Those bounties may be the only way many(most?) people in that state are able to eat and pay rent once King Donald and President Musk pull the federal funds keeping that state afloat.

Unfortunately the Dems are absolutely spineless and will never do it.

More: "Hey, John, what's this all about? What's this a tour of?" Mr Trump reportedly asked John Kelly, his then-chief of staff, when they took a private tour in 2017 of the USS Arizona Memorial, a ship commemorating the surprise Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor during the Second World War.

"Trump had heard the phrase 'Pearl Harbor' and appeared to understand that he was visiting the scene of a historic battle, but he did not seem to know much else," write the authors, who quote a former White House adviser concluding the US president was "dangerously uninformed".

During a meeting with Narendra Modi, the Indian prime minister's "eyes bulged out in surprise", the Washington Post reporters claim, when Mr Trump told him: "It's not like you've got China on your border."

China and India in fact share more than 2,000 miles of common border.

Mr Modi's expression "shifted from shock and concern to resignation", with aides telling the authors the Indians "took a step back" in their diplomatic relations with the US following the meeting.

We'll be banning mRNA vaccines here shortly. Thanks RFK!!

I'm shocked, SHOCKED! /s

Now they're good cops.

#28,

Yep. Biden slapped even more sanctions on their oil exports and on the ships they use to carry that oil right before he left office and that oil was the only thing keeping their economy afloat. Russia wants sanction relief before they ever start talking about Ukraine. Trump, naturally, is chomping at the bit to give it to them.

Guess they missed the first time Hanks played the character in a previous black jeopardy sketch. It was probably the most humanizing portrayal of a MAGAt ever on TV.

More: "That was a direct assault on European democracy," alleged a German politician.

"It's very clear now, Europe is alone," confessed a senior diplomat.

The reporter asked the man if he now sees the United States as an adversary and he replied, "Yes."

Gideon Rachman, who was on hand in Munich for the outlet, wrote that the only thing that could considered positive was the allegation it was "puerile bulls---." However, he said it was ignored because it was "aimed at a US audience."

More: "He holds that position as a non-career Special Government Employee," Fisher wrote. "In that job, Mr. Musk is a Senior Advisor to the President."

The Justice Department defines a special government employee as "anyone who works, or is expected to work, for the government for 130 days or less in a 365-day period."

Fisher said it's not unusual for special government employees to advise the president, citing the example of Anita Dunn, who served as a senior adviser to former President Joe Biden.

"In his role as a Senior Advisor to the President, Mr. Musk has no greater authority than other senior White House advisors," Fisher said. "Like other senior White House advisors, Mr. Musk has no actual or formal authority to make government decisions himself. Mr. Musk can only advise the President and communicate the President's directives."

Fisher's declaration seems in conflict with Trump's previous statement that Musk leads DOGE. Trump has touted the cost-cutting operation, claiming it has identified "has found massive amounts of FRAUD, WASTE, INCOMPETENCE, AND ABUSE" within the government.

The filing came in response to a lawsuit by several Democratic state attorneys general, accusing Trump of illegally delegating executive powers to Musk in violation of the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

"Mr. Musk does not occupy an office of the United States and has not had his
nomination for an office confirmed by the Senate. His officer-level actions are thus unconstitutional," the lawsuit states.

Still, Trump has shown no signs of seeking to restrict Musk or DOGE.

More: The pervasive and nitpicky control of language is a crucial, but far from the sole, component of the woke-right movement. Like its antithesis on the left, the woke right places identity grievance, ethnic consciousness, and tribal striving at the center of its behavior and thought. One of the best descriptions I can find of it comes from Kevin DeYoung, a pastor and seminary professor, in a 2022 article called "The Rise of Right-Wing Wokeism." DeYoung, reviewing a book on Christian nationalism in The Gospel Coalition, argues that the book's "apocalyptic vision"for all of its vitriol toward the secular elites"borrows liberally from the playbook of the left." It "redefines the nature of oppression as psychological oppression" and tells white and male right-wing Americans that they are the country's real victims. But "the world is out to get you, and people out there hate you," DeYoung warns, "is not a message that will ultimately help white men or any other group that considers themselves oppressed."

Another hallmark of wokeness is an overriding impulse to contest and revise the historical record in service of contemporary debates. The New York Times' "1619 Project," which reimagined this nation's founding, was emblematic of this trend from the left. But similar attempts are happening on the right. Last summer, the amateur historian Darryl Cooper caused an uproar when he made the case, on Tucker Carlson's podcast, that Winston Churchill was the real villain of World War II.

The compelled politesse of the left has been swapped out for the reflexive and gratuitous disrespect of the right.

Speaking of falsifying reality: The Trump administration seems to be devoting a remarkable amount of energy toward making sure people call the Gulf of Mexico the "Gulf of America." In the White House press room last week, the administration went so far as to eject Associated Press reporters because the publication refused to alter its stylebook to comply with the change. "I was very up front in my briefing on Day 1 that if we feel that there are lies being pushed by outlets in this room, we are going to hold those lies accountable," the White House press secretary said. "And it is a fact that the body of water off the coast of Louisiana is called the Gulf of America." European exploration records have referred to El Golfo de Mxico since the 16th century.

Baldwin Park is in Los Angeles, genius.

More: Under the headline "Trumponomics and Rising Inflation," the WSJ team went on to systematically dismantle Trump's mental abilities. "The layers of intellectual confusion here are hard to parse," it wrote, before reluctantly going on to try and parse them anyway.

"Rising inflation means the Fed must be more cautious in cutting rates," it said, in a similar tone to that you might find in an eighth grade economics class.

