Are you claiming you've never taken more than you needed, never spread something false, or acted without empathy?
Because unless you're the one perfect person walking the earth, your argument lacks both credibility and self-awareness.
And unless you're a Christian (I suspect you've never accepted that label for yourself) then that last bit of finger-pointing isn't even yours to make.
Actually, there's a Catch 22 with Christians. We're all hypocrites. It comes with the territory. We all fall short of the higher ground we look up to.
So I ask...are you holding people to a standard you don't follow and judging them as you go?
#111 | Posted by BillJohnson
No I'm arguing that the worst offenders should go first. Of which I am nowhere near the top.
The TU QUOQUE argument you're using is a favorite of fascists, who love to argue "well the other side isn't PERFECT so they are in no position to criticize us (even though we're far worse)"
I don't go to church but I'm a better christian than you and every other moron who went and voted for the antichrist to be presidnt.
Remember how the media lied that protesting this criminals death wouldn't spread COVID but protesting the COVID lockdowns themselves would spread COVID?
#46 | Posted by THEBULL
I don't remember that. I remember the media listing out a list of gatherings by risk level where outdoor events were accurately rated as less risky than indoor events.