Everything he says is a lie.

It would be amazing if the Senate removes Trump and then he got reelected next Fall. He'd be rested and ready to go after a bit of a vacation. Sadly it's DOA if and when it gets to the Senate.

#15 | POSTED BY NUKE_GENTLY

A person found guilty in an impeachment trial can't hold federal office again.

#143 Trump is a criminal and a conman and should be impeached.

And of course Trump is already telling lies about the report.

He claims "This was an overthrow of government. This was an attempted overthrow, and a lot of people were in on it and they got caught" even though the report says nothing of the sort.

"I said, I'm telling you, you're not getting the billion dollars.' I said, You're not getting the billion. I'm going to be leaving here in,' I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: I'm leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the money.' Well, son of a bitch. He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time." Q.P.Q.

#14 | POSTED BY GREATAMERICAN

Are you trying to say that Biden, like Trump, committed a crime? If so then let's prosecute both of them.

If only there had been some good guys with guns to stop the "good guys" with guns.

The Pres is right.

#1 | POSTED BY SNIPER

You should see a doctor.

Keith Meister did the same thing to Ralcorp in St. Louis a few years back. Fortunately it was only one of many employers in the area.

Good riddance to that bought and paid for puppet of the 1%. I hope they paid him well for selling out America.

Is this Amazon's way of telling gamers that they need to--------?

Trump sold out America and our allies when he gave in to NK demands. Credit to Lil Kim, he has played Trump like a fiddle.

By "people" he means himself. I guess that is what happens when your diet is primarily mcdonalds and kfc.

Not much point in participating when they no valid defense.

creating human embryos with intention of killing them is definitely unethical.

#4 | POSTED BY SENTINEL

No it's not. There's no brain development or nervous system or pain felt. You want to explain ethics then how about you explain to us the ethical argument for child separation and imprisonment that is being carried out right now across our southern border?

I guess Barr is not familiar with the 14th amendment and what it says about equal protection under the law.

Got to wonder where his actual address is and if it would have affected his right to run for the office he holds and/or to vote for candidates in the district where the UPS store is.
#2 | POSTED BY DANNI

In the original article (behind paywall) it says he had multiple home addresses over the past few years, all in the same congressional district as the UPS store he uses for his mailing address. It would not have affected his right to hold office or vote for federal candidates but it would have changed which local candidates he had on his ballot.

#3 - that was exactly my thought.

This makes me wonder if Durham has found something that the IG missed.
#8 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

Hook, line and sinker.

What if the Supreme Court upholds his tax returns must be turned over and he moves to try to block his financial institutions from doing so?

The only way the WB can actually claim any firsthand account of this is if he was listening in on the call.
If he was listening in, he wasn't authorized to do so and most certainly broke the law if he did.
#99 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

Your claim is not consistent with the IG's assessment which explicitly states the wb has both authorization and that he complain contains both first hand and second hand knowledge.
What information can you provide that shows the IG assessment is wrong?

That is pure speculation. We've been presented with ZERO evidence of any firsthand knowledge by the WB.
#93 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

Why do you keep telling that lie when the IG has validated that the wb did provide first hand knowledge? Do you reject the IG's assessment? What information do you have that demonstrates the IG is wrong?

I am pointing out the obstacles that lay before this if this impeachment push ever becomes real.
#93 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

No, what you are doing is repeating the GOP lies about the complaint.

Fact is so far Democrats have failed to make a compelling case for impeachment based on the fact that public polling has barely moved since this process started. #85 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

Your boy Trump has told us over and over that the polls are wrong and can't be trusted. Are you trying to now tell us that he is wrong?

Yet the Schiff aid failed to instruct the WB to disclose their communication on the form as was required. Then there is the problem with the fact that the WB checked off a box on the form indicating firsthand knowledge but never once indicated firsthand knowledge in the complaint itself. In the absence of firsthand knowledge the complaint never would have even been looked into in the first place. If this is truly a serious impeachment those issues absolutely will come up and they are legitimate in the broad sense of trying to remove POTUS from office via this process.
#72 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

Both your first and second sentences are false.

We know from the IG's letter to the Director of National Intelligence on Aug 26 about the whistleblower complaint that the wb did disclose communication with both Schiff and Richard Burr's office. Why do you think that his contact with Schiff's staff is constantly being brought up by the GOP and their waterboys such as yourself but you never hear mention of his contact with the Republican Senator's staff?

We also know from the IG's assessment of the wb complaint from Sep 30, the same assessment that revealed that the wb had checked that direct knowledge box, that the IG determined that the wb had "official and
authorized access to the information and sources referenced in the Complainant's Letter and Classified Appendix, including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct."

I don't think that you can backup the accuracy of your third sentence. In fact, if what you claim was true then what's the point of having Government audits or an Inspector General's office at all if you are going to take the stance that second hand reports are unworthy of review because what else is an auditor other than a 2nd hand researcher?

And I sure do hope that the issues you mention come up because the answers are already known and it shows that those of you who keep repeating them over and over are liars or are ignorant of the findings of the IG's office.

A Republican just walked away from a not guilty plea.
That should make you all happy

#30 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

Alternative take...the same Republicans who knew he committed a felony and still nominated him will learn nothing from his and his wife's guilty pleas and will pick another corrupt turd next year. What's to be happy about?

#9 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

Your attempt at humor is lost when you are constantly tossing GOP deflections like you do.