So when are the righties going to take issue with the federal government forcing its way into local matters in such heavy handed, authoritarian ways?

I would have thought, based on y'all's past statements, that a POTUS unilaterally making changes at a local level by decree would have been a big no no...

Given the current demographics, what Trump did was a historic landslide.

More cherry picking, fact free bulls^*% from this stupid mitherf^*%er.

he goes on a historic landslide victory just 4 years later.

Historic?

Hysterical.

Look up Reagan, 1984.

That's historic.

#10 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK

Look up any election in the last 40 years except W or Trump.

Only a stupid s^*%bag like that a%^hole would call it historic or a landslide.

JPW can't be bothered with caring about women whose lives don't affect him.

Prioritizing other issues over abortion means I don't care about women.

Huh.

News to me.

He regularly speaks out against liberal policies.
#35 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK

I typically have a more tempered view and am willing to walk away when I think something has gone too far.

That doesn't by any means mean I'm all for GOP policy.

It should be. If they can make you carry a rapists baby inside you they can make you do anything.

#27 | Posted by snoofy

It's too myopic for me. There's a broader umbrella of simply leaving people alone if their actions aren't a danger or threat to others. Then again, I'm a rare breed in politics by being a lefty small L libertarian.

Personally, I think the incessant drumbeat over abortion turns a lot of middle voters off who are all about staying out of people's business but find the fervor of the abortion crowd a little ghoulish.

While it's fun discussing your canned talking points about abortion, that was only a tangential mention in the article. The bigger issue is probably mentioned too far down for you to have read it...

While the task force will still be there in name, its credibility"based on both the vigorous vetting process of its members and the detailed, rigorous review of evidence that takes years to complete"will be shot. As with ACIP, the new members are unlikely to go through any real selection process, and as with the recent ACIP recommendations on vaccines press their own opinions as recommendations against scientific fact.

More worrisome is that these charlatans will now have their thumbs on the scales of what gets paid for by insurers in the United States. Think of someone like RFK Jr. adviser Calley Means, who rails against the "corrupt" US healthcare system while hawking dietary supplements, herbal remedies, and other wellness products on the side. Imagine him or any number of similar people in RFK Jr.'s orbit on the USPSTF. The grift is strong with these people.

While I'm looking forward to my insurance covering Himalayan salt lamps, resonating crystals and all manner of unregulated ground up [insert dubious plant here], I prefer real medicine and real experts making these decisions.

When Democrats had a chance to do what they knew they needed to do to protect abortion, they did nothing, and you kept voting for them.

a. They're better than your s*&^bag team.
b. Abortion isn't that high on my list of priorities.

You have nothing but spoon-fed assumptions of what "democrats" believe or should believe.

It's a bargaining chip and always has been "oh look, they're going to take away abortion if we don't win the house, senate" or what ever federal election is coming up.

You'll get no argument out of me.

I hate to break it to you, but you don't have a seat at any table in any room of any debate that requires an IQ over 70.

LOL

#8 | Posted by lfthndthrds

I hate to break it to you, but you don't have a seat at any table in any room of any debate that requires morality.

Can the constitutional scholar please point to the part of the constitution that guarantees anyone a right to abortion?

#2 | Posted by lfthndthrds

No, but I can point to the part where you're a stupid f(*& who thinks things have to be explicitly mentioned.

Because otherwise, none of what we say here would be covered under the first amendment. Bans on gun parts/upgrades wouldn't hold up because they're not explicitly mentioned in the 2A.

In any case, that's not the point of the thread, dumbs*&^.

Putting a bunch of grifting "wellness" folks in charge of determining what insurers have to cover ... what could possibly go wrong?

Testimony is always leaked when the deep state wants it to be. Not that Democrats need evidence to make an accusation.

#10 | Posted by visitor_

Duhhhhhh DeEp StAtEz!!!

What a ---- idiot.

Your potato-brained, pedo was president from 2021 to 2024 and did nothing with this 'data' - which suggests it does not exist or they would have used it.

#57 | Posted by ScottS

Or, more likely, you're such a stupid pile of s*&^ that you're unaware of how unusual Trump's forced involvement with DoJ is.

You Democrats are dumber than a bucket of pig ----.

#51 | Posted by ScottS

Says the stupid pile of s(*& who's argument boils down to 'everyone isn't as big a corrupt piece of s*&^ as myself or Trump, so it can't be true!'

Oh and I think this story breaking in the WSJ again is the early moves in the plan to depose Trump.

They were able to use him to get the foundation laid and now the fall guy is going down since the constant chaos and bulls^%# isn't needed for cover anymore.

So, they're gonna use the very outlets and stories that brought maga to power to destroy it.

#37 talk about delusional.

MAGA is a mental disorder.

So you're the scholar for pointing out the obvious? And your argument is that since your party passed the Patriot act, we shouldn't worry about the obliteration of multiple rights under your currently elected potus?

The Biden administration and DOJ were bound by federal grand jury secrecy laws and court precedents, which prohibit them from releasing the Epstein files unless a judge specifically orders their disclosure through an established legal process.

These pieces of s%^* project their own lack of character, integrity, principles, morals ect onto everyone else around them.

Odd that when Democrats had to power to release the documents it was crickets. Now that Biden's auto-pen stooges had time to obliterate all chain of custody of the documents, these claims are being made. Given all of the false charges leveled against Trump over the last 12 years if there was anything incriminating it would have been leaked by now. So yawn.

#20 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

You. Are. A. Piece. Of. F^*+ing. S*^%.

Yawn.

#17 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

And just like that, sex trafficking children isn't a big deal.

You're a piece of s^*+.

This doesn't really mean anything.

#2 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

And just like that, this isn't really that big of a deal.

You're such a piece of s*^%.

The good news just keeps on coming.

#1 | POSTED BY BOAZ

Don't lie. You posted this based off of nothing more than Trump's bombastic blathering, didn't you?

True traitorous behavior was effectively opening our borders to millions with minimal to no vetting.

#152 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Hey dips*^%, didn't you just say WeRdZ HaF MeAnInGzz?

The basic premise that people like Laura believe, that Trump had Putin elect him so Trump could build a hotel in Moscow and in exchange Trump would let Putin run this country, is so retarded that debating them is useless.

#154 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

The only one who is terarded is the moron who said this with a straight face.

You should be angry with the liars.

#145 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

You mean like Tulsi Gabbard saying the released documents prove Obama manufactured intelligence to go after Trump?

Bell idiot is running with the Gabbard nonsense as true.

Even though it was explained quite clearly why it's 100% bulls^%#.

Gutes Deutsch will go down with this ship.