"Wahhh stop saying CULT! YOURE the cult! wahhhhh!"

You all are broken people ....

#6 | Posted by oneironaut a

A fascist is calling his opponents terrorists, which implies they should be killed or prosecuted, and you take the fascist side?

And then cry when we lump you in with fascists.

" For years conservatives were lectured and scolded about separation of church and state but now your Christianity is a major part of your campaign.... Can you explain that ?

---I can ... He's a woke DSA admiring Dem which always adds up to.... 2 faced effing lying despicable piece of filth...

#33 | Posted by shrimptacodan

Find a quote or policy of his where he implies his religion should be imposed on anyone else.

Flag:

Neither party wants to live within a balanced budget. All you have to do is look at the voting records on spending.

#15 | Posted by lfthndthrds

If you actually looked at those records you'd see which party is way worse. And which president is responsible for creating over a quarter of the debt in under 6 years.

Danforth will CONSTANTLY deflect. Constantly.

#111 | Posted by BellRinger

The entire biden/pence classified docs investigation was a deflection from the trump classified documents theft.

Posts from his site has been banned for this site since over 10 years ago, ------.

#13 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Yup because he's a moron. Yet even he is smart enough to stop following trump at some point.

You're not.

^ This ------- lunatic now cares about what Alex Jones has to say..

#10 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Yeah because EVEN ALEX JONES isn't stupid enough to still support trump.

But you are.

And don't effing lie about that's far left because Dems have called to defund police... Open border.... Amnesty .. take over corporations for years ...

And you simpletons kept telling us djt was was going to end democracy...

....2 faced liars.

#12 | Posted by shrimptacodan

I don't know what Trump had, and I didn't hear him on a recording sharing it with a civilian who shouldn't have the information. Furthermore, Trump was an elected President, Biden - not so much - at the time of him taking the documents.

#100 | Posted by lfthndthrds

And you never will because trump killed the investigation. Just like an innocent guy would right?

But you know what trump DID - he lied about not having documents, refused to give them back, and got other people to engage in a cover up. Did biden do any of those things?

Just say it out loud. He broke the law and no one is going to do anything about it... And the first reason we were given is because of dementia - while he was still President.

I personally don't care if they do anything to punish him or not. But no amount of -------- leaking out of you is going to change what actually happened.

#97 | Posted by lfthndthrds

What actually happened is he immediately returned the documents upon discovery.

What actually happened with trump? Is your cult even allowed to say it out loud?

You're talking about a misdemeanor traffic stop. This conversation above could potentially involve treason, raetard.

#92 | Posted by lfthndthrds

I'm talking about how law enforcement treats suspects differently based on their behavior.

And you are desperate to find a semantic fig leaf to cover your cult leader's microscopic --------. Happy to spend another day looking like a fool for a con man as he drives your country into the ditch.

That pertains to sentencing, dumbass.. Charges are something entirely different.

#89 | Posted by lfthndthrds

It pertains to who the police even go after dumbass.

If you want to try it out, go drive 80mph til you get pulled over. Then hand over your license and registration and see what happens.

After you are let go, drive 80mph again until you get pulled over. This time, take off on a high speed chase until the police have to pop your tires, and see if you're treated any differently.

Can you show me - in the actual law - where it says, "no charges will be filed against people who take classified information and give it back when asked"?

#85 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Can you show me - in legal history - a case where the defendent's response to law enforcement wasn't considered in the way law enforcement handled their case?

It goes to INTENT.

Here ya go dumdum

"The legal concept you are describing is known as prosecutorial discretion.

While law enforcement officers exercise police discretion when deciding whom to stop, arrest, or investigate, the overall aggressiveness of the legal response"including what charges to file, whether to offer a favorable plea deal, or how hard to pursue maximum penalties"rests under prosecutorial discretion.

When prosecutors and law enforcement evaluate how to exercise this discretion based on the defendant's actions, they look at specific aggravating and mitigating factors:
Factors Influencing Prosecutorial Discretion

Aggravating Circumstances (Hiding the Crime): If a defendant actively conceals evidence, flees the jurisdiction, intimidates witnesses, or lies to investigators, law enforcement and prosecutors treat this as evidence of consciousness of guilt. These actions demonstrate a lack of remorse and often lead to elevated charges (e.g., adding obstruction of justice or tampering with evidence), higher bail requests, and a refusal to negotiate plea deals.

