Gallup will have no credibility from this point on.
They can't be trusted.
Nothing they publish can be trusted.
They, like those attorneys that capitulated, have determined their fate.
Anyone, any business that gives in, should go bankrupt.
Any school that doesn't fight against Trump can't be trusted to teach the truth.

If elections are every two years, the issue of having what you need to vote should be resolved after one voting cycle.

That right there is privilege speaking.

You are so bought into the lies from the Guardians of Pedophiles you have no idea how you sound.

LMAO!

Why bring this up when the Dow is over 50,000?
~ Bootlicker Bondi ~
#6 | POSTED BY REINHEITSGEBOT AT 2026-02-12 02:24 AM | FLAG:
"Why is everyone laughing?"
#7 | POSTED BY C0RI0LANUS AT 2026-02-12 03:07 AM | REPLY | FLAG:

What's wrong with a little molestation of even 9 year olds? Just LOOK at your portfolios! - -----------

She is a petulant 5 year old.

Minnesota's going to be paying for ICE's destruction for years to come. Homan's "We're leaving Minneapolis fixed" is laughable and insulting.

He's a lying arschloch. He should have just made the announcement and left the podium. Minnesota will definitely be safer with ICE GONE. They created chaos, havoc and murdered people. What a condescending piece of --------.

The above was quoted from (copy/pasted) the cited source and Newsweek.

Seattle's 29-13 victory over New England averaged 124.9 million viewers across NBC, Peacock, Telemundo, NBC Sports Digital and NFL+, according to Nielsen's Big Data + Panel ratings announced Tuesday.

Bad Bunny's halftime performance averaged 128.2 million viewers from 8:15 to 8:30 p.m. Eastern, (or 3.3 million more viewers than were watching the Super Bowl) according to Nielsen. That figure ranks as the fourth most-watched Super Bowl halftime show, trailing Kendrick Lamar in 2025, Michael Jackson in 1993 and Usher in 2024.

Global viewership figures for the halftime show are expected to be released early next week. Current stats on consumption of Bad Bunny's halftime show reached 4 billion views in the first 24 hours, a 137% increase over last years.

#9 - Powerful and to the point. And Bondi's reaction was sickening, disgusting. I don't have words.

Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky lawmaker who broke with his party to advance the legislation that forced the released of the Epstein files, also took Bondi to task for the release of victims' personal information, telling her: "Literally the worst thing you could do to survivors, you did."

Bondi told Massie that he was only focused on the files because Trump is mentioned in them, calling him a "hypocrite" with "Trump-derangement syndrome."

Total ***** Bondi.

Eberly.

Q: I am a resident of Kansas. A portion of my income was earned in Missouri and the remainder was earned in Kansas. Why can't I begin my Missouri return with only the Missouri source income?

A: Your Missouri return must begin with your total income (federal adjusted gross income) as reported on your federal return, even if you have income from another state. Your deductions and exemptions apply to your total income, not just part of it. The return is computed as if you are a full year resident and is then reduced by the Missouri income percentage (Form MO-NRI). The result is a prorated Missouri tax, based only on the income earned in Missouri.

Technically you need to review the laws for that state. They may have a "1 day, ok" law.

Snoofy has it right.

You'd have to physically go to each of those 30 states and do the work there and review the rules for each of the states.

That's a pretty simple google search, Eberly. Danforth's right - I know that from my own personal experience.

Just google it. I'll give you an example:

"If i work in Portland, Oregon but live in Vancouver, WA, who do I pay my taxes to?"

or

"If I live in Florida but have to go to San Jose, California to work on product development for a month, who do I pay my taxes to?"

She really defines that word.

#6 - Damn! That lays it all out. That NY Times article is damning as hell! Of course Howard Lutnick's balls deep in it. That liar and Epstein buddy.

True.

That was a GREAT half-time show! Loved it!

Trump's losing it more and more every single day. What a wacko.

#19 - perfectly stated.

For those that don't want to do math, he made $75k for winning as opposed to losing, and he's paying $14k in taxes on that bonus.
He's netting an additional $61,000.

His taxes outside of the above, based on days worked in CA remain the same.

Obvious correction for #17:
He'd pay $235 in taxes.
should be:
He'd pay $235k in taxes.

This is a outrage based on ignorance.

If he wins he gets the $178k bonus on top of his income he makes while working in CA.
That means he pays $249k on ALL his income earned in CA.

If he lost he'd get $103k bonus, and still has his income he made while working in CA.
He'd pay $235 in taxes.

Comparing the total tax bill for all income just to the bonus is what's called a "meaningless sum." It's nonsense.

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----

Jeff is A ----