicken sandwiches. White coaches get death threats. White politicians get death threats. White athletes, executives, etc. ALL get death threats and they are in articles regularly. And, here's the kicker that's really going to cause the DR lib kids to respond with their typical name-calling and demonizing...the ones that are reported aren't just Rep. There are a lot of liberal ideologies attacked and the people doing the attacking get death threats. I know, it sucks but just because it sucks, it doesn't erase reality.

If we want to get rid of stupid people making death threats, 99% of which are people never meaning to do anything but technology allows them to stay mostly anonymous, then let's fight it at the source. Let's not allow it to be a partisan thing that both sides cling to when it meets their needs.

"Hillary was 100% accurate.. 'Basket of deplorables'"

So, speaking to what I said above, are Dems also deplorables when they make death threats? Or will your hypocrisy not allow you to ever go against your masters who have groomed you to not be objective for fear of being canceled?

Oh boy, liberals now using different types of whiteness to try to counter their beloved use of saying white people have no culture.

Liberals are the one who made whiteness trivial, so any whiteness a candidate uses to gain an advantage is meaningless. It's only non-white people who can use genealogy as an advantage. So, the point this discussion is trying to make has no relevance. Kamala is using it to gain an advantage...sticking to the whole "say anything to get votes" platform Dems have been on for the last 10 years or so. White people can't do that as liberals have pointed out so, so many times (because they think just being white, of any nationality, is already an advantage).

I can't really say this is a lack of common sense because I can see how understanding a debasement of your own making is difficult sometimes.

Every decade or two there is a new buzz phrase for politicians. Probably the worst I've seen in my life now is the liberal mantra "danger to democracy". While it was good when it started, liberals have made it so trivial and cliche with their use of it to describe everything that doesn't agree with liberal ideology.

Me: I just stepped on a bug
Liberals: OMG OMG OMG...THAT IS A CLEAR THREAT TO DEMOCRACY!!!!!

It has officially taken over the top spot, beating out the Rep's use of "Are you better off than you were 4 years ago" by Reagan. Even though it's still in use, it became grating to my ears to hear it in 1980 because it was like they used it for every single topic, even ones that had little bearing on the 4 years prior.

Just remember all you DR lib kids, the healthcare in those facilities are government run (or, the very least, government funded which forces the entities to conform to federal law).

While remembering that, remember YOU want the government to also run healthcare for the entire country.

If you can't connect the dots, you are a partisan person who has allowed yourself to be groomed by your party instead of being an independent thinker who actually has the ability to criticize your party. And it's not a bad thing to criticize your party so that they start acting right. Unfortunately, Dems have failed to do that.

Luckily, we have many developed nations who do let the government run their healthcare. And, fortunately for those who actually have been to those countries and understand the dichotomy, you also can plainly see the comparisons between US prison healthcare and the healthcare of those countries. And I'm not trying to be mean about it, it's obvious those countries' healthcare systems aren't run like what we see in US prisons...but the negatives of government healthcare DO match up. And, until Dems find a way to counter those negatives so they aren't so negative to the entire country, the current iteration of government healthcare Dems want is fraught with too much corruption and negative impacts to the masses. I'd love universal healthcare IF someone could find a way to do it that wouldn't lessen the healthcare I get today. And it will, there is no doubt about that at all. Just like there is no doubt about it that it would probably be cheaper in the long run for everyone (even with taxes going up to pay for it). So, while there are some positives to it, the negatives are too much and that can be plainly seen by understanding the relationship of the socialized healthcare to our US prison system.

Yeah, it's sad that Dems don't want fairness. They either want everything to run through their biased news networks or not be run at all. Trump already debated the Dem POTUS nomination on a liberal network. Why don't liberals want fairness? Why do liberals constantly say Reps are an attack on democracy and then immediately make attacks on democracy?

I'm all for debating between the two in a fair, balanced way. I want to hear them both out. But not at the cost of removing fairness from the situation.

It is absolutely hilarious to see liberals loving some white people now. I get it though, as long as they fall in line and accept the grooming, liberal leaders are happy.

Any sane person would be horrified at all of the disinformation coming from both parties. The only ones that aren't are the ones who have been so completely groomed by their party to think a certain way that they refuse to believe their party does anything wrong. And, unfortunately, that demographic is only growing which is really hurting this country.

"It's the 'Wild West' out there baby! Anything is fair game!

But it's not. We have hundreds of thousands of laws, if not millions, across the country that ensures it's not the Wild West. Problem is, and I really hate to blame one party for this but in this case the proof is in the pudding, Dems are so busy trying to make sure people are not held responsible for breaking those laws that it is becoming more like the Wild West. Dems are so busy changing laws to protect the criminals instead of the victims that it does seem like anything is fair game. Which, if you are an objective person, you can see is the EXACT thing that Reagan did but instead of learning from it and not doing it again, Dems are one-up'ing each other to do it.