Oh, so now you are going to pretend the conversation never happened. How convenient.

Soooo I'm guessing that means no link.

It is funny how epically wrong you've been for 2 years that you feel the need to resort to straw men in order to avoid having to own up.

#77 | Posted by JeffJ

It's funny how easily you've tossed the facade of impartiality and interest in truth.

Because here's a simplified version of what you and the other cultists are doing.

For two years, we heard endlessly how the sky is green.

And that this investigation was surely going to prove how the sky is the greenest of greens.

Then the report comes out and says, no the sky isn't green. It's blue but sometimes has shades of red.

You tools are now running around going "ahhaaaaa we told you the sky was red! It's probably green too as surely the next investigation will prove!"

It's goal post moving on an epic scale with a healthy dose of faux indignity thrown in because we refuse to go along with your historical revisions.

It has already been proven that Page was spied on

Lies.

The question now is whether those errors were due to incompetence or politics. Too many errors to be incompetence.

#17 | Posted by fishpaw

The question now is how much more do you have to lie to make your lies true in your own schitheap mind?

Don't just say he is unfit because he has proved you and the other shills wrong for the past three years.

#28 | Posted by fishpaw

Will you die if you stop lying?

Just trying to figure out the genesis of being such a dishonest schitheap...

Odd how quiet this thread is while the threads about Trump's personal appeaser, Bill Barr, are teeming with righties.

Funny how this isnt the argument for those immigration sanctuary cities.

#2 | Posted by boaz

Yeah it's gotten bad how towns/states are apparently just declaring which laws they'll follow and which ones they won't.

Not a good trend.

A few months ago I mentioned Bruce Ohr acting's as a conduit between Steele and the FBI and you went -------. You are in no position to call anyone a partisan stooge.

LOL link?

Also quit taking statements made by rabid right wingers and trying to attribute them to me. Hannity doesn't speak for me.

#72 | Posted by JeffJ

FF!

Don't watch the debates. The Republicans are lying their rear ends off.

I caught a little bit of the audio yesterday morning (IIRC) that was absurd.

It went something like:

GOP Congressman (GC): Are you willing to answer this question, on the record?

Guy testifying (GT): Yes, I will answe....*cut off*

GC: REMEMBER YOU ARE UNDER OATH SIR! ARE YOU WILLING TO ANSWER MY QUESTION UNDER OATH SIR?!?!

GT: Yes, if you'll allow me to...*cut off*

GC:THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WANT YOU TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION SIR! WILL YOU DARE ANSWER THIS QUESTION! UNDER OATH!?!?!

GT: Uhhhh absolutely, you see..*cut off*

GC: DO YOU DARE ANSWER MY QUESTION!!!!!!!

I had to shut it off. It was beyond absurd.

Perhaps someday you will get through your thick skull is that what was weaponized was the ------- FISA court

Facts not in evidence, moron.

You know, maybe if you idiots actually read the reports

#69 | Posted by Ben_Berkkake

LOL this from a sycophantic cultist regurgitating talking points.

Or have you actually read all 476 pages?

#9 you lost your mind anytime anyone said that the Steele dossier was central to the Page FISA warrants and that FISC was mislead about the origins of the dossier.

You were 100% wrong.

#18 | Posted by JeffJ

If I did this so frequently, it should be easy to find an example.

What's more likely is you'll find the actual history, not your revised version of it, which is that Trump and his cultists claimed the FISA applications were based on the dossier and that the source of the dossier wasn't presented to the judge (ie it was hidden that it was political dirt digging).

None of which was true then nor is it true now no matter how much you try to revise history.

It must have hurt to type that.

Not at all. I'm quite capable and willing to accept reality for what it is.

I've never made that claim. After yesterday and coupled with Durham's brief remark on Monday I'm finally open to the idea that it might be a possibility.

#20 | Posted by JeffJ

Doesn't matter. THAT has been the narrative for the past two years. THE narrative that was supposedly going to be devastatingly confirmed by Horowitz's report.

What funny is that after the report comes out completely debunking it, you're claiming you're convinced that that is the truth!

Unf---ing believable. It would be funny if it wasn't so stupid.

You've been 100% wrong about the FISA warrants for 2 years.

Only in your distorted new version of what we've all been participating in the past 2 years.