"He has the analysis backward," they continued, "if he's trying to blame the Federal Reserve."

"Someone should tell him," about what was actually to blame for the potential for a pause in rate cuts (the Fed's "premature" half percentage point cut in September, apparently.)

#3,

You live here so it's gotta be top 5 at least.

As someone who was a PFC for a little while I can assure you they are indeed nobodies.

More: As Booker T. Washington taught, "A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, evil doesn't become good, just because it's accepted by the majority." Neither our past nor our present have to define our future. We can still become a nation that embodies the self-evident truth that all humans are created equal.

The Catholic church's horrific history of violence, murder and oppression makes MAGA look like mewling schoolgirls.

More: A DOGE operative, called a "DOGE Team Lead," will be assigned to every agency, department, etc., of the federal government. That team lead, who will presumably report to Elon Musk since Musk is the head of DOGE, will be in charge of all hiring and firing decisions at their particular department. The EO lays out a government downsizing plan in which only one new government employee can be hired for every four who leave service. It adds various new reasons for termination. And it puts the overall plan for the downsizing in the hands of DOGE, which is to say, Musk. And note here the relationship between the "DOGE Team Leads" and the heads of the various departments ...

(b) Hiring Approval. Each Agency Head shall develop a data-driven plan, in consultation with its DOGE Team Lead, to ensure new career appointment hires are in highest-need areas.

(i) This hiring plan shall include that new career appointment hiring decisions shall be made in consultation with the agency's DOGE Team Lead, consistent with applicable law.

(ii) The agency shall not fill any vacancies for career appointments that the DOGE Team Lead assesses should not be filled, unless the Agency Head determines the positions should be filled.

(iii) Each DOGE Team Lead shall provide the United States DOGE Service (USDS) Administrator with a monthly hiring report for the agency.

"Pausing Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement to Further American Economic and National Security"

"Peace is war, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength."

This man will never be able to get the taste of Trump's ass out of his mouth.

More: Consider Mid-Continent Steel and Wire, which produced roughly half of the nails made in the U.S. After the steel tariffs took effect, its sales plunged by more than half, causing it to lay off 80 workers. Another 120 quit because they worried its Missouri factory might close. After this damage, the Commerce Department granted the company a tariff exemption.

Auto makers were another casualty. Ford Motor said tariffs subtracted $750 million from its bottom line in 2018, which reduced profit-sharing bonuses for each of its workers by $750. GM said the tariffs dented its profits by some $1 billion, equal to the pay of more than 10,000 employees.

The tariffs also made U.S. manufacturers less globally competitive and prompted retaliation that hurt American businesses. Canada imposed tariffs on $12.8 billion in U.S. products, including 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum. Harley-Davidson shifted some production to Thailand to avoid Europe's retaliatory tariffs on U.S. motorbikes.

Retaliation caused Mr. Trump to exempt Canada and Mexico as part of the renegotiated Nafta deal. His Administration also struck deals with some countries that exempted a certain amount of their steel and aluminum exports.

Even so, the tariffs created uncertainty for U.S. manufacturers and boomeranged on steel and aluminum companies. Employment in durable goods manufacturing began to decline in early 2019, which reduced demand for steel and aluminum. Employment in fabricated metals manufacturing that used steel and aluminum plunged and is still some 35,000 lower than when the tariffs took effect.

U.S. steel and aluminum firms enjoyed a surge in post-pandemic investment and consumer spending, and profits rolled in. But demand for the metals fell again as U.S. manufacturing struggled amid President Biden's regulatory onslaught and higher interest rates. Domestic steel-making capacity utilization has fallen back to 70%, about the same as in 2016.

Which is why U.S. steel and aluminum producers now want tariffs with no exemptions. They blame imports for reducing prices. But steel prices are about 50% higher than pre-pandemic levels and aluminum prices a third higher. Cleveland-Cliffs shares rose 17.9% Monday, and other steel makers by 5% or so in expectation of windfall tariff profits.

This is political rent-seeking at its most brazen, and it benefits the few at the expense of the many. None of this matters to Mr. Trump, whose dogmatic views on tariffs can't be turned by evidence. But we thought our readers would like to know the rest of the story.

Sounds better than their previous business model of buggering little boys on camping trips.

More still: The role of the Treasury Department " and of the executive branch more broadly " is not to make determinations about which promises of federal funding made by Congress it will keep, and which it will not. As Justice Brett Kavanaugh of the Supreme Court previously wrote, "Even the president does not have unilateral authority to refuse to spend the funds." Chief Justice John Roberts agrees: He wrote that "no area seems more clearly the province of Congress than the power of the purse."

During our collective 18 years at the helm of the Treasury, we never were asked to stop congressionally appropriated funds from being paid out in full. Not since the Nixon administration has this type of executive action been contemplated. At that time, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the president did not have the power to withhold federal funds that Congress had authorized.

More: These political actors have not been subject to the same rigorous ethics rules as civil servants, and one has explicitly retained his role in a private company, creating at best the appearance of financial conflicts of interest. They lack training and experience to handle private, personal data " like Social Security numbers and bank account information. Their power subjects America's payments system and the highly sensitive data within it to the risk of exposure, potentially to our adversaries. And our critical infrastructure is at risk of failure if the code that underwrites it is not handled with due care. That is why a federal judge this past weekend blocked, at least temporarily, these individuals from the Treasury's payments system, noting the risk of "irreparable harm."

While significant data privacy, cybersecurity and national security threats are gravely concerning, the constitutional issues are perhaps even more alarming. We take the extraordinary step of writing this piece because we are alarmed about the risks of arbitrary and capricious political control of federal payments, which would be unlawful and corrosive to our democracy.