Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, August 01, 2025

USCIS declared flatly that the children of immigrants who are "unlawfully present" will "no longer be U.S. citizens at birth." They will, instead, inherit the status of their parents, rendering them detainable and deportable as infants and throughout their lives. There is no indication that the government will provide some grace period before snatching up and imprisoning this new underclass of noncitizen babies; they are apparently subject to arrest from the moment of birth.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

As ALEXANDRITE said: Welcome to fascism.

#1 | Posted by Zed at 2025-08-01 02:30 PM | Reply

WOWSERS That's so unconstitutional.

#2 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-08-01 02:33 PM | Reply

European Americans colonized the world and yet are some of the most xenophobic people on earth.

#3 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-08-01 02:37 PM | Reply

At this point it's just a plan for if the court allows the end of birthright citizenship. Maybe the plan will sound so bad that the Supreme Court won't have any choice but to rule against something that is one of the easiest cases I've ever heard of.

We better hope so because if the court allows the president to ignore the 14th amendment then he'll pretty much be allowed to ignore the other 26.

#4 | Posted by TaoWarrior at 2025-08-01 02:46 PM | Reply

I told you so

The SC will eventually endorse this or something close to it

#5 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-08-01 02:57 PM | Reply

It really is amazing how right I am all the time

#6 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-08-01 02:57 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

It really is amazing how right I am all the time

#6 | Posted by truthhurts

Indeed. And on those rare occasions you fail I carry the slack.

#7 | Posted by Zed at 2025-08-01 03:26 PM | Reply

We better hope so because if the court allows the president to ignore the 14th amendment then he'll pretty much be allowed to ignore the other 26.

#4 | POSTED BY TAOWARRIOR

Yup. I have a 5 gallon bucket of popcorn waiting to pop when Trump becomes the first major anti-gun POTUS in our history.

#8 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-01 03:26 PM | Reply

Republicans who support this and gleefully voted for this sure are tight lipped about it!

#9 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-01 03:55 PM | Reply

ndeed. And on those rare occasions you fail I carry the slack.

#7 | POSTED BY ZED AT 2025-08-01 03:26 PM | FLAG:

You are excellent in n those topics I am less informed on

Great teamwork

Progressive liberals like us have the advantage of living in reality

#10 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-08-01 04:12 PM | Reply

. I have a 5 gallon bucket of popcorn waiting to pop when Trump becomes the first major anti-gun POTUS in our history.

#8 | POSTED BY JPW AT

I've said this before. ------- will throw out the 2nd amendment the minute guns threaten his power

Right now the undercurrent of violence serves him well

#11 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-08-01 04:14 PM | Reply

#11 I've always thought, and still think, that it will be selective.

They'll find ways to target perceived opponents or people they think aren't on board with their agenda.

That way, they won't risk alienating their base and could even convince many of them to show they don't give a s^%# about the 2A either by having them support or assist.

#12 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-01 04:30 PM | Reply

None of this can be implemented, yet. However, look at it like this. Often times litigants and courts have to speculate about the practical effects of new laws. No need for speculation here, the Buffoon laid all the horribles out for God and everybody to see. You can bet that litigants and court will be paying attention.

Makes me wonder if that was Robert's thought in letting the planning go forward.

#13 | Posted by et_al at 2025-08-01 08:00 PM | Reply

Where are the Pedos....I mean MAGAts....to argue Trump can ignore the Constitution and Supreme Court?

#14 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-08-01 08:24 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort