#18 you don't help people up by tearing other people down. That's Marxist logic.

#20 | Posted by BellRinger

Ironic from you.

If you can think of a better way to make up for generations of racism keeping minorities out of college and lost generational wealth, you be sure to let us know.

No college degrees in the family? Much less likely to go to college.

Poor family? Much less likely to go to college.

Jeff thinking getting rid of DEI means a level playing field? Priceless stupidity.

Also, how does DEI tear people down? It literally just recognizes historical hurdles in college admissions.

The great fallacy of DEI was that it was about race, NOPE it was about White Women, top of the victim hierarchy.

#3 | Posted by oneironaut

Minority generations ------ over by white men resulting in few if any members of their families with college educations and little to no generational wealth often in underfunded schools suddenly get a helping hand to compete with white people's already existing headstart and often legacy admissions causes racist Conservatives to have a meltdown.

Charlie Kirk himself made up a story about not getting into West Point because of a minority woman taking his spot.

99% of the time, it's some white dude imagining they didn't get a job or get into their college of choice because of DEI.

White Dude Jeff Bellringer: "Sure, I got two DUIs, an 8th grade education, no experience, and have to wear an ankle monitor for things I won't discuss, but they hired that black woman with a masters degree, no criminal history, and 10 years of experience due to DEI."

(Irony, DEI was HELPING men compete with women at colleges were trying to balance gender of incoming classes because many more women were applying. Not anymore.)

The whole point is to drive up energy prices to make oil and coal profitable again.

It currently cannot compete with wind and solar.

The entire world made the tech giants rich because their products are in high demand. California wants to confiscate wealth? See ya!

#27 | Posted by BellRinger

No. And you're an idiot for thinking the world is that simple. Jesus Christ, you are just so dumb it hurts.

They became rich because we gave them a stable, rich domestic market, we gave them a reliable, educated workforce to develop their products, a safe, protected property from which to do business, reliable infrastructure and utilities, a nation where they didn't have to worry about a foreign country or terrorist organization blowing them or their business up, and robust IP protection laws and courts to protect their patents.

They leached off that to make their wealth and used every tax cheat in the book along the way. Google also used anti-competitive practices to drive off competition and bankrupt them.

So let them go to a red state and leach off them for a while.

Or better yet, go to a country like Ethiopia or Iraq or Afghanistan or Ecuador and see if they could repeat the success there. There is a reason all of these products are coming from the US and not Europe, China, Japan, Korea, Africa or anywhere else in Asia or Australia.

He's also taking a huge stake in McDonald's.

#7 | Posted by Corky

You mean a huge daily order.

We are Communist now

Enforcing...law is not fascism.
#33 | Posted by BellRinger

And was against enforcing laws against Trump, i.e. 34 felonies.

Enforcing...law is not fascism.
#33 | Posted by BellRinger

Remember this is the same idiot who advocated ignoring mask laws under Biden.

Walz is useless. He won't do this.

#13 | Posted by BellRinger

Translation: "He hasn't raped any underage girls! How can I respect him?!"

Has anyone told Venezuela this?

The White House also said the oil is already in barrels and on ships headed to the US...because they ship oil IN BARRELS on ships now...

You forgot Ukraine, China, and Russia, don't forget NATO.
West is down on artillery rounds.
Why U.S. Artillery Shells Remain in Short Supply in 2025
thedefensewatch.com

#13 | Posted by oneironaut

...How stupid are you?

Your own article explains our artillary shell production was cut in half by the Orange Pedo's Tariffs. We couldn't get a lot of the components we rely on from other countries suddenly.

Also we aren't "down on artillary rounds." We simply aren't producing as many or have capacity to produce as many as perhaps we should.

You know, so you can put them in storage and let them expire only to be replaced again for twice the price.

US "Leadership"

Michael Byrd got multiple cash bonuses an award from Biden and a ceremony in the Capital. Heck, wife even got a daycare $$$. His safety was never at risk.

#31 | Posted by visitor_

He didn't murder anyone.

Violently breaking through a door during an insurrection to murder congressmen and women justifies being shot by law enforcement because you present a clear and present danger.

Driving away from ICE does not present a clear and present danger, especially when ICE has no legal right to stop you.

Thank you for coming to my TedTalk called "Facts aren't that hard, you're just stupid".

When Venezuela seized oil infrastructure years back, US companies invested in Canada for the same type of oil. They spent $500 billion to do so.

They sure as ---- aren't going to invest in Venezuela to compete with themselves.

So let's see...

We can throw them in jail OR throw them in rehab and if they complete it, they won't go to jail.

Do we want them in jail or clean?

We know what Boaz wants... Shame there isn't rehab for stupidity.

They aren't going to put tens of billions of dollars into Venezuala for years until the political environment is well settled and the investment is safe.

Dumbass MAGAts are so stupid.

Remember this?
" Biden Raises Bounty for Nicols Maduro to $25 Million"
www.nytimes.com

#25 | Posted by BellRinger

Are you stupid enough to equate that with actually invading a foreign country, taking over its government, and doing all this without Congressional approval as required by the Constitution?

...you really are a stupid MAGAt Pedo Racist, aren't you?

You are such a dumb ---. Contextualize it all you want, in those two instances the US did facilitate regime change and the outcome was good for Hawaii and decent for Puerto Rico.
#186 | Posted by BellRinger

Hawaii had a rebellion and rampant disease after the takeover brought the population from 500,000 to 40,000 native Hawaiians. (92% loss)
Puerto Rico isn't even a state and you all are freaking out over Bad Bunny being at the Super Bowl. We basically keep the territory under our thumb and have huge price increases on their goods. See the Jones Act. Then we took over local government and basically just took over their resources, wiped out their culture, and refuse to support them when a hurricane hits.
#255 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT

Long term those were both successful. It's not a difficult concept. You really are a dumb ----
#258 | Posted by BellRinger

Wait wait wait...
Did you just say killing off the locals and stealing their resources was good in the long term?
#262 | Posted by Sycophant

When morons like Sycophant and Alexandrite see: posted by Bellringer, reading comprehension goes out the window. Case in point:
#268 | Posted by BellRinger

Notice Jeff switching topics again and avoiding the Fact Check?

I guess he really does root for just killing off the brown locals.

Historically US engineered regime change has gone poorly.

#34 | Posted by BellRinger

Wow. On the other thread he is saying it goes well.

Hawaii had a rebellion and rampant disease after the takeover brought the population from 500,000 to 40,000 native Hawaiians. (92% loss)
Puerto Rico isn't even a state and you all are freaking out over Bad Bunny being at the Super Bowl. We basically keep the territory under our thumb and have huge price increases on their goods. See the Jones Act. Then we took over local government and basically just took over their resources, wiped out their culture, and refuse to support them when a hurricane hits.
#255 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT AT 2026-01-03 04:47 PM | REPLY | FLAG"

I'll bust out the crayons and explain it one more time to your moronic ass. Long term those were both successful. It's not a difficult concept. You really are a dumb ----
#258 | Posted by BellRinger

Wait wait wait...

Did you just say killing off the locals and stealing their resources was good in the long term?

Killing brown people? Check
Pedophilia is okay? Check

Jeff just pushing those MAGAt ideals.

JEFF, GO FOR A TRIFECTA! Tell us cheating on your wife is good for her! Tell us fraud is good for the victims! Tell us soldiers and veterans are suckers and losers!

" How stupid are you?
#171 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT AT 2026-01-03 01:33 PM | FLAG: "
You are such a dumb ---. Contextualize it all you want, in those two instances the US did facilitate regime change and the outcome was good for Hawaii and decent for Puerto Rico.
Learn how to read, dipshht

#186 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-01-03 01:40 PM

So you have TWO examples where we turned them into states and it "went well."

Hawaii had a rebellion and rampant disease after the takeover brought the population from 500,000 to 40,000 native Hawaiians. (92% loss)

Puerto Rico isn't even a state and you all are freaking out over Bad Bunny being at the Super Bowl. We basically keep the territory under our thumb and have huge price increases on their goods. See the Jones Act. Then we took over local government and basically just took over their resources, wiped out their culture, and refuse to support them when a hurricane hits.

Again...I ask...HOW ------- STPUID ARE YOU?!

video of people lining the streets.....one lane of cars....people draping both flags over shoulders..
people in cars waving flags and everyone yelling " LIBERTAD.........LIBERTAD !!

#236 | Posted by shrimptacodan

When you have literally NOTHING ELSE to justify the invasion or how it benefits America...

...you go to foreign countries to get people supporting the US removing Maduro.

didn't give a F about women and children raped and murdered by illegal animals let in by
who ever was running the government....
now suddenly concerned with loss of human life..
you sir....are a true democrat.
#229 | Posted by shrimptacodan

You can always tell who gets their news from 4Chan memes...while they protect their Pedophile President.

Makes you wonder...how many of them are Pedophiles too?

My only two concerns at this point is
1. What is the price tag?
2. what does China and Russia cook up now?

#13 | Posted by lfthndthrds

1. At least a trillion dollars and higher oil prices for a while (unless the US economy continues to crater and demand drops)
2. ANYTHING they want. International Law no longer exists. And the US is now too overcommitted in Venezuala to be effective elsewhere.

Good job, idiots.

So another $1-2 trillion to bolster US Oil Companies.

What does the average American get for this? Nothing.