al gore...2006.......THAT WAS 2006.....TWENTY YEARS AGO...
he's got plenty of energy to spare....because he's a 2 faced lying hypocrite.

#3 | Posted by shrimptacodan

More irrelevant babbling stupidity.

STFU terard. Go back to your Matlock reruns.

#6 | Posted by shrimptacodan

You do realize that none of that incoherent babbling is relevant, right?

F*&^ you're stupid. Just STFU already.

For the Biden voters who want to claim moral high ground.

STFU you childish idiot.

Unfortunately, I got logged out and saw your tripe, dips*&^.

one other thing is clear......you and the rest of your pathetic buds here are obsessed with
talking about pedos...
I read the other day that people who keep calling others pedos are pedos themselves...
#68 | Posted by shrimptacodan

So, you admit Trump is a pedo then? He made the Epstein files a central tenet of his campaign, dumbf*&*. Remember?

Oh, and all the Qanon garbage about pedos, Remember that? Pizzagate ring a bell?

Oh right, the pedo nonsense was all the rage until you realized you've been protecting and supporting the biggest pedo of them all for ten years...f*&^ing idiot.

A symptom of Dunning-Kruger taking over our country.

Because with all due respect, the average person doesn't know enough about anything to state with any confidence whether they trust decisions made by CDC.

One thing is clear from the documents, Epstein really didn't like Trump.

#59 | Posted by visitor_

Another pedo protector weighs in.

And I understand why. You are realizing someone else thinks differently than you do and you have to share this country with them. I know it scares you.
But I dont give a ----.

#28 | Posted by boaz

GFY you f*&^ing idiot.

None of you have EVER spoken on Clinton, with whom there is ALOT more evidence, not one has he been mentioned on here.

Factually untrue on two counts-first, Trump is the most frequent character appearing in Epstein's show. By far. Second, this is probably the hundredth time someone has brought up the Clinton whatabout and every time I've seen it I've seen Dems/Libs say "ok, then charge him like everyone else."

Again, there's no actual, middle of the road conversation to be had here.

Because you're approaching a discussion about a heinous international sex trafficking ring as a 'me vs the libs' argument.

Meanwhile, the rest of us find that repulsive and offensive. So no, we're not going to find a "middle ground" with you that doesn't exist.

For the first time in 20+ years of being on this blog, I'm thinking about truly leaving. It's serving no purpose.

If the breaking point for you was our refusal to use the Epstein files as a run of the mill political squabble, then good riddance. Go to whatever dark s*&^hole you frequent where protecting pedos based on political affiliation is the name of the game and enjoy.

I'm starting to realize there's no real conversation to be had with people on this site.

#19 | Posted by boaz

Probably because you start from a place of such ridiculous opinions people immediately recoil when you speak.

Just a thought...

How does one become such an unthinking, pathetic sack of room temperature s*&^ like Fistedp*&&^?

I really want to try and understand so I'm nicer to his intellectually challenged a&&.

Wow, from The Star?! "appearing" to show the video? Where is the video? Why isn't it linked to the article? You morons believe anything.

#64 | Posted by fishpaw

You stupid f*&^s ignore everything.

You care more about it than I do.

#59 | Posted by boaz

Because you have no standards, morals or values.

I thought my post really well acknowledged it's a dog whistle.
#55 | Posted by BillJohnson

I misread it, then. My apologies.

Not a good look for Trump.
#44 | Posted by boaz

About 90% of what that idiot does is "not a good look for Trump" to any objective, rational human being.

And the 10% that's OK isn't usually on purpose.

Calling this an attempted assassination is absurd. Dude never stood a chance.

Not only because he would have been spotted long before having an opportunity to actually try but because even if he did the SKS (a notoriously minute of man accurate gun) with a scope duck taped on to it probably wasn't going to be able to make an attempted shot anyway.

#15 | Posted by oneironaut

As usual, this dips*&^ likely wife beater shows up to blame the wrong people based on the effect while ignoring the cause.

a sharp observer of Democrats explains how this moment is handing them a major opportunity to seize control of this debate.

Have no fear. Chucky Boy will give a press conference holding two blocks of melting ice as a bad metaphor for what he's *in really angry voice* reaaaallly gonna do to 'em! only to babble like the long past prime, impotent idiot he is, and it will become fodder for the right to gloss over the very real message the Dems just dropped the ball in communicating...again.

I don't even want to know the stuff that could come to light were this administration to end.

It's what makes me most worried about how far they'll take this - they have to be pot committed at this point to maintaining power at all costs in order to remain free men.

It will even now.

To those of us with functional brains.

It's only the brain dead idiots who still support Trump that will be good little lap dogs and repeat the evidence-free claims without question.

Don't start trying to play victim.

Me pointing out that your incessant misuse of a long lame and unfunny comeback isn't playing the victim, sport.

Then what did you say?

#41 | Posted by oneironaut

I was poking fun at the Texas "rancher" pinche mao (but under his latest name) for being a frat douche at Texas Tech. Asked him how many times he woke up the morning after a frat party with a salty taste in his mouth.

That of course morphed into me saying I woke up with a salty taste in my mouth and soon it took on a homoerotic fantasy life of its own for lfthndcuck and ballwasher to express their anonymous gay bathroom sex fantasies.

I'm good with a responsible and secure social safety net. I don't denigrate those who need a hand up when times get tough. But that's not the same as government employees.

#397 | Posted by BellRinger

I don't know why you're explaining that to me.

Explain it to the litany of anti-government people I know who are perfectly fine with government assistance, paychecks and benefits for themselves.

"Public Health Officials" (read: Progressives)

You really are one of the stupidest motherf*&^ers I've ever met. My God you're pathetic.

Just STFU you idiot. Be glad you weren't left on a mountain side after birth and that society supported your dumb a&& into adulthood so you could be a constant leeching, nagging reminder of why that's not always a sound policy.

Everyone knows their lines, everyone knows to be offended, and nothing new gets said.
At this point it feels less shocking and more manipulative.
Everyone falls right in line.

#29 | Posted by BillJohnson

Only a f*&^ing idiot could look at this and discard the racist dog whistle nature of it.