The best way to get them out is bullet proof evidence when they try to run for office again.

#12 | POSTED BY TWINPAC

No the best way is to strike when the iron is hot
The more time passes the less urgency will be

But dens are great at missing golden opportunities

@12
Welcome to fantasy island!!!

The problem started with the police LOOKING for a reason to pull him over. It is -------- harassment to be pulled over for a supposed lack of a tag. This type of harassment is done ALL THE TIME to generate revenue through tickets and court costs and to keep the bottom feeding lawyers employed.

---- the police and the whole criminal injustice system.

---- the police

Isn't Venmo that app that shares with your friends and family who you are sending money to?

Also, it looks like Nestor is Matt's son with his 13 year old girl friend that was covered up.

Link????

From the orlando sentinel article

Out on bond awaiting trial, Greenberg was then arrested again in February for breaking curfew to look for his wife in South Florida, according to authorities.

hahahahahahahahahah

IF IT WAS GOING TO BE A LOSS, WHY BOTHER!!?!!!
That's actually a pretty good question.

#44 | POSTED BY REDIA

I'm on the side of answering that question by saying we need to do everything we can to confront the anti-american insurrectionists.
Nancy Pelosi got it, at least back in January.
How do you answer that question?

There was one. He was acquitted.

#37 | POSTED BY REDIAL

JFC!!! THEN WHY BOTHER IMPEACHING HIM!!!!!!!!! IF IT WAS GOING TO BE A LOSS, WHY BOTHER!!?!!!

Jesus, ------- democrats.

The goal SHOULD have been to a. point out the mortal threat posed by republicans and b. gutting them in public opinion.

Get republicans on the record, under oath, defending the lies and conspiracies they were spewing. Either they go on record as liars or as whackadoodles WIN-WIN.

Instead, dems appeared weak during impeachment, won a news cycle for pandemic relief and on we go.

Chris dems suck

When you have your opponent on the defensive you press, hard, until they are destroyed.

After 1/6 moderate republicans were fleeing -------, even a few were condemning him, even a few voted for impeachment.

Donors were fleeing republicans.

Fast forward 2 months later and the furor is dying down, even the arrests are becoming back page news. ZERO republican congress critters are held responsible, ------- is coming out of the darkness, whackadoodles are being normalized.

The dems missed a GOLDEN opportunity.

But, hey, lay your faith in the SDNY, HA!!

Come 2022 with a red wave in the HoR, you will be crying tears.

There was one. He was acquitted.

#37 | POSTED BY REDIAL

What do you think would have been the effect of the Senate spending weeks or months trying every single -------, Qnon and Republican conspiracy theory?

Compare that to the effect of not calling any witnesses?

What did Republicans learn about 1/6?

That voting matters. Cause the presidential election wasn't close enough to justify ignoring the will of the people-simply too many states were lost. If it came down to 1 state? Things would have been different.

That is why they are doubling down on voter suppression.

Everything else is smoke.

The wheels of justice turn slow but the end results will probably put him in a psyco ward if his children don't do it first to keep him out of prison.

#11 | POSTED BY TWINPAC

Welcome to Fantasy Island!!!

So we should worry about Trump's return for the next 4 years?

#29 | POSTED BY TOR A

We should have started with an Impeachment trial.

I'm the type of person who regularly has sex with drunk partners, but I'm drunk too. Are we raping each other?
#16 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY

I know you are being facetious, but I would be careful if I were you. Clearly times are changing and state legislatures are taking note. Laws are being passed concerning consent. A lot of women have been raped and sexually assaulted under the influence and advocacy groups are pushing for laws that address it. I am all for women receiving this protection. I have seen men attempt to take advantage of drunk women and was appalled. Read about the Brock Turner case. They were both drunk, she passed out, he raped her, he sexually assaulted her. I believe he should have been held accountable for his actions, far more than he was.

Grow up, sober sex is even better

clarification, I believe they can add the charge and I think the defense stipulated to the misdemeanor crime

Is it too late for them to change or add that charge for the new trial?

