Then why don't you point it out, Wile E.

#79 | Posted by BellRinger

So stupid then...

Better than sending state LEO to arrest and drag lawmakers back home to force an open legislative session to force a map through with zero voter input.

But sure, both sides, huh?

People have so much free cash floating around they surely won't mind having to buy more gas because cars become less efficient...

STFU idiot.

Gee, I wonder why our economic experts aren't here defending the economic policies they voted for...

#21. The author cites hard numbers. And compares the numbers to other recent presidents. The difference in usage is staggering. And it's more problematic when we look at how many topimes Klain, Rice and Dunn logged in to the pen.

#25 | Posted by BellRinger

They use a different metric for Biden than any of the others cited.

You're either dishonest or too stupid to notice.

#27 no but your answer is so untethered from reality it deserved an unserious response.

All 3 branches of our government are officially constitution hating s^%#.

It's because every time a thread is created that you don't like you lazily attack the source. Every time.

#8 | Posted by BellRinger

When you link to a known grifter and charlatan, you're going to get that response.

Matt Ridley LOL The same tool that pushed for lab origins of COVID the entire pandemic and had to resort to some pretty disingenuous lengths to do so, that Matt Ridley?

No wonder you're always so full of s&^%, ballwasher, you don't know enough about the topics you comment on to know you're being had.

Joseph R. Biden, 2021"2024: more than 1,400 substantive autopen executions, constituting ~60% after July 2022"

You know how I can tell this is dishonest s*&^? They try to sneak in an inflated stat without comparison to any other listed POTUS.

Good news for JPW. His customers won't have to wear comdons anymore. Suck away you effin ----.

#11 | Posted by fortfisher

This dumb pile of s(*& still can't stop thinking about gay sex.

My hemotologist told me they don't use marrow extraction cels now, they grow stem cells from skin cells. I had a marrow extraction, and comented how unpleasant it would have been had they needed a larger extraction.

#8 | Posted by Charliecharles

I knew about induced pluripotent stem cells (ipSCs), I didn't realize they'd gotten into the clinic.

I was also under the impression that they still very much do bone marrow transplants, they just coax the stem cells out of the marrow and into circulation and do a blood draw now instead of shoving a giant needed into the thigh straight into the bone.

I refuse to watch FIFA given how corrupt it seems to be.

IMO, those are very very very small victories.

#14 | Posted by eberly

Yup. It should be viewed as good signs that the environment is ripe for effective change...if the Dems don't f*&^ it up.

This happened before and, as I said, it resulted in the Dems performing better than historical norms but not nearly as well as you would have predicted from all the talk.

I'm sorry you didn't read the entire Rick Wilson article, JPW.

#5 | Posted by A_Friend

It requires me to sign up after about three paragraphs.

So no.

This is why things probably won't improve even after Trump chokes on his Big Mac.

The base is out and comfortable with their status as giant pieces of s*&^ and will continue to elect people willing to shred the constitution and resort to violence on their own level to force their views on the rest of us.

Why does that matter?

In any case, probably not. If it was to treat a hematological cancer it was likely bone marrow transfer, which is why they knew the genotype of CCR5 in the donor.

This again?

Last time there was an imminent "blue wave" it wasn't anywhere near what was expected (while still a pretty heavy loss for the Repubs) and maybe could have been better had there not been such a surety that the outcome was inevitable.

I feel like the Dems fall victim to this constantly.

What's sad is that this is what about 33% of population want.

What does that say about how trashy and immoral they are?

Remember when the idiot righties claimed Putin was afraid of Trump? LOL

Yet more evidence that the right is entirely incompetent when it comes to the economy.

This is, of course, a big problem.

We know that those at the top support Trump in a purely transactional capacity while the idiots in the base genuinely believe.

The only potential saving grace that could set us apart from history is that they may not latch on to a successor as tightly as they have to Trump.

We can only hope.

As for an additional comment on when Trump dies, I still think we'll see story after story of people being arrested for spitting on his corpse if he's laid in state (God I hope he's not honored in that way). Or possibly even worse...

So we're officially at war now?

#83 | Posted by sentinel

No, that's just a phrase that an idiot like Pete would chirp because they realize they're in over their head.

Some of the more salient points stressed were that you don't shoot distressed airmen under parachute, and you don't shoot distressed seaman whose ship has been sunk.

#77 | Posted by madbomber

You do when you're an overcompensating piece of s(*& like Trump or Hegseth.