Uh huh. Or maybe they fostered a country where free speech is of paramount importance. And free speech does have its negative side too, as does systems of government that are anti-free speech. Unfortunately, it seems Liberals have to actually change America to be anti-free speech in order to find out what those negatives are. They love to spout all the good things about other countries but can't be bothered to look at the negative repercussions of the path they have put America on.

I mean, Dems want to be free to encourage and support looting, rioting and killing. But they don't want Cons to be free to do it. Picking and choosing the free speech you want others to follow only makes you a Dictator. Just saying.

Yet no mention at all about the molotov bombs at the pro-life place in Oregon. I'm so shocked that partisan people are ignoring one side of violence while crying like babies about another. Or, maybe Liberal logic is worse than I thought and they can't find a way to contextualize who would ever throw molotov cocktails at a pro-life office...hmmmmmmmmm, must have been those pesky right wingers too, amirite?

And don't take this one instance as if it is a one-off situation. Both sides do this. But since this is a Liberal leaning, or should I say so leaning it has fallen to the ground, rarely does any violence or hatred ever get posted on this site that is caused by the Left. In fact, CNN has made an entire business based around that so I'm not surprised it's here either. It's kind of indicative of the type of news that Liberal media posts. Ignore everything bad if it matches Liberal narratives but make sure to call out that the sky is falling when the Cons do it.

Such an old, tired strategy. I'm glad it's finally not working for Liberals and the masses have caught on.

"An estimated 936,911 excess deaths occurred during 2020 and 2021, of which 171,168 were not assigned to Covid-19 on death certificates."

Oh, how easy people are manipulated. Until they come out with research to validate the numbers of people who WERE assigned covid-19 as the cause but it actually wasn't, no conclusions can be made. I do believe the numbers err more on the side of excess deaths, for sure. But once we get a true count of those who were assigned covid-10 erroneously, of which there is ample evidence of it happening (but probably not as near as much as conspiracy theorists make it out to be), then we can make logical conclusions. If you do the math for both accounts, I would put money on it that the "excess deaths" numbers, while probably more, aren't as drastic as this article is suggesting.

Don't agree with me? Then do the work and provide true numbers to the contrary. Otherwise, anything you say is just partisan idiocracy.

There is more evidence of Hunter colluding or benefiting from China and Liberals ignore it like a murderer who illegally immigrated here. If it is wrong and worth writing about, then it's wrong for EVERYONE. I wish these two parties would figure that out and start being adults.

"But please, tell us again how White Male Privilege is a myth perpetuated by minorities and women."

Seriously? Woooooooooow. So all of the minorities who have committed crimes and are back on the streets killing or hurting people...of which we see articles all the time about...just doesn't play into your narrative? It is incredibly easy to show how wrong your intent is just by looking at the rate of "slap on the wrist" sentences are given to minorities regarding any type of violent crime.

This victim/guilt mentality is killing this country. There is real racism and real inequality issues out there that need to be fought but here we have people spreading fallacies that are easily disproven because they feel like a victim or feel guilty. Such a freaking shame.

Hilarious. I guess Liberals want every legal decision to come down to whether or not you support someone, and not the myriad of other repercussions of passing laws. It's as if Liberals truly think that every law that is put up for review only has one single context...ever. Remember when ACA was passing and all the Reps could ever say was that Dems support Socialism? They didn't seem to care it could help some people. All they ever considered was that Dems wanted Socialism so they used that as a scare tactic to spread hate.

Yeah, it's the same thing. After Biden's first few legislative actions after becoming POTUS where there was pork in everything, Reps have a right to scrutinize. Here, let me have a shot at doing what this author did:

"Dems Stand Firm that $40b should go to the Ukraine war instead of to minorities in America who need it to help fight inequality."

I can't believe Dems would not want to help fight inequality and would rather give it all to a predominantly white country. Shame on you!

There you go, anyone can do the same thing and try to incite partisan hate. It takes smart people to actually see it for what it is.

Um, Liberals have been trying to get rid of gender identities for a while now. Now that it's happening, they are complaining about it? Literally...wtf?

They probably won't. They will go after other decisions that have been made that gives the Federal government more power than is prescribed in the Constitution. And that's what the laws of many first-world countries do every single day. So, good for them.

Seriously, Dems want a country of one rule of law...Liberal law. While that's not bad in and of itself, when a country is designed to provide states the right to choose their own laws, it only logically means that any opposition to that is considered radical.

Actually, this isn't true at all. If you look at pro-choice vs. pro-life trends outside of any moment in time where abortion was a hot topic, you can see that it's usually 30ish percent are pro-life and 40ish percent are pro-choice. With the remainder saying it's OK after traumatic events such as rape.

So, technically, there is no clear majority. Trends show pro-choice has always had a bigger following but nowhere near the numbers Liberals love to claim when they find one single poll that they agree with.

Here is the absolutely most funniest thing about Liberal hypocrisy on this topic. Science says, and is considered absolute, that gender is determined at conception (chromosomes and such). Which means halfish of all fetus's aborted are female. Which means the whole argument of "My body, my choice" for women is actually taking away "my body, my choice" from females who are aborted.

