Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

qcp

Subscribe to qcp's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Friday, May 23, 2025

This is to say that if the government continues to spend on credit, and offers no clear path for arresting the growth of its debt, investors will demand ever higher interest rates on the money they lend to it. read more


Thursday, May 22, 2025

The Department of Justice today asked the Supreme Court to block a ruling that requires DOGE to provide information about its government cost-cutting operations as part of court-ordered discovery. read more


Greenland has allowed a Danish-French consortium to mine a rock which is key to the production of aluminum.


A provision "hidden" in the sweeping budget bill that passed the U.S. House on Thursday seeks to limit the ability of courts -- including the U.S. Supreme Court -- from enforcing their orders. read more


Friday, May 16, 2025

A second class-action lawsuit has been filed against Elon Musk's America PAC alleging that the group hasn't paid voters what they were promised for signing a petition during President Trump's 2024 campaign. read more


Comments

More: Dugan was indicted on Tuesday for allegedly concealing a person from arrest and obstruction. A day later, her lawyers argued in a motion to dismiss the case that Dugan is "no ordinary criminal defendant."

The motion argued that the problems with the prosecution were "legion," including the fact that they allegedly violated the U.S. Constitution's fundamental principle of federalism. But "most immediately, the government cannot prosecute Judge Dugan because she is entitled to judicial immunity for her official acts," it said.

As evidence, the motion cited the 2024 Supreme Court case Trump v. United States in which the court ruled the president had absolute immunity for "official acts."

The 6-3 ruling involved Trump's criminal prosecution over his attempts to overturn former President Joe Biden's 2020 election victory.

It didn't provide a standard for what counts as an "official act" or determine whether any of Trump's individual actions fell within that category, saying only that the lower courts needed to consider the case in light of the sweeping immunity afforded to the president.

Dugan's motion argued that the same standard should apply not just to the president, but to judges.

"Immunity is not a defense to the prosecution to be determined later by a jury or court; it is an absolute bar to the prosecution at the outset," the motion said.

The motion denied that Dugan had directed the defendant to leave through the jury door so he could evade ICE agents, but even if she had, "Judges are empowered to maintain control over their courtrooms specifically and the courthouse generally," according to the motion.

It also cited other evidence showing that judges have enjoyed immunity for official acts dating back to the 17th century in England, and carrying on through U.S. common law.

Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy