Re: #4

The article claims LEAST likely and Republicans.

Your anecdotal evidence about Conservatives is irrelevant.

RIF

"Some revolution, the mob doesn't even agree it's one.
#75 | POSTED BY SITZKRIEG AT 2021-02-19 10:19 AM"

So?

Over 150 years after it ended, many still will not refer to the Civil War as the "Civil War" or even acknowledge that it was a rebellion. Many continue to refer to it as the "War Between the States" or (and this one is priceless!): "That Recent Unpleasantness".

A rose by any other name...

Being disparaged by (former) President Trump is high praise indeed!

Just sayin'...

Re: #6 & #7

No prob.

It, apparently, required being repeated!

"and they still failed to impeach.

#3 | POSTED BY SITZKRIEG AT 2021-02-15 10:27 AM"

More accurately:

President Trump was impeached twice. The process of impeachment is a duty carried out by the House of Representatives (not the Senate). What the Senate failed to do was reach the necessary 2/3 threshold (67 Senators) to convict. Even then, the reasons for voting to not convict by 43 Senators is not necessarily because they thought President Trump was innocent. Case in point: at least one Senator (see: Mitch McConnell) thought President Trump was guilty, but that the Senate was not the proper venue and/or did not have authority to convict a President who had left office after being impeached.

Re: #4 | POSTED BY LESWIT AT 2021-02-14 06:35 AM

Someplace warm.

Florida is a start.

RE: #16 | POSTED BY MENSAMAN AT 2021-02-12 09:20 PM

My presumption that you know how to use the internet seems woefully misplaced.

Here's some assistance to get you started:

#16 | POSTED BY MENSAMAN AT 2021-02-12 09:20 PM

Flag: IRONY

Thanks, YAV

You saved me the trouble of posing the obvious.

Apparently, you are more internet savvy than some Mensa folks.

"Re: #12 | POSTED BY HUMTAKE AT 2021-02-10 12:12 PM"

BENGHAZI!

To make it easier: It won't be necessary to list the cases which were lost. Just list the 15 from the win column'.

Re: #4 | POSTED BY MAVERICK AT 2021-02-08 03:20 PM

That's quite an extraordinary claim.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
Please list the 22 cases that were won including what was adjudicated and the final judgments.

"The funny thing is that their political bias is going to cost them big as they committed fraud in their customer contracts.
#5 | POSTED BY MENSAMAN AT 2021-02-05 05:40 AM"

I don't think anyone is disputing that "they" (BTW, it might help if you're going to make accusations, to actually be specific as to WHO you are accusing and what your are accusing them of!) are using moderation (aka "censorship") algorithms. That is not illegal (refer: the wording of the 1st Amendment) and "they" are already on record as saying that they do so. However, your claim that "they" committed fraud could be viewed as libelous if the lawsuit fails. Free advice: I'd suggest waiting until the lawsuit is adjudicated.

RE: #3 | POSTED BY MENSAMAN AT 2021-02-05 01:03 AM

As has already been repeatedly pointed out: it's easy to initiate a lawsuit (see Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani). I, as most others, will wait for the outcome of the lawsuit before forming an opinion as to the lawsuits validity.

"well duh! That's true for EVERY President.
BLUE"

LOL This comedy writes itself.
#24 | POSTED BY PHESTEROBOYLE AT 2021-02-03 02:24 PM"

EVERY President controls all three branches of the Federal government?

Hey, if you're going to use my comment, at least get it correct and also not manipulate it out of context.

You are correct: the comedy writes itself! Well, at least it does whenever you post!

"Making things hard for the President? That's a novel idea. /s
#18 | POSTED BY PHESTEROBOYLE AT 2021-02-03 10:40 AM"

Oh look! Another "both sider" chimes in. How novel. /sarc

If your point is that there were folks opposed to some actions of President Trump, well duh! That's true for EVERY President. As long as we're pointing out the obvious: there's a vast difference between an opposition that does NOT control any of the three branches of the federal government and a POTUS that does control all three branches.

Go whine someplace else about how difficult it was for President Trump (I mean other than shooting below par on the links!).

" #9
Doing well. an opportunity. Tracking the betting odds on how long Joementia will last until Harris takes over.
#10 | POSTED BY WILLOWBY AT 2021-01-21 12:16 AM"

From here it looks like you're going to stroke out before President Biden.

Suggest you pace yourself...

'He who rides a tiger is afraid to dismount'.
- Chinese proverb

Normal?

Let me guess.
Your first name is Abbie?

(apologies to Young Frankenstein)

Of course this will take months to finalize. It's not like it's a Supreme Court justice nomination/confirmation!

RE: #14 | POSTED BY GONOLES92 AT 2021-01-10 09:48 AM

Possibly.

OTOH, it just seems so typically political from this administration. This maneuver likely has only three possible outcomes:

1. It sparks a new relationship with China that flourishes into a win-win for both countries.

2. It festers into a foreign policy disaster that (at best) becomes more same-old same-old or, (at worst) heralds in a new era of spiraling animosity that concludes with economic/armed conflict with China.

3. This simply fizzles out and gets lost in subsequent news cycles with little effect one way or the other.

If #1 occurs, you know who will take all the credit regardless if the incoming administration gets stuck with all the heavy lifting to implement it. If #2 occurs, the incoming administration will get smeared with all the blame as no one will recall (or care) who actually "lit the fuse". If #3 occurs, it becomes a non-event: no gain; no loss but at the expense of essentially no effort.

Given the current administrations track record (both before and during this presidency. See: new casinos, foreign trade/tariffs, containment of North Korean threat, "The Wall", etc., etc.), I suspect this is being done and precisely being done NOW to throw just one more Sabot into the machinery to satisfy President Trump's petulance and/or political machinations (or both!).

"Oh this hero is repenting. Well in that case he certainly deserves an invite to Washington, you know, to hand him the keys to the city and present him the Congressional Medal of Honor.
#23 | POSTED BY CRISISSTILLS AT 2021-01-09 02:11 PM"

or maybe the Presidential Medal of Free Dumb?

"Colt also tells CBS2 that he is speaking with his lawyer to see what his next steps should be."

Many, Long, and Rapid

"Just checking to see how many pukes are glad he died.
Sad
#10 | POSTED BY PHESTEROBOYLE AT 2020-12-30 08:49 AM"

Which, at the time of your post, was a grand total of ZERO!

Using your words:
How many pukes will not admit that their post was simply trolling because they had not actually read what was already posted.

It would appear to be just ONE.

Now THAT is sad!

"Whatever. America is still the place EVERYONE on earth comes when they need top care and are about to die. America is the last resort when you have a complex surgery and you are in another country. People come HERE.
Again, whatever. Go to Europe if it's so bad here.
But we know that wont happen.
#2 | POSTED BY BOAZ AT 2020-12-29 08:43 AM"

Really?

How do you explain these data: