I agree with you, but you morons had no problem with them holding Daine Feinstein's hand while she voted, then died 12 hours later.

#7 | Posted by lfthndthrds

I seem to recall many here holding the position that she should have vacated her seat.

Myself included.

Already exists in the Democrat party

Nothing says you're a lying sack of s*&^ more so than your subconscious use of right wing noise machine talking points like "democrat party."

I call --------

#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Of course, you do. You're a dumbf*&^.

Then they wouldn't have voted for Trump.

Nonsense. Their stupidity was believing he would give them such things.

The bigotry and racism were just the passwords getting him in the door.

A racist/bigot like them who would make them feel wealth and status?!?! Of course, they were attracted to it.

Their stupidity was not recognizing that it was too good to be true, especially coming from a lifelong conman and grifter like Trump.

this was really my only point. that mistake was made when they put her on the ticket. "dark-skinned female" was a good thing.......until it wasn't....

#11 | Posted by eberly

She never made any sense as a VPOTUS. Already a failed candidate in the primaries and from one of if not the bluest state in the country.

Danforth has mentioned that she was nominated to secure the black women vote because, supposedly, it was the keystone demographic to a win for Biden.

But that only shores up the short term thinking knowing VPOTUS would be the obvious choice the next election. The over emphasis on her multiple social justice statuses was what probably made them arrogant enough to install her as candidate in 2024 while also assuming it was a lock.

Exactly what were the mistakes?

#9 | Posted by eberly

Running a poorly supported candidate based on social justice issues because the myopic thinking was that you could get the first BIPOCLSKJDFLKJA:LSKJDA POTUS forced through because Trump couldn't possibly win...

Influential niche coastals refuse to acknowledge that although Dem policies poll well, the accompanying social wedge issues do not and people care more about feeding and housing their families than electing a POTUS based on race/gender/sex/age/disability/[insert other minority status here].

Running a dark-skinned person who was also female?

#10 | Posted by Zed

Whether you intended to or not, you're exemplifying the very mistakes that will hand 2028 to the GOP.

Been seeing more about so called blue dot farmers/ranchers.

I'm all for it. Let the idiots who voted for this disaster bear as much of the consequences as possible. Spare the people who weren't stupid enough to fall for it.

This idiot and those like him will only learn when they suffer real consequences of their actions.

They were sold by someone high up in the administration.

These people have zero loyalty to anything but themselves.

With any luck, there will be investigations and convictions for all of it, this likely espionage for sure.

And all the constant attention on China? As is the norm with these s*&^bags, they were tipping their cards. All of them are in on making money with China behind closed doors.

I'm not sure if it was AI or not, but the video I saw looked like they secured him to a wheel chair, taped his eyes open and taped his mouth into a smile.

He looked like a vegetable. the GOP is grotesque.

I couldn't care less what this POS is doing.

He's a huge HUGE reason our politics are what they are. He was one of the biggest influences that pushed politics from a 'we see this differently but have similar goals' to 'zero sum, go low to destroy anyone and everyone in the way of our donor's wishes.'

Can someone just lock that decrepit piece of s*^% in a closet already?

If she runs and gets support, that will be a clear sign the Dems aren't learning from their mistakes at all and aren't serious people.

So what retread is this idiot?

Cassidy can go f*&^ himself.

He went along with this garbage.

I have a few options there, but you're not gonna like any of them ... ..

For fun, list them.

This is my argument to Lumpers against mail-in ballots.

#17 | Posted by oneironaut

Duhhh LuMpErZ!!

There's zero evidence mail in ballots are a problem. None.

Nor is there any evidence that they're a problem waiting to happen.

There is a remedy for this......it's called elections.

Says our resident "risk manager."

Do you have the slightest understanding of reality?

Careful.

The "p-p-p-p-progressive" will be around shortly to accuse anyone in this thread of all sorts of -ics, -isms and -ists.

"Real median household income increased 2.6% to $87,460 in 2025, the highest level in a Census series dating back to 1967."

I'm sure there is plenty of bad news......LOL

#6 | Posted by eberly

What was inflation in that same time frame?

And you wonder why I doubt you're very good at assessing "risk" and seem to be the type who'd have to get hit by the car before responding to it...

xMazda CX50s are nice. We looked at the CX30 when got the Subaru.

#52 | Posted by visitor_

Can't go wrong with either.

We had a CX30. Nice sporty little crossover.

My wife was sitting in ours at a left turn lane waiting for a green arrow when someone having a "diabetic incident" smashed straight into her at full speed, which was, assuming they were traveling at speed limit, 40 mph.

Car performed impeccably. You could practically trace the energy dissipation through the car from the collapsed fender/hatchback to the buckled rear seat to the absolutely destroyed under-workings of the driver seat (which dropped about 2") to the distorted frame at the front of the driver's side door that wouldn't allow the door to close again after it was opened.

She walked away from it with nothing but a few nights of extra strength Tylenol for the soreness.

The performance in that wreck was why we bought the CX50.

And we've had several Subarus. We had a genuine hard time selling the one we had when we left, it just didn't make economic sense to ship it.

#26 | Posted by lfthndthrds

LOL thanks for proving my point, dips*&^.

You're too f*&^ing stupid to know you just stepped on the rake.

One fraudulent vote every other year IS NOT AN ASSAULT ON ELECTION SAFETY. And it's certainly NOT worth disenfranchising 1000x the legal voters.

#90 | POSTED BY DANFORTH

It is worth that when you're unAmerican s*^% like bill whose ulterior motives are to skew elections (or be ok with them being skewed) so long as his side "wins."

Sure...it already happens, but that doesn't mean its sufficient.

#85 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Considering you can count on two hands the number of instances per election where an illegal is voting, yeah, it's quite sufficient.

You're an idiot, bill, trying desperately to make your unAmerican, anti-democracy views sound reasonable.

JPW drives a 20 year old Miata.

#39 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

Mazda CX50 hybrid when I had a car.

Now I bike everywhere and am looking into a motorcycle.