And more in the link

#14 | Posted by goatman

YOur own link says the deal gave russians a financial interest in the company. Not that the company sent uranium to russia. You probably bought the fox news propaganda about hillary selling uranium to russia didn't you?

Why do you lie so much? I keep asking you this question, but you won't answer. You're lying problem is pathological. I don't understand why you engage in it. If you don't have anything valid to say, just keep your mouth closed. Don't feel compelled to lie.

#58 | Posted by goatman

You keep asking that question as a dodge.

"I don't support trump, I just faithfully attack his enemies and repeat his propaganda. Why are you lying and calling me a trump supporter wahhhh!"

Then why do the democrats pick someone to beat him?

#59 | Posted by goatman

Ok cool nostradamus. You let us know who is guaranteed to beat him.

Just as you will vote for whatever democrat gets put up, even if it was Hillary again.,

What is your point? That I am like you and will automatically reject one candidate?

#56 | Posted by goatman

How is that anything like me? I always vote for the lesser evil. And nearly any human alive is a lesser evil than trump.

You'll vote for trump and blame the democrats for not finding the perfect candidate for you, because your corrupt brain can't tell the difference between imperfect and totally evil.

Similar to the Civil War-- there will be a period of reconstruction.
#52 | Posted by pumpkinhead

We are STILL suffering the fallout of the civil war. The losing side still hasn't admitted defeat and thinks this is just halftime.

All the more reason for the democrats to put up someone other than a corrupt, corporate owned, lying loser like they did last time. How embarrassing it is to the Democratic part to be beaten by an arrogant ------- like Trump.

#53 | Posted by goatman

You'll find something unaccceptable about whoever they nominate unless they literally nominate a republican.

She wouldn't have killed the eminently killable Republican party and we would have had to contend with it's nonsense for countless future election cycles, but Trump has a chance to do that very thing within a brief, 4 year period. Superior indeed...

#50 | Posted by pumpkinhead

Thats the price you're willing to pay for all the damage trump is causing? The results of trump's horrible policies and poisonous lies will be felt for decades and longer.

The republican party was horrible before trump and it will remain horrible after him. They'll just play "trump who? we never really supported him. hillary made us do it" same as you are.

Why bother? You guys have already posted the juicy parts, ad nauseum.

#10 | Posted by nullifidian

Maybe we can stop posting it when your cult stops making factually inaccurate statements about it. Are you ready to do that yet?

#7 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY AT 2019-08-14 12:44 PM | FLAG: Paranoid fantasies like russia, Russia, RUSSIA!

#8 | Posted by MSgt

The only paranoid fantasy is that russia DIDNT attack our election and trump DIDNT accept their help and DIDNT obstruct justice to hide it.

Learn to read, then read the mueller report.

Hillary was the worst choice the Dems could have made back in '16. I knew this beforehand and I knew it afterwards, and I am only an immobile, mostly hollow vegetable with a bunch of seeds for brains. How come everyone else couldn't have figured this out?

#47 | Posted by pumpkinhead

I'm with you a 1000%. But if you can't see that she was still vastly superior to trump in nearly every way then you are still a mostly hollow vegetable with a bunch of seeds for brains.

Pretty similar. At least you can't catch AIDS from a sneeze.

#45 | Posted by pumpkinhead

So if you had to have one of them, you wouldn't have a preference as to which one? Would you let someone else pick for you?

Hillary was a Republican? Who knew? She allowed the sale of 20% of US uranium to Russia.

#6 | Posted by goatman a

So what? Did she attack the concept of knowable truth and facts? Did she fill half the countries heads with paranoid fantasies and try to start a race war for personal benefit? Did she say she trusts putin above the conclusions of the US military?

PS that talking point has been debunked a thousand times. You keep using it because you can't defend trump, so you do what your cult leader does and just attack clinton instead.

"WHATABOUT HILLARYYYYY!"

You sure are a tough guy, Fredo.

#44 | Posted by nullifidian

I could be a paraplegic in a wheelchair and still be able to call out idiocy and evil where I see it.

Anything else to offer?

Fox news has done far more damage to this country than any terrorist group in history.

Putin was smart to recognize that america's achilles heel was the stupidity of the republican base. He didn't need a bigger military to bring us down, he just needed to convince right wing morons to do it for him.

Next thing you know he'll tell a black audience, "Democrats want to see y'all back in chains."

Then, he'll brag about carrying hot sauce in his pocket.

After that, he'll go to a gun store in Ohio and ask, "Can I get me here a huntin' license?"

#17 | Posted by JeffJ

WHATABOUT THE DEMOCRATS!

They're just as racist as the most racist president in modern history right guys? If not, just shove a chopstick into your ear and stir until dems seem just as bad as trump!

The lesser of two evils.

The people will choose to elect a demon or a devil.

Is there really a difference.

#38 | Posted by Petrous

What a stupid question. "Is there a difference between BAD and WORSE?"

Let me ask you this. Is there a difference between a flu and AIDS, or do you have no preference between which you'd rather get because they're both diseases?

1) I wasn't whining 2) I said nothing about being called evil.

You are so pathological, you don't even remember your own lies, do you? So sad. It seriously is, man (it is, "man", isn't it, in spite of what you claimed a few years ago?)

#42 | Posted by goatman

Yes you were, and you are included in the evil that enables trump.

I must say, I didn't miss you while you were gone.

You have exactly 2 tricks: TO QUOQUE responses- pretending there is no difference between IMPERFECT and TERRIBLE- and then tying yourself in to knots with semantics games to avoid the larger issue.

Nothing has changed in years. Carry on. I'll keep calling you out.

Regardless wht you think of nuance, it's better than relying on lying as you clearly do

#35 | Posted by goatman

I dont need to lie. I dont support a side with nothing to offer except to polluters, racists, and billionaires.
Facts are on my side.

[This is the part where you say something about how democrats aren't perfect either because that's all you can do.]

I'm not impressed by any of them. They are all corporate owned except Bernie and he's way too far left for my taste.

#26 | Posted by goatman

So moderate democrats are ruled out because they're corporate owned, and liberal democrats are ruled out because they're not too far left - aka not corporate owned enough. Hilarious.

I guess you wont be voting for any republicans that take corporate money either then will you?

For a hyperpartisan to screech about something their own party is guilty of is hypocrisy.

#23 | Posted by goatman

You're so addicted to to quoque arguments that it's the only kind you can make.
"if you're not perfect, you can't say the other side is horrible"

Tattoo this backwards on your forehead so you can read it in the mirror:
TYRANNY IS THE DELIBERATE REMOVAL OF NUANCE.

Yes, I did say that, Ms. Deflection. What does that have to do with your lie I called you out on?

#40 | Posted by goatman

What lie? YOu're included in that group.

No, I wasn't. Why do you lie so much especially when you can so easily be disproven with this thing called the PGUP key. Assigning false positions is also a logical fallacy. Learn this.

#38 | Posted by goatman

So use your PGUP key. You said I have to IMAGINE evil republicans. No imagination required.

I wasn't. I was stating that you see evil republicans every where you look and imagine them where you don't. My post had nothing to do with actions having consequences. Reading and reading comprehension are fundamental.

#36 | Posted by goatman

You're whining about being called evil. The way to fix that is to stop being evil, not to whine that it's not fair that evil people who do evil things are called evil all the time.

So, why do they like Trump?

#14 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK "

Because he's not Hillary

#15 | Posted by goatman

So why will they vote for him again when hillary isn't on the ticket?

My point (which you deflected from, of course) stands. Democrats are also guilty of selective morality.

Again, reading, and reading comprehension are fundamental. Learn this.

#17 | Posted by goatman

Everyone on earth is guilty of selective morality.

Severity matters. Repubs whole argument for voting for them was they were going to be the family values party and the fiscally responsible party. Those are now both out the window. Repubs' only remaining defense is "well dems aren't perfect so they can't complain about repubs being horrible. A 90% evil party is exactly the same as a 20% evil party because they're both not perfect."

"Tu quoque" debating again goatman. Just like your stupid "if you use oil you can't say we should use less oil" argument.

You just failed 6th grade debate class again.