Here we go again...Americans passing the blame off to anyone but themselves. This just makes it easier for everyone to make sure their own ego isn't impacted and to make sure they are not responsible for anything when it comes to fixing the problem. It's very sad.

I had no idea people got tax credit for sending kids to public school. Wtf? Just another Republican way to cater to the rich. So citizens pay for public schools and then turn around and have to pay for private schools too. Sounds to me like they aren't private then?

Sweet, Dems have something else to love about China while they hate on America.

That's usually the stage that comes after the other party clings on to every piece of evidence and ignores all other evidence about something. Revolving door partisan hate. It won't be fixed until people learn to be objective and not haters.

Meh. Do a Google search for research about higher numbers and then do one for research about lower numbers. You will get evidence that both sides are correct. The only thing we can know for sure is that there is no way to know if covid numbers are real. Yet both sides still want to only use the evidence they like and report it like it's a plague or not a concern.

"It's not rocket science to trace IP data to bad actors"

Actually, no it's not. It's only easy when the bad actors are known and have static assignments that are publicly available. There are a lot of easy technologies that make it next to impossible to identify bad actors, hence why any time you report being hacked or breached to authorities, they basically just say OK and move on. Making it even more difficult are the honeypots that bad actors create that are technically reverse honeypots to attract authorities while they use other means to carry out attacks. There are a huge amount of issues with finding bad actors. And once they are found, it takes them a few minutes to migrate their acting to hot nets that allow them to spin up their bad activities by a flip of a switch.

And even when they do find them, it's next to impossible to do anything about it if they are in a foreign country. So if there is a critical technology that people rely on to do something, and you just block people from using it...now you have a people problem. Let's say Huawei is bad and one day they perform a world-wide attack. If that infrastructure is in place to service millions of cell towers, what are you going to do...just turn them off and leave people without cell service?

Imagine if social networking existed during Lincoln's time. The Civil War would have never happened and slavery would still exist. He consistently made racist quotes. But he knew that how one man feels is not what America is about and that all men should be treated equally in the eyes of the law. Imagine that happening today. The Left would never end their smear campaign on him...I mean, if you ignore the fact that Dems fought to protect slavery so they would have done it anyway. But even if they weren't for slavery, they would have admonished him to no end. Just like they are doing today. The Left does not like free speech. They want to control all speech they don't agree with and want to legislate the same way. They haven't changed from the Civil War days except now they use try to cater to morality to get their way. The Right may legislate off of money and greed (which is no better) but at least they are OK with people being able to exercise their first Amendment rights. And their second Amendments rights, while we are at it. Still waiting for them to encroach on the 3rd Amendment and proclaim all looters and rioters soldiers of a racism war and force people to quarter them for the sake of morality.

Rofl...so now it's a plague. There's no end to the exaggeration and fear mongering of the Left in regards to covid, just so they can get more votes. Neither party has yet to realize that getting votes based on fear only spreads fear and hate.

Two articles on Drudge with two very different conclusions (one saying there is a spike and another saying there isn't) but use the same Leftist spin. Lib hypocrisy has gotten so bad that you can't even hide it effectively anymore.

Numbers also show that the cop abuse the nation has rioted and looted about are completely inexcusable but Libs don't seem to care about that. After some of the other articles on Drudge today, it's very clear that Libs either are terrible at math or they just don't care.

AHahahahahahah. All of the data trackers clearly show the US has spiked upwards. What a dumb article. Just more people trying to spin numbers and try to get people to not believe their own eyes.

I mean, there's a lot of crap on every media outlet there is but this one is one of the most shocking. Because some cities didn't spike then all of a sudden it means there is no spike at all. One of the worst conclusions ever made considering anyone can go to any number of sites and see the numbers and realize numbers have spike greatly. I mean, there's articles now that other countries are banning US citizens BECAUSE of the spikes being seen today. I mean, wtf?

There's a repercussion to choices. US citizens value freedom above everything. So having to enforce people to do something they don't want to do is a tough ask. Unfortunately, that means the parties themselves use the media and other political outlets to get their way which sucks and needs to be fixed, but it's all about freedom.

It's impossible that Libs can't see their own hypocrisy here. You hear crickets when people note that Libs supported protests and such that break safety rules but when someone on the other side does it, it's a problem? Both sides are so freaking blind.

And again, no evidence is given at all. All it takes today is to make a complaint and businesses have to be PC and make changes that may not have been a problem. No article I've seen so far has offered any proof that someone else was breaking the rule but not being given the same treatment as the black kid. The business had to make changes for no reason other than because a minority made a complain. When it's justified, that is a very good thing and if some video is out there that shows the other kid and an explanation of the rule so it proves racial bias, then the business should change. When it's not justified, it's just a political tool by Libs to force people to think like them or they want to silence them and force them to do things they shouldn't have to do.

