I remember many Leftists here gloating about whites becoming a minority in the US. It's a logical outcome of the Democrat Open Border Policy. The Ruling Class doesn't like a lot of the current voters so they've decided to import and subsidize ones they believe will be more compliant.

#29 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

Are you going to go shoot up a grocery store in a predominantly african american neighborhood?

Just curious.

I truly get the fact that indicting Trump would cause more harm than good, even though he deserves it. But he is an ex President.
But again, and I've said this repeatedly on this board - the GOP should have taken matters into their own hands and either 1. Executed the impeachment in the Senate (which they seemed ready to do at one point - McConnell thought so anyway) OR 2. ban him from representing the GOP in any future election.
It's really that simple. Have some balls either way.

#11 | POSTED BY BRASS30

Don't hold your breath waiting for republicans to do the right thing.

FTA NYT Article: "Some Republican members of Congress have said that they were reluctant to vote for Trump's impeachment or conviction partly because of the threats against other members who had already denounced him."

Just goes to show you that the rightwing terrorism has actually been successful.

FFS they counted 4 as Left wing which means zero of the 2020 BLM killings in 2020 Were counted as political extremists

#7 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

BTW my lock solid prediction is that the public hearings will be a very loud fart.

They will draw attention for a short period of time, stink of the room for a bit, then dissipate.

Dems will be left pointing the finger at who laid it.

"...the panel had not agreed to turn them over."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

what a ------- joke.

First comment that comes to my mind --- what took them so long?
#1 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

Cowards got to cower.

496 days and counting.

Hey dems, republicans and ----------- have ZERO interest in compromise. They will not work with you. They are interested solely in power and will do ANYTHING to assure permanent control of the government. That successfully achieved that with the Supreme Court. They are doing it in the HoR (2022), next up will be the Senate (maybe 2022, maybe 2024) and the Presidency in 2024. Soon after I envision a grand re consideration by the republican powers on the basic tenet of voting for a president.

------- coward dems, oh wait statesmen, like chamberlain.

From the Op Ed

"Garland's caution, then, could be a form of statesmanship rather than cowardice."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

I told you so!

WOW, that op ed is a surrender manifesto.

the excuses are already being written. 1. Parsing -------- thought process would be impossible therefore reasonable doubt, 2. separation of powers and republicans will use ------- indictment to go after dems (as if they need justification) 3. indictment will cause unrest

There you have the justifications dems will use to not try ------- and his minions.

What a bunch of cowards the democrats are.

Surrendering without a fight.

Enjoy today cause the future will not be pretty.

496 days and counting

496 days and counting

"The shooter died after engaging the police in a shootout. He was James T. Hodgkinson, a 66-year-old hard-core Democrat who " less than six months into the Trump presidency " had sought to kill GOP lawmakers based on his belief that Republicans were corrupt traitors, fascists, and Kremlin agents."

From Ballwasher's link in 21

Welllllllllllllllllll, Republicans were corrupt traitors, fascists, and Kremlin agents...

I can't speak to the specific people targeted, but it seems to me you couldn't swing a dead cat at the republican convention without hitting more than a few traitors, fascists, and Kremlin agents.

Not justifying Hodgkinson's actions, btw, just pointing out a fact.

That's actually not a mainstream view held by Republicans. {SNIP}

#23 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

But mainstream republicans do tout the great replacement theory, which the Buffalo shooter believed was such a problem that he killed people over it.

he killed black people

Ugh autocorrect

"He killed black people because he believed in the great replacement theory which is advocated by mainstream republicans
It is that simple"

Honestly I don't know why what I wrote is even controversial

Was that theory why he killed black property?
Was that theory touted by the people I listed?
Are those people mainstream republicans?

What do you consider incorrect?

Of course Finland is running to NATO. I guess they thought just being smug about democracy was going to protect them from Russia snatching off their panties.
It helps to have a friend or protector to punch them into the mouth.

#16 | POSTED BY BOAZ

Of course Boaz is ignorant of Finnish history.

there is a reason why the scream of Hakkka Paalle! still runs shivers down russian spines.

You ever wonder why Russia didnt annex all of Finland after WW2 like they did with every other country?

Oh yeah, probably not as you are ignorant.

"the Confederacy has defeated the Republican Party."

The historical irony of this result is incredible

John,
I think pro-abortion simply means given the choice between having a child a woman doesn't want, it would be someone suggesting they should get an abortion.
People want to pretend that doesn't happen but of course it does.

#13 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Billj spouts more misogynistic nonsense, like women need to be told what to do with their bodies.

Hey bill, women are more than capable of making their own decisions without outside suggestions.

Actually that is all a bunch of words meaning nothing
It really is quite simple
He killed black people because he believed in the great replacement theory which is advocated by mainstream republicans

It is that simple

Everything else just smells of a lost soul looking for meaning -communist fascist socialist
He was a troubled lost child that was radicalized by the right wing hate machine

Congrats you built that

It really is that simple

Thank you Alex, but that was easy, Lefthandedturd was just doing a drive by. his post was nonsensical

"which is advocated by mainstream republicans
It is that simple"
#159 | POSTED BY TRUTHHURTS AT 2022-05-16 02:37 PM | FLAG:
(CHOOSE)
Which "mainstream republicans" are you talking about? Liz Cheney?

#166 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

Tucker Carlson
Laura Ingraham
Elise Stefanik
JD Vance
Josh Mandel
Steve King

@Snoofy again he stated his grounds for attacking blacks was because of the antisemitism he had towards Jews. If any of you had bothered looking at the crazy things he wrote you'd know this. But again, you read the RollingStone piece which conveniently left out everything I mentioned for a narrative.

#145 | POSTED BY REGINALD

Reggie, you ignore the very obvious fact that main stream republicans tout the great replacement theory

From what I read he was quite anti-semitic, thus his criticism of fox news since it is owned by a jew.

Many rightwing whackos definitely suffer from cognitive dissonance in that regard-jews hating jews, Laura Looner being one.

@E1G1 I read his manifesto, he's a nut job but he's not one of our but jobs. So try again k?

#122 | POSTED BY REGINALD

I'm curious reggie, where did you read this? As far as I can tell it was taken down shortly after the attack.

Were you following crazy white male.com websites?