Liberals lost any clout they had in this fight when their hypocrisy causes them to refuse to support and empathize with those killed by illegals. Once liberals get a heart and stop thinking that pandering along ideological lines for votes, THEN they can enter the conversation. As it stands today, their protests are nothing more than succumbing to a sheep mentality by their party.

You can support illegals without holding illegal protests. You can ALSO support those killed, raped, etc. by illegals without claiming you are against illegals. Come to the table as adults and the country will back you 100%.

"Citing previous President's probably also illegal arresrts of foreign leaders to stop ethnic cleansing and/or mass murders doesn't make Trump's kidnapping of Maduro legal and when we boil it down legality is not the question; motive is. Preventing mass murder or ethnic cleansing are humanitarian moral necessities but invading to grab resources like oil is not just illegal it is also very immoral and cannot be defended except by noting economic benefits to American oil companies. That difference should be obvious except to the stupidest MAGAs who aren't capable of understanding the difference between a moral imperative and an economic opportunity."

This is why liberals are known as the group who can't see more than 2 feet in front of their faces.

What if the oil is being used by a dictator to fund mass murder and ethnic cleansing? Or being used to stay in power even when citizens voted you out so that he can spread more oppression? What about if the money is used to fund just one missile that ends up killing 100 people...is it moral to stop that or are you saying it's OK because it's moral? I guess to liberals the ends justify the means and only the means but we should ignore all of the means except the ones that agree with our opinion.

I'm not defending this situation at all but the short-sighted blinders are ridiculous. Go down the rabbit hole a little bit. Don't just stop at the dirt of the hole and say, "Hole bad!" Look at the dirt a little to see how dirty it really is. Go into the hole to uncover the moralities you so desperately want to base your opinions on. And be objective to them when you see them. I know that's asking a LOOOOOOOT from any partisan person but that doesn't mean it's not necessary.

I do find it very funny (also very sad) that how politicians feel are often so different than what the actual people feel.

But Dems can continue trying to make points based on how politicians feel all they want. That just allows for someone like Trump to get elected. Even in his first term when he was supposed to lose by a landslide...because liberals were too busy thinking that since most politicians felt one way then that means everyday citizens feel that way, too. Which is a very sad ideology because, when you take out any partisan impact at all, almost every single person accepts that governing by how politicians feel is a terrible way to govern.

I know that people on DR and liberals in general want the US to be controlled by China's trade, but these are still considered nonrenewable resources. China's supply isn't going to last forever and as the inventory gets lower, that means China will raise prices. So why do liberals want Americans to pay more for products instead of trying to get rid of dependence on Chinese imports?

And you can't say that you don't want this to happen. That's exactly what all of you have been fighting against during this Trump term. Please, just answer honestly and do not try to contextualize how you aren't fighting for China and not for the US. It's all out there in MANY liberal outlets, on TV interviews with liberal protestors, etc. It IS happening so don't just be more sheep and try to say otherwise. Just put down your honest answer as to why you want China to control all trade regarding raw materials. It's a simple question and I'm not fighting your opinion. I just want to know honestly why that is the liberal agenda. To me, it's just "The other side wants it one way so we have to inherently fight for the other way" that both parties do. But finding someone to actually admit that is impossible because, for some reason, party affiliation is more important than ethics and doing what's right.

I already said it when Obama was POTUS. EVERY President from here on out will be impeached. It's the extreme thing to do and both sides have gone to the extremes every single day.

It's a rural town so it was already forgotten about by the left since they want to eliminate all rural towns. And their gross profit has declined significantly since 2022 so this was already the trend, especially considering the scandals they have been involved in. Trying to blame Trump for the failures of Tyson management, while truly idiotic, is not surprising coming from the left. Trump does so many things wrong that this is EXACTLY why TDS was coined. No POTUS ever needs help illustrating his failures. It is only the people who live with the POTUS in their mind rent-free that have a syndrome where they can't stop being negative all the time and demonizing everyone who thinks differently from them.

In summary, it's better to do absolutely nothing than it is to try to fix a problem. But we didn't need a new article to describe how liberals have operated for a couple decades now. Lewis Black, a liberal so you can't get mad at me for quoting him, said "Republicans have nothing but bad ideas while Democrats have no ideas."

"How you like it now?"

It's not that bad, actually. Thanks for asking. It's pretty much just about the same as Biden's tenure. The only difference you have is completely disregarding any good that could have come from any Rep legislations while praising everything a liberal does as the gold standard for the entire universe.

Ok, so we can finally put one of the myriad of topics to rest that exists only because of partisan stupidity.

By reading this article and understanding the intent, and by reading liberal reactions, we can now say that boycotting a brand based on ideological beliefs if a very sound and acceptable way to show our support, or our disapproval. Right? We can all agree on that now, correct? The argument is over. Those who boycott are not hateful. They aren't trying to cause problems. They simply want their wallets to speak to their narrative because that's how a Capitalistic society works. End of story.

So, that means all the hate liberals spread about those boycotting Bud Light has to be taken back and liberals have to apologize.

I mean, it's either that or liberals finally just accept their hypocrisy and that they spread, "Everything we think is right but everything anyone else believes is wrong" narrative. Can't have it both ways. It's one or the other.

And before anyone says that Bud Light's boycotts was out of hate for those who do not subscribe to traditional gender roles, one could as easily (with empirical and proof-positive evidence) use context from illegals raping and killing women, and the liberals defending them, as hatred. Sure, that's only if you cherry pick context and get rid of context that doesn't agree with your narrative. But that is EXACTLY what liberals are doing in this case. Which means both liberals and cons are doing the same thing, only the topic is different.

I know this won't change anything. But the bigger fight America needs to have is to fight against that narrative as it has done waaaaaaaaaaaay more damage to this country than illegals, gender opposers, etc. And since it has done more damage, it's a fight more worthy than these stupid partisan fights that both parties come up with that never get fixed so we just pile on more and more hatred.

But we can pardon (and support) Hamas for killing 1200 civilians.

If liberals didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any standards. Would really be nice if one of the parties would come even close to practicing what they preach.