Aren't they ignoring a court order to start building this?

Illegally building a "ballroom" with unconstitutionally allocated funds...

No, they didn't. They had no intention of doing the job right because that meant less money stolen for insiders.

The level of grift and, likely, outright theft that will become apparent is going to be appalling.

Michelle Obama being a man sure makes Corky's vagina wet.

#7 | Posted by fortfisher

Oh great, this stupid pile of s*&^ is back.

No bid contract indeed.

Well, it was probably a few million dollar job they paid 5-7 times the actual worth that had corners cut to boot.

It's just another money grab. This entire administration is nothing but a giant heist.

They'd have been better off bulldozing the pool and starting over... but then it wouldn't be a gilded age.

#18 | Posted by sitzkrieg

They would have been better off just leaving it alone.

Don't forget, is it bullet proof, does it need to pulled out of a ditch by a regular pickup truck when there's a little bit of snow and have "wade mode."

#4 | Posted by madbomber

I think you're still clinging to any sense of normalcy you can.

I'm willing to bet insiders don't see this as a loss because they negotiated a way for them to make money off of the reconstruction or Iran's control of the straight.

I wouldn't be surprised if it came out eventually that this entire military action was nothing more than using our military as a bargaining chip to force Iran to a table for this exact purpose. As always, whenever these people seem inept or incompetent, it's because we're assuming their intentions and actions are normal and should be interpreted in a normal way.

So...ICE doesn't set policy. They enforce it. They can't tell a judge what said judge can or cannot do.

It's like you intentionally missed the point...

So f*&^ing leave, s*&^heap. Nobody will miss you.

What Bill, Act, President, or Justice at the Federal level have you ever directly voted on or for?

How much direct Democracy does the US Federal system have?

How has Trump changed any of that?

REgarding the topic ... there's little evidence the DoE has done any good.

STFU you stupid piece of lying s*&^.

#47 | Posted by Javelin

Gargle some more spray tanned balls, idiot.

What?!?! But I thought all those 2A fanatics were stockpiling weapons to prevent such a tyrannical government from forming...

Tens of thousands of asylum-seekers are still being detained and prosecuted despite following legal pathways to remain in the United States.

#36 | Posted by donnerboy

Weren't the several groups of migrants with special status classified as asylum seekers until Trump changed their status just so they could call them illegal and deport them?

Crickets from the MAGA morons.

They thought Obama was "invading" the southwest in Operation Jade Helm and screeched like harpies over it.

Now, a DHS secretary in charge of the largest, most well funded and intrusive federal law enforcement agency said "lets get rid of the Constitution" and they don't how up to comment at all.

What a bunch of d*&^less wonders.

That's because it's not really an agreement. It's more like an agreement to try to make an agreement. We've seen this before several times.

#13 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce

I believe they've been calling it a "memorandum of understanding."

So a concept of a plan lol

More market manipulation.

you think your garbage is debate / discussion

No, dumbf*&^, I don't. I'm saying that's what you'd get if you didn't post objectively stupid s*&^.

And there are policies regarding asylum seekers, but you have to follow them. You don't just get to decide you're going to live in your country of choice.

#21 | Posted by madbomber

I got bad news for you-they've been doing shady s*&^ with them to.

From arresting them when they show up to their hearing (they're doing it right) to instructing judges to deny and then arresting on the spot when they exit the court room (again, doing it correctly).

#35 | Posted by BellRinger

Hey dumbf*&^, posting drivel like this thread isn't going to get you a discussion or debate.

It's going to get you ridiculed and rightfully so.

" according to three sources familiar with those discussions"

#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Funny how you turd always focus on that to avoid criticizing Dear Leader.

Then also conveniently ignore the story when it's confirmed.

Was Bibi stupid enough to think he could control Trump? The man is beholden only to himself. Period.

Of course, it's important to consider that what Israel is demanding of the US is absurd and absent a full takeover of control of the US government was unlikely to ever go Bibi's way.

But maybe that's the point of the merger between Israel and the US' military. That's Plan B.

This is why the studies have difficulty normalizing, not every crime is the same, nor the criminal.

Indeed. Which is why a comparison of the relative distributions/stats of population data would be needed.

There will always be caveats.

What is the disparity in the length of time served for black vs white perps? Do tell JPW. Same prior arrest record and mitigating and exacerbating factors?

#92 | Posted by visitor_

Look at the punctuation at the end of my post. Ask an adult to explain it if needed.

14 Absolute BS. Anybody stab anybody in Colin County Texas, you're going to jail.

Sure. But what is the disparity in the length of time served for black vs white perps?

The issue is the "others" who get off tend to exhibit a lighter lighter skin tone than Karmelo.

#15 | Posted by snoofy

No s*&^. Thanks for explaining it to the class...