"Chatfield was on a list of senior military officers targeted as "woke" by the conservative American Accountability Foundation, which sent a letter to Hegseth saying that "purging the woke from the military is imperative."
Now, disagreeing with fighting against wokeness is not in question here. The question that has to be asked here, if you are trying to spread propaganda that Trump is sexist or discriminatory, is whether or not he is only targeting those who are of non-white, non-male persuasions. Yet, the quote above says "list", which infers there are more people involved. If that list is only comprised of Trump's disliked demographic, as you are insinuating, then you may have a point. Yet, all I can find is that he fired 10 people so far and one was a woman and one was black. I didn't try too hard to go through the list and figure out the demographic of each; however, based on what I have seen, it's VERY apparent that Trump is firing based on wokeness mentality and NOT because of discrimination.
So, the real question then is why are liberals spreading demonstrably false/fabricated insinuations about someone when they themselves claim to want to stop the spread of false/fabricated news? Again, whether or not you believe wokeness is a fireable offense is not in question so you have to take out your obvious partisan bias in order to be objective.
"We'll be required to wear powdered wigs soon. Unless you fall crosswise on Trump's Color Chart, which would dictate chains as a substitute."
Please provide evidence of your claims. I have yet to see Trump put anyone in chains, much less anyone of color. Please provide real-world evidence and not some rhetorical, highly-contextual partisan hate that only serves to spread more hate.
This is almost word-for-word what my reply was on DR years ago when Obama was being accused of catering just to black people, so you can't claim hypocrisy on my part. I prefer balance and not spreading hate. Looks like you DR lib kids want no balance and for hate to rule this country.