Mitigating Circumstances (Immediate Cooperation): If a defendant immediately surrenders, confesses, or provides substantial assistance (helping law enforcement investigate or prosecute others), prosecutors often exercise their discretion favorably. This can result in reduced charges, diversion programs, or lighter sentencing recommendations under established cooperation agreements.

Related Legal Concepts

Acceptance of Responsibility: In many judicial systems (including U.S. federal sentencing guidelines), demonstrating true contrition and cooperating early leads to a formal reduction in the recommended sentence severity.

Proactive vs. Reactive Enforcement: Law enforcement agencies use their discretionary authority to allocate investigative resources toward defendants who show high culpability or ongoing criminal effort, while scaling back aggressive tactics for low-risk, fully cooperative individuals."

Sorry, but Trump doesn't get to establish today's standards of anything.

He can scream what he wants.

#3 | Posted by eberly

He screams it. Fascist media repeats it. Over and over until it becomes reality for the tens of millions of deluded cult members who swallow every drop of piss he gives them.

So I guess you're right. Trump doesn't establish the standards. The fascist oligarchs who spread his lies do that.

You are doing exactly what you are falsely accusing me of doing. And you are deflecting to Trump on a thread about Biden. What's disappointing is I know you are capable of being reasonable. I've witnessed it on occasion. Taking this tack makes no sense.

#79 | Posted by BellRinger

Any thread about classified documents charges automatically involves trump. The whole reason the cult wants biden charged is because their cult leader was charged.

To pretend biden's situation existed in isolation only makes you look dumber.

Translation: Still can't explain why Biden wasn't charged.

#50 | Posted by lfthndthrds

It's been explained to you dozens of times. Biden returned the documents upon discovery.

Trump launched a massive coverup.

How is that difficult for you to understand?

I think taxpayers are more concerned with their grand children owing 36+ Trillion dollars. Collections and AR doesn't make a dent in this any more as the servicing of the debt alone is the largest line item in the government today.

#11 | Posted by oneironaut

Yet here you are every day defending the con man who added over a quarter of that debt in under 6 years.

So obviously you don't really care.

If debt was your concern you'd support the party that has a proven record of being better for it.

Talarico could beat paxton by 30 points, but it will be paxton who heads to DC next year.

That's how fascists roll.

Blue Wave bye, bye Congres! I expect DJT may then just quit his job and go to Israel where they love him... and won't extradite him for all the crimes he will be convicted of in absentia.

#1 | Posted by Corky

Why would a democrat congress have any power against a king?

What can they actually do to him? NOTHING.

I'm old enough to remember when liberals loved Elon.

#46 | Posted by lfthndthrds

I'm old enough to remember when republicans hated him.

The fascinating thing is, elon becoming a nazi and killing innocent people made liberals hate him, while it made republicans love and defend him.

Your whole party is filled with psychopaths, so of course you worship the most successful ones.

Biden only returned the documents WHEN HE GOT CAUGHT. On the tape in 2017 he admits to giving classified documents to his ghost writer who had ZERO clearance.

Lefties apparently have zero problem with this. Zero. Because it's (D)ifferent, somehow. As for Trump, he deserves everything he gets for retaining classified documents.

#35 | Posted by BellRinger

And what did trump do when he got caught?

The cops treat you differently when they pull you over for speeding, based on whether you hand over your license and registration or decided to take off on a high speed chase.

Is that unfair?

LMAO another raetard

#22 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Why did trump do this:

"One of Donald Trump's employees told FBI agents the former president ordered boxes of documents at Mar-a-Lago to be moved before federal agents searched the property, according to a source familiar with the matter.

The source also told NBC News that the FBI obtained security video showing people moving boxes out of a storage room at Trump's Florida estate."

Speak,

Also...reread what I wrote.

Do you see me using the word "support"?

Read what I write and not what you think I mean.

#256 | Posted by BillJohnson a

A vote is support dumbdumb.