#17 | POSTED BY SENTINEL A

I believe so, court called for a new trial. I don't think it will even get to trial as the defense admitted to the facts, just fought the charge that she was unconscious, as he clearly didn't do that crime (as written by the MN legislature). I suspect he will agree to a plea to the gross misdemeanor. Again, the problem is with how the law is written. The judges acknowledged that she was unconscious and agreed with the amautis(?) briefs from women advocacy groups that it should be crime to have sex with a passed out woman, but the legislative language is pretty clear.

I'm the type of person who regularly has sex with drunk partners, but I'm drunk too. Are we raping each other?

#16 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY

IDK, are your partners so drunk they can't consent?

BTW notice how the pandemic stimulus is no longer in the news cycle? Congrats dems you just lost 2022. Good thing we didnt have a LONG DRAWN out impeachment trial to show and show and show how insane the republican party is.

Thank goodness we didnt bother with an impeachment trial, that would have been too hard work.

Trump and his crime family ruined the lives of many completely innocent people with their lies. They need to face justice.

#3 | POSTED BY JOHNNY_HOTSAUCE

aint gonna happen

BTW Citation for my #13

Looks like there are trying to get more responsibility on the victim by not getting drunk in the first place.

#3 | POSTED BY BOAZ

Looks like you're the type of person that would have sex with a woman who was passed out drunk.

That doesn't mean if you make a mistake you should be raped though."
Has anyone claimed otherwise? The man will go on trial again for what he allegedly did.

#12 | POSTED BY SENTINE

Yes and apparently what he did is only a misdemeanor under MN law.

Here is how the statute reads: "Mentally incapacitated" means that a person under the influence of alcohol,
a narcotic, anesthetic, or any other substance, administered to that person
without the person's agreement, lacks the judgment to give a reasoned
consent to sexual contact or sexual penetration.

So, apparently, this cretin did not commit 3rd degree felony rape.

However, The State chose not to charge Khalil with fifth-degree criminal sexual conduct which criminalizes
nonconsensual sexual contact, a charge both the State and Khalil conceded would cover
the conduct alleged in this case but which is a gross misdemeanor rather than a felony for
a first offense

It sounds like the legislature ------ up

"Y'know, I just got, I turned off the news, I get all these flash reports, and they're telling me about the border, they're telling me about China, they're telling me about Iran"how're we doing with Iran, howdya like that? [Crowd boos]

"Boy, they were ready to make a deal, they woulda done anything, they woulda done anything, and this guy goes and drops the sanctions and then he says, 'We'd love to negotiate now,' [and Iran says], 'We're not dealing with the United States at all,' oh, well, they don't want to deal with us."

"And China, the same thing, they never treated us that way, right? You saw what happened a few days ago, was terrible, and uh, the border is not good, the border is the worst anybody's ever seen it, and what you see now, multiply it times 10, Jim. You would know how it handle it"he's the only one I know who would handle the border tougher than me.

"We have to, and the tough is... in the most humanitarian way, because that's what it is. What's happening to the kids, they're living in squalor, they are living like nobody has ever seen anybody, there's never been anything like what's, and you're gonna have hundreds, and you have it now, they have the airplane photos, the shocks, and they call 'em shocks, and these things are showing thousands and thousands of people coming up from South America and it's gonna be, it's just uh, look, it's a disaster. It's a humanitarian disaster from their standpoint, and it's gonna destroy the country, and frankly, the country can't afford it because you're talking about massive, just incredibly massive amounts. Our school systems, our hospital systems, everything."

"So it's a rough thing, and I just say, 'Do you miss me yet?'" [Audience applause]

"As we were saying, we did get 75 million votes, nobody's ever gotten that. They said, 'Get 66 million votes, sir, and the election's over.' We got 75 million and they said... 'but you know, you saw what happened', 10:30 in the evening, all of a sudden I said, 'That's a strange thing, why are they closing up certain places, right?'

"Now, a lot of things are happening right now, I just wanted to say, it's an honor to be here, it's an honor to have you at Mar-a-Lago, you are a great and beautiful couple."

ENDS.