I'm pro-choice and even I understand this flawed thinking.

No, it's not. It's a terrible thing the leak occurred. All Liberal media outlets are trying to do now is justify their abhorrent actions and hate spewing so that they can feel right. Most news outlets on both sides used to be a lot more subtle in their digs. This one just plays stupid and expects their readers to be stupid, too.

"What Was the Strategy Behind the SCOTUS Leak? Look Right."

Let me fix that. "What is the strategy behind anything that Liberals don't agree with? Look Right." And vice versa. Not really any need to spread hate over something that is status quo.

"Ahh Fisshy, face it. You pedophiles are chomping at the bit on this one, as rape and ------ are not grounds for abortions. I guess not enough raped kids out there having kids for the GQP, huh????? You and Boaz the Daughter Diddler are just SOOO HAPPY on this one. It legitimatizes your perversion."

So this is what Liberal accusations have devolved to. Not really much need for any kind of rebuttal; that statement says everything about the person who made it. Let the grown ups talk.

Same response here answers every other response regarding this leak...the states will decide. If you have an opinion that is so detrimental to your way of life, there will be states you can move to that allow it. That's what the US was built on.

Let me fix that for you...Biden will only cancel debt for people that he can then follow-up with to get votes. He would NEVER cancel debt for people who did the right thing and don't have to depend on the government, that's completely against the Democrat platform. It would be a lot more beneficial to focus first on all those people who have problems paying them back due to no fault of their own, like getting laid off because of current issues. But that would make too much sense. Instead, it's better to placate those who already depend on the government because that's how Dems operate.

"If you have trouble understanding why some folk may have issues with what he does as he leverages his wealth to sway public opinion"

Well, considering some people just came out with examples of when Twitter banned things that shouldn't have been banned because it didn't help Liberals, all that is happening then is that one rich group used a platform to sway public opinion and now another rich person has come behind them doing the same. If you cared at all about actually not using wealth to sway public opinion, you would have had a much bigger issue with Twitter before any of this happened. Maybe you did, I don't know. But many Liberals are up in arms because they aren't happy that a platform catering to Liberal ideology has been bought and will probably be used for a different ideology. If Liberals really cared about that, they would have attacked Twitter a long, long time ago.

Oh look, Biden is taking action on something because he believes it impacted his family. I'm glad his priorities are in place.

It's amazing how there were a LOT of examples from celebrities talking about killing Trump or showing pictures of bad things happening to Trump. There are examples of other elected officials being threatened like this by Dems. Yet, once again, reading the comments here makes it out to be Liberals are too good to do stuff like this. It's all out there, wide open on the Internet and you can even read the replies by the offenders who justified it.

If you don't like these types of threats happening, then call out your own party for doing it before going after the other party. All you are doing is saying it's OK to do except when it's against someone you agree with, and trivial mental capacity it takes to understand why that's bad shouldn't have to be said. What's happening is, in the comments above, so many of you are name-calling one side but those same comments can apply to your own side as well based on real-world evidence. So, the question still remains, WHY do you want to hurt the country like that?

Dems completely support and encourage multiple groups who actually have the words revolution and anarchy typed ON THEIR WEBSITE (well, the anarchy was stripped a while ago) and who freely attack government buildings, but then spend all their energy on attacking an old, egotistical guy who riled up a bunch of dumb people (so dumb one was wearing a dead animal as a helmet).

Both sides have CLEARLY illustrated they want to destroy today's Democracy, the only thing that is different is the system they want in place after it is gone.

Imagine if they were to provide shelter for their homeless...they'd need twice as much natural power. But instead, it's much easier to keep them homeless so you can make your state look good in other areas.

Yep, as usual, Dems protect minorities who agree with them but vilify any who don't. Just like they do with the rest of the populace.

They should have done it the Democrat way...just run away and hide until the time passes. That's the true measure of a politician to Dems, apparently.

Hostile takeover? He offered money and waited on a response. The fact Liberals think this is hostile is indicative of everything wrong with that party right now.

Becausew unions are a waste of time in their current form. People still think unions should be around for the good they did in the past, at times when people were fighting to reduce work hours from 10-12 hours a day, had very little government protection, and had very little regulations to ensure workplaces are humane. Dems today swear up and down that working conditions are the worst ever and everyone in the world is going to wither away from work fatigue if there aren't unions. Instead, they need to create more realistic goals that align with modern day environments.

Sigh...another Fox News/CNN clone. Some of these media outlets are just toxic. If one person complains about an issue, whichever party they belong to will come out and say, "Dems/Reps (depending on their affiliation) are completely against xxxxx." It doesn't matter that things are pretty much split down party lines. No, all that matters is the media outlet found someone or a small group of people for/against their agenda and then uses that as a misleading headline to believe it is a complete majority for/against it. I've even seen outlets use the same topic and say it's good/bad and citing a few people...or even much worse, social media posts...as their proof.