After what Horowitz uncovered it is absolutely appropriate to dig deeper into how the investigation even started in the first place.

LOL did Mackris take over your account?

Don't address me again until he's lost control. I'm tired of yet another brazen, characterless liar showing their face.

That testimony was absolutely devastating and it shattered a narrative that you've been desperately clinging to for 2 years - that there was nothing wrong with the Page FISA applications

That's a gross mischaracterization of the entire thing.

If you have a poor memory, please tell me so I don't take this as intentional misrepresentation, which is what it's looking like.

The "narrative" has been that the investigation wasn't based solely on the Steele dossier and that it wasn't partisan actions by "deep state" members trying to oust Trump for personal reasons.

Period. Full stop. THAT was the narrative of the last two years no matter how desperately you try to retroactively fit the report onto the past.

Well, now it has been vindicated. I know it's something your over-sized ego makes very difficult for you but you need to take the medicine.

#59 | Posted by JeffJ

LOL how hard are you squinting at the report to come to this conclusion?

And you keep acting as if I'm denying the findings. I haven't nor will I. The findings are the findings.

But none of it supports the assertions from the right about partisanship witch hunts with no legal basis, no matter how much you ignore that primary finding.

Do you want to see evidence of a weaponized DOJ: Read the Horowitz report, and more importantly, watch/listen to his testimony.

You are literally stating the antithesis of the report's conclusions as fact.

LOL, you were claiming that you were unsettled about a weaponized DOJ and I pointed out that Holder did the same thing and it didn't bother you in the slightest.

Followed by:

Your assigning positions to others game

I don't recall ever discussing the Holder issue. Hell, I don't even recall the issues you're claiming are on par with Barr's conduct.

Which, BTW, is the topic of this thread.

So either address the topic at hand or STFU.

it's quite clearly a political bias to the point of being a criminal conspiracy.

When reality doesn't meet your expectations, simply make it up!

You can be honest now Jeff, you're that sour puss wearing old white guy walking around in a MAGA hat just waiting for somebody to say something to you, aren't you?

Bill Barr is an excellent AG.

#2 | Posted by JeffJ

Yup. Zero to Mackris in 2 seconds.

Is it a relief to finally let all the stupid out you've been holding in while trying to appear non-partisan and thoughtful/intelligent?

BTW roc, how did holder go after political enemies with a weaponized DOJ?

Just so it's clear what you're whatabouting about.

I guess we all forgot how unsettled you were when Holder did the exact same thing.

#52 | Posted by Rightocenter

Whatabout whatabout whatabout.

If all you have is this feeble garbage just stay lurking.

Of course it does ... because the law is siding against you.

#50 | Posted by AndreaMackris

No, it's not schitheap.

But your shtick the past several days has been to go full dotard and simply state the opposite of reality like your idol Trump.

All of the other posters on this thread are completely clueless about what is going on.

No, we're not.

We're well aware that we've seen how the sausage is made and that the right's narrative is the big, steaming pile of BS that we knew it to be.

And that the right itself is the big, steaming pile of schit we've known it to be as they shift goal posts to act as if they've been right all along while the report blows every single claim they made out of the water.

The report has proven otherwise and Comey, Brennon and many in the media have either been blatently wrong or have blatently lied for the last three years.

#8 | Posted by fishpaw

When you muster even a peep of criticism of our liar in chief you'll have the credibility to worry about lying.

Until then, GFY schitheap.

This is just an attempt to preemptively discredit the Durham investigation.

#7 | Posted by JeffJ

So a bunch of conservative and libertarian attorneys are just closeted Democrats trying to get ahead of the rigged report?

Jesus Christ you've gone full stupid. Like zero to Mackris in 2.3 seconds.

Just like he was going to let the chips fall where they may...until they did and he latched on to what negative findings there were so as to retroactively change his argument to match the negative findings as if we don't remember the months of posting that occurred prior to the release of the report.

"narrative".

*drink*

I always doubted you'd accurately assess the findings of the report. You've even come out as fully in Barr's corrupt corner.

I don't deny that it points out many systemic problems. What it didn't do was support the conspiracy theories we've been listening to for the last three years about a deep state trying to overturn an election because they're secretly a bunch of democrats.

But you can't even honestly say that that was your narrative for months, if not years.