There are a dozen comments above rabidly blaming the GOP for this miscarriage of justice. THAT exemplifies partisan derision. But you ignore those dozen posts and call ME out for my factual and truthful response?

You disappoint me, Et Al, I expected better of you.

#21 | Posted by Miranda7

There's a big difference between passing the laws (despite the people of the state wanting something different) and officers of the court upholding the laws.

See the difference?

Good.

Although, if it forces them to sell current inventory, housing prices are going to plummet. Good for buyers, bad for owners.

"This is not a test," the university wrote. "RUN-HIDE-FIGHT."

And this is acceptable to people like Boaz.

I'm so glad my wife doesn't work in school buildings anymore. I was inches away from getting her a bullet resistant kevlar backing for her bag just in case. Thankfully that's no longer needed.

Please note the lack of stupid insults in my posts. I'm raising the room for you. I'm sure it won't have much effect, but you're welcome.
#81 | POSTED BY HUMANIMAL

Hardly. Funny, though, considering you then say

OK Orwellian apologist.

#84 | POSTED BY HUMANIMAL

LOL what an idiot. Doesn't understand the topic and spews talking point nonsense around books he probably hasn't read to cover for it.

You know what raises the room and doesn't result in snipes? Actually portraying the topic properly.

Delegation of administrative power is a long standing legal function Congress undertakes so long as that delegated power doesn't include legislative power.

Which is why you keep whining that agencies operating under Congressionally delegated powers are supposedly legislating when they're not.

The entire reason this case is getting the attention it is is because if SCOTUS rules in favor of the plaintiff, they'll be ignoring and overturning long, unchallenged precedence based on some new "historical" interpretation.

In limiting Congress's power to delegate, the nondelegation doctrine exists primarily to prevent Congress from ceding its legislative power to other entities not vested with legislative authority under the Constitution.

It's a good thing the agencies aren't legislating, isn't it?

It's a rarity on this site for the very reasons you cited. It's become almost exclusively a team sport. It's about winning, not discussing. It's why so many get incredibly pedantic and attack the messenger is the norm.

#48 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Actually, it's because conversing with righties is like shoveling against a manure tide. Endless waves of ignorance and bulls&^% have to we waded through to occasionally find something worth actually discussing.

You slow -------- constantly change every discussion to be about the poster and refuse to ever discuss the actual aspects of the articles or arguments because people like me come armed with an AR-15 of knowledge and you have nothing but handfuls of ----.

#43 | POSTED BY CLAUDIO

LOL your "AR-15 of knowledge" is about as limp as your d&^%.

The reason people often don't address the "substance" of your argument and instead appear to make it about you by telling you you're wrong is because...you're wrong. Pretty much always.

But, being a typical MAGA moron, you think your half cocked BS opinions are deserving of respect on the same level as actual knowledge.

I believe the salient point to all this is that congress cannot delegate their authority to make laws.
#42 | POSTED BY HUMANIMAL

The salient point is that you're an ignorant moron spewing nonsense you're too lazy to read about first.

As already mentioned, no wonder you went out of business.

Supreme Court is task to check this unconstitutional arrangement.

Multiple cases have ruled on the Constitutionality of delegation of authority.

You're wrong and use words you don't understand.

Now, it's been going on for decades so the legal argument can also be made that fines/injunctions from an agency like the SEC don't fall under due process.

#14 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Except you go before a judge and defend your case just like a trial. How is that not due process?

It has nothing to do with not falling under due process and everything to do with the GOP wanting free reign to be corrupt, untouchable POSes.

Well this thread is clearly antisemitic.

All of these federal agencies are included in the executive branch; in theory they are not authorized to create laws.

#11 | POSTED BY HUMANIMAL

Do you idiots even read anything before spouting off?

These regulatory agencies don't create laws. They're created by Congressional action to, wait for it, enforce regulatory statutes also passed by Congress.

Also, the court is, yet again, overturning long held precedence supported by multiple cases allowing for Congressional delegation of administrative powers. Because, you know, they claim some historical nonsense narrative overrides precedence.

This is a 7th amendment issue.

#7 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

No, it isn't.

I'm so tired of seeing this kind of s&^%. It should be entirely legal to resist in that kind of a situation and any injuries sustained by the cops entirely on them without insurance coverage while they're also responsible for any injuries sustained by the person they abuse.

Why did you get up and walk away when you saw me?

Doesn't matter. That's not a crime or indicative of one.

Why aren't you eating inside?

Who cares. It's not a crime to eat outside.

Dude was looking for a confrontation and to abuse somebody, take out his anger, whatever.

When he attempts to pat him down, Aguilar Mendez resists and a struggle ensues.

Based on the video I saw, this is inaccurate. He grabs the kid aggressively and, not surprisingly, the kid reacted. That was all the cop needed to go full blown d&^%head mode.

While fighting on the ground with the deputies, Aguilar Mendez grabs the taser to try to take it away or stop them.

An entirely reasonable thing. To charge somebody for acting out of self-preservation instinct is haneous.

Sheriff Robert Hardwick said during a news conference the sergeant did everything by the book and that Aguilar Mendez was trespassing. "All the suspect had to do was comply," Hardwick said.

Ahhhh yes another freedumbz loving "c-c-conservative." And FL wonders why normal people think it's a s&^%hole.

Is this the thread where oneirondips&^% pretends to be a librul?

It's probably at least 50% higher than that. No reason for IDF to be truthful.

FDR directly enabled the communists to conquer half the world's population and kill hundreds of millions.

That's odd considering he was dead.

So the headline should be Ohio Woman Faces Felony Charges After Clogging Up Toilet. The current headline is a bit disingenuous.

#9 | POSTED BY SENTINEL

No, it's not. She's being charged because of the end result of the miscarriage.

This is how anybody who miscarries early and at home goes through it. This is absolutely ghoulish on the part of the Ohio GOP and judiciary system.

Didn't Ohio recently vote to legalize abortion?

#3 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK

Yes. But the freedumbz loving "c-c-conservatives" are doing everything they can to roll it back, along with the marijuana legalization.

Anti-Semitism has fractured the Democratic Party.

#2 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

How so, exactly?

And yet, we'll act all shocked when someone attacks the US in the future.

Is it arrogance or stupidity that leads us to foreign policies of violence and death without an expectation of backlash?

light sensitive cells turned into light sensing ones doctor banjo.

#251 | POSTED BY TOR

Yes.

But if you're going to say light, do you mean the visible part of the spectrum? Or cells that sense any part of the EMS?

That John was 6 months older, and his date of birth is known.

Stupid Christians.

June 30. Duh.

How's that wine tasting now?

#243 | POSTED BY TOR

Wine? In a PBR can?

Over evolutionary time, these light-sensitive cells

You're reaching.

The determinant was light sensing.

If you want brownie points for it being a cell exposed on the surface of the animal, well, here's your gold star sticker.