So how many lives would masks save annually on all other sicknesses spread by the same landscape? I mean, if we are going to care about a virus that is going to run it's natural course and then become an afterthought like most others like it, let's really care about the whole thing. Let's not make it a political maneuver by Libs to spread propaganda anymore, which is all it has been. Let's discuss the entire spectrum of the problem and safety concerns. Do Libs not care about people who die by other illnesses that could be prevented or partially prevented by masks? That's very discriminatory and a human rights violation. Shame on you, Libs.

Anyone involved who got an order to cancel the funding would have documentation. There is no way this can be a conspiracy. There is either official documentation of it or there isn't. Nobody would cancel this over a phone call or anything so time will tell. Also, the article itself says it was HHS who cancelled it, not the White House. So why spin the title to be about the WH, I mean other than Libs know their followers only read headlines and believe everything that a headline says, of course.

One could easily surmise that someone on defense only stays on defense because there is constant offense. With Dems going way off the deep end this term, this is not surprising news.

I can't wait until Dems start seeing articles with accusations for a Dem POTUS from sources like "people close to the White House" and "sources close to the discussion". This is where journalism fails and proves people don't want the truth, they want whatever feeds their opinion.

"You crackers think its black and white. Grant was no friend to the natives. More than just white slaver statues have to go."

Hence All Lives Matter. But BLM ignores that. So don't go trying to flip the script now. BLM has ADAMANTLY voiced their opinion on the matter and supporters have said to the country that right now the focus must be on only black lives. When BLM will admit that there have been atrocities done to all races throughout history, THEN you can start trying to use this kind of logic. But for now, you are dead wrong in your intent. You definitely have a good premise but your focus has already been denounced by BLM.

What do you want him to say? "People got sick from a pandemic virus and died." Not sure why Libs need to be hand-held but I guess it's par for the course based on everything else they are unable to use common sense for. And Libs can't say the deaths are due to not locking everyone down anymore because they've already proven they don't want lockdowns based on their support of protests, riots, and looting. So the deaths are unavoidable. Unless, of course, Libs are saying that anything as a result of opinion means whoever holds a different opinion from them is wrong but if Libs support an opinion that results in deaths then the deaths are OK.

Meh, all of this will go away after the election. What Libs call human rights violations today are examples of incidents that have been happening for thousands of years yet Lib history stops going back past the ~16th century. Nobody is calling for the ban or removal of all Roman inspired artifacts in America, and they were a huge supporter of slaves. Nobody is calling for the removal of African artifacts from America and Africans were by far the biggest abusers of slaves in history...and they enslaved their own people along with those of specific religions. Sadly enough, many African nations still rely on slavery for political and economic gain. But yeah, .0011% of Americans dying because of an even less amount of troublemakers is cause for a national emergency.

It's just all noise until the election is over. It can't come soon enough. I have little patience around babies when they cry and that same exact feeling comes around every 4 years when Libs have to create mass hysteria about whatever their flavor of the day problem is. Sure wish they cared about sex slavery...seems that's a form of slavery they just ignore. Probably because the rich Dems aretoo busy being friends with the ones who support it.

"...but there is absolutely no quantifiable linkage between old people dying and economic collapse"

On a light-hearted note, have you been to a casino in the last 50 years? Man, if old people didn't exist, half the economy would fail it seems based on casinos. Actually, in my area, if old people didn't exist the main people who would be impacted are the rich native american conglomerates who run the casinos and the employees of those casinoa. So, in essence, by removing old people from the equation then you are significantly negatively impacting a group of people that Libs fight to protect.

The only reason I don't like books like this coming out is because people in America believe ONLY what they want to believe regardless if it is true or not. The number of anonymous sources in the news that people believe and trust is a true indication of this. Any media outlet could post a fake headline and many people will believe it. In fact, it's already been done and proven true.

Haha. It still amazes me in the 21st century we can't use enough of our brain cells to answer simple questions because both sides are too busy fighting only for their cause and ignoring any other valid cause. Nobody wants to admit there are negatives to their positives. The people have allowed the politicians to become just like them instead of the old days when people didn't trust politicians so they formed their own opinions, or at least accepted when a decision was made without making it out to be a national emergency.

"In both cases, after an assault, you'll have people saying they brought in on themselves."

Yes, mainly because Libs don't ever want to believe in personal responsibility. It's definitely not true that most cases are the fault of the victim, for sure. And it sucks people do that. But there are times it IS because of the victim. Libs want to ignore that and claim that nobody can ever be responsible for their own actions. So they legislate with that mentality, which assures that personal responsibility is removed from the law. Case in point...the 21st century. The social experiment Liberals have done for the last 4 to 5 decades has failed. We have enough proof that political correctness and removing blame from the person has only worsened our social issues. It's time a new plan is hatched. Maybe Libs can come up with something better. Maybe Cons can. Doesn't matter, all that matters is something changes the course we are on. Which it won't because Libs who read this comment will instantly scoff and just blame Cons for all of the problems instead of being objective and seeing that there are problems that need to be fixed that they caused. Cons won't either.