Did nobody read the actual article?

The one that doesn't contain a single quote from an epidemiologist from Brown?

#6 this f*^%ing idiot responds to news that 70 million kids being auto enrolled in Trump accounts is nothing more than a scam to derisk stock holdings with a fake, never gonna happen false equivalency of Trump doing something that actually benefits the person receiving it.

Hey, dumbf*^%, the point is that even kids are fair game to these pieces of s*%%.

And you love it anyway.

Yet get upset when people treat you like the moronic piece of stupid s*^% you are ...

#10. My other options were dementia-addled Biden and moron word-salad Harris.
If Dems nominate a decent candidate, like Josh Shapiro, I'd strongly consider voting for them.

#11 | Posted by BellRinger

You would have been an idiot making this statement then.

You're an even bigger idiot making that statement now.

Wasn't he trying to stop the USPS from delivering ballots?

#6 | Posted by REDIAL

Certain ballots, I'm sure. I get the feeling mailed ballot issues will be largely from high Dem areas while ballots from Repub areas will arrive smoothly and without issue.

Again, have you looked at the DSA platform?
Heck, knowing you I'd wager you fully support it.

#81 | Posted by BellRinger

LOL You're such an idiot you don't even know how big of an idiot you are.

69% of 23 races were "won" by them, some of them being initiatives, not candidates.

Go outside and breath some fresh air, moron. Stop being a hyperventilating cooze simply because they tell you to be.

I didn't vote for Trump in 2016, Alexandrite. I voted 3rd party

#4 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

So you were stipid enough to vote for him in 2020 and 2024?

The seeds of the collapse were sown.

#2 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

You are quite literally the stupidest motherf*^%er I've ever interacted with.

Were it not for having read a ton of your drivel I would have thought maybe just brilliant satire, but alas, I know you're serious.

or a DSA member?

Duhhhhhhh DsA!!!

There's hasn't been a boogeyman pedoringer has been told to be afraid of that he hasn't soiled his pants on command over.

Pedoringer can't help but demonstrate what an unaware, stupid lump of s*^% he is.

F*^% boomers. They're gonna take take take take take take right up until the bitter end.

The boomer cause in the town I lived in in Missouri was basically since my kids aren't in school anymore, we shouldn't have to pay property taxes to support the schools.'

They take when it benefits them then expect to be allowed to check out when they no longer see a benefit to them.

You look stupider than the person you're calling stupid..

LOL you look "stupider" (what, are you from Jupiter *snicker*...f*&^ing idiot) acting like you scored a point there.

'Wait, you mean 2% of the population only owns 43% of the country's wealth/assets, not 53%? Why the f*&^ did I even grab my pitchfork...'

Just f*&^ off already, idiot. Every single reduction in duplicitous, willfully dishonest people is a need these days.

So what?

Understand more money doesn't mean more even distribution.

Ok. So you don't know what the word assets means...

The more the US prints the greater the inequality the will exist. You can't fix this.

What AI model spit this ----- into existence?

Again you're just greedy, you can't accept your greediness so you call people stupid.

#61 | Posted by oneironaut

LOL right. So greedy I moved to a country with a higher effective tax rate.

I call you stupid because you're stupid. You demonstrate it nearly every post where you click publish.

Onelumpofs*&^ just repeats what it's told.

It's supposedly a Chinese librul living in Canada but can't ever miss a chance to lie/distort/deflect for Trump.

That was for onelumpofs*&^'s #3.

Repeating the same talking points in multiple threads, eh?

Is that what you're paid for in your troll farm?

That's what they called me in high school.

and bitch when this administration closes them.

#13 | Posted by lfthndthrds

You act like this is a budgetary decision or a directed policy.

It's because these inept piles of s*&^ (or corrupt, more likely) are closing bases damaged beyond use.

It's more abandonment than closure.

It's funny how supposed MAGA "patriots" like you still can't bring yourselves to admit just how unAmerican and f*&^ed this administration is.

The Democrats are going to stop all these billionaires from building these data centers, only if we elect them in November and in 2028.

#4 | Posted by lfthndthrds

They can't do anything about it unelected.

I'm doubtful they'll do much as they're beholden to the donor class as well, but there's a better chance with them than the Repubs.

Just more made up fear mongering.

#3 | Posted by oneironaut

More lying bulls*&^ from our resident dishonest s*&^heap.

Ahhhh yes. Duhhhhh BiDeNz!!!

This is all hog wash, there is no "massive" concentration of assets, the money is spread pretty well given the totality of the amount. You're just upset you don't have someone elses stack.

Just say you're greedy.

#49 | Posted by oneironaut

The top 2% or so in the US have about 53% of the total wealth/assets of the US.

I'm not even going to accuse you of being stupid because at this point you're just so constantly, brazenly dishonest it doesn't matter that you're stupid.

The you, lamp, etc, intentionally omit that point, then have to resort to personal insults to the 1 person pointing out there's no money now, is pathetically disingenuous.

You're like some of our resident boomer cucks like msgt or lfthndpedo who point out completely and entirely obvious things then smugly act like they're the smartest person in the room.

It wasn't intentionally omitted.

The only pathetically disingenous thing was your using big numbers hoping others would be equally wowed as you were and, thus, missing the laughable context that was provided.

Whoa, $1 billion dollars!?!?! LOL About 3.6% of revenue and 1.7% of IL tax revenue of THE LAST YEAR ONLY of the entire DECADE you cited.

You're an idiot. Go pick your toenails or something.

#44 | Posted by eberly

You realize that doubling down makes you look twice as stupid, right?

You're oblivious, paying insurance and its distribution of risk is nowhere near the idea of paying for someone else's healthcare (and their "insurance"). No where was anyone paying for someone elses "insurance", except through taxation.

You really are terarded.

You absolutely are paying for other people's medical care when you are part of an insurance plan. Granted, you're paying more for executive compensation and payouts to shareholders even more so, but the entire point of insurance is pooling money to pay for care when needed.

Also, nobody said anyone was paying for other people's "insurance" you f*&^ing idiot.

ER abuse? You make it sound like a good thing.

Anything but you abysmally stupid pile of s*&^.

The idea that I as a tax payer have to pay for illegal immigrants healthcare"insurance" is outrageous, and is absolutely driving people out of California.

#42 | Posted by oneironaut

If only that's what was said.

Again, go tie a bag around your head and leave all that perfectly good oxygen you consume for things like flies and roaches that serve far greater functions to the world than you do.